Search

Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of clinical, laboratory, and radiological markers and the neonatologist-performed intestinal ultrasound (NP-IUS) for treatment interventions in preterm neonates who developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)., Study Design: This was a case-control study of preterm neonates < 35 weeks with a diagnostic workup for NEC. The diagnostic workup included NP-IUS performed by trained neonatologists using a standard protocol, abdominal roentgenogram (AXR), and laboratory investigations. Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) performed by two neonatologists was standardized to detect 11 injury markers. AXRs were read independently by experienced pediatric radiologists. The investigators who retrospectively interpreted the IUS were blinded to the clinical and treatment outcomes., Results: A total of 111 neonates were assessed. Fifty-four did not require intervention and formed the control group. Twenty cases were treated medically, 21 cases were treated with late surgery for stricture or adhesions, and 16 were treated with early surgery. The integrated model of cumulative severity of ultrasound markers, respiratory and hemodynamic instability, abdominal wall cellulitis, and C- reactive protein > 16 mg/L had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.94%, p  < 0.0001) for diagnosing NEC requiring surgical intervention. We also investigated the utility of Bell's classification to diagnose either the need for surgery or death, and it had an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.65-0.83%, p  < 0.0001)., Conclusion: In this cohort, a combination of specific IUS markers and clinical signs of instability, abdominal wall cellulitis, plus laboratory markers were diagnostic of NEC requiring interventions., Key Points: · The diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis requires a combination of markers.. · The combination of specific ultrasound markers, clinical signs, and laboratory markers were diagnostic of NEC requiring intervention.. · The intestinal ultrasound performed by a trained neonatologist was the most sensitive diagnostic marker of NEC requiring surgical intervention.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Clinical management of gut injury has been a challenge to the clinician since the first description of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) about 50 years ago, and it is still poorly defined. Most of the diagnostic markers are non-specific, and there is no consensus yet on a reliable gold standard for diagnosis. This report describes our approach to integrating point of care intestinal ultrasound (IUS) as the primary radiological assessment modality with other clinical and biochemical markers., Conclusions: This is the first clinical guideline integrating point of care IUS as a routine assessment of the gut injury. This integrated algorithm improves the quality of care of the gut injury, provides a more accurate diagnosis of NEC, and differentiates other categories of gut injury., What Is Known: • Necrotizing enterocolitis is a poorly defined disease, and the routine assessment relying on AXR does not differentiate NEC from other categories of gut injury., What Is New: • Integrating point of care IUS with the routine clinical assessment of gut injury enables the gut injury to be classified according to the triggering factors and severity; this helps target the appropriate management., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: To compare neonatal outcomes of preterm infants (born at <32 weeks' gestation) with focal/spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)-related perforation, NEC without perforation or no NEC/perforation., Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of 17,426 infants admitted to Canadian neonatal intensive care units during 2010 to 2013. The primary outcome was a composite of mortality or morbidity (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, severe retinopathy, periventricular leukomalacia or nosocomial infection). Association of intestinal perforation with neonatal outcome was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression., Result: SIP was present in 178 (1.0%) infants, NEC-related perforation in 246 (1.4%) and NEC without perforation in 538 (3.1%). Any intestinal perforation was associated with higher odds of the composite outcome (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 8.21, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 6.26 to 10.8); however, the odds were significantly lower for focal/SIP compared with NEC-related perforation (AOR: 0.29, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.51)., Conclusion: Of the two types of intestinal perforation, NEC-related perforation was associated with the highest risk of an adverse neonatal outcome.

Objectives: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most common acquired intestinal disease of neonates. Previous reports on incidence have generally examined small cohorts of extremely low-birth-weight infants and have not examined risk-adjusted variations among neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The authors examined risk-adjusted variations in the incidence of NEC in a large group of Canadian NICUs and explored possible therapy-related risks., Methods: The authors obtained data on 18,234 infants admitted to 17 tertiary level Canadian NICUs from January 1996 to October 1997. They used multivariate logistic regression analysis to examine the inter-NICU variation in incidence of NEC, with adjustment for population risk factors and admission illness severity, and explored therapy-related variables., Results: The incidence of NEC was 6.6% (n = 238) among 3,628 infants with birth weight < or = 1,500 g (VLBW), and 0.7% (n = 98) among 14,606 infants with birth weight > 1,500 g (HBW). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that for VLBW infants, NEC was associated with lower gestational age and treatment for hypotension and patent ductus arteriosus. Among HBW infants, NEC was associated with lower gestational age, presence of congenital anomalies (cardiovascular, digestive, musculoskeletal, multiple systems) and need for assisted ventilation. There was no significant variation in the risk-adjusted incidence of NEC among NICUs, with the exception of one NICU reporting no cases of NEC., Conclusions: Risk factors for NEC were different in VLBW and HBW infants. There was no significant variation in the risk-adjusted incidence of NEC among Canadian NICUs, with one possible exception.

We examined (1) the observer variability (both interobserver and intraobserver) in interpretation of abdominal radiographs of infants with suspected necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), (2) the interobserver variability for individual radiologic signs used to diagnose NEC, and (3) the influence of experience in determining the extent of observer variability. Our hypotheses were (1) there would be considerable observer variability in interpretation of abdominal radiographs of infants with suspected NEC; (2) the extent of observer variability would differ for individual radiologic signs of NEC; and (3) the extent of observer variability would be determined by the observer's experience. The participants included 12 observers: two pediatric radiologists, four attending neonatologists, three neonatal fellows, and three pediatric residents. The participating observers under similar interpretation conditions, twice independently, interpreted the same 40 pairs of abdominal radiographs from infants with suspected NEC. The interval between the two interpretations was 3 to 6 months. Intraobserver and interobserver variability was assessed by applying the Kappa statistic to the radiologic signs of NEC for the two separate interpretations. The observers were blinded to patient's identity and the clinical course. Each observer recorded the absence, suspicion, or presence of (1) intestinal distention, (2) air fluid levels, (3) bowel wall thickening, (4) pneumatosis intestinalis, (5) portal venous gas, (6) pneumoperitoneum, and (7) NEC. We found low intraobserver and interobserver agreements. There was considerable variation in observer variability for individual radiologic signs. Trained observers performed better than intraining observers. We conclude that the radiologic signs in isolation should not be considered reliable. We recommend studies to formulate more objective criteria for many of the radiographic features of NEC. Standardization and periodic enforcement of these criteria among observers could reduce observer variability. We suggest that, to decrease both false-negative and false-positive interpretation, an experienced observer should always review the radiographs of infants with suspected NEC.