Search

• Electrical stimulation in white matter induces delays in the evoked response due to slow conduction velocity. • The waveforms from white matter and cortical stimulation remain generally identical. • Responses to white matter and cortical stimulation differ on response times. • The relaxation of the N1 component is longer during cortical stimulations. • There is probable activation of intra-cortical axons during cortical stimulation. Direct cortical responses (DCR) and axono-cortical evoked potentials (ACEP) are generated by electrically stimulating the cortex either directly or indirectly through white matter pathways, potentially leading to different electrogenic processes. For ACEP, the slow conduction velocity of axons (median ≈ 4 m.s−1) is anticipated to induce a delay. For DCR, direct electrical stimulation (DES) of the cortex is expected to elicit additional cortical activity involving smaller and slower non-myelinated axons. We tried to validate these hypotheses. DES was administered either directly on the cortex or to white matter fascicles within the resection cavity, while recording DCR or ACEP at the cortical level in nine patients. Short but significant delays (≈ 2 ms) were measurable for ACEP immediately following the initial component (≈ 7 ms). Subsequent activities (≈ 40 ms) exhibited notable differences between DCR and ACEP, suggesting the presence of additional cortical activities for DCR. Distinctions between ACEPs and DCRs can be made based on a delay at the onset of early components and the dissimilarity in the shape of the later components (>40 ms after the DES artifact). The comparison of different types of evoked potentials allows to better understand the effects of DES. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion is an established surgical procedure for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is standard practice for this procedure. Anesthetic agents can have different, but significant, effects on neurophysiological monitoring outcomes. Aim: To determine if intravenous lidocaine infusion therapy has an impact on the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Methods: Following ethical approval, we conducted a retrospective review of charts and the archived intraoperative neurophysiological data of adolescents undergoing posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring data included the amplitude of motor evoked potentials and the amplitude and latency of somatosensory evoked potentials. A cohort who received intraoperative lidocaine infusion were compared to those who did not. Results: Eighty‐one patients were included in this analysis, who had surgery between February 4, 2016 and April 22, 2021: 39 had intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion and 42 did not. Based on hourly snapshot data, there was no evidence that lidocaine infusion had a detrimental effect on the measured change from baseline for MEP amplitudes in either lower (mean difference 41.9; 95% confidence interval −304.5 to 388.3; p =.182) or upper limbs (MD −279.0; 95% CI −562.5 to 4.4; p =.054). There was also no evidence of any effect on the measured change from baseline for SSEP amplitudes in either lower (MD 16.4; 95% CI −17.7 to 50.5; p =.345) or upper limbs (MD −2.4; 95% CI −14.5 to 9.8; p =.701). Finally, there was no evidence of a difference in time to first reportable neurophysiological event (hazard ratio 1.13; 95% CI 0.61 to 2.09; p =.680). Conclusions: Data from these two cohorts provide preliminary evidence that intravenous lidocaine infusion has no negative impact on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during PSIF for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evoked potentials can be used as an intraoperative monitoring measure in neurological surgery. Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), or specifically brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAERs), are known for being minimally affected by anesthetics, while visually evoked potentials (VEPs) are presumed to be unreliable and easily affected by anesthetics. While many anesthesia trials or intraoperative recordings have provided evidence in support of these hypotheses, the comparisons were always made between AEPs and VEPs recorded sequentially, rather than recorded at the same time. Although the logistics of improving data comparability of AEPs and VEPs may be a challenge in clinical settings, it is much more approachable in animal models to measure AEPs and VEPs as simultaneously as possible. Five cats under dexmedetomidine sedation received five, 10-min blocks of isoflurane with varying concentrations while click-evoked AEPs and flash-evoked VEPs were recorded from subdermal electrodes. We found that, in terms of their waveforms, (1) short-latency AEPs (BAERs) were the least affected while middle-latency AEPs were dramatically altered by isoflurane, and (2) short-latency VEPs was less persistent than that of short-latency AEPs, while both middle- and long-latency VEPs were largely suppressed by isoflurane and, in some cases, completely diminished. In addition, the signal strength in all but the middle-latency AEPs was significantly suppressed by isoflurane. We identified multiple AEP or VEP peak components demonstrating suppressed amplitudes and/or changed latencies by isoflurane. Overall, we confirmed that both cat AEPs and VEPs are affected during isoflurane anesthesia, as in humans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Due to the absence of studies supporting the role of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in intradural spinal tumors, this study evaluates the clinical outcome after these surgeries in relation to the use of the advanced intraoperative neurophysiological techniques. Methods: This is an observational, descriptive and retrospective study of two cohort groups in relation to the presence or absence of IONM during the intervention and the subsequent evaluation of the clinical and functional results in the short and medium terms. Ninety-six patients with extra- or intramedullary intradural spinal tumors operated on by the neurosurgery team of our center completed the current study. Results: We observed improvements in the Prolo, Brice and McKissock and McCormick scales scores in the monitored patients. These results examine the usefulness of IONM to preserve neurological functions and, therefore, its impact on quality of life. The rate of neurological deficits in the unmonitored patients was 14.5%, whereas it was 8.3% of the patients whose treatment included IONM. Conclusions: It is important to emphasize the importance of implementing IONM for early recognition of possible neurological damage, the improvement of postoperative functional outcomes, and for decreasing the rate of neurological complications. Significance: This study provides reliable results on the importance of IONM in intradural spinal tumor surgeries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• In high-cervical intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery, unimpaired D-wave reliably predicts preserved gross-motor function for all covered spinal levels. • D-wave fails to predict the occurrence of mild permanent postoperative deficits affecting the fine-motor and compex hand function. • Only the combination of D-wave, mMEPs, EMG and SSEPs is able to provide a viable power for monitoring the complex hand function. D-wave can safely monitor the corticospinal-tract (CST)-function regarding gross-motor outcome of lower extremities, but it is still unknown whether i)D-wave can also safely monitor the gross-motor outcome of distal upper extremities in those patients undergoing high-cervical intramedullary-spinal-cord-tumor (IMSCT)-resection (enabling epidural D-wave-placement below C5) and ii)multimodal IONM can also predict fine-motor/complex hand function. We prospectively assessed 20 patients undergoing IMSCT-surgery above the C4/5-level with multimodal IONM (D-wave/mMEPs/EMG/SSEPs). Detailed gross-/fine-motor and complex hand function was assessed pre- and postoperatively and during long-term follow-up (mean:29.5 ± 18.8 months) and correlated with IONM-findings. D-wave monitoring was without intraoperative critical changes in all patients and none had any permanent postoperative gross-motor deficits. However, D-wave did not allow to predict the occurrence of mild permanent postoperative deficits affecting fine-motor function which was the case in 8% for distal upper extremities. The complex distal upper extremities' function assessed by Nine-Hole-Peg-Test (reflecting the complex motor/sensory interaction for hand-usability) was permanently deteriorated in 15% postoperatively and only the combination of D-wave/mMEPs/EMG/SSEPs was able to provide a viable predictive power (specificity:79%/sensitivity:43%). In high-cervical IMSCT-surgery, unimpaired D-wave reliably predicts preserved gross-motor function, but fails to sufficiently cover distal upper extremities' fine-motor/complex function. Our study underlines the importance of multimodal IONM for fine-motor/complex hand function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A craniotomy with cortical and subcortical mapping was planned for a 64-year-old male with a large right frontotemporal brain mass. Total intravenous anesthesia was performed, and 200 milligrams of succinylcholine was administered at induction. A train of four prior to head pinning (52 minutes after succinylcholine administration) revealed zero of four twitches in the left hand and foot. The patient did not regain spontaneous breathing despite discontinuation of infusions and the surgeon canceled the case at 108 minutes from induction. The patient was safely extubated at 270 minutes. Pseudocholinesterase deficiency was suspected, and labs revealed that the patient was outside of the normal range for pseudocholinesterase enzyme at 698 units/L with a dibucaine inhibition number of 40. The patient’s procedure was rescheduled 2 days later, and neuromuscular blockade was avoided. The procedure went ahead as planned with successful mapping and monitoring. This case highlights the effect of pseudocholinesterase deficiency on neuromonitoring and the importance of running train of four early on to detect neuromuscular junction issues in high-risk procedures. In this case, the surgeon was able to avoid pinning and positioning the patient and rescheduled the procedure so that motor mapping, direct cortical motor evoked potentials, and transcranial motor evoked potentials could be successfully performed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: During epilepsy surgery, it is equally important to record electrocorticography (ECoG) for detecting epileptogenic activity and guiding brain resection, and to evaluate neuromonitoring data, particularly motor evoked potentials (MEP), for avoidance of postoperative neurological complications. However, sevoflurane, which is commonly used during recording of ECoG, may attenuate the MEP response. It enforces anesthesiologists and neurosurgeons to select one anesthetic agent over another, facilitating either ECoG or MEP monitoring. Case presentation: In the presented case of a 20-year-old man, who underwent surgery for temporal lobe epilepsy, a novel technique of neuroanesthesia was introduced, integrating initial induction of the total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol (effect-site concentration, 2.3–3.0 μg/ml), its subsequent switching to sevoflurane (end-tidal concentration, 2.5%) for ECoG recording, and further change back to TIVA for MEP monitoring during brain resection. Conclusions: Intraoperative switch of anesthetic agents according to specific intraoperative requirements may be useful for cases of brain surgery requiring both ECoG recordings and MEP monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background We previously reported that normalization of motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring amplitude by compound muscle action potential (CMAP) after peripheral nerve stimulation prevented the expression of anesthetic fade (AF), suggesting that AF might be due to reduced synaptic transfer in the neuromuscular junction. Methods We calculated the time at which AF began for each of craniotomy and spinal cord surgery, and examined whether AF was avoided by CMAP after peripheral nerve stimulation normalization in each. Similar studies were also made with respect to the upper and lower limb muscles. Results AF was observed in surgery lasting 160 minutes for craniotomy and 260 minutes or more for spinal surgery, and 195 minutes in the upper limb muscles and 135 minutes in the lower limb muscles. In all the series, AF could be avoided by CMAP after peripheral nerve stimulation normalization. Conclusion AF of MEP occurred in both craniotomy and spinal cord surgery, and it was also corrected by CMAP after peripheral nerve stimulation. AF is considered to be mainly due to a decrease in synaptic transfer of the neuromuscular junction due to the accumulation of propofol because of the avoidance by CMAP normalization. However, it may be partially due to a decrease in the excitability of pyramidal tracts and α-motor neurons, because AF occurred earlier in the lower limb muscles than in the upper limb muscles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is shown to be useful in surgeries when the nervous system is at risk. Its success in part relies upon proper setup of often dozens of electrodes correctly placed and secured upon patients and inserted in specific stimulating and recording receptacles. Given the complicated setups and the demanding operating room environment, errors in setup are bound to occur. These have led to false negatives associated with new patient morbidities including, at times, paralysis. No studies quantify the prevalence of these types of setup errors. Approximately 800,000 operations annually utilize intraoperative neuromonitoring in the US alone, so even a small percentage of errors suggests clinical significance. In addition, these types of errors hinder the overall effectiveness of IONM and may result in lower reported sensitivities and lower cost-effectiveness of this important service. We sought to discover through a prospective study and verification through chart review the prevalence of "electrode-swap" errors (when recording and/or stimulating electrodes are incorrectly placed on the patient or in the IONM equipment during setup) across all procedures monitored. We found recording and/or stimulating electrode set up errors in 24 of 454 cases (5.3%). These data and examples of how errors were discovered intraoperatively are reported. We also offer techniques to help reduce this error rate. This study demonstrates a significant potential avoidable error in IONM diagnostic utility, patient outcome, and sensitivity/specificity of alert criteria. The value of identifying and correcting these errors is consequential, multifaceted, and far-reaching. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Tc-MEP are important to prevent intraoperative neurological deficit. • Post-tetanic Tc-MEPs (p-MEP) can augment the amplitudes of CMAPs. • Patients with preoperative motor deficit with MMT 3 and below highly needed p-MEP. • Using p-MEP in such cases increases the success rate of baseline MEP monitoring. Transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) are the current trend and are important in preventing intraoperative neurological deficits. Posttetanic Tc-MEPs (p-MEP) can augment the amplitudes of compound muscle active potentials (CMAPs), especially in the case of insufficient conventional Tc-MEPs (c-MEP). To retrospectively investigate pre- and intraoperative factors necessitating p-MEP monitoring and to examine changes in the success rates of baseline Tc-MEP monitoring before and after tetanic stimulation in patients with such factors. Retrospective observational study. Patients (n=184) who underwent spinal surgery with Tc-MEP monitoring in our department between August 2020 and July 2022. Manual muscle testing (MMT) scores were calculated to identify patients with preoperative motor deficits. c-MEP and p-MEP amplitudes were recorded from the defined muscles. We compared preoperative and intraoperative factors between the c-MEP and p-MEP groups (study 1). In cases where the factors were identified, we investigated the success rate of the baseline MEP measurement of each muscle before and after tetanic stimulation (study 2). One hundred fifty-seven patients were included. Of those, 87 showed sufficient CMAPs with c-MEP. Meanwhile, 70 needed p-MEP because of insufficient CMAPs. In univariate analysis, cervical/thoracic surgery (p<.001), preoperative MMT 3 or below (p=.009), shorter duration of illness (p=.037), previous cerebrovascular disease (p=.014), and dialysis (p=.031) were significantly associated with p-MEP group. Preoperative MMT 3 or below was the only factor requiring p-MEP (odds ratio, 3.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-8.73, p=.014) in multivariate analysis. In the p-MEP group, 24 patients had preoperative motor deficits; 16 patients with complete data were included in the analysis (study 2). The success rates of MEP monitoring before and after tetanic stimulation of the entire lower-extremity muscles were 42.7 and 57.3%, respectively (p<.001). The success rates for each muscle before and after tetanic stimulation were abductor pollicis brevis: 81.3% and 96.9%, tibialis anterior: 34.4% and 50.0%, gastrocnemius: 25% and 40.6%, and abductor hallucis: 68.8% and 81.3%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in success rates for any of the muscles. Patients with preoperative MMT 3 or below highly needed p-MEP. The success rate of baseline MEP monitoring increased with tetanic stimulation, even in patients with preoperative motor deficits. We believe that p-MEP monitoring can result in reliable CMAP recording, especially in cases of preoperative motor deficits with MMT scores of 3 or below. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials (TcMEPs) can improve intraoperative detection of femoral plexus and nerve root injury during lumbosacral spine surgery. However, even under ideal conditions, TcMEPs are not completely free of false-positive alerts due to the immobilizing effect of general anesthetics, especially in the proximal musculature. The application of transcutaneous stimulation to activate ventral nerve roots directly at the level of the conus medularis (bypassing the brain and spinal cord) has emerged as a method to potentially monitor the motor component of the femoral plexus and lumbosacral nerves free from the blunting effects of general anesthesia. To evaluate the reliability and efficacy of transabdominal motor evoked potentials (TaMEPs) compared to TcMEPs during lumbosacral spine procedures. We present the findings of a single-center 12-month retrospective experience of all lumbosacral spine surgeries utilizing multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) consisting of TcMEPs, TaMEPs, somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), electromyography (EMG), and electroencephalography. Two hundred and twenty patients having one, or a combination of lumbosacral spine procedures, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), posterior spinal fusion (PSF), and/or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Intraoperative neuromonitoring data was correlated to immediate postoperative neurologic examinations and chart review. Baseline reliability, false positive rate, true positive rate, false negative rate, area under the curve at baseline and at alerts, and detection of preoperative deficits of TcMEPs and TaMEPs were compared and analyzed for statistical significance. The relationship between transcutaneous stimulation voltage level and patient BMI was also examined. TaMEPs were significantly more reliable than TcMEPs in all muscles except abductor hallucis. Of the 27 false positive alerts, 24 were TcMEPs alone, and 3 were TaMEPs alone. Of the 19 true positives, none were detected by TcMEPs alone, 3 were detected by TaMEPs alone (TcMEPs were not present), and the remaining 16 true positives involved TaMEPs and TcMEPs. TaMEPs had a significantly larger area under the curve (AUC) at baseline than TcMEPs in all muscles except abductor hallucis. The percent decrease in TcMEP and TaMEP AUC during LLIF alerts was not significantly different. Both TcMEPs and TaMEPs reflected three preexisting motor deficits. Patient BMI and TaMEP stimulation intensity were found to be moderately positively correlated. These findings demonstrate the high reliability and predictability of TaMEPs and the potential added value when TaMEPs are incorporated into multimodality IONM during lumbosacral spine surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The balance between comprehensive intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) for both upper and lower limbs while ensuring the reliability of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) is paramount in motor area surgery. It is commonly difficult to obtain good simultaneous stimulation of both upper and lower limbs. A series of factors can bias MEP accuracy, and inappropriate stimulation intensity can result in unreliable monitoring. The presented IONM technique is based on the concurrent use of both transcranial and cortical strip electrodes to facilitate simultaneous monitoring of both upper and lower limbs at optimized stimulation intensities to increase IONM accuracy during motor area surgery. Ten nonconsecutive motor area tumors were studied. Good visualization of both limbs was observed in the series at a low amperage (1.2 mA from the strip electrode and 165.3 mA from the transcranial electrode). Our analysis confirms concordance between the IONM data and postoperative outcomes. An MEP reduction >20% and >50% correlated with postoperative modified Rankin scale score changes without false-negative IONM findings. The technique was demonstrated to be accurate in providing a good simultaneous neurophysiological evaluation of both upper and lower limbs with an optimized and stimulation amplitude. The technique results in a low encumbrance of electrodes in the surgical field. Our results have confirmed the "proof of concept," its reliability and feasibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Spine Research is the property of Japanese Society for Spine Surgery & Related Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

D-waves (also called direct waves) result from the direct activation of fast-conducting, thickly myelinated corticospinal tract (CST) fibres after a single electrical stimulus. During intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, D-waves are used to assess the long-term motor outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumours, selected cases of intradural extramedullary tumours and surgery for syringomyelia. In the present manuscript, we discuss D-wave monitoring and its role as a tool for monitoring the CST during spinal cord surgery. We describe the neurophysiological background and provide some recommendations for recording and stimulation, as well as possible future perspectives. Further, we introduce the concept of anti D-wave and present an illustrative case with successful recordings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Surgical decision‐making for congenital kyphosis (CK) with failure of anterior segmentation (type II) has been contradictory regarding the trade‐off between the pursuit of correction rate and the inherent risk of the osteotomy procedure. This study was designed to compare the clinical and radiographic measurement in type II CK underwent SRS‐Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy and vertebral column resection (VCR), the most‐adapted osteotomy techniques for CK, and to propose the strategy to select between the two procedures. Methods: This retrospective observational comparative study evaluated surgical outcomes in type II CK patients underwent VCR or SRS‐Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy at our institution between January 2015 and January 2020. Patients operated with VCR and SRS‐Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy were allocated to Group 1 and Group 2 respectively. Radiographic parameters and SRS‐22 quality of life metrics were assessed at pre‐operation, post‐operation, and during follow‐up visits for both groups, allowing for a comprehensive comparison of surgical outcomes. Results: Thirty‐one patients (19 patients in Group 1 and 12 patients in Group 2) aged 16.3 ± 10.4 years were recruited. Correction of segmental kyphosis was similar between groups (51.1 ± 17.6° in Group 1 and 48.4 ± 19.8° in Group 2, p = 0.694). Group 1 had significantly longer operation time (365.9 ± 81.2 vs 221.4 ± 78.9, p < 0.001) and more estimated blood loss (975.2 ± 275.8 ml vs 725.9 ± 204.3 mL, p = 0.011). Alert event of intraoperative sensory and motor evoked potential (SEP and MEP) monitoring was observed in 1 patient of Group 2. Both groups had 1 transient post operative neurological deficit respectively. Conclusion: SRS‐Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy was suitable for kyphotic mass when its apex is the upper unsegmented vertebrae or the neighboring disc, or when the apical vertebrae with an anterior/posterior (A/P) height ratio of vertebral body higher than 1/3. VCR is suitable when the apex is located within the unsegmented mass with its A/P height ratio lower than 1/3. Proper selection of VCR and SRS‐Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy according to our strategy, could provide satisfying radiographic and clinical outcomes in type II CK patients during a minimum of 2 years follow‐up. Patients undergoing VCR procedure might have longer operation time, more blood loss and higher incidence of peri‐ and post‐operative complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design. Retrospective review. Objective. Assess the feasibility of saphenous nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SN-SSEP) monitoring in lumbar spine surgeries. Background Context. SN-SSEPs have been proposed for detecting lumbar plexus and femoral nerve injury during lateral lumbar surgery where tibial nerve (TN) SSEPs alone are insufficient. SN-SSEPs may also be useful in other types of lumbar surgery, as stimulation of SN below the knee derives solely from the L4 root and provides a means of L4 monitoring, whereas TN-SSEPs often do not detect single nerve root injury. The feasibility of routine SNSSEP monitoring has not been established. Methods. A total of 563 consecutive cases using both TN-SSEP and SN-SSEP monitoring were included. Anesthesia was at the discretion of the anesthesiologist, using an inhalant in 97.7%of procedures. SN stimulation was performed using 13 mm needle electrodes placed below the knee using 200-400 μsec pulses at 15 to 100 mA. Adjustments to stimulation parameters were made by the neurophysiology technician while obtaining baselines. Data were graded retrospectively for monitorability and cortical response amplitudes were measured by two independent reviewers. Results. Ninety-eight percent of TN-SSEPs and 92.5% of SNSSEPs were monitorable at baseline, with a mean response amplitude of 1.35 μV for TN-SSEPs and 0.71 μV for SN-SSEPs. A significant difference between the stimulation parameters used to obtain reproducible TN and SN-SSEPs at baseline was observed, with SN-SSEPs requiring greater stimulation intensities. Body mass index is not associated with baseline monitorability. Out of 20 signal changes observed, 11 involved SN, while TN-SSEPs were unaffected. Conclusion. With adjustments to stimulation parameters, SNSSEP monitoring is feasible within a large clinical cohort without modifications to the anesthetic plan. Incorporating SN into standard intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring protocols for lumbar spine procedures may expand the role of SSEP monitoring to include detecting injury to the lumbar plexus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Spinal cord tumors represent a significant surgical challenge. Neurophysiological evaluation using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) is used to assess the function of motor and somatosensory pathways before and during surgery. However, its role with respect to the detection of neurological damage is not fully known. This study assesses the prognostic value of alterations of pre- and per-operative MEPs and SSEPs in a cohort of 67 patients undergoing spinal cord tumor surgery. We show that pre- and intraoperative alterations to MEPs and SSEPs are strongly associated with a risk of neurological deterioration 3 months after surgery that is independent of initial clinical severity, tumor size, or histological subtype. Leveraging a classical machine learning approach, it is possible to predict neurological outcomes with an accuracy of 84%. Thus, this study demonstrates the pivotal role of pre- and intraoperative neurophysiological explorations in detecting and preventing neurological suffering during spinal tumor surgery. Surgery for spinal cord tumors poses a significant challenge due to the inherent risk of neurological deterioration. Despite being performed at numerous centers, there is an ongoing debate regarding the efficacy of pre- and intraoperative neurophysiological investigations in detecting and preventing neurological lesions. This study begins by providing a comprehensive review of the neurophysiological techniques commonly employed in this context. Subsequently, we present findings from a cohort of 67 patients who underwent surgery for intradural tumors. These patients underwent preoperative and intraoperative multimodal somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs), with clinical evaluation conducted three months postoperatively. The study aimed to evaluate the neurophysiological, clinical, and radiological factors associated with neurological outcomes. In univariate analysis, preoperative and intraoperative potential alterations, tumor size, and ependymoma-type histology were linked to the risk of worsening neurological condition. In multivariate analysis, only preoperative and intraoperative neurophysiological abnormalities remained significantly associated with such neurological deterioration. Interestingly, transient alterations in intraoperative MEPs and SSEPs did not pose a risk of neurological deterioration. The machine learning model we utilized demonstrated the possibility of predicting clinical outcome, achieving 84% accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although several complications of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) have been reported, reports of arrhythmias during Tc-MEP are very rare. Case presentation: A 71-year-old woman underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under general anesthesia, with intraoperative Tc-MEP monitoring. Preoperative electrocardiography showed an incomplete right bundle branch block but no cardiovascular events in her life. After induction of anesthesia, Tc-MEP was recorded prior to the surgery. During the Tc-MEP monitoring, electrocardiography and arterial blood pressure showed a second-degree atrioventricular block, but it improved rapidly at the end of the stimulation, and the patient was hemodynamically stable. Tc-MEP was recorded seven times during surgery; the incidence of P waves without QRS complexes was significantly higher than before stimulation. The surgery was uneventful, and she was discharged eight days postoperatively without complications. Conclusions: Our case suggests that electrical stimulation for Tc-MEP can cause arrhythmia. Electrocardiography and blood pressure must be closely monitored during Tc-MEP monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is an acknowledged tool for real-time neuraxis assessment during surgery. Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) and transcranial motor evoked potential (MEP) are commonest deployed modalities of IONM. Role of SSEP and MEP in intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumor (IDEMSCT) surgery is not well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of SSEP and transcranial MEP, in detection of intraoperative neurological injury in IDEMSCT patients as well as their postoperative limb-specific neurological improvement assessment at fixed intervals till 30 days. Materials and Methods Symptomatic patients with IDEMSCTs were selected according to the inclusion criteria of study protocol. On modified McCormick (mMC) scale, their sensory-motor deficit was assessed both preoperatively and postoperatively. Surgery was done under SSEP and MEP (transcranial) monitoring using appropriate anesthetic agents. Gross total/subtotal resection of tumor was achieved as per IONM warning alarms. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of SSEP and MEP were calculated considering postoperative neurological changes as "reference standard." Patients were followed up at postoperative day (POD) 0, 1, 7, and 30 for convalescence. Statistical Analysis With appropriate tests of significance, statistical analysis was carried out. Receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to find cutoff point of mMC for SSEP being recordable in patients with higher neurological deficit along with calculation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of SSEP and MEP for prediction of intraoperative neurological injury. Results Study included 32 patients. Baseline mean mMC value was 2.59. Under neuromonitoring, gross total resection of IDEMSCT was achieved in 87.5% patients. SSEP was recordable in subset of patients with mMC value less than or equal to 2 with diagnostic accuracy of 100%. MEP was recordable in all patients and it had 96.88% diagnostic accuracy. Statistically significant neurological improvement was noted at POD-7 and POD-30 follow-up. Conclusion SSEP and MEP individually carry high diagnostic accuracy in detection of intraoperative neurological injuries in patients undergoing IDEMSCT surgery. MEP continues to monitor the neuraxis, even in those subsets of patients where SSEP fails to record. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Blink reflex (BR) amplitude deterioration can be used to predict postoperative facial nerve function, especially eyelid closure function. • Patients with BR amplitude deterioration ≥51.0% have a higher risk of postoperative eyelid closure deficits. • Patients with facial corticobulbar MEP (FCoMEP)(O. oris) amplitude deterioration ≥50.3% have a higher risk of postoperative facial paralysis. The current study examined the efficacy of the facial corticobulbar motor evoked potentials (FCoMEPs) and blink reflex (BR) on predicting postoperative facial nerve function during cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor surgery. Data from 110 patients who underwent CPA tumor resection with intraoperative FCoMEPs and BR monitoring were retrospectively reviewed. The association between the amplitude reduction ratios of FCoMEPs and BR at the end of surgery and postoperative facial nerve function was determined. Subsequently, the optimal threshold of FCoMEPs and BR for predicting postoperative facial nerve dysfunction were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Valid BR was record in 103 of 110 patients, whereas only 43 patients successfully recorded FCoMEP in orbicularis oculi muscle. A reduction over 50.3% in FCoMEP (O. oris) amplitude was identified as a predictor of postoperative facial nerve dysfunction (sensitivity, 77.1%; specificity, 83.6%). BR was another independent predictor of postoperative facial nerve deficit with excellent predictive performance, especially eyelid closure function. Its optimal cut-off value for predicting long-term postoperative eyelid closure dysfunction was was 51.0% (sensitivity, 94.4%; specificity, 94.4%). BR can compensate for the deficiencies of the FCoMEPs. The combination of BR and FCoMEPs can be used in CPA tumor surgery. The study first proposed an optimal cut-off value of BR amplitude deterioration (50.0%) for predicting postoperative eyelid closure deficits in patients undergoing CPA tumor surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gliomas adjacent to the corticospinal tract (CST) should be carefully resected to preserve motor function while achieving maximal surgical resection. Modern high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) enables precise visualization of the residual tumor and intraoperative tractography. We prospectively evaluated the extent of resection and distance between the tumor resection cavity and CST using 3-T iMRI combined with motor evoked potentials (MEP) in glioma surgery. Participants comprised patients who underwent surgery for solitary supratentorial glioma located within 10 mm of the CST. All cases underwent surgery using neuronavigation with overlaid CST under MEP monitoring. The correlation between distance from CST and transcortical MEP amplitude was calculated using Spearman rank correlation. Among the 63 patients who underwent surgery, 27 patients were enrolled in the study. Gross total resections were achieved in 26 of the 27 cases. Volumetric analysis showed the extent of resection was 98.6%. Motor function was stable or improved in 24 patients (Stable/Improved group) and deteriorated in 3 patients (Deteriorated group). All patients in the Deteriorated group showed motor deficit before surgery. Mean intraoperative minimal distance was significantly longer in the Stable/Improved group (7.3 mm) than in the Deteriorated group (1.1 mm; P < 0.05). MEP amplitude correlated with minimal distance between the resection cavity and CST (R = 0.64). Resection of gliomas adjacent to CST with a navigation system using 3-T iMRI could result in an ultimate EOR >98%. The combination of intraoperative tractography and MEP contributes to maximal removal of motor-eloquent gliomas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) were obtained in minimally invasive resection for glioma in awake and asleep patients. • Optimal stimulation and recording sites were guided by awake Penfield stimulation and analyzed in real time during surgery. • CCEP features were affected by tumor location and histopathology, and correlated with postoperative aphasia. We investigated the feasibility of recording cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) in patients with low- and high-grade glioma. We compared CCEPs during awake and asleep surgery, as well as those stimulated from the functional Broca area and recorded from the functional Wernicke area (BtW), and vice versa (WtB). We also analyzed CCEP properties according to tumor location, histopathology, and aphasia. We included 20 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery in an asleep-awake-asleep setting. Strip electrode placement was guided by classical Penfield stimulation of positive language sites and fiber tracking of the arcuate fascicle. CCEPs were elicited with alternating monophasic single pulses of 1.1 Hz frequency and recorded as averaged signals. Intraoperatively, there was no post-processing of the signal. Ninety-seven CCEPs from 19 patients were analyzed. There was no significant difference in CCEP properties when comparing awake versus asleep, nor BtW versus WtB. CCEP amplitude and latency were affected by tumor location and histopathology. CCEP features after tumor resection correlated with short- and long-term postoperative aphasia. CCEP recordings are feasible during minimally invasive surgery. CCEPs might be surrogate markers for altered connectivity of the language tracts. This study may guide the incorporation of CCEPs into intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article provides a consensus document on multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in neurosurgical procedures, focusing on basic fundamentals. Topics include guidelines for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, along with the application of evoked potentials in neuroanesthesia.

To evaluate the reliability of descending neurogenic evoked potentials (DNEP) monitoring in spinal deformity surgery under inhaled anesthesia. A total of 180 consecutive patients who underwent spinal deformity surgery in our scoliosis center from July 2014 to August 2016 were reviewed. Intraoperative monitoring including somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP), motor evoked potentials (MEP), and DNEP was conducted routinely throughout operation. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to anesthesia methods: group A (n = 72, inhaled anesthesia, SEP/DNEP) and group B (n = 108, total intravenous anesthesia, SEP/MEP/DNEP). Intraoperative monitoring data were collected and analyzed. Positive alerts were observed in 26 patients (14.5%), of whom 18 (10%) were confirmed as true-positive events in the study population. No false-negative events were recorded. In group A, the sensitivity and specificity of SEP and DNEP were 100% and 93.8% and 100% and 98.5%, respectively. For group B, the sensitivity and specificity of SEP/MEP and DNEP were 100% and 95.9% and 100% and 98%, respectively. DNEP monitoring seemed to be effective for the detection and prevention of iatrogenic neurologic deficits during spinal deformity surgery. This study indicates that DNEP was an effective alternative in spinal deformity surgery under inhaled anesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Head and neck positioning is a key element of craniofacial reconstructive surgery and can become challenging when intervention necessitates broad exposure of the calvarium. We present a case of craniosynostosis secondary to Apert's syndrome requiring anterior and posterior cranial vault access during surgical correction. A modified sphinx position was used that required significant neck extension. The patient had concurrent Chiari I malformation with brain stem compression so intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) was used to ensure that there were no negative effects on the neural elements with positioning. This highlights benefits of IONM in a setting not typically associated with its use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Postoperative hemiparesis following frontal lobe lesion resection is alarming, and predicting motor function recovery is challenging. Supplementary motor area (SMA) syndrome following resection of frontal lobe lesions is often indistinguishable from postoperative motor deficit due to surgical injury of motor tracts. We aimed to describe the use of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) with motor evoked potential monitoring data as a diagnostic tool to distinguish between SMA syndrome and permanent motor deficit (PMD). A retrospective analysis of 235 patients undergoing craniotomy and resection with TES-MEP monitoring for a frontal lobe lesion was performed. Patients who developed immediate postoperative motor deficit were included. Motor deficit and TES-MEP findings were categorized by muscle group as left upper extremity, left lower extremity, right upper extremity, or right lower extremity. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the predictive value of stable TES-MEP for SMA syndrome versus PMD. This study included 20 patients comprising 29 cases of immediate postoperative motor deficit by muscle group. Of these, 27 cases resolved and were diagnosed as SMA syndrome, and 2 cases progressed to PMD. TES-MEP stability was significantly associated with diagnosis of SMA syndrome (P = 0.015). TES-MEP showed excellent diagnostic utility with a sensitivity and positive predictive value of 100% and 92.6%, respectively. Negative predictive value was 100%. Temporary SMA syndrome is difficult to distinguish from PMD immediately postoperatively. TES-MEP may be a useful intraoperative adjunct that may aid in distinguishing SMA syndrome from PMD secondary to surgical injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the validity of intraoperative evoked potential (EP) including motor evoked potential (MEP) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) as a biomarker for predicting neural function changes after thoracic spinal decompression (TSD) surgery. Method: A consecutive series of 336 TSD surgeries were reviewed between 2010 and 2021 from four spine center. All patients with TSD were divided into 3 groups according to different intraoperative EP results: group 1, EP alerts; group 2, no obvious EP deterioration; group 3, EP improvement compared with baselines. The lower limb Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores (as well as early and long-term JOA recovery rate) were utilized to quantitatively assess pre- and postoperative neural function change. Results: Among the 3 subgroups according to the different EP changes, the early JOA recovery rate (RR%) in the EP improvement group was significantly better than the other two groups (51.3 ± 58.6* vs. 27.5 ± 31.2 and 33.3 ± 43.1; p < 0.01) after 3-month follow-up. The mean MEP and SEP amplitude were from 116 ± 57 µV to 347 ± 71 µV (p < 0.01) and from 1.86 ± 0.24 µV to 2.65 ± 0.29 µV (p < 0.01) between spinal cord pre-decompression and post-decompression. Moreover, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that risk factors of EP improvement were duration of symptom (p < 0.001, OR 10.9) and Preop. neurologic deficit degree (p = 0.013, OR 7.46). Conclusion: The intraoperative EP can predict postoperative neural function changes as a biomarker during TSD. Patient with EP improvement probably has better prognosis for early neural function recovery. The duration of symptom and preoperative neurologic deficit degree may be related to intraoperative EP improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Combined somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential (SSEP and MEP) changes for predicting prognosis in thoracic spinal surgery have been variably reported. We aimed to explore the validity of combined SSEP and MEP for predicting postoperative motor deficits (PMDs) in thoracic spinal decompression surgery (TSDS) and identify a relatively optimal neurophysiological predictor of PMDs in patients based on preoperative motor status. Retrospective study. A total of 475 patients were analyzed. A reduction in muscle strength by more than or equal to one manual muscle testing (MMT) grade postoperatively compared with the preoperative MMT grade was identified as PMDs. Postoperative motor deficits were detected by comparing the preoperative and postoperative physical examination findings in short- and long-term follow-up visits. All patients were divided into two subgroups according to preoperative motor status. The following data were collected: (1) demographic data; (2) IONM (intraoperative neuromonitoring) data; and (3) postoperative motor outcomes. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of IONM change to predict PMDs. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to establish optimal IONM warning criteria. Ninety-eight patients had severe preoperative motor deficits (Group S), and 377 patients did not (Group N). MEP and SSEP change was effective for predicting PMDs in the short term (p<.01) and long term (p<.01) for TSDS patients. In Group N, the cutoff values for predicting PMDs in the short term were a decrease of 65% in SSEP amplitude and 89.5% in MEP amplitude of the baseline value. Furthermore, the cutoff values for predicting PMDs in the short term were durations of change of 24.5 minutes for SSEP and 32.5 minutes for MEP. In Group S, however, the cutoff values for predicting PMDs in the short term were a decrease of 36.5% in SSEP amplitude and 59.5% in MEP amplitude of the baseline value. Moreover, the critical values for predicting short-term PMDs were durations of change of 16.5 minutes for SSEP and 17.5 minutes for MEP. The optimal IONM changes for prediction vary depending on preoperative motor status. Combined SSEP and MEP are excellent for predicting PMDs in TSDS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: During scoliosis surgery, motor evoked potentials (MEP), and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) have been reported to be affected by the use of higher doses of anesthetic agents. Dexmedetomidine, a sympatholytic agent, an alpha‐2 receptor agonist, has been used as an adjunctive agent to lower anesthetic dose. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the effects of dexmedetomidine on the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of MEP and SSEP during surgery, particularly among pediatric patients. Objectives: This systematic review aimed to determine whether, during spinal fusion surgery in pediatric patients with scoliosis, dexmedetomidine alters MEP amplitude or SSEP latency and amplitude and, if so, whether different doses of dexmedetomidine display different effects (PROSPERO registration number CRD42022300562). Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library on January 1, 2022 and included randomized controlled trials, observational cohort and case–control studies and case series investigating dexmedetomidine in the population of interest and comparing against a standardized anesthesia regimen without dexmedetomidine or comparing multiple doses of dexmedetomidine. Animal and in vitro studies and conference abstracts were excluded. Results: We found substantial heterogeneity in the risk of bias (per Cochrane‐preferred tools) of the included articles (n = 5); results are summarized without meta‐analysis. Articles with the lowest risk of bias indicated that dexmedetomidine was associated with MEP loss and that higher doses of dexmedetomidine increased risk. In contrast, articles reporting no association between dexmedetomidine and MEP loss suffered from higher risk of bias, including suspected or confirmed problems with confounding, outcome measurement, participant selection, results reporting, and lack of statistical transparency and power. Conclusion: Given the limitations of the studies available in the literature, it would be advisable to conduct rigorous randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes to assess the effects of dexmedetomidine use of in scoliosis surgery in pediatric patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEP) monitoring is a common practice in neurosurgery to prevent postoperative neurological damage. However, the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) during Tc-MEP monitoring is a subject of controversy. In addition, the effectiveness of sugammadex, a selective reversal agent, in the context of Tc-MEP monitoring requires further investigation. This review aimed to clarify the considerations involved in achieving optimal Tc-MEP monitoring while ensuring patient safety. Preoperative patient selection, comorbidity assessment, motor power evaluation, and the nature of the planned surgery are critical factors. Accurate paralysis assessment, continuous NMBA infusion, and post-tetanic stimulation techniques are essential for achieving optimal partial NMB. The decision to administer an NMB during Tc-MEP monitoring necessitates a careful evaluation of the balance between accuracy and potential complications. This review emphasizes the challenges associated with NMB administration during Tc-MEP monitoring and highlights the need for personalized patient assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document, titled "Neuromonitoring during STA-MCA bypass," discusses the use of neuro-monitoring techniques during superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass surgery. STA-MCA bypass is a procedure used to revascularize the brain when one of the main arteries supplying blood to the brain is affected by disease or abnormal structures. Neuro-monitoring is an important tool used during surgical procedures to assess and protect vital structures, estimate blood flow, detect ischemia, and achieve better functional outcomes for patients. The neuro-monitoring modalities discussed in this document include electroencephalogram (EEG), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), motor evoked potentials (MEP), and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). These techniques help to prevent neurological injuries and improve postoperative outcomes. [Extracted from the article]

Purpose: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) aims to preserve facial nerve (FN) function during vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery. However, current techniques such as facial nerve motor evoked potentials (FNMEP) or electromyography (fEMG) alone are limited in predicting postoperative facial palsy (FP). The objective of this study was to analyze a compound fEMG/FNMEP approach. Methods: Intraoperative FNMEP amplitude and the occurrence of fEMG-based A-trains were prospectively determined for the orbicularis oris (ORI) and oculi (OCU) muscle in 322 VS patients. Sensitivity and specificity of techniques to predict postoperative FN function were calculated. Confounding factors as tumor size, volume of intracranial air, or IONM duration were analyzed. Results: A relevant immediate postoperative FP was captured in 105/322 patients with a significant higher risk in large VS. While fEMG demonstrated a high sensitivity (77% and 86% immediately and 15 month postoperative, respectively) for identifying relevant FP, specificity was low. In contrast, FNMEP have a significantly higher specificity of 80.8% for predicting postoperative FP, whereas the sensitivity is low. A retrospective combination of techniques demonstrated still an incorrect prediction of FP in ~ 1/3 of patients. Conclusions: FNMEP and fEMG differ in sensitivity and specificity to predict postoperative FP. Although a combination of IONM techniques during VS surgery may improve prediction of FN function, current techniques are still inaccurate. Further development is necessary to improve IONM approaches for FP prediction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Despite advances in surgical and imaging techniques, intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCTs) still represent a challenge. Surgical removal of IMCTs carries a substantial risk of spinal cord injury and neurologic morbidity. This study aimed to assess the predictive potential of multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) for functional outcomes in IMSCTs. Clinical data were collected from 64 patients who underwent surgery between 2011 and 2020. Monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) was conducted for all patients, while a D-waves recording was obtained in 57 patients. Postoperative neurologic outcomes were measured with Frankel and modified McCormick scales. D-wave monitoring provided valuable insights into motor outcomes, enabling us to proceed with surgery even in cases where MEPs/SSEPs were lost. D-wave monitoring demonstrated superior accuracy and predictive ability compared to MEPs and SSEPs alone. Multimodal IONM has the potential to significantly enhance the extent of tumor resection while minimizing the risk of neurological morbidity in IMSCT surgery. Objective: The study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and the ability of D-wave monitoring combined with somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to predict functional outcomes in intramedullary spinal cord tumor (IMSCT) surgery. Methods: Between December 2011 and December 2020, all patients harboring IMSCT who underwent surgery at our institution were prospectively collected in a surgical spinal registry and retrospectively analyzed. Patient charts and surgical and histological reports were analyzed. The multimodal IONM included SSEPs, MEPs, and—whenever possible—D-waves. All patients were evaluated using the modified McCormick and Frankel grade at admission and 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. Results: Sixty-four patients were enrolled in the study. SSEP and MEP monitoring was performed in all patients. The D-wave was not recordable in seven patients (11%). Significant IONM changes (at least one evoked potential modality) were registered in 26 (41%) of the 64 patients. In five cases (8%) where the SSEPs and MEPs lost and the D-wave permanently dropped by about 50%, patients experienced a permanent deterioration of their neurological status. Multimodal IONM (SSEP, MEP, and D-wave neuromonitoring) significantly predicted postoperative deficits (p = 0.0001), with a sensitivity of 100.00% and a specificity of 95.65%. However, D-waves demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (100%) than MEPs (62.5%) and SSEPs (71.42%) alone. These tests' specificities were 85.10%, 13.89%, and 17.39%, respectively. Comparing the area under ROC curves (AUCs) of these evoked potentials in 53 patients (where all three modalities of IONM were registered) using the pairwise t-test, D-wave monitoring appeared to have higher accuracy and ability to predict postoperative deficits with strong statistical significance compared with MEP and SSEP alone (0.992 vs. 0.798 vs. 0.542; p = 0.018 and p < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of multimodal IONM showed a statistically significant greater ability to predict postoperative deficits compared with SSEP, MEP, and D-wave monitoring alone. D-wave recording significantly increased the accuracy and clinical value of neurophysiological monitoring in IMSCT tumor resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Surgical decisions for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) primarily depend on clinical symptoms and radiological examinations. Preoperative evoked potential testing is a functional diagnostic tool that can indicate the severity of myelopathic symptoms in patients with DCM. Additionally, preoperative tibial nerve-somatosensory evoked potential has significant prognostic value in predicting postoperative clinical outcomes. Thus, preoperative evoked potential tests are significantly helpful in determining suitable surgical treatment and forecasting postoperative prognosis. Decompression surgery is a treatment option for patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Surgical decisions primarily depend on clinical symptoms and radiological examinations. The diagnostic and prognostic significance of evoked potential tests for surgical outcomes in patients with DCM has not been thoroughly examined. To identify the diagnostic and prognostic significance of preoperative evoked potential tests in patients with DCM who underwent decompression surgery. This was a retrospective observational study. One hundred two consecutive patients who underwent evoked potential tests and surgical treatment between January 2016 and December 2020 in a single spine center and had a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores obtained preoperatively and 6 months after surgery. This study evaluated the preoperative central motor conduction time (CMCT), somatosensory evoked potentials, and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores obtained preoperatively and 6 months after surgery. Abnormal CMCT findings were observed in 94 patients (92.2%). Abnormal somatosensory evoked potentials were observed in 77 patients (75.5%). There was a statistically significant correlation between preoperative JOA score and abductor pollicis brevis (APB)-CMCT (r=−0.546, p =.001), tibialis anterior (TA)-CMCT (r=−0.517, p <.001), median nerve (MN)-SSEP (r=−0.353, p =.001), and tibial nerve (TN)-SSEP (r=−0.349, p =.003). There were significant differences in recovery rates associated with diabetes mellitus (DM), preoperative severity of myelopathy, TA-CMCT, MN-SSEP, and TN-SSEP. Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the major factors affecting the clinical outcomes were TN-SSEP (β=0.327, p=.004), preoperative JOA score (β=0.278, p=.012), and DM (β=0.241, p=.025). Evoked potential testing is a functional diagnostic tool that can indicate the severity of myelopathic symptoms in patients with DCM. Additionally, preoperative TN-SSEP may have significant prognostic value in predicting postoperative clinical outcomes. Thus, preoperative evoked potential tests could be helpful for determining suitable surgical treatment candidates and forecasting postoperative prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Among the technical measures to preserve facial nerve (FN) function, intraoperative neuromonitoring has become mandatory and is constantly being scrutinized. Hence, to determine the efficacy of FN motor evoked potentials (FNMEPs) in predicting long-term motor FN function following cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor surgery, an analysis of cases was done. Methods: In 37 patients who underwent CPA surgery, FNMEPs through corkscrew electrodes positioned at C5-C6 and C6-C5 (C is the central line of the brain as per 10-20 EEG electrode placement) were used to deliver short train stimuli and recorded from the orbicularis oculi, oris, and mentalis muscles. Results: In 58 patients, triggered electromyography (EMG) was able to identify the FN during resection of tumor, but 8 out of these (4.64%) patients developed new facial weakness, whereas 3 out of 38 (1.11%) patients who had intact FN function MEP (decrement of FN target muscles - CMAPs amplitude peak to peak >50-60%), developed new facial weakness (House and Brackmann grade II to III). Conclusion: The FNMEP has significant superiority over triggered EMG when tumor is giant and envelops the FN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiovascular surgery has a high risk of neurological complications, which can increase the burden of disease. Perioperative real-time monitoring of neurological function in cardiovascular surgery can assist clinicians to detect neurological abnormalities as early as possible, intervene and reduce the risk of neurological complications in time. The main monitoring indicators include cerebral oxygen saturation (ScO2), EEG, cerebral blood flow (CBF), etc. In this paper, the common perioperative neuromonitoring techniques and their research advances in cardiovascular surgery are reviewed to provide theoretical basis for reducing neurological complications and improve the prognosis of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Considering spinal deformity patients with pre‐operative neurological deficit were associated with more intra‐operative iatrogenic neurological complications than those without, intra‐operative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has been used for detecting possible iatrogenic injury timely. However, the IONM waveforms are often unreliable. To analyze the performance of intra‐operative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) including somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEP) in patients with pre‐operative neurological deficit undergoing posterior spinal correction surgery, and to identify the high‐risk factors for failed IONM. Methods: Patients with pre‐operative neurological deficit undergoing posterior spinal correction surgery between October 2017 and January 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The presence or absence of SEP and MEP of target muscles were separately recorded. The P37/N50 latency and amplitude of SEP, and the MEP amplitude were measured. Any IONM alerts were also recorded. The IONM performance was compared among patients with different etiologies, levels responsible for neurological deficit, and strength of IONM‐target muscles. Patients' demographics were analyzed using the descriptive statistics and were presented with mean ± standard deviation. Comparison analysis was performed using χ2‐test and statistically significant difference was defined as p < 0.05. Results: A total of 270 patients (147 males, 123 females) with an average age of 48.4 ± 36.7 years were involved. The SEP records were available in 371 (68.7%) lower extremities while MEP records were available in 418 (77.4%). SEP alerts were reported in 31 lower extremities and MEP alerts in 22, and new neurological deficit at post‐operation was observed in 11. The etiologies of neuromuscular and syndromic indicated relatively lower success rates of IONM, which were 44.1% and 40.5% for SEP, and 58.8% and 59.5% for MEP (p < 0.001). In addition, patients with pre‐operative neurological deficit caused by cervical spine and muscle strength lower than grade 4 suffered from higher risk of failed IONM waveforms (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients with pre‐operative neurological deficit suffered from a higher incidence of failed IONM results. The high‐risk for failed IONM waveforms included the neuromuscular and syndromic etiologies, neurological deficit caused by cervical spine, muscle strength lower than grade 4 in patients with pre‐operative neurological deficit undergoing posterior spinal correction surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Gliomas have infiltrative nature and tumor volume has direct prognostic value. Optimal resection limits delineated by high-frequency monopolar stimulation with multipulse short train technique is still a matter of debate for safe surgery without (or with acceptable) neurological deficits. It is also an enigma whether the same cut-off values are valid for high and low grades. We aimed to analyze the value of motor mapping/monitoring findings on postoperative motor outcome in diffuse glioma surgery. Methods: Patients who were operated on due to glioma with intraoperative neuromonitorization at our institution between 2017 and 2021 were analyzed. Demographic information, pre- and post-operative neurological deficit, magnetic resonance images, resection rates, and motor evoked potential (MEP) findings were analyzed. Results: Eighty-seven patients of whom 55 had high-grade tumors were included in the study. Total/near-total resection was achieved in 85%. Subcortical motor threshold (ScMTh) from resection cavity to the corticospinal tract was ≤ 2mA in 17; 3 mA in 14; 4 mA in 6; 5 mA in 7, and ≥5mA in 50 patients. On the 6th month examination, six patients (5 with high-grade tumor) had motor deficits. These patients had changes in MEP that exceeded critical threshold during monitoring. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed 2.5 mA ScMTh as the cut-off point for limb paresis after awakening and 6 months for the groups. Conclusions: Subcortical mapping with MEP monitoring helps to achieve safe wider resection. The optimal safe limit for SCMTh was determined as 2.5 mA. Provided that safe threshold values are maintained in MEP, surgeon may force the functional limits by lowering the SCMTh to 1 mA, especially in low-grade gliomas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The accuracy of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) during surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to detect iatrogenic nervous system injuries while they are reversible remains unknown. We evaluated a cohort of patients who had IONM during surgery to assess accuracy. Methods Patients who underwent surgical treatment of CSM that included IONM from January 2018 through August 2018 were retrospectively identified. A standardized protocol was used for operative management. Clinical changes and postoperative neurological deficits were evaluated. Results Among 131 patients in whom IONM was used during their procedure, 42 patients (age 58.2 ± 16.3 years, 54.8% males) showed IONM changes and 89 patients had no change. The reasons for IONM changes varied, and some patients had changes detected via multiple modalities: electromyography (n = 25, 59.5%), somatosensory-evoked potentials (n = 14, 33.3%), motor evoked potentials (n = 13, 31.0%). Three patients, all having baseline deficits before surgery, had postoperative deficits. Among the 89 patients without an IONM change, 4 showed worsened postoperative deficits, which were also seen at last follow-up. The sensitivity of IONM for predicting postoperative neurological change was 42.86% and the specificity was 68.55%. However, most patients (124, 94.7%) in whom IONM was used showed no worsened neurological deficit. Conclusion IONM shows potential in ensuring stable postoperative neurological outcomes in most patients; however, its clinical use and supportive guidelines remain controversial. In our series, prediction of neurological deficits was poor in contrast to some previous studies. Further refinement of clinical and electrophysiological variables is needed to uniformly predict postoperative neurological outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) represents a treatment option for refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TGN). Usually, patients need to be awake during surgery to confirm a correct position of the epidural electrode above the motor cortex, reducing patient's comfort. Method: Epidural cortical mapping (ECM) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were intraoperatively performed for correct localization of motor cortex under general anesthesia that provided comparable results to test stimulation after letting the patient to be awake during the operation. Conclusion: Intraoperative ECM and MEPs facilitate a confirmation of correct MCS-electrode position above the motor cortex allowing the MCS-procedure to be performed under general anesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: Thalamus is a high eloquent brain region, because it contains important relay nucleus and is surrounded by vital neural and vascular structures. Cavernous malformations involving deep structures such as the basal ganglia and thalamus account for 5-10% of all cerebral cavernomas and can cause devastating neurological deficits. Surgical approach to thalamic cavernomas is associated with risks of new or worsening neurologic deficits. The benefit of surgery must be carefully weighed on an individualized basis. There are several surgical routes that can be used to approach thalamic lesions, mainly transcortical and interhemispheric approaches. A particular approach should be selected based on the location of the cavernoma in the thalamus to minimize lesion of the unaffected brain. METHODS: We present the case of a 43-year-old right-handed lady with right bleeding posterolateral thalamic cavernoma, admitted to the neurosurgery department of Sibiu MedLife Polisano Hospital in February 2024. The patient underwent surgery, through a transcortical trans-sulcal para-fascicular, navigation guided approach. Preoperative tractography imaging, tubular cerebral corridor retractor system and intraoperative monitoring of the cortico-spinal tract, through motor evoked potentials (transcortical, cortical and subcortical mapping) and of the spinotahamic tract through somatosensory evoked potentials were used. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the 7th postoperative day. CONCLUSIONS: Thalamus is a complex structure located in a deep brain area and surgery for these region carries high risks, so the surgeon must carefully tailor these patients. The transcortical transsulcal parafascicular approach is feasible and safe using the cerebral tubular corridor, neuronavigation and neuromonitoring. Advanced surgical technology offers the advantages of minimizing the risks of new neurological deficits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The anaesthetic agents can affect the quality of motor-evoked potential intraoperatively as they inhibit synaptic transmission. Intravenous anaesthetics suppress motor-evoked potential lesser than inhalational agents, so total intravenous anaesthesia or a combination of intravenous with minimal inhalational anaesthetic supplementation is used when motor-evoked potential is monitored. Motor-evoked potential can get depressed at high doses of propofol required to maintain surgical depth, hence, adjuvant agents like dexmedetomidine that maintain anaesthetic depth without affecting the motor-evoked potential are often required. This study was a prospective non-randomized and comparative study (quasi-experimental) assigned into two groups of 64 each, labelled as the propofol group (group P) and Propofol + dexmedetomidine group (group PD). The primary objective of our study was to compare the total dose reduction of propofol with the addition of dexmedetomidine and their interference with motor-evoked potential readings. The secondary objective was to assess the hemodynamic changes, changes in amplitude and latency of motor-evoked potential, and complications if any. Results: The mean total dose of propofol consumed in our study was 502.81 ± 71.01 mg in group propofol(P) and 392.18 ± 59.00 mg in group propofol + dexmedetomidine (PD). Moreover, the mean total dose of propofol (mg) was significantly less used in group PD. Intraoperative hemodynamic stability, no difference in amplitude and latency for motor-evoked potential, and only significant bradycardia in group propofol + dexmedetomidine (PD). Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine can be successfully used in propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia for motor-evoked potential monitoring in spine surgeries, but it is better to maintain stable hemodynamics with a significant reduction of the mean dose of propofol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It remains unclear whether spinal cord untethering is necessary to reduce the chances of neurologic decline in children with myelomeningocele and complex closed spinal dysraphism who undergo thoracolumbar fusion for scoliosis. We sought to determine the neurologic and functional outcomes of children with spinal dysraphism undergoing spinal fusion for scoliosis with and without prophylactic spinal cord untethering. Retrospective, single-center review of patients with spinal dysraphism treated with thoracolumbar fusion over the last 10 years (2009–2019) with or without prophylactic spinal cord untethering. Seventeen patients with myelomeningocele and complex closed spinal dysraphism underwent spinal fusion for scoliosis. Mean age at time of surgery was 13.9 years. Prophylactic spinal cord untethering was performed in 8 of 17 (47%) patients. The change in Cobb angle after surgery was similar between the 2 groups (19.4° untethered vs. 19.9° no untethering). The ambulatory status was similar between the groups, with 37% of the untethered cohort and 44% of the non-untethered cohort being community or household ambulators. There were no changes in intraoperative motor or sensory evoked potentials in any patient during fusion surgery. No patient had a change in motor level or ambulatory status after scoliosis surgery. Our data suggest that prophylactic spinal cord untethering in children with spinal dysraphism undergoing thoracolumbar fusion for scoliosis may not be necessary in patients with moderate curvatures. Our conclusions are limited by the small sample size. A larger review of registry data may yield more powerful conclusions on the necessity of prophylactic spinal cord untethering in this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Shortly after finishing the paper on the History of Intraoperative Neurophysiology for this year's I Child's Nervous System i Annual Issue, on September 12th, I received the shocking news that Dr. Vedran Deletis suddenly passed away in Stari Grad, Croatia, at the age of 77. In 1987, Dr. Deletis was invited to New York City to join the Pediatric Neurosurgery team at the New York University (NYU), led by Fred Epstein. First at NYU and then at the INN, Deletis established a unique fellowship program in Intraoperative Neurophysiology where not only neurophysiologists but also neurosurgeons from all over the world were trained (Fig. [Extracted from the article]

The relationships between the results of pre- and intraoperative motor evoked potential recordings during neuromonitoring and whether idiopathic scoliosis (IS) surgical correction improves the spinal efferent transmission have not been specified in detail. This study aims to compare the results of surface-recorded electromyography (EMG), electroneurography (ENG, M, and F-waves), and especially motor evoked potential (MEP) recordings from tibialis anterior muscle (TA) bilaterally in 353 girls with right idiopathic scoliosis (types 1–3 according to Lenke classification). It has not yet been documented whether the results of MEP recordings induced by transcranial single magnetic stimulus (TMS, pre- and postoperatively) and trains of electrical stimuli (TES; intraoperatively in T0—before surgery, T1—after pedicle screws implantation, and T2—after scoliosis curvature distraction and derotation following two-rod implantation) can be compared for diagnostic verification of the improvement of spinal cord neural transmission. We attempted to determine whether the constant level of optimal anesthesia during certain surgical steps of scoliosis treatment affects the parameters of MEPs recorded during neuromonitoring procedures. No neurological deficits have been observed postoperatively. The values of amplitudes but not latencies in MEP recordings evoked with TMS in IS patients compared before and after surgery indicated a slight improvement in efferent neural transmission. The results of all neurophysiological studies in IS patients were significantly asymmetrical and recorded worse on the concave side, suggesting greater neurological motor deficits at p = 0.04. The surgeries brought significant improvement (p = 0.04) in the parameters of amplitudes of sEMG recordings; however, the consequences of abnormalities in the activity of TA motor units were still reflected. ENG study results showed the symptoms of the axonal-type injury in peroneal motor fibers improving only on the concave side at p = 0.04, in parallel with F-wave parameters, which suggests that derotation and distraction might result in restoring the proper relations of the lumbar ventral roots in the spinal central canal, resembling their decompression. There were no significant differences detected in the amplitudes or latencies of MEPs induced with TMS or TES when comparing the parameters recorded preoperatively and intraoperatively in T0. The amplitudes of TES-evoked MEPs increased gradually at p = 0.04 in the subsequent periods (T1 and T2) of observation. A reduction in MEP latency at p = 0.05 was observed only at the end of the IS surgery. Studies on the possible connections between the level of anesthesia fluctuations and the required TMS stimulus strength, as well as the MEP amplitude changes measured in T0–T2, revealed a lack of relationships. These might not be the factors influencing the efferent transmission in spinal pathways beside the surgical procedures. Pre- (TMS-evoked) and intraoperative (TES-evoked) recordings are reliable for evaluating the patient's neurological status before and during surgical scoliosis correction procedures. An increase in MEP amplitude parameters recorded on both sides after scoliosis surgery proves the immediate improvement of the total efferent spinal cord transmission. Considering comparative pre- and postoperative sEMG and ENG recordings, it can be concluded that surgeries might directly result in additional lumbar ventral root decompression. We can conclude that MEP parameter changes are determined by the surgery procedures during neuromonitoring, not the anesthesia conditions if they are kept stable, which influences a decrease in the number of false-positive neuromonitoring warnings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Intraoperative muscle motor evoked potentials (m-MEPs) are widely used in spinal surgery with the aim of identifying a damage to spinal cord at a reversible stage. Generally, lower limb m-MEPs are recorded from abductor hallucis [AH] and the tibialis anterior [TA]. The purpose of this work is to study an unselected population by recording the m-MEPs from TA, AH and extensor digitorum brevis (EDB), with the aim of identifying the most adjustable and stable muscles responses intraoperatively. Methods: Transcranially electrically induced m-MEPs were intraoperative recorded in a total of 107 surgical procedures. m-MEPs were recorded by a needle electrode placed in the muscle from TA, AH and EDB muscles in the lower extremities. Results: Overall monitorability (i.e., at least 1 Lower Limb m-MEP recordable) was 100/107 (93.5%). In the remaining 100 surgeries in 3 cases, the only muscle that could be recorded at baseline was one AH, and in other 2 the EDB. Persistence (i.e., the recordability of m-MEP from baseline to the end of surgery) was 88.7% for TA, 89.8% for AH and 93.8% for EDB. Conclusion: In our series, EDB m-MEPs have demonstrated a recordability superior to TA and a stability similar to AH. The explanations may be different and range from changes in the excitability of the cortical motor neuron to the different sensitivity to ischemia of the spinal motor neuron. EDB can be used alternatively or can be added to TA and AH as a target muscle of the lower limb in spinal surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A prospective multicenter observational cohort study. Objective. This study aimed to investigate the role of transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring during traumatic spinal injury surgery, the timing of TcMEP alerts, and intervention strategies to avoid intraoperative neurological complications. Summary of Background Data. Intraoperative neuromonitoring, including TcMEP monitoring, is commonly used in high-risk spinal surgery to predict intraoperative spinal cord injury; however, little information is available on its use in traumatic spinal injury surgery. Methods. The TcMEP monitoring data of 350 consecutive patients who underwent traumatic spinal injury surgery (mean age, 69.3 y) between 2017 and 2021 were prospectively reviewed. In this study, a TcMEP amplitude reduction =70% was established as a TcMEP alert. A rescue case was defined as a case with the recovery of TcMEP amplitudes after certain procedures and without postoperative neurological complications. Results. Among the 350 patients who underwent traumatic spinal injury surgery (TcMEP derivation rate 94%), TcMEP monitoring revealed seven true-positive (TP) (2.0%), three rescues (0.9%; rescue rate 30%), 31 false-positive, one false-negative, and 287 true-negative cases, resulting in 88% sensitivity, 90% specificity, 18% positive predictive value, and 99% negative predictive value. The TP rate in patients with preoperative motor deficits was 2.9%, which was higher than that in patients without preoperative motor deficits (1.1%). The most common timing of TcMEP alerts was during decompression (40%). During decompression, suspension of surgery with intravenous steroid injection was ineffective (rescue rate, 0%), and additional decompression was effective. Conclusion. Given the low prevalence of neurological complications (2.3%) and the low positive predictive value (18.4%), single usage of TcMEP monitoring during traumatic spinal injury surgery is not recommended. Further efforts should be made to reduce FP alert rates through better interpretation of multimodal Intraoperative neuromonitorings and the incorporation of anesthesiology to improve the positive predictive value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective multicenter cohort study Objectives: We aimed to clarify the efficacy of multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), especially in transcranial electrical stimulation of motor-evoked potentials (TES-MEPs) with spinal cord-evoked potentials after transcranial stimulation of the brain (D-wave) in the detection of reversible spinal cord injury in high-risk spinal surgery. Methods: We reviewed 1310 patients who underwent TES-MEPs during spinal surgery at 14 spine centers. We compared the monitoring results of TES-MEPs with D-wave vs TES-MEPs without D-wave in high-risk spinal surgery. Results: There were 40 cases that used TES-MEPs with D-wave and 1270 cases that used TES-MEPs without D-wave. Before patients were matched, there were significant differences between groups in terms of sex and spinal disease category. Although there was no significant difference in the rescue rate between TES-MEPs with D-wave (2.0%) and TES-MEPs (2.5%), the false-positivity rate was significantly lower (0%) in the TES-MEPs-with-D-wave group. Using a one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis, 40 pairs of patients from the two groups were selected. Baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between the matched groups. In the score-matched analysis, one case (2.5%) in both groups was a case of rescue (P = 1), five (12.5%) cases in the TES-MEPs group were false positives, and there were no false positives in the TES-MEPs-with-D-wave group (P =.02). Conclusions: TES-MEPs with D-wave in high-risk spine surgeries did not affect rescue case rates. However, it helped reduce the false-positivity rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It remains unclear whether tractography of pyramidal tracts is correlated with the intraoperative direct electrical subcortical stimulation (DESS), and brain shift further complicates the issue. The objective of this research is to quantitatively verify the correlation between optimized tractography (OT) of pyramidal tracts after brain shift compensation and DESS during brain tumor surgery. OT was performed for 20 patients with lesions in proximity to the pyramidal tracts based on preoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. During surgery, tumor resection was guided by DESS. A total of 168 positive stimulation points and their corresponding stimulation intensity thresholds were recorded. Using the brain shift compensation algorithm based on hierarchical B-spline grids combined with a Gaussian resolution pyramid, we warped the preoperative pyramidal tract models and used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to investigate the reliability of our brain shift compensation method based on anatomic landmarks. Additionally, the minimum distance between the DESS points and warped OT (wOT) model was measured and correlated with DESS intensity threshold. Brain shift compensation was achieved in all cases, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.96 in the registration accuracy analysis. The minimum distance between the DESS points and the wOT model was found to have a significantly high correlation with the DESS stimulation intensity threshold (r = 0.87, P < 0.001), with a linear regression coefficient of 0.96. Our OT method can provide comprehensive and accurate visualization of the pyramidal tracts for neurosurgical navigation and was quantitatively verified by intraoperative DESS after brain shift compensation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]