1. Allocation of biomass and nitrogen were studied for 1 year in experimental populations of Carex diandra, C. rostrata and C. lasiocarpa (species from mesotrophic fens) and C. acutiformis (a species from eutrophic fens). These species were grown at two levels of N supply (3 center dot 3 and 20 center dot 0 g N m to the -2 year to the -1, respectively). 2. At low N supply, total biomass did not differ between the species. At high N supply, the total biomass of C. lasiocarpa and C. acutiformis ('high-productive species') significantly exceeded that of C. diandra and C. rostrata ('low-productive species'). In all species, percentage nitrogen allocation to the leaves exceeded percentage biomass allocation to the leaves. 3. The high-productive species had a higher shoot:root ratio, a higher percentage biomass allocation to the leaves (leaf weight ratio, LWR), a higher total nitrogen content and a higher percentage nitrogen allocation to the leaves than the low-productive species. However, the low-productive species had higher leaf nitrogen concentrations (on a weight basis) than the high-productive species. 4. Parameters which are related to light interception, such as the specific leaf area (SLA: m squared of leaf per kg of leaf), the leaf area ratio (LAR: m squared of leaf per kg of plant), the leaf area index (LAI: m squared of leaf per m squared of soil) and the ratio between total leaf area and total root length, did not differ consistently between the high-productive and the low-productive species. 5. Compared with the high-productive species, the low-productive species invested relatively more biomass and nitrogen in plant parts which contribute to the acquisition of below-ground resources. 6. At low N supply, there was a decrease in all species of the shoot:root ratio, LWR, LAR, LAI, and the ratio between total leaf area and total root length. 7. The rank order of potential productivity of the species in this study did not match the rank order of nitrogen availability in their natural habitat. It is suggested that the distribution of these species is not only determined by their potential productivity, but also by specific demands on the water chemistry and by their competitive ability.