Search

Objective: Receptors for estrogen and progesterone are present in the pelvic floor, and therefore, postmenopausal hormone therapy may affect its function. We compared the former use of estradiol-progestogen postmenopausal hormone therapy in nonhysterectomized women with a uterine prolapse surgery (N = 12,072) and control women (N = 33,704)., Methods: The women with a history of uterine prolapse operation were identified from the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register, and the control women from the Finnish Central Population Register. The use of hormone therapy was traced from the national drug reimbursement register, and the odd ratios with 95% CIs for prolapse were calculated by using the conditional logistic regression analysis., Results: The women with uterine prolapse had used hormone therapy more often than control women (N = 4,127; 34.2% vs N = 9,189; 27.3%; P < 0.005). The use of hormone therapy was accompanied by significant (23%-53%) elevations in the risk for prolapse, being higher with longer exposure. The risk elevations (33%-23%) were comparable between sole norethisteroneacetate-estradiol and sole medroxyprogesteroneacetate-estradiol therapy. The use of estradiol in combination with a levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine device was accompanied by a 52% elevation., Conclusions: The postmenopausal use of estradiol in combination with various progestogen regimens may weaken the pelvic floor, resulting in uterine prolapse. This data should be incorporated into the information given to the users of estradiol-progestogen hormone therapy.

Introduction and Hypothesis: The impact of estradiol-based hormone therapy (HT) on the incidence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is unknown. Therefore, we compared the use of such HT regimens and tibolone in women with and without SUI., Methods: The women with a history of SUI operation (N = 15,002) were identified from the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register, and the control women without such an operation (N = 44,389) from the Finnish Central Population Register. The use of HT was traced from the National Drug Reimbursement Register, and the odd ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for SUI were calculated by using the conditional logistic regression analysis., Results: The cases had used any HT more often than the controls. The use of systemic estradiol-only or estradiol-progestin therapy was accompanied by an increased SUI risk (OR 3.8, 95% CI: 3.6-4.0 and OR 2.7, 95% CI: 2.6-2.9 respectively). The use of estradiol with noretisterone acetate showed a higher risk of increase than that with medroxyprogesterone acetate. Age over 55 years at the initiation of systemic HT was accompanied by a higher SUI risk increase than that under 55 years of age. The use of tibolone, an estradiol + levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device, or vaginal estradiol also increased the risk., Conclusions: The use of HT regimens may predispose to the de novo development or worsening of pre-existing SUI. Thus, caution is needed when these regimens are prescribed to women with mild stress-related urine leakage or with established SUI risk factors.

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk of cardiac and stroke deaths in women who discontinue postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT)., Methods: We analyzed the risk of death due to cardiac (n = 5,204) and cerebrovascular (n = 3,434) causes in Finnish women who discontinued systemic HT during 1994 to 2013 (n = 432,775). The risks were compared with those in the age-matched female background population and with those in age-matched HT users. Women diagnosed with cardiac or cerebrovascular events within 1 year before discontinuation of HT were excluded (n = 8,711)., Results: Women younger than 60 years at discontinuation of HT showed a significantly increased risk of cardiac death (after ≤5 y of HT exposure, standardized mortality ratio [SMR] 1.52, 95% CI 1.13-2.00; after >5 y of exposure, SMR 2.08, 95% CI 1.44-2.90) and stroke death (after ≤5 y of exposure, SMR 2.62, 95% CI 2.07-3.28; after >5 y of exposure, SMR 3.22, 95% CI 2.29-4.40) during the first year after treatment as compared with age-matched female background population. When compared with HT users, elevations in risks of cardiac and stroke deaths were even higher. Increased mortality risks were limited to the first post-HT year because increases in risks vanished or markedly decreased when the follow-up time was extended over more than 1 year., Conclusions: Discontinuation of postmenopausal HT may be associated with increased risk of cardiac and stroke death in the first posttreatment year. Further investigation is required to evaluate causality of the observed associations.

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the effects of different hormone therapies on cardiac repolarization in recently postmenopausal women with and without hot flashes., Methods: We recruited 150 healthy women: 72 with and 78 without hot flashes. They were randomized and treated for 6 months with transdermal estradiol (1 mg/day), oral estradiol (OE) alone (2 mg/day) or combined with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA; 5 mg/day), or placebo. Cardiac repolarization was assessed by measuring QT intervals, rate-dependence of QT-end interval, and T waves from 24-hour electrocardiographic recording before and during hormone therapy, comprising a total of over 20 million QT-interval measurements., Results: Hot flashes were accompanied with shortened median T-peak - T-end interval (at RR interval of 700, 800, and 900 ms; P = 0.040, 0.020, and 0.032; η = 0.35, 0.39, and 0.37; respectively) during the use of OE but not transdermal estradiol. In contrast, the addition of MPA to OE lengthened the maximal QT-end (at RR interval of 500 ms, P = 0.016, η = 0.27) and the maximal T-peak - T-end interval (at RR interval of 500 and 600 ms; P = 0.016 and 0.032; η = 0.25 and 0.22, respectively). These effects were not seen in women without hot flashes., Conclusions: Hot flashes predict beneficial shortening in cardiac repolarization during OE, but not if MPA is combined with OE. These data may provide one explanation for MPA-related cardiac hazards in epidemiological studies.

Context: There are conflicting data on postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) and the risk of vascular dementia (VD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD)., Objective: We analyzed the mortality risk attributable to VD or AD in women with a history of HT use., Design, Patients, Interventions, and Main Outcome Measures: Finnish women (n = 489,105) using systemic HT in 1994 to 2009 were identified from the nationwide drug reimbursement register. Of these women, 581 died of VD and 1057 of AD from 1998 to 2009. Observed deaths in HT users with <5 or ≥5 years of exposure were compared with deaths that occurred in the age-standardized female population. Furthermore, we compared the VD or AD death risk of women who had started HT at <60 vs ≥60 years of age., Results: Risk of death from VD was reduced by 37% to 39% (<5 or ≥5 years of exposure) with the use of any systemic HT, and this reduction was not associated with the duration or type (estradiol only or estradiol-progestin combination) of HT. Risk of death from AD was not reduced with systemic HT use <5 years, but was slightly reduced (15%) if HT exposure exceeded 5 years. Age at systemic HT initiation (<60 vs ≥60 years) did not affect the death risk reductions., Conclusion: Estradiol-based HT use is associated with a reduced risk of death from both VD and AD, but the risk reduction is larger and appears sooner in VD than AD., (Copyright © 2017 by the Endocrine Society)

Objectives: The role of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) in the incidence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been studied extensively, but less is known of the impact of HT on the mortality risk due to an ACS., Study Design and Main Outcome Measures: We extracted from a population-based ACS register, FINAMI, 7258 postmenopausal women with the first ACS. These data were combined with HT use data from the National Drug Reimbursement Register; 625 patients (9%) had used various HT regimens. The death risks due to ACS before admission to hospital, 2-28, or 29-365days after the incident ACS were compared between HT users and non-users with logistic regression analyses., Results: In all follow-up time points, the ACS death risks in HT ever-users were smaller compared to non-users. Of women with HT ever use, 42% died within one year as compared with 52% of non-users (OR 0.62, p<0.001). Most deaths (84%) occurred within 28days after the ACS, and in this group 36% of women with ever use of HT (OR 0.73, p=0.002) and 30% of women with ≥5year HT use (OR 0.54, p<0.001) died as compared to 43% of the non-users. Age ≤60 or >60 years at the HT initiation was accompanied with similar reductions in ACS mortality risk., Conclusions: Postmenopausal HT use is accompanied with reduced mortality risk after primary ACS., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Data are controversial on the impact of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) on breast cancer mortality. We analyzed nationwide Finnish data on breast cancer mortality risk in women using HT consisting of estradiol-only therapy (ET) or estrogen-progestogen therapy (EPT)., Methods: In total, 489,105 women using HT in 1994 to 2009, traced from the nationwide reimbursement register, were followed from the HT initiation (3.3 million cumulative exposure years) to breast cancer death (n = 1,578 women). The observed deaths were compared with those in the age-standardized background population., Results: The breast cancer mortality risk was reduced in all HT users with exposure for at most 5 years (standardized mortality ratio 0.56; CI 0.52-0.60), more than 5 to 10 years (0.46; 0.41-0.51), or more than 10 years (0.62; 0.56-0.68). A significantly larger risk reduction was detected in the 50 to 59 years age group (0.33; 0.29-0.37) compared with 60 to 69 (0.64; 0.59-0.70) or 70 to 79 (0.78; 0.69-0.87) years age groups. The death risk reductions in ET users tended to be larger in all age groups compared with EPT users, with a significant difference only in the 70 to 79 years age group (0.66; 0.57-0.76 vs 0.88; 0.77-1.00). The age at HT initiation, regardless whether ET or EPT, showed no association with breast cancer mortality., Conclusions: In the Finnish unselected population, breast cancer is fatal in 1 of 10 patients. Our data imply that this risk is prevalent in 1 of 20 patients with history of HT use. This is an important message for women considering or already using HT.

Context: The "window of opportunity hypothesis" refers to data indicating that conjugated equine estrogen alone or in combination with medroxyprogesterone acetate, if initiated before 60 years of age, protects the heart but endangers it if initiated later (Women's Health Initiative study). Less is known about the "window of opportunity hypothesis" with natural estradiol alone (ET) or with various progestins in combination with estradiol (EPT)., Objective: We related the death risk from coronary heart disease (CHD) in users of ET or EPT to the age at the initiation of therapy and to the progestin component of EPT. Design, Patients, Interventions, and Main Outcome Measures: Altogether, 498 105 women had used ET or EPT containing medroxyprogesterone acetate, norethisterone acetate, dydrogesterone, other progestins, or tibolone during 3.7 million person-years during 1994-2009. Women were followed from the therapy initiation to death, or to the end of year 2009. The risk of CHD death in hormone users was compared with that in the age-matched background population using standardized mortality ratio with 95% confidence intervals., Results: Age younger than 60 rather than older than 60 years at the initiation of ET (standardized mortality ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.59 vs 0.76; 0.71-0.82), EPT with norethisterone acetate (0.45; 0.41-0.49 vs 0.74; 0.67-0.81), or tibolone (0.35; 0.26-0.47 vs 1.01; 0.67-1.46) therapy lasting for less than 5 years was associated with significantly greater decreases in the CHD death risk. A similar tendency was also seen for other EPT groups and for longer use. In all hormone users, the CHD death risk was smaller the earlier the use of ET or EPT had started (P < .05); this phenomenon was unrelated to the progestin component of EPT., Conclusions: Estradiol-based hormone therapies are accompanied with larger CHD mortality risk reductions the earlier the therapies are initiated. The progestin component of EPT does not modify this "timing effect."

Context: Current guidelines recommend annual discontinuation of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) to evaluate whether a woman could manage without the treatment. The impact of HT on cardiovascular health has been widely studied, but it is not known how the withdrawal of HT affects cardiovascular risk., Objective: We evaluated the risk of cardiac or stroke death after the discontinuation of HT. Design, Patients, Interventions, and Main Outcome Measures: Altogether 332 202 Finnish women discontinuing HT between 1994 and 2009 (data from National Reimbursement register) were followed up from the discontinuation date to death due to cardiac cause (n = 3177) or stroke (n = 1952), or to the end of 2009. The deaths, retrieved from the national Cause of Death Register, were compared with the expected number of deaths in the age-standardized background population. In a subanalysis we also compared HT stoppers with HT users., Results: Within the first posttreatment year, the risk of cardiac death was significantly elevated (standardized mortality ratio; 95% confidence interval 1.26; 1.16-1.37), whereas follow-up for longer than 1 year was accompanied with a reduction (0.75; 0.72-0.78). The risk of stroke death in the first posttreatment year was increased (1.63; 1.47-1.79), but follow-up for longer than 1 year was accompanied with a reduced risk (0.89; 0.85-0.94). The cardiac (2.30; 2.12-2.50) and stroke (2.52; 2.28-2.77) death risk elevations were even higher when compared with HT users. In women who discontinued HT at age younger than 60 years, but not in women aged 60 years or older, the cardiac mortality risk was elevated (1.94; 1.51-2.48)., Conclusions: Increased cardiovascular death risks question the safety of annual HT discontinuation practice to evaluate whether a woman could manage without HT.

Data on the possible impact of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) on the incidence of rare primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) are scarce. Therefore, we conducted a nationwide case-control study analyzing the association between the use of different HTs and PFTC. All women aged 50 years or older with an incident PFTC (n = 360) during 1995-2007 were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry. For each case of PFTC, ten age- and place of residence-matched controls were selected from the Finnish National Population Register, which also provided information on parity. Data on HT purchases were received from the Prescription Register, and data on hysterectomies and sterilizations from the National Care Register. Controls with a salpingectomy before the PFTC diagnosis of the respective case were excluded. The PFTC risk in relation to different HTs was estimated with a conditional logistic regression model, adjusted for parity, age at last delivery, hysterectomy and sterilization. The use for five years or more of estradiol combined with levonorgestrel-releasing-intrauterine system (odds ratio 2.84, 95% confidence interval 1.10-7.38) and sequential estradiol-progestin therapy (EPT; 3.37; 2.23-5.08) were both linked with increases in the risk of PFTC, while the risk with use of estradiol-only therapy or continuous EPT was not statistically significantly increased. The OR for the use of tibolone for one year or more was 1.56 (0.55-4.41). The use of HT is related to an increased risk of PFTC, particularly when a progestin component is intrauterine or systemic progestin is given in sequential manner., (© 2015 UICC.)

Objective: Data on the health benefits and risks of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) are derived mainly from the use of conjugated equine estrogens. Estradiol-based regimens may have a different risk-benefit profile. We evaluated the risk of death caused by coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, or any disease among users of estradiol-based HT regimens in a nationwide study in Finland., Methods: A total of 489,105 women who used HT from 1994 to 2009 (3.3 million HT exposure years), as indicated in the nationwide reimbursement register and the national Cause of Death Register, were followed. A total of 28,734 HT users died during follow-up; among the deaths, 3,843 were caused by CHD and 2,464 were caused by stroke. Mortality risk in HT users with varying duration of exposure (≤1 y, >1 to 3 y, >3 to 5 y, >5 to 10 y, or >10 y) was compared with that in an age-matched background population., Results: Risk of CHD death was significantly reduced by 18% to 54% in HT users and was positively related to HT exposure time. Risk of stroke death was also reduced by 18% to 39%, but this reduction was not clearly related to HT exposure time. Risk of all-cause mortality was reduced in HT users by 12% to 38%, almost in linear relationship with duration of exposure. All these risk reductions were comparable in women initiating HT before age 60 years and women initiating HT at age 60 years or older., Conclusions: In absolute terms, the risk reductions mean 19 fewer CHD deaths and 7 fewer stroke deaths per 1,000 women using any HT for at least 10 years.

Objective: The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study clarified the indications and contraindications for postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT). We studied the impact of the WHI results on the risk of fatal stroke in HT users in Finland., Study Design: Retrospective analysis setting: Nationwide registers on postmenopausal HT use and causes of death between 1995 and 2009., Population: Women ≥40 years (n=290,272) using systemic estradiol-based postmenopausal HT., Methods: Follow-up started from the first HT purchase during the pre-WHI era (1995-2001) and post-WHI era (2002-2009)., Main Outcome Measures: Stroke deaths in HT users were compared with that in the age-matched background population and expressed as standardized mortality ratio (SMR) with 95% confidence intervals., Results: Overall, 311 HT users died due to stroke. The exposure to HT ≤1 year was associated with a similarly reduced 22% (0.67-0.91) risk of stroke death in the pre-WHI era and in the post-WHI era 27% (0.55-0.94). The risk reductions for HT exposure of 1-8 years in the pre-WHI era (47%, 0.42-0.65) did not differ from that in the post-WHI era (32%, 0.48-0.94). The discontinuation of HT was accompanied by a significant 33% (1.02-1.72) increase in stroke death risk in the pre-WHI era and a non-significant 32% (0.84-1.99) increase in the post-WHI era within the first post-treatment year, but no longer after 1-8 years., Conclusions: The change in prescribing policy after the WHI study did not affect the risk of fatal stroke in Finnish HT users., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess whether coronary heart disease mortality in Finnish hormone therapy (HT) users differed before and after 2002 when the Women's Health Initiative study was published., Methods: The risks of coronary heart disease death in HT users in relation to the age-matched background population were compared between the pre- (1995-2001) and post- (2002-2009) Women's Health Initiative eras. We used a nationwide register on HT (ie, estradiol with or without progestin) reimbursement and linked them to causes of death in 290,272 women aged 40 years or older., Results: Exposure to HT for 1 year or less was accompanied by a 29% reduction (0.71; 0.63-0.80; three per 10,000 fewer deaths) and an exposure of 1-8 years with a 43% reduction (0.57; 0.48-0.66; three per 10,000 fewer deaths) in the risk of coronary heart disease death in the pre-Women's Health Initiative era. In the post-Women's Health Initiative era, HT use of 1 year or less was associated with an 18% reduction (0.82; 0.76-1.00; one per 10,000 fewer deaths) and an exposure of 1-8 years with a 54% reduction (0.46; 0.32-0.64; two per 10,000 fewer deaths) in coronary heart disease mortality. Discontinuation of HT was associated with an increased risk of cardiac death of 42% (1.42; 1.17-1.71; seven per 10,000 extra deaths) in the pre-Women's Health Initiative era and 31% (1.31; 0.92-1.82; two per 10,000 extra deaths) in the post-Women's Health Initiative era during the first posttreatment year. This risk increase vanished in further follow-up during both eras., Conclusion: Changes in HT use after the Women's Health Initiative failed to affect coronary heart disease mortality of HT users in this nationwide study.

Objective: We assessed the impact of hot flashes and various forms of hormone therapy on health-related quality of life and sexual well-being in recently postmenopausal women., Methods: We prospectively interviewed 150 healthy women about hot flashes and health-related quality of life (using the Women's Health Questionnaire and the McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire), menopause-related symptoms, and general health. The women were classified into those with (n = 72) and without (n = 78) hot flashes and treated for 6 months with transdermal estradiol (1 mg/d), oral estradiol (2 mg/d) with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate (5 mg/d), or placebo., Results: At baseline, hot flashes contributed most strongly to poor sleep (correlation coefficient r = -0.525, P < 0.0001), somatic symptoms such as muscle pains (r = -0.348, P < 0.0001), menstrual cycle-resembling complaints (r = -0.304, P < 0.0001), anxiety and fears (r = -0.283, P < 0.0001), decreased memory and concentration (r = -0.279, P = 0.001), and sexual behavior (r = -0.174, P = 0.035). The different hormone therapy regimens alleviated hot flashes equally effectively and were therefore combined into a single group for further analysis. In women with baseline flashes, hormone therapy use significantly improved the scores for sleep (0.787 [0.243] vs 0.557 [0.249], hormone therapy vs placebo, P = 0.001, at 6 mo), memory and concentration capacity (0.849 [0.228] vs 0.454 [0.301], P < 0.0001, at 6 mo), and anxiety and fears (0.942 [0.133] vs 0.826 [0.193], P = 0.005, at 6 mo). Hormone therapy use showed no significant impact on these variables in women without baseline flashes., Conclusions: Hot flashes contribute differently to various variables affecting health-related quality of life shortly after menopause. Estradiol or an estradiol-medroxyprogesterone acetate combination similarly alleviates hot flashes and improves health-related quality of life in relation to elimination of hot flashes. Hormone therapy use does not confer any detectable quality-of-life benefit over placebo in women without disturbing baseline flashes.

Postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) associates with an increased risk of ovarian cancer, but its' influence on tumor histology is not as well known. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of various types of HT on the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer by histological subtype. All Finnish women diagnosed with ovarian cancer (n = 3,958) aged over 50 during 1995-2007 were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry. For each case, three controls, matched for age and place of residence, were recruited from the Finnish National Population Register, which also provided data on parity and ages at deliveries. After exclusion of controls with oophorectomy, 11,325 controls remained. The prescription register provided HT use from age 50. Odds ratios (OR) for different HTs were estimated by conditional logistic regression: adjusted for parity, ages at deliveries and hysterectomy. Estradiol-only therapy use for 5 years or more associated with an increased risk (OR 1.45; 95% confidence interval 1.20-1.75) of a serous subtype, but with a decreased risk of mucinous subtype (0.35; 0.19-0.67). Use of sequential estradiol-progestin therapy (EPT) for 5 years or more associated with an increase in overall ovarian cancer risk (1.35; 1.20-1.63) and with an increase in the endometrioid subtype (1.88; 1.24-2.86) particularly. Continuous EPT, estradiol + levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or tibolone had no effect on overall ovarian cancer risk. In conclusion, only sequential EPT use for 5 years or more associates with an increased risk of overall ovarian cancer. Furthermore, HT regimens differ significantly in their association with various histological types of ovarian cancer., (© 2013 UICC.)

Objective: Primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) is a rare malignancy and only sparse data exist on its possible association with postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT). We therefore studied this association in a nationwide cohort of Finnish HT users., Methods: All women> 50 years using systemic estradiol-only therapy (ET) (n=117,820 hysterectomized women) or estradiol-progestin therapy (EPT) (n=247,781 nonhysterectomized women) for ≥ 6 months during 1994-2008 were identified from the national medical reimbursement register. The incidence of PFTC in HT users was compared to that in the comparable background population (standardized incidence ratio, SIR, with 95% confidence interval, CI)., Results: A total of 160 cases of PFTC were encountered in users of ET (n=34) or EPT (n=126). The use of EPT ≥ 5 years was accompanied by an increased risk for PFTC (SIR 2.15; 95% CI 1.66-2.72). The SIR increased further to 3.36 (95% CI 2.02-5.24) when EPT use lasted ≥ 10 years. The EPT-related risk for PFTC was restricted to the sequential EPT and it was not seen for continuous EPT. Two leading progestins in EPT, norethisterone acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate, associated with comparable risk elevations. ET use was not associated with the risk for PFTC., Conclusions: The long-term, sequential use of EPT associates with an increased risk for PFTC. In absolute terms, 4 additional cases of PFTC would be detected in 10-year follow-up of 10,000 women who have used EPT for at least 5 years., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To compare the responses of heart rate and blood pressure to various autonomic tests in women with and without pre-treatment hot flushes during estradiol and estradiol+medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) use., Study Design and Main Outcome Measures: Hundred and fifty recently postmenopausal women (72 with and 78 without hot flushes) were randomized to receive transdermal estradiol (1mg/day), oral estradiol (2 mg/day) alone or in combination with MPA (5mg/day), or placebo for six months. Cardiovascular responsiveness was comprehensively assessed with controlled and deep breathing, active orthostatic test, Valsalva maneuver and handgrip test., Results: Hot flushes were accompanied with a significant reduction (-2.2±0.7 vs. 1.3±1.1 beats/min, p=0.03) in resting heart rate during estradiol-only treatment; the route of estradiol administration was no factor in this regard. This effect was attenuated by the addition of MPA to oral estradiol. Hot flushes were also associated with reduced maximal heart rate in response to handgrip during the use of estradiol-only therapy (-2.2±1.3 vs. 2.8±1.5 beats/min, p=0.038); again, the MPA addition eliminated this effect. Hot flushes were accompanied with lowered resting but augmented blood pressure responses to handgrip test during all hormone regimens, whereas in women without hot flushes estradiol-only regimen tended to elevate diastolic resting blood pressure., Conclusions: Hot flushes appear as determinants for cardiovascular responses to hormone therapy. Estradiol-only therapy causes beneficial changes in cardiovascular regulation in flushing women, and these are blunted, in part, by the addition of MPA., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The authors conducted a nationwide cohort study to evaluate the association between postmenopausal hormone therapy and meningioma incidence in Finland. All women who had used hormone therapy at least for 6 months at the age of 50 years or older during 1994-2009 were included. Women who had used postmenopausal hormone therapy were identified from the medical reimbursement register of the Social Insurance Institution (131,480 estradiol users and 131,248 estradiol-progestin users), and meningioma cases were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry. During the average 9 years of follow-up, 289 estradiol users and 196 estradiol-progestin users were diagnosed with meningioma. Ever use of estradiol-only therapy was associated with an increased risk of meningioma (standardized incidence ratio = 1.29, 95% confidence interval: 1.15, 1.44). Among women who had been using estradiol-only therapy for at least 3 years, the incidence of meningioma was 1.40-fold higher (95% confidence interval: 1.18, 1.64; P < 0.001) than in the background population. In contrast, this risk was not increased in users of combination therapy (standardized incidence ratio = 0.93, 95% confidence interval: 0.80, 1.06). There was no difference in risk between continuous and sequential use of hormone therapy. Estradiol-only therapy was accompanied with a slightly increased risk of meningioma.

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the responses of heart rate variability (HRV) with hormone therapy in recently postmenopausal women with and without vasomotor hot flashes., Methods: Seventy-two women with and 78 women without hot flashes were randomized to receive transdermal estradiol gel (1 g/day), oral estradiol alone (2 mg/day), oral estradiol combined with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA; 5 mg/day), or placebo for 6 months. Time- and frequency-domain measures of HRV were assessed using 24-hour electrocardiographic recordings at baseline and after hormone therapy., Results: At baseline, the cardiac variables were similar in women with and without hot flashes. In women with hot flashes, the mean 24-hour heart rate and nighttime heart rate showed a tendency toward reduction in estradiol-only users compared with those taking placebo and those taking estradiol combined with MPA. In women with hot flashes, oral estradiol versus transdermal estradiol reduced nighttime HRV in the time domain (triangular index, -27 ± 36 vs +8 ± 36, P = 0.042). In women without hot flashes, the use of oral estradiol with MPA reduced time-domain HRV (SD of all normal-to-normal intervals; -11 ± 13 ms, P = 0.048, and square root of the mean of the sum of the squares of differences between adjacent normal-to-normal intervals; -6 ± 8 ms, P = 0.036). The women with hot flashes had more supraventricular ectopic beats when using oral estradiol with MPA than when using oral estradiol only (71 ± 128 vs 12 ± 11, P = 0.018)., Conclusions: Oral estrogen, especially when combined with MPA, may have adverse effects on HRV in women with and without hot flashes, whereas transdermal estradiol showed no such effects. Furthermore, women with hot flashes receiving oral estrogen combined with MPA are possibly more prone to cardiac arrhythmias than are women using estrogen only.

Objective: Insufficient data exist on the effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy as the risk factor for uterine sarcomas. We therefore evaluated the association of estradiol-progestin therapy (EPT) with the risk of uterine sarcoma in nation-wide cohort study., Methods: All Finnish women (>50 years of age) who had used EPT during the years 1994-2008 for at least 6 months (n=243,857) were identified from the national Medical Reimbursement Registry. Their incidence of uterine stromal and leiomyosarcoma among the EPT users was compared to that in the background population with the aid of the Finnish Cancer Registry., Results: A total of 76 uterine sarcomas were encountered in the EPT cohort; 45 (59%) were leiomyosarcomas, 24 (32%) stromal sarcomas and 7 (9%) other sarcomas. The exposure to EPT for less than 5 years did not associate with significant rises in the sarcoma risk but longer exposure was accompanied with significant risk elevations for all uterine sarcomas: the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for 5-10 years of use was 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-2.9 and for ≥10 years of use 3.0 (1.3-5.9): the SIRs were highest for leiomyosarcoma. The sequential and continuous uses of progestin were associated with similar increased SIRs for uterine sarcoma., Conclusions: The use of EPT for 5 years or more is associated with an increased risk for uterine sarcomas. This turns to an absolute excess risk of 2-3 extra uterine sarcoma cases per 10,000 long-time EPT users followed for 10 years., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Breast cancer is a heterogenous disease and hormonal factors are involved. Since national differences exist in the use of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) and other risk factors, associations between HT and breast cancer should be studied nationally. In Finland, estrogen-progestin therapy is associated with higher breast cancer risk than estrogen-only therapy. Also tibolone and levonorgestrel releasing intauterine device combined with estrogen are accompanied with an increased risk of breast cancer. Hormone therapy possibly promotes the growth of the existing undetectable cancer.

We examined the associations between various doses and routes of administration of norethisterone acetate (NETA) in estrogen-progestagen therapy (EPT) and the risk of breast cancer in Finland. All Finnish women with first invasive breast cancer diagnosed between the ages of 50-62 during 1995-2007 (n = 9,956) were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry. For each case, 3 controls of the same age were retrieved from the Finnish Population Register. The use of estradiol+NETA-therapy by the cases and controls was traced from the national Medical Reimbursement Registry. The data were analyzed with multivariate conditional logistic regression, adjusting for parity, age at the first birth, and health care district. The continuous mode of NETA use tended to be associated with a higher rate ratio for breast cancer than the sequential use. The use of continuous "low" dose (NETA 0.5 mg + estradiol 1.0 mg) was associated with an increased rate ratio of breast cancer already in less than 3 years of use (odds ratio 1.94; 95% confidence interval 1.39-2.70) while a risk elevation for "high" dose (NETA 1.0 mg + estradiol 2.0 mg) was seen after 3 years use (1.71; 1.51-2.54). Oral and transdermal use of NETA were accompanied with comparable risks for breast cancer. In conclusion, the dose or route of administration of NETA in EPT do not modify the risks for breast cancer.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) and the risk for breast cancer in recently postmenopausal Finnish women. All Finnish women with first invasive breast cancer diagnosed between the ages of 50 and 62 years during 1995-2007 (n = 9,956) were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry. For each case, 3 controls of the same age were retrieved from the Finnish Population Register. The cases and controls were linked to the national medical reimbursement register to assess the use of HT. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for breast cancer were calculated with conditional logistic regression analysis, adjusting for parity, age at the first birth and health care district. Estradiol-only therapy (991 users with breast cancer, n) or oral progestagen (n = 138) was not accompanied by an increased risk. Estradiol-progestagen therapy (EPT) (n = 1,731) was associated with an elevated risk in the whole series (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.27-1.46). The risk became detectable in less than 3 years of use. Continuous EPT use tended to be associated with a higher risk for breast cancer than the sequential EPT use. The use of tibolone (n = 80) (1.36; 1.15-1.96), a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) alone (n = 154) (1.45; 1.97-1.77) or as a complement to estradiol (n = 137) (2.15; 1.72-2.68) was also associated with an increased risk. The association between HT use and the risk for breast cancer shows a large variation between various forms of HT, and also the use of LNG-IUS may carry a risk.

Objective: To compare the vascular responses to hormone therapy in women with and without hot flushes., Methods: We randomly assigned 143 healthy, recently postmenopausal women (mean age 52.4+/-0.2 years, time since menopause 19.5+/-0.9 months) with intolerable hot flushes (more than seven moderate/severe episodes per day) or tolerable hot flushes (fewer than three mild episodes per day) to receive 1 mg of transdermal estradiol gel, oral estradiol (2 mg) with and without daily medroxyprogesterone acetate, or placebo for 6 months. Vascular function was assessed by pulse-wave analysis and endothelial function testing with nitroglycerin and salbutamol challenges., Results: Hot flushes did not affect the changes in arterial or aortic stiffness or endothelial function in response to various forms of hormone therapy. However, in women with tolerable hot flushes, oral estradiol caused a decrease of 13.2% (P=.028) in the time to the first systolic peak (dependent on the rapid phase of ventricular ejection) after nitroglycerin. In addition, the time to the reflected wave (dependent on pulse-wave velocity) after nitroglycerin was decreased by 8.4% (P=.018). These effects were not seen in women with intolerable hot flushes or with the other treatment regimens., Conclusion: Women without troublesome hot flushes are susceptible to unfavorable vascular effects after oral estrogen treatment, resulting in less compliant vasculature., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00668603., Level of Evidence: I.

Objective: To estimate the risk for breast cancer in Finnish women using postmenopausal estradiol (E2)-progestogen therapy., Methods: All Finnish women over 50 years using E2-progestogen therapy for at least 6 months in 1994-2005 (N=221,551) were identified from the national medical reimbursement register and followed up for breast cancer incidence (n=6,211 cases) through the Finnish Cancer Registry to the end of 2005. The risk for breast cancer in E2-progestogen therapy users was compared with that in the general population., Results: The standardized incidence ratio for all types of breast cancer was not elevated within the first 3 years of use, but it rose to 1.31 (95% confidence interval 1.20-1.42) for the use from 3-5 years and to 2.07 (1.84-2.30) with 10 or more years of use. Exposure to sequential progestogen for 5 years or more was accompanied with a lower risk elevation (1.78, 1.64-1.90) than exposure to continuous use (2.44, 2.17-2.72). Oral and transdermal use of E2-progestogen therapy was associated with comparable risk elevations for breast cancer. The use of norethisterone acetate was accompanied with a higher risk after 5 years of use (2.03, 1.88-2.18) than that of medroxyprogesterone acetate (1.64, 1.49-1.79). The risk of lobular breast cancer increased sooner than that for ductal cancer and was detectable for E2-progestogen therapy use less than 3 years (1.35, 1.18-1.53). There was no excess risk of breast cancer with distant metastases among E2-progestogen therapy users., Conclusion: The use of E2-progestogen therapy is associated with an increased risk for breast cancer after 3 years of use. The risk is lower for sequential than for continuous use, but comparable for oral and transdermal use. The risk elevation may not be uniform for all progestogens., Level of Evidence: II.

Objective: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy predisposes women to liver disorders years after affected pregnancy. We compared the basal levels and responses of hyaluronic acid, a marker of liver fibrosis, and liver transaminases to postmenopausal hormone therapy in women with (n = 20) and without (n = 20) a history of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy., Study Design: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial., Results: Basal levels of hyaluronic acid were similar in both groups. Two weeks of oral estradiol 2.0 mg/day led to significant but similar (10.9% to 15.4%) rises in hyaluronic acid in both groups. Increasing the dose of oral estradiol to 4.0 mg/day resulted in normalization of the levels, whereas the addition of medroxyprogesterone acetate led to falls (11.0% to 10.7 %) in hyaluronic acid. Transdermal estradiol 50 microg led to a rise (3.2 %) in hyaluronic acid only in the control group. Other liver markers were normal at baseline and during hormone therapy., Conclusion: Normal basal levels and/or normal responses of hyaluronic acid and other liver markers to hormone therapy in women with previous intrahepatic cholestasis suggest that this therapy does not predispose these women to liver diseases.

Objectives: Current recommendations for hormone therapy (HT) are mainly based on findings from studies using standard dose regimens in older women who had a different health profile from those who start HT soon after the onset of menopause., Methods: We, therefore, reviewed controlled trials assessing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of low-dose oral continuous combined HT (cc-HT) started for treatment of climacteric symptoms. This review is limited to oral cc-HT regimens over sequential regimens as most postmenopausal women prefer not to have a return of uterine bleeding, and to studies of at least 2 years in duration., Results: Low-dose cc-HT is effective in alleviating climacteric symptoms and in maintaining bone density over prolonged periods, although no data were available regarding fracture risk. No increased risk of coronary heart disease, venous thrombo-embolism or stroke during the use of low-dose cc-HT was reported in the long-term studies and no definitive evidence for an increased risk of breast cancer was found. Breakthrough bleeding during the first months of use is less common than with standard dose HT and amenorrhoea is achieved in most women over time. These regimens are safe for the endometrium and are well tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse events compared with standard doses., Conclusions: Current evidence from controlled trials indicates that low-dose oral cc-HT appears effective and safe. This makes it a good choice for the alleviation of climacteric symptoms, and for this purpose long-term administration of low-dose cc-HT does not seem to impose serious health risks. However, more long-term study data and direct head-to-head comparisons between various low-dose preparations are needed to support or rectify the safety aspects.

Objective: To evaluate whether the risk of estrogen-only therapy on breast cancer varies by dose, constituent, and route of administration., Methods: All Finnish women older than age 50 years using oral or transdermal estradiol (n=84,729), oral estriol (n=7,941), or vaginal estrogens (n=18,314) for at least 6 months during 1994-2001 were identified from the national medical reimbursement register. They were followed for breast cancer with the aid of the Finnish Cancer Registry to the end of 2002., Results: Altogether, 2,171 women with breast cancer were identified. The standardized incidence ratio of breast cancer with systemic estradiol for less than 5 years was 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.80-1.04), and for estradiol use for 5 years or more, 1.44 (1.29-1.59). Oral and transdermal estradiol was accompanied by a similar risk of breast cancer. The risk was most prominent with the dose greater than 1.9 mg/d orally; whereas the risk associated with transdermal route was not dose-dependent. The standardized incidence ratio for the lobular type of breast cancer (1.58) was slightly higher than that for the ductal type (1.36). The use of estradiol was associated with both localized breast cancer (1.45; 1.26-1.66) and cancer spread to regional nodes (1.35; 1.09-1.65). The incidence of carcinoma in situ (n=32) was increased (2.43; 1.66-3.42) among estradiol users., Conclusion: Estradiol for 5 years or more, either orally or transdermally, means 2-3 extra cases of breast cancer per 1,000 women who are followed for 10 years. Oral estradiol use for less than 5 years, oral estriol, or vaginal estrogens were not associated with a risk of breast cancer., Level of Evidence: II-2.

Objective: To review the evidence of the efficacy of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in secondary prevention of coronary artery disease or stroke., Results: Although a number of rather large and prolonged non-randomized observational studies have produced convincing and consistent evidence of the efficacy of HRT in the prevention of recurrence of cardiac events, the first randomized, placebo controlled trial (RCT) on heart disease and estrogen replacement study (HERS) reported no benefit of conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in secondary prevention of cardiac events in women with established coronary artery disease. This was supported by RCT reporting no effect of CEE or CEE + MPA on the progress of coronary sclerosis. Similarly, some nonrandomized observational studies have evaluated the risk of recurrent stroke in regard to the use of HRT, and the data are conflicting reporting a reduced or increased risk of recurrence for HRT users. One RCT has shown that low-dose estrogen treatment can only slow down the progression of carotid arteriosclerosis in high-risk postmenopausal women, whereas two other RCTs have shown no benefit (or risk) of using HRT for secondary prevention of ischemic stroke or progression of carotid atherosclerosis., Conclusion: The evidence accumulated so far shows that HRT has no place in secondary prevention of coronary or carotic artery disease. Its use in these patients must be based on solid nonvascular indications and expected benefits from these causes.

The aim of the study was to compare alendronate, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and their combination in treatment of osteoporosis in elderly postmenopausal women. Ninety patients, aged 65-80 yr (mean 71), with a T-score of bone mineral density (BMD) of 2.5 or less at either the lumbar spine or the femoral neck were randomized to receive daily 10 mg alendronate (n = 30), 2 mg estradiol plus 1 mg norethisterone acetate (n = 30) (HRT), or their combination (n = 30) for 2 yr. BMD of the lumbar spine and the upper femur was measured at baseline and after 1 and 2 yr of treatment. Urinary excretion of type I collagen aminoterminal telopeptide as related to creatinine and serum type I procollagen aminoterminal propeptide was assayed at baseline and at 6-month intervals thereafter. Increases of 9.1-11.2% in lumbar spine BMD at 2 yr were similar in the study groups. Only HRT increased femoral neck BMD statistically significantly (P < 0.0001 for a change from baseline) at both 1 (+4.9%; P =NS vs. the other groups) and 2 yr (+5.8%; P < 0.05 vs. the other groups). Total hip BMD increased similarly in all study groups. Percentage reductions in urinary type I collagen aminoterminal telopeptide in the HRT group (60.2-62.7%) were significantly smaller than those in the combination group (78.1-80.4%) (P < 0.0001-0.0069) and the alendronate-only group (72.4-76.1%) (P = 0.047 at 24 months). Serum type I procollagen aminoterminal propeptide decreased less in the HRT group (53.6-59.8%) than in the other groups [73.0-75.0% in the alendronate group (P < 0.001 at 12 months); 67.0-71.5% in the combination group (P < 0.0001 at 12 months, P = 0.013 at 24 months)]. We conclude that in elderly postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, the combination of HRT and alendronate did not offer an extra gain of bone mass over either treatment alone. In terms of BMD changes, the single treatments were equally effective, but the reductions in bone markers were less with HRT than with alendronate.

Background: Fatty acid esters of 17beta-estradiol (E2) are estrogen metabolites associated with lipoproteins in blood., Aim: To study the effects of estrogen therapy on concentrations of serum E2 fatty acid esters in postmenopausal women with a history of an estrogen-related liver disorder, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP), and in healthy women in a double-blind, crossover fashion., Method: ICP (n = 10) and control women (n = 10) received increasing doses of E2 valerate orally 2-4 mg/day, or transdermal E2 50-100 microg/day for 6 weeks. After a 4-week wash-out period, the subjects crossed over to the alternate E2 treatment. Concentrations of serum E2 fatty acid esters were quantified after saponification by fluoroimmunoassay., Results: Oral E2 administration increased median serum E2 fatty acid ester concentrations from 57 to 73 pmol/L in the ICP and from 56 to 74 pmol/L in the control group, in association with elevations in serum E2, estrone and sex hormone-binding globulin levels. Transdermal E2 treatment did not increase serum E2 ester levels., Conclusions: The increase in serum E2 fatty acid esters during oral E2 administration may be attributed, at least partly, to the higher estrogen dose during oral compared with transdermal therapy. A history of ICP did not affect esterification of E2 during estrogen therapy.

Objective: C-reactive protein and soluble E-selectin hold promise as surrogate markers for future cardiovascular events. We studied the effects of oral hormone therapy (HT) and alendronate, given alone or together, on these markers and on sex hormone-binding globulin levels in osteoporotic elderly women., Design: Prospective, randomized, double-dummy trial., Setting: Outpatient department of a university hospital., Participant(s): Ninety osteoporotic women (T score < or =2.5 at the lumbar spine or femoral neck) 65 to 80 years of age., Intervention(s): Randomized assignment to 1 year of treatment with estradiol, 2 mg p.o., plus norethisterone acetate, 1 mg (hormone therapy); alendronate, 10 mg; or HT plus alendronate., Main Outcome Measure(s): Serum levels of C-reactive protein, E-selectin, and sex hormone-binding globulin were measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months., Result(s): Hormone therapy significantly increased C-reactive protein levels by 76.5% at 6 months and by 47.1% at 12 months, but reduced E-selectin levels by 24.3% at 6 months and by 30.0% at 12 months. Alendronate had no effect on C-reactive protein or E-selectin and failed to modify the responses of C-reactive protein or E-selectin to hormone therapy. Hormone therapy increased sex hormone-binding globulin levels, whereas alendronate had no effect on this substance., Conclusion(s): The increase in C-reactive protein level in response to oral HT in elderly osteoporotic women may result from stimulated synthesis of C-reactive protein in the liver, whereas the decrease in E-selectin level may reflect a direct effect of HT on endothelial cells. Alendronate has no effect on vascular markers or sex hormone-binding globulin.

Objective: To compare the response of serum lipids and lipoproteins to the transdermal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in five European countries., Methods: Five-hundred and sixty-seven healthy postmenopausal women from Belgium, Finland, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK received transdermal estradiol 50 microg daily for 12 months. In addition, two groups received transdermally norethisterone acetate (NETA) continuously, two groups sequentially (170 or 350 microg/day); one group received sequentially oral NETA (1 mg/day), and one group dydrogestrone (20 mg/day). Serum total cholesterol, HDL-, HDL2-, LDL-cholesterol, lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), and triglycerides were assessed before and at the end of treatment., Results: No significant national differences existed in the pretreatment levels of lipids and lipoproteins. Mean cholesterol, LDL, Lp(a), and triglycerides decreased during HRT, and HDL and HDL2 increased. Individual changes in responses to HRT were strongly dependent on pretreatment values. In this regard, British women differed from the others: their cholesterol, HDL, HDL2, and Lp(a) responses, when related to the pretreatment levels, were smaller than those of the others., Conclusion: A national difference discovered in response of serum lipids to HRT calls for caution in generalization of lipid data from one nation to another during HRT., (Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.)

Study Question: Does the use of post-menopausal vaginal estradiol (VE) affect the mortality risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke.Summary Answer: The use of VE reduces the risk for cardiovascular mortality.What Is Known Already: A growing number of women use VE for post-menopausal genitourinary symptoms. Although this therapy is intended to have only local effects, estrogen is absorbed into the blood circulation and thus VE use may also have systemic effects.Study Design, Size, Duration: We studied a nationwide cohort in Finland 1994-2009 during which post-menopausal women (n = 195 756) initiated the use of VE (age [mean ± SD] 65.7 ± 10.9 years). Follow-up data gathered 1.4 million women-years and we assessed the mortality risk due to CHD (n= 9656) or stroke (n = 4294).Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: The mortality risk in VE users was compared with that in the age-matched background population (standardized mortality ratio; [SMR]; 95% confidence interval) and related to various durations of exposure to VE (1 to ≤3, >3 to ≤5, >5 to ≤10 and >10 years).Main Results and the Role Of Chance: The use of VE was accompanied by decreases in the risk for CHD and stroke death. The risk reduction for CHD death was highest for >3 to ≤5 years exposure (SMR 0.64; 0.57-0.70) and for stroke for >5 to ≤10 years exposure (SMR 0.64; 0.57-0.72). The risk reductions for both CHD and stroke mortality were detected in all age groups with the highest risk reduction being in women aged 50-59 years (SMR 0.43; 0.19-0.88 and SMR 0.21; 0.06-0.58, respectively).Limitations, Reasons For Caution: Our series lack a placebo arm and thus, may harbor a healthy woman bias. Moreover, data on clinical variables such as weight, smoking, blood pressure and family background were unobtainable for this study. Women using both VE and systemic hormone therapy (HT) were included in the comparator background population. This should not cause any significant error because the proportion of women using VE or other HT was modest (<10% in age-matched population) and because the use of systemic HT also reduces death risks in the same population. Our data cannot be directly applied for local regimens containing conjugated equine estrogens, because they are absorbed differently and may show effects that differ from those of estradiol.Wider Implications Of the Findings: In 1000 women using VE for up to 10 years, a maximum of 24 fewer CHD deaths and 18 fewer stroke deaths is likely to occur.Study Funding/competing Interests: This work was supported by unrestricted grants from the Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation, the Emil Aaltonen Foundation, the Finnish Medical Foundation, Finska Läkaresällskapet, the Orion Farmos Research Foundation, the Paavo Nurmi Foundation and a special governmental grant for health sciences research. The funding sources had no role in the study design, data handling or manuscript preparation. EPID Research is a company that performs financially supported studies for several pharmaceutical companies. Dr Korhonen, Dr Hoti and MSc Vattulainen, employed by Epid Research, report financial activities from several other pharmaceutical companies outside the submitted work. Dr Mikkola has been a speaker and/or received consulting fees from Mylan and Novo Nordisk. Dr Tuomikoski has been a speaker and/or received consulting fees from Orion and Mylan. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]