Search

Focuses on issues related to foods in Europe and the U.S. as of June 2005. Opposition of food manufacturers in the U.S. to the proposal of the European Union to apply the rules on milseading name claims in foods set by the World Trade Organization; Information on a ruling of a case instigated by Kraft Foods Inc.; Details of visions on food production in Europe.

Genetically modified (GM) food provokes skirmishes all over the world, but the main battle is between America, which champions the stuff, and the European Union (EU), which resists it. Proponents of GM crops say they are safe, good for the environment and may provide cheaper and better food. It is perhaps little wonder that Europeans, remembering such scares as mad-cow disease, have balked at the prospect of eating or growing GM food. As for growing GM crops, experience outside Europe suggests that they are no worse for the environment than normal farming, and can be better. As GM technology develops, continued European rejection of GM could mean it loses out on future crops that might benefit its landscape, and boost its farm and science industries.

The article reports on a warning issued by food industry leaders that Europe's strict novel foods approval system is preventing businesses from bringing novel ingredients into their home markets and driving them to countries such as the U.S. instead. Topics discussed include the cost of getting novel foods approval in the European Union, the flexibility of regulations in the U.S., and a proposal to overhaul the novel foods approval process published by the European Commission in 2013.