Search

Background and Aim: The clinical importance and management of vasospasm as a complication during endovascular stroke treatment (EVT) has not been well studied. We sought to investigate current expert opinions in neurointervention and therapeutic strategies of iatrogenic vasospasm during EVT., Methods: We conducted an anonymous international online survey (4 April 2023 to 15 May 2023) addressing treatment standards of neurointerventionalists (NIs) practising EVT. Several illustrative cases of patients with vasospasm during EVT were shown. Two study groups were compared according to the NI's opinion regarding the potential influence of vasospasm on patient outcome after EVT using descriptive analysis., Results: In total, 534 NI from 56 countries responded, of whom 51.5% had performed >200 EVT. Vasospasm was considered a complication potentially influencing the patient's outcome by 52.6% (group 1) whereas 47.4% did not (group 2). Physicians in group 1 more often added vasodilators to their catheter flushes during EVT routinely (43.7% vs 33.9%, p=0.033) and more often treated severe large-vessel vasospasm with vasodilators (75.3% vs 55.9%; p<0.001), as well as extracranial vasospasm (61.4% vs 36.5%, p<0.001) and intracranial medium-vessel vasospasm (27.1% vs 11.2%, p<0.001), compared with group 2. In case of a large-vessel vasospasm and residual and amenable medium-vessel occlusion during EVT, the study groups showed different treatment strategies. Group 2 continued the EVT immediately more often, without initiating therapy to treat the vasospasm first (9.6% vs 21.1%, p<0.001)., Conclusion: There is disagreement among NIs about the clinical relevance of vasospasm during EVT and its management. There was a higher likelihood of use of preventive and active vasodilator treatment in the group that perceived vasospasm as a relevant complication as well as differing interventional strategies for continuing an EVT in the presence of a large-vessel vasospasm., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The MR CLEAN-LATE trial provided evidence for the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke within the late window (after 6-24 h) in patients who were preselected based on the presence of collateral flow on CT angiography. We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes 2 years after randomisation., Methods: MR CLEAN-LATE was a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled trial conducted at 18 stroke intervention centres in the Netherlands. If endovascular treatment could be initiated within 6-24 h of symptom onset or last seen well, patients (aged 18 years or older) with an acute ischaemic stroke due to a large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation and at least some collateral flow in the affected middle cerebral artery territory on CT angiography were randomly assigned (1:1) to either endovascular treatment with best medical treatment (endovascular treatment group) or best medical treatment alone (control group). Web-based randomisation, stratified by centre, was performed with the use of permuted blocks (block size eight to 20). The researchers who collected clinical outcomes and analysed the results were masked to treatment allocation; treating physicians, local investigators, and patients were aware of the received treatment. The primary outcome of MR CLEAN-LATE was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days after randomisation. For this 2-year prespecified analysis, the primary outcome was mRS score at 2 years (minus 3 months to plus 6 months). Primary and safety analyses were performed based on the modified intention-to-treat principle, and included patients who provided (deferred) consent or died before consent could be obtained. Missing data were handled with multiple imputation by chained equations. The trial is completed and is registered at ISRCTN, ISRCTN19922220., Findings: Between Feb 2, 2018, and Jan 27, 2022, 535 patients were randomly assigned in the MR CLEAN-LATE trial, of whom 502 (94%) gave deferred consent and comprised the modified intention-to-treat population (255 in the endovascular treatment group and 247 in the control group). 261 (52%) patients were female and 241 (48%) were male. Data for mRS score at 2 years were available for 226 (89%) patients in the endovascular treatment group and for 202 (82%) patients in the control group. The median mRS score at 2 years was 4 (IQR 2-6) in the endovascular treatment group and 6 (2-6) in the control group. The endovascular treatment group demonstrated a shift towards better functional outcomes on the mRS (adjusted common odds ratio 1·41 [95% CI 1·00-1·99]; p=0·049). All-cause mortality at 2 years was 34% (87 of 255) in the endovascular treatment group and 41% (101 of 247) in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio 0·81 [95% CI 0·60-1·08]; p=0·15). Major vascular events (ie, transient ischaemic attack, ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, and cardiac events) were reported between 90 days and 2 years in 23 patients in the endovascular treatment group and 13 patients in the control group., Interpretation: Our results show that the effectiveness of late-window (after 6-24 h) endovascular treatment in improving clinical outcomes is sustained for up to 2 years in a population preselected based on the presence of collateral flow on CT angiography. This finding might be important for prompting further evaluations of cost-effectiveness, health-care policy development, and clinical decision making., Funding: The Dutch Organization for Health Research and Health Innovation (ZonMW), Collaboration for New Treatments of Acute Stroke Consortium, Dutch Heart Foundation, Stryker, Medtronic, Cerenovus, Health Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health, and the Netherlands Brain Foundation., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests RJvO and WHvZ report financial support for the current manuscript from the Collaboration for New Treatments of Acute Stroke (CONTRAST) consortium (which was financed for the current study by the Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative, an initiative of the Dutch Heart Foundation, the Netherlands Brain Foundation, Stryker, Medtronic, and Cerenovus), all paid to their institution. WHvZ reports speakers fees from Stryker, Cerenovus, Nicolab, Philips, Medtronic, and Microvention, and consulting fees from Philips, all paid to their institution; participated in the advisory boards of WeTrust (Philips) and ANAIS (Anaconda), all paid to their institution; and participated in the advisory board of InExtremis (CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France), for which no payments were received. YBWEMR reports being a minor shareholder of Nicolab. CBLMM reports grants from the Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative, an initiative of the Dutch Heart Foundation, TWIN Foundation, European Commission, Healthcare Evaluation Netherlands, Stryker, and Boehringer Ingelheim (all paid to their institution); and is a (minority interest) shareholder of Nicolab. AvdL reports financial support for this study by grants from The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, and the Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative, an initiative of the Dutch Heart Foundation, Brain Foundation Netherlands, Medtronic, and Cerenovus, all paid to their institution; reports grants from Stryker, Thrombolytic Science, Health Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health, Penumbra, GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Siemens Healthineers, all paid to their institution; participates in the advisory board of ESCAPE-MEVO; reports a speakers fee from Siemens Healthineers (paid to their institution); is a research leader of the CONTRAST consortium; and is part of the Research Cie of the European Society of Radiology. DWJD reports funding from the Dutch Heart Foundation, Netherlands Brain Foundation, the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Health Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health, Penumbra, Stryker, Medtronic, Thrombolytic Science, and Cerenovus (all unrestricted grants for research), paid to their institution; participated in the data safety monitoring board of the ACT Global, TESLA, and LATE-MT trial; and was the research leader for the CONTRAST Consortium until 2023. AAP reports a grant from Siemens Healthineers, paid to their institution. HDB reports an unrestricted grant from Stryker, paid to their institution. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Clinicians need simple and highly predictive prognostic scores to assist practical decision-making. We aimed to develop a simple outcome prediction score applied 24 hours after anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and validate it in patients treated both with and without endovascular thrombectomy., Methods: Using the HERMES (Highly Effective Reperfusion Evaluated in Multiple Endovascular Stroke Trials) collaboration data set (n=1764), patients in the endovascular thrombectomy arm were divided randomly into a derivation cohort (n=430) and a validation cohort (n=441). From a set of candidate predictors, logistic regression modeling using forward variable selection was used to select a model that was both parsimonious and highly predictive for modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2 at 90 days. The score was validated in validation cohort, control arm (n=893), and external validation cohorts from the ESCAPE-NA1 (Efficacy and Safety of Nerinetide for the Treatment of Acute Ischaemic Stroke; n=1066) and INTERRSeCT (Identifying New Approaches to Optimize Thrombus Characterization for Predicting Early Recanalization and Reperfusion With IV Alteplase and Other Treatments Using Serial CT Angiography; n=614)., Results: In the derivation cohort, we selected 2 significant predictors of mRS ≤2 (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at 24 hours and age [β-coefficient, 0.34 and 0.06]) and derived the HERMES-24 score: age (years)/10+National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at 24 hours. The HERMES-24 score was highly predictive for mRS ≤2 (c-statistic 0.907 [95% CI, 0.879-0.935]) in the derivation cohort. In the validation cohort and the control arm, the HERMES-24 score predicts mRS ≤2 (c-statistic, 0.914 [95% CI, 0.886-0.944] and 0.909 [95% CI, 0.887-0.930]). Observed provability of mRS ≤2 ranged between 3.1% and 3.4% when HERMES-24 score ≥25, while it ranged between 90.6% and 93.0% when HERMES-24 score <10 in the derivation cohort, validation cohort, and control arm. The HERMES-24 score also showed c-statistics of 0.894 and 0.889 for mRS ≤2 in the ESCAPE-NA1 and INTERRSeCT populations., Conclusions: The post-treatment HERMES-24 score is a simple validated score that predicts a 3-month outcome after anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke regardless of intervention, which helps prognostic discussion with families on day 2., Competing Interests: Dr Brown reports consulting for B. Braun Interventional Systems, Inc, Medtronic, MicroVention, Inc, and the University of Calgary and is employed by BRIGHT Research Partners. Dr Goyal reports grants from Medtronic, Stryker, MicroVention, and Mentice; consulting for Stryker, Microvention, and Mentice; and a patent for systems and methods for acute stroke diagnosis with GE Healthcare. Dr Menon reports stock holdings in Circle Neurovascular Imaging and compensation from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Campbell reports grants from Covidien, Medtronic, and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and fellowships from the National Heart Foundation of Australia, the National Stroke Foundation of Australia, and the Royal Australasian College of Physicians. Dr Mitchell reports consulting for Stryker and MicroVention and grants from Medtronic and Stryker. Dr Jovin reports consulting for Contego Medical; grants/contracts from Medtronic and Stryker; data safety monitoring board participation with Johnson & Johnson CERENOVUS; and stock holdings in Anaconda, Basking, Freeox Biotech, Galaxy, Gravity, Kandu, Methinks, Route92, StataDX, and Vizai. Dr Saver reports consulting for Abbott Laboratories, Aeromics, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, BrainQ, BrainsGate, CSL Behring, Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems, Medtronic, MindRhythm, Roche, and Stream Medical; data safety monitoring board participation with MIVI Neuroscience; and stock holdings in Neuronics Medical and Rapid Medical. Dr Muir reports consulting for Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Daiichi Sankyo. Dr White reports consulting for MicroVention and grants from the UK National Institutes for Health Research, MicroVention, Stryker, Medtronic, and Penumbra. Dr Bracard reports grants from the French Ministry of Health; others from GE Medical Systems; and nonfinancial support from MicroVention Europe. Dr Roos reports stock holdings in Nicolab. Dr van Zwam reports grants/contracts from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Stryker, and Johnson & Johnson; employment by Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum; and data safety monitoring board participation with Philips. Dr Hill reports consulting for BrainsGate; grants/contracts from Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Medtronic MicroVention, and NoNO; end point review committee participation with Merck; employment by the University of Calgary; and a patent for Systems and Methods for Assisting in Decision-Making and Triaging for Acute Stroke Patients with Circle Neurovascular Imaging. Dr Demchuk reports consulting for Boehringer Ingelheim, HLS Therapeutics, Hoffmann-La Roche, Medtronic, Nova-Signal, and Servier; data safety monitoring board participation with Philips and Lumosa; others from Novo Nordisk AS, Pfizer, and Astra Zeneca; and stock and patent for Stroke imaging software with Circle Neurovascular Imaging. The other authors report no conflicts.

Purpose: Intracranial aneurysms present significant health risks, as their rupture leads to subarachnoid haemorrhage, which in turn has high morbidity and mortality rates. There are several elements affecting the complexity of an intracranial aneurysm. However, criteria for defining a complex intracranial aneurysm (CIA) in open surgery and endovascular treatment could differ, and actually there is no consensus on the definition of a "complex" aneurysm. This DELPHI study aims to assess consensus on variables defining a CIA., Methods: An international panel of 50 members, representing various specialties, was recruited to define CIAs through a three-round Delphi process. The panelists participated in surveys with Likert scale responses and open-ended questions. Consensus criteria were established to determine CIA variables, and statistical analysis evaluated consensus and stability., Results: In open surgery, CIAs were defined by fusiform or blister-like shape, dissecting aetiology, giant size (≥ 25 mm), broad neck encasing parent arteries, extensive neck surface, wall calcification, intraluminal thrombus, collateral branch from the sac, location (AICA, SCA, basilar), vasospasm context, and planned bypass (EC-IC or IC-IC). For endovascular treatment, CIAs included giant size, very wide neck (dome/neck ratio ≤ 1:1), and collateral branch from the sac., Conclusions: The definition of aneurysm complexity varies by treatment modality. Since elements related to complexity differ between open surgery and endovascular treatment, these consensus criteria of CIAs could even guide in selecting the best treatment approach., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: To describe the incidence, risk factors, and prognostic relevance of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) immediately after endovascular treatment (EVT) for ischaemic stroke in the anterior circulation., Methods: EVT records from 2010 to 2019 were screened. Included patients underwent DECT within 3h post-EVT. Virtual native reconstructions were evaluated for ICH according to the Heidelberg criteria and grouped into Heidelberg classes (HCs): [HC1] haemorrhagic infarction (HI)1, HI2 and parenchymal haematoma (PH)1; [HC2] PH2; [HC3] i.a. intraventricular and subarachnoid haemorrhage. If ICH corresponding to multiple HCs was observed, we assumed that the (largest) parenchymal ICH would have the greatest prognostic impact. Hence, a single HC was attributed by the following order of severity: HC2, HC1, HC3. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. The effect of asymptomatic ICH (aICH) and symptomatic ICH (sICH) of (1) HC1 or HC2 and (2) HC3 on patient outcomes was evaluated with multivariable regression after multiple imputation., Results: Out of 651 records, 498 patients were included. Eighty-one (16%) patients showed ICH on post-EVT DECT, of which 19 were classified as HC1 (21% symptomatic), 6 as HC2 (100% symptomatic), and 56 as HC3 (14% symptomatic). ICH development was mainly associated with unfavourable procedural characteristics. Both aICH and sICH of HC1 or HC2 were associated with the mRS (aICH: adjusted [a]cOR 4.92, 95%CI [1.48-16.35]; sICH: acOR 12.97, 95%CI [2.39-70.26]) and mortality (aICH: aOR 10.08, 95%CI [2.48-40.88]; sICH: aOR 9.92, 95%CI [1.48-66.31]). Likewise, sICH of HC3 was associated with the mRS and mortality (acOR 19.91, 95%CI [4.03-98.35], and aOR 13.23, 95%CI [2.27-77.18], respectively). aICH of HC3 was not significantly associated with the mRS or mortality (acOR 0.87, 95%CI [0.48-1.57], and cOR 0.84, 95%CI [0.32-2.20], respectively)., Conclusions: Immediate post-EVT ICH is a frequent finding. Except for aICH of HC3, any ICH is associated with poor long-term clinical outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial or personal relationships that could be viewed as influencing the work reported in this paper. The authors declare the following financial or personal relationships that could be viewed as influencing the work reported in this paper: H.D. Boogaarts received consultation fees from Stryker Neurovascular (paid to the institution). W.H. van Zwam received consultation fees from Stryker, Nicolab and Cerenovus (paid to the institution), and is a DSMB member of the Philips’ We-Trust study, Anaconda's Solonda study, and In Extremis study (all funding paid to the institution). A.A. Postma received an institutional grant from Siemens Healthineers and Bayer Healthcare., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The MR CLEAN-LATE trial has shown that patient selection for endovascular treatment (EVT) in the late window (6-24 h after onset or last-seen-well) based on the presence of collateral flow on CT-angiography is safe and effective. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of late-window collateral-based EVT-selection compared to best medical management (BMM) over a lifetime horizon (until 95 years of age)., Materials and Methods: A model-based economic evaluation was performed from a societal perspective in The Netherlands. A decision tree was combined with a state-transition (Markov) model. Health states were defined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Initial probabilities at 3-months post-stroke were based on MR CLEAN-LATE data. Transition probabilities were derived from previous literature. Information on short- and long-term resource use and utilities was obtained from a study using MR CLEAN-LATE and cross-sectional data. All costs are expressed in 2022 euros. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at a rate of 4% and 1.5%, respectively. The effect of parameter uncertainty was assessed using probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA)., Results: On average, the EVT strategy cost €159,592 (95% CI: €140,830-€180,154) and generated 3.46 QALYs (95% CI: 3.04-3.90) per patient, whereas the costs and QALYs associated with BMM were €149,935 (95% CI: €130,841-€171,776) and 2.88 (95% CI: 2.48-3.29), respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per QALY and the incremental net monetary benefit were €16,442 and €19,710, respectively. At a cost-effectiveness threshold of €50,000/QALY, EVT was cost-effective in 87% of replications., Discussion and Conclusion: Collateral-based selection for late-window EVT is likely cost-effective from a societal perspective in The Netherlands., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by a grant from the Dutch organization for Health research and Health innovation (ZonMw). H.B. received consultation fees from Stryker Neurovascular (paid to the institution). A.P. received an institutional grant from Siemens Healthineers and Bayer Healthcare. W.Z. received consultation fees from Stryker, Nicolab and Cerenovus (paid to the institution), and is a DSMB member of the Philips’ We-Trust study, Anaconda’s Solonda study, and In Extremis study (all funding paid to the institution).

Background: Although CT perfusion (CTP) is often incorporated in acute stroke workflows, it remains largely unclear what the associated costs and health implications are in the long run of CTP-based patient selection for endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients presenting within 6 hours after symptom onset with a large vessel occlusion., Methods: Patients with a large vessel occlusion were included from a Dutch nationwide cohort (n=703) if CTP imaging was performed before EVT within 6 hours after stroke onset. Simulated cost and health effects during 5 and 10 years follow-up were compared between CTP based patient selection for EVT and providing EVT to all patients. Outcome measures were the net monetary benefit at a willingness-to-pay of €80 000 per quality-adjusted life year, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio), difference in costs from a healthcare payer perspective (ΔCosts) and quality-adjusted life years (ΔQALY) per 1000 patients for 1000 model iterations as outcomes., Results: Compared with treating all patients, CTP-based selection for EVT at the optimised ischaemic core volume (ICV≥110 mL) or core-penumbra mismatch ratio (MMR≤1.4) thresholds resulted in losses of health (median ΔQALYs for ICV≥110 mL: -3.3 (IQR: -5.9 to -1.1), for MMR≤1.4: 0.0 (IQR: -1.3 to 0.0)) with median ΔCosts for ICV≥110 mL of -€348 966 (IQR: -€712 406 to -€51 158) and for MMR≤1.4 of €266 513 (IQR: €229 403 to €380 110)) per 1000 patients. Sensitivity analyses did not yield any scenarios for CTP-based selection of patients for EVT that were cost-effective for improving health, including patients aged ≥80 years CONCLUSION: In EVT-eligible patients presenting within 6 hours after symptom onset, excluding patients based on CTP parameters was not cost-effective and could potentially harm patients., Competing Interests: Competing interests: BJE reports grants from LtC (ZonMW and TKI-PPP of Health Holland). WHvZ reports speaker fees from Cerenovus, NicoLab and Stryker, and consulting fees from Philips, all paid to Institution. DWJD report grants from the Dutch Heart Foundation, Brain Foundation Netherlands, ZON MW, Stryker, Medtronic, Cerenovus, Thrombolytic Science, received by the Erasmus University Medical Center outside this project. AJY reports Research grants from Medtronic, Cerenovus, Penumbra, Stryker, and Genentech. Consultant for Penumbra, Cerenovus, Nicolab, Philips, Vesalio, Zoll Circulation, and NIH/NINDS. CBM: grants from Healthcare Evaluation Netherlands, CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, TWIN foundation and Stryker during the conduct of the study and from European Commission outside this project (all paid to institution) and is shareholder of Nicolab. All other contributors report no other conflicts of interest., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The effectiveness of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before endovascular treatment (EVT) has been investigated in randomized trials and meta-analyses. These studies mainly concerned anterior circulation occlusions. We aimed to investigate clinical, technical, and safety outcomes of IVT before EVT in posterior circulation occlusions in a nationwide registry., Methods: Patients were included from the MR CLEAN Registry (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands), a nationwide, prospective, multicenter registry of patients with acute ischemic stroke due to a large intracranial vessel occlusion receiving EVT between 2014 and 2019. All patients with a posterior circulation occlusion were included. Primary outcome was a shift toward better functional outcome on the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale scores, 0-3), occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages, successful reperfusion (extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia ≥2B), first-attempt successful reperfusion, and mortality at 90 days. Regression analyses with adjustments based on univariable analyses and literature were applied., Results: A total of 248 patients were included, who received either IVT (n=125) or no IVT (n=123) before EVT. Results show no differences in a shift on the modified Rankin Scale (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.61-1.76]). Although symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages occurred more often in the IVT group (4.8% versus 2.4%), regression analysis did not show a significant difference (adjusted odds ratio, 1.65 [95% CI, 0.33-8.35]). Successful reperfusion, favorable functional outcome, first-attempt successful reperfusion, and mortality did not differ between patients treated with and without IVT., Conclusions: We found no significant differences in clinical, technical, and safety outcomes between patients with a large vessel occlusion in the posterior circulation treated with or without IVT before EVT. Our results are in line with the literature on the anterior circulation., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Majoie reports grants from the Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative, an initiative of the Dutch Heart Foundation, European Commission, Healthcare Evaluation Netherlands, Stichting Toegepast Wetenschappelijk Instituut voor Neuromodulatie Foundation, and Stryker (all paid to institution); and is a (minority interest) shareholder of Nicolab. Dr Emmer reports grants from leading the Change Healthcare Evaluation program, ZorgOnderzoek Nederland Medische Wetenschappen (ZonMw), Nico-Lab, and Top Consortia for Knowledge and Innovation- Public Private Partnership (TKI-PPP) Grant Topsector Lifesciences (all paid to institution); and participates as a representative of the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) Neuroradiology Dutch, and as Board member of the Dutch Society of Radiology. Dr Vos reports compensation from Stryker Corporation for other services. Dr van Doormaal reports consulting fees from Stryker, Siemens, and Stryker (all paid to institution); participates in the advisory board of DX Medical solutions; and is shareholder of DX Medical Solutions. Dr Yoo reports grants from Medtronic, Cerenovus, Penumbra, Stryker, Genentech, and Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices & Diagnostics Group, Latin America LLC; holds stock options in Nico-Lab, Insera; and is a consultant for Vesalio, Cerenovus, Rapid Medical Ltd, Penumbra, Inc, Nico-Lab, ZOLL Circulation, Inc, and Philips, all outside the submitted work; compensation from American Heart Association for other services; compensation from National Institutes of Health for data and safety monitoring services. Dr van Zwam reports speaker fees from Stryker, Cerenovus, and Nicolab, and consulting fees from Philips (all paid to institution); participated in the advisory boards of WeTrust (Philips) and ANAIS ([Advanced Neurovascular Access in Combination With a Stent Retriever in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke]; Anaconda; all paid to institution); and participated in the advisory boards of InEcxtremis (CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France) and DISTAL ([Endovascular Therapy Plus Best Medical Treatment (BMT) Versus BMT Alone for Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke - a Pragmatic, International, Multicentre, Randomized Trial]; University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland), studies for which no payments were received. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: The optimal anesthetic management for endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with posterior circulation stroke remains unclear. Our objective was to investigate the impact of early intubation in patients enrolled in the BASICS trial (Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study)., Methods: BASICS was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial that compared the efficacy of EVT compared with the best medical care alone in patients with basilar artery occlusion. In this post hoc analysis, early intubation within the first 24 hours of the estimated time of basilar artery occlusion was examined as an additional covariate using regression modeling. We estimated the adjusted relative risks (RRs) for favorable outcomes, defined as modified Rankin Scale scores of 0 to 3 at 90 days. An adjusted common odds ratio was estimated for a shift in the distribution of modified Rankin Scale scores at 90 days., Results: Of 300 patients in BASICS, 289 patients were eligible for analysis (151 in the EVT group and 138 in the best medical care group). compared with medical care alone, EVT was related to a higher risk of early intubation (RR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.09-1.53]; P <0.01), and early intubation was negatively associated with favorable outcome (RR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.45-0.84]; P =0.002). Whereas there was no overall treatment effect of EVT on favorable outcome (RR, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.95-1.55]; P =0.121), EVT was associated with favorable outcome (RR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.05-1.71]; P =0.018) and a shift toward lower modified Rankin Scale scores (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.04-2.57]; P =0.033) if adjusted for early intubation., Conclusions: In this post hoc analysis of the neutral BASICS trial, early intubation was linked to unfavorable outcomes, which might mitigate a potential benefit from EVT by indirect effects due to an increased risk of early intubation. This relationship may be considered when assessing the efficacy of EVT in patients with basilar artery occlusion in future trials., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr van Zwam reports grants from Stryker Corporation; grants from Johnson and Johnson International; and compensation from Philips for data and safety monitoring services. Dr Roos reports stock holdings in Nicolab. Dr Yoo reports stock holdings in Insera; compensation from Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices & Diagnostics Group—Latin America, LLC, for consultant services; grants from Genentech USA, Inc to other; compensation from Vesalio for consultant services; compensation from American Heart Association for other services; compensation from ZOLL Circulation Inc for consultant services; compensation from Penumbra Inc for consultant services; stock options in Nicolab; employment by HCA Healthcare; compensation from Penumbra Inc for consultant services; grants from Penumbra Inc to other; grants from Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices & Diagnostics Group—Latin America, LLC, to other; grants from Stryker to other; compensation from National Institutes of Health for data and safety monitoring services; grants from Medtronic to other; compensation from Nicolab for consultant services; and compensation from Philips for consultant services. Dr Pontes-Neto reports compensation from Medtronic for other services; compensation from Bayer for other services; and compensation from Pfizer for other services. Dr Mazighi reports compensation from Acticor Biotech for consultant services and compensation from Boerhinger-Ingelheim for consultant services. Dr Audebert reports being the current president of the PREhospital Stroke Treatment Organization (PRESTO), compensation from Novo Nordisk for data monitoring committee services, grants from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Innovation Funds of the Joint Federal Committee (g-BA) and compensation from Bayer Healthcare, Pfizer for consultant services, grants from Pfizer, grants from BMS, grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and grants from Sanofi. Dr Michel reports grants from University of Lausanne to other; grants from Swiss Heart Foundation to other; and grants from Swiss National Science Foundation to other.

Background: Intravenous alteplase treatment (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke carries a risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). However, reperfusion of an occluded vessel itself may contribute to the risk of ICH. We determined whether IVT and reperfusion are associated with ICH or its volume in the Multicenter Randomized Clinical trial of Endovascular treatment for Acute ischemic stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN)-NO IV trial., Methods: The MR CLEAN-NO IV trial randomized patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion to receive either IVT followed by endovascular treatment (EVT) or EVT alone. ICH was classified according to the Heidelberg bleeding classification on follow-up MRI or CT approximately 8 hours-7 days after stroke. Hemorrhage volume was measured with ITK-snap. Successful reperfusion was defined as extended Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) score of 2b-3. Multinomial and binary adjusted logistic regression were used to determine the association of IVT and reperfusion with ICH subtypes., Results: Of 539 included patients, 173 (32%) developed ICH and 30 suffered from symptomatic ICH (sICH) (6%). Of the patients with ICH, 102 had hemorrhagic infarction, 47 had parenchymal hematoma, 44 had SAH, and six had other ICH. Reperfusion was associated with a decreased risk of SAH, and IVT was not associated with SAH (eTICI 2b-3: adjusted OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.97; EVT without IVT: OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.8). Reperfusion status and IVT were not associated with overall ICH, hemorrhage volume, and sICH (sICH: EVT without IVT, OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.25; eTICI 2b-3, OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.05)., Conclusion: Neither IVT administration before EVT nor successful reperfusion after EVT were associated with ICH, hemorrhage volume, and sICH. SAH occurred more often in patients for whom successful reperfusion was not achieved., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CBLM reports grants from CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation and Stryker (related and paid to institution), and TWIN Foundation, European Commission, Health Evaluation Netherlands (outside the submitted work and paid to institution); and is shareholder of Nico.lab. HAM is cofounder and shareholder of Nico.lab. DWJD and Van der Lugt report grants from Dutch Heart Foundation, Dutch Brain Foundation, Health Holland, Stryker, Medtronic Penumbra, Cerenovus and Thrombolytic Science Inc, all paid to the institution. YDWR is shareholder of Nico.lab. JMC reports research support from Medtronic (paid to institution). All other authors have nothing to disclose., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke is one of the most effective treatments in medicine in the past few years, despite a serious risk of reperfusion bleeding. The Dutch guideline recommended treating patients within 6-24 hours from onset only in case of an infarct core 25 ml or less and a penumbra of at least the same size. These criteria need modification, considering the results of ANGEL-ASPECT, SELECT2 AND MR CLEAN LATE. Thrombectomy in several patients whose intervention was previously thought to be futile or dangerous has now been proven highly effective. The criteria for treatment in the later time window (> 6 hours since onset) are not very easy to implement, but here the recently published MR CLEAN LATE can offer solace: it confirmed that selection of patients in the late time window can be based on collateral circulation, so that ASPECT score and CT perfusion no longer have to be decisive.

Purpose: To determine the incidence and predictors of cerebral arterial air emboli (CAAE) on immediate post-endovascular treatment (EVT) dual-energy CT (DECT) in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients, and describe their association with clinical outcomes., Methods: EVT records from 2010 to 2019 were screened. Exclusion criteria included intracerebral haemorrhage on post-EVT DECT. In the affected middle cerebral artery (MCA)-territory, circular and linear (length ≥ 1.5*width) CAAE were counted. Clinical data were collected from prospective records. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days was the primary outcome. Multivariable linear, logistic, and ordinal regression were used to analyse the effect of (1) linear CAAE and (2) isolated circular CAAE., Results: Out of 651 EVT-records, 402 patients were included. In 65 patients (16%), at least one linear CAAE was found in the affected MCA-territory. 17 patients (4%) showed isolated circular CAAE. Multivariable regression showed an association between both the presence and the number of linear CAAE and the mRS at 90 days (presence: adjusted (a)cOR 3.10, 95%CI 1.75-5.50; number: acOR 1.28, 95%CI 1.13-1.44), NIHSS at 24-48 h (presence: aβ 4.15, 95%CI 1.87-6.43; number: aβ 0.88, 95%CI 0.42-1.34), mortality at 90 days (presence: aOR 3.34, 95%CI 1.51-7.40; number: aOR 1.24, 95%CI 1.08-1.43) and stroke progression (presence: aOR 4.01, 95%CI 1.96-8.18; number: aOR 1.31, 95%CI 1.15-1.50). Isolated circular CAAE were not significantly associated with any outcome measure., Conclusion: CAAE were found frequently on post-EVT CT imaging. The presence and the number of linear CAAE, but not circular CAAE, are associated with unfavourable short- and long-term clinical outcomes., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Background: We assessed whether the treatment effect of intravenous alteplase (IVT) prior to endovascular treatment (EVT) on functional outcome is modified by time metrics., Methods: We used data from all patients included in MR CLEAN-NO IV, a randomized trial of IVT followed by EVT versus EVT alone in patients who presented directly to EVT-capable hospitals. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. We used ordinal regression with a multiplicative interaction term to assess if the effect of IVT is modified by onset-to-randomization (OTR), onset-to-IV-needle (OTN), door-to-groin (DTG) or needle-to-groin (NTG) times. Secondary outcomes included successful reperfusion (extended Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction Scale 2b-3) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH)., Results: In 539 included patients (266 allocated to IVT+EVT and 273 to EVT alone), median workflow times were OTR: 93 (IQR 71-145) min; OTN: 98 (IQR 75-156) min; DTG: 64 (IQR 51-78) min; and NTG: 28 (IQR 20-41) min. There was a significant association between worse outcomes and longer time intervals for all metrics except NTG. We found no interaction between any of the time metrics and IVT for the effect on functional outcome (p values for interaction: OTR=0.40, OTN=0.39, DTG=0.61, NTG=0.56). We also did not observe any significant interaction for successful reperfusion or sICH., Conclusion: In MR CLEAN-NO IV, the effect of IVT prior to EVT was not modified by OTR, OTN, DTG or NTG times. Our results do not support the use of these metrics to guide IVT treatment decisions prior to EVT in comprehensive stroke centres., Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN80619088., Competing Interests: Competing interests: WHvZ reports speaker fees from Cerenovus, Stryker European Operations BV and NicoLab, paid to institution. DWJD reports grants for research from the Dutch Heart Foundation, Brain Foundation Netherlands, The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, Health Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health, and unrestricted grants from Penumbra, Stryker European Operations BV, Medtronic, Thrombolytic Science and Cerenovus, all paid to institution. YBWEMR is a minor shareholder of Nico.lab. JMC received unrelated research support from The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Dr C J Vaillant Foundation, Bayer, Boehringer, Portola. All fees were paid to his employer. CBLMM reports grants from TWIN Foundation, related to MR CLEAN Registry, paid to institution, and unrelated grants from CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, European Commission, Dutch Health Evaluation Program, Stryker (all paid to institution), shareholder Nico-lab. BJE reports grants from Health Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health as well as from the Leading the Change Program (The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development), both paid to institution. NLC reports an honorarium for a short presentation at the American Academy of Neurology 2022. The other authors report no conflicts., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Thrombus radiomics (TR) describe complex shape and textural thrombus imaging features. We aimed to study the relationship of TR extracted from non-contrast CT with procedural and functional outcome in endovascular-treated patients with acute ischemic stroke., Methods: Thrombi were segmented on thin-slice non-contrast CT (≤1 mm) from 699 patients included in the MR CLEAN Registry. In a pilot study, we selected 51 TR with consistent values across two raters' segmentations (ICC >0.75). Random forest models using TR in addition or as a substitute to baseline clinical variables (CV) and manual thrombus measurements (MTM) were trained with 499 patients and evaluated on 200 patients for predicting successful reperfusion (extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia (eTICI) ≥2B), first attempt reperfusion, reperfusion within three attempts, and functional independence (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2). Three texture and shape features were selected based on feature importance and related to eTICI ≥2B, number of attempts to eTICI ≥2B, and 90-day mRS with ordinal logistic regression., Results: Random forest models using TR, CV or MTM had comparable predictive performance. Thrombus texture (inverse difference moment normalized) was independently associated with reperfusion (adjusted common OR (acOR) 0.85, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.99). Thrombus volume and texture were also independently associated with the number of attempts to successful reperfusion (acOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.88 and acOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.49)., Conclusions: TR describing thrombus volume and texture were associated with more attempts to successful reperfusion. Compared with models using CV and MTM, TR had no added value for predicting procedural and functional outcome., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Amsterdam UMC received funds from Stryker for consultations by CBLMM and YBWEMR. Unrelated to this study, Amsterdam UMC received grants from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, Health Holland Top Sector LSH and Nicolab. Dr Dippel and AvdL report unrestricted grants from Stryker, Penumbra, Medtronic, Cerenovus, Thrombolytic Science, LLC, Dutch Heart Foundation, Brain Foundation Netherlands, The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, and Health Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health for research, paid to institution. Maastricht University Medical Center received funds from Stryker, Cerenovus, Nicolab and Philips for consultation by WHvZ. NAT received funding from the AMC Medical Research. PRK is funded by INSIST: a European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program. YBWEMR is minor shareholder of Nicolab. HAM is co-founder and shareholder of Nicolab. CBLMM reports a grant from the TWIN Foundation. Unrelated to this study, CBLMM is a minor shareholder of Nicolab and reports grants from CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, European Commission, Health Evaluation Netherlands, and Stryker, all paid to institution., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Pre-stroke dependent patients (modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) ≥3) were excluded from most trials on endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in the anterior circulation. Therefore, little evidence exists for EVT in those patients. We aimed to investigate the safety and benefit of EVT in pre-stroke patients with mRS score 3., Methods: We used data from the Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN) Registry. All patients treated with EVT for anterior circulation AIS with pre-stroke mRS 3 were included. We assessed causes for dependence and compared patients with successful reperfusion (defined as expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia scale (eTICI) 2b-3) to patients without successful reperfusion. We used regression analyses with pre-specified adjustments. Our primary outcome was 90-day mRS 0-3 (functional improvement or return to baseline)., Results: A total of 192 patients were included, of whom 82 (43%) had eTICI <2b and 108 (56%) eTICI ≥2b. The median age was 80 years (IQR 73-87). Fifty-one of the 192 patients (27%) suffered from previous stroke and 36/192 (19%) had cardiopulmonary disease. Patients with eTICI ≥2b more often returned to their baseline functional state or improved (n=26 (26%) vs n=15 (19%); adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.91 (95% CI 1.08 to 7.82)) and had lower mortality rates (n=49 (49%) vs n=50 (64%); aOR 0.42 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.93)) compared with patients with eTICI <2b., Conclusions: Although patients with AIS with pre-stroke mRS 3 comprise a heterogenous group of disability causes, we observed improved outcomes when patients achieved successful reperfusion after EVT., Competing Interests: Competing interests: WHvZ: Speaker fees from Stryker, Cerenovus, NicoLab (all paid to institution). MG: consultant (Medtronic, Stryker, Mentice, Microvention), license agreement (GE Healthcare, Microvention). AG: reports membership of editorial boards of Neurology, Neurology: Clinical Practice, and Stroke; research support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canadian Cardiovascular Society, Campus Alberta Neuroscience, and Alberta Innovates; consultation fees from MD Analytics, CTC Communications Corp, MyMedicalPanel, and Atheneum; stock options from SnapDx, TheRounds.com, and Advanced Health Analytics (AHA Health Ltd); and a provisional patent application for a system for delivery of remote ischemic conditioning or other cuff-based therapies. JO: consultant (NICO.Lab). CBLM: grants from TWIN Foundation during the conduct of the study (paid to institution); grants from CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, grants from European Commission, grants from Health Evaluation Netherlands, grants from Stryker outside the submitted work (paid to institution); and is a shareholder of Nico-lab., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: A larger thrombus in patients with acute ischemic stroke might result in more complex endovascular treatment procedures, resulting in poorer patient outcomes. Current evidence on thrombus volume and length related to procedural and functional outcomes remains contradicting. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of thrombus volume and thrombus length and whether this relationship differs between first-line stent retrievers and aspiration devices for endovascular treatment., Methods: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, 670 of 3279 patients from the MR CLEAN Registry (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands) for endovascularly treated large vessel occlusions were included. Thrombus volume (0.1 mL) and length (0.1 mm) based on manual segmentations and measurements were related to reperfusion grade (expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction score) after endovascular treatment, the number of retrieval attempts, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and a shift for functional outcome at 90 days measured with the reverted ordinal modified Rankin Scale (odds ratio >1 implies a favorable outcome). Univariable and multivariable linear and logistic regression were used to report common odds ratios (cORs)/adjusted cOR and regression coefficients (B/aB) with 95% CIs. Furthermore, a multiplicative interaction term was used to analyze the relationship between first-line device choice, stent retrievers versus aspiration device, thrombus volume, and outcomes., Results: Thrombus volume was associated with functional outcome (adjusted cOR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.71-0.97]) and number of retrieval attempts (aB, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.16-0.28]) but not with the other outcome measures. Thrombus length was only associated with functional independence (adjusted cOR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.24-0.85]). Patients with more voluminous thrombi had worse functional outcomes if endovascular treatment was based on first-line stent retrievers (interaction cOR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.50-0.89]; P =0.005; adjusted cOR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.55-1.0]; P =0.04)., Conclusions: In this study, patients with a more voluminous thrombus required more endovascular thrombus retrieval attempts and had a worse functional outcome. Patients with a lengthier thrombus were less likely to achieve functional independence at 90 days. For more voluminous thrombi, first-line stent retrieval compared with first-line aspiration might be associated with worse functional outcome.

Background: Early neurological deterioration (END) after endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is associated with poor outcome. END may remain unexplained by parenchymal hemorrhage (UnEND). We aim to analyze the risk factors of UnEND in the medical management (MM) and EVT arms of the HERMES study., Methods: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of anterior AIS patients who underwent EVT for proximal anterior occlusions. Risk factors of UnEND, defined as a worsening of ≥4 points between baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and NIHSS at 24 hours without hemorrhage, were compared between both arms using mixed logistic regression models adjusted for baseline characteristics. An interaction analysis between the EVT and MM arms for risk factors of UnEND was conducted., Results: Among 1723 patients assessable for UnEND, 160 patients experienced an UnEND (9.3%), including 9.1% (78/854) in the EVT arm and 9.4% (82/869) in the MM arm. There was no significant difference in the incidence of UnEND between the two study arms. In the EVT population, independent risk factors of UnEND were lower baseline NIHSS, higher baseline glucose, and lower collateral grade. In the MM population, the only independent predictor of UnEND was higher baseline glucose. However, we did not demonstrate an interaction between EVT and MM for baseline factors as risk factors of UnEND. UnEND was, similarly in both treatment groups, a significant predictor of unfavorable outcome in both the EVT (p<0.001) and MM (p<0.001) arms., Conclusions: UnEND is not an uncommon event, with a similar rate which ever treatment arm is considered. In the clinical scenario of AIS due to large vessel occlusion, no patient-related factor seems to increase the risk for UnEND when treated by EVT compared with MM., Competing Interests: Competing interests: PW is member of the editorial board of the Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is performed in intervention centers that provide the full range of neuro(endo)vascular care (level 1) and centers that only perform EVT for AIS (level 2). We compared outcomes between these center types and assessed whether differences in outcomes could be explained by center volume (CV)., Patients and Methods: We analyzed patients included in the MR CLEAN Registry (2014-2018), a registry of all EVT-treated patients in the Netherlands. Our primary outcome was the shift on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) after 90 days (ordinal regression). Secondary outcomes were the NIHSS 24-48 h post-EVT, door-to-groin time (DTGT), procedure time (linear regression), and recanalization (binary logistic regression). We compared outcomes between level 1 and 2 centers using multilevel regression models, with center as random intercept. We adjusted for relevant baseline factors, and in case of observed differences, we additionally adjusted for CV., Results: Of the 5144 patients 62% were treated in level 1 centers. We observed no significant differences between center types in mRS (adjusted(a)cOR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.40 to 1.54), NIHSS (aβ: 0.31, 95% CI: -0.52 to 1.14), procedure duration (aβ: 0.88, 95% CI: -5.21 to 6.97), or DTGT (aβ: 4.24, 95% CI: -7.09 to 15.57). The probability for recanalization was higher in level 1 centers compared to level 2 centers (aOR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.33), and this difference probably depended on CV., Conclusions: We found no significant differences, that were independent of CV, in the outcomes of EVT for AIS between level 1 and level 2 intervention centers., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: DWJD reports funding from the Dutch Heart Foundation, Brain Foundation Netherlands, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Health Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health, and unrestricted grants from Penumbra Inc., Stryker, Medtronic, Thrombolytic Science, LLC, and Cerenovus for research, all paid to the institution. DWJD participated in the DSMBs of ESCAPE-NEXT (stopped July 2021) and TESLAT (without receiving payments). AAP reports an institutional grant from Siemens Healthineers & Bayer Healthcare. WHvZ received consultation fees from Stryker, Nico.Lab and Cerenovus, paid to the institution. WHvZ participates in the DSMBs of Philips’WeTrust study, Anaconda’s Solonda study, in Extremis Studies, Montpellier, all funding was paid to the institution. YBWEMR reports being a minor share-holder of Nico-Lab, not related to the current work., (© European Stroke Organisation 2022.)

Introduction: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) increases the chance of good functional outcome after ischemic stroke caused by a large vessel occlusion, but the risk of death in the first 90 days is still considerable. We assessed the causes, timing and risk factors of death after EVT to aid future studies aiming to reduce mortality., Patients and Methods: We used data from the MR CLEAN Registry, a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study of patients treated with EVT in the Netherlands between March 2014, and November 2017. We assessed causes and timing of death and risk factors for death in the first 90 days after treatment. Causes and timing of death were determined by reviewing serious adverse event forms, discharge letters, or other written clinical information. Risk factors for death were determined with multivariable logistic regression., Results: Of 3180 patients treated with EVT, 863 (27.1%) died in the first 90 days. The most common causes of death were pneumonia (215 patients, 26.2%), intracranial hemorrhage (142 patients, 17.3%), withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment because of the initial stroke (110 patients, 13.4%) and space-occupying edema (101 patients, 12.3%). In total, 448 patients (52% of all deaths) died in the first week, with intracranial hemorrhage as most frequent cause. The strongest risk factors for death were hyperglycemia and functional dependency before the stroke and severe neurological deficit at 24-48 h after treatment., Discussion and Conclusion: When EVT fails to decrease the initial neurological deficit, strategies to prevent complications like pneumonia and intracranial hemorrhage after EVT could improve survival, as these are often the cause of death., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: WMS is supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (634809). CBLMM received funds from TWIN Foundation (related to this project, paid to institution), CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, Stryker, European Commission, Healthcare Evaluation Netherlands (unrelated to this project; paid to institution) and is shareholder of Nicolab. HBvdW has received speaker’s fees from Bayer and Boehringer Ingelheim; served as a consultant to Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and LivaNova; and reports grants from Stryker., (© European Stroke Organisation 2022.)

Introduction: The THRIVE score and the THRIVE-c calculation are validated ischemic stroke outcome prediction tools based on patient variables that are readily available at initial presentation. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the benefit of endovascular treatment (EVT) for many patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO), and pooled data from these trials allow for adaptation of the THRIVE-c calculation for use in shared clinical decision making regarding EVT., Methods: To extend THRIVE-c for use in the context of EVT, we extracted data from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA) from 7 RCTs of EVT. Models were built in a randomly selected development cohort using logistic regression that included the predictors from THRIVE-c: age, NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and/or atrial fibrillation, as well as randomization to EVT and, where available, the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS)., Results: Good outcome was achieved in 366/787 (46.5%) of subjects randomized to EVT and in 236/795 (29.7%) of subjects randomized to control (P < 0.001), and the improvement in outcome with EVT was seen across age, NIHSS, and THRIVE-c good outcome prediction. Models to predict outcome using THRIVE elements (age, NIHSS, and comorbidities) together with EVT, with or without ASPECTS, had similar performance by ROC analysis in the development and validation cohorts (THRIVE-EVT ROC area under the curve (AUC) = 0.716 in development, 0.727 in validation, P = 0.30; THRIVE-EVT + ASPECTS ROC AUC = 0.718 in development, 0.735 in validation, P = 0.12)., Conclusion: THRIVE-EVT may be used alongside the original THRIVE-c calculation to improve outcome probability estimation for patients with acute ischemic stroke, including patients with or without LVO, and to model the potential improvement in outcomes with EVT for an individual patient based on variables that are available at initial presentation. Online calculators for THRIVE-c estimation are available at www.thrivescore.org and www.mdcalc.com/thrive-score-for-stroke-outcome.

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion in acute ischaemic stroke is the standard of care when initiated within 6 hours of stroke onset, and is performed between 6-24 hours using advanced neuroimaging (CT perfusion or MR imaging) for patients who meet the strict imaging selection criteria. However, adherence to the restrictive imaging criteria recommended by current guidelines is impeded in many parts of the world, including the UK, by resource constraints and limited access to advanced neuroimaging in the emergency setting. Furthermore, recent randomised and non-randomised studies have demonstrated that patients selected without advanced neuroimaging (with non-contrast CT and CT angiography only) using less restrictive imaging criteria for EVT eligibility beyond 6 hours from onset still benefited from EVT treatment, thereby increasing the proportion of patients eligible for EVT and widening the potential treatment impact at a population level. Hence, current guidelines should be updated expeditiously to reflect the level I evidence in support of more liberal imaging selection criteria for patients presenting with acute ischaemic stroke due to a large vessel occlusion., (© Royal College of Physicians 2023. All rights reserved.)

Background: Higher expanded Treatment In Cerebral Ischemia (eTICI) reperfusion scores after endovascular treatment (EVT) are associated with better outcomes. However, the influence of the number of passes on this association is unclear. We aimed to compare outcomes of single-pass good reperfusion (eTICI 2B) with multiple-pass excellent/complete reperfusion (eTICI 2C/3) in daily clinical practice., Methods: We compared outcomes of patients in the MR CLEAN Registry with good reperfusion (eTICI 2B) in a single pass to those with excellent/complete reperfusion (eTICI 2C/3) in multiple passes. Regression models were used to investigate the association of single-pass eTICI 2B versus multiple-pass eTICI 2C/3 reperfusion with 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS)), functional independence (mRS 0-2), per-procedural complications and safety outcomes., Results: We included 699 patients: 178 patients with single-pass eTICI 2B, and 242 and 279 patients with eTICI 2C/3 after 2 and ≥3 passes, respectively. Patients with eTICI 2C/3 after 2 or ≥3 passes did not achieve significantly better functional outcomes compared with patients with single-pass eTICI 2B (adjusted common OR (acOR) 1.06, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.50 and acOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.05 for 90-day mRS, and adjusted OR (aOR) 1.24, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.97 and aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.22 for functional independence)., Conclusions: Our results did not show better outcomes for patients who achieved eTICI 2C/3 in multiple, that is, two or more, passes when compared with patients with single-pass eTICI 2B. However, this concerns observational data. Further research is necessary to investigate the per-pass effect in relation to reperfusion and functional outcome., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Amsterdam UMC received funds from Stryker for consultation by CBLM. Unrelated to this study, Amsterdam UMC received grants from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, Health Holland Top Sector LSH and Nicolab B.V. Erasmus University Medical Center received funds from Stryker, Siemens Healthineers, GE Healthcare and Bracco Imaging for consultation by DWJD. Maastricht University Medical Center received funds from Stryker, Cerenovus, Nicolab B.V. and Philips for consultation by WvZ. JMC reports a grant from Medtronic, all fees paid to institution. HAM is co-founder and shareholder of Nicolab B.V. Dr Charles BLM Majoie reports grants from the TWIN Foundation, CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, European Commission, Health Evaluation Netherlands, and Stryker, all paid to the institution. CBLM is minor shareholder of Nicolab B.V. Dr Bart J Emmer reports a TKI-Private PPP Grant from the Dutch Ministry of Economics. The other authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The eCLIPs bifurcation remodelling system is a non-circumferential implant that bridges the neck from outside of a bifurcation aneurysm. The goal of the multicenter, post-marketing European eCLIPs Safety, FeasIbility, and Efficacy Study (EESIS), was to present the efficacy and safety results of the eCLIPs device after 365 days of follow-up., Methods: All patients were to receive an eCLIPs in conjunction with coils. The study was conducted according to good clinical practices and included independent adjudication of safety and efficacy outcomes., Results: Twenty patients were enrolled at four European centers. Mean age was 60 years (range 41-74) and aneurysms were located at the basilar tip (n=19) and carotid tip (n=1). Average aneurysm dome height was 6.0 mm (range 2.0-15.0). Mean neck length was 5.1 mm (range 2.6-8.5). The technical success rate was 90% (18 of 20). No major territorial strokes or deaths occurred between the index procedure and after 365 days of follow-up. Complete occlusion was achieved in 60% of patients (12 of 20 patients) and 67% of patients with an eCLIPs device (12 of 18) after 365 days of follow-up. Adequate occlusion (complete occlusion and neck remnant) was achieved in 80% of patients (16 of 20 patients) and 89% of patients with an eCLIPs device (16 of 18 patients) after 365 days of follow-up., Conclusion: In this small series, treatment with eCLIPs was feasible, safe, and efficacious, considering the challenging nature of the aneurysms., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02607501., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JDV: consultant for Stryker Neurovascular and Evasc. LS: consultant for Evasc. HDB: consultant for Stryker Neurovascular and Evasc. WHvZ: speaker fees from Stryker, Cerenovus, and NicoLab; consultancy fees from Philips. TRM: co-inventor of eCLIPs and equity position at Evasc., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: The beneficial effect of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) on clinical outcome is assumed to be caused by reduced follow-up infarct volume (FIV), which could serve as an early imaging endpoint. However, the effect of EVT on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was poorly explained by FIV. NIHSS at 5-7 days could be a more specific measure of the effect of reperfusion therapy, as opposed to the mRS at 3 months. Therefore, we aimed to assess to what extent the effect of EVT on NIHSS is explained by FIV., Materials and Methods: We used data from the MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands; n = 500) trial to evaluate the mediating role of FIV within 1 week in the relationship between EVT and baseline adjusted NIHSS at 5-7 days., Results: Larger FIVs were associated with higher NIHSS after treatment (adjusted beta-coefficient (aβ) 0.47;95%CI 0.39-0.55). EVT was associated with smaller FIVs (β -0.35;95%CI-0.64 to -0.06) and lower NIHSS (β -0.63;95%CI-0.90 to -0.35). After adjustment for FIV, the effect of EVT on NIHSS decreased (aβ -0.47;95%CI-0.72 to -0.23), indicating that effect of EVT on neurologic deficit is partially mediated by FIV. Reduction of FIV explained 34% (95%CI;5%-93%) of the effect of EVT on the NIHSS at 5-7 days., Conclusions: Larger FIV was significantly associated with larger neurological deficits after treatment. Reduced infarct volume after EVT explains one third of treatment benefit in terms of neurological deficit. This suggests that FIV is of interest as an imaging biomarker of stroke treatment effect., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The relationship between the interventionist's experience and outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation, is unclear., Objective: To assess the effect of the interventionist's level of experience on clinical, imaging, and workflow outcomes. Secondly, to determine which of the three experience definitions is most strongly associated with these outcome measures., Methods: We analysed data from 2700 patients, included in the MR CLEAN Registry. We defined interventionist's experience as the number of procedures performed in the year preceding the intervention (EXPfreq), total number of procedures performed (EXPno), and years of experience (EXPyears). Our outcomes were the baseline-adjusted National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at 24-48 hours post-EVT, recanalization (extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) score ≥2B), and procedural duration. We used multilevel regression models with interventionists as random intercept. For EXPfreq and EXPno results were expressed per 10 procedures., Results: Increased EXPfreq was associated with lower 24-48 hour NIHSS scores (adjusted (a)β:-0.46, 95% CI -0.70 to -0.21). EXPno and EXPyears were not associated with short-term neurological outcomes. Increased EXPfreq and EXPno were both associated with recanalization (aOR=1.20, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.31 and aOR=1.08, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.12, respectively), and increased EXPfreq, EXPno, and EXPyears were all associated with shorter procedure times (aβ:-3.08, 95% CI-4.32 to -1.84; aβ:-1.34, 95% CI-1.84 to -0.85; and aβ:-0.79, 95% CI-1.45 to -0.13, respectively)., Conclusions: Higher levels of interventionist's experience are associated with better outcomes after EVT, in particular when experience is defined as the number of patients treated in the preceding year. Every 20 procedures more per year is associated with approximately one NIHSS score point decrease, an increased probability for recanalization (aOR=1.44), and a 6-minute shorter procedure time., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DWJD reports funding from the Dutch Heart Foundation, Brain Foundation Netherlands, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Health Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health, and unrestricted grants from Penumbra Inc., Stryker European Operations BV, Medtronic, Thrombolytic Science, LLC, and Cerenovus for research, all paid to the institution. DWJD participates in the DSMBs of ESCAPE-NEXT (stopped July 2021) and TESLAT (without receiving payments). WHvZ received consultation fees from Stryker, Nico Lab, and Cerenovus, paid to the institution. WHvZ participates in the DSMBs of Philips’WeTrust study, Anaconda’s Solonda study, in Extremis Studies, Montpellier, all funding was paid to the institution. BJE received grants from the Dutch Research Foundation (ZonMW), Dutch Ministery of Economy (TKI-PPP), and Nico Lab, all paid to the institution. CvdL participates in the Secretary Dutch Interventional Society (unpaid). SMJvK reports participation in DSMBs of multiple studies as a statistician, none in the same clinical field. JS participates in the executive committee of the MR CLEAN MED, unpaid. MU received grants from the Dutch Heart Foundation, paid to the CONTRAST consortium. MU also received financial support for interventional workshops and travel visits paid to Microvention, Stryker, Cerenovus. PJvD received consultation fees and payments/honoraria from Stryker, paid to the institution., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: We aimed to assess whether the effect of intravenous alteplase treatment (IVT) before endovascular treatment (EVT) on outcome is modified by first-line technique during EVT in IVT eligible patients., Methods: This was a post hoc analysis from MR CLEAN-NO IV (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands - Intravenous Treatment Followed by Intra-Arterial Treatment Versus Direct Intra-Arterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke Caused by a Proximal Intracranial Occlusion), a randomized trial of IVT followed by EVT versus EVT alone in patients presenting directly to EVT-capable centers. We included data from all patients who underwent EVT with a thrombectomy attempt. We compared patients treated with stent retriever (with or without aspiration) to aspiration alone as first-line EVT technique and assessed the interaction of first-line EVT technique with IVT treatment. Primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score, analyzed with mixed model ordinal regression for a shift towards better outcome. Secondary outcomes included successful reperfusion (extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3)., Results: Of 473 included patients, 102 (21.6%) were treated with aspiration alone as first-line technique. In the full population, functional outcome was similar for patients treated with stent retriever versus aspiration only (adjusted common odds ratio [acOR]' 1.07 [95% CI, 0.69-1.66]). We observed a significant interaction between IVT and first-line EVT technique ( P =0.03). In the aspiration-only group, patients treated with EVT alone had worse functional outcome compared to those treated with IVT and EVT (acOR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.21-0.90]). In the stent retriever group, functional outcome did not differ between patients treated with or without IVT (acOR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.74-1.57]). There was no statistically significant interaction for successful reperfusion., Conclusions: In MR CLEAN-NO IV, the treatment effect of IVT was modified by first-line EVT technique. Patients treated with aspiration only as first-line technique had worse clinical outcomes if they did not receive IVT. No such difference was observed in patients treated with stent retrievers. Confirmation by pooling with results from other trials is needed to confirm these findings.

Purpose: We aimed to study the association of non-contrast CT (NCCT) thrombus density with procedural and clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent endovascular treatment (EVT). Since thrombus density is associated with thrombus location, we focused on M1 occlusions only., Methods: Patients with available thin-slice (< 2.5 mm) NCCT were included from a nationwide registry. Regression models were used to assess the relation between thrombus density (per Hounsfield unit [HU]) and the following outcomes. For reperfusion grade, adjusted common odds ratios (acOR) indicated a 1-step shift towards improved outcome per HU increase in thrombus density. For the binary outcomes of first-pass reperfusion (first-pass extended thrombolysis in cerebral infarction [eTICI] 2C-3, FPR), functional independence [90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2] and mortality), aORs were reported. Adjusted β coefficients (aβ) were reported for 24-h NIHSS and procedure duration in minutes. Outcome differences between first-line treatment devices (stent retriever versus aspiration) were assessed with interaction terms., Results: In 566 patients with M1 occlusions, thrombus density was not associated with reperfusion (acOR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99-1.02), FPR (aOR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99-1.03), mortality (aOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.00), 24-h NIHSS (aβ - 0.7%, 95% CI - 1.4-0.2), or procedure duration (aβ 0.27, 95% CI - 0.05-0.58). In multivariable analysis, thrombus density was associated with functional independence (aOR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.05). No interaction was found between thrombus density and first-line treatment device for any outcome., Conclusion: In patients with M1 occlusions, thrombus density was not clearly associated with procedural and clinical outcomes after EVT., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) is a serious complication after endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. We aimed to identify determinants of its occurrence and location., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from the Dutch MR CLEAN trial (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands) and MR CLEAN registry. We included adult patients with a large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation who underwent endovascular treatment within 6.5 hours of stroke onset. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify determinants of overall sICH occurrence, sICH within infarcted brain tissue, and sICH outside infarcted brain tissue., Results: SICH occurred in 203 (6%) of 3313 included patients and was located within infarcted brain tissue in 50 (25%), outside infarcted brain tissue in 23 (11%), and both within and outside infarcted brain tissue in 116 (57%) patients. In 14 patients (7%), data on location were missing. Prior antiplatelet use, baseline systolic blood pressure, baseline plasma glucose levels, post-endovascular treatment modified treatment in cerebral ischemia score, and duration of procedure were associated with all outcome parameters. In addition, determinants of sICH within infarcted brain tissue included history of myocardial infarction (adjusted odds ratio, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.06-2.56]) and poor collateral score (adjusted odds ratio, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.02-1.95]), whereas determinants of sICH outside infarcted brain tissue included level of occlusion on computed tomography angiography (internal carotid artery or internal carotid artery terminus compared with M1: adjusted odds ratio, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.16-2.78])., Conclusions: Several factors, some potentially modifiable, are associated with sICH occurrence. Further studies should investigate whether modification of baseline systolic blood pressure or plasma glucose level could reduce the risk of sICH. In addition, determinants differ per location of sICH, supporting the hypothesis of varying underlying mechanisms., Registration: URL: https://www.isrctn.com/; Unique identifier: ISRCTN10888758.

Background: In patients with large vessel occlusion stroke of the anterior circulation, underlying cause is a determinant of outcome. Whether this is the case for posterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke has yet to be determined. We aimed to report on cause in patients with posterior circulation stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy and to analyze the association with functional outcome., Methods: We used data of patients with posterior circulation stroke included in the MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands) registry, a prospective multicenter observational study, between 2014 and 2018. Stroke cause was categorized into large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), cardioembolism, arterial dissection, embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), other determined cause, or undetermined cause. For primary analysis on the association between cause and outcome, we used multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis to estimate the adjusted common odds ratio for a shift towards a better functional outcome on the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days with LAA as a reference group. Secondary outcomes included favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-3), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at 24 to 48 hours, reperfusion on digital subtraction angiography, and stroke progression., Results: Of 264 patients with posterior circulation stroke, 84 (32%) had LAA, 48 (18%) cardioembolism, 31 (12%) dissection, and 14 (5%) ESUS. Patients with a dissection were younger (48 [interquartile range, 43-60] years) and had a lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at baseline (12 [interquartile range, 6-31]) than patients with other cause. Functional outcome was better for patients with cardioembolism and ESUS compared to LAA (modified Rankin Scale adjusted common odds ratio, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.1-5.2], respectively adjusted common odds ratio, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.0-9.3]). Patients with a dissection had a lower chance of successful reperfusion compared with LAA (adjusted odds ratio, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.06-0.70])., Conclusions: Unlike the anterior circulation, most frequent cause in our posterior large vessel occlusion stroke cohort is LAA followed by cardioembolism, dissection, and ESUS. Patients with cardioembolism and ESUS have a better prognosis for functional outcome after endovascular thrombectomy than patients with LAA.

Background: Approximately one-third of patients with ischemic stroke treated with endovascular treatment do not recover to functional independence despite rapid and successful recanalization. We aimed to quantify the importance of predictors of poor functional outcome despite successful reperfusion., Methods: We analyzed patients from the MR CLEAN Registry between March 2014 and November 2017 with successful reperfusion (extended Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction ≥2B). First, predictors were selected based on expert opinion and were clustered according to acquisition over time (ie, baseline patient factors, imaging factors, treatment factors, and postprocedural factors). Second, several models were constructed to predict 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS)). The relative importance of individual predictors in the most extensive model was expressed by the proportion of unique added χ 2 to the model of that individual predictor., Results: Of 3180 patients, 1913 (60%) had successful reperfusion. Of these 1913 patients, 1046 (55%) were functionally dependent at 90 days (mRS >2). The most important predictors for mRS were baseline patient factors (ie, pre-stroke mRS, added χ 2 0.16; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at baseline, added χ 2 0.12; age, added χ 2 0.10), and postprocedural factors (ie, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), added χ 2 0.12; pneumonia, added χ 2 0.09). The probability of functional independence for a typical stroke patient with sICH was 54% (95% CI 36% to 72%) lower compared with no sICH, and 21% (95% CI 4% to 38%) for pneumonia compared with no pneumonia., Conclusion: Baseline patient factors and postprocedural adverse events are important predictors of poor functional outcome in successfully reperfused patients with ischemic stroke. This implies that prevention of postprocedural adverse events has the greatest potential to further improve outcomes in these patients., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DWJD reports funding from the Dutch Heart Foundation, Brain Foundation Netherlands, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Health Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health, and unrestricted grants from Penumbra, Stryker European Operations BV, Medtronic, Thrombolytic Science, and Cerenovus for research, all paid to the institution. AvdL reports funding from the Dutch Heart Foundation, Dutch Brain Foundation, Stryker, Angiocare BV, Medtronic/Covidien/EV3, MEDAC GmbH/LAMEPRO, Penumbra, and Top Medical Concentric, all paid to the institution. CBLMM reports funding from CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, Stryker, Health Evaluation Netherlands, all paid to the institution, and is a shareholder of Nico.lab, a company that focuses on the use of artificial intelligence for medical imaging analysis. YBWR reports funding from CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, Stryker, Health Evaluation Netherlands, all paid to the institution, and is a shareholder of Nico.lab, a company that focuses on the use of artificial intelligence for medical imaging analysis., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: We evaluated data from all patients in the Netherlands who underwent endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in the past 3.5 years, to identify nationwide trends in time to treatment and procedural success, and assess their effect on clinical outcomes., Methods: We included patients with proximal occlusions of the anterior circulation from the second and first cohorts of the MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Clinical trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands) Registry (March 2014 to June 2016; June 2016 to November 2017, respectively). We compared workflow times and rates of successful reperfusion (defined as an extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2B-3) between cohorts and chronological quartiles (all included patients stratified in chronological quartiles of intervention dates to create equally sized groups over the study period). Multivariable ordinal logistic regression was used to assess differences in the primary outcome (ordinal modified Rankin Scale at 90 days)., Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts (second cohort n=1692, first cohort n=1488) except for higher age, poorer collaterals, and less signs of early ischemia on computed tomography in the second cohort. Time from stroke onset to groin puncture and reperfusion were shorter in the second cohort (median 185 versus 210 minutes; P <0.001 and 236 versus 270 minutes; P <0.001, respectively). Successful reperfusion was achieved more often in the second than in the first cohort (72% versus 66%; P <0.001). Functional outcome significantly improved (adjusted common odds ratio 1.23 [95% CI, 1.07-1.40]). This effect was attenuated by adjustment for time from onset to reperfusion (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.98-1.28]) and successful reperfusion (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.99-1.30]). Outcomes were consistent in the analysis per chronological quartile., Conclusions: Clinical outcomes after endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in routine clinical practice have improved over the past years, likely resulting from improved workflow times and higher successful reperfusion rates.

Background: First pass reperfusion (FPR), that is, excellent reperfusion (expanded treatment in cerebral ischemia (eTICI) 2C-3) in one pass, after endovascular treatment (EVT) of an occluded artery in the anterior circulation, is associated with favorable clinical outcome, even when compared with multiple pass excellent reperfusion (MPR). In patients with posterior circulation ischemic stroke (PCS), the same association is expected, but currently unknown. We aimed to assess characteristics associated with FPR and the influence of FPR versus MPR on outcomes in patients with PCS., Methods: We used data from the MR CLEAN Registry, a prospective observational study. The effect of FPR on 24-hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, as percentage reduction, and on modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 3 months, was tested with linear and ordinal logistic regression models., Results: Of 224 patients with PCS, 45 patients had FPR, 47 had MPR, and 90 had no excellent reperfusion (eTICI <2C). We did not find an association between any of the patient, imaging, or treatment characteristics and FPR. FPR was associated with better NIHSS (-45% (95% CI: -65% to -12%)) and better mRS scores (adjusted common odds ratio (acOR): 2.16 (95% CI: 1.23 to 3.79)) compared with no FPR. Outcomes after FPR were also more favorable compared with MPR, but the effect was smaller and not statistically significant (NIHSS: -14% (95% CI: -51% to 49%), mRS acOR: 1.50 (95% CI: 0.75 to 3.00))., Conclusions: FPR in patients with PCS is associated with favorable clinical outcome in comparison with no FPR. In comparison with MPR, the effect of FPR was no longer statistically significant. Nevertheless, our data support the notion that FPR should be the treatment target to pursue in every patient treated with EVT., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DWJD reports funding from the Dutch Heart Foundation, Brain Foundation Netherlands, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Health Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health, and unrestricted grants from Penumbra Inc., Stryker European Operations BV, Medtronic, Thrombolytic Science, LLC, and Cerenovus for research, all paid to his institution. CBLMM reports grants from CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, European Commission, TWIN Foundation, Dutch Health Evaluation Program, and Stryker, paid to his institution and is a minority shareholder of NICO.LAB. WHvZ received consultation fees from Stryker and Cerenovus, paid to his institution. PJvD received consultation fees from Stryker, paid to his institution., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Purpose: Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke has been proven clinically effective, but evidence of the cost-effectiveness based on real-world data is scarce. The aim of this study was to assess whether endovascular therapy plus usual care is cost-effective in comparison to usual care alone in acute ischemic stroke patients., Methods: An economic evaluation was performed from a societal perspective with a 2-year time horizon. Empirical data on health outcomes and the use of resources following endovascular treatment were gathered parallel to the MR CLEAN trial (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands) and its 2-year follow-up study. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated as the extra costs per additional patient with functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) and the extra cost per quality-adjusted life year gained., Results: The mean costs per patient in the intervention group were $126 494 versus $143 331 in the control group (mean difference, -$16 839 [95% CI, -$38 113 to $5456]). Compared with patients in the control group, more patients in the intervention group achieved functional independence, 37.2% versus 23.9% (absolute difference, 13.3% [95% CI, 4.0%-22.0%]) and they generated more quality-adjusted life years, 0.99 versus 0.83 (mean difference of 0.16 [95% CI, 0.04-0.29]). Endovascular treatment dominated standard treatment with $18 233 saved per extra patient with a good outcome and $105 869 saved per additional quality-adjusted life year., Conclusions: Endovascular treatment added to usual care is clinically effective, and cost saving in comparison to usual care alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Registration: URL: https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/695; Unique identifier: NL695. URL: https://www.isrctn.com; Unique identifier: ISRCTN10888758.

Background and Purpose: The benefit of endovascular treatment (EVT) for posterior circulation stroke (PCS) remains uncertain, and little is known on treatment outcomes in clinical practice. This study evaluates outcomes of a large PCS cohort treated with EVT in clinical practice. Simultaneous to this observational study, several intervention centers participated in the BASICS trial (Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study), which tested the efficacy of EVT for basilar artery occlusion in a randomized setting. We additionally compared characteristics and outcomes of patients treated outside BASICS in trial centers to those from nontrial centers., Methods: We included patients with PCS from the Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands Registry: a prospective, multicenter, observational study of patients who underwent EVT in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2018. Primary outcome was a score of 0 to 3 on the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included reperfusion status and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. For outcome comparison between patients treated in trial versus nontrial centers, we used ordinal logistic regression analysis., Results: We included 264 patients of whom 135 (51%) had received intravenous thrombolysis. The basilar artery was most often involved (77%). Favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-3) was observed in 115/252 (46%) patients, and 109/252 (43%) patients died. Successful reperfusion was achieved in 178/238 (75%), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 9/264 (3%). The 154 nontrial patients receiving EVT in BASICS trial centers had similar characteristics and outcomes as the 110 patients treated in nontrial centers (modified Rankin Scale adjusted cOR: 0.77 [95% CI, 0.5-1.2])., Conclusions: Our study shows that high rates of favorable clinical outcome and successful reperfusion can be achieved with EVT for PCS, despite high mortality. Characteristics and outcomes of patients treated in trial versus nontrial centers were similar indicating that our cohort is representative of clinical practice in the Netherlands. Randomized studies using modern treatment approaches are needed for further insight in the benefit of EVT for PCS.

Background and Purpose: Whereas a clear benefit of endovascular treatment for anterior circulation stroke has been established, randomized trials assessing the posterior circulation have failed to show efficacy. Previous studies in anterior circulation stroke suggest that advanced thrombectomy devices were of great importance in achieving clinical benefit. Little is known about the effect of thrombectomy techniques on outcomes in posterior circulation stroke. In this study, we compare first-line strategy of direct aspiration to stent retriever thrombectomy for posterior circulation stroke., Methods: We analyzed data of patients with a posterior circulation stroke who were included in the Multicentre Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands Registry between March 2014 and December 2018, a prospective, nationwide study, in which data were collected from consecutive patients who underwent endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke in the Netherlands. We compared patients who underwent first-line aspiration versus stent retriever thrombectomy. Primary outcome was functional outcome according to the modified Rankin Scale. Secondary outcomes were reperfusion grade, complication rate, and procedure duration. Associations between thrombectomy technique and outcome measures were estimated with multivariable ordinal logistic regression analyses., Results: Overall, 71 of 205 patients (35%) were treated with aspiration, and 134 (65%) with stent retriever thrombectomy. Patients in the aspiration group had a lower pc-ASPECTS on baseline computed tomography, and general anesthesia was more often applied in this group. First-line aspiration was associated with better functional outcome compared with stent retriever thrombectomy (adjusted common odds ratio for a 1-point improvement on the modified Rankin Scale 1.94 [95% CI, 1.03-3.65]). Successful reperfusion (extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction ≥2B) was achieved more often with aspiration (87% versus 73%, P =0.03). Symptomatic hemorrhage rates were comparable (3% versus 4%). Procedure times were shorter in the aspiration group (49 versus 69 minutes P <0.001)., Conclusions: In this retrospective nonrandomized cohort study, our findings suggest that first-line aspiration is associated with a shorter procedure time, better reperfusion, and better clinical outcome than stent retriever thrombectomy in patients with ischemic stroke based on large vessel occlusion in the posterior circulation.

Introduction: We investigated the impact of the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the resulting lockdown on reperfusion treatments and door-to-treatment times during the first surge in Dutch comprehensive stroke centers. Furthermore, we studied the association between COVID-19-status and treatment times., Methods: We included all patients receiving reperfusion treatment in 17 Dutch stroke centers from May 11th, 2017, until May 11th, 2020. We collected baseline characteristics, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission, onset-to-door time (ODT), door-to-needle time (DNT), door-to-groin time (DGT) and COVID-19-status at admission. Parameters during the lockdown (March 15th, 2020 until May 11th, 2020) were compared with those in the same period in 2019, and between groups stratified by COVID-19-status. We used nationwide data and extrapolated our findings to the increasing trend of EVT numbers since May 2017., Results: A decline of 14% was seen in reperfusion treatments during lockdown, with a decline in both IVT and EVT delivery. DGT increased by 12 min (50 to 62 min, p-value of < 0.001). Furthermore, median NIHSS-scores were higher in COVID-19 - suspected or positive patients (7 to 11, p-value of 0.004), door-to-treatment times did not differ significantly when stratified for COVID-19-status., Conclusions: During the first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic, a decline in acute reperfusion treatments and a delay in DGT was seen, which indicates a target for attention. It also appeared that COVID-19-positive or -suspected patients had more severe neurologic symptoms, whereas their EVT-workflow was not affected., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background and Purpose: Acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion is uncommon in young adults. We assessed stroke cause in young patients and compared their outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy with older patients., Methods: We used data (March 2014 until November 2017) of patients with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke from the MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands) Registry, a nationwide, prospective study on endovascular thrombectomy in the Netherlands. We compared young patients (18-49 years) with older patients (≥50 years). Outcomes included modified Rankin Scale score after 90 days (both shift and dichotomized analyses), expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Analyses were adjusted for confounding., Results: We included 3256 patients, 310 (10%) were 18 to 49 years old. Young patients had lower median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores (14 versus 16, P <0.001) and less cardiovascular comorbidities than older patients. Stroke etiologies in young patients included carotid dissection (16%), cardio-embolism (15%), large artery atherosclerosis (10%), and embolic stroke of undetermined source (31%). Clinical outcome was better in young than older patients (acOR for modified Rankin Scale shift: 1.8 [95% CI, 1.5-2.2]; functional independence [modified Rankin Scale score 0-2] 61 versus 39% [adjusted odds ratio, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.6-2.8]); mortality 7% versus 32%, adjusted odds ratio, 0.2 [95% CI, 0.1-0.3]). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred less frequently in young patients (3% versus 6%, adjusted odds ratio, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.2-1.00]). Successful reperfusion (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Score 2b-3) did not differ between groups. Onset to reperfusion time was shorter in young patients (253 versus 255 minutes, adjusted B in minutes 12.4 [95% CI, 2.4-22.5])., Conclusions: Ten percent of patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy were younger than 50. Cardioembolism and carotid dissection were common underlying causes in young patients. In one-third of cases, no cause was identified, indicating the need for more research on stroke cause in young patients. Young patients had better prognosis and lower risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage than older patients.

Background: Randomised controlled trials with perfusion selection have shown benefit of endovascular treatment (EVT) for ischaemic stroke between 6 and 24 hours after symptom onset or time last seen well. However, outcomes after EVT in these late window patients without perfusion imaging are largely unknown. We assessed their characteristics and outcomes in routine clinical practice., Methods: The Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands Registry, a prospective, multicentre study in the Netherlands, included patients with an anterior circulation occlusion who underwent EVT between 2014 and 2017. CT perfusion was no standard imaging modality. We used adjusted ordinal logistic regression analysis to compare patients treated within versus beyond 6.5 hours after propensity score matching on age, prestroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (ASPECTS), collateral status, location of occlusion and treatment with intravenous thrombolysis. Outcomes included 3-month mRS score, functional independence (defined as mRS 0-2), and death., Results: Of 3264 patients who underwent EVT, 106 (3.2%) were treated beyond 6.5 hours (median 8.5, IQR 6.9-10.6), of whom 93 (87.7%) had unknown time of stroke onset. CT perfusion was not performed in 87/106 (80.2%) late window patients. Late window patients were younger (mean 67 vs 70 years, p<0.04) and had slightly lower ASPECTS (median 8 vs 9, p<0.01), but better collateral status (collateral score 2-3: 68.3% vs 57.7%, p=0.03). No differences were observed in proportions of functional independence (43.3% vs 40.5%, p=0.57) or death (24.0% vs 28.9%, p=0.28). After matching, outcomes remained similar (adjusted common OR for 1 point improvement in mRS 1.04, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.93)., Conclusions: Without the use of CT perfusion selection criteria, EVT in the 6.5-24-hour time window was not associated with poorer outcome in selected patients with favourable clinical and CT/CT angiography characteristics. randomised controlled trials with lenient inclusion criteria are needed to identify more patients who can benefit from EVT in the late window., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Erasmus MC received funds from Stryker and Bracco Imaging by DWJD. MUMC received funds from Stryker and Codman for consultations by WHvZ. WHvZ and RJvO are principal investigators for the MR CLEAN-LATE trial. R-JBG and FAVP are coordinating researchers for MR CLEAN-LATE. CBLMM received funds from TWIN Foundation (related to this project, paid to institution) and from CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, Stryker, European Commission, Health Evaluation Netherlands (unrelated; all paid to institution). YBWEMR, CBLMM and IGHJ are shareholders of Nico.lab, a company that focuses on the use of artificial intelligence for medical imaging analysis. RL reports institutional fees from Ischamaview for consultancy. The other authors had no conflicting interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

The Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score is an important metric for reperfusion therapy assessment in acute ischemic stroke. It is commonly used as a technical outcome measure after endovascular treatment (EVT). Existing TICI scores are defined in coarse ordinal grades based on visual inspection, leading to inter- and intra-observer variation. In this work, we present autoTICI, an automatic and quantitative TICI scoring method. First, each digital subtraction angiography (DSA) acquisition is separated into four phases (non-contrast, arterial, parenchymal and venous phase) using a multi-path convolutional neural network (CNN), which exploits spatio-temporal features. The network also incorporates sequence level label dependencies in the form of a state-transition matrix. Next, a minimum intensity map (MINIP) is computed using the motion corrected arterial and parenchymal frames. On the MINIP image, vessel, perfusion and background pixels are segmented. Finally, we quantify the autoTICI score as the ratio of reperfused pixels after EVT. On a routinely acquired multi-center dataset, the proposed autoTICI shows good correlation with the extended TICI (eTICI) reference with an average area under the curve (AUC) score of 0.81. The AUC score is 0.90 with respect to the dichotomized eTICI. In terms of clinical outcome prediction, we demonstrate that autoTICI is overall comparable to eTICI.

Background and Purpose: Benefit of early endovascular treatment (EVT) for ischemic stroke varies considerably among patients. The MR PREDICTS decision tool, derived from MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands), predicts outcome and treatment benefit based on baseline characteristics. Our aim was to externally validate and update MR PREDICTS with data from international trials and daily clinical practice., Methods: We used individual patient data from 6 randomized controlled trials within the HERMES (Highly Effective Reperfusion Evaluated in Multiple Endovascular Stroke Trials) collaboration to validate the original model. Then, we updated the model and performed a second validation with data from the observational MR CLEAN Registry. Primary outcome was functional independence (defined as modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) 3 months after stroke. Treatment benefit was defined as the difference between the probability of functional independence with and without EVT. Discriminative performance was evaluated using a concordance (C) statistic., Results: We included 1242 patients from HERMES (633 assigned to EVT, 609 assigned to control) and 3156 patients from the MR CLEAN Registry (all of whom underwent EVT within 6.5 hours). The C-statistic for functional independence was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.72–0.77) in HERMES and, after model updating, 0.80 (0.78–0.82) in the Registry. Median predicted treatment benefit of routinely treated patients (Registry) was 10.3% (interquartile range, 5.8%–14.4%). Patients with low (<1%) predicted treatment benefit (n=135/3156 [4.3%]) had low rates of functional independence, irrespective of reperfusion status, suggesting potential absence of treatment benefit. The updated model was made available online for clinicians and researchers at www.mrpredicts.com., Conclusions: Because of the substantial treatment effect and small potential harm of EVT, most patients arriving within 6 hours at an endovascular-capable center should be treated regardless of their clinical characteristics. MR PREDICTS can be used to support clinical judgement when there is uncertainty about the treatment indication, when resources are limited, or before a patient is to be transferred to an endovascular-capable center.

Background: The effectiveness of endovascular therapy in patients with stroke caused by basilar-artery occlusion has not been well studied., Methods: We randomly assigned patients within 6 hours after the estimated time of onset of a stroke due to basilar-artery occlusion, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive endovascular therapy or standard medical care. The primary outcome was a favorable functional outcome, defined as a score of 0 to 3 on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 to 6, with 0 indicating no disability, 3 indicating moderate disability, and 6 indicating death) at 90 days. The primary safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 3 days after the initiation of treatment and mortality at 90 days., Results: A total of 300 patients were enrolled (154 in the endovascular therapy group and 146 in the medical care group). Intravenous thrombolysis was used in 78.6% of the patients in the endovascular group and in 79.5% of those in the medical group. Endovascular treatment was initiated at a median of 4.4 hours after stroke onset. A favorable functional outcome occurred in 68 of 154 patients (44.2%) in the endovascular group and 55 of 146 patients (37.7%) in the medical care group (risk ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.50). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 4.5% of the patients after endovascular therapy and in 0.7% of those after medical therapy (risk ratio, 6.9; 95% CI, 0.9 to 53.0); mortality at 90 days was 38.3% and 43.2%, respectively (risk ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.12)., Conclusions: Among patients with stroke from basilar-artery occlusion, endovascular therapy and medical therapy did not differ significantly with respect to a favorable functional outcome, but, as reflected by the wide confidence interval for the primary outcome, the results of this trial may not exclude a substantial benefit of endovascular therapy. Larger trials are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy for basilar-artery occlusion. (Funded by the Dutch Heart Foundation and others; BASICS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01717755; Netherlands Trial Register number, NL2500.)., (Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Purpose: Acute stroke patients presenting with a distal internal carotid artery occlusion and patent carotid terminus, allowing for collateral flow via the circle of Willis, may have a more favorable natural history. Therefore, benefit of endovascular treatment (EVT) is less evident. We performed an exploratory analysis of EVT results compared to conservative treatment in patients with 'carotid-I' occlusions., Methods: We report on EVT-treated and non-EVT-treated patients with carotid-I occlusions from the MR CLEAN Registry, MR CLEAN trial, and our comprehensive stroke center. CT-angiography was reviewed on primary collateral patency and choroid plexus enhancement. Perfusion deficits were assessed on CT-perfusion (CTP). Clot migration was assessed by comparing clot location on baseline CTA to its location on periprocedural digital subtraction angiography. Outcomes included 90-day functional independence (mRS 0-2), successful reperfusion and mortality., Results: We included 51 patients. Forty-one patients received EVT, ten patients did not. Intravenous thrombolysis was administered in 32 (78%) EVT-treated patients and 6 (60%) non-EVT-treated patients. CTP, available for 17 patients, showed hypoperfusion on cerebral blood flow maps in 13 (76%) patients. Successful reperfusion after EVT occurred in 23 (56%), and clot migration in 8 patients (20%). Functional independence was achieved in 54% (21/39) of EVT-treated and in 10% (1/10) of non-EVT-treated patients. Mortality was 26% (10/39) and 30% (3/10), respectively. Anterior choroidal artery patency and choroid plexus enhancement were positively associated with functional independence., Conclusion: In our population, data suggest improved outcomes after EVT in carotid-I occlusion patients and provide no arguments to withhold EVT in these patients.

Background: Currently, there are no recommendations regarding the use of heparinized flush during endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke. Periprocedural heparin could, however, affect functional outcome and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). We surveyed protocols on heparin flush concentrations in Dutch EVT centers and assessed its effect on safety and efficacy outcomes., Methods: Patients registered in the MR CLEAN Registry, from 2014 up to 2017 were included. We collected data on center protocols regarding heparin flush concentrations (IU/L) and grouped patients by their per protocol administered heparin flush concentration. We used a random effects model with random intercepts by EVT center and analyzed endpoints using regression models. Endpoints were sICH, mRS at 90 days, mortality and reperfusion rates., Results: A total of 3157 patients were included of which 45% (6 centers) received no heparin in the flush fluids, 1.8% (1 center) received flush fluids containing 2000 IU/L heparin, 26% (4 centers) received 5000 IU/L, 22% (4 centers) received 10.000 IU/L and 5.6% (1 center) received 25.000 IU/L. Higher heparin concentration was associated with increased sICH (aOR 1.15; 95% CI 1.02-1.29), but not with functional outcome, mortality or reperfusion rates., Conclusion: Effect of heparin in flush fluids should not be ignored by clinicians or researchers as higher concentrations may be associated with higher rates of ICH. The observed variation in protocols regarding heparin concentrations between EVT centers should encourage further studies, ideally in a controlled way, resulting in recommendations on heparin use in flush fluids in future guidelines.

Background: Wide necked bifurcation aneurysms (WNBA) are among the most difficult aneurysms to treat. Very low dome-to-neck (DTN) and aspect ratios provide an even greater challenge in the management of WNBAs. We present the safety and efficacy profile for endovascular clip system (eCLIPs) device in the treatment of this subset of WNBAs with very unfavorable morphologies., Methods: In our case series, 24 patients treated at 12 international centers were taken from a larger prospective voluntary post-marketing registry of 65 patients treated with the eCLIPs device and coiling. Those who had WNBAs at either the carotid or basilar terminus with a DTN ratio <1.6 and aspect ratio <1.2 were included. Radiologic and clinical outcomes were assessed immediately after the procedure and at the latest follow-up., Results: The eCLIPs device was successfully deployed in 23 cases (96%). One patient (4.2%) died due to guidewire perforation distal to the implant site. No other complications were documented. After a mean follow-up of 15.8 months (range 3-40 months), good radiologic outcomes (modified Raymond-Roy classification (MRRC) scores of 1 or 2) were documented in 20 of 21 patients (95%) with follow-up data. The lone patient with an MRRC score of 3 showed coiled compaction after incomplete neck coverage with the device., Conclusion: Our series of patients with aneurysms having adverse DTN and aspect ratios demonstrated that the eCLIPs device has a safety and efficacy profile comparable with currently available devices in the treatment of WNBAs., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JDV is a consultant for Evasc; honoraria is paid to his institution. LS is a consultant for, and receives honoraria from, Evasc. TRM is a principal of eVasc Neurovascular, manufacturers of the eCLIPs., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background First-pass reperfusion (FPR) is associated with favorable outcome after endovascular treatment. It is unknown whether this effect is independent of patient characteristics and whether FPR has better outcomes compared with excellent reperfusion (Expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [eTICI] 2C-3) after multiple-passes reperfusion. We aimed to evaluate the association between FPR and outcome with adjustment for patient, imaging, and treatment characteristics to single out the contribution of FPR. Methods and Results FPR was defined as eTICI 2C-3 after 1 pass. Multivariable regression models were used to investigate characteristics associated with FPR and to investigate the effect of FPR on outcomes. We included 2686 patients of the MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands) Registry. Factors associated with FPR were as follows: history of hyperlipidemia (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.10), middle cerebral artery versus intracranial carotid artery occlusion (adjusted OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.06-1.16), and aspiration versus stent thrombectomy (adjusted OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.11). Interventionist experience increased the likelihood of FPR (adjusted OR, 1.03 per 50 patients previously treated; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06). Adjusted for patient, imaging, and treatment characteristics, FPR remained associated with a better 24-hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (-37%; 95% CI, -43% to -31%) and a better modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months (adjusted common OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.83-2.54) compared with no FPR (multiple-passes reperfusion+no excellent reperfusion), and compared with multiple-passes reperfusion alone (24-hour NIHSS score, (-23%; 95% CI, -31% to -14%), and mRS score (adjusted common OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.19-1.78)). Conclusions FPR compared with multiple-passes reperfusion is associated with favorable outcome, independently of patient, imaging, and treatment characteristics. Factors associated with FPR were the experience of the interventionist, history of hyperlipidemia, location of occluded artery, and use of an aspiration device compared with stent thrombectomy.

Background: Endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke due to proximal occlusion of the anterior intracranial circulation, started within 6 h from symptom onset, has been proven safe and effective. Recently, EVT has been proven effective beyond the 6-h time window in a highly selected population using CT perfusion or MR diffusion. Unfortunately, these imaging modalities are not available in every hospital, and strict selection criteria might exclude patients who could still benefit from EVT. The presence of collaterals on CT angiography (CTA) may offer a more pragmatic imaging criterion that predicts possible benefit from EVT beyond 6 h from time last known well. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of EVT for patients treated between 6 and 24 h from time last known well after selection based on the presence of collateral flow., Methods: The MR CLEAN-LATE trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint trial, aiming to enroll 500 patients. We will investigate the efficacy of EVT between 6 and 24 h from time last known well in acute ischemic stroke due to a proximal intracranial anterior circulation occlusion confirmed by CTA or MRA. Patients with any collateral flow (poor, moderate, or good collaterals) on CTA will be included. The inclusion of poor collateral status will be restricted to a maximum of 100 patients. In line with the current Dutch guidelines, patients who fulfill the characteristics of included patients in DAWN and DEFUSE 3 will be excluded as they are eligible for EVT as standard care. The primary endpoint is functional outcome at 90 days, assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Treatment effect will be estimated with ordinal logistic regression (shift analysis) on the mRS at 90 days. Secondary endpoints include clinical stroke severity at 24 h and 5-7 days assessed by the NIHSS, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, recanalization at 24 h, follow-up infarct size, and mortality at 90 days, DISCUSSION: This study will provide insight into whether EVT is safe and effective for patients treated between 6 and 24 h from time last known well after selection based on the presence of collateral flow on CTA., Trial Registration: NL58246.078.17 , ISRCTN19922220 , Registered on 11 December 2017.

Background: Endovascular treatment (EVT) has greatly improved the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with a proximal intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO) of the anterior circulation. Currently, there is clinical equipoise concerning the added benefit of intravenous alteplase administration (IVT) prior to EVT. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of omitting IVT before EVT in patients with AIS caused by an anterior circulation LVO., Methods: MR CLEAN-NO IV is a multicenter randomized open-label clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment (PROBE design). Patients ≥ 18 years of age with a pre-stroke mRS < 3 with an LVO confirmed on CT angiography/MR angiography eligible for both IVT and EVT are randomized to receive either IVT (0.9 mg/kg) followed by EVT, or direct EVT in a 1:1 ratio. The primary objective is to assess superiority of direct EVT. Secondarily, non-inferiority of direct EVT compared to IVT before EVT will be explored. The primary outcome is the score on the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Ordinal regression with adjustment for prognostic variables will be used to estimate treatment effect. Secondary outcomes include reperfusion graded with the eTICI scale after EVT and stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) at 24 h. Safety outcomes include intracranial hemorrhages scored according to the Heidelberg criteria. A total of 540 patients will be included., Discussion: IVT prior to EVT might facilitate early reperfusion before EVT or improved reperfusion rates during EVT. Conversely, among other potential adverse effects, the increased risk of bleeding could nullify the beneficial effects of IVT. MR CLEAN-NO IV will provide insight into whether IVT is still of added value in patients eligible for EVT., Trial Registration: www.isrctn.com : ISRCTN80619088 . Registered on 31 October 2017.

Objective: To evaluate the role of blood pressure (BP) as mediator of the effect of conscious sedation (CS) compared to local anesthesia (LA) on functional outcome after endovascular treatment (EVT)., Methods: Patients treated in the Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN) Registry centers with CS or LA as preferred anesthetic approach during EVT for ischemic stroke were analyzed. First, we evaluated the effect of CS on area under the threshold (AUT), relative difference between baseline and lowest procedural mean arterial pressure (∆LMAP), and procedural BP trend, compared to LA. Second, we assessed the association between BP and functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) with multivariable regression. Lastly, we evaluated whether BP explained the effect of CS on mRS., Results: In 440 patients with available BP data, patients treated under CS (n = 262) had larger AUTs (median 228 vs 23 mm Hg*min), larger ∆LMAP (median 16% vs 6%), and a more negative BP trend (-0.22 vs -0.08 mm Hg/min) compared to LA (n = 178). Larger ∆LMAP and AUTs were associated with worse mRS (adjusted common odds ratio [acOR] per 10% drop 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.97, and acOR per 300 mm Hg*min 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.97). Patients treated under CS had worse mRS compared to LA (acOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.87) and this association remained when adjusting for ∆LMAP and AUT (acOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42-0.92)., Conclusions: Large BP drops are associated with worse functional outcome. However, BP drops do not explain the worse outcomes in the CS group., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Purpose: Thrombectomy with stent retriever and direct aspiration are equally effective in the endovascular treatment of anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke. We report efficacy and safety of initial treatment technique per occlusion segment., Methods: For this study, we analyzed data from the MR CLEAN Registry, a prospective, observational study in all centers that perform endovascular therapy in the Netherlands. We used ordinal logistic regression analysis to compare clinical and technical results of first line direct aspiration treatment with that of stent retriever thrombectomy stratified for occlusion segment. Primary outcome measure was functional outcome at 3 months. Secondary outcome measures included reperfusion grade expressed as the extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score, periprocedural complication risk, time to reperfusion, and mortality., Results: Of the 2282 included patients, 1658 (73%) were initially treated with stent retriever and 624 (27%) with aspiration. Four hundred sixty-two patients had an occlusion of the intracranial part of the carotid artery, 1349 of the proximal middle cerebral artery, and 471 of the distal parts of the middle cerebral artery. There was no difference in functional outcome between aspiration and stent retriever thrombectomy (odds ratio, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.9-1.2]) in any of the occlusion segments ( P value for interaction=0.2). Reperfusion rate was higher in the aspiration group (odds ratio, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.1-1.6]) and did not differ between occlusion segments ( P value for interaction=0.6). Procedure times were shorter in the aspiration group (minutes 50 versus 65 minutes; P <0.0001). There was no difference in periprocedural complications or mortality., Conclusions: In unselected patients with anterior circulation infarcts, we observed equal functional outcome of aspiration and stent retriever thrombectomy in all occlusion segments. When aspiration was the first line treatment modality, reperfusion rates were higher and procedure times shorter in all occlusion segments.

Background and Purpose: Ischemic brain tissue damage in patients with acute ischemic stroke, as measured by the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) may be more impactful in older than in younger patients, although this has not been studied. We aimed to investigate a possible interaction effect between age and ASPECTS on functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment, and compared reperfusion benefit across age and ASPECTS subgroups., Methods: Patients with ischemic stroke from the MR CLEAN Registry (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands; March 2014-November 2017) were included. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression was performed to obtain effect size estimates (adjusted common odds ratio) on functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score) for continuous age and granular ASPECTS, with a 2-way multiplicative interaction term (age×ASPECTS). Outcomes in four patient subgroups based on age (< versus ≥ median age [71.8 years]) and baseline ASPECTS (6-10 versus 0-5) were assessed., Results: We included 3279 patients. There was no interaction between age and ASPECTS on modified Rankin Scale ( P =0.925). The highest proportion of modified Rankin Scale 5 to 6 was observed in patients >71.8 years with baseline ASPECTS 0 to 5 (68/107, 63.6%). There was benefit of reperfusion in all age-ASPECTS subgroups. Although the adjusted common odds ratio was lower in patients >71.8 years with ASPECTS 0 to 5 (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.60 [95% CI, 0.66-3.88], n=110), there was no significant difference from the main effect ( P =0.299)., Conclusions: Although the proportion of poor outcomes following endovascular treatment was highest in older patients with low baseline ASPECTS, outcomes did not significantly differ from the main effect. These results do not support withholding endovascular treatment based n a combination of high age and low ASPECTS.