Search

Context: There are conflicting data on postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) and the risk of vascular dementia (VD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD)., Objective: We analyzed the mortality risk attributable to VD or AD in women with a history of HT use., Design, Patients, Interventions, and Main Outcome Measures: Finnish women (n = 489,105) using systemic HT in 1994 to 2009 were identified from the nationwide drug reimbursement register. Of these women, 581 died of VD and 1057 of AD from 1998 to 2009. Observed deaths in HT users with <5 or ≥5 years of exposure were compared with deaths that occurred in the age-standardized female population. Furthermore, we compared the VD or AD death risk of women who had started HT at <60 vs ≥60 years of age., Results: Risk of death from VD was reduced by 37% to 39% (<5 or ≥5 years of exposure) with the use of any systemic HT, and this reduction was not associated with the duration or type (estradiol only or estradiol-progestin combination) of HT. Risk of death from AD was not reduced with systemic HT use <5 years, but was slightly reduced (15%) if HT exposure exceeded 5 years. Age at systemic HT initiation (<60 vs ≥60 years) did not affect the death risk reductions., Conclusion: Estradiol-based HT use is associated with a reduced risk of death from both VD and AD, but the risk reduction is larger and appears sooner in VD than AD., (Copyright © 2017 by the Endocrine Society)

Study Question: Does the use of post-menopausal vaginal estradiol (VE) affect the mortality risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke., Summary Answer: The use of VE reduces the risk for cardiovascular mortality., What Is Known Already: A growing number of women use VE for post-menopausal genitourinary symptoms. Although this therapy is intended to have only local effects, estrogen is absorbed into the blood circulation and thus VE use may also have systemic effects., Study Design, Size, Duration: We studied a nationwide cohort in Finland 1994-2009 during which post-menopausal women (n = 195 756) initiated the use of VE (age [mean ± SD] 65.7 ± 10.9 years). Follow-up data gathered 1.4 million women-years and we assessed the mortality risk due to CHD (n= 9656) or stroke (n = 4294)., Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: The mortality risk in VE users was compared with that in the age-matched background population (standardized mortality ratio; [SMR]; 95% confidence interval) and related to various durations of exposure to VE (1 to ≤3, >3 to ≤5, >5 to ≤10 and >10 years)., Main Results and the Role of Chance: The use of VE was accompanied by decreases in the risk for CHD and stroke death. The risk reduction for CHD death was highest for >3 to ≤5 years exposure (SMR 0.64; 0.57-0.70) and for stroke for >5 to ≤10 years exposure (SMR 0.64; 0.57-0.72). The risk reductions for both CHD and stroke mortality were detected in all age groups with the highest risk reduction being in women aged 50-59 years (SMR 0.43; 0.19-0.88 and SMR 0.21; 0.06-0.58, respectively)., Limitations, Reasons for Caution: Our series lack a placebo arm and thus, may harbor a healthy woman bias. Moreover, data on clinical variables such as weight, smoking, blood pressure and family background were unobtainable for this study. Women using both VE and systemic hormone therapy (HT) were included in the comparator background population. This should not cause any significant error because the proportion of women using VE or other HT was modest (<10% in age-matched population) and because the use of systemic HT also reduces death risks in the same population. Our data cannot be directly applied for local regimens containing conjugated equine estrogens, because they are absorbed differently and may show effects that differ from those of estradiol., Wider Implications of the Findings: In 1000 women using VE for up to 10 years, a maximum of 24 fewer CHD deaths and 18 fewer stroke deaths is likely to occur., Study Funding/competing Interests: This work was supported by unrestricted grants from the Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation, the Emil Aaltonen Foundation, the Finnish Medical Foundation, Finska Läkaresällskapet, the Orion Farmos Research Foundation, the Paavo Nurmi Foundation and a special governmental grant for health sciences research. The funding sources had no role in the study design, data handling or manuscript preparation. EPID Research is a company that performs financially supported studies for several pharmaceutical companies. Dr Korhonen, Dr Hoti and MSc Vattulainen, employed by Epid Research, report financial activities from several other pharmaceutical companies outside the submitted work. Dr Mikkola has been a speaker and/or received consulting fees from Mylan and Novo Nordisk. Dr Tuomikoski has been a speaker and/or received consulting fees from Orion and Mylan. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: Data on the health benefits and risks of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) are derived mainly from the use of conjugated equine estrogens. Estradiol-based regimens may have a different risk-benefit profile. We evaluated the risk of death caused by coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, or any disease among users of estradiol-based HT regimens in a nationwide study in Finland., Methods: A total of 489,105 women who used HT from 1994 to 2009 (3.3 million HT exposure years), as indicated in the nationwide reimbursement register and the national Cause of Death Register, were followed. A total of 28,734 HT users died during follow-up; among the deaths, 3,843 were caused by CHD and 2,464 were caused by stroke. Mortality risk in HT users with varying duration of exposure (≤1 y, >1 to 3 y, >3 to 5 y, >5 to 10 y, or >10 y) was compared with that in an age-matched background population., Results: Risk of CHD death was significantly reduced by 18% to 54% in HT users and was positively related to HT exposure time. Risk of stroke death was also reduced by 18% to 39%, but this reduction was not clearly related to HT exposure time. Risk of all-cause mortality was reduced in HT users by 12% to 38%, almost in linear relationship with duration of exposure. All these risk reductions were comparable in women initiating HT before age 60 years and women initiating HT at age 60 years or older., Conclusions: In absolute terms, the risk reductions mean 19 fewer CHD deaths and 7 fewer stroke deaths per 1,000 women using any HT for at least 10 years.

Objective: We assessed the impact of hot flashes and various forms of hormone therapy on health-related quality of life and sexual well-being in recently postmenopausal women., Methods: We prospectively interviewed 150 healthy women about hot flashes and health-related quality of life (using the Women's Health Questionnaire and the McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire), menopause-related symptoms, and general health. The women were classified into those with (n = 72) and without (n = 78) hot flashes and treated for 6 months with transdermal estradiol (1 mg/d), oral estradiol (2 mg/d) with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate (5 mg/d), or placebo., Results: At baseline, hot flashes contributed most strongly to poor sleep (correlation coefficient r = -0.525, P < 0.0001), somatic symptoms such as muscle pains (r = -0.348, P < 0.0001), menstrual cycle-resembling complaints (r = -0.304, P < 0.0001), anxiety and fears (r = -0.283, P < 0.0001), decreased memory and concentration (r = -0.279, P = 0.001), and sexual behavior (r = -0.174, P = 0.035). The different hormone therapy regimens alleviated hot flashes equally effectively and were therefore combined into a single group for further analysis. In women with baseline flashes, hormone therapy use significantly improved the scores for sleep (0.787 [0.243] vs 0.557 [0.249], hormone therapy vs placebo, P = 0.001, at 6 mo), memory and concentration capacity (0.849 [0.228] vs 0.454 [0.301], P < 0.0001, at 6 mo), and anxiety and fears (0.942 [0.133] vs 0.826 [0.193], P = 0.005, at 6 mo). Hormone therapy use showed no significant impact on these variables in women without baseline flashes., Conclusions: Hot flashes contribute differently to various variables affecting health-related quality of life shortly after menopause. Estradiol or an estradiol-medroxyprogesterone acetate combination similarly alleviates hot flashes and improves health-related quality of life in relation to elimination of hot flashes. Hormone therapy use does not confer any detectable quality-of-life benefit over placebo in women without disturbing baseline flashes.

Objectives: To compare the responses of heart rate and blood pressure to various autonomic tests in women with and without pre-treatment hot flushes during estradiol and estradiol+medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) use., Study Design and Main Outcome Measures: Hundred and fifty recently postmenopausal women (72 with and 78 without hot flushes) were randomized to receive transdermal estradiol (1mg/day), oral estradiol (2 mg/day) alone or in combination with MPA (5mg/day), or placebo for six months. Cardiovascular responsiveness was comprehensively assessed with controlled and deep breathing, active orthostatic test, Valsalva maneuver and handgrip test., Results: Hot flushes were accompanied with a significant reduction (-2.2±0.7 vs. 1.3±1.1 beats/min, p=0.03) in resting heart rate during estradiol-only treatment; the route of estradiol administration was no factor in this regard. This effect was attenuated by the addition of MPA to oral estradiol. Hot flushes were also associated with reduced maximal heart rate in response to handgrip during the use of estradiol-only therapy (-2.2±1.3 vs. 2.8±1.5 beats/min, p=0.038); again, the MPA addition eliminated this effect. Hot flushes were accompanied with lowered resting but augmented blood pressure responses to handgrip test during all hormone regimens, whereas in women without hot flushes estradiol-only regimen tended to elevate diastolic resting blood pressure., Conclusions: Hot flushes appear as determinants for cardiovascular responses to hormone therapy. Estradiol-only therapy causes beneficial changes in cardiovascular regulation in flushing women, and these are blunted, in part, by the addition of MPA., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Blood pressure (BP) is one of the most powerful determinants of cardiovascular risk in women. This risk may differ between post-menopausal women with and without vasomotor hot flushes, possibly indicating different vascular responses to hormone therapy (HT). Thus, we compared in a clinical trial the effect of HT on ambulatory BP in normotensive, recently post-menopausal women with or without severe hot flushes., Methods: A total of 147 women recorded prospectively their hot flushes for 2 weeks; 70 women were symptomatic (>or=7 moderate/severe hot flush episodes/day), whereas 77 women were defined as asymptomatic (

Objective: To compare the vascular responses to hormone therapy in women with and without hot flushes., Methods: We randomly assigned 143 healthy, recently postmenopausal women (mean age 52.4+/-0.2 years, time since menopause 19.5+/-0.9 months) with intolerable hot flushes (more than seven moderate/severe episodes per day) or tolerable hot flushes (fewer than three mild episodes per day) to receive 1 mg of transdermal estradiol gel, oral estradiol (2 mg) with and without daily medroxyprogesterone acetate, or placebo for 6 months. Vascular function was assessed by pulse-wave analysis and endothelial function testing with nitroglycerin and salbutamol challenges., Results: Hot flushes did not affect the changes in arterial or aortic stiffness or endothelial function in response to various forms of hormone therapy. However, in women with tolerable hot flushes, oral estradiol caused a decrease of 13.2% (P=.028) in the time to the first systolic peak (dependent on the rapid phase of ventricular ejection) after nitroglycerin. In addition, the time to the reflected wave (dependent on pulse-wave velocity) after nitroglycerin was decreased by 8.4% (P=.018). These effects were not seen in women with intolerable hot flushes or with the other treatment regimens., Conclusion: Women without troublesome hot flushes are susceptible to unfavorable vascular effects after oral estrogen treatment, resulting in less compliant vasculature., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00668603., Level of Evidence: I.

Objective: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy predisposes women to liver disorders years after affected pregnancy. We compared the basal levels and responses of hyaluronic acid, a marker of liver fibrosis, and liver transaminases to postmenopausal hormone therapy in women with (n = 20) and without (n = 20) a history of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy., Study Design: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial., Results: Basal levels of hyaluronic acid were similar in both groups. Two weeks of oral estradiol 2.0 mg/day led to significant but similar (10.9% to 15.4%) rises in hyaluronic acid in both groups. Increasing the dose of oral estradiol to 4.0 mg/day resulted in normalization of the levels, whereas the addition of medroxyprogesterone acetate led to falls (11.0% to 10.7 %) in hyaluronic acid. Transdermal estradiol 50 microg led to a rise (3.2 %) in hyaluronic acid only in the control group. Other liver markers were normal at baseline and during hormone therapy., Conclusion: Normal basal levels and/or normal responses of hyaluronic acid and other liver markers to hormone therapy in women with previous intrahepatic cholestasis suggest that this therapy does not predispose these women to liver diseases.

Objective The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study clarified the indications and contraindications for postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT). We studied the impact of the WHI results on the risk of fatal stroke in HT users in Finland. Study design Retrospective analysis setting : Nationwide registers on postmenopausal HT use and causes of death between 1995 and 2009. Population Women ≥40 years ( n = 290,272) using systemic estradiol-based postmenopausal HT. Methods Follow-up started from the first HT purchase during the pre-WHI era (1995–2001) and post-WHI era (2002–2009). Main outcome measures Stroke deaths in HT users were compared with that in the age-matched background population and expressed as standardized mortality ratio (SMR) with 95% confidence intervals. Results Overall, 311 HT users died due to stroke. The exposure to HT ≤1 year was associated with a similarly reduced 22% (0.67–0.91) risk of stroke death in the pre-WHI era and in the post-WHI era 27% (0.55–0.94). The risk reductions for HT exposure of 1–8 years in the pre-WHI era (47%, 0.42–0.65) did not differ from that in the post-WHI era (32%, 0.48–0.94). The discontinuation of HT was accompanied by a significant 33% (1.02–1.72) increase in stroke death risk in the pre-WHI era and a non-significant 32% (0.84–1.99) increase in the post-WHI era within the first post-treatment year, but no longer after 1–8 years. Conclusions The change in prescribing policy after the WHI study did not affect the risk of fatal stroke in Finnish HT users. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hot flushes are complained of by approximately 75% of all postmenopausal women, and hormone therapy (HT) is the most effective way to alleviate them. Hot flushes are characterized by altered vascular function and sympathetic nervous system activity. Hot flushes occurred more often in women attending large, non-randomized observational studies (e.g. Nurses'' Health Study), where HT use protected against cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, they were absent (or mild) in randomized HT trials where HT use was accompanied with an elevated risk for CVD. Hot flushes, if a factor for cardiovascular health, could partly explain the conflict between observational and randomized trials. Several cross-sectional studies imply that hot flushes are detrimental to the cardiovascular system. However, the data are not uniform, and hot flushes were recalled retrospectively or during HT use. In our prospective study hot flushes were accompanied with a vasodilatory effect during endothelial testing, and this was related to the severity of hot flushes. Night-time hot flushes were followed with transient rises in ambulatory blood pressure (BP). However, no effect of hot flushes on diurnal BP was detected. The use of estradiol showed no harmful effects on endothelial function in women with hot flushes, but in non-flushing women oral, but not transdermal, estradiol led to vasoconstrictive changes. Estradiol complemented with medroxyprogesterone acetate eliminated the vasoconstrictive effect of sole oral estradiol. Thus, both oral and transdermal estradiol are applicable in flushing women, whereas a transdermal route should be favored in non-flushing women if used e.g. for bone protection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]