1. Beta-lactams susceptibility testing of penicillin-resistant, ampicillin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis isolates: a comparative assessment of Etest and disk diffusion methods against broth dilution.
- Author
-
Conceição N, Rodrigues WF, de Oliveira KLP, da Silva LEP, de Souza LRC, da de Cunha Hueb Barata Oliveira C, and de Oliveira AG
- Subjects
- Amoxicillin pharmacology, Ampicillin pharmacology, Anti-Bacterial Agents pharmacology, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial, Humans, Imipenem pharmacology, Penicillins pharmacology, Piperacillin pharmacology, Sensitivity and Specificity, Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests methods, Enterococcus faecalis drug effects, Microbial Sensitivity Tests methods, beta-Lactams pharmacology
- Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of disk diffusion and Etest methods, compared to that of the broth dilution reference method for identifying beta-lactam susceptibilities of Penicillin-Resistant, Ampicillin-Susceptible Enterococcus faecalis (PRASEF) isolates. Fifty-nine PRASEF and 15 Penicillin-Susceptible, Ampicillin-Susceptible E. faecalis (PSASEF) clinical nonrepetitive isolates were evaluated. The effectiveness of five beta-lactams (ampicillin, amoxicillin, imipenem, penicillin, and piperacillin) was tested. All antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed and interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Interpretative discrepancies, such as essential agreement, categorical agreement, and errors, were assessed. The acceptability was ≥ 90% for both categorical agreement and essential agreement. Etest proved to be an accurate method for testing beta-lactam susceptibilities of the emerging PRASEF isolates, disk diffusion presented poor performance, particularly for imipenem and piperacillin.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF