Search

Epilepsy is one of the most common disabling neurological disorders, but significant gaps exist in our knowledge about childhood epilepsy in rural populations. The present study assessed the prevalence of pediatric epilepsy in nine low-income rural counties in the Midwestern United States overall and by gender, age, etiology, seizure type, and syndrome. Multiple sources of case identification were used, including medical records, schools, community agencies, and family interviews. The prevalence of active epilepsy was 5.0/1000. Prevalence was 5.1/1000 in males and 5.0/1000 in females. Differences by age group and gender were not statistically significant. Future research should focus on methods of increasing study participation in rural communities, particularly those in which research studies are rare., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine the prevalence of active epilepsy in two southeastern rural Kansas counties., Methods: Medical records were abstracted from the emergency rooms, out- and inpatient services and clinics of 9 hospitals, from 10 doctors' offices, and 1 nursing home in and surrounding the two counties. Letters were mailed from hospitals and doctors' offices to invite their potentially eligible patients to participate in an interview. Medical record information and the interview, when available, were used for the final determination of active epilepsy, seizure type, etiology, syndrome, age, and gender in consensus conferences. Prevalence of epilepsy was calculated, and capture-recapture methodology, which estimates prevalence based on what is known about the population, was employed to assess active epilepsy in the two counties., Results: This study identified 404 individuals with active prevalent epilepsy who visited at least one of the 20 facilities during the observation period. The overall prevalence of active epilepsy was 7.2 per 1000. The seizure type for 71.3% of prevalent cases was unknown; among the 76 cases with known and classifiable seizure type, 55.3% had focal with secondary generalized seizures. Among the 222 cases with classifiable etiology, 53.1% were idiopathic/cryptogenic. About 75% (n=301) were captured at only one center, 72% (n=75) of the remaining 103 patients were captured at two centers, and 28 patients were identified at three or more centers. The capture-recapture assessment yielded an estimation of 982 prevalent patients. The overall estimated prevalence of epilepsy in the two Kansas counties using capture-recapture was 17 per 1000., Conclusions: The crude prevalence of epilepsy, using medical record survey methods, was similar to, but on the high end, of other total population prevalence studies in the United States. The capture-recapture assessment suggested that epilepsy prevalence might be considerably higher than the crude prevalence., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Using amalgamated Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data from nine states in 2006, this study examined the differences in demographics, health conditions, health behaviors, and quality of life among persons with active epilepsy (PWAE) and persons with a lifetime prevalence of epilepsy (PWLE), compared with persons without epilepsy (PWOE). Frequencies for PWAE, PWLE, and PWOE by selected health behaviors, health conditions, quality of life, and demographic variables were produced. Differences between persons with and without epilepsy were analyzed. Results indicated smoking and unemployment rates were significantly higher among PWLE/PWAE than among PWOE. PWLE/PWAE were also less likely than PWOE to report advanced educational attainment, and more likely to report suffering physical, mental, or emotional limitations that affected their activities in some way. Hispanics were less likely to report a lifetime or active prevalence of epilepsy than people without epilepsy. PWLE/PWAE report several differences in demographics, health conditions, health behaviors, and quality of life compared to people without epilepsy.

Objective: An estimated 24% of patients referred to epilepsy clinics actually have nonepileptic seizures. Various procedures have been used to precipitate nonepileptic events. The goal of this study was to use hypnosis in seizure provocation and differentiation between epileptic and nonepileptic seizure events., Methods: Fifty study participants were enrolled from the Via Christi Comprehensive Epilepsy Center's video/electroencephalography unit. Patients underwent the Hypnotic Induction Profile (HIP) to assess susceptibility to hypnosis. After completion of the HIP, participants underwent hypnosis by a physician trained to do so. They received a hypnotic suggestion to have a seizure. All seizure-like events were classified as either an epileptic, nonepileptic, or undetermined event based on whether or not the patient had abnormal EEG activity during the event., Results: Of the 50 participants enrolled, 3 withdrew consent, resulting in 47 participants. Seven (15%) participants failed to have an event of any type and were classified as undetermined. Sixteen (34%) participants were classified as having epileptic seizure events, and 24 (51%) participants had nonepileptic events. Most participants were Caucasian (87%), female (57%), and unemployed (55%). HIP scores ranged from 0 to 10. Participants classified with nonepileptic scores had higher mean HIP scores (8.08, SD 2.483) than those diagnosed with epileptic seizures [5.94, SD 3.492, t(25)=2.126, P=0.044]. The sensitivity of eliciting a nonepileptic event during hypnosis was only 0.46, but the specificity was 0.88., Conclusion: Hypnosis may be considered as a method of seizure provocation. Events provoked by hypnotic suggestion were more likely than not to be nonepileptic events. However, the current study has moderate specificity and poor sensitivity. Seizures could not be induced in patients who did not also have spontaneous seizures. Additional methodologies for seizure provocation need to be explored.

Obesity and lack of physical activity are an increasing problem. In addition to common barriers to physical activity, people with epilepsy also face fear of exercise-induced seizures, medication side effects, and, often, confusing advice regarding the safety of exercise. To explore barriers faced by people with epilepsy, we mailed a survey to 412 adult patients with epilepsy from an epilepsy center in Kansas. Survey items assessed patients' exercise habits, attitudes regarding exercise, and barriers to exercise. Forty-seven percent completed the survey. Most respondents reported that they did exercise, though most did so 3 or fewer days per week and at light intensity. Respondents who reported seizures as a barrier to exercise did not exercise with less frequency or intensity than those who did not report seizures as a barrier, but these respondents reported greater fear of seizures. Patient-specific education about the benefits of exercise needs to be initiated by physicians.

Objective: Concerns have been raised about the safety of switching from a branded antiepileptic drug (AED) to a generic AED. The goal of the study described here was to understand patients' experiences with generic AEDs in the Midwestern United States., Methods: A one-page, six-item survey was mailed to 356 patients to determine patients' awareness of the existence and their usage of generic AEDs., Results: Twenty-eight percent (27.8%) of respondents (N=179) reported breakthrough seizures they believed were a direct result of the switch from a brand to a generic AED, and 33.7% reported side effects due to the switch. Thirty-one percent (31.2%) returned to a brand-name AED as a result. Sixty-nine percent (68.8%) reported being unaware that some pharmacies switch to generic AEDs without a patient's or physician's consent, and 78.7% expressed concern over this., Conclusion: A significant percentage of patients reported that generic AEDs were responsible for breakthrough seizures and increased side effects. A significant percentage of patients also reported switching back to a brand-name AED and expressed concern over pharmacies switching to generic AEDs without a patient's or physician's consent.

Objective: To determine if applying chilled solution to exposed cerebral cortex can reduce interictal epileptiform activities in patients during surgery., Methods: Electrocorticography was used to record the epileptiform activity of 12 patients (ages 18-53) undergoing cortical mapping and resection surgery. Interictal spikes were counted at baseline and compared with spikes after applying room temperature and chilled Lactated Ringer's or normal saline solution., Results: Cortical irrigation with 150-cm(3), chilled (4 degrees C) normal saline solution reduced the mean number of interictal spikes from 11.46 to 4.87 spikes per minute (p=0.04). There was no significant reduction in the epileptic spike frequency when room temperature normal saline was used., Conclusion: The application of chilled solution directly to the cortex can reduce interictal epileptiform activities, suggesting that seizure potential can be suppressed to avoid evoked seizures during intraoperative surgery.

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders worldwide, and the majority of people with epilepsy who live in developed countries manage their condition with antiseizure medication. Surprisingly, therefore, the literature on epilepsy does not document a comprehensive investigation of patient adherence to medication treatment. This paper reviews existing literature on direct and indirect measures of adherence. Based on this review, areas in need for further research have been identified, including improvement of self-report instruments, consideration of cultural factors, attention to patient literacy or numeracy levels, and inclusion of patient-guided measures. While no single method of determining adherence has proved effective, combining direct and indirect measures in a patient-guided, culturally competent atmosphere may increase adherence to treatment, improving health outcomes for this population.

As the elderly represent the most rapidly growing population in the United States, it is critical that physicians are capable of managing their chronic illnesses, including epilepsy. Optimal treatment of epilepsy integrates an understanding of health-related quality of life (HRQOL), yet limited information is available to guide HRQOL issues among the elderly. This study found that seniors with epilepsy do not have poorer HRQOL compared with general epilepsy populations. However, when compared with general populations without epilepsy, seniors with epilepsy report a significantly lower HRQOL across all domains. Multiple factors may uniquely affect HRQOL among elderly populations with epilepsy: aging, comorbid conditions, and epilepsy variables. However, to our knowledge, no one instrument addresses all of these aspects. The development of HRQOL instruments specifically for an elderly population with epilepsy may be useful and needed.

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is recognized to be commonly used by patients, yet there have been few studies regarding the scope of CAM use by patients with epilepsy. This study assessed usage and perceptions of CAM by patients with epilepsy in the midwest of the United States. A 25-item survey was administered to adult patients with epilepsy, and data were collected from 228 patients. The survey collected demographics, specific CAM usage, adverse effects of CAM therapy, and perceptions of the effectiveness of CAM. Thirty-nine percent reported using CAM; 25% reported using CAM specifically for their epilepsy. Prayer/spirituality was the most commonly used form of CAM (46%), followed by "mega" vitamins (25%), chiropractic care (24%), and stress management (16%). CAM use is common among midwestern patients with epilepsy, although the pattern of use may be slightly different than in other regions of the United States and elsewhere.

Purpose: Very little is known about the attitudes and behaviors of minorities with epilepsy. This pilot study explored access to health care, help-seeking behaviors, and adherence to treatment among African-American females with epilepsy., Methods: Ethnographic interviews were conducted with 10 African-American female adults., Results: Findings indicate four major obstacles to care: limited financial resources, lack of knowledge about epilepsy among African-Americans, poor patient-provider communication, and lack of social support. Social support impacted individuals seeking surgery, and also affected purchasing medication, adherence to medical treatment, and needed transportation. Lack of knowledge and misinformation about epilepsy in the African-American community and poor communication with physicians contribute to the social stigma felt by these patients., Conclusions: The behavioral epidemiology of epilepsy among African-Americans is lacking. This disease exacerbates health disparities for this population. These findings point to a need for a safe haven for these individuals.

Purpose: Epilepsy is a chronic neurological illness that affects 2.7 million people in the United States, but remains poorly understood. Care providers may not recognize their patients' need for epilepsy information, contributing to treatment barriers, such as stigmatization and poor patient-provider communication. Methods: The current study piloted a survey of epilepsy-related attitudes and perceptions of 33 Midwestern neurologists. The survey included questions about perceived barriers to and motivators for treatment, thoughts on misperceptions of epilepsy in the community and in the patient population, and potential interventions to address misperceptions. Results: Respondents perceived misinformation and lack of knowledge in patients and the general public that could be contributing to the barriers that exist to treat patients adequately. Respondents suggested potential methods for addressing misperceptions effectively. Discussion: This study of neurologists' perceptions about epilepsy barriers and needs provides an important perspective for the development of interventions to address misperceptions and barriers among patients and the public. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]