1. Contributions of the Liquid and Ice Phases to Global Surface Precipitation: Observations and Global Climate Modeling
- Author
-
Paul R. Field, Chih-Chieh-Jack Chen, Andrew J. Heymsfield, Carl Schmitt, Andrew Gettelman, Chuntao Liu, and Aaron Bansemer
- Subjects
Surface (mathematics) ,Atmospheric Science ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Global climate ,Environmental science ,Precipitation ,010502 geochemistry & geophysics ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
This study is the first to reach a global view of the precipitation process partitioning, using a combination of satellite and global climate modeling data. The pathways investigated are 1) precipitating ice (ice/snow/graupel) that forms above the freezing level and melts to produce rain (S) followed by additional condensation and collection as the melted precipitating ice falls to the surface (R); 2) growth completely through condensation and collection (coalescence), warm rain (W); and 3) precipitating ice (primarily snow) that falls to the surface (SS). To quantify the amounts, data from satellite-based radar measurements—CloudSat, GPM, and TRMM—are used, as well as climate model simulations from the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) and the Met Office Unified Model (UM). Total precipitation amounts and the fraction of the total precipitation amount for each of the pathways is examined latitudinally, regionally, and globally. Carefully examining the contributions from the satellite-based products leads to the conclusion that about 57% of Earth’s precipitation follows pathway S, 15% R, 23% W, and 5% SS, each with an uncertainty of ±5%. The percentages differ significantly from the global climate model results, with the UM indicating smaller fractional S, more R, and more SS; and CAM showing appreciably greater S, negative R (indicating net evaporation below the melting layer), a much larger percentage of W and much less SS. Possible reasons for the wide differences between the satellite- and model-based results are discussed.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF