Search

Objective: To report a prospectively planned analysis of two randomised controlled trials with embedded comparisons of prednisolone versus tetracosactide depot for the treatment of infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS)., Methods: Individual patient data from patients randomly allocated to prednisolone or tetracosactide depot were analysed from two trials (UKISS, ICISS). The comparison was embedded within trials in which some patients also received vigabatrin but only patients receiving monotherapy with randomly allocated hormonal treatments are included in this analysis. The main outcome was cessation of spasms (Days 13-14 after randomisation). Lead time to treatment and underlying aetiology were taken into account. Cessation of spasms on Days 14-42 inclusive, electroclinical response (EEG Day 14), plus developmental and epilepsy outcomes (at 14 months in UKISS and 18 months in ICISS) are also reported. Minimum treatment was prednisolone 40 mg per day for two weeks or tetracosactide depot 0·5 mg IM on alternate days for two weeks, all followed by a reducing dose of prednisolone over two weeks., Results: 126 infants were included in this study. On tetracosactide depot, 47 of 62 (76%) were free of spasms on Days 13-14 compared to 43 of 64 (67%) on prednisolone (difference 9%, 95% CI -7·2% to +25·2%, chi square 1·15, p = 0·28). For Day 14-42 cessation of spasms, on tetracosactide depot, 41 of 61 (67%) were free of spasms compared to 35 of 62 (56%) on prednisolone (difference 11%, 95% CI -6·4% to +28·4%, chi square 1·51, p = 0·22). There was no significant difference in mean VABS score between infants who received prednisolone compared with those who received tetracosactide depot (74·8 (SD 18·3) versus 78·0 (SD 20·2) t = -0·91 p = 0·36). The proportion with ongoing epilepsy at the time of developmental assessment was 20 of 61 (33%) in the tetracosactide group compared with 26 out of 63 (41%) in the prednisolone group (difference 8%, 95% CI -9·2% to +25·2%, Chi [2] 0·95, p = 0·33)., Significance: With hormone monotherapy, either prednisolone or tetracosactide depot may be recommended for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest JPO unsuccessfully approached Aventis for funding of a follow up study to look at visual field defects: he appeared in a promotional video for Aventis: he received income from UCB Pharma. The study sponsor for UKISS and ICISS received funding from Marathon and from UCB Pharma which was used in part to fund the research reported including salaries to JPO and SE. JPO, SE, FJKOC, EH and AL all received IP payments from the sponsor relating to funding from Marathon. AL received funding from Hoechst-Marion-Roussel to attend a conference. No other authors declared a conflict of interest., (© 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Paediatric Neurology Society.)

Purpose: The ILAE recommends baseline recordings of 30 min to detect abnormalities supporting a clinical diagnosis of epilepsy in children. A shorter recording time may be better tolerated by children and be more resource-efficient. Our aim was to determine how many abnormalities supporting a diagnosis of epilepsy would be missed by reducing the recording time of paediatric standard electroencephalograms (EEGs) from 20 to 15 min., Methods: We evaluated standard EEGs of 300 patients aged 2 months to 17 years referred consecutively with confirmed or suspected epilepsy. EEGs were recorded for 20 min on digital media. A digital copy of each EEG was truncated to give consecutive sequences of 10 min (sequence "A") and 5 min duration (sequences "B" and "C" respectively). A panel of EEG raters blinded to the children's' details other than age identified these sequences as "normal" or "abnormal" if they contained spike waves, discrete sharp waves or notched slow waves in the respective EEG period., Results: EEGs of 297 children were analysed (three were omitted for technical reasons). 109 out of 297 EEGs (37%) had specific abnormalities supportive of a diagnosis of an epilepsy. 17 of these EEGs showed the abnormality in EEG sequences "B" or "C" and 7 (95% CI: 1.9-12.2) out of these demonstrated the abnormality in sequence "C" only. 105 out of 297 EEGs had non-specific findings., Conclusion: We conclude that reducing the recording time of standard EEGs to 15 min may miss abnormalities in 2.36% [95% CI: 0.63-4.09%] overall and 6.42% [95% CI: 2.2-11.8%] of those with an abnormality supportive of an epilepsy to explain the reported symptoms. This result should inform any future discussions on seeking resource-efficiencies., (Copyright © 2012 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Infantile spasms is a severe infantile seizure disorder that is difficult to treat and has a high morbidity. Absence of spasms on days 13 and 14 after randomisation is more common in infants allocated hormone treatments than in those allocated vigabatrin. We sought to assess whether early control of spasms is associated with improved developmental or epilepsy outcomes., Methods: Infants enrolled in the United Kingdom Infantile Spasms Study (UKISS) were randomly assigned hormone treatment (n=55) or vigabatrin (n=52) and were followed up until clinical assessment at 12-14 months of age. We assessed neurodevelopment with the Vineland adaptive behaviour scales (VABS) at 14 months of age on an intention to treat basis., Findings: Of 107 infants enrolled, five died and 101 survivors reached both follow-up assessments. Absence of spasms at final clinical assessment (hormone 41/55 [75%] vs vigabatrin 39/51 [76%]) was similar in each treatment group (difference 1.9%, 95% CI -18.3% to 14.4%; chi(2)=0.05; p=0.82). Mean VABS score did not differ significantly (hormone 78.6 [SD 16.8] vs vigabatrin 77.5 [SD 12.7]; difference 1.0, 95% CI -4.9 to 7.0; t(99)=0.35, p=0.73). In infants with no identified underlying aetiology, the mean VABS score was higher in those allocated hormone treatment than in those allocated vigabatrin (88.2 [17.3] vs 78.9 [14.3]; difference 9.3, 95% CI 1.2 to 17.3; t(95)=2.28, p=0.025)., Interpretation: Hormone treatment controls spasms better than does vigabatrin initially, but not at 12-14 months of age. Better initial control of spasms by hormone treatment in those with no identified underlying aetiology may lead to improved developmental outcome.

The potential efficacy of temporal and extratemporal resection in patients with partial epilepsy uncontrolled by anti-epileptic drugs is undisputed. However, there are still uncertainties about which patients will benefit most. A systematic review of the available literature has been undertaken by four pairs of reviewers to assess the overall outcome of epilepsy surgery and to identify factors better correlated to seizure outcome. A Medline search for studies on epilepsy surgery published since 1984 was performed. Studies were included if they had a well-defined population and design, a sample size of at least 30 patients, an MRI performed in least 90% of cases, an expected duration of follow-up of at least one year, and a post-operative outcome measured as seizure remission. A good outcome was considered as seizure control or seizure-free status for at least one year or Engel class I. Based on the review of 47 articles meeting all the eligibility criteria, febrile seizures (odds ratio, OR, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.27-0.83), mesial temporal sclerosis (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.35-0.64), tumors (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.42-0.80), abnormal MRI (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.29-0.65), EEG/MRI concordance (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.32-0.83), and extensive surgical resection (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.16-0.36) were the strongest prognostic indicators of seizure remission (positive predictors); by contrast, post-operative discharges (OR 2.41; 95% CI 1.37-4.27) and intracranial monitoring (OR 2.72; 95% CI 1.60-4.60) predicted an unfavorable prognosis (negative predictors). Firm conclusions cannot be drawn for extent of resection, EEG/MRI concordance and post-operative discharges for the heterogeneity of study results. Neuromigrational defects, CNS infections, vascular lesions, interictal spikes, and side of resection did not affect the chance of seizure remission after surgery. Despite a number of limitations, the results of the review provide some insight into the selection of the best surgical candidates in clinical practice but raise concerns on the quality of published reports, and may serve as the basis for the identification of better standards to assess surgical outcome in observational studies.

During the past few years, a number of drugs have been added to the anti-epileptic arsenal. This review focusses on five of these drugs which have undergone extensive trials: Vigabatrin, Lamotrigine, Gabapentin, Felbamate and Oxcarbazepine. Some of these antiepileptic drugs appear to be helpful for treatment of catastrophic childhood epilepsies. Vigabatrin appears promising in children with infantile spasms who do not respond to ACTH or Prednisolone. Children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome may respond to treatment with Lamotrigine or Vigabatrin. Gabapentin and vigabatrin have proved to be effective in refractory partial seizures. Oxcarbazepine, a ketoderivative of carbamazepine, is as effective as Carbamazepine but has a better safety profile. Lesser neurotoxicity and fewer drug interactions is another advantage with these drugs. However monitoring is required to determine the long term safety with their usage. These drugs have a definite role in childhood epilepsies refractory to conventional antiepileptic drugs.