Search

Background: Current guidelines for the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction suggest a limited trial of non-operative management, often of 3-5 days. A longer delay to operation may worsen post-operative outcomes in patients who ultimately require operation. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of time to operation on post-operative outcomes in patients who undergo operation following a trial of non-operative management for adhesive small bowel obstruction.Methods: We used health administrative data to identify patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction who underwent operative management following a trial of non-operative management from 2005 to 2014 in the province of Ontario, Canada. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the relationship between the time from admission to operation with rates of 30-day mortality, serious complication, and bowel resection.Results: Three thousand five hundred sixty-three patients underwent operation after a trial of non-operative management for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Older patients, patients with a high comorbidity burden, and patients with a lower socioeconomic status were more likely to experience a longer pre-operative period. After adjusting for covariates, each additional day from admission to operation increased odds of serious complication (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.03-1.11) and bowel resection (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.03-1.98). Longer times to operation were not associated with greater adjusted odds of 30-day mortality.Conclusion: Each additional day from admission to operation is associated with greater odds of adverse outcomes. Clinical practice guidelines should emphasize strategies that identify patients who will ultimately require operation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objectives: The objectives of this study were to evaluate (1) the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) informed by the home sleep study with a Type 4 portable monitor BresoDx® versus Type 1 polysomnography (PSG); and (2) agreement of the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) compared between BresoDx and PSG.Material and Methods: This was a randomized, parallel, multicentre, single-blind, pragmatic controlled trial enrolling adults referred to three Ontario sleep clinics for suspected OSA. Participants were randomized to BresoDx followed by PSG (one-night apart) or PSG followed by BresoDx sleep testing sequence arms. The primary outcomes included the accuracy of clinical diagnosis and OSA severity measured by AHI between tests.Results: In sum, 233 participants completed both sleep studies and 206 completed physician consultation visits. The agreement between clinical diagnosis informed by PSG versus BresoDx was fair (Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.28). The sensitivity of BresoDx-informed clinical diagnosis against PSG was between 0.86 and 0.89, and the specificity between 0.38 and 0.44. For AHI cut-off of ≥5 events/hour the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 0.85, 0.48, 0.81 and 0.54.Conclusions: Home sleep apnea testing with BresoDx can be used in a referral population with a high pretest probability of OSA similar to other Type IV devices. This study complements the existing body of evidence suggesting that home testing with portable devices plays a valuable role for diagnosing of OSA in a variety of settings. SIESTA TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02003729). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]