Search

Background: The prognosis for patients with esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery has shown improvement in recent years. We sought to identify the critical factors contributing to enhanced survival outcomes., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively examined 427 patients with esophageal cancer treated with nCRT and esophagectomy across two periods: P1 (from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2011) and P2 (from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2017). The introduction of the CROSS regimen and total meso-esophagectomy in P2 prompted an evaluation of their effects on perioperative outcomes and overall survival (OS)., Results: During P2, the occurrence of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy increased significantly from 3.9 to 16.8% (p < 0.001), while pneumonia and in-hospital mortality rates remained unchanged. The median OS improved from 19.2 to 29.2 months (p < 0.001) between P1 and P2. Multivariable analysis identified higher nodal yields and the achievement of major response as favorable prognostic factors. Conversely, an involved circumferential resection margin (CRM), an advanced ypN stage, and pneumonia were independently associated with poor outcomes. Patients treated during P2 had a lower prevalence of involved CRM (10% vs. 25.1%, p < 0.001), a higher rate of major response (52.7% vs. 34.8%, p < 0.01), and a greater nodal yield (27.8 vs. 10.9, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: The clinical outcomes following nCRT and surgery have improved significantly over time. This progress can be attributed to multiple factors, with the primary drivers being the refinement of nCRT protocols and the application of radical surgery., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: In patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who had undergone chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the limitations of radiological evaluation may necessitate surgical exploration to ascertain disease resectability. Upon intraoperative confirmation of T4b disease (sT4b), the optimal management strategy remains unclear. While some surgeons may opt against resection, others advocate for palliative esophagectomy (PE). Regrettably, the current literature does not provide a consensus on the most effective approach for managing these intricate cases., Methods: The study cohort consisted of 68 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who presented with sT4b disease following CRT. The perioperative outcomes and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients who underwent PE (n = 56) and those who received an open-close (OC) procedure (n = 12)., Results: Patients who underwent an OC procedure experienced a shorter hospital stay (16.5 vs. 28.8 days; p = 0.052) and showed a non-significant reduction in the rate of major complications (33.9% vs. 25%; p = 0.549) and in-hospital mortality (0% vs. 5.4%; p = 0.412) than those who received PE; however, PE was associated with a superior 2-year OS rate than OC (9.6% vs. 0%; p = 0.009). In multivariable analysis, a pretreatment clinical stage of II/III (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.87; p = 0.013) and PE with retrosternal reconstruction (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-0.49; p = 0.010) were independently associated with a more favorable OS., Conclusion: PE with retrosternal reconstruction may be a feasible approach for patients with ESCC exhibiting sT4b disease after CRT., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: Robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy and conventional minimally invasive oesophagectomy are superior to open techniques. However, few studies have directly compared the outcomes of the two minimally invasive approaches., Methods: A retrospective study of patients from six medical centres with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent minimally invasive oesophagectomy between 2015 and 2022. Perioperative outcomes were compared after applying inverse probability of treatment weighting., Results: The study included 577 patients (robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy: 206; conventional minimally invasive oesophagectomy: 371). After applying inverse probability of treatment weighting, robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy was found to yield a higher number of mediastinal nodes compared with conventional minimally invasive oesophagectomy (14.86 versus 12.66, P = 0.017). Robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy was notably effective in retrieving upper mediastinal left recurrent laryngeal nerve nodes, averaging 1.97 nodes versus 1.14 nodes harvested by conventional minimally invasive oesophagectomy (P < 0.001). This was coupled by a significant decrease in nerve palsy rates (13.9% versus 22.8%, P = 0.020). A significantly larger percentage of patients in the robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy group had an uncomplicated postoperative course (51.8% versus 34%, P < 0.001). Robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy also led to a reduction in pneumonia rates (8.6% versus 15.2%, P = 0.041) and was linked to a shorter length of stay (length of stay; 16.64 versus 21.14 days, P = 0.007). The advantage of robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy in reducing the length of stay was especially pronounced in patients with a high Charlson co-morbidity index (≥2, mean difference 8.46 days; P = 0.0069) and those who underwent neoadjuvant therapy (mean difference 5.63 days; P < 0.001)., Conclusion: In oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the use of robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy led to fewer cases of pneumonia and faster recovery compared with conventional minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Additionally, robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy significantly improved the feasibility and safety of performing lymph node dissection along the recurrent laryngeal nerve., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd.)

Background: Surgery for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma involves dissecting lymph nodes along the recurrent laryngeal nerve. This is technically challenging and injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve may lead to vocal cord palsy, which increases the risk of pulmonary complications. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted oesophagectomy (RAO) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy (VAO) for dissection of lymph nodes along the left RLN., Methods: Patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were scheduled for minimally invasive McKeown oesophagectomy were allocated randomly to RAO or VAO, stratified by centre. The primary endpoint was the success rate of left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection. Success was defined as the removal of at least one lymph node without causing nerve damage lasting longer than 6 months. Secondary endpoints were perioperative and oncological outcomes., Results: From June 2018 to March 2022, 212 patients from 3 centres in Asia were randomized, and 203 were included in the analysis (RAO group 103; VAO group 100). Successful left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection was achieved in 88.3% of the RAO group and 69% of the VAO group (P < 0.001). The rate of removal of at least one lymph node according to pathology was 94.2% for the RAO and 86% for the VAO group (P = 0.051). At 1 week after surgery, the RAO group had a lower incidence of left recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy than the VAO group (20.4 versus 34%; P = 0.029); permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy rates at 6 months were 5.8 and 20% respectively (P = 0.003). More mediastinal lymph nodes were dissected in the RAO group (median 16 (i.q.r. 12-22) versus 14 (10-20); P = 0.035). Postoperative complication rates were comparable between the two groups and there were no in-hospital deaths., Conclusion: In patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, RAO leads to more successful left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection than VAO, including a lower rate of short- and long-term recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Registration number: NCT03713749 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd.)

The question as to whether the clinical benefits of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (VATE) do outweigh its increased costs remains unanswered. Here, we analyzed the cost-effectiveness of VATE versus open esophagectomy (OE) in a real-world setting. Using 2008-2015 Taiwanese Health Insurance claim data, we identified 3271 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy. By taking into account nine confounding variables, we constructed a 1:1 propensity score-matched sample of patients who underwent VATE or OE (n = 629 each). Direct costs incurred within three years after surgery and survival were analyzed. There were no significant intergroup differences in terms of R0 resection rates, length of stay, as well as 30- and 90-day mortality and unplanned readmission rates. However, the number of dissected nodes was higher in the VATE group (median: 24 vs. 18, P < 0.001). While VATE had higher index hospitalization costs (median, 12331 USD vs. 10730 USD, P < 0.001), cost differences were reduced over time. The average accumulated cost person-month of VATE declined below that of OE at 14 months after hospital discharge. Overall survival (OS) figures were more favorable for patients treated with VATE (3-year OS: 47% vs. 41%; life expectancy: 4.04 life-years [LY] vs. 3.30 LY). The cost-effectiveness plane showed that only 0.3% of all VATE procedures were more costly and less effective than OE. The probabilities for VATE to be cost-effective at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of 10000 and 50000 USD/LY were 63.5% and 92.4%, respectively. Using commonly accepted WTP thresholds, VATE was more cost-effective than OE for patients with esophageal cancer., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Lymph node dissection (LND) along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is a technically challenging part of esophageal cancer surgery, especially after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Robotic surgery holds promise to increase its safety and feasibility. The aim of this study was to describe a single thoracoscopic surgeon's experience related to the transition from video-assisted esophagectomy (VATE) to robotic esophagectomy (RE)-with a special focus on the safety of left RLN LND. Patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy and RLN dissection following CRT were dichotomized according to the use of robotic surgery (robotic esophagectomy [RE] versus video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy [VATE]). The following parameters were determined: (1) number of dissected nodes, (2) rates of RLN palsy, (3) rates of perioperative complications, and (4) learning curve. Learning curve analysis was performed using the 10-patient moving average (MA) for operation times and with the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method for left RLN LND (target failure rate: 15%). The RE and VATE groups consisted of 39 and 67 patients, respectively. The intraoperative identification of the left RLN was more common in the RE group (97.4%) than in the VATE group (68.7%; P < 0.001). Postoperative left RLN palsy was significantly more frequent in the VATE group (26.9%) than in the RE group (10.3%; P = 0.042), with a higher rate of pneumonia in the former (16.4% versus 2.6%; P = 0.03). The MA chart revealed a downward trend followed by a flattening of the RE operation time at operation number 17 and 29, respectively. CUSUM analysis showed that the left RLN palsy rate decreased to the target rate after 12 operations. We conclude that at least 12 cases are required for a surgeon with prior experience in VATE to safely accomplish left RLN LND through a robotic approach., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Esophagectomy is the primary surgical treatment for esophageal cancer. However, patients often experience a decrease in physical activity, poor nutrition, and a reduction in quality of life following surgery., Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of an exercise and nursing education health informatics program on quality of life, exercise capacity, and nutrition among patients following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer., Design: A randomized controlled trial., Settings and Methods: Patients who had undergone an esophagectomy for cancer were recruited by purposive sampling from a medical center in Taiwan. Patients who met inclusion criteria and agreed to participate (N = 88) were randomly assigned to an exercise informatics program (intervention group, n = 44) or usual post-surgery care (control group, n = 44). Quality of life was assessed at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after discharge. Secondary outcomes of nutrition (albumin, body mass index), and exercise capacity (maximal oxygen uptake, the six-minute walking test) were conducted at baseline and 3 months following discharge. Differences in quality of life, nutrition and exercise capacity between the two groups were analyzed using generalized estimating equations., Results: Analysis demonstrated significant improvements in outcome measures following hospital discharge for the intervention group compared to controls. Measures of quality of life were significantly better for the intervention group and varied with time following discharge. Functional scores for physical (1 and 3 months), role (1, 3, and 6 months), emotional (1 month), social (3 months) and global health (3 months) were significantly higher than controls. Cancer-related subscales improved for insomnia (1 and 3 months) and nausea/vomiting (3 and 6 months). Esophageal cancer-specific symptoms improved for dry mouth (1 month), dysphagia (3 months), and loss of taste (1 and 6 months). Three months following discharge, levels of albumin were significantly higher for the intervention group compared to controls (β=0.32, 95% CI 0.09, 0.54, p < .01); body mass index did not differ between groups. Exercise capacity was also significantly better; the intervention group had higher maximal oxygen consumption (β=2.61, 95% CI 1.54, 3.69, p < .001) and greater distance on the six-minute walking test (β=83.30, 95% CI 52.60, 113.99, p < .001)., Conclusion: The intervention group experienced significant improvements in nutrition, exercise capacity, and variables related to quality of life. These findings suggest a nurse-led exercise and health education informatics program should be implemented for survivors of esophagectomy prior to hospital discharge., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Radical lymph node dissection (LND) along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is surgically demanding and can be associated with substantial postoperative morbidity. The question of whether robot-assisted esophagectomy (RE) might be superior to video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (VATE) for performing LND along the RLN in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains open., Methods/design: We will conduct a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (Robotic-assisted Esophagectomy vs Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy (REVATE)) enrolling patients with ESCC scheduled to undergo LND along the RLN. Patients will be randomly assigned to either RE or VATE. The primary outcome measure will be the rate of unsuccessful LND along the left RLN, which will be defined as: failure to remove lymph nodes along the left RLN (i.e., no identifiable nodes on pathology reports); or occurrence of permanent (duration > 6 months) left RLN palsy following LND. Secondary outcomes will include the number of successfully removed RLN nodes, postoperative recovery, length of hospital stay, 30-day and 90-day mortality, quality of life, and oncological outcomes., Discussion: The REVATE study provides an opportunity to explore whether RE could facilitate LND along the left RLN-a complex surgical procedure that, as of now and with the use of VATE, remains difficult to perform and associated with a significant burden of morbidity., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03713749 . Registered on 22 October 2018.

Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the impact of early oral feeding (EOF) on postoperative cardiac, respiratory, and gastrointestinal (CRG) complications after McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer., Summary Background Data: Nil-by-mouth with enteral tube feeding is routinely practiced after esophagectomy., Methods: Patients were randomly allocated to receive oral feeding on the first postoperative day (EOF group) or late oral feeding (LOF group) 7 days after surgery. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of postoperative CRG complications, and the secondary outcomes included bowel function recovery and short-term quality of life (QOL)., Results: Between February 2014 and October 2015, 280 patients were enrolled in this study. There were 140 patients in the EOF group and 140 patients in the LOF group. EOF was noninferior to LOF for CRG complications (30.0% in the EOF group vs. 32.9% in the LOF group; 95% confidence interval of the difference: -13.8% to 8.0%). Compared with the LOF group, the EOF group showed significantly shorter time to first flatus (median of 2 days vs. 3 days, P = 0.001) and bowel movement (median of 3 vs. 4 days, P < 0.001). Two weeks after the operation, patients in the EOF group reported higher global QOL and function scores and lower symptom scores than patients in the LOF group., Conclusions: In patients after McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy is noninferior to the standard of care with regard to postoperative CRG complications. In addition, patients in the EOF group had a quicker recovery of bowel function and improved short-term QOL.

Objective: Radical lymph node dissection (LND) along the bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is a surgically challenging procedure with a high rate of morbidity. Here, we assessed in a retrospective manner the adequacy of LND along the RLN performed with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (RATE) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (VATE) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)., Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, propensity-matched study. ESCC patients who underwent McKeown esophagectomy and bilateral RLN LND with a minimally invasive approach were divided into two groups according to the use of robot-assisted surgery or not (RATE vs VATE, respectively). Using propensity score matching, 34 balanced matched pairs were identified. The number of dissected nodes as well as the rates of RLN palsy and perioperative complications served as the main outcome measures., Results: No conversion to open thoracotomy occurred in either group. Intraoperative blood loss and the need of blood transfusions did not show significant intergroup differences. The mean number of dissected nodes was similar in the two study groups, the only exception being the left RLN area. Specifically, the mean number of nodes removed from this region was 5.32 in the RATE group and 3.38 in patients who received VATE (p = 0.007). Notably, the RATE and VATE groups did not differ significantly with regard to rates of both RLN palsy (20.6 vs 29.4%, respectively, p = 0.401) and pulmonary complications (5.9 vs 17.6%, respectively, p = 0.259)., Conclusions: Compared with VATE, RATE resulted in a higher lymph node yield along the left RLN without increasing morbidity.

Background: The prognostic impact of perineural invasion (PNI) in patients with esophageal cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) remains unclear., Methods: A thorough pathological review of PNI was performed on post-nCRT esophagectomy specimens obtained from non-ypT0 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). When PNI was identified, it was classified according to the presence or absence of penetration through the nerve sheath (i.e., PNI surrounding the nerve sheath [PNI-SS] versus PNI penetrating through the nerve sheath [PNI-TS]). The impact of PNI on overall survival (OS) was assessed in combination with clinical and pathological risk factors., Results: A total of 177 eligible patients were identified between 1998 and 2008. PNI was identified in 43.5% (77/177) of participants. Of them, 33 and 44 had PNI-SS and PNI-TS, respectively. The 5-year OS rate of patients with PNI-TS was significantly lower (6.7%) than that observed in those without PNI (30.6%, P < 0.001). However, the 5-year OS observed in the latter group did not differ significantly from that of patients with PNI-SS (26%, P = 0.68). Multivariate analysis identified PNI-TS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.965, P = 0.02), LVI (HR = 1.514, P = 0.048), and ypN2 stage (HR = 2.39, P = 0.007) as independent adverse prognostic factors for OS., Conclusions: The presence of PNI-TS after nCRT is associated with poor survival. A thorough assessment of distinct PNI patterns (i.e., PNI-TS versus PNI-SS) should be part of the routine post-nCRT histopathological work-up of ESCC patients., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Background: The prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer who have poor response to chemoradiotherapy (ie, pathologic nonresponders [pNRs]) remains poor. We investigated whether the use of postoperative adjuvant therapy (AT) could improve survival in this patient group., Methods: Among patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and operation between 2000 and 2012, pNRs (defined as those having a postoperative T stage of equal or greater pretreatment T stage or persistent nodal disease) were identified and divided into two groups according to their subsequent management (AT versus surveillance). Survival and recurrence were compared after propensity score matching for the following five factors: age, performance status, pathological lymph node status after treatment (ypN) status, severity of postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay (LOS)., Results: Of the 115 pNRs, 74 and 41 received AT and surveillance alone, respectively. Patients who received AT were younger, had less major postoperative complications, and a shorter LOS. A total of 32 pairs of well-balanced patients (n = 64) were selected by propensity matching. A significant benefit in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) was observed for pNRs treated with AT compared with those undergoing surveillance (3-year DFS rate: 45% versus 22.3%, p = 0.022). However, more patients in the AT group died of causes unrelated to cancer, resulting only in a borderline increase of overall survival (OS) [3-year OS rate: 34.4% versus 21.6%, p = 0.13]., Conclusions: Postoperative AT can improve DFS in pNRs after nCRT. However, its use should be carefully weighed against a potential increase in the risk of treatment-related death., (Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The College of American Pathologists guidelines recommend examining at least four representative tumor blocks for determining pathological T stage in patients with primarily resected esophageal cancer. Whether the same pathological requirements are adequate in patients undergoing esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) remains unclear. We hypothesized that current examination protocols may underestimate the presence of microscopical residual disease after nCRT, potentially leading to under-staging. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with esophageal squamous cancer (ESCC) who were diagnosed as having pathological complete response (pCR) following nCRT. The thoroughness of the pathological examination in pCR patients was examined using (i) the number of blocks examined in suspicious tumor area (≤4 vs. >4), and (ii) the block quotient (calculated as the pretreatment tumor length divided by the number of blocks examined in suspicious tumor area). A total of 91 patients were enrolled. The mean number of blocks used to confirm pCR was 4.8 (range: 2-14). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in the entire cohort were 55% and 65%, respectively. Multivariate analyses identified the block quotient as the only independent predictor of OS and DFS. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated an optimal cutoff value of 1.4 for the block quotient. Among the patients who achieved pCR, the 5-year DFS differed significantly between subjects with a low (≤1.4) or high (>1.4) block quotient (76% vs. 47%, respectively, P = 0.03). The block quotient (calculated by the pretreatment tumor length divided by the number of blocks) - which reflects the meticulousness of the histopathological examination for confirming pCR - is associated with survival in ESCC patients., (© 2015 International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.)

Background: The role of adjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal cancer has been underestimated in the literature. This study was undertaken to determine whether adjuvant chemoradiation improves survival compared with surgery alone., Methods: Data of 1095 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients, including 679 in surgery alone group (group 1) and 416 in surgery followed adjuvant chemoradaition group (group 2), were obtained from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to identify 147 well-balanced patients in each group for overall survival comparison., Results: After PSM, the 3-year survival rates and median survival were 44.9% and 27.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.6-40.3) months in group 2, which is significantly higher than that in group 1 (28.1% and 18.2 [95% CI: 14.3-24.5] months, P = 0.0043). In the multivariate survival analysis, pT3/4 stage (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.38-2.97, P < 0.001), pN+ stage (HR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.31-2.57, P = 0.0004), tumor length more than 32 mm (HR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.33-2.79, P < 0.001), R1/2 resection (HR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.15-2.66, P = 0.009), and adjuvant chemoradiation (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.42-0.78, P < 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis suggested patients with pT3/4 stage, pN+ stage tumors, larger tumor size, poorly differentiated tumors, and R1/2 resections were more likely to demonstrate survival benefit from adjuvant chemoradiation., Conclusions: Compared with surgery alone, adjuvant chemoradiation provides a survival benefit to ESCC patients, especially those with pT3/4 stage, N+ tumors, larger tumor size, poorly differentiated tumors, and R1/2 resections.

Background: Few data are available on the survival outcomes of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who achieve complete response at the primary site but have residual nodal metastases after chemoradiotherapy. We sought to assess the survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with ypT0 N+ disease., Methods: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy were identified from the Taiwan Cancer Registry between 2008 and 2013. We compared the clinical and survival data of ypT0 N+ and ypT0 N0 patients. The median number of dissected nodes (n = 20) was used as the cutoff to classify the extent of lymph node dissection (LND). Survival data were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression models., Results: The study included 369 ypT0 patients (50 ypT0 N+ [13.6%] and 319 ypT0 N0 [86.4%]). The 3-year overall survival was significantly lower in ypT0 N+ patients (30.1%) than in ypT0 N0 patients (55.9%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that a higher number of positive lymph nodes (ypN2/N3 vs ypN1) was a strong adverse prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 3.76; p = 0.011) in ypT0 N+ patients. The extent of LND was identified as an independent predictor of survival in patients with ypT0 N0 disease (low vs high; hazard ratio, 1.49; p = 0.045). A stepwise decrease in 3-year overall survival rates was observed in the following groups: ypT0 N0 with high LND (61.2%), ypT0 N0 with low LND (50.3%), and ypT0 N+ (30.1%, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: At least 13.6% of ypT0 patients have lymph node metastases, which carry adverse prognostic implications. The number of positive nodes is the most important prognostic factor in this group., (Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Improving survival after esophagectomy is an important issue in treating patients with esophageal cancer (EC). In addition to standard hospitalization management, periodic assessment of quality-of-life (QOL) measures may be useful to detect disease progression from patients' subjective reports. Therefore, this prospective longitudinal study was undertaken to identify prognostic factors for 3-year survival of EC patients after esophagectomy and to evaluate the impact of QOL measures on these prognostic factors., Methods: Patients with EC (n = 67) who had a complete tumor resection and were alive 6 months after esophagectomy were followed in this study for 3 years. Data were collected on patients' sociodemographics, cancer characteristics, adjuvant therapy, general QOL and EC-specific QOL (before esophagectomy and 6 months afterward), cancer recurrence, and death. Patients' independent risk factors for 3-year survival were investigated by multivariate Cox regression analysis., Results: Of the 67 participants with EC, 26 had late mortality, with a median survival for the whole cohort of 38.2 months (95 % CI 31.97-44.35). Independent predictors of early death were early cancer recurrence (within 6 months after surgery), poor cognitive function (95 % CI 1.020-1.041), and worse dyspnea (95 % CI 1.007-1.034)., Conclusions: The most predictive factor for early death in EC patients after esophagectomy was cancer recurrence within 6 months after surgery. However, QOL measures could be a tool to provide clinical information from patients' perspective suggesting cancer recurrence.

Background: Although esophagectomy traditionally is recommended to perform within 8 weeks after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), data from neoadjuvantly treated rectal cancer patients demonstrate that delayed surgery ([8 weeks) can maximize the effect of CRT. Despite these promising data, investigators are concerned that delayed surgery may lead to tumor repopulation. We report the impact of delayed surgery in patients with esophageal cancer who were treated with nCRT., Methods: We retrospectively studied 276 esophageal cancer patients treated with nCRT and surgery between 2002 and 2008. We compared perioperative complication, rate of pathological complete response (pCR), distribution of tumor regression grade (TRG), and overall survival (OS) in patients who underwent surgery within 8 weeks (group A) and after 8 weeks (group B) after nCRT., Results: There were 138 patients in each group with similar pre/post-nCRT characteristics. Delayed surgery did not result in lower surgical risk or higher pCR rate. Survival outcome also did not improve following a longer surgery interval (5-year OS: group A vs. group B, 29 vs. 23 %; P = 0.3). On the contrary, a subgroup analysis showed that delayed surgery might be hazardous, especially in patients who demonstrate a good response after nCRT. The amount of residual cancer, as measured by TRG, increased significantly after a longer surgical interval (P = 0.024). Survival also decreased after a longer surgical interval (5-year OS B8 vs. [8 weeks, 50 vs. 35 %; P = 0.038)., Conclusions: After nCRT, esophagectomy should be performed within 8 weeks, especially in patients with good response.

Background: Close circumferential resection margin (CRM) is an established predictor for locoregional recurrence (LR) in rectal cancer but remains controversial in esophageal malignancy. As yet, little is known about the significance of CRM after chemoradiotherapy (CRT), especially in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). This study investigated the relationship between CRM distance and recurrence after neoadjuvant CRT in esophageal SCC patients., Methods: Between 1997 and 2005, esophageal SCC patients who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant CRT and with pathology stage T3N0M0 and T3N1M0 (metastatic lymph nodes <2) were selected. CRM distance was reassessed and divided into three groups (group 1: CRM >1 mm, group 2: uninvolved CRM but <1 mm, group 3: CRM involved)., Results: The cohort comprised 145 male and 6 female patients with mean age of 57 years. There were 74, 51, and 26 patients in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. With median follow-up period of 50 months, LR developed in 30.5% of patients. Both group 2 and group 3 had significantly higher LR than group 1 (37 and 42% vs. 21%, P < 0.05). Meanwhile, mean time from operation to recurrence was also significantly shorter in group 2 and group 3 than in group 1 (267 and 269 days versus 402 days, P < 0.05). Five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was highest in group 1 (40%). Despite the similarity in LR, 5-year DSS significantly differed between group 2 and group 3 (22 vs. 7%, P < 0.05). The higher rate of distant recurrence (DR) and concomitant LR + DR in group 3 accounted for the survival difference., Conclusion: In ypT3 esophageal SCC patients, CRM distance provides useful information for risk stratification in cancer recurrence and survival.

Aims: To investigate the survival benefit and preoperative risk factors for hospital mortality of salvage surgery in esophageal cancer patients who had locoregional residual/recurrent tumor after definitive chemoradiotherapy., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the esophageal cancer patients who presented at our hospital from 1997 to 2004. Forty-seven patients who had squamous cell cancer and developed locoregional recurrent/persistent disease after primary definitive chemoradiotherapy were elected. Twenty-seven of them received salvage esophagectomy (group 1) and the other 20 underwent non-operative treatment only (group 2). In order to assess the surgery-related mobility and mortality in group 1, 191 patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by operation during the same time period were also enrolled (group 3)., Results: The 5-year overall survival of group 1 patients was 25.4%. In contrast, all of the patients in the group 2 died within 16.7 months. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.0029). In comparison with group 3, group 1 patients had significantly more surgery-related complications and hospital mortality. In univariate analysis for preoperative risk factors, a low albumin or hemoglobulin level was associated with high hospital mortality in group 1 (p=0.004 and 0.003, respectively). After multivariate analysis, only the low albumin level remained borderline significance. As for disease specific survival after salvage surgery, R0 resection was the only independent prognosticator (p=0.049)., Conclusion: Salvage surgery provides survival benefit in esophageal cancer patients with locoregional persistent or recurrent disease after primary definitive chemoradiotherapy. Preoperative albumin and hemoglobulin levels are associated with hospital mortality and may aid in selecting suitable patient for salvage surgery.

Purpose: The high mortality associated with esophageal perforation can be reduced by aggressive surgery and good critical care. We report our experience of treating esophageal perforation in a clinic in Taiwan., Methods: The subjects were 28 patients who underwent surgery for a benign esophageal perforation., Results: The esophageal perforation was iatrogenic in 11 patients, spontaneous in 8, and caused by foreign body injury in 9. Most (22/28) of the patients were seen longer than 24 h after perforation, and 77% had empyema preoperatively. The perforation was located in the cervical area in 5 patients and in the thoracic esophagus in 23. We performed primary repair in 24 patients, esophagectomy in 3, and drainage in 1. Leakage occurred after primary repair in ten (41%) patients, resulting in one death, and two patients died of other diseases. Postoperative leakage prolonged the hospital stay but had no impact on mortality. Overall survival was 90%. Univariate analysis revealed that age, timing of treatment, and cause and location of the perforation influenced outcome, but multivariate analysis failed to identify a predictor of mortality., Conclusions: Early diagnosis and intervention are crucial to prevent morbidity and mortality in patients with esophageal perforation. Primary repair is feasible even if the diagnosis is delayed.