1. Foliar Stoichiometry is Marginally Sensitive to Soil Phosphorus Across a Lowland Tropical Rainforest
- Author
-
Steven F. Oberbauer, Audrey Massmann, Molly A. Cavaleri, Stephen Porder, and Paulo C. Olivas
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Canopy ,Forest floor ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Ecology ,Rainforest ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Nutrient ,Agronomy ,Soil pH ,Linear regression ,Soil phosphorus ,Environmental Chemistry ,Environmental science ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Tropical rainforest - Abstract
The distribution of nutrients, both vertically and horizontally in a forest, has long been theorized to influence primary productivity. Working at La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica, we gathered the most comprehensive foliar samples to date for a lowland tropical rainforest to measure horizontal and vertical trends in foliar nutrients. The mean traits of foliage from forest floor to top-of-canopy were determined at 45 plots placed across the landscape in a stratified random design. Area-basis foliar N and P for these vertically integrated columns varied by a factor of 3, while foliar N:P and mass-basis foliar N and P varied by a factor of 2. The variance in plot-level foliar N:P and P was best explained by total soil P, while variance in foliar N was best explained by soil pH (regression trees: r2 $$\ge $$ 0.20, p $$\le $$ 0.01). Other soil, topographic, and forest structure factors offered no additional explanatory power for variation of foliar nutrients from plot to plot. To explore vertical trends, we aggregated the data across the landscape into ~ 2 m vertical segments. We found that foliar N:P was unrelated to height in the canopy, and that area-basis foliar N and P increased with height in the canopy (linear regression: r2 = 0.82 and r2 = 0.65 respectively, p
- Published
- 2021