Search

Background: Intestinal clearance of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE-IC) is a cornerstone to discontinue isolation precautions for CPE patients in hospitals. This study aimed to evaluate the time to spontaneous CPE-IC and identify its potential associated risk factors., Methods: This retrospective cohort study was carried out between January 2018 and September 2020 on all patients in a 3200-bed teaching referral hospital with confirmed CPE intestinal carriage. CPE-IC was defined as at least three consecutive CPE-negative rectal swab cultures without a subsequent positive result. A survival analysis was performed to determine the median time to CPE-IC. A multivariate Cox model was implemented to explore the factors associated with CPE-IC., Results: A total of 110 patients were positives for CPE, of whom 27 (24.5%) achieved CPE-IC. Median time to CPE-IC was 698 days. Univariate analysis showed that female sex (P=0.046), multiple CPE-species in index cultures (P=0.005), Escherichia coli or Klebsiella spp. (P=0.001 and P=0.028, respectively) were significantly associated with the time to CPE-IC. Multivariate analysis highlighted that identification of E. coli carbapenemase-producing or CPEs harbouring ESBL genes in index culture extended the median time to CPE-IC, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.13 (95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.45]; P=0.001 and aHR = 0.34 (95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.90); P=0.031)., Conclusion: Intestinal decolonization of CPE can take several months to years to occur. Carbapenemase-producing E. coli are likely to play a key role in delaying intestinal decolonization, probably through horizontal gene transfer between species. Therefore, discontinuation of isolation precautions in CPE-patients should be considered with caution., (Copyright © 2023 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) are a major public health concern worldwide. Little is known about the prevalence of ESBL-PE colonization in rehabilitation wards in France. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of ESBL-PE colonization in rehabilitation wards in the Parisian area and to identify potential risk factors for ESBL-PE carriage., Patients and Methods: This one-day prospective study was performed in three rehabilitation wards in Paris, France, between September 1, 2016, and June 26, 2017. Rectal samples were collected for microbial analysis from patients who were present at 8am and all isolates recovered were identified by mass spectrometry. The presence of ESBL-PE was confirmed using a double-disk synergy test according to EUCAST recommendations. Risk factors for colonization were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses., Results: A total of 136 patients were analyzed (50.7% of female patients; median age 71 years). Twenty-eight patients (20.6%) were colonized with ESBL-PE on the day of sampling. Escherichia coli was identified in 15 (50%) cases and Klebsiella pneumoniae in six (20%). None of the variables studied was significantly associated with a higher risk of ESBL-PE colonization. However, there was a tendency for a higher risk of ESBL-PE colonization with dementia (OR = 6.116 [95%CI: 0.92-40.57]; p = 0.06) and diabetes with complications (OR = 2.853 [95%CI: 1-8.16]; p = 0.05)., Conclusions: Patients in rehabilitation wards showed a high rate of ESBL-PE colonization (21%). Continuous monitoring of antibiotic resistance among potentially pathogenic bacteria, including ESBL-PE, is crucial as colonized patients represent an important reservoir for transmission after discharge outside the hospital setting., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background: Substantial scientific evidence shows that contamination of environmental surfaces in hospitals plays an important role in the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). To date, studies have failed to identify the risk factors associated with environmental contamination., Aim: To evaluate, compare, and identify factors associated with environmental contamination around carriers of different MDROs., Methods: This was a prospective cohort study from May 2018 to February 2020. A total of 125 patients were included, having been admitted to Avicenne Hospital and Hotel Dieu de France de Beyrouth Hospital who were faecal carriers of MDROs (extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE), carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE)). For each patient, quantification of MDRO in stool was undertaken, plus a qualitative evaluation of the presence of MDRO in six different environmental sites; and clinical data were collected., Findings: MDROs comprised ESBL-PE (34%), CPE (45%), and VRE (21%). The most frequent MDRO species was Escherichia coli. Contamination of at least one environmental site was observed for 22 (18%) patients. Only carriage of VanA was associated with a significantly higher risk of dissemination. Having a urinary catheter, carriage of OXA48 and E. coli were protective factors against environmental contamination. There were no significant differences in environmental contamination between E. coli and other Enterobacterales or between ESBL-PE and CPE., Conclusions: Hospital environmental contamination rates are substantially higher for patients with VRE, compared to the low environment dissemination rates around ESBL-PE and CPE. Further studies on a larger scale are needed to confirm the validity of our findings., (Copyright © 2021 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Recently, molecular assays have been demonstrated to be reliable for rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) directly from positive blood cultures, reducing significantly the time for identification. Few studies have tested their performance on rectal swabs and no comprehensive conclusions have been reached regarding their utility for infection control management. Our aim was to review and assess the overall diagnostic test accuracy of polymerase chain reaction for the detection of CPE in rectal swabs. The electronic database PubMed was searched, up to October 1 st , 2019, without language restriction or publication date restrictions. First, the concepts of the research questions were defined: 'carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae', 'molecular testing', 'test detection', and 'rectal screening'. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using the QUADAS-2 instrument. Statistical analyses were carried out in Stata software using the bivariate model. In all, 143 articles were screened and 16 studies were included. Five (31%) of the studies were conducted in the context of a CPE outbreak; one study (6%) included patients pre-identified with CPE in clinical samples (blood or tracheal secretions), whereas the rest (63%) collected rectal swabs from patients considered at high risk of colonization. The molecular assays evaluated had a relatively good sensitivity of 0.95 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.902-0.989), and an excellent specificity of 0.994 (95% CI: 0.965-1). Molecular techniques seem to be a useful, accurate diagnostic tool in screening for carriage of CPE in contact patients around a fortuitous discovery of a non-isolated hospitalized carrier patient., (Copyright © 2019 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Detection of faecal carriers of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) has become a routine medical practice in many countries. In an outbreak setting, several public health organizations recommend three-weekly rectal screenings to rule-out acquisition in contact patients. This strategy, associated with bed closures and reduction of medical activity for a relatively long time, seems costly., Aim: The objective of this study was to test the positive and negative predictive values of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR; GeneXpert®) carried-out at Day 0, compared with conventional three-weekly culture-based rectal screenings, in identifying, among contact patients, those who acquired CPE/VRE., Methods: A multicentre retrospective study was conducted from January2015 to October2018. All contact patients (CPs) were included identified from index patients (IPs) colonized or infected with CPE/VRE, incidentally discovered. Each CP was investigated at Day 0 by PCR (GeneXpert®), and by the recommended three-weekly screenings., Findings: Twenty-two IPs and 159 CPs were included. An average of 0.77 secondary cases per patient was noted, with a mean duration of contact of 10 days (range 1-64). Among the 159 CPs, 16 (10%) had a CPE/VRE-positive culture during the monitoring period. Rectal screenings were positive at Day 0 (10 patients), Day 7 (two patients), Day 14 (four patients). Thirteen of 16 patients with positive culture had a positive PCR at Day 0. Overall, a concordance of 97.5% (155/159) was observed between the three-weekly screenings and Day 0 PCR results. When performed on CPs at Day 0 of the identification of an IP, PCR (GeneXpert®) allowed the reduction in turnaround time by five to 27 days, compared to three-weekly screenings. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 100% and 98%, respectively., Conclusions: The use of RT-PCR (GeneXpert®) can avoid the three-weekly rectal samplings needed to rule-out acquisition of CPE/VRE., (Copyright © 2019 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are a major health issue. Cohorting may help to control spread of CPEs in hospitals, but is expensive and hard to implement., Aim: To identify ward variables associated with CPE in-hospital transmission in a hospital where cohorting has never been implemented., Methods: Cohort prospective study, comparing 14-consecutive-day periods regarding in-hospital transmission. Each period met the two following conditions: (i) CPE carriers/infected admitted for ≥48 h; (ii) 80% of relative contact patients were screened at least twice. Periods (a) with no acquired CPE case among relative contact patients were compared to periods (b) during which one or more CPE case acquisition was identified. Variables potentially associated with CPE transmission were assessed: colonization pressure, caregiver:patient ratio, hand hygiene compliance, hydro-alcoholic product consumption, antibiotic consumption, and infection control team (ICT) involvement on the ward., Findings: Sixty-eight periods of two consecutive weeks were included, 18 (26.5%) included at least one CPE case acquisition. By multivariate analysis, colonization pressure (odds ratio: 1.12; 95% confidence interval: 1.0-1.25; P = 0.042) and antibiotic consumption (2.41; 1.02-5.66; P = 0.044) were associated with CPE in-hospital transmission. Caregiver:patient ratio potentiated both these variables, suggesting a role for understaffing in CPE transmission., Conclusion: Understanding ward variables associated with CPE spread can help design suitable solutions. Colonization pressure and antibiotic consumption seems to be driving in-hospital transmission, along with caregiver:patient ratio. In presence of high colonization pressure, dedicated healthcare workers for managing CPE patients should be implemented. Co-ordination between ICT and antimicrobial stewardship team is also crucial to prevent CPE spread., (Copyright © 2018 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Currently, contact precautions are recommended for patients colonized or infected with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE). Recent studies have challenged this strategy. This study aimed to assess the rate of ESBL-PE faecal carriage among hospitalized patients according to type of hospital ward, and to identify risk factors associated with carriage., Methods: A point prevalence study was conducted in five different types of hospital ward [medical, surgical, intensive care unit (ICU), after care and rehabilitation, and geriatric] in eight French hospitals. All patients included in the study provided a fresh stool sample., Results: In total, 554 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 73 years (range 60-82 years). The overall faecal carriage rate of ESBL-PE was 17.7%. The most frequently encountered species among ESBL-PE was Escherichia coli (71.4%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (14.3%). Risk factors associated with ESBL-PE faecal carriage on univariate analysis were: living in the Paris region (P<0.01) and hospitalization on a geriatric ward (P<0.01). Interestingly, the cumulative duration of hospital stay before screening was not associated with a significantly higher prevalence of ESBL-PE carriage, regardless of ward type. The ESBL-PE colonization rate was much higher for patients hospitalized on geriatric wards (28.1%) and ICUs (21.7%) compared with those for patients hospitalized on surgical wards (14.8%), medical wards (12.8%) or aftercare and rehabilitation (11.2%)., Conclusion: The overall prevalence of ESBL-PE faecal carriage was 17.7%, with only 21% of patients identified previously as carriers. The delay between admission and screening was not associated with an increase in ESBL-PE faecal carriage., (Copyright © 2017 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To avoid the use of carbapenems, alternatives such as cephamycin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and others are suggested for the treatment of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) infections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and the feasibility of antimicrobial de-escalation for ESBL-PE-related infections., Methods: A prospective observational, bi centric cohort study was conducted. All patients with ESBL-PE infections were included. De-escalation was systematically suggested if patients were clinically stable and the isolate was susceptible to possible alternatives., Results: Seventy-nine patients were included: 36 (45.6%) were children, 27 (34.1%) were hospitalized in intensive care units, and 37 (47%) were immunocompromised. Urinary tract infections, pneumonia, and catheter-related bloodstream infections accounted for 45.6%, 19%, and 10%, respectively, of the cohort. Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacter cloacae were the three most frequent causative organisms isolated. On day 5, 47 (59.2%) of the patients were still receiving carbapenems. Antimicrobial resistance (44.7%), infection relapse (26.9%), and clinical instability (19.2%) were the most important reasons for not prescribing alternatives. E. coli-related infections appeared to be a protective factor against maintaining the carbapenem prescription (odds ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.041-0.324; p=0.0013)., Conclusions: In clinical practice, less than 50% of patients with ESBL-PE-related infections were de-escalated after empirical treatment with carbapenems., (Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The increasing bacterial resistance to antibiotics has become a major public health concern bringing the threat of therapeutic impasses. In this context, control of the spread of highly-resistant bacteria emerging antibiotics (BHRe), such as glycopeptide-resistant enterococci (VRE) and Enterobacteriaceae producing carbapenemases (CPE), is based on a dual strategy of reducing the prescription of antibiotics to limit the pressure selection and preventing the spread from carriers. Prevention strategy is based on three different levels such as standard precautions for all patients with a particular focus on the management of excreta, and additional precautions for BHRe carriers. What makes it difficult is that carriage is usually completely asymptomatic, enterobacteria and enterococci are normal commensal of gut microbiota. Explosive dissemination of Enterobacteriaceae producing extended spectrum beta-lactamases in hospital and community heralds the emergence of CPE whose import by patients with a history of hospitalization in abroad may be the main source of spread in France., (Copyright © 2015 Société nationale française de médecine interne (SNFMI). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

The fight against multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacilli (MDRGNB), especially extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae, is about to be lost in our country. The emergence of new resistance mechanisms to carbapenems in these Enterobacteriaceae exposes patients to a risk of treatment failure without any other therapeutic options. This dramatic situation is paradoxical because we are well aware of the 2 major factors responsible for this situation: 1) MDRO cross-transmission, associated with a low compliance to standard precautions, especially hand hygiene, and 2) overexposure of patients to antibiotics. The implementation of a "search and isolate" policy, which was justified to control the spread of some MDRO that remained rare in the country, was not associated with a better adherence to standard precautions. The antibiotic policy and the measures implemented to control antibiotic consumptions have rarely been enforced and have shown inconsistent results. Notably, no significant decrease of antibiotic consumption has been observed. There is no excuse for these poor results, because some authors evaluating the effectiveness of programs for the control of MDRO have reported their positive effects on antimicrobial resistance without any detrimental effects. It is now urgent to deal with the 2 major factors by establishing an educational and persuasive program with quantified and opposable objectives. Firstly, we have to improve the observance of hand hygiene above 70%. Secondly, we have to define and reach a target for the reduction of antibiotic consumption both in community and in hospital settings., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

A retrospective investigation was conducted to determine whether the consumption of alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) used was correlated with the incidence of acquired nosocomial infection due to meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or to extended-spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains. Between 2005 and 2008, the use of ABHRs increased significantly by 8 L per 1000 patient-days of hospitalization per year. During the same period, adherence to hand hygiene increased significantly from 55.6% to 70.9% (P < 0.0001). Despite these improvements there was a steady increase in the incidence of ESBL-producing strains in the past three years and no correlation was found between ABHR consumption and either nosocomially acquired ESBL or adherence to hand hygiene., (Copyright © 2011 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)