Search

Objective: Introduction: In this article, the authors focused on the symptoms of ischemic stroke and the effect of neurorehabilitation methods on the functional status of patients after ischemic stroke. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the functional status of patients after ischemic stroke with improved classic kinesiotherapy, classic kinesiotherapy and NDT-Bobath and classic kinesiotherapy and PNF., Patients and Methods: Materials and methods: The study involved 120 patients after ischemic stroke. Patients were treated in the Department of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine USK of Medical University in Lodz. Patients were divided into 3 groups of 40 people. Group 1 was rehabilitated by classical kinesiotherapy. Group 2 was rehabilitated by classic kinesiotherapy and NTD-Bobath. Group 3 was rehabilitated by classical kinesiotherapy and PNF. In all patient groups, magnetostimulation was performed using the Viofor JPS System. The study was conducted twice: before treatment and immediately after 5 weeks after the therapy. The effects of applied neurorehabilitation methods were assessed on the basis of the Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA)., Results: Results: In all three patient groups, functional improvement was achieved. However, a significantly higher improvement was observed in patients in the second group, enhanced with classical kinesitherapy and NDT-Bobath., Conclusion: Conclusions: The use of classical kinesiotherapy combined with the NDT-Bobath method is noticeably more effective in improving functional status than the use only classical kinesiotherapy or combination of classical kinesiotherapy and PNF patients after ischemic stroke.

Introduction: Abnormalities in the secretory and endocrine functions of the kidneys are often diagnosed in patients with chronic kidney disease and undergoing haemodialysis, leading to disturbances in body homeostasis. Frequent multimorbidity is an additional factor that negatively affects homeostasis. These factors contribute to a decrease in cardiopulmonary fitness, deterioration of the patient's psychophysical status, and, consequently, a decrease in quality of life. Due to several limitations of rehabilitation in this group of patients, solutions are constantly being sought to safely avoid or reduce the problems resulting from the above health burdens. Among the least invasive methods are magnetic stimulation and properly prepared and administered kinesitherapy. Aim of the study: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of magnetic stimulation and kinesitherapy on selected blood parameters in haemodialysis patients. Material and methods: The study covered 26 people. Six patients received magnetic stimulation and kinesitherapy, 10 received only kinesitherapy, and the others were in the control group. At baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks, blood tests were performed in all three groups to evaluate changes in the parameters studied (RBC, Hb, HCT, WBC, PLT, Na ions, K ions, Cl ions, urea, Pi, tCa, ALP and parathormone). Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the blood parameters studied, except for urea. The urea level in the group where patients underwent magnetic stimulation and exercise increased in the second collection but decreased in the third, whereas in the exercise-only group, it showed an increasing trend in all 3 collections. Conclusions: The levels of the assessed blood parameters do not show statistically significant changes (except for urea). However, one can observe certain non-statistically significant changes in the assessed blood parameters that are more noticeable in the study groups than in the control group. Therefore, it can be suspected that both treatments involving magnetic stimulation in combination with exercise and exercise alone have an impact on the human body. However, further research in this area is necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]