Search

Resistance to endocrine therapy remains a major clinical problem in breast cancer. Genetic studies highlight the potential role of estrogen receptor-α (ESR1) mutations, which show increased prevalence in the metastatic, endocrine-resistant setting. No naturally occurring ESR1 mutations have been reported in in vitro models of BC either before or after the acquisition of endocrine resistance making functional consequences difficult to study. We report the first discovery of naturally occurring ESR1 Y537C and ESR1 Y537S mutations in MCF7 and SUM44 ESR1-positive cell lines after acquisition of resistance to long-term-estrogen-deprivation (LTED) and subsequent resistance to fulvestrant (ICIR). Mutations were enriched with time, impacted on ESR1 binding to the genome and altered the ESR1 interactome. The results highlight the importance and functional consequence of these mutations and provide an important resource for studying endocrine resistance.

Background: The efficacy and safety of palbociclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, combined with fulvestrant and goserelin was assessed in premenopausal women with advanced breast cancer (ABC) who had progressed on prior endocrine therapy (ET)., Patients and Methods: One hundred eight premenopausal endocrine-refractory women ≥18 years with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) ABC were among 521 women randomized 2:1 (347:174) to fulvestrant (500 mg) ± goserelin with either palbociclib (125 mg/day orally, 3 weeks on, 1 week off) or placebo. This analysis assessed whether the overall tolerable safety profile and significant progression-free survival (PFS) improvement extended to premenopausal women. Potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and ovarian suppression with goserelin were assessed via plasma pharmacokinetics and biochemical analyses, respectively. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01942135) RESULTS: Median PFS for premenopausal women in the palbociclib ( n  = 72) versus placebo arm ( n  = 36) was 9.5 versus 5.6 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.50, 95% confidence interval: 0.29-0.87), and consistent with the significant PFS improvement in the same arms for postmenopausal women. Any-grade and grade ≤3 neutropenia, leukopenia, and infections were among the most frequent adverse events reported in the palbociclib arm with concurrent goserelin administration. Hormone concentrations were similar between treatment arms and confirmed sustained ovarian suppression. Clinically relevant DDIs were not observed., Conclusion: Palbociclib combined with fulvestrant and goserelin was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for premenopausal women with prior endocrine-resistant HR+/HER2- ABC. Inclusion of both premenopausal and postmenopausal women in pivotal combination ET trials facilitates access to novel drugs for young women and should be considered as a new standard for clinical trial design., Implications for Practice: PALOMA-3, the first registrational study to include premenopausal women in a trial investigating a CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with endocrine therapy, has the largest premenopausal cohort reported in an endocrine-resistant setting. In pretreated premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer, palbociclib plus fulvestrant and goserelin (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonist) treatment almost doubled median progression-free survival (PFS) and significantly increased the objective response rate versus endocrine monotherapy, achieving results comparable to those reported for chemotherapy without apparently interfering with LHRH agonist-induced ovarian suppression. The significant PFS gain and tolerable safety profile strongly support use of this regimen in premenopausal women with endocrine-resistant disease who could possibly delay chemotherapy., (© AlphaMed Press 2017.)

Purpose: ESR1 mutations are selected by prior aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy in advanced breast cancer. We assessed the impact of ESR1 mutations on sensitivity to standard therapies in two phase III randomized trials that represent the development of the current standard therapy for estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer., Materials and Methods: In a prospective-retrospective analysis, we assessed ESR1 mutations in available archived baseline plasma from the SoFEA (Study of Faslodex Versus Exemestane With or Without Arimidex) trial, which compared exemestane with fulvestrant-containing regimens in patients with prior sensitivity to nonsteroidal AI and in baseline plasma from the PALOMA3 (Palbociclib Combined With Fulvestrant in Hormone Receptor-Positive HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer After Endocrine Failure) trial, which compared fulvestrant plus placebo with fulvestrant plus palbociclib in patients with progression after receiving prior endocrine therapy. ESR1 mutations were analyzed by multiplex digital polymerase chain reaction., Results: In SoFEA, ESR1 mutations were found in 39.1% of patients (63 of 161), of whom 49.1% (27 of 55) were polyclonal, with rates of mutation detection unaffected by delays in processing of archival plasma. Patients with ESR1 mutations had improved progression-free survival (PFS) after taking fulvestrant (n = 45) compared with exemestane (n = 18; hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.92; P = .02), whereas patients with wild-type ESR1 had similar PFS after receiving either treatment (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.67; P = .77). In PALOMA3, ESR1 mutations were found in the plasma of 25.3% of patients (91 of 360), of whom 28.6% (26 of 91) were polyclonal, with mutations associated with acquired resistance to prior AI. Fulvestrant plus palbociclib improved PFS compared with fulvestrant plus placebo in both ESR1 mutant (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.74; P = .002) and ESR1 wild-type patients (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.70; P < .001)., Conclusion: ESR1 mutation analysis in plasma after progression after prior AI therapy may help direct choice of further endocrine-based therapy. Additional confirmatory studies are required., (© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Candidate gene studies have reported CYP19A1 variants to be associated with endometrial cancer and with estradiol (E2) concentrations. We analyzed 2937 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 6608 endometrial cancer cases and 37 925 controls and report the first genome wide-significant association between endometrial cancer and a CYP19A1 SNP (rs727479 in intron 2, P=4.8×10(-11)). SNP rs727479 was also among those most strongly associated with circulating E2 concentrations in 2767 post-menopausal controls (P=7.4×10(-8)). The observed endometrial cancer odds ratio per rs727479 A-allele (1.15, CI=1.11-1.21) is compatible with that predicted by the observed effect on E2 concentrations (1.09, CI=1.03-1.21), consistent with the hypothesis that endometrial cancer risk is driven by E2. From 28 candidate-causal SNPs, 12 co-located with three putative gene-regulatory elements and their risk alleles associated with higher CYP19A1 expression in bioinformatical analyses. For both phenotypes, the associations with rs727479 were stronger among women with a higher BMI (Pinteraction=0.034 and 0.066 respectively), suggesting a biologically plausible gene-environment interaction., (© 2016 The authors.)

PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling plays an important role in breast cancer. Its interaction with estrogen receptor (ER) signaling becomes more complex and interdependent with acquired endocrine resistance. Targeting mTOR combined with endocrine therapy has shown clinical utility; however, a negative feedback loop exists downstream of PI3K/AKT/mTOR. Direct blockade of AKT together with endocrine therapy may improve breast cancer treatment. AZD5363, a novel pan-AKT kinase catalytic inhibitor, was examined in a panel of ER(+) breast cancer cell lines (MCF7, HCC1428, T47D, ZR75.1) adapted to long-term estrogen deprivation (LTED) or tamoxifen (TamR). AZD5363 caused a dose-dependent decrease in proliferation in all cell lines tested (GI50 < 500 nmol/L) except HCC1428 and HCC1428-LTED. T47D-LTED and ZR75-LTED were the most sensitive of the lines (GI50 ∼ 100 nmol/L). AZD5363 resensitized TamR cells to tamoxifen and acted synergistically with fulvestrant. AZD5363 decreased p-AKT/mTOR targets leading to a reduction in ERα-mediated transcription in a context-specific manner and concomitant decrease in recruitment of ER and CREB-binding protein (CBP) to estrogen response elements located on the TFF1, PGR, and GREB1 promoters. Furthermore, AZD5363 reduced expression of cell-cycle-regulatory proteins. Global gene expression highlighted ERBB2-ERBB3, ERK5, and IGFI signaling pathways driven by MYC as potential feedback-loops. Combined treatment with AZD5363 and fulvestrant showed synergy in an ER(+) patient-derived xenograft and delayed tumor progression after cessation of therapy. These data support the combination of AZD5363 with fulvestrant as a potential therapy for breast cancer that is sensitive or resistant to E-deprivation or tamoxifen and that activated AKT is a determinant of response, supporting the need for clinical evaluation., (©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Endocrine therapies include aromatase inhibitors and the selective estrogen receptor (ER) downregulator fulvestrant. This study aimed to determine whether the reported efficacy of fulvestrant over anastrozole, and high- over low-dose fulvestrant, reflect distinct transcriptional responses., Experimental Design: Global gene expression profiles from ERα-positive breast carcinomas before and during presurgical treatment with fulvestrant (n = 22) or anastrozole (n = 81), and corresponding in vitro models, were compared. Transcripts responding differently to fulvestrant and estrogen deprivation were identified and integrated using Gene Ontology, pathway and network analyses to evaluate their potential significance., Results: The overall transcriptional response to fulvestrant and estrogen deprivation was correlated (r = 0.61 in presurgical studies, r = 0.87 in vitro), involving downregulation of estrogen-regulated and proliferation-associated genes. The transcriptional response to fulvestrant was of greater magnitude than estrogen deprivation (slope = 0.62 in presurgical studies, slope = 0.63 in vitro). Comparative analyses identified 28 genes and 40 Gene Ontology categories affected differentially by fulvestrant. Seventeen fulvestrant-specific genes, including CAV1/2, SNAI2, and NRP1, associated with ERα, androgen receptor (AR), and TP53, in a network regulating cell cycle, death, survival, and tumor morphology. Eighteen genes responding differently to fulvestrant specifically predicted antiproliferative response to fulvestrant, but not anastrozole. Transcriptional effects of low-dose fulvestrant correlated with high-dose treatment, but were of lower magnitude (ratio = 0.29)., Conclusions: The transcriptional response to fulvestrant has much in common with estrogen deprivation, but is stronger with distinctions potentially attributable to arrest of estrogen-independent ERα activity and involvement of AR signaling. Genes responding differently to fulvestrant may have predictive utility. These data are consistent with the clinical efficacy of fulvestrant versus anastrozole and higher dosing regimens., (©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Prospective cohort studies examining sex hormones in relation to cancer risk have generally collected blood samples at 1 time point, with an assumption that hormone levels measured in these samples will be reliable markers of true levels at other times. In postmenopausal women, body fat is a major source of estradiol; therefore, changes in adiposity may affect the correlation of single measurements to more relevant long-term averages. To estimate the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for estradiol and testosterone, we collected repeat blood samples from 119 postmenopausal women (average age = 59.4 (standard deviation, 4.7) years) from the United Kingdom during 2004-2005 and again during 2010-2011. The ICCs (adjusted for assay variation) were 0.73 (95% confidence interval: 0.63, 0.82) for total estradiol and 0.59 (95% confidence interval: 0.47, 0.72) for total testosterone. The ICCs were 3%-5% larger after adjustment for change in body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)(2)) or leptin, which are 2 markers of change in adiposity. There was no increase in ICCs after adjustment for change in age, alcohol consumption, smoking, exercise, time between waking and blood collection, or season. The results suggest that other factors account for within-woman variation in these sex hormones.

Background: Mammographic density and sex hormone levels are strong risk factors for breast cancer, but it is unclear whether they represent the same aetiological entity or are independent risk factors., Methods: Within the Breakthrough Generations Study cohort, we conducted a case-control study of 265 postmenopausal breast cancer cases and 343 controls with prediagnostic mammograms and blood samples. Plasma was assayed for oestradiol, testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations and mammographic density assessed by Cumulus., Results: Oestradiol and testosterone were negatively and SHBG positively associated with percentage density and absolute dense area, but after adjusting for body mass index the associations remained significant only for SHBG. Breast cancer risk was independently and significantly positively associated with percentage density (P=0.002), oestradiol (P=0.002) and testosterone (P=0.007) levels. Women in the highest tertile of both density and sex hormone level were at greatest risk, with an odds ratio of 7.81 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.89-21.1) for oestradiol and 4.57 (95% CI: 1.75-11.9) for testosterone and high density compared with those who were in the lowest tertiles. The cumulative risk of breast cancer in the highest oestradiol and density tertiles, representing 8% of controls, was estimated as 12.8% at ages 50-69 years and 19.4% at ages 20-79 years, and in the lowest tertiles was 1.7% and 4.3%, respectively. Associations of breast cancer risk with tertiles of mammographic dense area were less strong than for percentage density., Conclusions: Endogenous sex hormone levels and mammographic density are independent risk factors for postmenopausal breast cancer, which in combination can identify women who might benefit from increased frequency of screening and chemoprophylaxis.

Background: The optimum endocrine treatment for postmenopausal women with advanced hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer that has progressed on non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs) is unclear. The aim of the SoFEA trial was to assess a maximum double endocrine targeting approach with the steroidal anti-oestrogen fulvestrant in combination with continued oestrogen deprivation., Methods: In a composite, multicentre, phase 3 randomised controlled trial done in the UK and South Korea, postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer (oestrogen receptor [ER] positive, progesterone receptor [PR] positive, or both) were eligible if they had relapsed or progressed with locally advanced or metastatic disease on an NSAI (given as adjuvant for at least 12 months or as first-line treatment for at least 6 months). Additionally, patients had to have adequate organ function and a WHO performance status of 0-2. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscular injection on day 1, followed by 250 mg doses on days 15 and 29, and then every 28 days) plus daily oral anastrozole (1 mg); fulvestrant plus anastrozole-matched placebo; or daily oral exemestane (25 mg). Randomisation was done with computer-generated permuted blocks, and stratification was by centre and previous use of an NSAI as adjuvant treatment or for locally advanced or metastatic disease. Participants and investigators were aware of assignment to fulvestrant or exemestane, but not of assignment to anastrozole or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00253422 (UK) and NCT00944918 (South Korea)., Findings: Between March 26, 2004, and Aug 6, 2010, 723 patients underwent randomisation: 243 were assigned to receive fulvestrant plus anastrozole, 231 to fulvestrant plus placebo, and 249 to exemestane. Median PFS was 4·4 months (95% CI 3·4-5·4) in patients assigned to fulvestrant plus anastrozole, 4·8 months (3·6-5·5) in those assigned to fulvestrant plus placebo, and 3·4 months (3·0-4·6) in those assigned to exemestane. No difference was recorded between the patients assigned to fulvestrant plus anastrozole and fulvestrant plus placebo (hazard ratio 1·00, 95% CI 0·83-1·21; log-rank p=0·98), or between those assigned to fulvestrant plus placebo and exemestane (0·95, 0·79-1·14; log-rank p=0·56). 87 serious adverse events were reported: 36 in patients assigned to fulvestrant plus anastrozole, 22 in those assigned to fulvestrant plus placebo, and 29 in those assigned to exemestane. Grade 3-4 adverse events were rare; the most frequent were arthralgia (three in the group assigned to fulvestrant plus anastrozole; seven in that assigned to fulvestrant plus placebo; eight in that assigned to exemestane), lethargy (three; 11; 11), and nausea or vomiting (five; two; eight)., Interpretation: After loss of response to NSAIs in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer, maximum double endocrine treatment with 250 mg fulvestrant combined with oestrogen deprivation is no better than either fulvestrant alone or exemestane., (Copyright © 2013 Johnston et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-SA. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Context: Endogenous sex hormones are risk factors for postmenopausal breast cancer. A potential route for favorable hormonal modification is weight loss., Objective: The objective of the study was to measure change in plasma estradiol and testosterone levels in postmenopausal women in relation to change in body mass index (BMI) and plasma leptin., Setting: The setting was a cohort study of over 100,000 female volunteers from the general population, United Kingdom., Participants: The participants were a sample of 177 postmenopausal women aged over 45 years who provided blood samples during 2004-2005 and again during 2010-2011., Main Outcome Measure: Outcomes were percentage change in plasma estradiol and testosterone levels per 1 kg/m² change in BMI and per 1 ng/mL change in plasma leptin., Results: Among women with reduction in BMI, estradiol decreased 12.7% (95% confidence interval: [6.4%, 19.5%]; P < .0001) per kg/m² and among women with increased BMI estradiol increased 6.4% [0.2%, 12.9%] (P = .042). The corresponding figures for testosterone were 10.7% [3.0%, 19.0%] (P = .006) and 1.9% [-5.4%, 9.7%] (P = .61) per kg/m². For women with decreases and increases in leptin, estradiol decreased by 3.6% [1.3%, 6.0%] (P = .003) per ng/mL and increased by 1.7% [-0.3%, 3.6%] (P = .094), respectively. The corresponding figures for testosterone were 4.8% [2.0%, 7.8%] (P = .009) and 0.3% [-2.0%, 2.6%] (P = .82) per ng/mL., Conclusions: In postmenopausal women, changes in BMI and plasma leptin occurring over several years are associated with changes in estradiol and testosterone levels. The results suggest that fat loss by an individual can result in substantial decreases in postmenopausal estradiol and testosterone levels and provides support for weight management to lessen breast cancer risk.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have successfully identified common genetic variants that contribute to breast cancer risk. Discovering additional variants has become difficult, as power to detect variants of weaker effect with present sample sizes is limited. An alternative approach is to look for variants associated with quantitative traits that in turn affect disease risk. As exposure to high circulating estradiol and testosterone, and low sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) levels is implicated in breast cancer etiology, we conducted GWAS analyses of plasma estradiol, testosterone, and SHBG to identify new susceptibility alleles. Cancer Genetic Markers of Susceptibility (CGEMS) data from the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), and Sisters in Breast Cancer Screening data were used to carry out primary meta-analyses among ~1600 postmenopausal women who were not taking postmenopausal hormones at blood draw. We observed a genome-wide significant association between SHBG levels and rs727428 (joint β = -0.126; joint P = 2.09 × 10(-16)), downstream of the SHBG gene. No genome-wide significant associations were observed with estradiol or testosterone levels. Among variants that were suggestively associated with estradiol (P<10(-5)), several were located at the CYP19A1 gene locus. Overall results were similar in secondary meta-analyses that included ~900 NHS current postmenopausal hormone users. No variant associated with estradiol, testosterone, or SHBG at P<10(-5) was associated with postmenopausal breast cancer risk among CGEMS participants. Our results suggest that the small magnitude of difference in hormone levels associated with common genetic variants is likely insufficient to detectably contribute to breast cancer risk.

PURPOSE To determine whether plasma estradiol (E2) levels are related to gene expression in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers in postmenopausal women. Materials and METHODS Genome-wide RNA profiles were obtained from pretreatment core-cut tumor biopsies from 104 postmenopausal patients with primary ER-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant anastrozole. Pretreatment plasma E2 levels were determined by highly sensitive radioimmunoassay. Genes were identified for which expression was correlated with pretreatment plasma E2 levels. Validation was performed in an independent set of 73 ER-positive breast cancers. Results The expression of many known estrogen-responsive genes and gene sets was highly significantly associated with plasma E2 levels (eg, TFF1/pS2, GREB1, PDZK1 and PGR; P < .005). Plasma E2 explained 27% of the average expression of these four average estrogen-responsive genes (ie, AvERG; r = 0.51; P < .0001), and a standardized mean of plasma E2 levels and ER transcript levels explained 37% (r, 0.61). These observations were validated in an independent set of 73 ER-positive tumors. Exploratory analysis suggested that addition of the nuclear coregulators in a multivariable analysis with ER and E2 levels might additionally improve the relationship with the AvERG. Plasma E2 and the standardized mean of E2 and ER were both significantly correlated with 2-week Ki67, a surrogate marker of clinical outcome (r = -0.179; P = .05; and r = -0.389; P = .0005, respectively). CONCLUSION Plasma E2 levels are significantly associated with gene expression of ER-positive breast cancers and should be considered in future genomic studies of ER-positive breast cancer. The AvERG is a new experimental tool for the study of putative estrogenic stimuli of breast cancer.

Background: Short-term trials indicate that intensive physical activity may influence endogenous sex hormone concentrations. However, the relationship between usual daily physical activity and endogenous hormones in postmenopausal women in the general population is still uncertain., Objective and Methods: To determine the relationship between usual physical activity and endogenous sex hormones in postmenopausal women. A cross-sectional population-based study of 2,082 postmenopausal women ages 55 to 81 years, residing in the general community of Norfolk, United Kingdom, and not currently using hormone replacement therapy were chosen to participate. Physical activity in the past 1 year was assessed using a validated questionnaire, and endogenous sex hormone and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations were determined., Results: Usual physical activity levels were inversely associated with circulating concentrations of testosterone and estradiol, testosterone/SHBG ratio, and positively associated with SHBG. These associations were only slightly attenuated after adjusting for potential covariates including body mass index, smoking status, alcohol intake, and reproductive variables. Testosterone concentrations and testosterone/SHBG ratios were 19% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 9-27%, P < 0.001] and 24.0% (95% CI, 13-34% P < 0.001) lower, respectively, whereas estradiol concentrations were 6% (95% CI, 0-12%; P < 0.05) lower in the highest compared with lowest activity levels, respectively. A decreasing trend for the estradiol/SHBG ratio and 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone concentrations was also observed. Androstenedione levels did not differ significantly according to physical activity., Conclusions: Higher usual physical activity levels among postmenopausal women seem to be related to lower endogenous testosterone and estradiol concentrations. This may be one mechanism that could partly explain the reported inverse relationship between physical activity and breast cancer risk in some studies.

Breast cancer accounts for 1 in 4 of all female cancers worldwide; approaching 13,000 women dying per year in the UK alone. Seventy five per cent of all diagnosed breast cancers are oestrogen receptor (ER) positive. Ovarian synthesis of oestrogens ceases at menopause and as breast cancer is more prevalent in postmenopausal women the non-ovarian sources of oestrogen are important in disease progression. There is now considerable evidence that associates increased breast cancer risk with prolonged exposure to oestrogens hence greater attention is now being given to determining whether the measurement of plasma oestrogen may assist in identifying chemoprevention target groups. Studies suggest that in most postmenopausal patients the intra-tumoural concentrations of oestrogens are up to 20-fold higher than those present in the plasma however, while the extent of biosynthesis of oestrogens within breast tissue is a major determinant of local exposure, plasma levels are a useful indicator of overall metabolism in peripheral tissues. As such it is important to understand factors that influence these measurements. This review summarises the impact of lifestyle such as body mass index, together with the role of genetic polymorphisms placed within the context of designing future epidemiological studies and breast cancer risk algorithms.

Context: Accurate measurement of low serum estradiol (E(2) < 30 pg/ml or < 110 pmol/liter) is needed to study relationships between endogenous E(2) and risks of diseases in older women., Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether an extraction-based (indirect) assay or a non-extraction-based (direct) assay correlates better with mass spectrometry and body mass index (BMI)., Design/setting: In a pilot study of 40 postmenopausal women, endogenous E(2) measurements from three indirect and four direct assay methods and gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) were compared. A confirmatory study compared an indirect and a direct assay, selected among those in the pilot study, to GC-MS/MS; this study was conducted in 374 postmenopausal women not taking hormone therapy from the Ultra Low-dose TRansdermal estrogen Assessment (ULTRA) trial., Main Outcomes: Pearson correlation coefficients among E(2) measurements by assay methods and BMI, and their confidence intervals, by bias-corrected bootstrap method, were used., Results: In the pilot study, E(2) by three indirect assays correlated better (P < 0.03) with GC-MS/MS and with BMI than measurements by four direct assays. In the confirmatory study, the indirect assay correlated better (P < 0.01) with GC-MS/MS and BMI than the direct assay. Measurements by the indirect and direct assays were overestimated, but deviations in direct assay measurements were less precise. Mean E(2) by the indirect and direct assays were higher (by 14 and 68%, respectively) and less reproducible than by GC-MS/MS., Conclusion: Until mass spectrometry is practical for wide use, extraction-based indirect assays may be preferable for measuring low postmenopausal serum E(2).

Paracrine interactions between adipose fibroblasts and malignant epithelial cells are essential for structural and hormonal support of breast tumors. Factors derived from malignant epithelial cells inhibit adipogenic differentiation of fibroblasts and upregulate expression of aromatase, which stimulates estrogen synthesis and creates a localized, growth-stimulatory environment. Here, we characterized the gene expression profile of breast adipose fibroblasts in an in vitro model of malignancy to identify other paracrine interactions that support tumor growth. Primary breast adipose fibroblasts from cancer-free women were treated with conditioned media from malignant breast epithelial cells or normal breast epithelial cells, and differences in gene expression were identified by microarray. A total of 79 differentially regulated genes encoding cytokines, enzymes, angiogenic factors, cytoskeletal proteins, extra-cellular matrix remodeling proteins, signal transduction proteins and cell surface receptors were identified, and 6 of these were verified by real-time PCR. Among these, the expression of aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C3 (AKR1C3) was upregulated. AKR1C3 has multiple enzymatic properties, including conversion of estrone to estradiol and androstenedione to testosterone. Immunoreactive AKR1C3 was detected in epithelial and stromal components of benign lesions and ductal carcinomas in situ, and in 59.8% of epithelial and 69.6% of stromal cells in invasive breast carcinomas. AKR1C3 expression was significantly higher in myoepithelial cells surrounding the neoplastic epithelium of ductal carcinoma in situ compared with those surrounding benign epithelial lesions. Importantly, AKR1C3 and aromatase mRNA levels correlated positively in 61 malignant breast tumors (R=0.3967, p=0.00156). Malignant epithelial cell-conditioned medium significantly increased formation of testosterone and estradiol from androstenedione in breast adipose fibroblasts. In conclusion, malignant epithelial cell-derived factors significantly upregulate the enzymes AKR1C3 and aromatase that catalyze a series of complementary reactions to convert the circulating precursor androstenedione to biologically active estradiol in vitro in the stromal fibroblasts, and in vivo, in stromal component of breast tumors.

Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are increasingly used in early breast cancer and there is a growing interest in associated long-term side-effects of profound estrogen suppression. Urogenital side-effects due to atrophic vaginitis are often managed with vaginal estrogen preparations. These are generally perceived to result in minimal systemic absorption of estrogen. We followed serum estradiol, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinising hormone (LH) levels in seven postmenopausal women using vaginal estrogen preparations whilst on AIs for breast cancer., Patients and Methods: Serum was analysed for estradiol, FSH and LH at baseline then 2, 4, 7-10 and 12 weeks since commencement of vaginal estradiol. Estradiol was measured on an assay specifically developed for measuring low levels in postmenopausal women., Results: Serum estradiol levels rose from baseline levels < or = 5 pmol/l consistent with AI therapy to a mean 72 pmol/l at 2 weeks. By 4 weeks this had decreased to < 35 pmol/l in the majority (median 16 pmol/l) although significant further rises were seen in two women., Conclusions: The vaginal estradiol tablet Vagifem significantly raises systemic estradiol levels, at least in the short term. This reverses the estradiol suppression achieved by aromatase inhibitors in women with breast cancer and is contraindicated.

Long-term culture of MCF-7 wild-type (wt) cells in steroid-depleted medium (LTED) results in hypersensitivity to oestradiol (E2) coinciding with elevated levels of ERalpha and enhanced growth factor signalling. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of the pure anti-oestrogen ICI 182,780 (ICI) with the competitive anti-oestrogen tamoxifen (TAM) on oestrogen and IGF signalling in these cells. Wt MCF-7 and LTED cells were treated with a log 7 concentration range of E2, TAM or ICI. Effects on cell growth, ERalpha transactivation, expression of ERalpha, ERbeta and components of the IGF pathway were measured with and without insulin. In the presence of insulin, growth of LTED cells was refractory to TAM but inhibited by ICI and E2. In the absence of insulin, LTED cells showed persistent hypersensitivity to E2, and remained inhibited by ICI but were largely unaffected by TAM. ICI but not TAM inhibited ER-mediated gene transcription and treatment with ICI resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in ERalpha levels whilst having no effect on ERbeta expression. IGF-I receptor and insulin receptor substrate 2 levels were increased in LTED versus the Wt MCF-7 cells, and ICI but not TAM reduced their expression in a dose-dependent fashion. Thus IGF signalling as well as ERalpha expression and function are enhanced during LTED. While the resultant cells are resistant to TAM, ICI down-regulates ERalpha, reducing IGF signalling and cell growth. These results support the use of ICI in women with ER-positive breast cancer who have relapsed on an aromatase inhibitor.

There is an increasing rationale for effective combinations of endocrine therapy with novel drugs that target aberrant signal transduction pathways in estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. Prolonged endocrine therapy can be associated with an acquired increase in peptide growth factor signaling (EGFR, HER2), together with cross-talk activation of ER-dependent gene transcription and cell growth that leads to endocrine resistance. Current approaches to target these pathways include both the selective ER downregulator fulvestrant, and various signal transduction inhibitors (STIs). Fulvestrant can overcome resistance to tamoxifen (TAM-R) and long-term estrogen deprivation (LTED-R) in experimental models by reducing ER expression, and represents a current option for post-menopausal women with endocrine resistant ER+ve breast cancer. Emerging data suggest that fulvestrant's effect may be greater when combined with estrogen deprivation, and several phase III trials are assessing fulvestrant combined with aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Small molecule STIs such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs) and mTOR antagonists are also active in breast cancer. Pre-clinical data suggest that combined endocrine/STI therapy may result in greater growth inhibition than either therapy alone, and thus delay emergence of resistance. Several clinical trials are now examining STIs combined with AIs both in the tamoxifen-resistant and first-line advanced breast cancer setting, while pre-surgical studies are investigating the efficacy of combined endocrine/STI therapy utilising biological primary endpoints. This article reviews the pre-clinical rationale for this strategy and the clinical trials in this area.

Cross-sectional studies investigating the relationship between phytoestrogens in diet, urine, or blood with plasma estradiol and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) have been inconclusive. We investigated the relationship among phytoestrogen exposure, polymorphisms in the ESR1, COMT, CYP19, and SHBG genes, and plasma estradiol and SHBG levels in 125 free-living postmenopausal women taking part in a cohort study (European Prospective Investigation of Cancer and Nutrition-Norfolk) using three different markers: dietary, urinary, and serum phytoestrogens. Phytoestrogen levels (daidzein, genistein, glycitein, O-desmethylangolensin, equol, enterodiol, and enterolactone) in spot urine and serum were analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry, respectively. Plasma estradiol and SHBG were measured by immunoassays. Adjusting for age and body mass index, urinary daidzein, genistein, glycitein, and serum daidzein and glycitein were negatively correlated with plasma estradiol (R = -0.199 to -0.277, P <0.03), with particularly strong associations found in the 18 women with CC genotype for ESR1 PvuII polymorphism (R = -0.597 to -0.834, P < 0.03). The negative correlations observed between isoflavones and estradiol in women as a whole became no longer significant when we excluded women with ESR1 PvuII CC genotype, indicating that the correlations observed were due mainly to this group of women. There was no relationship between dietary isoflavones and plasma estradiol and no association was found between any of the dietary, urinary, and serum phytoestrogen and plasma SHBG or between these factors and polymorphisms in CYP19, SHBG, and COMT. We conclude that higher isoflavone exposure is associated with lower plasma estradiol in postmenopausal women and that this preliminary study is suggestive of the involvement of diet-gene interactions.

Understanding the underlying mechanisms responsible for endocrine resistance remains a challenge in improving the treatment of breast cancer. The discovery that growth factor and estrogen receptor (ER) signaling pathways interact in endocrine resistant breast cancer has provided a rationale for disrupting these signaling cascades in ER-positive, endocrine-resistant tumors. In postmenopausal women, the ER signaling pathway may be targeted using fulvestrant ('Faslodex'), a new type of ER antagonist with no agonist effects. Fulvestrant binds, blocks and causes degradation of the ER, culminating in complete abrogation of estrogen-sensitive gene transcription. This unique mechanism of action may result in a lack of cross-resistance with other endocrine agents. Preclinical studies have confirmed the potential of fulvestrant to inhibit the growth of tamoxifen-resistant, as well as tamoxifen-sensitive, human breast cancer cell lines. Clinical studies have demonstrated that fulvestrant is an effective treatment option in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who have progressed on prior endocrine therapy. Furthermore, preclinical studies indicate that combining fulvestrant with growth factor targeted agents, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/HER1) tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib (IRESSA) or the anti-human HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab ('Herceptin'), may result in greater anti-tumor activity than either agent alone. A range of clinical trials are now ongoing to determine whether the combination of growth factor-targeting agents with fulvestrant will delay the onset of endocrine resistance and so provide new strategy for women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.

The third-generation non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are challenging tamoxifen as treatments of choice for early and advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease. However, patients who initially respond to AIs eventually develop resistance to treatment and experience disease progression. To establish the optimal endocrine therapy following AI resistance, it is essential to understand the mechanisms that contribute to the loss of response. Data from in vitro models have suggested that acquired AI resistance is due to enhanced sensitization to low estrogen levels during long-term estrogen deprivation (LTED). Cross-talk between the ER and various growth-factor-receptor signaling pathways, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and the insulin-like growth factor pathway, may also be implicated. Therefore, endocrine therapies that abolish estrogen signaling via removal of the ER could be effective in patients with AI-resistant disease. Fulvestrant ('Faslodex') is a new ER antagonist with no agonist effects that binds, blocks and degrades the ER. Due to its unique mode of action and lack of cross-resistance with existing treatments, fulvestrant is an effective therapeutic agent for use in sequential endocrine regimens. Fulvestrant has established efficacy in tamoxifen-resistant disease and there is a growing body of evidence demonstrating its efficacy in patients with AI-resistant disease. In preclinical models, MCF-7 cells undergoing LTED are refractory to tamoxifen but sensitive to fulvestrant, suggesting fulvestrant is a more appropriate choice following AI resistance. The steroidal AI, exemestane is also an option in non-steroidal AI-resistant disease. Clinical trials are underway to compare fulvestrant with exemestane as an appropriate therapy following the onset of AI resistance.

The determination of plasma oestradiol has numerous applications in epidemiology, reproductive medicine and breast cancer management. Commercially available analytical methods, which measure the hormone levels without prior purification, have been successfully developed for measuring oestradiol in premenopausal women. The application of these methodologies to the quantification of the very low levels of oestradiol in postmenopausal women is more problematic in terms of accuracy and interpretation. The importance of using appropriate methodology is discussed and illustrated with data demonstrating the disparity in the results obtained when low levels of oestradiol were quantified using direct and indirect methods.

The mechanisms involved in resistance to estrogen deprivation are of major importance for optimal patient therapy and the development of new drugs. Long term culture of MCF-7 cells in estrogen (E2)-depleted medium (long term estrogen deprivation; LTED) results in hypersensitivity to E2 coinciding with elevated levels of estrogen receptor (ER) alpha phosphorylated on Ser118 and MAPK, together with several of its downstream targets associated previously with ERalpha phosphorylation. Our data suggest elevated MAPK activity results from enhanced ERBB2 expression in the LTED cells versus the wild-type (wt), and treatment with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 revealed increased sensitivity in both transcription and proliferation assays. Similarly the MEK inhibitor U0126 decreased transcription and proliferation in the LTED cells and reduced their sensitivity to the proliferative effects of E2, while having no effect on the wt. However, the complete suppression of MAPK activity in the LTED cells did not inhibit ERalpha Ser118 phosphorylation suggesting that ER activity remained ligand-dependant. The LTED cells also expressed elevated levels of insulin-like growth factor-1R, and inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity with LY294002 reduced basal ERalpha transactivation by 70% in the LTED cells compared with the wt. However, LY294002 had no effect on ERalpha Ser118 phosphorylation. These data suggest that although elevated levels of MAPK occur during LTED and influence the phenotype, this is unlikely to be the sole pathway operating to achieve adaptation.

The growth dependence of many breast cancers on oestrogen has been exploited therapeutically by oestrogen deprivation, but almost all patients eventually develop resistance largely by unknown mechanisms. Wild-type (WT) MCF-7 cells were cultured in oestrogen-deficient medium for 90 weeks in order to establish a long-term oestrogen-deprived MCF-7 (LTED) which eventually became independent of exogenous oestrogen for growth. After 15 weeks of quiescence (LTED-Q), basal growth rate increased in parallel with increasing oestrogen sensitivity. While 10(-9)M oestradiol (E2) maximally stimulated WT growth, the hypersensitive LTED (LTED-H) were maximally growth stimulated by 10(-13)M E2. By week 50, hypersensitivity was apparently lost and the cells became oestrogen independent (LTED-I), although the pure antioestrogen ICI182780 still inhibited cell growth and reversed the inhibitory effect of 10(-9)M E2 at 10(-12) to 10(-7)M. Tamoxifen (10(-7) to 10(-6)M) had a partial agonist effect on WT, but had no stimulatory effect on LTED. Whilst LTED cells have a low progesterone receptor (PgR) expression in all phases, oestrogen receptor (ER) a expression was, on average, elevated five- and seven-fold in LTED-H and LTED-I, respectively, and serine118 was phosphorylated. ERbeta expression was up-regulated and the levels of insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) remained low throughout all phases. The levels of RIP140mRNA appeared to decrease to approximately 50% of the WT message in LTED-Q and remained constant into the hypersensitive phase. No significant changes were observed in the expression of SUG-1, TIF-1 and SMRT in LTED. The overall changes in nuclear receptor interacting proteins do not appear to be involved in the hypersensitivity. Thus, the resistance of these human breast cancer cells to oestrogen-deprivation appears to be due to acquired hypersensitivity which may be explained in part by increased levels of and phosphorylated ERalpha.

Background: This study was performed to determine whether drug action on breast tumours could also be analysed using a cell turnover index (CTI), a composite measurement of both proliferation and apoptosis., Materials and Methods: Data were obtained from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing three single doses (50, 125 and 250 mg) of intramuscular fulvestrant (Faslodex, previously known as ICI 182,780) with oral tamoxifen 20 mg/day for 14-21 days in women with early, operable, ER-positive breast cancer. CTI was calculated as the ratio of the proliferation index to the apoptotic index., Results: Fulvestrant 250 mg significantly reduced CTI compared with both placebo (p = 0.0003) and tamoxifen (p = 0.026). The effect on CTI with tamoxifen was not significantly different from that with placebo., Conclusion: This study suggests that CTI may be a useful indicator of drug action on breast tumour growth. A significant reduction in growth was found with fulvestrant 250 mg compared with tamoxifen.

7Alpha-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulfinyl)-nonyl]estra-1,3,5, (10)-triene-3,17beta-diol (ICI 182,780; Faslodex) is a novel steroidal antiestrogen. This partially blind, randomized, multicenter study compared the effects of single doses of long-acting ICI 182,780 with tamoxifen or placebo on estrogen receptor (ERalpha) and progesterone receptor (PgR) content, Ki67 proliferation-associated antigen labeling index (Ki67LI), and the apoptotic index in the primary breast tumors of postmenopausal women. Previously untreated patients (stages T(1)-T(3); ER-positive or -unknown) were randomized and received a single i.m. dose of ICI 182,780 50 mg (n = 39), ICI 182,780 125 mg (n = 38), or ICI 182,780 250 mg (n = 44) or oral tamoxifen 20 mg daily (n = 36) or matching tamoxifen placebo (n = 43) for 14-21 days before tumor resection surgery with curative intent. The ER and PgR H-scores, together with the Ki67LI were determined immunohistochemically in the matched pretreatment biopsy and the posttreatment surgical specimens. The apoptotic index was determined by terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling on the same samples. The effects of treatment on each of these parameters were compared using analysis of covariance. ICI 182,780 produced dose-dependent reductions in ER and PgR H-scores and in the Ki67LI. The reductions in ER expression were statistically significant at all doses of ICI 182,780 compared with placebo (ICI 182,780 50 mg, P = 0.026; 125 mg, P = 0.006; 250 mg, P = 0.0001), and for ICI 182,780 250 mg compared with tamoxifen (P = 0.024). For PgR H-score, there were statistically significant reductions after treatment with ICI 182,780 125 mg (P = 0.003) and 250 mg (P = 0.0002) compared with placebo. In contrast, tamoxifen produced a significant increase in the PgR H-score relative to placebo, and consequently, all doses of ICI 182,780 produced PgR values that were significantly lower than those in the tamoxifen-treated group. All doses of ICI 182,780 significantly reduced Ki67LI values compared with placebo (ICI 182,780 50 mg, P = 0.046; 125 mg, P = 0.001; 250 mg, P = 0.0002), but there were no significant differences between any doses of ICI 182,780 and tamoxifen. ICI 182,780 did not alter the apoptotic index when compared with either placebo or tamoxifen. Short-term exposure to ICI 182,780 reduces the ERalpha in breast tumor cells in a dose-dependent manner by down-regulating ER protein concentration. The reductions in tumor PgR content by ICI 182,780 demonstrate that ICI 182,780, unlike tamoxifen, is devoid of estrogen-agonist activity. Reductions in tumor cell proliferative activity (as indicated by Ki67LI) show that ICI 182,780 is likely to have antitumor activity in the clinical setting.

Background: A variety of markers, including Ki67, estrogen receptors (ER), and progesterone receptors (PgR), are frequently measured in fine needle aspirates (FNA) from human breast carcinomas. We used a human breast carcinoma cell line, MCF7, as a model system to investigate the use of laser scanning cytometry (LSC) for the measurement of these markers. Additionally, we measured the number of apoptotic cells., Methods: Cells were treated with drugs to vary the expression of markers and the number of apoptotic cells. They were then fixed on microscope slides. For LSC, the cells were stained for the different markers with fluorescein using immunofluorescence and for apoptotic cells using the TUNEL assay. The nuclei were counterstained with propidium iodide. A parallel set of slides was stained using horseradish peroxidase and diaminobenzidine and scored manually by conventional light microscopy., Results: The results from the LSC closely paralleled those obtained by manual scoring of immunohistochemical stains., Conclusions: It should be possible to use LSC for the routine measurement of nuclear markers in FNAs from human breast carcinomas., (Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Idoxifene is a novel selective estrogen (E2) receptor (ER) modulator that is currently in clinical development for the treatment of breast cancer. Compared to tamoxifen, idoxifene is metabolically more stable, with a higher relative binding affinity for the ER and reduced agonist activity on breast and uterine cells. Idoxifene also inhibits calmodulin, a calcium-binding protein that is involved in cell signal transduction pathways. In this study, the abilities of idoxifene and tamoxifen to antagonize E2-dependent MCF-7 xenograft growth in oophorectomized athymic mice were compared. The basis for idoxifene's antitumor activity was examined by comparing the effectiveness of the clinically used transisomer (referred to here as idoxifene) with its cis-isomer, which has a 50-fold lower relative binding affinity for ER than idoxifene but similar calmodulin-inhibitory activity. Changes in tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, and ER-dependent protein expression were studied. Both idoxifene and tamoxifen significantly inhibited E2-dependent tumor growth, whereas cis-idoxifene had little effect. Withdrawal of E2 support induced significant tumor regression due to impaired cell proliferation (Ki-67 score, 9 versus 51% compared to E2 controls) and induction of apoptosis (3.6 versus 0.9% compared to E2 controls). Both anti-E2s inhibited cell proliferation and caused a significant 3-fold induction of apoptosis in E2 supported tumors after 1 week, which was maintained for 3 months with idoxifene (3.1 versus 0.48% compared to E2 controls) but decreased back to baseline in tumors treated with tamoxifen (0.69%). In contrast, cis-idoxifene had no effect on either cell proliferation or apoptosis. Both tamoxifen and idoxifene initially induced ER expression, whereas prolonged therapy with tamoxifen significantly reduced progesterone receptor levels. In conclusion, idoxifene resulted in similar inhibition of E2-dependent MCF-7 xenograft growth compared with tamoxifen, an effect that is mediated via ER rather than through calmodulin. Sustained induction of apoptosis may contribute to prolonged antagonism of E2-dependent growth, and it occurred to a greater extent following 3 months of idoxifene, compared to tamoxifen.

The high potency and selectivity of new aromatase inhibitors has translated to greater efficacy and improved tolerability in comparison with established second-line hormonal agents for advanced breast cancer in phase III clinical trials. Two pharmacological studies are reported which assess the use of one of these inhibitors, vorozole, in combination or comparison with well-established methods of oestrogen deprivation in pre and postmenopausal patients. When combined with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) goserelin in 10 premenopausal patients, vorozole markedly enhanced the suppression of serum levels of oestrone, oestradiol and, oestrone sulphate beyond that achieved by goserelin alone (by a mean 74%, 83%, and 89%, respectively). The combination was well-tolerated and had no significant effects on androgen levels. Vorozole was compared with formestane in 13 postmenopausal women and serum oestrone, oestradiol, and oestrone sulphate levels were suppressed by 47%, 30%, and 70%, respectively, more by vorozole than by the steroidal aromatase inhibitor. Again the tolerability was excellent. The plasma oestrogen levels in the postmenopausal patients on vorozole were lower than in the premenopausal patients on goserelin plus vorozole, indicating that ovarian oestrogen synthesis may be relatively resistant to aromatase inhibition, even during GnRHa treatment. Thus, in both pre and postmenopausal patients substantially greater suppression of oestrogen can be achieved by vorozole compared with alternative approaches. Existing clinical-pharmacological correlates suggest that these increases in pharmacological effectiveness may result in enhanced clinical effectiveness.

Endocrine treatments for human breast cancer have been based largely upon the removal of estrogenic stimuli. The regression of tumors after estrogen deprivation has generally been characterized as being due to reduced proliferation but more recently has been recognized to also involve increased apoptosis. The aim of our experiments was to define the associated changes in certain proliferation- and cell death-related biological parameters after hormone withdrawal from estrogen-dependent MCF-7 xenografts in athymic nude mice using immunohistochemical techniques. The baseline estrogen receptor (ER) level of this MCF-7 xenograft was relatively low (average H score 23) but it was strongly Bcl-2-, PgR- and pS2-positive, indicating the functional integrity of estrogen signaling. Changes in proliferation (Ki-67), apoptosis, ER, progesterone receptor (PgR), cyclin D1, p27kip1, Bcl-2 and Bax expression were assessed during the 2 weeks after estrogen deprivation. ER levels rose markedly after estrogen ablation, whereas PgR levels fell to about 10% of baseline and pS2 levels halved. The proportion of Ki-67-positive cells was unchanged after 24 hr but by day 14 had reduced by about 80%. The normal levels of cyclin D1 also reduced after estrogen withdrawal in contrast to the rapid increase in levels of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27kip1. This latter increase appeared to occur in advance of the changes in Ki-67. The proportion of apoptotic cells increased from a mean 1.5% at baseline to 2.9% after 3 days and 4.7% after 14 days. There were reductions in both Bcl-2 and Bax staining but these appeared to be greater for Bcl-2, effectively decreasing the Bcl-2/Bax ratio. Our results provide a framework for the use of these parameters as intermediate markers in comparisons of hormonal agents for human breast cancer treatment.

Hormonal breast cancer therapies have traditionally been considered cytostatic, but recent pre-clinical data suggest that anti-oestrogens can induce apoptosis. The aim of this study was to assess whether tamoxifen (TAM) and ICI 182780 (ICI) could induce apoptosis in human breast cancer, and whether this was related to oestrogen receptor status. We measured apoptosis in primary breast cancer patients before and after pre-surgical treatment with 20 mg/day TAM (study 1) or 6 or 18 mg/day ICI (study 2). In each study there was a randomised non-treatment (NT) control group. TAM significantly increased apoptotic index (AI) in ER+ but not in ER- tumours. There was a significant increase in AI following treatment with ICI. Insufficient pairs of samples were available to determine whether this change was confined to ER+ tumours, but in a cross-sectional analysis AI was significantly higher in excision biopsies for ICI-treated than NT patients for ER+ but not ER- tumours. Our results provide clinical evidence that apoptosis may be induced in ER+ primary breast cancer by both non-steroidal and steroidal anti-oestrogens.

The associations between serum concentrations of oestradiol, progesterone, testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women were investigated in a prospective study of breast cancer on the island of Guernsey. Sixty-two women diagnosed with breast cancer an average of 8 years subsequent to blood collection were matched for day of menstrual cycle, age and year of blood collection with 182 control subjects. Cases had a 12% higher mean oestradiol concentration over the whole menstrual cycle (P = 0.17) with a large difference at mid-cycle (75% higher, P = 0.04). Differences between cases and control subjects in progesterone (luteal phase), testosterone and SHBG were small and not statistically significant: luteal phase progesterone 9% lower in cases, P = 0.64; testosterone 4% higher, P = 0.57; SHBG 8% higher, P = 0.24. The small difference in oestradiol concentration could be aetiologically important, but larger prospective studies are needed.

The relative efficacy and tolerability of the aromatase inhibitors anastrozole (Arimidex) and formestane are assessed in a direct comparative trial in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Final results are available and reported here only for oestradiol suppression. Patients were randomised to receive either oral anastrozole, 1 mg once daily, or formestane, 250 mg every 2 weeks intramuscularly. In the anastrozole group, mean serum oestradiol levels fell from 32.1 pmol/l at baseline to 6.5 pmol/l at week 1, and similar levels of suppression were maintained over the next 3 weeks. In the formestane group, mean serum oestradiol levels fell from 31.0 pmol/l at baseline to 9.5 pmol/l at the week 1 assessment. In this group, serum oestradiol levels tended to rise by the 2- and 4-week measurements, i.e. immediately before the next injection was due. Based on the 2- and 4-week measurements, the mean falls in oestradiol levels were 79 and 58% in the anastrozole and formestane groups, respectively (p = 0.0001). More effective and consistent suppression of oestradiol was achieved with anastrozole at the therapeutic dose of 1 mg once daily, orally, than with formestane at the standard dose of 250 mg every 2 weeks, intramuscularly.

Objective: GnRH analogues are being used increasingly for a number of oestrogen dependent conditions in women. The resultant profound hypo-oestrogenism is a disadvantage, however, but the preservation of pituitary sensitivity to negative feedback by oestradiol is not well defined. We have determined the effect on gonadotrophins and inhibin of GnRH analogue plus low-dose continuous combined hormone replacement therapy in comparison with GnRH analogue therapy alone., Design: Randomized controlled trial., Patients: Fifty premenopausal women with endometriosis randomized to treatment with goserelin alone (Group 1) or goserelin plus 17 beta-oestradiol and medroxyprogesterone acetate (Group 2)., Measurements: FSH, LH, oestradiol, oestrone, inhibin before and during treatment., Results: Oestradiol and oestrone were suppressed in both groups, but Group 2 had significantly higher oestradiol during the hormone replacement therapy period. LH was suppressed in both groups. In Group 1, FSH levels recovered during treatment but, in contrast, in Group 2, FSH levels remained suppressed throughout treatment. Inhibin was significantly lower in Group 2, but not in Group 1, during treatment compared to pretreatment., Conclusions: Pituitary secretion of FSH appears to remain responsive to feedback control by oestradiol during GnRH analogue therapy and is incompletely suppressed, unlike LH which remains completely suppressed. The possible mechanisms for this are discussed.

The new steroidal pure anti-oestrogen ICI 182780 was studied for the first time in pre-menopausal women. A total of 30 patients requiring hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease were randomized to ICI 182780, 12 mg/day i.m. (n = 19) or no treatment (n = 11) for 7 days prior to surgery. Immunohistochemical measurements were made in the snap-frozen, resected endometrium for oestrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PgR) and Ki67, a nuclear antigen whose expression is closely related to proliferation. Five control patients ovulated prior to surgery and, as expected, the secretory endometria had lower Ki67 antigen concentrations than endometria had lower proliferative phase. The endometria from patients treated with ICI 182780 had reduced Ki67 compared with controls. This demonstration of reduced proliferative activity indicates that the pharmacological effectiveness of the treatment was maintained despite increased plasma oestradiol concentrations. In contrast to results from rodents, ICI 182780 did not markedly reduce ER expression, although there was significantly lower ER in the myometrial cells of the treated group. The lack of effect on PgR shows a dissociation between the drug's effect on this oestrogen-dependent protein and its effects on proliferation.

This study investigated the influence of the aromatase inhibitor 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4OHA, formestane), given orally, on peripheral aromatase activity and plasma oestradiol (E2) levels in post-menopausal women with advanced breast cancer. The aim was to establish whether an optimal dose could be identified that had a pharmacological effectiveness comparable with that of parenteral 4OHA. A total of 13 post-menopausal women were studied before treatment and after a minimum of 4 weeks on treatment with one or more of the following doses: 125 mg once daily (od), 125 mg b.i.d. (bd) and 250 mg od. In all, seven aromatase studied were performed at 125 mg od; four, at 125 mg bd; and ten, at 250 mg od. Three patients were studied at all doses. E2 was measured concurrently and was available at all dose increments for seven patients. Given at doses of 125 mg od, 125 mg bd and 250 mg od, treatment with formestane inhibited in vivo aromatisation by 62.3% +/- 9.5%, 70.0% +/- 5.1% and 57.3% +/- 5.3%, respectively (mean +/- SEM). Corresponding values for plasma E2 suppression were 30.7% +/- 6.5%, 43.4% +/- 4.5% and 42.9% +/- 6.7%, respectively. Thus, apart from a somewhat better suppression of plasma E2 levels by the two higher doses as compared with 125 mg od, no significant difference in the degree of aromatase inhibition or plasma E2 suppression was observed. The suppression of E2 by oral 4OHA at 125 mg bd or 250 mg od approaches that achieved by the recommended parenteral schedule of 250 mg fortnightly, but inhibition of aromatase at this dose was substantially inferior. The findings are consistent with a hypothesis that 4OHA given orally may cause substantial plasma oestrogen suppression during part of the day, but neither the od nor the bd regimens investigated in the present study were capable of producing optimal aromatase inhibition.

Vorozole is an orally active, nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor. Twenty-four postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer who had relapsed after treatment with tamoxifen received three separate daily doses of vorozole (1, 2.5, and 5 mg) each for 1 month in a randomized, double-blind, phase II study. There was significant suppression (P < 0.001) of serum estradiol at all three doses (median reduction, 91, 90, and 89%, respectively). There was a significant trend (P = 0.02) for estradiol to be suppressed below the detection limit of the assay (3 pmol/liter) more frequently with an increasing dose of vorozole; 13, 31, and 40% respectively. Estrone and estrone-sulfate levels were likewise reduced at each dose by 52-55% and 64-69%, respectively. There was no significant effect at any dose on aldosterone, testosterone, androstenedione, 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone, or thyroid-stimulating hormone levels. A small reduction in cortisol was seen at the 5 mg dose, although the relevance is unclear given that 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone levels did not rise. Eight patients (33%) achieved an objective response (2 complete remission, 6 partial remission) with a median response duration of 13 months. Four patients (17%) achieved disease stabilization for more than 6 months. Patients who had responded previously to tamoxifen were more likely to respond to vorozole. There were no significant clinical side effects and the drug was well tolerated. These data suggest that vorozole is a potent and selective oral aromatase inhibitor for use in postmenopausal breast cancer.

ICI 182,780 has shown pure oestrogen antagonism in vitro and in vivo in animals. A total of 17 women with normal menstrual cycles were administered ICI 182,780, 12 mg daily for 7 days in the follicular phase prior to hysterectomy; 11 normal women were used as controls. Of the 17 patients, three (18%) experienced a luteinizing hormone (LH) surge in the treatment group compared with five (45%) in the controls (P = 0.24), and these patients were only included up to the surge. There were no differences in the daily mean plasma LH and follicle stimulating hormone concentrations between the treatment (n = 17) and control (n = 10) groups. The mean plasma oestradiol was higher in the treatment group than controls (P < 0.05) on days 5, 6 and 7. However, there was no increase in endometrial thickness in the treatment group throughout the study. In the control group, endometrial thickness increased during the study and was significantly higher (P < 0.05) on day 7. There was no ultrasonic evidence of ovarian hyperstimulation and no serious adverse events reported. This study shows that treatment for 7 days with ICI 182,780 does not cause ovarian hyperstimulation and has a potent anti-oestrogenic action on the endometrium. We conclude that ICI 182,780 may be a useful compound in the treatment of oestrogen-dependent gynaecological disease.

We have conducted a clinical trial of a novel pure antiestrogen, 7 alpha-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulfinyl)nonyl]estra-1,3,5,(1 0)-triene-3,17 beta-diol (ICI 182780), to assess its tolerance, pharmacokinetics, and short term biological effects in women with primary breast cancer. Fifty-six patients were randomized to either a control group (n = 19), in which they received no preoperative treatment, or a treatment group (n = 37), in which they received daily i.m. injections of ICI 182780 at doses of 6 mg (n = 21) or 18 mg (n = 16) for 7 days prior to primary breast surgery. Serum drug concentrations, gonadotropin levels, and sex hormone-binding globulin levels were measured during the study period by radioimmunoassay. Expression of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors, the estrogen-induced protein pS2, and the cell proliferation-related antigen Ki67 was determined immunocytochemically in pre- and poststudy tumor samples. Treatment with ICI 182780 caused no serious drug-related adverse events and had no effect on serum gonadotropin or sex hormone-binding globulin levels. Minor adverse events occurred in 5 patients receiving the 6-mg dose and 3 patients receiving the 18-mg dose. The serum concentration of ICI 182780 was dose dependent but showed variation between individuals. There was evidence of an approximately 3-fold drug accumulation over the short treatment period but steady state levels were not reached by the end of the 7 days. In patients with ER-positive tumors, treatment with ICI 182780 was associated with significant reductions in the tumor expression of ER (median ER index, 0.72 before versus 0.02 after treatment; P < 0.001), progesterone receptor (median progesterone receptor index, 0.50 before versus 0.01 after treatment; P < 0.05), and Ki67 (median Ki67 labeling index, 3.2 before versus 1.1 after treatment; P < 0.05). Treatment with ICI 182780 also resulted in a significant reduction in pS2 expression (P < 0.05) but this appeared unrelated to tumor ER status. In conclusion, ICI 182780 was well tolerated after short term administration and produced demonstrable antiestrogenic effects in human breast tumors in vivo, without showing evidence of agonist activity. These properties identify ICI 182780 as a candidate agent with which to evaluate whether a pure estrogen antagonist offers any additional benefit in the treatment of human breast cancer over conventional nonsteroidal antiestrogens, typified by tamoxifen, which exhibit variable degrees of agonist activity.

Raised levels of steroid hormones are not expected in postmenopausal women. Therefore, if detected in postmenopausal women with ovarian cancer, they must be assumed to be related to the presence of the tumour and, therefore, may be of use as tumour markers. Serum levels of CA125, progesterone, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, sex hormone binding globulin and oestradiol were measured in 44 postmenopausal women with ovarian cancer, postsurgery and prior to chemotherapy. The relationship between the four hormone levels, CA125, patient age, stage, residual disease after surgery and differentiation were tested using the Spearman and Kendall rank coefficients. A significant inverse association was found between CA125 and progesterone levels, and CA125 and 17-hydroxyprogesterone. A positive association between 17-hydroxyprogesterone and progesterone was also found, and positive correlations between stage and CA125, and residual disease and CA125 were confirmed.

We have performed a phase I study of the effect of a single dose of CGS 20267, an oral nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor, in 12 healthy volunteer postmenopausal women. Each subject received 2 single doses of CGS 20267 (0.1, 0.5, or 2.5 mg) or placebo separated by a washout period of at least 6 weeks. There was statistically significant suppression of serum estrone and estradiol at all three doses of CGS 20267 tested. Serum estrone and estradiol concentrations were maximally suppressed by 76% and 79% from baseline levels, respectively. Urinary excretion of estrone and estradiol was also suppressed, although this did not reach statistical significance. Serum concentrations of aldosterone, cortisol, 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone, androstenedione, testosterone, FSH, LH, and TSH were unaffected by CGS 20267. The drug was well tolerated, with no significant side-effects. This study has shown CGS 20267 to be a potent and specific aromatase inhibitor, and further studies are now needed to assess its clinical efficacy.

Several studies have suggested that patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) have an increased risk of a number of medical conditions related to their oestrogen levels. This study has measured sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) binding capacity, total oestradiol levels and percentage non-protein-bound (NPB) oestradiol and calculated the concentration of NPB oestradiol, in postmenopausal subjects in the following groups; normal controls, early PBC, advanced PBC and advanced PBC who were receiving therapy. Mean SHBG levels were higher in all groups of patients with PBC than in controls. No significant difference was observed in total or biologically active oestradiol between the four groups.

Previous studies have shown that in the breast there are multiple forms of the enzyme oestradiol dehydrogenase (E2DH), responsible for the interconversion of oestrone (E1) to oestradiol (E2). We have now re-examined oestrogen metabolism in the breast cancer cell lines (T47D and MCF-7) and have shown that steroids previously shown to inhibit the conversion of E1 to E2 in normal breast tissue failed to do so when added to growing monolayers of these malignant cells. In contrast to earlier estimates in normal breast tissues, the apparent Km for this conversion in monolayers of these malignant cells is shown here to be considerably lower, at around 50 nM. Cell free studies on these cell lines have revealed the presence of a high affinity (for E1) form of this enzyme of Mw approximately 80 kDa. The ability to detect this enzyme in soluble cell fractions appears to be critically dependent on buffer composition. Normal breast epithelial cells and adipose tissue appear to be devoid of this form of E2DH. As this form of E2DH has the highest affinity for the substrate E1 of all the forms in the breast, it is probable that this 80 kDa enzyme is responsible for the conversion of E1 to E2 in cell monolayers. If the observation holds that the 80 kDa enzyme is absent in the normal tissues, then the possibility arises that this E2DH may be linked with the neoplastic process in some breast tumours containing malignant epithelial cells of a similar type as studied here.

It has been postulated that differences in the levels of circulating hormones may be the explanation for the epidemiological link between per capita dietary fat intake and the incidence of breast cancer. We have investigated this possible relationship in 19 postmenopausal, and 18 premenopausal women who completed a 4-week period on a diet aiming to reduce fat intake to around 20% of total kilocalories. 7-day dietary records revealed a significant decrease in dietary fat intake in both the pre- and postmenopausal groups (from 37.2% of calories from fat to 23.2% and from 37.9 to 24.3%, respectively). There was a minor increase in the level of sex hormone-binding globulin, and a small decrease in prolactin in the postmenopausal group, which were of borderline significance. There were no significant changes in total oestradiol (E2), or non-protein-bound (free) E2 concentrations. In the premenopausal group there were no significant changes in any of the hormone levels investigated.

Several studies have recently reported the percentage of non-protein-bound (NPB) oestradiol (E2) to be higher in patients with breast cancer than in normal controls. Using postmenopausal volunteers, we have examined the fractional binding of E2 and testosterone (T), as well as total E2 and T, sex-hormone binding globulin (SHBG), luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), in normal women, those at risk of developing breast cancer and women with breast cancer at first diagnosis and first recurrence. No significant differences were observed in either the concentration or in the percentage of NPB E2 or T, or in any of the other hormones measured. The validity of our observations were confirmed by expected relationships between E2, T, SHBG and body mass.

The pyridylglutarimide 3-ethyl-3-(4-pyridyl)-piperidine-2,6-dione (PyG) is a novel inhibitor of aromatase that was shown to cause effective suppression of plasma oestradiol levels in postmenopausal patients. In four patients receiving oral doses of PyG (500 mg) twice daily for 3-4 days, oestradiol levels fell to 31.1% +/- 6.3% of baseline values within 48 h and remained suppressed during treatment. Of a further six patients who received oral PyG (1 g) as a single dose, five had quantifiable oestradiol levels. Oestradiol suppression was sustained for 36 h and recovery correlated with a fall of PyG concentrations below a threshold value of ca. 2 micrograms/ml. The pharmacokinetics of PyG were non-linear and, when fitted to the integrated Michaelis-Menten equation, yielded good parameter estimates for Co (21.7 +/- 1.82 micrograms/ml), Km (2.66 +/- 0.68 micrograms/ml) and Vmax (0.86 +/- 0.06 micrograms ml-1 h-1). On subsequent repeated dosing with PyG, both the Km (4.31 +/- 0.48 micrograms/ml) and the Vmax (1.83 +/- 0.13 micrograms ml-1 h-1) values increased and recovery from oestradiol suppression was more rapid, indicating that PyG induces its own metabolism.