Search

The main objective of this study was to assess the IPP complication rates of patients undergoing placement via perineal incision versus more traditional penoscrotal approach in synchronous dual implantation. We identified 38 patients who underwent dual implantations of an IPP and AUS or urethral sling from 2011 to 2021 at a single tertiary center, 24 via perineal and 14 via penoscrotal incision. All IPP implants were done by a single surgeon. IPP postoperative complications were captured using the Clavien-Dindo classification at three separate time points, < 30 days, 30 days - 6 months, and > 6 months. The perineal group had two complications, IPP explantation due to rectourethral fistula (Grade III, > 6 months), and IPP explantation due to chronic genital pain (Grade III, > 6 months). The penoscrotal group had three complications, post-operative urinary retention requiring catheterization (Grade I, < 30 days), incision site infection (Grade I, < 30 days), and IPP explantation due to infection (Grade III, 30 days to < 6 months). There was no statistically significant difference in rate of patients with IPP complications between the two groups (p = 0.546) or in rate of IPP device malfunction (p = 0.264). These preliminary findings suggest that the single perineal incision is a viable surgical approach in synchronous dual implantation., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Patients who undergo penile prosthesis implantation as treatment for erectile dysfunction commonly complain of penile shortening after implantation. We conducted a study to determine whether knowledge of pre-operative stretched penile length measurement influences patient satisfaction. This prospective study consisted of 149 patients undergoing inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation from August 2017 to December 2019. Study group participants underwent pre-operative stretched penile length measurement in clinic while the control group did not. Six months post-operatively, patients completed a modified 14-item Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire to assess overall satisfaction and penile length satisfaction. A total of 102 patients were eligible for final analysis (49 in study group, 53 in control). Mean scores for overall treatment satisfaction were 3.57 and 3.53 (scale from 0 to 4) in the study versus control group, respectively (p = 0.483). Mean scores for satisfaction with penile length were 4.08 and 4.11 (scale from 1 to 5) in the study vs. control group (p = 0.645). The study suggests that knowledge of pre-operative stretched penile length does not influence post-operative satisfaction after penile prosthesis implantation. Therefore, performing pre-operative measurements in clinic solely for informing the patient may be unnecessary. Current interventions aimed at conserving penile length may be effective at maintaining satisfaction with penile length.Trial Registration- This trial is registered and approved by the IRB committee at our institution, ID: HSC-MS-19-0320., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Introduction: Penile traction therapy (PTT) and vacuum erection devices (VED) are nonsurgical conservative treatment options that have been used in the treatment of various urologic and sexual disorders such as Peyronie's Disease (PD) and Erectile Dysfunction (ED). Recently expanded uses for these therapies now include penile lengthening and with surgical interventions such as penile prosthesis surgery (PPS) and radical prostatectomy (RP). These devices can be used as both monotherapy or combination therapy., Objectives: To review the indications and clinical studies for PTT and VED., Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed to identify relevant studies addressing PTT, VED, and their indications. Searched terms included penile traction therapy, penile traction device, vacuum erection device, Peyronie's disease, penile prosthesis, radical prostatectomy, subjectively small penis, penile lengthening, erectile dysfunction., Results: PTT with dynamic traction devices has shown favorable benefits for PD in many studies. The benefits of VED for PD cannot be confirmed due to limited studies with poor quality. In posterior urethroplasty, VED shows promise postoperatively, with additional trials also needed. In PPS, both PTT and VED have had positive findings in pre- and postoperative treatment. In RP patients, VED use has had positive outcomes while new literature shows beneficial effects of dynamic PTT and provides a basis for future studies. VED use does not show great benefit in patients with small penis, however PTT does have some positive findings. In ED, VED has a history of successful use and PTT has promising new data available., Conclusion: PTT and VED have been utilized in urologic and sexual conditions with various success. Several promising areas utilizing both PTT and VED are being studied, however, more research needs to be done in these areas prior to becoming a standard treatment. Mehr J, Santarelli S, Green TP, et al. Emerging Roles of Penile Traction Therapy and Vacuum Erectile Devices. Sex Med Rev 2022;10:414-426., (Copyright © 2022 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)