Search

Let S 1 , S 2 , … , S k be survival functions of life distributions. They are said to be uniformly stochastically ordered, S 1 ≤ u s o S 2 ≤ u s o ⋯ ≤ u s o S k , if S i / S i + 1 is a survival function for 1 ≤ i ≤ k − 1 . The nonparametric maximum likelihood estimators of the survival functions subject to this ordering constraint are known to be inconsistent in general. Consistent estimators were developed only for the case of k = 2 . In this paper we provide consistent estimators in the k -sample case, with and without censoring. In proving consistency, we needed to develop a new algorithm for isotonic regression that may be of independent interest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The peakedness of a random variable (RV) about a point is defined by . A RV is said to be less peaked about than a RV about , denoted by , if for all , i.e., is stochastically larger than . These generalize the original definitions of Birnbaum (1948) who considered the cases where and were symmetric about and , respectively. Statistical inferences about the distribution functions of continuous and under peakedness ordering in the symmetric case have been treated in the literature. Rojo et al. (2007) provided estimators of the distributions in the general case and analyzed their properties. We show that these estimators could have poor asymptotic properties relative to those of the empiricals. We provide improved estimators of the DFs, show that they are consistent, derive the weak convergence of the estimators, compare them with the empirical estimators, and provide formulas for statistical inferences. An example is also used to illustrate our theoretical results. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: There are many ways to measure the dispersion of a random variable. One such method uses the concept of peakedness. If the random variable is symmetric about a point , then Birnbaum [Z.W. Birnbaum, On random variables with comparable peakedness, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 19 (1948) 76–81] defined the function , as the peakedness of . If two random variables, and , are symmetric about the points and , respectively, then is said to be less peaked than , denoted by , if for all , i.e.,  is stochastically larger than . For normal distributions this is equivalent to variance ordering. Peakedness ordering can be generalized to the case where and are arbitrary points. However, in this paper we study the comparison of dispersions in two continuous random variables, symmetric about their respective medians, using the peakedness concept where normality, and even moment assumptions are not necessary. We provide estimators of the distribution functions under the restriction of symmetry and peakedness ordering, show that they are consistent, derive the weak convergence of the estimators, compare them with the empirical estimators, and provide formulas for statistical inferences. An example is given to illustrate the theoretical results. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

In the competing risks problem an important role is played by the cumulative incidence function (CIF), whose value at time t is the probability of failure by time t for a particular type of failure in the presence of other risks. Its estimation and asymptotic distribution theory have been studied by many. In some cases there are reasons to believe that the CIFs due to two types of failure are order restricted. Several procedures have appeared in the literature for testing for such orders. In this paper we initiate the study of estimation of two CIFs subject to a type of stochastic ordering, both when there are just two causes of failure and when there are more than two causes of failure, treating those other than the two of interest as a censoring mechanism. We do not assume independence of the two types of failure of interest; however, these are assumed to be independent of the other causes in the censored case. Weak convergence results for the estimators have been derived. It is shown that when the order restriction is strict, the asymptotic distributions are the same as those for the empirical estimators without the order restriction. Thus we get the restricted estimators “free of charge”, at least in the asymptotic sense. When the two CIFs are equal, the asymptotic MSE is reduced by using the order restriction. For finite sample sizes simulations seem to indicate that the restricted estimators have uniformly smaller MSEs than the unrestricted ones in all cases. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]