Search

Our prior study reveals that the distension-contraction profiles using high-resolution manometry impedance recordings can distinguish patients with dysphagia symptom but normal esophageal function testing ("functional dysphagia") from control subjects. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of the recording protocol used in our prior studies (10-mL swallows with subjects in the Trendelenburg position) against the standard clinical protocol (5-mL swallows with subjects in the supine position). We used advanced machine learning techniques and robust metrics for classification purposes. Studies were performed on 30 healthy subjects and 30 patients with functional dysphagia. A custom-built software was used to extract the relevant distension-contraction features of esophageal peristalsis. Ensemble methods, i.e., gradient boost, support vector machines (SVMs), and logit boost, were used as the primary machine learning algorithms. Although the individual contraction features were marginally different between the two groups, the distension features of peristalsis were significantly different. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve values for the standard recording protocol and the distension features ranged from 0.74 to 0.82; they were significantly better for the protocol used in our prior studies, ranging from 0.81 to 0.91. The ROC curve values using three machine learning algorithms were far superior for the distension than the contraction features of esophageal peristalsis, revealing a value of 0.95 for the SVM algorithm. Current patient classification for esophageal motility disorders, based on the contraction phase of peristalsis, ignores a large number of patients who have an abnormality in the distension phase of peristalsis. Distension-contraction plots should be the standard for assessing esophageal peristalsis in clinical practice. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our findings underscore the superiority of distension features over contraction metrics in diagnosing esophageal dysfunctions. By leveraging state-of-the-art machine learning techniques, our study highlights the diagnostic potential of distension-contraction plots of peristalsis. Implementation of these plots could significantly enhance the accuracy of identifying patients with esophageal motor disorders, advocating for their adoption as the standard in clinical practice.

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, and more than 80% of PD patients will develop oropharyngeal dysphagia. Despite its striated histology, proximity to airway, and potential negative impact of its dysfunction on bolus transport and airway safety, the contractile function of the striated esophagus in PD patients has not been systematically studied., Methods: Using our repository of clinical manometry and the Milwaukee ManoBank, we analyzed high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies of 20 PD patients, mean age 69.1 (range 38-87 years); 30 non-PD patients with dysphagia, mean age 64.0 (44-86 years); and 32 healthy volunteers, mean age 65.3 (39-86 years). Patients with abnormal findings based on Chicago Classification 4.0 were identified. Repeat analysis was performed in 20% of the manometric tracings by a different investigator with inter-rater concordance between 0.91 and 0.99., Key Results: The striated esophageal contractile integral in PD patients was significantly lower than that in non-PD dysphagic patients and healthy controls (p = 0.03 and <0.01, respectively). This significant difference persisted after excluding patients with concurrent Chicago Classification motility disorders (p = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). In both analyses, the distal esophageal contractile integral did not show any significant difference between groups (p = 0.58 and 0.93, respectively)., Conclusions & Inferences: PD is associated with a significant decrease in striated esophagus contractility compared to non-PD and healthy controls. This finding may play a pathophysiologic role in development of dysphagia in this patient population., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Reason for dysphagia in a significant number of patients remains unclear even after a thorough workup. Each swallow induces esophageal distension followed by contraction of the esophagus, both of which move sequentially along the esophagus. Manometry technique and current system of classifying esophageal motility disorders (Chicago Classification) is based on the analysis of the contraction phase of peristalsis., Goal: Whether patients with unexplained dysphagia have abnormalities in the distension phase of esophageal peristalsis is not known., Methods: Using Multiple Intraluminal esophageal impedance recordings, which allow determination of the luminal cross-sectional area during peristalsis, we studied patients with nutcracker esophagus (NC), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO), and functional dysphagia (FD)., Results: Distension contraction plots revealed that swallowed bolus travels significantly faster through the esophagus in all patient groups as compared to normals. The luminal cross-sectional area (amplitude of distension), and the area under the curve of distension were significantly smaller in patients with NC, EGJOO, and FD as compared to normals. Bolus traverses the esophagus in the shape of an "American Football" in normal subjects. On the other hand, in patients the bolus flow was fragmented. ROC curves revealed that bolus flow abnormalities during peristalsis are a sensitive and specific marker of dysphagia., Conclusion: Our findings reveal abnormality in the distension phase of peristalsis (a narrow lumen esophagus) in patients with dysphagia. We propose that the esophageal contraction forcing the swallowed bolus through a narrow lumen esophagus is the cause of dysphagia sensation in patients with normal contraction phase of peristalsis., Competing Interests: Dr Zifan and Dr Mittal have copyright protection for the computer software (Dplots). However, this does not alter in any way our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Background and Aims: This study aimed to systematically evaluate a classification scheme of secondary peristalsis using functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) panometry through comparison with primary peristalsis on high-resolution manometry (HRM)., Methods: 706 adult patients that completed FLIP and HRM for primary esophageal motility evaluation and 35 asymptomatic volunteers ("controls") were included. Secondary peristalsis, that is, contractile responses (CRs), was classified on FLIP panometry by the presence and pattern of contractility as normal (NCR), borderline (BCR), impaired/disordered (IDCR), absent (ACR), or spastic-reactive (SRCR). Primary peristalsis on HRM was assessed according to the Chicago Classification., Results: All 35 of the controls had antegrade contractions on FLIP panometry with either NCR (89%) or BCR (11%). The average percentages of normal swallows on HRM varied across contractile response patterns from 84% in NCR, 68% in BCR, 39% in IDCR, to 11% in ACR, as did the percentage of failed swallows on HRM: 4% in NCR, 12% in BCR, 36% in IDCR, and 79% in ACR. SRCR on FLIP panometry was observed in 18/57 (32%) patients with type III achalasia, 4/15 (27%) with distal esophageal spasm, and 7/15 (47%) with hypercontractile esophagus on HRM., Conclusions: The FLIP panometry contractile response patterns reflect a pathophysiologic transition from normal to abnormal esophageal peristaltic function with shared features with primary peristaltic function/dysfunction on HRM. Thus, these patterns of the contractile response to distension can facilitate the evaluation of esophageal motility using FLIP panometry., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Esophageal hypomotility disorders manifest with abnormal esophageal body contraction vigor, breaks in peristaltic integrity, or failure of peristalsis in the context of normal lower esophageal sphincter relaxation on esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM). The Chicago Classification version 4.0 recognizes two hypomotility disorders, ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and absent contractility, while fragmented peristalsis has been incorporated into the IEM definition. Updated criteria for ineffective swallows consist of weak esophageal body contraction vigor measured using distal contractile integral (DCI, 100-450 mmHg·cm·s), transition zone defects >5 cm measured using a 20 mmHg isobaric contour, or failure of peristalsis (DCI < 100 mmHg·cm·s). More than 70% ineffective swallows and/or ≥50% failed swallows are required for a conclusive diagnosis of IEM. When the diagnosis is inconclusive (50%-70% ineffective swallows), supplementary evidence from multiple rapid swallows (absence of contraction reserve), barium radiography (abnormal bolus clearance), or HRM with impedance (abnormal bolus clearance) could support a diagnosis of IEM. Absent contractility requires 100% failed peristalsis, consistent with previous versions of the classification. Consideration needs to be given for the possibility of achalasia in absent contractility with dysphagia despite normal IRP, and alternate complementary tests (including timed upright barium esophagram and functional lumen imaging probe) are recommended to confirm or refute the presence of achalasia. Future research to quantify esophageal bolus retention on stationary HRM with impedance and to understand contraction vigor thresholds that predict bolus clearance will provide further refinement to diagnostic criteria for esophageal hypomotility disorders in future iterations of the Chicago Classification., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Esophageal hypercontractility (EHC) is considered a major esophageal motor disorder of unclear etiology. Different mechanisms have been proposed, including an imbalance in inhibitory and excitatory esophageal innervation. We hypothesized that patients with EHC suffer from cholinergic hyperactivity., Aim: To interrogate the excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission in EHC by assessing the esophageal motor response to atropine (ATR) and cholecystokinin (CCK), respectively, in EHC patients., Method: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent high-resolution manometry (HRM) with pharmacologic challenge in a tertiary referral center between 2007 and 2017. We identified 49 EHC patients who were categorized based on frequency of hypercontractile peristaltic sequence into "frequent" and "infrequent" and motility diagnosis groups. Deglutitive pressure metrics and esophageal motor responses to ATR (12 mcg/kg iv) and CCK (40 ng/kg iv) were analyzed across groups., Results: Atropine abolished hypercontractility across all groups studied, converting nearly half of patients to a motor pattern of ineffective esophageal motility. Abnormal CCK responses primarily occurred in the patient groups with concomitant outflow obstruction., Conclusions: Hypercontractility is cholinergically mediated in all esophageal motor disorders. Most patients with isolated EHC appear to have excessive cholinergic drive, rather than loss of inhibitory innervation, and might be candidates for treatment with anticholinergic agents., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Several patients in gastroenterology practice present with esophageal symptoms, and in case of normal endoscopy with biopsies, high-resolution manometry (HRM) is often the next step. Our aim was to develop a European consensus on the clinical application of esophageal HRM, to offer the clinician guidance in selecting patients for HRM and using its results to optimize clinical outcome., Methods: A Delphi consensus was initiated with 38 multidisciplinary experts from 16 European countries who conducted a literature summary and voting process on 71 statements. Quality of evidence was evaluated using grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was reached for 33 statements., Results: The process generated guidance on when to consider esophageal HRM, how to perform it, and how to generate the report. The Delphi process also identified several areas of uncertainty, such as the choice of catheters, the duration of fasting and the position in which HRM is performed, but recommended to perform at least 10 5-ml swallows in supine position for each study. Postprandial combined HRM impedance is considered useful for diagnosing rumination. There is a large lack of consensus on treatment implications of HRM findings, which is probably the single area requiring future targeted research., Conclusions and Inferences: A multinational and multidisciplinary group of European experts summarized the current state of consensus on technical aspects, indications, performance, analysis, diagnosis, and therapeutic implications of esophageal HRM., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Patients with esophageal symptoms often remain with an uncertain diagnosis after high-resolution manometry., Aim: To determine the added value of concomitant pressure and symptom analysis in response to a rapid drink challenge (RDC)., Methods: In consecutive patients referred for esophageal manometry, a RDC consisting in free drinking of 200 ml of water as quick as possible was performed after the standard single water swallows manometry. Both pressure patterns and usual symptoms induced by the RDC were analyzed., Results: A total of 1319 patients were included, (64.7% women, mean age 58.2 years, range 11-90). There were significant differences in pressure responses between patients with obstructive disorders, major hypercontractile disorders, esophageal hypomotility disorders and normal motility. The RDC provoked usual symptoms in 388 (29.4%) patients, associated with hyperpressive and obstructive patterns in 14.0% and 16.6%, respectively. Reproduction of dysphagia and regurgitation (not pain) was significantly associated with abnormal pressure responses during the RDC (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). The RDC elicited both abnormal pressure patterns and symptoms in 6.2%, 1.6%, and 20.8% of patients with normal motility, ineffective esophageal motility, and esophago-gastric junction outflow obstruction, respectively., Conclusion: Concomitant evaluation of symptoms and pressure responses to a RDC may increase the specificity of esophageal motor testing in patients with inconclusive diagnosis or normal esophageal motility., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) is the updated classification scheme for esophageal motility disorders using metrics from high-resolution manometry (HRM). A key feature of CCv.4.0 is the more rigorous and expansive protocol that incorporates single wet swallows acquired in different positions (supine, upright) and provocative testing, including multiple rapid swallows and rapid drink challenge. Additionally, solid bolus swallows, solid test meal, and/or pharmacologic provocation can be used to identify clinically relevant motility disorders and other conditions (eg, rumination) that occur during and after meals. The acquisition and analysis for performing these tests and the evidence supporting their inclusion in the Chicago Classification protocol is detailed in this technical review. Provocative tests are designed to increase the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of HRM studies for disorders of esophageal motility. These changes attempt to minimize ambiguity in prior iterations of Chicago Classification, decrease the proportion of HRM studies that deliver inconclusive diagnoses and increase the number of patients with a clinically relevant diagnosis that can direct effective therapy. Another aim in establishing a standard manometry protocol for motility laboratories around the world is to facilitate procedural consistency, improve diagnostic reliability, and promote collaborative research., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Esophageal dysphagia is a common symptom in adults. Fluoroscopic contrast studies, endoscopy, and esophageal manometry have been used in the diagnosis of esophageal dysphagia for many years. The diagnostic yield has been improved with new test protocols that highlight abnormal bolus transit in the esophagus and outflow obstruction, as well as new high-definition and high-resolution technical advances in equipment. Functional luminal impedance planimetry and the addition of impedance to high-resolution esophageal manometry have also allowed the assessment of new parameters to better understand esophageal structure and function. In this concise review, we describe the role and utility of various diagnostic modalities in the assessment of patients with esophageal dysphagia., (© 2020 New York Academy of Sciences.)

Introduction: Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a minor motor disorder with potential reflux implications. Contraction reserve, manifested as augmentation of esophageal body contraction after multiple rapid swallows (MRS), may affect esophageal acid exposure time (AET) in IEM., Methods: Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) and ambulatory reflux monitoring studies were reviewed over 2 years to identify patients with normal HRM, IEM (≥50% ineffective swallows), and absent contractility (100% failed swallows). Single swallows and MRS were analyzed using HRM software tools (distal contractile integral, DCI) to determine contraction reserve (mean MRS DCI to mean single swallow DCI ratio >1). Univariate analysis and multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine motor predictors of abnormal AET in the context of contraction reserve., Results: Of 191 eligible patients, 57.1% had normal HRM, 37.2% had IEM, and 5.8% had absent contractility. Contraction reserve had no affect on AET in normal HRM. Nonsevere IEM (5-7 ineffective swallows) demonstrated significantly lower proportions with abnormal AET in the presence of contraction reserve (30.4%) compared with severe IEM (8-10 ineffective swallows) (75.0%, P = 0.03). Abnormal AET proportions in nonsevere IEM with contraction reserve (32.7%) resembled normal HRM (33.0%, P = 0.96), whereas that in severe IEM with (46.2%) or without contraction reserve (50.0%) resembled absent contractility (54.5%, P ≥ 0.6). Multivariable analysis demonstrated contraction reserve to be an independent predictor of lower upright AET in nonsevere (odds ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.88) but not severe IEM., Discussion: Contraction reserve affects esophageal reflux burden in nonsevere IEM. Segregating IEM into severe and nonsevere cohorts has clinical value.

Hypercontractile esophagus (HE), also known as jackhammer esophagus, is an esophageal motility disorder. Nowadays, high-resolution manometry (HRM) is used to diagnose the disorder. According to the latest iteration of the Chicago classification, HE is present when at least 2 out 10 liquid swallow-induced peristaltic waves have an abnormally high Distal Contractile Integral. In the era of conventional manometry, a similar condition, referred to as nutcracker esophagus, was diagnosed when the peristaltic contractions had an abnormally high mean amplitude. Although the HRM diagnosis of HE is relatively straight-forward, effective management of the disorder is challenging as the correlation with symptoms is variable and treatment effects are dubious. In this mini-review, we discuss the most troublesome uncertainties that still surround HE, in the light of new data on etiology and epidemiology published in this issue of Neurogastroenterology and Motility., (© 2020 The Authors. Neurogastroenterology & Motility published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

High-resolution manometry revolutionized the assessment of esophageal motility disorders and upgraded the classification through the Chicago Classification. A known disadvantage of standard HRM, however, is the inability to record esophageal motility function for an extended time interval; therefore, it represents only a more snapshot view of esophageal motor function. In contrast, ambulatory esophageal manometry measures esophageal motility over a prolonged period and detects motor activity during the entire circadian cycle. Furthermore, ambulatory manometry has the ability to measure temporal correlations between symptoms and motor events. This article aimed to review the clinical implications of ambulatory esophageal manometry for various symptoms, covering literature on the manometry catheter, interpretation of findings, and relevance in clinical practice specific to the evaluation of non-cardiac chest pain, chronic cough, and rumination syndrome., (© 2020 The Authors. Neurogastroenterology & Motility published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Distal contractile integral (DCI) is influenced by factors other than esophageal smooth muscle contractility, such as intrabolus pressure and vascular and respiratory movements' artifacts. We aimed to determine the size of the contribution of pressures generated by vascular compression on the esophagus to the DCI measured in HRM recordings in symptomatic patients., Methods: HRM manometry recordings obtained from 383 subjects referred to the GI motility laboratory at a tertiary center (2012-2016) were evaluated by visual inspection for evidence of strong vascular compression (SVC) of the esophagus. Clinical, demographic, manometric, and serologic data for Chagas disease were obtained. Subjects were classified, respectively, as asymptomatics (ASYM) or symptomatics (SYMP). DCI and SVC-DCI were measured, and the SVC-DCI/DCI ratio was expressed as a percentage and the difference between DCI and SVC-DCI (neat-DCI) was calculated. DCI, SVC-DCI, SVC-DCI/DCI % and neat-DCI from SYMP and ASYM were compared., Results: SVC was conspicuous in 42 of 383 subjects (11%). In 33 subjects, SVC was detected only in supine position. SVC was localized in middle esophagus in 21 subjects (50%), in distal esophagus in 12 subjects (29%) and in both regions in 9 subjects (21%). In 9 subjects, SVC vanished from the swallowing window analysis (21%)., Conclusions: SVC is a common finding in esophageal HRM study, particularly in the supine position. Occasionally, its contribution to DCI value is sufficiently great to masquerade esophageal hypocontractility. Different manometric protocols may be required in patients with SVC.

Introduction: Competency-based medical education (CBME) for interpretation of esophageal manometry is lacking; therefore, motility experts and instructional designers developed the esophageal manometry competency (EMC) program: a personalized, adaptive learning program for interpretation of esophageal manometry. The aim of this study was to implement EMC among Gastroenterology (GI) trainees and assess the impact of EMC on competency in manometry interpretation., Methods: GI fellows across 14 fellowship programs were invited to complete EMC from February 2018 to October 2018. EMC includes an introductory video, baseline assessment of manometry interpretation, individualized learning pathways, and final assessment of manometry interpretation. The primary outcome was competency for interpretation in 7 individual skill sets., Results: Forty-four GI trainees completed EMC. Participants completed 30 cases, each including 7 skill sets. At baseline, 4 (9%) participants achieved competency for all 7 skills compared with 24 (55%) at final assessment (P < 0.001). Competency in individual skills increased from a median of 4 skills at baseline to 7 at final assessment (P < 0.001). The greatest increase in skill competency was for diagnosis (Baseline: 11% vs Final: 68%; P < 0.001). Accuracy improved for distinguishing between 5 diagnostic groups and was highest for the Outflow obstructive motility disorder (Baseline: 49% vs Final: 76%; P < 0.001) and Normal motor function (50% vs 80%; P < 0.001)., Discussion: This prospective multicenter implementation study highlights that an adaptive web-based training platform is an effective tool to promote CBME. EMC completion was associated with significant improvement in identifying clinically relevant diagnoses, providing a model for integrating CBME into subspecialized areas of training.

Background: Proximal esophageal striated muscle contractility may be abnormal in patients with esophageal symptoms, but is not assessed in the Chicago Classification (CC) v3.0. We aimed to (a) determine the prevalence of abnormal proximal esophageal contractility in patients with esophageal symptoms; (b) compare proximal esophageal contractility in patients with different esophageal motility disorders; (c) assess the association of abnormal proximal esophageal contractility with esophageal symptoms., Methods: Patients undergoing high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) from 7/2019 to 11/2019 and healthy volunteers (HVs) were studied. Measurements of the proximal esophageal segment included the vigor of contractility of the proximal esophagus (proximal contractile integral/PCI). Patients rated gastrointestinal symptoms' severity., Key Results: HREM was performed on 221 patients (63.8% females, mean age 57.1 ± 1.1 years) and 19 HVs. Mean PCI in HVs was 299.5 ± 30.6 (95% CI 32.3-566.7 mm Hg . s . cm). Of all patients, 61 (27.6%) had abnormal PCI. HVs and patients with different esophageal motility disorders had significantly different PCI (P < .01). Type 1 achalasia patients had weaker PCI than patients with absent contractility (P = .02). Patients with abnormal PCI had more severe dysphagia (P = .02), nausea (P = .03), vomiting (P = .03), and lower bolus clearance (P < .01) than patients with normal PCI., Conclusions and Inferences: Abnormal PCI was found in a fourth of patients with esophageal symptoms. PCI may be useful to distinguish some esophageal motility disorders. Patients with abnormal PCI had a higher severity of some upper gastrointestinal symptoms than patients with normal PCI. Assessing the proximal esophageal segment on HREM may be useful in characterizing patients with esophageal symptoms., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

High-resolution manometry evaluates esophageal motor function using 10 supine water swallows. Superimposing impedance over high-resolution manometry pressure topography assesses the relationship between contraction and bolus propulsion and identifies inadequate clearance. Ancillary techniques and maneuvers augment the standard supine high-resolution manometry evaluation by challenging peristaltic function. Increasing bolus volume (rapid drink challenge) and altering bolus consistency (standardized test meal, solid swallows) enhance identification of esophageal outflow obstruction syndromes. Physiologic maneuvers (multiple rapid swallows, abdominal compression) address the ability of the esophageal smooth muscle to augment contraction vigor. Pharmacologic challenge is less commonly used clinically, and elucidates pathophysiology of esophageal motor disorders., Competing Interests: Disclosure C.P. Gyawali has received honoraria for consulting from Medtronic, Diversatek, Torax, Ironwood, and Quintiles, and is on the speaker’s bureau for Medtronic and Diversatek. B.D. Rogers has no conflicts of interest to disclose. No conflicts of interest exist., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The definition and relevance of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) remains debated. Our aim was to determine motility patterns and symptoms associated with IEM defined as impaired bolus clearance., Methods: To define altered bolus clearance, normal range of swallows with complete bolus transit (CBT) on high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) was determined in 44 asymptomatic controls. The results were then applied to a cohort of 81 patients with esophageal symptoms to determine the motility patterns which best predicted altered bolus clearance. Subsequently, in a cohort of 281 consecutive patients the identified motility patterns were compared with patients' customary symptoms., Key Results: In asymptomatic controls, the normal range of swallows with CBT was 50%-100%. In patients, altered bolus transit (<50% CBT) was only associated with 30% or more failed contractions (P < .001). Neither weak peristalsis nor absence of contraction reserve (CR) was associated with altered bolus clearance. The patterns which best predicted altered bolus clearance were failed contractions ≥30% (specificity 88.2% and sensitivity of 84.6%), and ≥70% ineffective (failed + weak) contractions (sensitivity 84.6% and specificity 80.9%). No motility pattern was correlated to symptom scores., Conclusions and Inferences: Based on bolus clearance assessed by HRIM, ≥30% failed contractions and ≥70% ineffective contractions have the best sensitivity and specificity to predict altered bolus clearance. Weak contractions and absence of CR are not relevant with respect to bolus clearance., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Absent esophageal contractility (AC) is distinguished from type 1 achalasia (ACH1) during high-resolution manometry (HRM) on the basis of normal or elevated deglutitive integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) values. However, IRP measurements are subject to pressure recording error. We hypothesized that distinctive responses to pharmacologic provocation using amyl nitrite (AN) and cholecystokinin (CCK) could reliably distinguish AC patients from those with ACH1., Aim: To compare esophageal response with AN and CCK in a well-defined cohort of ACH1 and AC patients., Method: All available clinical, radiographic, endoscopic, and manometric information in 34 patients with aperistalsis was reviewed to determine the final diagnosis of ACH1 and AC. The differences in response to provocative challenges with the rapid drink challenge (RDC) test and administration of AN and CCK were compared between these two groups., Results: Eighteen patients were diagnosed with ACH1 and sixteen with AC. While IRP values were significantly higher in ACH1, the standard criterion value misclassified four AC patients as having ACH1 and five ACH1 patients as having AC. IRP values on the RDC did not accurately segregate AC from ACH1, but we were able to identify AN and CCK esophageal motor response criteria that allowed correct classification of ACH1 and AC patients., Conclusions: Nearly a quarter of AC and ACH1 patients may be misdiagnosed based on manometric IRP criteria alone. Differences in the esophageal motor responses to AN and CCK have the potential to facilitate the correct diagnosis in these challenging patients., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose of Review: Functional lumen impedance (FLIP) technology has become commercially available to assess structural and motor abnormalities of the esophagus. Increasing numbers of papers have described novel findings with this technology. This review examines the validity of the FLIP technique, how it compares with existing diagnostic modalities, and evidence to date on diagnostic accuracy., Recent Findings: FLIP studies require deep sedation at the time of endoscopy to complete. They assess a simulated state of esophageal obstruction in only a distal part of the esophagus rather than deglutitive motor function of the entire esophagus. The available normative dataset is small and not matched to the older age of patients typically being evaluated. The test-retest agreement in health and disease is unknown, as is the operator dependence on performing and interpreting findings. Studies to date have largely excluded patients with structural disorders, which FLIP cannot reliably distinguish from motor disorders. FLIP is an expensive technology that has been made clinically available without its true utility being established. For FLIP to be deemed a device ready for widespread clinical use, additional studies on validity, diagnostic accuracy, and outcomes need to be performed. Prospective clinical studies need to include all patients and assess the incremental cost-effectiveness of FLIP over more innovative use of existing technology, such as high-resolution manometry with provocative challenges.

Horizontal pressure bands on high-resolution esophageal manometry with impedance (HREMI) tracings are often seen and thought to be due to cardiovascular structures compressing the esophagus. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and location of vascular pressure bands on HREMI studies and correlate these pressure bands to bolus clearance. HREMI studies in supine and upright positions from patients and normal volunteers were reviewed. Pressure bands were defined as bands of horizontal pressure greater than the 20 mmHg isobaric contour. Each swallow was reviewed with impedance to determine if bolus transit was impaired by the band. 38.6% of 251 patients and 36.4% of 11 normal controls had a pressure band present. There were a greater number of bands in supine versus upright position (patients: 130 vs. 25, P < 0.001 and controls: 6 vs. 1). Patients with pressure bands had similar demographics (age, gender, BMI) compared to those without. Average distal contractile integral of bands was greater in supine compared to upright (133 ± 201 vs. 60 ± 148 mmHg cm s, P < 0.05). Bands were commonly located clustered at 46 and 72% of esophageal length. Bolus transit was impaired by bands in 20.4% of supine and 14.0% of upright swallows. Vascular pressure bands can have a prominent appearance on HREMI studies, present in, being more prevalent and having greater pressure in the supine than the upright position. These vascular bands, when present, may impair esophageal transit., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Although High resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) is the gold standard to assess esophageal motility, little is known about the stability of the manometric diagnosis over time and its implications for management. To assess the stability and usefulness of repeat HRM in patients presenting with esophageal symptoms over time we performed this retrospective study of patients with esophageal symptoms. Medical records, questionnaires, and HRM tracing were independently reviewed using the Chicago classification. The primary objective was to assess the stability of the manometric diagnosis over time; secondary objective was its change (positive or negative). At least one repeat study was performed in 86 patients (36% women, ages 20-86, with mild to moderate symptoms), while 26 had a third procedure. Mean intervals between studies were 15 ± 1.6 months (for baseline v. first study) and 13 ± 0.8 months (for second to third study). Of the 27 patients initially with a normal study, 11 changed (five had esophago-gastric junction outflow obstruction [EGJOO], two diffuse esophageal spasm [DES], one jackhammer esophagus [JE], and three ineffective esophageal motility [IEM] [41% change]). Of the 24 patients with initial EGJOO, only nine retained it (65.2% change). Of nine patients with initial DES, four changed (44.4% change). Similarly, different diagnosis was seen in 7 of 24 initial IEM patients (22.7% change). Only one patient had achalasia initially and this remained stable. Additional changes were noted on a third HRM. Fluidity in the HRM diagnosis over time questions its validity at any timepoint and raises doubts about the need for intervention., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Systemic sclerosis (SSC) is an autoimmune disorder that affects several organs of unknown etiology, characterized by vascular damage and fibrosis of the skin and organs. Among the organs involved are the esophagus and the lung., Objectives: To relate the profile of changes in esophageal electromanometry (EM), the profile of skin involvement, interstitial pneumopathy (ILD), and esophageal symptoms in SSC patients., Methods: This is an observational, cross-sectional study carried out at the SSC outpatient clinic of the Hospital de Clínicas of the Federal University of Uberlândia. After approval by the Ethics Committee and signed the terms of consent, 50 patients were initially enrolled, from 04/12/2014 to 06/25/2015. They were submitted to the usual investigations according to the clinical picture. The statistical analysis was descriptive in percentage, means, and standard deviation. The Chi-square test was used to evaluate the relationship between EM, high-resolution tomography, and esophageal symptoms., Results: 91.9% of the patients had some manometric alterations. 37.8% had involvement of the esophageal body and lower esophageal sphincter. 37.8% had ILD. 24.3% presented the diffuse form of SSC. No association was found between manometric changes and clinical manifestations (cutaneous, pulmonary, and gastrointestinal symptoms)., Conclusion: The present study confirms that esophageal motility alterations detected by EM are frequent in SSC patients, but may not be related to cutaneous extension involvement, the presence of ILD, or the gastrointestinal complaints of patients.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare demographics, symptoms, prior interventions, operation, and outcomes of patients who underwent Heller myotomy for esophageal motility disorders and epiphrenic diverticulectomy with Heller myotomy., Methods: We identified all patients who underwent Heller myotomy for esophageal motility disorders with and without esophageal diverticulectomy over an 80-month period. Primary data points included patient demographics, presenting symptoms, prior intervention, high-resolution manometry, surgery performed with rate of laparoscopic, conversion to open, and open procedures; postoperative complications, and symptom resolution., Results: Over the study period, 308 Heller esophagomyotomy operations were performed on 301 patients. Of these, 277 cases were without epiphrenic diverticula and 31 included diverticula. One patient with an asymptomatic epiphrenic diverticulum did not undergo surgery was included, for a total of 32 diverticula patients. Six patients in the non-diverticula group and 1 in the diverticula group required a second operation for recurrent symptoms or residual diverticulum. The diverticula group was significantly older, had different manometry findings, required more open operations, and had longer length of stay. The diverticula group had a lower frequency of patients with prior interventions, but similar postoperative leaks, higher overall postoperative complications, and no difference in reported symptomatic improvement., Conclusions: Esophageal diverticula patients have a unique profile compare to patients with non-diverticula motility disorders. Operations are more complex, with increased complication rate and a longer length of stay. In spite of this, there is no statistically significant difference in symptomatic outcomes between the groups., (© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Purpose of Review: Esophageal peristalsis is a highly sophisticated function that involves the coordinated contraction and relaxation of striated and smooth muscles in a cephalocaudal fashion, under the control of central and peripheral neuronal mechanisms and a number of neurotransmitters. Esophageal peristalsis is determined by the balance of the intrinsic excitatory cholinergic, inhibitory nitrergic and post-inhibitory rebound excitatory output to the esophageal musculature., Recent Findings: Dissociation of the longitudinal and circular muscle contractions characterizes different major esophageal disorders and leads to esophageal symptoms. Provocative testing during esophageal high-resolution manometry is commonly employed to assess esophageal body peristaltic reserve and underpin clinical diagnosis. Herein, we summarize the main factors that determine esophageal peristalsis and examine their role in major and minor esophageal motility disorders and eosinophilic esophagitis.

Background: The implementation of high-resolution manometry (HRM) and the Lyon Consensus statement facilitate evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease and motility disorders in morbidly obese patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate prevalence and phenotype of (borderline) GERD and esophageal motility disorders in this population., Methods: Consecutive morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m 2 ) patients were offered evaluation by means of HRM, ambulatory 24-h pH impedance monitoring, endoscopy, and a clinical examination at our tertiary academic center. Data were collected prospectively., Results: Out of 448 eligible individuals, 147 patients (females = 75, 51%) with a median age of 41.6 (33.4; 52.3) years and a BMI of 44 (40.9; 49.4) kg/m 2 were included during the study period. The Chicago Classification revealed motility disorders in 50 (34%) patients, dominated by outflow obstruction (18.4%, n = 27) and a novel disorder (7.5%, n = 11), nicknamed jackhammer esophagus (JE). According to the Lyon Consensus, 52 (35.4%) patients had evidence of true GERD, whereas borderline GERD was noted in another 60 (40.8%). Hypersensitive esophagus was observed in 6.8% (n = 10). Sensitivity and specificity of symptoms for GERD were 53.8% and 68.4%, respectively., Conclusions: The current gold standard of assessment revealed that the prevalence of esophageal motility disorders and (borderline) GERD is high in the morbidly obese population. Further longitudinal data are needed to delineate the natural course of novel motility disorders like JE in obesity and to identify risk factors for adverse outcomes following bariatric surgery.

Background: Multiple rapid swallows (MRS) during HREM assess post-deglutitive inhibition, LES relaxation, and subsequent esophageal contraction., Aims: (1) To determine the relationship between MRS and single-swallow (SS) responses and (2) to determine if MRS provides information for symptomatic patients., Methods: Healthy volunteers (HVs) and patients underwent HREM [30-s landmark, ten 5-mL SS, MRS (5 consecutive 2-mL swallows every 2-3 s)] and were analyzed with ManoView software version 3 with CC version 3.0., Results: In 20 HVs, MRS response consisted of: (1) reduction in GEJ pressure; (2) absence of esophageal contractile activity during MRS; and (3) post-MRS peristaltic contraction greater than SS contractions. In 20 HVs and 403 patients, MRS IRP correlated with SS IRP (r = 0.65; p < 0.0001) and post-MRS contraction DCI correlated with SS DCI (r = 0.76; p < 0.0001). Abnormally elevated MRS IRP was seen in 68% type 2 achalasia, 50% type 3 achalasia, 47% EGJOO, and 9% jackhammer. Increased MRS DCI was seen in 53% type 2 achalasia, 92% type 3 achalasia, 10% EGJOO, 22% jackhammer, and 18% DES. Increased DCI post-MRS was seen in 38% patients with jackhammer, 8% type 3 achalasia, 12% EGJOO, and 9% DES. 14 out of 143 (10%) patients with normal or indeterminate results on SS analysis had at least one abnormality on MRS., Conclusions: MRS IRP correlated with SS IRP, and post-MRS DCI correlated with SS DCI. Patients with defined CC disorders have abnormalities on MRS. There were MRS abnormalities in some patients with normal SS studies, most notably suggesting impaired LES relaxation and/or spastic esophageal motility. MRS may complement the baseline SS study analysis.

Esophageal high resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for assessment of esophageal motor disorders, but motor responses to the standard 5 mL water swallow protocol may not provide precision in defining minor motor disorders. Provocative maneuvers, particularly multiple rapid swallows (MRS), have been used to assess deglutitive inhibition during the repetitive swallows, and the contractile response following the final swallow of the sequence. The augmentation of esophageal smooth muscle contraction following MRS is termed contraction reserve. This is determined as the ratio between esophageal body contraction vigor (distal contractile integral, DCI) following MRS to the mean DCI after single swallows, which is ≥1 in the presence of contraction reserve. Reliable assessment of contraction reserve requires the performance of 3 MRS maneuvers during HRM. Absence of contraction reserve is associated with a higher likelihood of late postfundoplication dysphagia and may correlate with higher esophageal reflux burden on ambulatory reflux monitoring. Esophageal motor responses to abdominal compression, functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) balloon distension, and pharmacologic testing (using edrophonium and cisapride) may correlate with contraction reserve. Other provocative tests useful during HRM include rapid drink challenge, solid and viscous swallows, and standardized test meals, which are more useful in evaluation of esophageal outflow obstruction and dysphagia syndromes than in identification of contraction reserve. Provocative maneuvers have been recommended as part of routine HRM protocols, and while useful clinical information can be gleaned from these maneuvers, further research is necessary to determine the precise role of provocative testing in clinical esophagology.

Goals: The aim of our study was to characterize jackhammer esophagus symptoms and their relationship with the distal contractile integral (DCI) and bolus transit., Background: Jackhammer esophagus is defined by the Chicago Classification version 3.0. This diagnosis is relatively new, with the most current definition being established in 2014. The forerunners of this diagnosis, nutcracker (or hypercontractile) esophagus, have been associated with noncardiac chest pain (NCCP)., Study: A retrospective chart review was performed of motility studies from 2011 to 2016. Studies with a diagnosis of jackhammer esophagus, hypercontractile esophagus, nutcracker, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, or hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter were reread using Chicago Classification version 3.0, and were included if they met criteria for jackhammer esophagus. Unpaired t-tests were used for analysis (P≤0.05)., Results: In total, 142 studies were identified with the above diagnoses. After excluding 84 studies, 58 remained for analysis and 17 were found to have jackhammer esophagus (29%). The mean age was 54 (28 to 75), 5 (29%) were males and 12 (71%) were females. The primary indications were NCCP (5), dysphagia (8), and other causes (4) (cough, heartburn, or regurgitation). The mean DCIs were 17,245 mm Hg×s×cm (NCCP), 14,669 mm Hg×s×cm (dysphagia), and 11,264 mm Hg×s×cm (other causes). The mean DCIs were compared: NCCP versus dysphagia (P=0.41), and NCCP versus other causes (P=0.05). Fifteen (88%) had normal bolus transit for both liquid and viscous swallows., Conclusions: In our small sample size, dysphagia was frequently the presenting symptom followed by NCCP. Those with NCCP have a trend toward a higher DCI. Bolus transit appeared to be normal in this patient population. More data are needed to further elucidate the genesis of symptoms and how they relate to the degree of contractility.

Jackhammer esophagus (JE) is a hypercontractile disorder, the pathogenesis of which is incompletely understood. Multiple rapid swallows (MRS) and rapid drink challenge (RDC) are complementary tests used during high-resolution manometry (HRM) that evaluate inhibitory and excitatory neuromuscular function and latent obstruction, respectively. Our aim was to evaluate esophageal pathophysiology using MRS and RDC in 83 JE patients (28 men; median age: 63 yr; IQR: 54-70 yr). Twenty-one healthy subjects (11 men; median age: 28 yr; range: 26-30 yr) were used as a control group. All patients underwent solid-state HRM with ten 5-ml single swallows (SS) and one to three 10-ml MRS; 34 patients also underwent RDC. Data are shown as median (interquartile range). Abnormal motor inhibition was noted during at least one MRS test in 48% of JE patients compared with 29% of controls ( P = 0.29). Mean distal contractile integral (DCI) after MRS was significantly lower than after SS [6,028 (3,678-9,267) mmHg·cm·s vs. 7,514 (6,238-9,197) mmHg·cm·s, P = 0.02], as was highest DCI ( P < 0.0001). Consequently, 66% of JE patients had no contraction reserve. At least one variable of obstruction during RDC (performed in 34 patients) was outside the normal range in 25 (74%) of JE patients. Both highest DCI after SS and pressure gradient across the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) during RDC were higher in patients with dysphagia versus those without ( P = 0.04 and 0.01, respectively). Our data suggest altered neural control in JE patients with heterogeneity in inhibitory function. Furthermore, some patients had latent EGJ obstruction during RDC, which correlated with the presence of dysphagia. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Presence of abnormal inhibition was observed during multiple rapid swallows (MRS) in some but not all patients with jackhammer esophagus (JE). Unlike healthy subjects, JE patients were more strongly stimulated after single swallows than after MRS. An obstructive pattern was frequently observed during rapid drink challenge (RDC) and was related to presence of dysphagia. MRS and RDC during high-resolution manometry are useful to show individual pathophysiological patterns in JE and may guide optimal therapeutic strategies.

Background and Aim: Acute esophageal acid infusion promotes distension-induced secondary peristalsis. The gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor type B (GABA-B) receptors activation inhibits secondary peristalsis. This study aimed to test the hypothesis whether acid excitation of secondary peristalsis can be influenced by baclofen., Methods: Secondary peristalsis was performed with intra-esophageal slow and rapid air injections in 13 healthy subjects. Direct esophageal infusion of 0.1 N HCl following pretreatment with placebo or baclofen was randomly performed at least 1 week apart. Symptom intensity, distension thresholds, and peristaltic parameters were determined and compared between each study protocol., Results: The intensity of heartburn symptom in response to esophageal acid infusion was significantly greater with baclofen than the placebo (P = 0.002). The threshold volume of secondary peristalsis during slow air injections in response to acid infusion was significantly greater with baclofen than the placebo (P = 0.001). Baclofen significantly increased the threshold volume of secondary peristalsis during rapid air injections in response to acid infusion (P = 0.001). The frequency of secondary peristalsis in response to acid infusion was significantly decreased by baclofen as compared with the placebo (P = 0.001). Baclofen significantly decreased peristaltic amplitudes in response to acid infusion during rapid air injections (P = 0.007)., Conclusions: Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor type B agonist baclofen inhibits acid excitation of secondary peristalsis in human esophagus, which is probably mediated by both muscular and mucosal mechanoreceptors. This work supports the evidence of potential involvement of GABA-B receptors in negative modulation of acid excitation of esophageal perception as well as secondary peristalsis., (© 2018 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: This study assessed whether high-resolution manometry (HRM) with a test meal can detect clinically relevant, abnormal motility already in very early systemic sclerosis (SSc) and whether this finding is associated with subsequent disease progression., Methods: This prospective, longitudinal cohort study recruited 68 consecutive SSc patients (group #1: 32 established disease (ACR, American College of Rheumatology /EULAR, The European League against Rheumatism 2013 and ACR 1980 criteria fulfilled); group #2: 24 early disease (only ACR/EULAR 2013 fulfilled); group #3: 12 very early disease (clinical expert diagnosis of SSc) and 72 healthy controls. HRM evaluated esophageal motility for water swallows and a solid test meal., Results: Systemic sclerosis patients had less frequent effective esophageal contractions during the test meal compared to healthy controls even in very early disease (0.15, 1.0, 2.1 per minute for groups #1, #2, and #3, vs 2.5 per minute in health; P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.0085, respectively). Ineffective motility at HRM was associated with a higher modified Rodnan skin score at baseline. Moreover, at mean 18 (10-31) months of follow-up, the presence of ineffective motility at baseline was associated with progression of skin disease (P = 0.01). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis identified hypotensive peristalsis in the test meal (<15% effective solid swallows) and low distal contractile integral (DCI; <400 mm Hg·cm·s) as predictors for skin aggravation, but not for new organ involvement., Conclusion: Ineffective motility during a test meal is present already in patients with very early SSc. Findings on HRM studies are associated with disease severity at baseline, and low percentage of effective swallows in test meal and low mean DCI are both predictors of skin progression during follow-up., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Gastric and esophageal dysmotility syndromes are some of the most common motility diagnoses, but little is known about their interrelationship., Aims: The aim of our study was to determine if a correlation exists between gastric and esophageal dysmotility syndromes., Methods: We reviewed the records of all patients who underwent both solid gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) within a 2 year period, with both done between August 2012 and August 2017. All GESs were classified as either rapid, normal, or delayed. All HRMs were classified according to the Chicago Classification 3.0. Correlations were assessed using Fisher's exact test and multiple logistic regression., Results: In total, 482 patients met inclusion criteria. Of patients with a normal, delayed, and rapid GES, 53.1, 64.5, and 77.3% had an abnormal HRM, respectively (p < 0.05 vs. normal GES). Likewise, patients with an abnormal HRM were more likely to have an abnormal GES (54.9 vs. 41.8%, p = 0.005). Multiple logistic regression showed abnormal GES [odds ratio (OR) 2.14], age (OR 1.013), scleroderma (OR 6.29), and dysphagia (OR 2.63) were independent predictors of an abnormal HRM. Likewise, an abnormal HRM (OR 2.11), diabetes (OR 1.85), heart or lung transplantation (OR 2.61), and autonomic dysfunction (OR 2.37) were independent predictors of an abnormal GES., Conclusions: The correlation between an abnormal GES and HRM argues for common pathogenic mechanisms of these motility disorders, and possibly common future treatment options. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for another motility disorder if one is present.

Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) has advanced the understanding of esophageal motor function and the ability to diagnose and manage disorders of esophageal motility. In this review, we describe the indications for and the technical performance of HRM. The Chicago classification of esophageal motor function, now in its third iteration, streamlines and standardizes the nomenclature and basic interpretation of HRM data depicted as Clouse topographic plots. In clinical practice, HRM is an important diagnostic test for patients with dysphagia as well as patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), particularly in those patients with a suboptimal symptomatic response to antisecretory therapy. HRM can support diagnoses such as achalasia, as well as provide evidence for behavioral disorders such as rumination syndrome or supragastric belching with the assistance of postprandial HRM with impedance. Further, the GERD classification of motor function introduces a three-part hierarchical evaluation of esophageal motor function in GERD, highlighting the value of assessment of esophageal contractile reserve through provocative maneuvers during HRM such as multiple rapid swallows.

Background: Besides stricture formation, diminished esophageal motility after caustic esophageal burns also plays a role in the deterioration of the clinical course. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of caustic burn on the esophageal contractions and the effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on these changes., Methods: Twenty-one Wistar albino rats were divided into three groups [Sham operation (n = 8), caustic esophageal burn with NaOH (n = 6), PRP treatment after caustic burn (n = 7)]. After 3 weeks, esophagectomy was performed and contractions and EFS responses were evaluated in the organ bath., Results: KCl- and acetylcholine-induced responses were reduced in the Burn group, but increased in Sham and PRP groups (p < 0.05). EFS responses were higher in Burn group compared to the other groups. Response with L-arginine was increased in Burn group, but decreased in PRP group. There was more decrease in the contraction in Sham and PRP groups compared to the Burn group after SNP (sodium nitroprusside) incubation (p < 0.05). L-NAME (Nω-Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester) did not change the EFS responses in the Burn group, but EFS responses were decreased significantly in Sham and PRP groups (p < 0.05). EFS responses were decreased in all groups, but more in the Sham and PRP groups after Y-27632 (Rho-kinase inhibitor) incubation (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: For the first time, we demonstrated that both cholinergic and non-adrenergic non-cholinergic mechanisms are responsible for the altered motility in corrosive esophageal injury. Our results suggest that PRP treatment may be helpful in regulating the esophageal motility and decreasing altered contractions in corrosive burns. This effect may also contribute to the reduction of stricture formation, especially by reducing inappropriate contractions of the esophageal wall during the post-burn healing phase.

Purpose of Review: Bariatric surgery is the best therapeutic approach to patients with morbid obesity, but there is mounting evidence that it is associated with esophageal dysfunctions, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and motor disorders. In the present review, we summarize the existing information on the complex link between bariatric surgery and esophageal disorders., Recent Findings: Although high-quality studies on these effects are lacking, because of evident methodological flaws and retrospective nature, the review of published investigations show that pure restrictive procedures, such as laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAPG) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), are associated with de novo development or worsening of GERD. Moreover, LAGB is the procedure with the greatest frequency of esophageal motor disorders, including impairment of LES relaxation and ineffective esophageal peristalsis associated with esophageal dilation. LSG seems to be less associated with esophageal dysmotility, although evidence derived from studies with objective measurements of esophageal dysfunction is limited. Finally, RYGB seems to be the best procedure for improvement of GERD symptoms and preservation of esophageal function., Summary: Overall, the restrictive-malabsorptive approach represented by RYGB must be preferred to pure restrictive operations in order to avoid the negative consequences of bariatric surgery on esophageal functions.

Background: High-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) has become a leading tool in the assessment of esophageal motor disorders, replacing conventional manometry. However, there is limited data about the contribution of HREM as compared with conventional manometry to the assessment of esophageal motor disorders in patients with non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP). The aim of the study was to compare the distribution of esophageal motor disorders in patients with NCCP using HREM as compared with conventional manometry and to determine if HREM improved diagnosis of these disorders., Methods: In this study, we included 300 consecutive patients with NCCP who underwent either HREM or conventional manometry over a period of 10 years. A total of 150 patients had conventional manometry and the other 150 patients HREM. The Chicago 3.0 classification and the Castell and Spechler classification were used to determine the esophageal motor disorder of NCCP patients undergoing HREM and conventional manometry, respectively., Key Results: In both HREM and the conventional manometry groups, normal esophageal motility was the most frequent finding (47% and 36%; respectively, P = .054). Hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter was the most common motility disorder identified by conventional manometry (27.3%), while ineffective esophageal motility was the most common esophageal motor disorder identified by HREM (25.3%)., Conclusions & Inferences: There is a discrepancy in the type of esophageal motor disorders identified by HREM as compared with conventional manometry in NCCP patients. Hypotensive motility disorders are the most commonly diagnosed by both manometric techniques., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Esophageal pressure topography (EPT) diagnosis of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) can be non-specific with unclear clinical significance., Aims: To determine whether peristaltic vigor or lower esophageal sphincter (LES) integrity is associated with poor clearance and acid reflux in IEM., Methods: Bolus clearance on high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) and available reflux studies in patients with IEM were retrospectively reviewed. Bolus clearance was assessed using both line tracing and colored contour methods on HRIM. EPT parameters, bolus clearance, and acid reflux variables were explored., Key Results: Eighty-eight patients with IEM were included. Bolus clearance occurred in 71% of all swallows, and 55.7% of patients had complete bolus transit (CBT, bolus clearance in ≥80% of swallows). Bolus clearance was impaired in swallows with distal contractile integral (DCI) <100 mmHg•cm•s compared to DCI 100-450 (0.43 vs 0.79, P < .0001). A cutoff at DCI 100 mmHg•cm•s was associated with clearance with an accuracy of 76% compared to 49% at DCI 450 (P = .0001 for both). A median DCI <100 was associated with a higher Eckardt score (9 vs 3, P = .03), and on reflux testing available in 47 patients, with abnormal acid exposure time (P = .002). Peristaltic reserve (PR) defined as (DCI of multiple rapid swallow/median DCI of wet swallows), integrated relaxation pressure, and resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure were not associated with clearance or acid exposure., Conclusions & Inferences: Failed peristalsis, as defined by DCI <100 mmHg•cm•s, is associated with impaired bolus clearance and more severe dysphagia in IEM, and likely abnormal acid exposure., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Electric stimulation (ES) could induce contraction of intestinal smooth muscle. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of ES on esophageal motility and the underlying mechanism in vivo. Twenty-eight rabbits were equipped with a pair of subserosa electrodes (connected to an electrical stimulator) in the lower segment of the esophagus. The ES signal consisted of bipolar rectangular pulse trains, lasting for 3 s, with different amplitudes (1 mA, 3 mA, 5 mA and 10 mA), and frequencies (10 Hz, 20 Hz and 50 Hz). The amplitude of the contraction was recognized by high-resolution manometry. The effect of ES was tested under anesthesia and following administration of atropine, phentolamine or L-NAME. ES induced esophageal contraction at the stimulated site. A statistically significant increase in esophageal pressure was observed when the stimulation amplitude was above 3 mA. The increase in esophageal pressure was associated with the amplitude of stimulus as well as the frequency. During stimulation, atropine, phentolamine and L-NAME had no effect on the increase of esophageal pressure induced by ES. These findings implied that ES induced esophageal contraction were not mediated via the NANC, adrenergic or cholinergic pathway. The amplitude of esophageal contraction was current and frequency dependent.

Background: We hypothesized that symptoms in Jackhammer esophagus (JH) are associated with an imbalance between the prepeak and postpeak phases of contraction. Thus, we developed a method to distinguish the contractile integral components of prepeak and postpeak phase contractile activity to determine the contribution of each phase and their association with dysphagia., Methods: Patients diagnosed with JH were enrolled and compared to controls. The first five intact swallows during manometry were analyzed. A single swallow was divided into a prepeak and postpeak phase. The contractile integral of each phase and its corresponding time-controlled integral were computed. All metrics were compared between controls and JH patients subcategorized by the impaction dysphagia question (IDQ) score with cut-off of 6., Key Results: Thirty eight JH patients and 71 controls were included. Twelve JH patients had IDQ ≤ 6 and 26 with IDQ > 6. JH patients had higher contractile integral in both phases, and a higher ratio between postpeak to prepeak contractile integral independent of duration. Similarly, JH patients with an IDQ > 6 had higher contractile metrics than those with IDQ ≤ 6. There was a correlation between the IDQ score and the ratio within the postpeak to prepeak contractile integral (r = .375)., Conclusions: Abnormalities in contractile integral of the postpeak phase are more significant in JH with higher dysphagia scores Although the total postpeak contractile integral was higher in symptomatic patients, this was associated with longer duration of postpeak activity suggesting that dysphagia patients with JH have a defect in the postpeak phase of peristalsis., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Longitudinal esophageal body shortening with swallow-induced peristalsis has been reported in healthy individuals. Esophageal shortening is immediately followed by esophageal re-elongation, and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) returns to the baseline position. High-resolution manometry (HRM) allows for objective assessment of extent of shortening and duration of shortening. In patients without hiatal hernia at rest, swallow-induced esophageal shortening can lead to transient hiatal hernia (tHH) which at times may persist after the completion of swallow. This manometric finding has not been investigated in the literature, but a question arises whether this swallow-induced transient herniation can effect on the likelihood of gastroesophageal reflux. This study aims to assess the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and the subtypes of swallow-induced esophageal shortening, i.e. tHH and non-tHH, in patients without hiatal hernia at rest. After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, we queried a prospectively maintained database to identify patients who underwent HRM evaluation and 24-hour pH study between January to December 2015. Patients with type-I esophagogastric junction (EGJ) morphology (i.e. no hiatal hernia) according to the Chicago classification v3.0 were included. The patterns of the esophageal shortening with swallows were divided into two subtypes, i.e. tHH and non-tHH. tHH was defined as an EGJ double high-pressure zones (≥1 cm) at the second inspiration after the termination of swallow-induced esophageal body contraction. The number of episodes of tHH was counted per 10 swallows and tHH size was measured for each patient. In total, 41 patients with EGJ morphology Type-I met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 47.2 years, 35 patients (85.4%) were women, and the mean body mass index was 33.9 kg/m2. The mean number of tHH episodes was 3 out of 10 swallows; mean maximal tHH size was 1.3 cm. Patients who had tHH in ≥3 out of 10 swallows (n = 16; 39.0%) were more likely to have abnormal DeMeester scores than patients with <3 swallows (56% vs. 28%; P = 0.070). Patients with maximal tHH ≥2 cm in at least 1 swallow (n = 17; 41.5%) were more likely to experience pathological reflux than patients with maximal tHH <2 cm (59% vs. 25%; P = 0.029). In conclusion, we showed that, in a subset of patients with Type-I EGJ morphology, swallowing induced transient EGJ double high-pressure zones (≥1 cm) after peristalsis. We have named this new manometric finding the swallow-induced tHH. A high prevalence of pathological reflux disease was observed in patients with maximal tHH ≥2 cm. The degree of swallow-induced tHH could be an early indicator of lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction in patients without manometric hiatal hernia.

This study aims to investigate pre-clinical esophageal involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc) by high-resolution impedance manometry (HRiM), its associations with disease features including lung involvement, and its predictivity of esophageal symptoms overtime. Charts of 45 asymptomatic (no heartburn/regurgitation/dysphagia) SSc patients (96% females; mean age 46 years) with at least one follow-up (FU) visit and complete clinical, serological, functional, and radiological assessment, including high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest and lung function tests, that had undergone esophageal HRiM were retrospectively evaluated. Esophagogastric junction-contractile integral (EGJ-CI) and esophageal body motility, as evaluated by mean distal contractile integral (DCI), were assessed. SSc patients had a normal esophageal motility in 7/45 cases, a defective EGJ-CI in 28, an ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) in 17, and aperistalsis in 12. Defective EGJ-CI was associated with IEM/aperistalsis in 20 cases, while 9 patients had isolated IEM. Defective EGJ-CI and/or IEM/aperistalsis were associated with a diffusing lung capacity for CO < 80% of predicted value (all p < 0.05), while defective EGJ-CI was also associated with interstitial lung disease on HRCT (p = 0.03). Prevalence of any HRiM abnormality was higher in anti-centromere antibody negative patients (all p < 0.05). IEM/aperistalsis independently increased the risk of esophageal symptoms by 2.3-fold (95% CI 1.1-5.7) and was associated with their higher cumulative incidence with respect to patients with other HRiM patterns at FU (χ 2  = 4.63; p = 0.03). SSc patients asymptomatic for esophageal involvement can have HRiM abnormalities in up to 84% of cases. A baseline-impaired motility is a risk factor for symptomatic esophageal disease.

Background: Dysphagia and non-cardiac chest pain are common symptoms associated with a novel hypercontractile disorder, namely Jackhammer esophagus (JE). The aim of this study was to explore these symptoms in patients with JE and to elucidate associations with disease defining metrics, crucial for subsequent therapies., Methods: All consecutive patients, who were referred between January 2014 and December 2016 and fulfilled the criteria for JE were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were opioid intake, previous gastrointestinal surgery, mechanical esophageal obstruction and diseases explaining their symptoms., Key Results: Of 2205 examined subjects, thirty patients (females: n = 17, 56.7%) with a median age of 58 (51.6-64.9) years were finally enrolled. Dysphagia was noted in 53.3% (n = 16), whereas non-cardiac chest pain was specified within 40% (n = 12) with symptom duration of up to 10 years. Perception of dysphagia (P = .03) and presence of both symptoms (P = .008) increased to the end of the study period. Dysphagia was significantly associated with distal contractile integral (DCI) scores of all (P = .023), hypercontractile (P = .011) and maximum DCI swallows (P = .008). Symptoms duration influenced hypercontractile DCI scores (P = .015, r = .438) and significantly correlated with the intensity of perceived dysphagia (P = .01, r = .585). Presence of non-cardiac chest pain was not associated with any of these metrics., Conclusions & Interferences: The DCI mediates dysphagia in patients with JE. Duration of symptoms affected hypercontractile DCI scores and aggravated perception of dysphagia indicating a progressive character of disease., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Chronic intestinal idiopathic pseudo-obstruction (idiopathic CIPO) is a rare heterogeneous condition for which the different phenotypes are difficult to be established. Oesophageal motility has shown to be impaired in patients with idiopathic CIPO at traditional manometry, whereas no studies have assessed it by high resolution manometry (HRM)., Aims: To evaluate oesophageal motility by HRM in patients with idiopathic CIPO., Methods: 14 patients with idiopathic CIPO underwent oesophageal HRM. Multiple rapid swallows (MRS) were performed in order to evaluate contraction reserve. The Chicago Classification 3.0 was used to classify the oesophageal motility disorders., Results: One idiopathic CIPO patient had type-II achalasia, one aperistalsis and 12 had minor disorder of peristalsis (11 ineffective oesophageal motility and one fragmented peristalsis). These minor disorders were not significantly different from those of 50 other consecutive patients who underwent HRM for dysphagia or GERD and received the diagnosis of ineffective oesophageal motility. Three of the 12 idiopathic CIPO patients with minor disorder of peristalsis had no contraction reserve after MRS., Conclusions: HRM is able to identify different grades of oesophageal motor impairment in patients with idiopathic CIPO. Presence of major oesophageal dismotility or absent contraction reserve suggest a more severe and widespread motor disorder., (Copyright © 2017 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aim: Although basic research has shown that certain cytokines affect gastrointestinal motility, the clinical evidence is lacking. The objective of this study was to explore the association between mucosally expressed cytokines and the esophageal motility function in humans., Methods: We enrolled a total of 57 patients with suspected esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) who underwent high-resolution manometry., Results: The diagnoses of the patients were as follows: normal esophageal motility (n = 25), ineffective esophageal motility (n = 5), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO; n = 10), distal esophageal spasm (n = 5), achalasia (n = 10), absent contractility (n = 1), and jackhammer esophagus (n = 1). The expression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) was significantly higher in EGJOO (14.6, 14.0-15.8, n = 10) than in normal esophageal motility (13.3, 12.8-14.1, n = 25); however, there was no difference in the expression of TNF-α between achalasia (13.4, 13.0-14.1, n = 10) and normal esophageal motility (13.3, 12.8-14.1, n = 25). EGJOO was discriminated from achalasia/normal by a linear discriminant analysis (AUC = 0.917). A multivariable regression analysis revealed that interleukin (IL)-13 and IL-23A were predictive of the distal contractile integral, whereas TNF-α and IL-6 were predictive of the basal EGJ pressure., Conclusions: The esophageal motility was associated with mucosally expressed cytokines in humans; these cytokines could be useful targets for the diagnosis and treatment of EMDs., (© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: In this study we assessed high-resolution manometry (HRM) findings in patients with dermatomyositis and polymyositis., Methods: From 2008 to 2015, we performed a cross-sectional study of myositis patients. A survey of esophageal symptoms and HRM data were analyzed and compared among different clinical and serologic groups., Results: Twenty-four (45%) of the 53 patients included in the study had manometric involvement that was not correlated with any esophageal symptom (P = 0.8). Failed waves (34% vs. 0%, P = 0.004) and decreased upper esophageal sphincter pressure (50 vs. 70 mm Hg, P = 0.03) were more common in polymyositis than in dermatomyositis patients. Jackhammer esophagus was more common in anti-TIF1-γ patients (30% vs. 9%, P = 0.04), and lower esophageal sphincter involvement (47% vs. 25%, P = 0.03) was more prevalent in patients with the antisynthetase syndrome., Conclusions: Esophageal involvement is common in myositis patients, but it correlates poorly with esophageal symptoms. Specific clinical and serologic groups have different manometric features. Muscle Nerve 56: 386-392, 2017., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: The factors that determine how people eat when they are healthy or have disease have not been defined. We used high resolution manometry (HRM) to assess pharyngeal swallowing and oesophageal motility during ingestion of a solid test meal (STM) in healthy volunteers and patients with motility disorders., Methods: This study was based at University Hospital Zurich (Zürich, Switzerland). Healthy volunteers who responded to an advertisement completed HRM with ten single water swallows (SWS) in recumbent and upright positions followed by a 200 g rice STM in the upright position. Healthy volunteers were stratified for age and sex to ensure a representative population. For comparison, consecutive patients with major motility disorders on SWS and patients with dysphagia but no major motility disorders on SWS (disease controls) were selected from a database that was assembled prospectively; the rice meal data were analysed retrospectively. During STM, pharyngeal swallows were timed and oesophageal contractions were classified as representing normal motility or different types of abnormal motility in accordance with established metrics. Factors that could potentially be associated with eating speed were investigated, including age, sex, body-mass index, and presence of motility disorder. We compared diagnoses based on SWS findings, assessed with the Chicago Classification v3.0, with those based on STM findings, assessed with the Chicago Classification adapted for solids. These studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02407938 and NCT02397616., Findings: Between April 2, 2014, and May 13, 2015, 72 healthy volunteers were recruited and underwent HRM. Additionally, we analysed data from 54 consecutive patients with major motility disorders and 53 with dysphagia but no major motility disorders recruited between April 2, 2013, and Dec 18, 2014. We found important variations in oesophageal motility and eating speed during meal ingestion in healthy volunteers and patients. Increased time between swallows was accompanied by more effective oesophageal contractions (in healthy volunteers, 20/389 [5%] effective swallows at <4 s between swallows vs 586/900 [65%] effective swallows at >11 s between swallows, p<0·0001). Obstructive, spastic, or hypercontractile swallows were rare in healthy volunteers (total <1%). Patients with motility disorders ate slower than healthy volunteers (14·95 g [IQR 11-25] per min vs 32·9 g [25-40] per min, p<0·0001) and pathological oesophageal motility were reproduced when patients consumed the STM. In healthy volunteers, eating speed was associated only with frequency of swallows (slope 2·5 g per min per pharyngeal swallow per min [95% CI 1·1-4·0], p=0·0009), whereas in patients with dysphagia, it was correlated with frequency of effective oesophageal contractions (6·4 g per min per effective contraction per min [4·3-8·5], p<0·0001). Diagnostic agreement was good between the HRM with SWS and rice STM (intra-class correlation coefficient r=0·81, 95% CI 0·74-0·87, p<0·0001)., Interpretation: Our results show normative values for pharyngeal swallowing and oesophageal motility in healthy volunteers. Detailed analysis of HRM data acquired during an STM shows that the rate-limiting factor for intake of solids in health is the frequency of pharyngeal swallowing and not oesophageal contractility. The reverse is true in patients with oesophageal motility disorders, in whom the frequency of effective oesophageal contractions determines eating speed., Funding: University Hospital Zurich., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)