Search

Most antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) damage the cell membrane of bacterial cells and induce rapid leakage of the internal cell contents, which is a main cause of their bactericidal activity. One of the AMPs, magainin 2 (Mag), forms nanopores in giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) comprising phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylglycerol (PG), inducing leakage of fluorescent probes. In this study, to elucidate the Mag-induced pore formation in lipid bilayer region in E. coli cell membrane, we examined the interaction of Mag with single GUVs comprising E. coli polar lipids (E. coli-lipid-GUVs). First, we investigated the Mag-induced leakage of a fluorescent probe AF488 from single E. coli-lipid-GUVs, and found that Mag caused rupture of GUVs, inducing rapid AF488 leakage. The rate constant of Mag-induced GUV rupture increased with the Mag concentration. Using fluorescence microscopy with a time resolution of 5 ms, we revealed the GUV rupture process: first, a small micropore was observed in the GUV membrane, then the pore radius increased within 50 ms without changing the GUV diameter, the thickness of the membrane at the pore rim concomitantly increased, and eventually membrane aggregates were formed. Mag bound to only the outer monolayer of the GUV before GUV rupture, which increased the area of the GUV bilayer. We also examined the physical properties of E. coli-lipid-GUVs themselves. We found that the rate constant of the constant tension-induced rupture of E. coli-lipid-GUVs was higher than that of PG/PC-GUVs. Based on these results, we discussed the Mag-induced rupture of E. coli-lipid-GUVs and its mechanism., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Some similarities and differences between action of two antimicrobial preparations - cationic antimicrobial peptide (CAMP) magainin 2 and human platelets extract (HPE) demonstrating CAMP properties - on morphological and mechanical properties of E. coli and B. cereus cells were revealed by atomic force microscopy. Both CAMPs induced formation of pore-like lesions on the E. coli surface and resulted in the cell collapse at the apical ends. It was established that HPE damaged the greater quantity of the E. coli cells as well as formed the larger pores as compared with magainin 2. On the other hand, HPE versus magainin 2 was more active against B. cereus cells; this was reflected in a greater number of damaged cells with a significant decrease of cell wall rigidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bacterial biofilms have long been recognized as a source of persistent infections and industrial contamination with their intransigence generally attributed to their protective layer of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). EPS, consisting of secreted nucleic acids, proteins, and polysaccharides, make it difficult to fully eliminate biofilms by conventional chemical or physical means. Since most bacteria are capable of forming biofilms, understanding how biofilms respond to new antibiotic compounds and components of the immune system has important ramifications. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are both potential novel antibiotic compounds and part of the immune response in many different organisms. Here, we use atomic force microscopy to investigate the biomechanical changes that occur in individual cells when a biofilm is exposed to the AMP magainin 2 (MAG2), which acts by permeabilizing bacterial membranes. While MAG2 is able to prevent biofilm initiation, cells in an established biofilm can withstand exposure to high concentrations of MAG2. Treated cells in the biofilm are classified into two distinct populations after treatment: one population of cells is indistinguishable from untreated cells, maintaining cellular turgor pressure and a smooth outer surface, and the second population of cells are softer than untreated cells and have a rough outer surface after treatment. Notably, the latter population is similar to planktonic cells treated with MAG2. The EPS likely reduces the local MAG2 concentration around the stiffer cells since once the EPS was enzymatically removed, all cells became softer and had rough outer surfaces. Thus, while MAG2 appears to have the same mechanism of action in biofilm cells as in planktonic ones, MAG2 cannot eradicate a biofilm unless coupled with the removal of the EPS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]