Search

Objective: The incidence of chronic limb-threatening ischemia in diabetic patients is increasing. The factors influencing outcome after infrapopliteal revascularization in these patients are largely unknown. Therefore, this study aims to identify the impact of perioperative glucose control on the long-term outcomes in this patient cohort, and furthermore to identify other factors independently associated with outcome., Methods: Consecutive diabetic patients undergoing infrapopliteal endovascular revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia were identified. Patients' demographics, procedural details, daily capillary blood glucose, and hemoglobin A1C levels were collected and analyzed against the study end points using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis., Results: A total of 437 infrapopliteal target vessels were successfully crossed in 203 patients. Amputation-free survival by Kaplan-Meier (estimate (standard error)%) was 74 (3.3)% and 63 (3.7)%, primary patency was 61 (4.2)% and 50 (4.9)%, assisted primary patency was 69 (5.2)% and 55 (6.1)%, and secondary patency was 71 (3.8)% and 59 (4.1)% at 1 year and 2 years, respectively. Cox regression analysis showed high perioperative capillary blood glucose levels to be an independent predictor of binary restenosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-1.1.78; P = .015). Postprocedural dual-antiplatelet therapy was found to be an independent predictor of amputation-free survival (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.04-2.75; P = .033), and freedom from major adverse limb events (HR: 1.96; 95% CI, 1.16-3.27; P = .023) and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly associated with better amputation-free survival (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.87; P = .014)., Conclusions: Poor perioperative glycemic control is associated with a higher incidence of restenosis after infrapopliteal revascularization in diabetic patients. Dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with better outcomes in this group., (Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The development of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) after iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) continues to be a considerable issue for both pregnant and postpartum women with rates as high as 70% among those managed with anticoagulation alone. This study aims to characterize the outcomes of interventional treatment for acute iliofemoral DVT in this at-risk population., Methods: A retrospective analysis of all postpartum patients treated for acute iliofemoral DVT with lysis and stenting between January 2012 and December 2017 at a referral center. Patient demographics, risk factors, procedural factors. and complications were collected. Post-treatment outcomes were compared with all nonpostpartum females treated within the same time period. These included the severity of PTS evaluated using the Villalta scale, duration of vessel patency and factors affecting reintervention timing and success. Further detailed review of cases needing reintervention was also conducted through a retrospective review of documentation and an analysis of all imaging by a consultant radiologist., Results: A total of 11 postpartum women were identified. The median age was 28 years (range, 22-41 years) and intervention was performed at a median of 3 weeks after birth (range 2-12 weeks). No major or minor complications associated with intervention were reported in any patients. The median Villalta score was 3 at 6 months, improving to 2 at 12 months. Overall, two patients were classified as mild having PTS (18%), with no cases of moderate to severe PTS. On comparison with nonpostpartum (n = 68) Villalta scores, no significant difference in outcome was observed at 6 months (median score, 3; range, 0-15 months; P = .95) or at 1 year (median score, 1; range, 0-15; P = .84). Cumulative patency at 1 year was found to be 64% in postpartum women compared with 93% in nonpostpartum women. The postpartum state was found to be a significant predictor of cumulative patency loss (hazard ratio, 0.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.62; P = .01). However, no significant difference in primary and primary-assisted patency was observed. Of the postpartum patients, 55% required reintervention (6/11) compared with 29% of nonpostpartum patients (20/68). The mean time to initial reintervention was 62 days (range, 7-233 days). Reintervention was unsuccessful in all cases presenting with 100% vessel occlusion (4/11), but successful in both cases with partial occlusion (2/11). Analysis of the etiologic factors associated with reintervention revealed that all reintervention cases were associated with technical failure to fully lyse and stent beyond residual disease at the initial procedure. No technical, flow, or hematologic factors were identified in the four cases that retained primary patency., Conclusions: This study suggests that percutaneous intervention to achieve early thrombus removal and venous stenting provides a favorable alternative to conservative therapies owing to its potential to decrease the severity of PTS. Completion of lysis and adequate stenting of disease is essential to prevent reocclusion, for which reintervention carries a lower likelihood of success. Further research is warranted to further characterize the appropriate management of postpartum women with iliofemoral DVT., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective/background: The aim was to assess two year outcomes with placement of the Vici Venous Stent ® in patients with chronic iliofemoral venous occlusions (complete blockage)., Methods: This was a retrospective single centre study comprising patients treated with the Vici Venous Stent for venographically verified iliofemoral venous occlusion and post-thrombotic syndrome (Villalta score ≥ 5 points) at least 12 months after acute deep vein thrombosis. Venography and intravascular ultrasound were used peri-operatively; duplex ultrasound was used to assess stent patency during follow up., Results: Eighty-eight patients (101 limbs) had stent placement between March 2014 and October 2016. Median pre-treatment Villalta score was 14 (range 5-33). Stenting extended across the inguinal ligament in 63 limbs (62%) in order to land in a healthy venous segment. Six patients (7%) required endophlebectomy and fistula creation. Median imaging follow up was 21 months (range 0-41 months). Primary, assisted primary and secondary patency rates at one year were 59%, 78%, and 87%, respectively, and two years 51%, 73%, and 82%, respectively. Forty-three limbs (43%) had re-intervention (lysis, venoplasty, and/or placement of stent) during follow up; median time to re-intervention was 32 days (range 0-520 days). At 24 months, 37 of 53 limbs (70%) with available Villalta assessment showed clinically significant improvement (>30% reduction of baseline score). Villalta scores at the 6, 12, and 24 month clinical follow up were significantly lower than before stenting (p < .001, all time points). In a subset analyses of limbs with stenting terminating above and below the inguinal ligament, secondary cumulative patency rates at 24 months were 90% and 79%, respectively; clinical outcome showed 58% vs. 73% of limbs with clinically significant improvement, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in patency or clinical outcomes., Conclusion: The Vici Venous Stent is associated with a good secondary patency rate and durable and substantial symptomatic resolution in patients with chronic post-thrombotic occlusions, regardless of whether stents extended beneath the inguinal ligament., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Central vein thrombosis is defined as thrombosis of the major vessels draining either the upper or lower extremities. It presents most commonly in the upper limb, where it affects the subclavian veins and the superior vena cava; in the lower limb, it affects the common iliac veins and the inferior vena cava. These different anatomical segments pose unique challenges in both acute and chronic settings, and this article will summarize the current best practice treatment options., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Disclosure: Dr. Black is a consultant for Cook Medical, C. L. Bard, Inc., W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., VENITI, Inc., Phillips Healthcare, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and OptiMed.