1. Histological assessment & use of immunohistochemical markers for detection of dysplasia in Barrett's esophageal mucosa.
- Author
-
Kinra P, Gahlot GPS, Yadav R, Baloda V, Makharia GK, Gupta SD, and Das P
- Subjects
- Adenocarcinoma metabolism, Adenocarcinoma pathology, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Barrett Esophagus pathology, Biomarkers, Tumor analysis, Disease Progression, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry methods, Male, Middle Aged, Precancerous Conditions pathology, Young Adult, Barrett Esophagus metabolism, Esophageal Mucosa metabolism, Esophageal Mucosa pathology, Esophageal Neoplasms metabolism, Esophageal Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Background: Histological assessment of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE) has high inter-observer variability. Hence, use of ancillary markers for early detection of dysplasia in BE is an important clinical question., Methods: In this retrospective study consecutive cases of BE (n = 59), over a period of 4 years were included. Hematoxylin and eosin stained sections were reviewed independently by 3 senior qualified pathologists, who graded the dysplasia according to the Vienna Classification system and inter-observer agreement was analysed using the Kappa statistics. Subsequently Alpha-Methyl Acyl-CoA Racemase (AMACR), p53, CyclinD1, β-catenin, H2AX and M30 immunohistochemical (IHC) stains were examined on the following disease categories: BE with no dysplasia [NFD] (45), BE with indefinite for dysplasia (IFD) (4), low grade dysplasia (LGD) (3), high grade dysplasia (HGD) (2) and in adenocarcinomas (5). H score was calculated by adding up products of different grades of stain distribution and stain intensities (range of scores 0-300)., Results: Among the 3 pathologists, overall agreement was poor (k 0.06; 95% CI -0.089 to 0.145), with highest disagreement noted for differentiating the LGD and IFDs (k = 0.21). After revising the histological criteria, the kappa improved to 0.53. Among the IHC stains performed, p53, β-catenin, H2AX and M30 stains were significantly useful to differentiate between IFD and LGD (P values: 0.04, 0.004, 0.05 & 0.04, respectively). AMACR and β-catenin stains though were up-regulated in HGD/adenocarcinomas than in other categories, their expression were not statistically different between the IFD and LGDs., Conclusions: A detail histological scoring system may bring uniformity in histological interpretation of dysplasia in BE. Using a combined panel of IHC stains seems helpful in detection of dysplasia in BE, especially to differentiate the IFD and LGD changes in BE., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF