Search

Background: Recent estimates suggest an 11% prevalence of current late-life depression (LLD) and a lifetime prevalence of 16-20%. LLD leads to cognitive disturbance as well as a nearly two to three times increased risk of dementia. We conducted a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) which demonstrated that Sahaj Samadhi meditation (SSM), an easy-to-implement, meditation-based augmentation strategy, led to higher rates of symptom remission when compared to treatment as usual (40.0 vs 16.3%; odds ratio, 3.36; 95% CI 1.06-10.64; p = 0.040). Here we present a protocol describing a two-site, blinded, RCT, comparing an SSM arm to an active-control arm - a Health Enhancement Program (HEP) intervention - in their ability to reduce depressive symptoms and improve executive functioning, among several other exploratory outcomes., Methods/design: One hundred and ninety-two (n = 192) participants with LLD will be recruited at two sites (London, ON, Canada, and Montreal, QC, Canada). Participants will undergo stratified randomization with regards to site and the presence of treatment-resistant-LLD (TR-LLD) or not, to either SSM or HEP. We will assess change in (1) depression severity using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), (2) executive functioning, and (3) other exploratory physiological and mood-based measures, at baseline (0 weeks), post intervention (12 weeks), and 26 weeks after baseline. Raters, clinicians, and care providers will be blinded to group allocation while participants will be blinded to the study hypotheses., Discussion: This study should more definitively assess whether SSM can be used as an augmentation strategy in routine clinical care for patients suffering from LLD and TR-LLD. If the effects of SSM are significantly better than HEP, it will offer support for the routine use of this intervention to manage LLD/TR-LLD and comorbid declines in executive dysfunction. The results of this study could also inform whether SSM can improve/prevent cognitive decline in LLD., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03564041 . Registered on 20 June 2018.

Objectives: To compare the dual-task gait performance of older adults with Late-Life Depression (LLD) versus Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)., Design: Cross-sectional study with three matched groups: LLD, MCI and non-depressed and cognitively intact (NDCI)., Setting: LLD group participants were recruited from geriatric psychiatry clinics in London, Ontario. Matched participants meeting criteria for the MCI or NDCI groups were previously recruited for other research studies from geriatric clinics and the community., Participants: Individuals aged 60-85 who met criteria for mild-moderate LLD (N=23) without a diagnosis of a neurocognitive disorder., Measurements: Participants completed questionnaires regarding mood, cognition and physical activity. Gait speed was recorded using an electronic walkway during simple and dual-task gait (walking while naming animals aloud). Dual-task cost (DTC) is the percentage change in gait speed between simple and dual-task gait. It is a clinically relevant indicator of fall risk and is strongly associated with cognitive decline. For comparison, 23 MCI and 23 NDCI participants, matched with respect to age, sex and comorbidities, were randomly selected from existing research databases., Results: Each group had 8 males and 15 females, with mean age of 69.0-69.6 years. The mean (±SD) DTC of the NDCI, LLD and MCI groups were statistically different at 2.4±11.4%, 11.8±9.9% and 22.2±16.7%, respectively., Conclusion: Older adults with LLD perform worse on dual-task gait than NDCI; however, they are less impaired than those with MCI. The elevated DTC seen in LLD is likely because of underlying executive dysfunction that is less significant than in those with MCI., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)