Search

We examined the effect of short-term heat acclimation with permissive dehydration (STHADe) on heat acclimation (HA) and cycling performance in a temperate environment. Ten trained male cyclists [mean (SD) maximal oxygen uptake: 63.3(4.0) mL/kg/min; peak power output (PPO): 385(40) W; training: 10 (3) h/week] underwent a STHADe program consisting of 5 days of exercise (maximum 90 min/day) in a hot environment (40 °C, 50% RH) to elicit isothermic heat strain [rectal temperature 38.64(0.27) °C]. Participants abstained from fluids during, and 30 min after, HA sessions. Pre- and post-STHADe HA was evaluated during euhydrated fixed-intensity exercise (60 min) in hot conditions; the effect of STHADe on thermoregulation was also examined under temperate conditions (20 min fixed-intensity exercise; 22 °C, 60% RH). Temperate cycling performance was assessed by a graded exercise test (GXT) and 20-km time trial (TT). STHADe reduced thermal and cardiovascular strain in hot and temperate environments. Lactate threshold [Δ = 16 (17) W] and GXT PPO [Δ = 6 (7) W] were improved following STHADe (P < 0.05), but TT performance was not affected (P > 0.05), although there was a trend for a higher mean power (P = 0.06). In conclusion, STHADE can reduce thermal and cardiovascular strain under hot and temperate conditions and there is some evidence of ergogenic potential for temperate exercise, but longer HA regimens may be necessary for this to meaningfully influence performance., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

It is generally assumed that exercise and shivering are analogous processes with regard to substrate utilisation and that, as a consequence, exercise can be used as a model for shivering. In the present study, substrate utilisation during exercise and shivering at the same oxygen consumption (VO2) were compared. Following an overnight fast, eight male subjects undertook a 2-h immersion in cold water, designed to evoke three different intensities of shivering. At least 1 week later they undertook a 2-h period of bicycle ergometry during which the exercise intensity was varied to match the VO2 recorded during shivering. During both activities hepatic glucose output (HGO), the rate of glucose utilisation (Rd), blood glucose, plasma insulin, free fatty acid (FFA) and beta-hydroxybutyrate (B-HBA) concentrations were measured. The VO2 measured during the different levels of shivering averaged 0.49 l.min-1 (level 1: low), 0.6 l.min-1 (level 2: low-moderate), and 0.9 l.min-1 (level 3: moderate), and corresponded closely to the levels measured during exercise. HGO and Rd were greater (P < 0.05) during exercise than during shivering at the same VO2 (9.5% and 14.7%, respectively). The average (SD). HGO during level 3 exercise was 3.0 (0.91) mg.kg-1.min-1 compared to 2.76 (1.0) mg.kg-1.min-1 during shivering. The values for Rd were 3.06 (0.98) mg.kg-1.min-1 during level 3 exercise and 2.68 (0.82) mg.kg-1.min-1 during shivering. Blood glucose levels did not differ between conditions averaging 5.4 (0.3) mmol.l-1 over all levels of shivering and 5.2 (0.3) mmol.l-1 during exercise. Plasma FFA and B-HBA were higher (P < 0.01) during shivering than during corresponding exercise (12.3% and 33.3%, respectively). FFA averaged 0.61 (0.2) mmol.l-1 over all levels of shivering and 0.47 (0.16) mmol.l-1 during exercise. The figures for L-HBA were 0.44 (0.13) mmol. l-1 during all levels of shivering and 0.32 (0.1) mmol.l-1 during exercise. Plasma insulin was higher (P < 0.05) during level 2 and 3 shivering compared to corresponding exercise; at these levels the average value for plasma insulin was 95.9 (21.9) pmol.l-1 during shivering and 80.6 (16.1) pmol.l-1 during exercise. On the basis of the present findings it is concluded that, with regard to substrate utilisation, shivering and exercise of up to 2 h duration should not be regarded as analogous processes.

This study aimed to examine thermoregulation in different clothing assemblies during a representative cycling exercise protocol. Six men undertook cycling exercise simulating representative thermal exchange challenges while wearing low ( LOW), intermediate ( INT1 and INT2), or high ( HI) amounts of clothing. Exercise was conducted at 14.5 °C, 46.8% relative humidity and included a 'flat' [45 min at 35% peak power output ( PPO), wind speed 8.3 m/s], 'uphill' (30 min at 55% PPO, wind speed 3.6 m/s), and 'downhill' (20 min at 50 W, wind speed 16.7 m/s) stage. Rectal temperature changed with the exercise stage and was independent of clothing assembly. In contrast, an 'envelope' was evident for mean body temperature, resulting from differences in mean skin temperature between the LOW and HI conditions. The elevated mean body temperature in HI was associated with increased physiological 'cost,' in the form of increased sweat production and heart rate. Physiological cost provides a better index of clothing performance than deep body temperature in the 'thermoregulatory zone,' as a consequence sports clothing should attempt to optimize the balance between comfort and reduced physiological cost. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is increasing anecdotal evidence that simple occupational tests of aerobic fitness impose a systematic bias against heavier personnel when predicting fitness for load‐carrying tasks. This study tested the hypothesis that simple field tests of aerobic fitness are not good predictors of load‐carrying performance and that personnel with greater body mass are more able to perform occupationally relevant load‐carrying tasks. Twelve healthy male volunteers ran on a level treadmill at 9.5 km/h for 4 min, with (T18) and without (T0) an external backpack load of 18 kg. During each exercise period, steady‐state oxygen uptake (VO2) was assessed. On a subsequent occasion (at least 7 days later), 11 of the subjects ran to exhaustion at 9.5 km/h whilst carrying the 18 kg external load (ETT18). There was a strong inverse linear relationship between relative VO2 and body mass (r = −0.87, P < 0.01) and between VO2 and lean body mass (r = −0.74, P < 0.01) during the T18 trials. Furthermore, there was a moderately strong relationship between exercise time (ETT18) and body mass (r = 0.69, P < 0.05) and between exercise time and lean body mass (r = 0.71, P < 0.05). There was no relationship between exercise tolerance time and VO2 (r = 0.12). The results show that fitness tests that determine aerobic power in units relative to body mass (e.g. timed distance run) incur a systematic bias against heavier personnel. Such tests are therefore inappropriate when predicting the ability of personnel to work in occupations that encompass load‐carrying tasks. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]