Search

ABSTRACT The infinite slope method is widely used as the geotechnical component of geomorphic and landscape evolution models. Its assumption that shallow landslides are infinitely long (in a downslope direction) is usually considered valid for natural landslides on the basis that they are generally long relative to their depth. However, this is rarely justified, because the critical length/depth ( L/H) ratio below which edge effects become important is unknown. We establish this critical L/H ratio by benchmarking infinite slope stability predictions against finite element predictions for a set of synthetic two-dimensional slopes, assuming that the difference between the predictions is due to error in the infinite slope method. We test the infinite slope method for six different L/H ratios to find the critical ratio at which its predictions fall within 5% of those from the finite element method. We repeat these tests for 5000 synthetic slopes with a range of failure plane depths, pore water pressures, friction angles, soil cohesions, soil unit weights and slope angles characteristic of natural slopes. We find that: (1) infinite slope stability predictions are consistently too conservative for small L/H ratios; (2) the predictions always converge to within 5% of the finite element benchmarks by a L/H ratio of 25 (i.e. the infinite slope assumption is reasonable for landslides 25 times longer than they are deep); but (3) they can converge at much lower ratios depending on slope properties, particularly for low cohesion soils. The implication for catchment scale stability models is that the infinite length assumption is reasonable if their grid resolution is coarse (e.g. >25 m). However, it may also be valid even at much finer grid resolutions (e.g. 1 m), because spatial organization in the predicted pore water pressure field reduces the probability of short landslides and minimizes the risk that predicted landslides will have L/H ratios less than 25. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The reliability-based design of shallow foundations is generally implemented via a load and resistance factor design methodology embedded in a limit state design framework. For any particular limit state, the design proceeds by ensuring that the factored resistance equals or exceeds the factored load effects. Load and resistance factors are determined to ensure that the resulting design is sufficiently safe. Load factors are typically prescribed in structural codes and take into account load uncertainty. Factors applied to resistance depend on both uncertainty in the resistance (accounted for by a resistance factor) and desired target reliability (accounted for by a newly introduced consequence factor). This paper concentrates on how the consequence factor can be defined and specified to adjust the target reliability of a shallow foundation designed to resist bearing capacity failure. La conception basée sur la fiabilité pour des fondations peu profondes est généralement appliquée à partir d'une méthodologie de conception basée sur des facteurs de chargement et résistance, celle méthodologie étant introduite dans un cadre de conception selon les états limites. Pour tout état limite particulier, la conception s'effectue par une vérification afin que la résistance prévue soit égale ou supérieure aux effets de chargement prévus. Les facteurs de chargement et de résistance sont déterminés de telle sorte que la conception finale est suffisamment sécuritaire. Les facteurs appliqués à la résistance dépendent de l'incertitude dans la résistance (considérée par le facteur de résistance) et de la fiabilité visée (considérée par le facteur de conséquence, nouvellement introduit). Cet article discute de la manière dont le facteur de conséquence peut être défini et spécifié afin d'ajuster la fiabilité visée d'une fondation peu profonde conçue pour résister à la rupture en capacité portante. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The paper investigates the probability of failure of slopes using both traditional and more advanced probabilistic analysis tools. The advanced method, called the random finite-element method, uses elastoplasticity in a finite-element model combined with random field theory in a Monte-Carlo framework. The traditional method, called the first-order reliability method, computes a reliability index which is the shortest distance (in units of directional equivalent standard deviations) from the equivalent mean-value point to the limit state surface and estimates the probability of failure from the reliability index. Numerical results show that simplified probabilistic analyses in which spatial variability of soil properties is not properly accounted for, can lead to unconservative estimates of the probability of failure if the coefficient of variation of the shear strength parameters exceeds a critical value. The influences of slope inclination, factor of safety (based on mean strength values), and cross correlation between strength parameters on this critical value have been investigated by parametric studies in this paper. The results indicate when probabilistic approaches, which do not model spatial variation, may lead to unconservative estimates of slope failure probability and when more advanced probabilistic methods are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two well-known return mapping algorithms, the closest point projection method (CPPM) and the cutting plane algorithm (CPA), have been analyzed in detail in relation to two classical failure problems in geomechanics, namely, bearing capacity and slope stability. The stability and efficiency of the algorithms have been investigated in relation to two types of stiffness operators, namely, the consistent elastoplastic modulus and the continuum elastoplastic modulus, and two types of stresses prediction strategies, namely, path independent (based on stresses at previous step) and path dependent (based on stresses at the previous iteration). The numerical experiments show that CPPM working with a consistent elastoplastic modulus and a path independent strategy gives the best performance. It was also observed, however, that the CPA with a continuum elastoplastic modulus and path dependent strategy was quite stable and efficient. This latter observation has implications for advanced constitutive modeling since CPA with a continuum elastoplastic modulus avoids the need for evaluation of the second derivatives of the plastic potential function, making it easier to deal with complicated yield surfaces. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Worldwide, there is growing interest in the development of a rational reliability-based geotechnical design code. The reasons for this interest are at least two-fold; first, geotechnical engineers face significantly more uncertainties than those faced in other fields of engineering, therefore there is a need to properly characterize and deal with these uncertainties. Second, for decades, structural engineers have used a reliability-based design code, and there is a need to develop the same for geotechnical engineers, in order that the two groups can 'speak the same language'. This paper develops a theoretical model to predict the probability that a shallow foundation will exceed its supporting soil's bearing capacity. The footing is designed using characteristic soil properties (cohesion and friction angle) derived from a single sample, or 'core', taken in the vicinity of the footing, and used in a load and resistance factor design approach. The theory predicting failure probability is validated using a two-dimensional random finite element method analysis of a strip footing. Agreement between theory and simulation is found to be very good. Therefore, the theory can be used with confidence to perform risk assessments of foundation designs and develop resistance factors for use in code provisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Géotechnique is the property of Thomas Telford Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Application of the effective stress principle in unsaturated geotechnical engineering problems often requires explicit knowledge of the stress acting on the soil skeleton due to suction pore water pressure. This stress is defined herein as the suction stress. A theoretical formulation of suction stress profiles, based on the soil water characteristics curve, the soil permeability characteristic curve, and previous shear strength experimental verification, is developed. The theory provides a general quantitative way to calculate vertical suction stress profiles in various unsaturated soils under steady flow rate in the form of infiltration or evaporation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]