Background Osimertinib is a 3rd-generation, irreversible, oral EGFR-TKI that potently and selectively inhibits both EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) and EGFR T790M resistance mutations, and has demonstrated efficacy in NSCLC CNS metastases. In the Phase III FLAURA study (NCT02296125), osimertinib resulted in significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit (primary endpoint; datacut off [DCO] 12 June 2017) over comparator EGFR-TKI (HR 0.46, p < 0.001). Overall survival (OS) data were immature (25% maturity) at that time. Here, we report the final OS analysis (58% maturity). Methods Eligible patients (pts): ≥18 years (Japan: ≥20), treatment-naïve with Ex19del/L858R EGFRm advanced NSCLC; WHO performance status 0–1. Pts with stable CNS metastases not requiring steroids for ≥2 weeks were allowed. Pts were randomised 1:1 to osimertinib 80 mg once daily (qd) orally (po) or comparator EGFR-TKI (gefitinib 250 mg qd/erlotinib 150 mg qd po), stratified by mutation status (Ex19del/L858R) and race (Asian/non-Asian). Crossover was allowed for pts in the comparator EGFR-TKI arm upon central confirmation of progression and T790M positivity. Primary endpoint: PFS by RECIST v1.1, per investigator. OS was a secondary endpoint. DCO 25 June 2019. Results Globally, 556 pts were randomised to osimertinib (n = 279) or comparator EGFR-TKI (n = 277). Per study protocol, 70 (25%) pts crossed over from comparator EGFR-TKI to osimertinib. Osimertinib significantly improved OS vs comparator EGFR-TKI. All causality AEs, per investigator: osimertinib, 98% (grade ≥3, 42%); comparator EGFR-TKI, 98% (grade ≥3, 47%). AEs leading to discontinuation: osimertinib, 15%; comparator EGFR-TKI, 18%. The safety profile appears consistent with previously reported data. Table: LBA16 Efficacy output Osimertinib n = 279 Comparator EGFR-TKI n = 277 OS hazard ratio 0.799 (0.641, 0.997); p = 0.0462 (95.05% confidence interval) Median OS, months 38.6 (34.5, 41.8) 31.8 (26.6, 36.0) (95% confidence interval) Deaths, total pts (%) 155 (56) 166 (60) Median follow-up for OS in all pts, months 35.8 27.0 Median follow-up for OS in censored * pts, months 43.1 43.1 12-month survival rate, % (95% confidence interval) 89 (85, 92) 83 (77, 87) 24-month survival rate, % (95% confidence interval) 74 (69, 79) 59 (53, 65) 36-month survival rate, % (95% confidence interval) 54 (48, 60) 44 (38, 50) Efficacy output Osimertinib n = 279 Comparator EGFR-TKI n = 277 OS hazard ratio 0.799 (0.641, 0.997); p = 0.0462 (95.05% confidence interval) Median OS, months 38.6 (34.5, 41.8) 31.8 (26.6, 36.0) (95% confidence interval) Deaths, total pts (%) 155 (56) 166 (60) Median follow-up for OS in all pts, months 35.8 27.0 Median follow-up for OS in censored * pts, months 43.1 43.1 12-month survival rate, % (95% confidence interval) 89 (85, 92) 83 (77, 87) 24-month survival rate, % (95% confidence interval) 74 (69, 79) 59 (53, 65) 36-month survival rate, % (95% confidence interval) 54 (48, 60) 44 (38, 50) OS for patients in the full analysis set was analysed using a log rank test (stratified by race and mutation type) for generation of the p-value and using the Breslow approach for handling ties. The median OS with 95% confidence intervals were calculated by Kaplan Meier technique. For statistical significance, a 2-sided p-value of less than 0.0495, as determined by the O'Brien-Fleming approach was required due the previous interim analysis. * Any patient not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive. Table: LBA16 Efficacy output Osimertinib n = 279 Comparator EGFR-TKI n = 277 OS hazard ratio 0.799 (0.641, 0.997); p = 0.0462 (95.05% confidence interval) Median OS, months 38.6 (34.5, 41.8) 31.8 (26.6, 36.0) (95% confidence interval) Deaths, total pts (%) 155 (56) 166 (60) Median follow-up for OS in all pts, months 35.8 27.0 Median follow-up for OS in censored * pts, months 43.1 43.1 12-month survival rate, % (95% confidence interval) 89 (85, 92) 83 (77, 87) 24-month survival rate, % (95% confidence interval) 74 (69, 79) 59 (53, 65) 36-month survival rate, % (95% confidence interval) 54 (48, 60) 44 (38, 50) Efficacy output Osimertinib n = 279 Comparator EGFR-TKI n = 277 OS hazard ratio 0.799 (0.641, 0.997); p = 0.0462 (95.05% confidence interval) Median OS, months 38.6 (34.5, 41.8) 31.8 (26.6, 36.0) (95% confidence interval) Deaths, total pts (%) 155 (56) 166 (60) Median follow-up for OS in all pts, months 35.8 27.0 Median follow-up for OS in censored * pts, months 43.1 43.1 12-month survival rate, % (95% confidence interval) 89 (85, 92) 83 (77, 87) 24-month survival rate, % (95% confidence interval) 74 (69, 79) 59 (53, 65) 36-month survival rate, % (95% confidence interval) 54 (48, 60) 44 (38, 50) OS for patients in the full analysis set was analysed using a log rank test (stratified by race and mutation type) for generation of the p-value and using the Breslow approach for handling ties. The median OS with 95% confidence intervals were calculated by Kaplan Meier technique. For statistical significance, a 2-sided p-value of less than 0.0495, as determined by the O'Brien-Fleming approach was required due the previous interim analysis. * Any patient not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive. Conclusions Osimertinib provided a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS vs comparator EGFR-TKI in first-line pts with EGFRm advanced NSCLC. Clinical trial identification NCT02296125. Editorial acknowledgement Natalie Griffiths, PhD, from iMed Comms, an Ashfield Company, funded by AstraZeneca. Legal entity responsible for the study AstraZeneca. Funding AstraZeneca. Disclosure B.C. Cho: Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer, AstraZeneca, MOGAM Institute, Dong-A ST, Janssen, Yuhan, Ono Pharmaceutical, Dizal Pharma, MSD; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Licensing / Royalties: Champions Oncology; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Takeda; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: TheraCanVac Inc. Y. Ohe: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Chugai, Dainippon Lilly, Ono, BMS Japan, Daiichi Sankyo, BI, Bayer, Ignyta, Pfizer, MSD, Taiho, Novartis, Kyorin, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Takeda, Celltrion, Kissei, Amgen, Janssen, Roxo. C. Zhou: Honoraria (self): Roche, Eli Lilly, BI, Merck, Hengrui, Qiru. B. Chewaskulyong: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca. D. Planchard: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Merck, MedImmune, Novartis, Pfizer, prIME Oncology, Peer CME, Roche; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, prIME Oncology, Peer CME, Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, MedImmune, Sanofi-Aventis, Taiho Pharma, Novocure, Daiichi Sankyo; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim , Roche, Merck, Novartis, prIME Oncology, Pfizer. J.F. Vansteenkiste: Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: – Apotex, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Novartis, Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: – AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche. J.E. Gray: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Takeda; Research grant / Funding (institution): Array, Merck, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb. R. Shah: Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, AstraZeneca. P.K. Cheema: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Takeda, Novartis, Genomic Health, Pfizer. M. Tiseo: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim. T. John: Advisory / Consultancy: Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Ignyta, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer. R. Hodge: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. Y. Rukazenkov: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. J. Soria: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Astex, Clovis, GSK, GamaMabs, Lilly, MSD, Mission Therapeutics, Merus, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Pierre Fabre, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Servier, Symphogen, Takeda; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: AstraZeneca, Gritstone; Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. F. Imamura: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca. S.S. Ramalingam: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Roche/Genentech, Loxo, Nektar, Tesaro; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Tesaro, Advaxis, Takeda. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]