Search

Introduction: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is associated with esophageal dysmotility. Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) results in improvement of skin tightness and lung function. Whether esophageal motility improves after HCT is unknown., Methods: Esophageal motility was studied using high-resolution esophageal manometry in 21 SSc patients before and at multiple time points after autologous HCT. Median posttransplant follow-up was 2 years (range, 6 months to 5 years)., Results: Prior to HCT, all 21 patients had abnormal motility-10 (48%) had unmeasurable and 11 (52%) had measurable peristalsis. Manometric diagnosis in the former 10 patients was "absent contractility" and in the latter 11 patients "ineffective esophageal motility (IEM)." After HCT, among the 10 patients with absent contractility, 9 continued to have absent contractility and one demonstrated weak measurable peristalsis. Of the 11 patients with IEM, 5 experienced SSc relapse, and 2 out of these 5 patients developed absent contractility. Among the 6 non-relapsed patients, 4 continued to have IEM, and 2 developed normal motility., Conclusions: HCT appears to have no beneficial effect on motility in patients with unmeasurable peristalsis. In patients with measurable peristalsis, HCT appears to stabilize and in some normalize motility, unless relapse occurs. Key Points • In patients with systemic sclerosis, esophageal dysmotility is a significant contributor to morbidity and so far, there has been no data describing the effects of hematopoietic cell transplantation on esophageal motility. • Our work demonstrated that in patients with systemic sclerosis and unmeasurable esophageal peristalsis prehematopoietic cell transplantation, there was no measurable beneficial effect of transplantation on esophageal motility. • In patients with systemic sclerosis and measurable peristalsis prehematopoietic cell transplantation, esophageal motility stabilized, except in relapsed patients., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).)

Introduction: High-resolution manometry (HRM) and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) are primary and/or complementary diagnostic tools for the evaluation of esophageal motility. We aimed to assess the interrater agreement and accuracy of HRM and FLIP interpretations., Methods: Esophageal motility specialists from multiple institutions completed the interpretation of 40 consecutive HRM and 40 FLIP studies. Interrater agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for continuous variables and Fleiss' κ statistics for nominal variables. Accuracies of rater interpretation were assessed using the consensus of 3 experienced raters as the reference standard., Results: Fifteen raters completed the HRM and FLIP studies. An excellent interrater agreement was seen in supine median integral relaxation pressure (ICC 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.95-0.98), and a good agreement was seen with the assessment of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow, peristalsis, and assignment of a Chicago Classification version 4.0 diagnosis using HRM (κ = 0.71, 0.75, and 0.70, respectively). An excellent interrater agreement for EGJ distensibility index and maximum diameter (0.91 [0.90-0.94], 0.92 [0.89-0.95]) was seen, and a moderate-to-good agreement was seen in the assignment of EGJ opening classification, contractile response pattern, and motility classification (κ = 0.68, 0.56, and 0.59, respectively) on FLIP. Rater accuracy for Chicago Classification version 4.0 diagnosis on HRM was 82% (95% confidence interval 78%-84%) and for motility diagnosis on FLIP Panometry was 78% (95% confidence interval 72%-81%)., Discussion: Our study demonstrates high levels of interrater agreement and accuracy in the interpretation of HRM and FLIP metrics and moderate-to-high levels for motility classification in FLIP, supporting the use of these approaches for primary or complementary evaluation of esophageal motility disorders., (Copyright © 2023 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Background: Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is a manometric diagnosis based on the Chicago Classification defined by inadequate relaxation of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) with swallowing, but with sufficient peristalsis such that the criteria for achalasia are not met. Possible causes include anatomical and functional etiologies. Further investigations, including computed tomography (CT) of the chest and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), to help elucidate the etiology of EGJOO have been suggested, but the utility of this approach has not been proven., Methods: All new diagnoses of EGJOO made in the calendar years 2015-2016 were included. A review was performed for each patient to assess clinical outcomes, diagnostic, and therapeutic interventions after the EGJOO diagnosis., Key Results: 107 EGJOO patients were included. Their primary complaints were dysphagia (68%), chest pain (12%), reflux (8%), pre-operative assessment (6%), regurgitation (3%), and cough (3%). The mean IRP was 21.8 mm Hg. After a mean follow-up period of 463 days, the etiology of EGJOO remained undetermined in 67% of patients. 48% of patients were investigated with cross-sectional imaging (and 10% with EUS to rule out external compression or malignancy as a cause of EGJOO; none of these tests provided any further useful information). In only two cases did the EGJOO progress to achalasia., Conclusions & Inferences: EGJOO is a manometric diagnosis with unclear clinical significance and outcome. CT and EUS of the GEJ were unhelpful at determining the cause of this entity. In this series, very few appear to progress to achalasia, none were due to malignancy, and many resolved spontaneously., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects both children and adults, with the highest incidence among young males with a history of atopy. The cause of the condition is not fully understood, but it involves a complex interaction between antigen exposures and genetic factors. Symptoms vary depending on age, with adults experiencing dysphagia and food impaction, while children may have feeding problems, abdominal pain, and vomiting. Diagnosis is based on clinical history and histological examination of esophageal biopsies. Treatment options include pharmacologic agents, elimination diets, and esophageal dilation if necessary. The approved formulation for adults in Canada is budesonide in an orodispersible tablet, which has shown improvement in histologic, endoscopic, and symptom outcomes. Other medications have shown inconsistent results and are not recommended. Dietary modifications can help identify food triggers and induce remission. Endoscopic dilation may be necessary for patients with esophageal strictures. Patient follow-up and shared decision-making are important for long-term management. Further research is needed to explore triggers, treatment strategies for refractory disease, and non-invasive monitoring techniques. [Extracted from the article]