Search

Introduction: The phase 2 RAMONA study demonstrated that second-line nivolumab ± ipilimumab immunotherapy was feasible and effective in older patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). Here, we presented results from functional status (FS) and quality-of-life (QoL) analyses., Materials and Methods: Patients aged ≥65 years with advanced ESCC and disease progression following first-line therapy were enrolled for study treatment with nivolumab ± ipilimumab. Geriatric assessments (GA) consisting of G8 and GoGo/SlowGo evaluation, and quality of life (QoL) assessments with EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires were conducted at baseline and during the treatment. A post hoc analysis was performed to compare therapy efficacy, toxicity, and QoL between age groups (≥70 years vs. <70 years) and functionality groups (G8 > 14 vs. ≤14 and GoGo vs. SlowGo)., Results: In 66 treated patients with a median age of 70.5 years, older patients had non-inferior overall survival and tumor response compared to younger patients, with no increased treatment-related adverse events. Fitter patients (G8 > 14, GoGo) had a clinically, yet not statistically significant, survival advantage than less fit patients (G8 ≤ 14, SlowGo) patients. Moreover, FS by G8 and GoGo/SlowGo significantly correlated with QoL. Overall, QoL was impaired at baseline but remained stable in all scales over the course of immunotherapy., Discussion: The administration of nivolumab ± ipilimumab second-line immunotherapy in older patients with ESCC did not show age-dependent effects and maintained QoL. GA could identify functional deficits and limitations of QoL and should be implemented in the context of immunotherapy., Clinicaltrials: gov: NCT03416244., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest NMB reports research funding and receipt of equipment from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. RDH reports advisory for Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer, Daichi, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Servier; honoraria for lectures and presentations from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer, Daichi, Lilly, medac, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Saladax, Sanofi, and Servier; and consulting fees from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer, Daichi, Lilly, medac, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Saladax, Sanofi, and Servier. AV reports consultancy and advisory role for AstraZeneca, Amgen, BeiGene, Böhringer Mannheim, BMS, BTG, Daichi-Sankyo, EISAI, Incyte, Ipsen, MSD, PierreFabre, Roche, Servier, Sirtex, Tahio and Terumo. MdW reports research funding from Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca and MorphoSys; speaker's honoraria from AstraZeneca and Janssen; travel or accommodation expenses from Astellas and Janssen. RJ reports consulting fees from Roche and Bayer; payments for lectures and presentations from Dr. Falk Pharma and Bristol Myers Squibb; for writing of manuscripts from Boston Scientific and Springer Nature; advisory for Heidelberg University Hospital; and leading the Endoscopy section of the German Society of Gastroenterology. GS reports consulting fees from Servier, Pharmacosmos, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen and travel support from Daichi-Sankyo. PTP reports consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and MSD. TL is Scientific Head at CROLLL GmbH. HB is an employee of a commercial provider of clinical statistics and programming services (Staburo GmbH, Munich). MPE reports funding for conducting the trial from AIO-Studien-gGmbH which is the regulatory sponsor of the trial, and advisory for Bristol Myers Squibb. NH reports advisory for Bristol Myers Squibb. All remaining authors declare no conflicts of interests., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Purpose: This trial evaluates the addition of the PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab (ATZ) to standard-of-care fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) as a perioperative treatment for patients with resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA)., Methods: DANTE started as multicenter, randomized phase II trial, which was subsequently converted to a phase III trial. Here, we present the results of the phase II proportion, focusing on surgical pathology and safety outcomes on an exploratory basis. Patients with resectable EGA (≥cT2 or cN+) were assigned to either four preoperative and postoperative cycles of FLOT combined with ATZ, followed by eight cycles of ATZ maintenance (arm A) or FLOT alone (arm B)., Results: Two hundred ninety-five patients were randomly assigned (A, 146; B, 149) with balanced baseline characteristics between arms. Twenty-three patients (8%) had tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI), and 58% patients had tumors with a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of ≥1. Surgical morbidity (A, 45%; B, 42%) and 60-day mortality (A, 3%; B, 2%) were comparable between arms. Downstaging favored arm A versus arm B (ypT0, 23% v 15% [one-sided P = .044]; ypT0-T2, 61% v 48% [one-sided P = .015]; ypN0, 68% v 54% [one-sided P = .012]). Histopathologic complete regression rates (pathologic complete response or TRG1a) were higher after FLOT plus ATZ (A, 24%; B, 15%; one-sided P = .032), and the difference was more pronounced in the PD-L1 CPS ≥10 (A, 33%; B, 12%) and MSI (A, 63%; B, 27%) subpopulations. Complete margin-free (R0) resection rates were relatively high in both arms (A, 96%; B, 95%). The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar in both groups., Conclusion: Within the limitations of the exploratory nature of the data, the addition of ATZ to perioperative FLOT is safe and improved postoperative stage and histopathologic regression.

Introduction: In squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (ESCC), therapeutical options in 2nd-line treatment are scarce with immune checkpoint inhibition being the only approved one. Ramucirumab/paclitaxel is an approved 2nd-line treatment in metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. We assessed safety and efficacy of ramucirumab/paclitaxel for ESCC., Methods: This prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II trial evaluated paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15) plus ramucirumab (8 mg/kg days 1, 15) (investigational arm A) versus paclitaxel alone (80 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15) (standard arm B), both q4w, in advanced/metastatic ESCC refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based drugs. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) rate at 6 months., Results: From 3/2019 to 4/2021, 21/186 planned patients were included (arm A 11 patients; arm B 10 patients) in 9 German centers. Due to slow accrual, the study was terminated prematurely. OS at 6 months was 72.7% for ramucirumab/paclitaxel and 50.0% for paclitaxel. The study design did not allow statistical comparison of the arms. PFS (3.8 vs. 3.5 months), OS (12.1 vs. 9.2 months), ORR (18.2% vs. 20.0%) and DCR (54.5% vs. 60.0%) were comparable in both arms. Most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in arm A were leucopenia (54.5%), fatigue (27.3%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (18.2%). 27.3% in arm A and 50.0% in arm B had TRAEs ≥ grade 3., Conclusion: Ramucirumab/paclitaxel shows an acceptable tolerability and numerically improved OS at 6 months. Due to the small number of patients, the current trial must be considered exploratory and more data are needed in this indication., (© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: The phase III RATIONALE-302 study evaluated tislelizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, as second-line (2L) treatment for advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This prespecified exploratory analysis investigated outcomes in patients from Europe and North America (Europe/North America subgroup)., Patients and Methods: Patients with tumor progression during/after first-line systemic treatment were randomized 1 : 1 to open-label tislelizumab or investigator's choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan)., Results: The Europe/North America subgroup comprised 108 patients (tislelizumab: n = 55; chemotherapy: n = 53). Overall survival (OS) was prolonged with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy (median: 11.2 versus 6.3 months), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.55 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-0.87]; HR was similar irrespective of programmed death-ligand 1 score [≥10%: 0.47 (95% CI 0.18-1.21); <10%: 0.55 (95% CI 0.30-1.01)]. Median progression-free survival was 2.3 versus 2.7 months with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy [HR: 0.97 (95% CI 0.64-1.47)]. Overall response rate was greater with tislelizumab (20.0%) versus chemotherapy (11.3%), with more durable response (median duration of response: 5.1 versus 2.1 months). Tislelizumab had a favorable safety profile versus chemotherapy, with fewer patients experiencing ≥grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (13.0% versus 51.0%). Those on tislelizumab experienced less deterioration in health-related quality of life, physical functioning, and/or disease- and treatment-related symptoms (i.e. fatigue, pain, and eating problems) as compared to those on chemotherapy, per the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and QLQ-OES18 scores., Conclusions: As a 2L therapy for advanced/metastatic ESCC, tislelizumab improved OS and had a favorable safety profile as compared to chemotherapy in European/North American ESCC patients in the randomized phase III RATIONALE-302 study., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recurrent oesophageal cancer after the initial curative multimodality treatment is a disease condition with a poor prognosis. There is limited evidence on recurrence patterns and on the optimal therapeutic approach., Methods: We analysed the pattern of disease recurrence and subsequent therapies in patients with recurrent oesophageal cancer based on prospectively collected data within a predefined subproject of the randomised phase 3 trial Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) 75/08., Results: Among 300 patients included in the SAKK 75/08 trial, tumour recurrence was observed in 103 patients with a median follow-up of 5.8 years. Locoregional recurrence only was found in 26.2% of the patients, 21.4% of patients had both distant and locoregional recurrence and 52.4% of patients had distant recurrence only. Fifty-nine patients (58%) received at least one line of systemic therapy at recurrence, most commonly oxaliplatin-based combination therapies for adenocarcinoma and single-agent chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma. Local therapies, most commonly palliative radiotherapy, were used in 49 patients (48%). Six patients underwent a second curative resection or radiochemotherapy. We found no significant overall survival difference for isolated locoregional recurrence versus distant recurrence (15.1 versus 8.7 months, p = 0.167). In a multivariable Cox regression model, time from oesophagectomy to recurrence and the number of recurrence sites as well as the use of systemic therapy or a second curative local therapy significantly correlated with overall survival., Conclusions: Recurrent oesophageal cancer remains a disease with a poor prognosis and requires multidisciplinary management. A second curative approach for localised disease recurrence may be an option for highly selected patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The new era of immunotherapy is successfully implemented in the treatment of metastatic/locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGAC), as it has been investigated in combinations with/without chemotherapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2)-positive and Her2-negative tumors. Recent approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) enrich the therapeutic landscape in nearly every therapeutic line. Based on CHECKMATE-649, the combination of nivolumab and chemotherapy in first-line therapy of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-L1)-positive patients with advanced gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC), esophageal cancer (EC), and gastric cancer (GC) was approved in Europe for PD-L1 combined positivity score (CPS) ≥ 5 patients and independently from PD-L1 score in the USA and Asia. Based on KEYNOTE-590, patients with advanced GEJC and EC qualify for the combination of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in Europe (CPS ≥ 10) and the USA. For Her2-positive patients, trastuzumab with first-line chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab has beneficial response rates and resulted in approval in the USA (KEYNOTE-811). In third-line therapy, superior overall survival (OS) was achieved by the administration of nivolumab (approval in Japan, ATTRACTION-02), and pembrolizumab shows a positive effect on the duration of response (KEYNOTE-059). Questions of resistance to immunotherapy or the role of gender in response to ICI need to be clarified. This review provides an overview of the current approvals of ICI in advanced EGAC and reflects results of relevant phase II/III trials with focus on possible biomarkers, including PD-L1 CPS and microsatellite-instability (MSI) status., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: M.M. advisory roles for BMS, MSD, Merck, Amgen, BeiGene, Novartis, Lilly, Macrogenics, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, and Taiho. A.H. was a member of the advisory board of BMS. A.D. Wagner: Consultant or advisory role: Merck, Lilly, Pierre Fabre Pharma, Sanofi, Daichii Sankyo, Dragon-Fly Therapeutics, Servier, BMS, Astellas. I am coordinating investigator of EORTC-TRIAL 1203, which is supported by an educational grant from Roche to EORTC. R.O.: reports personal fees from BMS, Servier, Merck, Merck KGaA and a research grant from Roche (institutional). M.A.: Maria Alsina reports financial interest in form of scientific consultancy role for Amgen, BMS, MSD, Lilly and Servier. P.T-P.: Honoraria for advisory role: Astellas, BMS, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Nordic, Pfizer, Roche, Teva, Research Grants: Merck, GSK, Novartis. H.v.L: Consultant or advisory role: BMS, Dragonfly, Lilly, Merck, Nordic Pharma, Servier. Research funding and/or medication supply: Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Incyte, Lilly, Merck, Nordic Pharma, Philips, Roche, Servier., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The overall survival of patients with advanced and refractory oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, mostly aged 65 years and older, is poor. Treatment with PD-1 antibodies showed improved progression-free survival and overall survival. We assessed the safety and efficacy of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy in this population., Methods: This multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial done in 32 sites in Germany included patients aged 65 years and older with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and disease progression or recurrence following first-line therapy. Patients were treated with nivolumab (240 mg fixed dose once every 2 weeks, intravenously) in the safety run-in phase and continued with nivolumab and ipilimumab (nivolumab 240 mg fixed dose once every 2 weeks and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks, intravenously). The primary endpoint was overall survival, which was compared with a historical cohort receiving standard chemotherapy in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03416244., Findings: Between March 2, 2018, and Aug 20, 2020, we screened 75 patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. We enrolled 66 patients (50 [76%] men and 16 [24%] women; median age 70·5 years [IQR 67·0-76·0]), 44 (67%) of whom received combined nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy and 22 (33%) received nivolumab alone. Median overall survival time at the prespecified data cutoff was 7·2 months (95% CI 5·7-12·4) and significantly higher than in a historical cohort receiving standard chemotherapy (p=0·0063). The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (12 [29%] of 42), nausea (11 [26%]), and diarrhoea (ten [24%]). Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 13 (20%) of 66 patients. Treatment-related death occurred in one patient with bronchiolitis obliterans while on nivolumab and ipilimumab treatment., Interpretation: Patients aged at least 65 years, with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma might benefit from combined nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy in second-line treatment., Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MPE reports receiving funding to conduct the trial from AIO Studien, the regulatory sponsor of the trial, and serving as an advisor with Bristol Myers Squibb. NMB reports receiving research funding and receipt of equipment from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. RH reports serving as an advisor with Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer, Daichi, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Servier; honoraria for lectures and presentations from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer, Daichi, Lilly, medac, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Saladax, Sanofi, and Servier; and consulting fees from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer, Daichi, Lilly, medac, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Saladax, Sanofi, and Servier. AV reports serving as an advisor with Roche, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Eisai, AstraZeneca, IPSEN, MSD, Sirtex, BTG, Servier, Terumo, and Imaging Equipment; and consulting fees and honoraria for lectures from Roche, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Eisai, Astra Zeneca, IPSEN, MSD, Sirtex, BTG, Servier, Terumo, and Imaging Equipment. RJ reports receiving consulting fees from Roche and Bayer; payments for lectures and presentations from Dr Falk Pharma and Bristol Myers Squibb; for writing of manuscripts from Boston Scientific and Springer Nature; serving as an advisor with Heidelberg University Hospital; and leading the Endoscopy section of the German Society of Gastroenterology. PTP reports receiving consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and MSD. TGa reports receiving honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, and Roche for presentations and advisory functions. JNK reports receiving consulting fees from Owkin and Panakeia as well as honoraria for lectures from MSD and Eisai. MM reports employment with AIO Studien, who was the regulatory sponsor of the trial. NH reports serving as an advisor with Bristol Myers Squibb. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Trifluridine and tipiracil (FTD/TPI) demonstrated survival benefit vs placebo and manageable safety in previously treated patients with metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (mGC/GEJC) in the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 TAGS study. This subgroup analysis of TAGS examined efficacy/safety outcomes by age., Methods: In TAGS, patients with mGC/GEJC and ≥ 2 prior therapies were randomized (2:1) to receive FTD/TPI 35 mg/m 2 or placebo, plus best supportive care. A preplanned subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes in patients aged < 65, ≥ 65, and ≥ 75 years., Results: Among 507 randomized patients (n = 337 FTD/TPI; n = 170 placebo), 55%, 45%, and 14% were aged < 65, ≥ 65, and ≥ 75 years, respectively. Overall survival hazard ratios for FTD/TPI vs placebo were 0.67 (95% CI 0.51-0.89), 0.73 (95% CI 0.52-1.02), and 0.67 (95% CI 0.33-1.37) in patients aged < 65, ≥ 65, and ≥ 75 years, respectively. Regardless of age, patients receiving FTD/TPI experienced improved progression-free survival and stayed longer on treatment than those receiving placebo. Among FTD/TPI-treated patients, frequencies of any-cause grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were similar across age subgroups (80% each), although grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was more frequent in older patients [40% (≥ 65 and ≥ 75 years); 29% (< 65 years)]; AE-related discontinuation rates did not increase with age [14% (< 65 years), 12% (≥ 65 years), and 12% (≥ 75 years)]., Conclusions: The results of this subgroup analysis show the efficacy and tolerability of FTD/TPI treatment regardless of age in patients with mGC/GEJC who had received 2 or more prior treatments., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Treatment of esophageal carcinoma has changed dramatically following several landmark trials, which have proven the benefit of immunotherapy. The selective PD-1 (programmed cell death ligand-1)-inhibitor nivolumab has been shown to improve DFS in the adjuvant therapy setting (CheckMate-577). In the first-line treatment, PD-L1 positive (CPS ≥ 10) squamous cell carcinoma patients (pts) have been shown to have an increased OS following treatment with the PD-1-inhibitor pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-590). Nivolumab also improved overall survival in the first line setting either combined with ipilimumab or with chemotherapy (CheckMate 648) compared to chemotherapy alone. In Asian first-line patients, phase III trials investigating camrelizumab (ESCORT 1), toripalimab (JUPITER 06), or sintilimab (ORIENT 15) in addition to chemotherapy also showed significant survival benefits. In the second-line setting, monotherapy with nivolumab (ATTRACTION-03), pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-181), camrelizumab (ESCORT), and tislelizumab (RATIONALE 302) demonstrated a benefit in OS in comparison to chemotherapy. Here we will review these trials and integrate them into the current treatment algorithm.

Perioperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT) is a mainstay in the treatment of esophagogastric adenocarcinomas (EGA). Trastuzumab improved survival when added to chemotherapy in patients with HER-2-positive metastatic EGA. We investigated the combination of trastuzumab and FLOT as perioperative treatment in patients with locally advanced EGA. A multicenter phase II study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of perioperative FLOT (24-hours 5-FU 2600 mg/m 2 , leucovorin 200 mg/m 2 , oxaliplatin 85 mg/mg 2 , docetaxel 50 mg/m 2 , trastuzumab 6 mg/kg then 4 mg/kg d1, repeated d15 for four cycles preoperatively and postoperatively followed by 9 cycles of trastuzumab monotherapy) in patients with HER-2 positive EGA. Patients had ≥cT2, any N, M0 EGA. The primary endpoint was the rate of centrally assessed pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints comprised disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS), R0 resection rate, toxicity and surgical morbidity. Fifty-six evaluable patients (median age 62 years) were included; n = 40 had tumors originating from the esophagogastric junction; T stage was (cT2/3/4/unknown): 4/42/8/2; n = 50 patients had cN+ disease. Main adverse events grades 3-4: leukopenia (17.9%), neutropenia (46.6%) and diarrhea (17.0%). All patients underwent tumor resections. R0 resection rate was 92.9%. Eight patients had anastomotic leakage. One postoperative death occurred. pCR was found in 12 patients (21.4%) and a further n = 14 patients (25.0%) had near complete response. Median DFS was 42.5 months and the 3-year OS rate was 82.1%. The primary endpoint of achieving a pCR >20% was reached. No unexpected safety issues were observed. Survival data are promising., (© 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.)

Purpose: Pembrolizumab demonstrated efficacy in PD-L1-positive [combined positive score (CPS) ≥1] advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer in the first-, second-, and third-line setting in KEYNOTE-062, KEYNOTE-061, and KEYNOTE-059, respectively. To better delineate the specificity of CPS as a predictor of clinical outcomes, we analyzed pembrolizumab efficacy in patients with CPS ≥ 10 in these trials., Patients and Methods: Included were patients with CPS ≥ 10 tumors from KEYNOTE-059 cohort 1 (pembrolizumab, n = 46; post hoc ), KEYNOTE-061 (pembrolizumab, n = 53; chemotherapy, n = 55; post hoc ), and KEYNOTE-062 (pembrolizumab, n = 92; chemotherapy, n = 90; primary). Efficacy outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR)., Results: In KEYNOTE-059, median follow-up was 6 months, median OS was 8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.8-11.1], ORR was 17%, and median (range) DOR was 21 months (3+ to 35+). In KEYNOTE-061, median follow-up was 9 months, median OS (pembrolizumab vs. chemotherapy) was 10 versus 8 months (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41-1.02), median PFS was 3 months versus 3 months (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.56-1.33), ORR was 25% versus 9%, and median (range) DOR was not reached (4 to 26+ months) versus 7 months (3-7). In KEYNOTE-062, median follow-up was 11 months, median OS (pembrolizumab vs. chemotherapy) was 17 months versus 11 months (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.97), median PFS was 3 months versus 6 months (HR, 1.09, 95% CI; 0.79-1.49), ORR was 25% versus 38%, and median (range) DOR was 19 months (1+ to 34+) versus 7 months (2+ to 30+)., Conclusions: This comprehensive analysis showed consistent improvements toward more favorable clinical outcomes with pembrolizumab across lines of therapy in patients with CPS ≥ 10 G/GEJ cancer., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA) currently represents a main cause of cancer related death. Despite an intensified treatment for locally advanced or metastatic EGA with a doublet chemotherapy consisting of a platinum compound and a fluoropyrimidine in combination with trastuzumab for HER2-positive disease or in selected cases with docetaxel, survival remains poor. Recently, immune-oncology based strategies relevantly improved the treatment of different solid tumors and showed some promise in late or later stage trials in EGA. Notably, the combination of immunotherapy with trastuzumab to enhance anti-tumor immunity through activation of innate and adaptive immunity was beneficial in preclinical studies or clinical studies in breast cancer., Methods: The INTEGA study is an open-label, randomized, multicenter, exploratory phase II trial designed to assess clinical performance, safety and tolerability of ipilimumab or 5-FU/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in combination with nivolumab and trastuzumab in patients with previously untreated HER2-positive, locally advanced or metastatic EGA. The primary objective is to determine the clinical performance of ipilimumab or FOLFOX in combination with nivolumab and trastuzumab in terms of overall survival. Secondary objectives are safety and tolerability, efficacy in terms of progression-free survival and objective response rate and blood-based signatures (e.g. immune response or suppression of anti-HER2 resistance) that may correlate with treatment response., Discussion: Recent evidence from the phase II NCT02954536 study (oxaliplatin, capecitabine, trastuzumab and pembrolizumab) suggests the clinical feasibility of combining chemotherapy, trastuzumab and checkpoint inhibition in EGA. However, evidence for a chemotherapy-free regimen is also mounting in HER2-positive disease (NCT02689284) i.e. margetuximab and Pembrolizumab. Both studies excelled with high overall response rates and manageable toxicities. The INTEGA study aims to comparatively assess these results and select a promising new 1st line regimen which then needs to be confirmed in a randomized phase III trial. Further, the translational part of the study might help to better stratify patients and tailor treatment of either arm., Trial Registration: NCT03409848 24.01.2018.

Background: High rates of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), mainly in advanced disease, are reported for patients with cancer of the upper gastrointestinal tract (stomach, pancreas) and for treatment with cisplatin., Methods: Exploratory analysis of VTEs reported as adverse events and serious adverse events in a prospective, randomised, multicentre, multimodal phase III trial according to VTEs reported as adverse events and severe adverse events. Patients with resectable oesophageal cancer (T2N1-3, T3-4aNx) were randomized to 2 cycles of chemotherapy with docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 , cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 followed by chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) and subsequent surgery (control arm) or the same treatment with addition of cetuximab (investigational arm)., Results: VTEs occurred in 26 of 300 patients included in the trial, resulting in an incidence rate (IR) of 8.7% [95% CI 5.7-12.4%]. A total of 29 VTEs were reported:13 (45%) VTEs were grade 2, 13 (45%) grade 3 and three (10%) fatal grade 5 events. 72% (21/29) of all VTEs occurred preoperatively (IR 6.7%): 14% (4/29) during chemotherapy and 59% (17/29) during CRT. In multivariable logistic regression only adenocarcinoma (IR 11.1%, 21/189 patients) compared to squamous cell cancer (IR 4.5%, 5/111 patients) was significantly associated with VTE-risk during treatment, OR 2.9 [95%CI 1.0-8.4], p = 0.046. Baseline Khorana risk score was 0 in 73% (19/26), 1-2 in 23% (6/26) and 3 in only 4% (1/26) of patients with VTEs., Conclusion: A high incidence of VTEs during preoperative therapy of resectable oesophageal cancer is observed in this analysis, especially in patients with adenocarcinoma. The role of prophylactic anticoagulation during neoadjuvant therapy in resectable esophageal cancer should be further evaluated in prospective clinical trials. According to our data, which are in line with other analysis of VTE-risk in patients with oesophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy and CRT, prophylactic anticoagluation could be considered balanced against individual bleeding risks, especially in patients with adenocarcinoma. In addition to the established risk factors, oesophageal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant cisplatin-based therapy may be regarded as a high-risk situation for VTEs., Trial Registration: Registered at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01107639, on 21 April 2010.

Background: Palliative chemotherapy of advanced oesophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) consists of cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (CF) to target epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with panitumumab (P); chemotherapy enhanced overall survival (OS) in advanced colorectal or squamous cell head and neck cancers. With prospective serum and tumour biomarkers, we tested if P added to CF (CFP) improved OS in advanced ESCC., Patients and Methods: Eligible patients with confirmed ESCC that was not curatively resectable or did not qualify for definitive radiochemotherapy, were randomised 1 : 1 to receive CF [cisplatin (C) 100 mg/m 2 i.v., day 1; 5-fluorouracil (F) 1000 mg/m 2 i.v., days 1-4] or CF plus P (9 mg/kg, i.v., day 1, each q3-week cycle) until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Safety was reviewed by the Data Safety Monitoring Board after 40, 70 and 100 patients who completed at least one cycle. After 53 enrolled patients, cisplatin was reduced from 100 mg/m 2 to 80 mg/m 2 ., Results: The trial was stopped early based on interim efficacy results triggered by the third safety analysis: median OS (mOS) favoured CF over CFP, regardless of cisplatin dose [hazard ratio (HR) 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-2.98; P = 0.028]. In the final analysis, mOS was 10.2 versus 9.4 months for CF versus CFP, respectively (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.79-1.75; P = 0.43). One hundred (70.4%) of 142 patients in the safety population died, 51 (51.0%) with CFP. Most deaths were related to disease progression [44/49 (90%) deaths in CF versus 34/51 (67%) deaths in CFP]; objective responses [27/73 (37.0%)] were identical. The most common serious adverse events were kidney injury [3 (4.3%) versus 7 (9.7%)], general health deterioration [5 (7.1%) versus 5 (6.9%)] and dysphagia [4 (5.7%) versus 4 (5.6%)] in CF versus CFP, respectively. There were three (4.3%) and 17 (23.6%) common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade 5 events in CF versus CFP, respectively. Low soluble (s)EGFR levels were associated with better progression-free survival; sEGFR was induced under CFP., Conclusion: EGFR inhibition added to CF did not improve survival in unselected advanced ESCC patients. The results support further liquid biopsy studies., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01627379) and EudraCT (2010-020606-15)., (Copyright © 2019 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is physiologically confined to gastric mucosa tight junctions; however, upon malignant transformation, perturbations in cell polarity lead to CLDN18.2 epitopes being exposed on the cancer cell surface. The first-in-class monoclonal antibody, zolbetuximab (formerly known as IMAB362), binds to CLDN18.2 and can induce immune-mediated lysis of CLDN18.2-positive cells., Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ) or oesophageal adenocarcinomas with moderate-to-strong CLDN18.2 expression in ≥50% of tumour cells received zolbetuximab intravenously every 2 weeks for five planned infusions. At least three patients were enrolled in two sequential cohorts (cohort 1300 mg/m2; cohort 2600 mg/m2); additional patients were enrolled into a dose-expansion cohort (cohort 3600 mg/m2). The primary end point was the objective response rate [ORR: complete and partial response (PR)]; secondary end points included clinical benefit [ORR+stable disease (SD)], progression-free survival, safety/tolerability, and zolbetuximab pharmacokinetic profile., Results: From September 2010 to September 2012, 54 patients were enrolled (cohort 1, n = 4; cohort 2, n = 6; cohort 3, n = 44). Three patients in cohort 1 and 25 patients in cohorts 2/3 received at least 5 infusions. Antitumour activity data were available for 43 patients, of whom 4 achieved PR (ORR 9%) and 6 (14%) had SD for a clinical benefit rate of 23%. In a subgroup of patients with moderate-to-high CLDN18.2 expression in ≥70% of tumour cells, ORR was 14% (n = 4/29). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 81.5% (n = 44/54) patients; nausea (61%), vomiting (50%), and fatigue (22%) were the most frequent., Conclusions: Zolbetuximab monotherapy was well tolerated and exhibited antitumour activity in patients with CLDN18.2-positive advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinomas, with response rates similar to those reported for single-agent targeted agents in gastric/GEJ cancer trials., Clinicaltrials.gov Number: NCT01197885., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Background: 10-20% of patients with gastric cancer (GC) have HER2+ tumors. Addition of trastuzumab (T) to cisplatin/fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (CT) improved survival in metastatic, HER2+ GC. When pertuzumab (P) was added to neoadjuvant T and CT, a significant increase in histopathological complete response rate was observed in HER2+ breast cancer. This study aims to investigate the added benefit of using both HER2 targeting drugs (T alone or the combination of T + P), in combination with perioperative CT for localized HER2+ GC., Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, phase II trial. HER2 status from patients with resectable GC (UICC TNM7 tumor stage Ib-III) will be centrally determined. Two hundred and-fifteen patients from 52 sites in 14 countries will be centrally randomized (1:2:2 ratio) to one of the following treatment arms: 1. Standard: CT alone. CT regimens will be FLOT (5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, taxotere) CapOx (capecitabine, oxaliplatin) or FOLFOX (5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) according to investigator's choice in Europe, and cisplatin/capecitabine in Asia. 2. Experimental arm 1: CT as in control group, plus T (8 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) at day 1, independent of CT chosen for 3 cycles of 3 weeks before and after surgery. 3. Experimental arm 2: CT plus T as in experimental arm 1, plus P (840 mg every 3 weeks) on day 1. Adjuvant treatment with T or T + P will continue for 17 cycles in total. Stratification factors are: histology (intestinal/non-intestinal); region (Asia vs Europe); location (GEJ vs non-GEJ); HER2 immunohistochemistry score (IHC 3+ vs IHC 2+/FISH+) and chemotherapy regimen. Primary objective is to detect an increase in the major pathological response rate from 25 to 45% either with CT plus T alone, or with CT plus the combination of T and P., Discussion: Depending on the results of the INNOVATION trial, the addition of HER2 targeted treatment with either T or T and P to CT may inform future study designs or become a standard in the perioperative management HER2+ GC., Trial Registration: This article reports a health care intervention on human participants and was registered on July 10, 2014 under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02205047 ; EudraCT: 2014-000722-38.

Background: This open-label, phase III trial compared chemoradiation followed by surgery with or without neoadjuvant and adjuvant cetuximab in patients with resectable esophageal carcinoma., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to two cycles of chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m2, cisplatin 75 mg/m2) followed by chemoradiation (45 Gy, docetaxel 20 mg/m2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2, weekly for 5 weeks) and surgery, with or without neoadjuvant cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly and adjuvant cetuximab 500 mg/m2 fortnightly for 3 months. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: In total, 300 patients (median age, 61 years; 88% male; 63% adenocarcinoma; 85% cT3/4a, 90% cN+) were assigned to cetuximab (n = 149) or control (n = 151). The R0-resection rate was 95% for cetuximab versus 97% for control. Postoperative treatment-related mortality was 6% in both arms. Median PFS was 2.9 years [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.0 to not reached] with cetuximab and 2.0 years (95% CI, 1.5-2.8) with control [hazard ratio (HR), 0.79; 95% CI, 0.58-1.07; P = 0.13]. Median overall survival (OS) time was 5.1 years (95% CI, 3.7 to not reached) versus 3.0 years (95% CI, 2.2-4.2) for cetuximab and control, respectively (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52-1.01; P = 0.055). Time to loco-regional failure after R0-resection was significantly longer for cetuximab (HR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31-0.90; P = 0.017); time to distant failure did not differ between arms (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.64-1.59, P = 0.97). Cetuximab did not increase adverse events in neoadjuvant or postoperative settings., Conclusion: Adding cetuximab to multimodal therapy significantly improved loco-regional control, and led to clinically relevant, but not-significant improvements in PFS and OS in resectable esophageal carcinoma., Clinical Trial Information: NCT01107639.

Background: Perioperative chemotherapy significantly improves survival in patients with locally advanced oesophagogastric cancer (EGC). However, as approximately 60% of patients will die from their disease, new therapeutic agents such as molecular-targeted drugs are needed., Patients and Methods: To evaluate the role of panitumumab with perioperative chemotherapy, previously untreated patients with locally advanced EGC received, in an open-label randomised phase II study (NEOPECX), standard epirubicin, cisplatin, capecitabine (ECX) chemotherapy with or without panitumumab. The primary end-point was the histological response rate after neoadjuvant therapy. The expression status and gene copy number of EGFR, HER2, and MET were determined by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Plasma samples were collected before the first cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy., Results: Overall, 160 patients (80 versus 80) were eligible. The majority (82% versus 80%) showed lymph node involvement. Rate of R0-resection, percentage of patients with downstaging to ypT0-2 at pathohistological evaluation, and rate of major histological response was equal in both arms. Toxicity was increased by panitumumab with regard to thromboembolic events and skin toxicity. Patients with tumour EGFR, HER2 or MET expression had shorter progression-free and overall survival. FISH positivity for these markers was associated with shorter survival independent of therapy. High levels of soluble EGFR in particular predicted poor survival in the panitumumab arm., Conclusion: The addition of panitumumab to ECX did not improve downstaging of locally advanced EGC. Low plasma levels of pathway-associated proteins such as sEGFR may identify a group of patients that benefit from EGFR-directed therapy. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01234324., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCTx) improves survival outcomes of patients with localised esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA). This analysis evaluates the predictive value of histopathological response after neoCTx., Methods: A total of 461 patients with locally advanced EGA (≥T2 and/or N+) who received neoCTx followed by surgery were analysed: 314 (68.1%) with intestinal, 94 (20.4%) with diffuse and 53 (11.5%) with mixed histological type according to Lauren classification. Histopathological response evaluation was available for 363 patients and performed locally. This analysis evaluates the predictive value of histopathological subtype on histopathological response after neoCTx. Response was correlated with survival., Results: Median patients' age was 63 years, 79.8% were male. Tumours were localised in the stomach in 32.5% and EG junction in 67.5% of the patients. With a median follow-up of 49.4 months, median disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 38.0 and 66.4 months, respectively. Pathological complete response (TRG1a) was 8.8% and combined complete and subtotal regression (TRG1a/b) was 27.3% for all patients. Around 9.2% of patients with intestinal type had a TRG1a compared with 6.2% with diffuse and 10.8% with mixed type. TRG1a/b rate was higher in intestinal (31.0%) than in diffuse (15.4%) and in mixed type (21.6%). For patients with intestinal type, 3-year DFS was 78.4% with TRG1a and 54.3% with other regression grades (p = 0.031). All patients with diffuse and mixed type and TRG1a were disease free after 3 years compared with 31.1% (p = 0.056) and 47.7% (p = 0.044) with other regression grades., Conclusion: Histopathological subtype is predictive for histopathological response and outcome after neoCTx, with the highest response rates in intestinal differentiated EGA., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

After surgical treatment of cancer of the esophagus or the esophagogastric junction we observed steatorrhea, which is so far seldom reported. We analyzed all patients treated in our rehabilitation clinic between 2011 and 2014 and focused on the impact of surgery on digestion of fat. Reported steatorrhea was anamnestic, no pancreatic function test was made. Here we show the results from 51 patients. Twenty-three (45%) of the patients reported steatorrhea. Assuming decreased pancreatic function pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) was started or modified during the rehabilitation stay (in the following called STEA + ). These patients were compared with the patients without steatorrhea and without PERT (STEA - ). Maximum weight loss between surgery and rehabilitation start was 18 kg in STEA + patient and 15.3 kg in STEA - patients. STEA + patients gained more weight under PERT during the rehabilitation phase (3 wk) than STEA - patients without PERT (+1.0 kg vs. -0.3 kg, P = 0.032). We report for the first time, that patients after cancer related esophageal surgery show anamnestic signs of exocrine pancreas insufficiency and need PERT to gain body weight.

Background: Second-line chemotherapy treatment of patients with relapsed gastric and oesophageal cancers in comparison with supportive care (SC) alone has been supported by recent phase 3 clinical trials, but a meta-analysis of patient-level data is lacking., Methods: We searched Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the Web of Science for phase 3 clinical trials that compared second-line chemotherapy with SC alone for gastric and oesophageal cancers. A meta-analysis of the comprehensive patient-level data from the three identified trials was performed., Results: A total of 410 patients with gastric (n=301), gastroesophageal junction (n=76), or oesophageal (n=33) adenocarcinoma were identified. In all, 154 patients received single-agent docetaxel and 84 patients received single-agent irinotecan, each with SC. SC alone was given to 172 patients. Chemotherapy significantly reduced the risk of death (hazard ratio (HR)=0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.51-0.77, P<0.0001). This effect was observed for treatment with docetaxel (HR=0.71, 95% CI=0.56-0.89, P=0.003) and irinotecan (HR=0.49, 95% CI=0.36-0.67, P<0.001). Overall survival (OS) benefit was greatest for patients who progressed 3-6 months following first-line chemotherapy (HR=0.39, 95% CI=0.26-0.59, P<0.0001). Performance status (PS) 0-1 compared with PS 2 (HR=0.66, 95% CI=0.46-0.94, P=0.02), locally advanced disease compared with metastatic disease (HR=0.41, 95% CI=0.25-0.67, P=0.0004) and older age (HR=0.94 per 5 years, 95% CI=0.90-0.99, P=0.01) were significant predictors of improved OS. Progression of disease during first-line treatment (HR=1.24, 95% CI=0.96-1.59) or within the first 3 months of completion of first-line treatment (HR=1.42, 95% CI=1.09-1.83) were predictors of an increased risk of death compared with progression between 3 and 6 months (P=0.03). Health-related quality of life outcomes were reported in only one of the three trials, precluding meta-analysis of these parameters., Conclusions: This meta-analysis of patient-level data confirms that second-line chemotherapy treatment results in significantly better OS compared with SC alone in patients with platinum and fluoropyrimidine refractory gastric and oesphageal adenocarcinoma. Health-related quality of life outcomes should be included in future trials in this setting.

Introduction: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification is present in a subgroup of gastroo-esophageal cancers (GCs). HER2 inhibition with trastuzumab has shown to improve outcomes in advanced disease. Lapatinib ditosylate (LAP), a dual anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anti-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor with preclinical activity against GC, has been approved in HER2-positive breast cancer. We aimed to study the activity of LAP in HER2-amplified GC., Materials and Methods: Patients (pts) with HER2-positive (gene amplification or increased copy numbers based on predefined criteria) advanced GC were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive LAP 1250mg per day 1-21 plus capecitabine (CAP) 2000mg/m(2) on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle or LAP 1500mg monotherapy day 1-21 after having failed on a platinum-based first-line therapy. HER2 status was assessed centrally. The primary end-point was the objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1). We aimed to include 38 pts per arm to show an interesting response rate of ⩾20% in either of the two arms., Results: 37 pts were enrolled (18 to LAP+CAP, 19 to LAP). Pts had received a median of three prior treatment lines. 12 pts in the LAP+CAP group (67%) and 12 pts in the LAP group (63%) had received prior trastuzumab. Only two pts (11.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.37-34.7), both in the LAP+CAP arm, achieved an objective response. The study was closed prematurely for futility. Median time to progression was 42 (95% CI: 38-61) days in the LAP group and 83 (95% CI: 42-86) days in the LAP+CAP group. Other secondary efficacy end-points (progression-free and overall survival) were comparable in the two treatment groups. Rates of diarrhoea were higher with LAP+CAP (61%; 95% CI: 35-83) compared to 26% (95% CI 9-51) with LAP mono, whereas other adverse events were mostly similar between the groups (18 [100%] versus 17 [90%])., Discussion: Lapatinib showed insufficient activity in HER2-amplified pretreated advanced GC. The safety profile of LAP or LAP+CAP was as expected with some more toxicity in the combination arm. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT01145404)., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of pathologic complete response (pCR) on outcome in patients with gastric or esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant docetaxel/platin/fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: Patients received at least one cycle of chemotherapy for potentially operable disease. Pretreatment clinicopathologic factors and pCR were investigated. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and tumor-related death were correlated with pCR., Results: One hundred twenty patients were included in this analysis. Eighteen patients (15%) achieved a pCR. Tumor localization in the EGJ was identified as the only significant predictor of pCR (P = 0.019). Median follow-up was 41.1 months. Median DFS and OS for all patients were 24.1 and 48.6 months, respectively. Median DFS for patients with a pCR was not reached versus 22.1 months non-pCR patients (hazard ratio, HR 0.38; 3-year DFS: 71.8% and 37.7%, respectively, P = 0.018). While OS was not significantly different, the risk for tumor-related death was significantly lower for pCR patients compared with non-pCR patients (3-year cumulative incidences of 6.4% and 45.4%, respectively, P = 0.009)., Conclusion: A pCR following preoperative docetaxel/platin/fluoropyrimidine indicates favorable outcome in patients with gastric or EGJ adenocarcinoma. Tumor location in the EGJ is associated with a higher pCR rate.

Background: This retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with hepatic metastases from gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma who were treated with computed tomography-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT)., Patients and Methods: Eight patients with a total number of 12 isolated hepatic metastases from histologically-proven adenocarcinoma of the lower oesophagus or stomach, were treated with CT-HDRBT. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed 6 and 12 weeks after CT-HDRBT and then every 3 months to evaluate treatment efficacy., Results: The median follow-up time was 6.1±6.8 months. Lesion size ranged from 14 to 68 mm in diameter with a median of 46±21 mm. No patient developed a local recurrence. Five patients developed systemic progression after a median time of 3.7±3.6 months (three in the liver, one in liver and bone and one in liver and resection margin from gastrectomy). One patient died 3.4 months after CT-HDRBR because of liver progression with cholestasis. No major complications associated with the treatment occurred., Conclusion: CT-HDRBT might be a feasible alternative to surgical resection of liver metastases from gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma in selected patients and seems to have similar outcome rates as surgical resection in our small collective.

Background: This prospective multicentre phase II trial assessed the feasibility and efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and capecitabine (DCX) in patients with gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma., Methods: Patients with curatively resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach, the gastro-oesophageal junction or the lower third of the oesophagus were enrolled. Patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) (day 1), followed by oral capecitabine 1875 mg/m(2) divided into two doses (days 1-14) every 3 weeks. There were three cycles preoperatively and three cycles postoperatively. The primary end point was the R0 resection rate., Results: Fifty-one patients were recruited and assessed for feasibility and efficacy. 94.1% of patients received all three planned cycles preoperatively, and 52.9% received three cycles postoperatively. The R0 resection rate was 90.2%. 13.7% of patients showed complete pathological remission (pCR). Toxicity was acceptably tolerable. Without prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration, neutropenic fever developed in 21.5% of patients preoperatively (grade 3 or 4) and in 11.1% of patients postoperatively., Conclusions: DCX is a safe and feasible perioperative regimen in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma with a high percentage of cycles delivered pre- and postoperatively, compared with standard practice. The high efficacy in terms of R0 resection rate and pCR is very promising.

Background: This study assessed the activity of the mAb cetuximab in combination with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma., Patients and Methods: For a maximum of six 29-day cycles, patients received cisplatin 100 mg/m(2), day 1, plus 5-FU 1000 mg/m(2), days 1-5 (CF), either alone or in combination with cetuximab (CET-CF; 400 mg/m(2) initial dose followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly thereafter). The primary end point was tumor response. Tumor material was obtained for analysis of KRAS mutation status., Results: Sixty-two eligible patients were included, 32 receiving CET-CF and 30 CF. Cetuximab did not exacerbate grade 3/4 toxicity, except for rash (6% versus 0%) and diarrhea (16% versus 0%). The overall response rate according to RECIST criteria was 19% and 13% and the disease control rate 75% and 57% for the CET-CF and CF arms, respectively. With a median follow-up of 21.5 months, the median progression-free survival was 5.9 and 3.6 months and median overall survival 9.5 and 5.5 months for CET-CF and CF, respectively. No KRAS codon 12/13 tumor mutations were identified in 37 evaluated samples., Conclusion: Cetuximab can be safely combined with CF chemotherapy and may increase the efficacy of standard CF chemotherapy.

Introduction: Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) is a particular tumour entity because two substantially different surgical procedures are required according to the location. There is no difference in long-term prognosis between the tumour types in spite of the different surgical procedures. We were interested to evaluate the clinical and pathological prognostic factors of the AEGs which were operated in our department., Patients and Methods: 108 patients were operated for AEG between 1.1.2000 and 1.4.2006 in our institution. 32 (29.6 %) patients with distal esophageal cancer (type I according to Siewert) underwent a transthoracic esophagectomy with gastric pull-up and two-field lymphadenectomy. 57 (52.8 %) patients with type II and 19 (17.6 %) patients with type III cancers received an extended gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. The retrospective analysis was focused on clinical and pathological parameters. Possible differences between the tumour types were also evaluated. Median follow-up was 11.4 months (range: 1-57 months)., Results: Follow-up data were complete for 107 patients. A median survival of 17.4 +/- 3.25 months and a cumulative survival of 30 % were independent of the tumour location and the surgical procedure. Overall hospital mortality was 3.7 %. The univariate analysis showed that survival was significantly associated with the T category, lymph node status, lymphangio- and angioinvasion and tumour grading. In the multivariate analysis, only lymph node status was identified as an independent prognosis factor for survival. Where-as the R status was not a prognostic factor per se, how-ever, patients with an R0 situation without lymphangio- and angioinvasion had a significantly better survival compared to all other patients (p = 0.001). An increased angioinvasion rate was observed in type III tumours (52.6 %) in comparison to type I (21.9 %) and type II (21.1 %) tumours., Conclusion: The prognostic factors of our patients determined substantially the prognosis of the patients. Patients with lymph- or haemangioinvasion should regarded as high-risk patients independent of the R status. Close oncological follow-up including potential adjuvant treatment in these patients is recommended., ((c) Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart-New York.)

Precise classification of cancers of the esophagogastric junction according to Siewert may be difficult for the presence of Barrett's esophagus or hiatal hernia, which subsequently leads to a difficult choice of the surgical procedure of esophagectomy or gastrectomy. Ninety-six patients with such cancers were operated on in our department in 7 years. Twenty-nine patients (30.2%), classified as type I (group 1), underwent a transthoracic esophagectomy with gastric pull up. Sixty-seven patients (69.8%) classified as type II or III (group 2) underwent an extended gastrectomy. We compared the patients of both groups retrospectively for disease-free survival and postoperative complications. The general performance status of most patients was comparable in both groups and was assigned to the American Society of Anesthesiologists class II or III. Statistically significant differences between the groups were seen for the postoperative reintubation rate [group 1: 31.0% vs. group 2: 9.0% (P = 0.009)], median time for surgery [group 1: 6 (3.5-8.5) hours vs. group 2: 4.7 (2.2-11.5) hours (P = 0.001)], time in the intensive care unit [group 1: 6 (3-85) days vs. group 2: 3 (1-54) days (P = 0.001)], median hospitalization time [group 1: 23 (14-105) days vs. group 2: 18 (10-63) days (P = 0.018)]. No statistical difference was observed for the recurrence-free survival of 40% after 3 years (P = 0.311), the mortality rate, the morbidity rate (P = 0.108), surgical and respiratory complications, and the incidence of anastomotic leakage (P = 0.645). We conclude that in selected cases it may be possible to perform an extended gastrectomy for small type I cancers.

The purpose of the study was to determine the incidence, risk factors, treatment, and influence on survival of patients with de novo esophageal cancer after liver transplantation (LT). From 1988 to 2006, 1,926 patients underwent LT in our institution. A total of 9 patients (0.5%) developed a de novo esophageal cancer and 1 patient a cancer of the cardia (0.05%). A retrospective analysis was performed to reveal underlying diseases, timeframes between LT and appearance of cancer, predisposing factors, cancer therapy, complications, immunosuppressive regimens, and survival. Of our 10 patients, 7 (70%) suffered from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 3 patients (30%) developed an adenocarcinoma, including the patient with cancer of the cardia. A total of 9 patients were transplanted due to alcoholic cirrhosis; 1 patient suffered from hepatocellular carcinoma in nonA-nonB hepatitis-related cirrhosis. Median time to tumor diagnosis was 51 months after transplantation. A total of 5 patients were treated conservatively with combined radiochemotherapy and 5 underwent surgical resection. Patients with radiochemotherapy showed a mean survival of 14.8 months vs. 24.8 months for the patients of the surgery group. No major postoperative complication has been observed. A total of 2 patients of the surgery group are still alive after a follow-up of 15 and 89 months. In conclusion, de novo esophageal and cancer of the cardia after LT is a rare event. In spite of immunosuppression, no increased complication rate has been observed. Patients may have a survival benefit from surgical resection., ((c) 2007 AASLD.)