Search

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an inherited disease that causes striated muscle weakness. Recently, we showed therapeutic effects of the combination of lisinopril (L), an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, and spironolactone (S), an aldosterone antagonist, in mice lacking dystrophin and haploinsufficient for utrophin (utrn+/−;mdx, het mice); both cardiac and skeletal muscle function and histology were improved when these mice were treated early with LS. It was unknown to what extent LS treatment is effective in the most commonly used DMD murine model, the mdx mouse. In addition, current standard-of-care treatment for DMD is limited to corticosteroids. Therefore, potentially useful alternative or additive drugs need to be both compared directly to corticosteroids and tested in presence of corticosteroids. We evaluated the effectiveness of this LS combination in the mdx mouse model both compared with corticosteroid treatment (prednisolone, P) or in combination (LSP). We tested the additional combinatorial treatment containing the angiotensin II receptor blocker losartan (T), which is widely used to halt and treat the developing cardiac dysfunction in DMD patients as an alternative to an ACE inhibitor. Peak myocardial strain rate, assessed by magnetic resonance imaging, showed a negative impact of P, whereas in both diaphragm and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle contractile function was not significantly impaired by P. Histologically, P generally increased cardiac damage, estimated by percentage area infiltrated by IgG as well as by collagen staining. In general, groups that only differed in the presence or absence of P (i.e. mdx vs. P, LS vs. LSP, and TS vs. TSP) demonstrated a significant detrimental impact of P on many assessed parameters, with the most profound impact on cardiac pathology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heart failure (HF) is associated with highly significant morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Despite the significant advances in therapies and prevention, HF remains associated with poor clinical outcomes. Understanding the contractile force and kinetic changes at the level of cardiac muscle during end-stage HF in consideration of underlying etiology would be beneficial in developing targeted therapies that can help improve cardiac performance. Investigate the impact of the primary etiology of HF (ischemic or non-ischemic) on left ventricular (LV) human myocardium force and kinetics of contraction and relaxation under near-physiological conditions. Contractile and kinetic parameters were assessed in LV intact trabeculae isolated from control non-failing (NF; n = 58) and end-stage failing ischemic (FI; n = 16) and non-ischemic (FNI; n = 38) human myocardium under baseline conditions, length-dependent activation, frequency-dependent activation, and response to the β-adrenergic stimulation. At baseline, there were no significant differences in contractile force between the three groups; however, kinetics were impaired in failing myocardium with significant slowing down of relaxation kinetics in FNI compared to NF myocardium. Length-dependent activation was preserved and virtually identical in all groups. Frequency-dependent activation was clearly seen in NF myocardium (positive force frequency relationship [FFR]), while significantly impaired in both FI and FNI myocardium (negative FFR). Likewise, β-adrenergic regulation of contraction was significantly impaired in both HF groups. End-stage failing myocardium exhibited impaired kinetics under baseline conditions as well as with the three contractile regulatory mechanisms. The pattern of these kinetic impairments in relation to NF myocardium was mainly impacted by etiology with a marked slowing down of kinetics in FNI myocardium. These findings suggest that not only force development, but also kinetics should be considered as a therapeutic target for improving cardiac performance and thus treatment of HF. [Display omitted] • Impaired baseline contraction/relaxation kinetics is dependent on etiology of HF. • Length-dependent activation of force development is not impaired in HF myocardium. • Kinetics of HF myocardium do accelerate with heart rate similar to NF myocardium. • Isoproterenol has different inotropic action between NF and HF myocardium. • Improving impaired contractile kinetics may be key in combating human end-stage HF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]