1. Argument of the Excluded Middle: The Jackson-Falwell Apartheid Debate.
- Author
-
Dudczak, Craig A.
- Abstract
Since South Africa declared the first "State of Emergency" in July 1985, the issue of South African apartheid has sparked direct and sustained debates between Jerry Falwell and Jesse Jackson at Lynchburg, Virginia, as well as on ABC's "Nightline." On "Nightline," while Falwell's position on disinvestment (after a visit to South Africa) centered on "argument from circumstance," Jackson focused on "argument from definition." However, neither Rev. Falwell nor Rev. Jackson represented the realistic policy alternatives which might have found some emergent political consensus. In fact, the position Rev. Falwell advocated created a paradox for him (for he began his remarks with the statement that morally wrong), and in addition, those whose impression of Falwell was contaminated by his association with the Moral Majority were unlikely to be converted to his position because of who he is. As for Jackson, his departure from his initially stated reliance on argument from definition (i.e., principle) to argument from circumstance (i.e., expediency) during the course of the debate signals both a substantive as well as symbolic shift. Although the selection of controversial personalities and issues clearly enhances viewership even for "Nightline," in the debate on South African apartheid, neither of the positions advocated by Falwell or Jackson represented the middle range of alternatives actively considered by the Reagan administration or by the Democratic Party. (Sixteen references and ten footnotes are attached.) (JK)
- Published
- 1988