1. External Validation of Pretreatment Pathological Tumor Extent in Patients with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Esophageal Cancer.
- Author
-
Brinkmann S, Noordman BJ, Hölscher AH, Biermann K, van Klaveren D, Bollschweiler E, Pütz K, van Lanschot JJB, and Drebber U
- Subjects
- Adenocarcinoma mortality, Adenocarcinoma therapy, Aged, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell mortality, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell therapy, Cohort Studies, Esophageal Neoplasms mortality, Esophageal Neoplasms therapy, Female, Humans, Lymph Nodes pathology, Lymphatic Metastasis, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, Survival Analysis, Adenocarcinoma pathology, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell pathology, Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant, Esophageal Neoplasms pathology, Esophagectomy, Neoadjuvant Therapy
- Abstract
Background: This study was conducted to validate a pretreatment (i.e. prior to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy) pathological staging system in the resection specimen after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. The study investigated the prognostic value of pretreatment pathological T and N categories (prepT and prepN categories) in both an independent and a combined patient cohort., Methods: Patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and esophagectomy between 2012 and 2015 were included. PrepT and prepN categories were estimated based on the extent of tumor regression and regressional changes of lymph nodes in the resection specimen. The difference in Akaike's information criterion (ΔAIC) was used to assess prognostic performance. PrepN and ypN categories were combined to determine the effect of nodal sterilization on prognosis. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to identify combined prepN and ypN categories as independent prognostic factors., Results: The prognostic strength of the prepT category was better than the cT and ypT categories (ΔAIC 7.7 vs. 3.0 and 2.9, respectively), and the prognostic strength of the prepN category was better than the cN category and similar to the ypN category (ΔAIC 29.2 vs. - 1.0 and 27.9, respectively). PrepN + patients who became ypN0 had significantly worse survival than prepN0 patients (2-year overall survival 69% vs. 86% in 137 patients; p = 0.044). Similar results were found in a combined cohort of 317 patients (2-year overall survival 62% vs. 85%; p = 0.002). Combined prepN/ypN stage was independently associated with overall survival., Conclusions: These results independently confirm the prognostic value of prepTNM staging. PrepTNM staging is of additional prognostic value to cTNM and ypTNM. PrepN0/ypN0 patients have a better survival than prepN +/ypN0 patients.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF