Search

Background and Aim: The clinical importance and management of vasospasm as a complication during endovascular stroke treatment (EVT) has not been well studied. We sought to investigate current expert opinions in neurointervention and therapeutic strategies of iatrogenic vasospasm during EVT., Methods: We conducted an anonymous international online survey (4 April 2023 to 15 May 2023) addressing treatment standards of neurointerventionalists (NIs) practising EVT. Several illustrative cases of patients with vasospasm during EVT were shown. Two study groups were compared according to the NI's opinion regarding the potential influence of vasospasm on patient outcome after EVT using descriptive analysis., Results: In total, 534 NI from 56 countries responded, of whom 51.5% had performed >200 EVT. Vasospasm was considered a complication potentially influencing the patient's outcome by 52.6% (group 1) whereas 47.4% did not (group 2). Physicians in group 1 more often added vasodilators to their catheter flushes during EVT routinely (43.7% vs 33.9%, p=0.033) and more often treated severe large-vessel vasospasm with vasodilators (75.3% vs 55.9%; p<0.001), as well as extracranial vasospasm (61.4% vs 36.5%, p<0.001) and intracranial medium-vessel vasospasm (27.1% vs 11.2%, p<0.001), compared with group 2. In case of a large-vessel vasospasm and residual and amenable medium-vessel occlusion during EVT, the study groups showed different treatment strategies. Group 2 continued the EVT immediately more often, without initiating therapy to treat the vasospasm first (9.6% vs 21.1%, p<0.001)., Conclusion: There is disagreement among NIs about the clinical relevance of vasospasm during EVT and its management. There was a higher likelihood of use of preventive and active vasodilator treatment in the group that perceived vasospasm as a relevant complication as well as differing interventional strategies for continuing an EVT in the presence of a large-vessel vasospasm., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: We investigated whether patients with large infarct and the presence or absence of perfusion mismatch are associated with endovascular treatment benefit., Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of the Endovascular Therapy in Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion with a Large Infarct (ANGEL-ASPECT) randomized trial, which enrolled patients within 24 hours of onset with ASPECTS 3 to 5 or ASPECTS 0 to 2 with an infarct core 70 to 100 ml. Mismatch ratio was defined as time-to-maximum (T max ) >6 s cerebral volume/ischemic core volume, and mismatch volume was defined as T max >6 s volume minus ischemic core volume. We divided patients into mismatch ratio ≥1.2 and mismatch volume ≥10 ml, and mismatch ratio ≥1.8 and mismatch volume ≥15 ml groups. The primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score ordinal distribution. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality., Results: There were 425 patients included. In both the mismatch ratio ≥1.2 and mismatch volume ≥10 ml (mismatch+, n = 395; mismatch-, n = 31) and mismatch ratio ≥1.8 and mismatch volume ≥15 ml groups (mismatch+, n = 346; mismatch-, n = 80), better 90-day modified Rankin Scale outcomes were found in the endovascular treatment group compared with the MM group (4 [2-5] vs 4 [3-5], common odds ratio [cOR], 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-2.7, p = 0.001; 4 [2-5] vs 4 [3-5], cOR, 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8, p = 0.001, respectively), but not in patients without mismatch ratio ≥1.2 and mismatch volume ≥10 ml (5 [3-6] vs 5 [4-6], cOR, 1.2, 95% CI 0.3-4.1, p = 0.83), and mismatch ratio ≥1.8 and mismatch volume ≥15 ml (4 [3-6] vs 5 [3-6], cOR, 1.2, 95% CI 0.6-2.7, p = 0.60). However, no interaction effect was found in both subgroups (p interaction >0.10)., Conclusion: Endovascular treatment was more efficacious than MM in patients with mismatch profiles, but no treatment effect or interaction was noted in the no mismatch profile patients. However, the small sample size of patients with no mismatch may have underpowered our analysis. A pooled analysis of large core trials stratified by mismatch is warranted. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:729-738., (© 2024 American Neurological Association.)

Purpose: To identify and compare the predictors of failure of early neurological improvement (fENI)after successful EVT for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ACLVO) and posterior circulation LVO (PCLVO)., Methods: Subjects were selected from the ANGEL-ACT registry. fENI was defined as unchanged or worsened in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSS) between admission and 24 h after EVT. Predictors of fENI after successful EVT (mTICI 2b-3) were determined via center-adjusted analyses. Univariable and multivariable comparisons between ACLVO and PCLVO were performed., Results: A total of 1447 patients, 1128 were with ACLVO, and 319 were with PCLVO. Among the patients with ACLVO, there were 409 patients (36.3%) with fENI and 719 patients (63.7%) with ENI. We observed that pre-stroke mRS scale score of 2 (odd ratio[OR] 95% confidence interval[CI], 6.93[1.99-24.10], P = 0.002), initial NIHSS score (OR per point[95%CI], 0.97[0.95-0.99], P = 0.012), diabetes (OR[95%CI], 1.56[1.08-2.25], P = 0.017), previous ICH (OR[95%CI] 9.21[1.76-48.15], P = 0.008), local anesthesia (OR[95%CI] 1.63[1.10-2.42], P = 0.014), onset-to-puncture time (OR[95%CI], 1.001[1.000-1.001], P = 0.009), symptomatic ICH (OR[95%CI] 3.90[2.27-6.69], P < 0.001), and continued use of tirofiban within 2 h after EVT (OR[95%CI], 0.69[0.51-0.93], P = 0.014) were independent predictors of fENI of ACLVO after EVT. Among the patients with PCLVO, there were 112 patients (35.1%) with fENI and 207 patients (64.9%) with ENI. In contrast, admission SBP (OR[95%CI], 0.98[0.97-0.99], P = 0.012), and vascular dissection within 2 h after EVT (OR[95%CI], 7.23[1.33-39.13], P = 0.022) were independent predictors of fENI of PCLVO after EVT., Conclusion: In selected patients, successful EVT can lead to similar outcomes in PCLVO and ACLVO. Some predictors of fENI in both anterior circulation and posterior circulation were identified in our study, which should be highly considered in the clinical practice in LVO patients undergoing EVT., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background and Purpose: Two early basilar artery occlusion (BAO) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) did not establish the superiority of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) over medical management. Yet many providers continued to recommend EVT. The goal of the present article is to compare physicians' diagnostic and management strategies of BAO among middle-income and high-income countries (MICs and HICs, respectively)., Methods: We conducted an international survey from January to March 2022 regarding management strategies in acute BAO, to examine clinical and imaging parameters influencing clinician management of patients with BAO. We compared responses between physicians from HIC and MIC., Results: Among the 1245 respondents from 73 countries, 799 (64.2%) were from HIC, with the remaining 393 (31.6%) from MIC. Most respondents perceived that EVT was superior to medical management for acute BAO, but more so in respondents from HIC (98.0% vs. 94.2%, p < 0.01). MIC respondents were more likely to believe further RCTs were warranted (91.6% vs. 74.0%, p < 0.01) and were more likely to find it acceptable to enroll any patient who met a trial's criteria in the standard medical treatment arm (58.8% vs. 38.5%, p < 0.01)., Conclusions: In an area where clinical equipoise was called into question despite the lack of RCT evidence, we found that respondents from MIC were more likely to express willingness to enroll patients with BAO in an RCT than their HIC counterparts., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr Alemseged reported research grants from Medical Research Future Fund, Australian Heart Foundation, Sylvia & Charles Viertel Charitable Foundation. Dr Fischer reported research grants from Medtronic; consultant for Medtronic, Stryker, CSL Behring; advisory board for Alexion/Portola. Dr Kaesmacher reported grants from the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences/Bangerter Foundation, Swiss Stroke Society, Clinical Trials Unit Bern, and the Swiss National Science Foundation. Dr Nagel reported consultancy for Brainomix, speaker bureaus with Boehringer Ingelheim and Pfizer. Dr Nguyen reported research support from Medtronic and SVIN. Dr Puetz reported fees as lecturer for Daiichi Sankyo. Dr Sacco reported research grants from Novartis and Uriach; fees for advisor or speaker from Abbott, Allergan-Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Teva. Dr Siegler reported consulting from Ceribell and speakers’ bureau with AstraZeneca. Dr Thomalla reported fees as a consultant from Acandis, Alexion, Amarin, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Portola, and Stryker. Dr Yamagami reported research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, lecturer’s fees from Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Stryker, Bristol-Myers Squib; advisory boards for Daiichi-Sankyo. Dr Banerjee reported consultancy for RapidAI. Dr Marto reports consulting fees from Amicus Therapeutics and Boehringer Ingelheim; speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Kaiser reported grants from the Joachim Herz Foundation and the Else Kröner Fresenius Center for Digital Health.

Background: Early endovascular intervention team mobilization may reduce reperfusion times and improve clinical outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with a possible intervenable vessel occlusion (IVO). In an emergency department or mobile stroke unit, incorporating rapidly available non-contrast CT (NCCT) information with examination findings may improve the accuracy of arterial occlusion prediction scales. For this purpose, we developed a rapid and straightforward IVO predictive instrument-the T 3 AM 2 PA 1 scale., Methods: The T 3 AM 2 PA 1 scale was retrospectively derived from our 'Get with the Guidelines' database. We included all patients with acute stroke alert between January 2017 and August 2018 with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score between 5 and 25 inclusive. Different pre-intervention variables were collected, including itemized NIHSS and NCCT information. The T 3 AM 2 PA 1 scale was also compared with other commonly used scales and was validated in a separate sequential retrospective cohort of patients with a full range of NIHSS scores., Results: 574 eligible patients from 2115 acute stroke alerts were identified. The scale was established with five items (CT hyperdense sign, parenchymal hypodensity, lateralizing hemiparesis, gaze deviation, and language disturbance), with a total score of 9. To minimize unnecessary angiography, a cut-off of ≥5 for IVO detection yielded a sensitivity of 52%, a specificity of 90%, and a positive predictive value of 76%., Conclusions: The T 3 AM 2 PA 1 scale accurately predicts the presence of clinical IVO in patients with AIS. Adopting the T 3 AM 2 PA 1 scale could reduce revascularization times, improve treatment outcomes, and potentially reduce disability., Competing Interests: Competing interests: WSB has received grants from Athersys, BMS, Florida High Tech Corridor, NIH, Reneuron, and VuEssence. His consulting activities include Genentech, VuEssence, with stock options in VuEssence. He has patents planned or pending with USF. His equity positions include holdings in Inur Technologies and Electron Transport Biotech. He also has a financial interest in PRIME Education. MM has received grants from the NIH and has consulted with Balt, Cerenovus, Medtronic, and Rapid Pulse. His testimony work includes Foley Mansfield and Huff Powell Bailey as clients. He has participated as an advisor for Cerenovus and Rapid Pulse. His financial holdings include Bendit Technologies, Borvo Medical, BrainQ, Endostream, Serenity Medical, Synchron, Sim & Cure, QAS AI, Quantanosis AI. ZR has received royalties for his publication on aneurysms and has lectured for Beijing Tiantan Hospital, the Chinese Stroke Association, and the Chinese Institute for Brain Research., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Blood pressure (BP) management at the initial stage of stroke caused by large-vessel occlusion (LVO) remains challenging. We assessed the association between baseline BP and clinical and safety outcomes of endovascular treatment (EVT) in different stroke etiologies., Methods: Patients with acute ischemic stroke and anterior circulation LVO were screened from a prospective, multicenter registry of EVT from November 2017 to March 2019. The primary outcome was poor 90-day outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 3-6). The safety outcome was 24 h post-procedure parenchymal hematoma (PH). The Trial of Org 101072 in Acute Stroke Treatment criteria were used for etiologic stroke classification. Restricted cubic spline and binary logistic regression analysis were performed to examine the association between study outcomes and natural log-transformed BP., Results: In subgroup analyses, a U-shaped correlation existed between baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) and poor outcome in large-artery atherosclerosis stroke only. Higher MAP was an independent risk factor compared with a central reference value (≥ 133 mm Hg vs 96-115 mm Hg; adjusted OR [aOR], 2.50; 95 % CI, 1.09 to 5.71, P = 0.030). Whereas elevated MAP was associated with PH (aOR, 1.58; 95 % CI 1.04 to 2.39, P = 0.030 for a ln10-unit increase in natural log-transformed MAP) in the range <110 mm Hg exclusively for cardioembolic stroke., Conclusion: Whether it is cause or epiphenomenon, baseline BP was associated with 90-day outcome in large-artery atherosclerosis stroke, whereas in cardioembolic stroke baseline BP was correlated with post-procedure PH within a certain range. Identifying these features based on etiological subtypes may offer a reference for BP management in acute LVO stroke., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None declared., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Residual inflammatory risk (RIR) can predict the unfavourable outcomes in patients with minor ischaemic stroke. However, the impact of preprocedural RIR on long-term outcomes in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS) who underwent stenting remains understudied., Methods: This retrospective, single-centre cohort study evaluated consecutive patients with severe sICAS who underwent intracranial stenting. Patients were categorised into four groups based on preprocedural high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C): residual cholesterol inflammatory risk (RCIR, hs-CRP ≥3 mg/L and LDL-C ≥2.6 mmol/L), RIR (hs-CRP ≥3 mg/L and LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L), residual cholesterol risk (RCR, hs-CRP <3 mg/L and LDL-C ≥2.6 mmol/L) and no residual risk (NRR, hs-CRP <3 mg/L and LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L). The long-term clinical outcomes included recurrent ischaemic stroke and death. The long-term imaging outcomes consisted of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and symptomatic ISR (sISR) after stenting., Results: In this study, 952 patients were included, with 751 (78.9%) being male. Forty-six cases were categorised into the RCIR group, 211 into the RIR group, 107 into the RCR group and 588 into the NRR group. Patients with RCIR (adjusted HR 6.163; 95% CI 2.603 to 14.589; p<0.001) and RIR (adjusted HR 2.205; 95% CI 1.294 to 3.757; p=0.004) had higher risks of recurrent ischaemic stroke than those with NRR during the 54 months of median follow-up time. Patients with RCIR (adjusted HR 3.604; 95% CI 1.431 to 9.072; p=0.007) were more likely to occur ISR, and patients in the RIR group showed a significant increase in the risk of sISR (adjusted HR 2.402; 95% CI 1.078 to 5.351; p=0.032) compared with those in the NRR group with a median follow-up time of 11.9 months., Conclusions: In patients with sICAS, preprocedural RIR may predict long-term recurrent ischaemic stroke, ISR and sISR following intracranial stenting., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Frequent incidence of futile recanalization decreases the benefit of endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke. We hypothesized that the inflammation and immune response after ischemic are associated with futile recanalization. We aimed to investigate the correlation of admission systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) with futile recanalization post EVT., Methods: Patients with successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia angiographic score 2b-3) and maintained artery recanalized after 24 h of EVT were chosen from a prospective nationwide registry study. Futile recanalization was defined as a poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 3-6) at 90 days, irrespective of a successful recanalization. At admission, SII was calculated as (platelet count × neutrophil count)/lymphocyte count/100. Logistic regression analysis helped to test the relationship of SII with futile recanalization., Results: Among the 1,002 patients included, futile recanalization occurred in 508 (50.70%). No matter whether tested as quartiles or continuous variables, SII was significantly associated with futile recanalization (P < 0.05), and for every one standard deviation increase of SII, the risk of futile recanalization elevated by 22.3% (odds ratio 1.223, 95% confidence interval 1.053-1.444, P = 0.0093). Moreover, no significant interactions could be observed between SII or SII quartiles and age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, onset-to-recanalization time, and modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia angiographic scores (all P for interaction > 0.05)., Conclusions: Early SII elevation was associated with an increased risk of futile recanalization among patients with EVT. Our results indicated that therapeutic drug targeting hyperreactive immune-inflammation response might be helpful for reducing the incidence of futile recanalization., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.)

Objectives: To identify the occurrence rate and predictors of futile recanalisation after endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO)., Methods: Participants of the Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Workflow Improvement of Acute Ischaemic Stroke (ANGEL-ACT) registry were selected for the analysis. Futile recanalisation was defined as patients did not achieve a 90-day good outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤3) despite successful recanalisation (modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischaemia Scale ≥2b) after the procedure. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to find independent predictors of futile recanalisation in VBAO patients undergoing EVT., Results: Three hundred and fifteen patients with VBAO who achieved successful recanalisation after EVT were included in current analysis, of whom, 155 (49.2%) suffered futile recanalisation, and 160 achieved effective recanalisation. After the multivariable analysis, we found admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥19 (OR 4.81, 95% CI 2.76 to 8.39, p<0.001), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ≥162.2 (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.27, p=0.001), onset-to-puncture time (OTP) ≥334 min (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.68, p=0.005) and use of general anesthesia (GA) (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.22, p=0.024) were associated with futile recanalisation., Conclusions: Futile recanalisation after EVT occurred 49.2% of VBAO patients in the ANGEL-ACT registry. NIHSS≥19, PLR≥162.2, OTP≥334 min and use of GA were independent predictors of futile recanalisation., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: To investigate whether single or dual antiplatelet therapy (SAPT or DAPT) within 24 hours before endovascular treatment (EVT) could improve the clinical outcomes of patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO)., Methods: Patients from the ANGEL-ACT registry were divided into antiplatelet therapy (APT) and non-APT groups. The APT group was divided into SAPT and DAPT groups. Outcome measurement included 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) distribution, change in the NIHSS at 7 days or discharge, number of passes, modified first pass effect (mFPE), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), and mortality within 90 days. To compare the outcomes, we performed multivariable analyses by adjusting for the propensity score calculated by the logistic regression model., Results: Of 1611 patients, 1349 were in the non-APT group, while 262 (16.3 %) were in the APT group (122 [46.6 %] received SAPT, 140 [53.4 %] received DAPT). APT, SAPT or DAPT were not associated with a shift to better outcomes (non-APT vs. APT, 3[0-5] vs. 3[0-5], common odds ratio [OR], 1.04, 95 %confidence interval [CI]:0.82-1.34, P = 0.734). DAPT was associated with mFPE (OR,2.05, 95 %CI:1.39-3.01, P<0.001), more NIHSS reduction at 7 days or discharge (β, -2.13, 95 %CI: -4.02--0.24, P = 0.028), lower number of passes (β, -0.40, 95 %CI: -0.68--0.12, P=0.006), and shorter procedure duration (β, -12.4, 95 %CI: -23.74--1.05, P = 0.032) without increasing odds of successful recanalization, PH within 24 hours and mortality with 90 days ., Conclusions: APT before MT for AIS due to LVO does not affect clinical outcome in 90 days despite a tendency to reduce MT procedure time and number of passes. APT before MT in LVO does not increase SICH or mortality rates., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr. Nguyen reports research support from Medtronic and the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (unrelated). Other authors have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The outcomes of patients with large ischemic core who fail to recanalize with endovascular therapy (EVT) compared to medical management (MM) are uncertain. The objective was to evaluate the clinical and safety outcomes of patients who underwent EVT in patients with large ischemic core and unsuccessful recanalization., Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT randomized trial. Unsuccessful recanalization was defined as patients who underwent EVT with eTICI 0-2a. The primary endpoint was 90-day very poor outcome (mRS 5-6). Multivariable logistic regression was conducted controlling for ASPECTS, occlusion location, intravenous thrombolysis, and time to treatment., Results: Of 455 patients 225 were treated with MM. Of 230 treated with EVT, 43 (19%) patients had unsuccessful recanalization. There was no difference in 90-day very poor outcomes (39.5% vs. 40%, aOR 0.93, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.47-1.85, p = 0.95), sICH (7.0% vs. 2.7%, aOR 2.81, 95% CI 0.6-13.29, p = 0.19), or mortality (30% vs. 20%, aOR 1.65, 95% CI 0.89-3.06, p = 0.11) between the unsuccessful EVT and MM groups, respectively. There were higher rates of ICH (55.8% vs. 17.3%, p < 0.001), infarct core volume growth (142.7 ml vs. 90.5 ml, β = 47.77, 95% CI 20.97-74.57 ml, p < 0.001), and decompressive craniectomy (18.6% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001) in the unsuccessful EVT versus MM groups., Conclusion: In a randomized trial of patients with large ischemic core undergoing EVT with unsuccessful recanalization, there was no difference in very poor outcomes, sICH or death versus medically managed patients. In the unsuccessful EVT group, there were higher rates of any ICH, volume of infarct core growth, and decompressive craniectomy., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Background: Endovascular therapy administered within 24 hours has been shown to improve outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke with large infarction, but the data on its cost-effectiveness are limited., Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarction in China, the largest low- and middle-income country., Methods: A short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model were used to analyze the cost-effectiveness of endovascular therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke with large infarction. Outcomes, transition probability, and cost data were obtained from a recent clinical trial and published literature. The benefit of endovascular therapy was assessed by the cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained in the short and long term. Deterministic one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results., Results: Compared with medical management alone, endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarction was found to be cost-effective from the fourth year onward and during a lifetime. In the long term, endovascular therapy yielded a lifetime gain of 1.33 QALYs at an additional cost of ¥73 900 (US$ 11 400), resulting in an incremental cost of ¥55 500 (US$ 8530) per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that endovascular therapy was cost-effective in 99.5% of the simulation runs at a willingness-to-pay threshold of ¥243 000 (3 × gross domestic product per capita of China in 2021) per QALY gained., Conclusions: Endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarction could be cost-effective in China., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Understanding sex disparities in stroke can identify gaps in clinical care. The objective of this study was to investigate whether sex differences could influence clinical outcomes of patients with acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO) who underwent endovascular therapy (EVT)., Methods: Patients were selected from the ANGEL-ACT Registry. The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-3). Secondary outcomes included 90-day mRS distribution, excellent outcome (mRS 0-1), functional independence (mRS 0-2), early neurological improvement, recanalization, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality within 90 days. The above outcomes were compared by two adjustment models, including (1) multivariable logistics analysis adjusting for all baseline and procedural variables with a P < 0.05; (2) adjusting for the propensity score., Results: There were 347 acute VBAO patients treated with EVT included, of whom 72 (20.7%) were women and 275 (79.3%) were men. Women were older (72[63-76] vs. 62[53-69], P < 0.001) and had a higher rate of atrial fibrillation (31.9% vs. 8.7%, P < 0.001), lower rates of underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease (30.6% vs. 51.3%, P = 0.007), and tandem occlusion (8.3% vs. 21.8%, P = 0.009) than men. The rate of favorable outcome (mRS 0-3) was similar between women and men (41.7% vs. 51.3%, adjusted odds ratio 1.56, 95%CI: 0.83-2.95, P = 0.171). There were no sex differences in other clinical outcomes (all P > 0.05)., Conclusions: In the ANGEL-ACT registry, the percentage of men with acute VBAO undergoing EVT was approximately fourfold higher than that of women with acute VBAO undergoing EVT. Sex differences did not modify the outcomes of acute VBAO after EVT., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

The RECO is a novel endovascular treatment (EVT) device that adjusts the distance between two mesh segments to axially hold the thrombus. We organized this postmarket study to assess the safety and performance of RECO in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). This was a single-arm prospective multicentre study that enrolled patients as first-line patients treated with RECO at 9 stroke centres. The primary outcome measures included functional independence at 90 days (mRS 0-2), symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH), time from puncture to recanalization and time from symptom onset to recanalization. The secondary outcome measures were a modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score of 2b or 3 after the first attempt and at the end of the procedure and the all-cause mortality rate within 90 days. From May 22, 2020, to July 30, 2022, a total of 268 consecutive patients were enrolled in the registry. The median puncture-to-recanalization time was 64 (IQR, 45-92), and the symptom onset-to-recanalization time was 328 min (IQR, 228-469). RECO achieved successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3) after the first pass in 133 of 268 patients (49.6%). At the end of the operation, 96.6% of the patients reached mTICI 2b-3, and 97.4% of the patients ultimately achieved successful reperfusion. Sixteen (7.2%) patients had sICH. A total of 132 (49.3%) patients achieved functional independence at 90 days, and the all-cause mortality rate within 90 days was 17.5%. In this clinical experience, the RECO device achieved a high rate of complete recanalization with a good safety profile and favourable 90-day clinical outcomes.Clinical trial registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ ; Unique identifier: NCT04840719., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Importance: Endovascular therapy (EVT) demonstrated better outcomes compared with medical management in recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of patients with large infarct., Objective: To compare outcomes of EVT vs medical management across different strata of the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) and infarct core volume in patients with large infarct., Design, Setting, and Participants: This prespecified secondary analysis of subgroups of the Endovascular Therapy in Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusive Patients With a Large Infarct Core (ANGEL-ASPECT) RCT included patients from 46 stroke centers across China between October 2, 2020, and May 18, 2022. Participants were enrolled within 24 hours of symptom onset and had ASPECTS of 3 to 5 or 0 to 2 and infarct core volume of 70 to 100 mL. Patients were divided into 3 groups: ASPECTS of 3 to 5 with infarct core volume less than 70 mL, ASPECTS of 3 to 5 with infarct core volume of 70 mL or greater, and ASPECTS of 0 to 2., Interventions: Endovascular therapy or medical management., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the ordinal 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score., Results: There were 455 patients in the trial; median age was 68 years (IQR, 60-73 years), and 279 (61.3%) were male. The treatment effect did not vary significantly across the 3 baseline imaging subgroups (P = .95 for interaction). The generalized odds ratio for the shift in the 90-day mRS distribution toward better outcomes with EVT vs medical management was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.06-1.85; P = .01) in patients with ASPECTS of 3 to 5 and infarct core volume less than 70 mL, 1.22 (95% CI, 0.81-1.83; P = .23) in patients with ASPECTS of 3 to 5 and infarct core volume of 70 mL or greater, and 1.59 (95% CI, 0.89-2.86; P = .09) in patients with ASPECTS of 0 to 2., Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, no significant interaction was found between baseline imaging status and the benefit of EVT compared with medical management in patients with large infarct core volume. However, estimates within subgroups were underpowered. A pooled analysis of large core trials stratified by ASPECTS and infarct core volume strata is warranted., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04551664.

Background: Some patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) still cannot achieve functional independence despite successful reperfusion after endovascular treatment (EVT), named futile reperfusion. We aimed to explore the incidence and predictors of futile reperfusion of EVT for anterior circulation LVO in the Chinese population based on a nationwide prospective multicenter registry., Methods: We selected patients from the ANGEL-ACT (Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Workflow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke) registry. Successful reperfusion was defined as modified Treatment In Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) 2b-3 after EVT, and functional independence was defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2. A multivariable regression model was performed to identify the independent predictors of futile reperfusion in anterior circulation LVO patients., Results: A total of 1158 anterior circulation LVO patients were included in our study. 600 of the 1158 patients (51.8%) suffered futile reperfusion. Age ≥69 (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.69, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.35, P=0.002), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥14 (aOR 2.36, 95% CI 1.71 to 3.27, P<0.001), baseline serum glucose ≥6.5 mmol/L (aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.36, P=0.001), drip and ship (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.18, P=0.011), and general anesthesia (aOR 2.28, 95% CI 1.66 to 3.14, P<0.001) were associated with a high risk of futile reperfusion in the anterior LVO patients after EVT, whereas baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) ≥8 (aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.91, P=0.011) and complete reperfusion (aOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.89, P=0.010) were associated with a low risk of futile reperfusion in the anterior LVO patients after EVT., Conclusions: In the ANGEL-ACT registry, 51.8% of anterior circulation LVO patients suffered futile reperfusion after EVT. Age ≥69 years, baseline NIHSS ≥14, baseline serum glucose ≥6.5 mmol/L, drip and ship, general anesthesia, baseline ASPECTS <8, and incomplete reperfusion were the independent predictors of futile reperfusion., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: To investigate the performance of the Critical Area Perfusion Score (CAPS), based on computed tomography perfusion (CTP) time to maximum (Tmax) > 10s maps, to predict the outcome in acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) in patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT)., Methods: We perform a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of acute BAO treated with EVT in a comprehensive stroke center. The favorable outcome was defined as the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 3. We performed the logistic regression analysis to find the independent predictors of the favorable outcome. Then, we used receiver operating characteristic analyses to assess the predictive value of the imaging parameters, including CAPS, Posterior Circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (PC-ASPECTS), pons midbrain index (PMI), posterior circulation computed tomography angiography (PC-CTA) score, Basilar Artery on Computed Tomography Angiography (BATMAN) score, and CTP parameters. Finally, the Delong test was used to compare the area under the curve (AUC) of CAPS against the other imaging parameters., Results: Of the 65 enrolled patients, the incidence of the favorable outcome was 44.6% (29/65). Low CAPS (per 1- point increased odds ratio [OR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.86; P = 0.017) and admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (per 1- point increased OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.91; P = 0.001) were independently associated with favorable outcome. The AUC of CAPS was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.93; P < 0.001) with ≤ 3 cut-off value, 89.66% sensitivity, 77.22% specificity, and 80.00% accuracy, which was greater than the other imaging parameters (All P for Delong test < 0.05)., Conclusions: CAPS was the most accurate imaging-based outcome predictor in acute BAO patients. Future large prospective multicenter studies are needed to verify these results.

Background: The proper imaging modality for use in the selection of patients for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) presenting in the late window remains controversial, despite current guidelines advocating the use of advanced imaging in this population. We sought to understand if clinicians with different specialty training differ in their approach to patient selection for EVT in the late time window., Methods: We conducted an international survey of stroke and neurointerventional clinicians between January and May 2022 with questions focusing on imaging and treatment decisions of large vessel occlusion (LVO) patients presenting in the late window. Interventional neurologists, interventional neuroradiologists, and endovascular neurosurgeons were defined as interventionists whereas all other specialties were defined as non-interventionists. The non-interventionist group was defined by all other specialties of the respondents: stroke neurologist, neuroradiologist, emergency medicine physician, trainee (fellows and residents) and others., Results: Of 3000 invited to participate, 1506 (1027 non-interventionists, 478 interventionists, 1 declined to specify) physicians completed the study. Interventionist respondents were more likely to proceed directly to EVT (39.5% vs. 19.5%; p < 0.0001) compared to non-interventionist respondents in patients with favorable ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score). Despite no difference in access to advanced imaging, interventionists were more likely to prefer CT/CTA alone (34.8% vs. 21.0%) and less likely to prefer CT/CTA/CTP (39.1% vs. 52.4%) for patient selection (p < 0.0001). When faced with uncertainty, non-interventionists were more likely to follow clinical guidelines (45.1% vs. 30.2%) while interventionists were more likely to follow their assessment of evidence (38.7% vs. 27.0%) (p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Interventionists were less likely to use advanced imaging techniques in selecting LVO patients presenting in the late window and more likely to base their decisions on their assessment of evidence rather than published guidelines. These results reflect gaps between interventionists and non-interventionists reliance on clinical guidelines, the limits of available evidence, and clinician belief in the utility of advanced imaging., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Background and Purpose: Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is a common etiology of acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO) in Asia, which complicated endovascular treatment (EVT). We aimed to investigate the incidence, impacts, and predictors of ICAD in VBAO., Methods: Subjects were selected from the Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Work Flow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke registry and divided into two groups based on whether underlying ICAD existed. Underlying ICAD was determined when the following situations arise in the occlusion site during EVT: (1) fixed stenosis degree >70% or (2) stenosis >50% with distal blood flow impairment or evidence of repeated reocclusion. Multivariable regression models were used to investigate the effect of underlying ICAD on outcomes measured by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days and to identify baseline characteristics associated with underlying ICAD., Results: Among the 315 patients enrolled, 171 (54.3%) had underlying ICAD. Favorable functional outcomes (mRS 0-3) occurred in 79 of 163 patients (48.5%) with ICAD and 69 of 137 patients (50.4%) without ICAD ( p  = 0.743). Outcomes were similar between the two groups and remained similar after adjusting for the confounders. History of hypertension and elevated admission neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio were strong predictors of underlying ICAD, whereas history of atrial fibrillation and distal basilar artery occlusion were negative predictors., Conclusions: In our study, underlying ICAD was recognized in approximately half of the VBAO patients, leading to comparable outcomes after more complex EVT strategies. Some baseline characteristics were identified to be predictors for underlying ICAD, which were helpful to guide the EVT strategies before the procedure.

Purpose: We conducted this study to investigate the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapies (APT) for acute ischemic patients received endovascular treatment (EVT)., Methods: The population of our study was derived from a nationwide multicentered registry conducted by 111 centers in China. Patients were divided to groups of no APT, single APT (SAPT) or dual APT (DAPT) according to the APT received at 24 h after EVT. The primary outcome was 90-day functional independence, and the safety outcomes included the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), any type of intracranial hemorrhage, and all-caused death within 90 days. Patient characteristics, procedural data, and outcomes were analyzed., Results: A total of 1679 patients were included in this study, 71.42% of whom received oral APT at 24 h after EVT, and the initial time was 20.53(13.94-27.17) hours after recanalization or the end of procedure. 90-day functional independence was significantly more observed in patients with DAPT (54.02% vs. 33.64%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.940, 95% CI 1.444-2.606), but not in SAPT (40.75% vs. 33.64%; adjusted OR 1.280, 95% CI 0.907-1.804) compared with patients without APT. APT increased the risk of sICH (1.14% vs. 0, p = 0.036). Both the application of DAPT (adjusted OR 0.264, 95% CI 0.178-0.392, p < 0.001) and SAPT (adjusted OR 0.341, 95% CI 0.213-0.545, p < 0.001) could reduce the 90-day mortality., Conclusions: In this uncontrolled series of patients APT at 24 h after EVT showed improvement of the patients' functional independence and reduction of mortality, even though the rate of sICH was increased, especially in the DAPT-group., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors declare that they have no competing interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is one of the most common causes of acute ischemic stroke worldwide. Patients with acute large vessel occlusion due to underlying ICAD (ICAD-LVO) often do not achieve successful recanalization when undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) alone, requiring rescue treatment, including intra-arterial thrombolysis, balloon angioplasty, and stenting. Therefore, early detection of ICAD-LVO before the procedure is important to enable physicians to select the optimal treatment strategy for ICAD-LVO to improve clinical outcomes. Early diagnosis of ICAD-LVO is challenging in the absence of consensus diagnostic criteria on noninvasive imaging and early digital subtraction angiography. In this review, we summarize the clinical and diagnostic criteria, prediction of ICAD-LVO prior to the procedure, and EVT strategy of ICAD-LVO and provide recommendations according to the current literature., Competing Interests: T.N.N. discloses research support from Medtronic and the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (unrelated)., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

The last decade's progress in demonstrating the clinical benefit of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke has transformed the paradigm of care for these patients. This review presents the milestones in implementing EVT as standard of care, demonstrates the current state of evidence, provides guidance for identifying the candidate patient for EVT, and highlights unsolved and controversial issues. Ongoing trials investigate broadening of EVT indications for patients who present with large core infarction, adjunctive intra-arterial thrombolysis, medium vessel occlusion, low NIHSS, and tandem occlusion., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Two early basilar artery occlusion (BAO) randomized controlled trials did not establish the superiority of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) over medical management. While many providers continue to recommend EVT for acute BAO, perceptions of equipoise in randomizing patients with BAO to EVT versus medical management may differ between clinician specialties., Methods: We conducted an international survey (January 18, 2022 to March 31, 2022) regarding management strategies in acute BAO prior to the announcement of two trials indicating the superiority of EVT, and compared responses between interventionalists (INTs) and non-interventionalists (nINTs). Selection practices for routine EVT and perceptions of equipoise regarding randomizing to medical management based on neuroimaging and clinical features were compared between the two groups using descriptive statistics., Results: Among the 1245 respondents (nINTs = 702), INTs more commonly believed that EVT was superior to medical management in acute BAO (98.5% vs. 95.1%, p < .01). A similar proportion of INTs and nINTs responded that they would not randomize a patient with BAO to EVT (29.4% vs. 26.7%), or that they would only under specific clinical circumstances (p = .45). Among respondents who would recommend EVT for BAO, there was no difference in the maximum prestroke disability, minimum stroke severity, or infarct burden on computed tomography between the two groups (p > .05), although nINTs more commonly preferred perfusion imaging (24.2% vs. 19.7%, p = .04). Among respondents who indicated they would randomize to medical management, INTs were more likely to randomize when the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was ≥10 (15.9% vs. 6.9%, p < .01)., Conclusions: Following the publication of two neutral clinical trials in BAO EVT, most stroke providers believed EVT to be superior to medical management in carefully selected patients, with most indicating they would not randomize a BAO patient to medical treatment. There were small differences in preference for advanced neuroimaging for patient selection, although these preferences were unsupported by clinical trial data at the time of the survey., (© 2023 American Society of Neuroimaging.)

Background There are limited data on new ischemic brain lesions after endovascular treatment for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). Purpose To investigate the (a) characteristics of new ischemic brain lesions at diffusion-weighted MRI (new diffusion abnormalities) after endovascular treatment, (b) characteristics between those treated with balloon angioplasty and stent placement procedures, and (c) predictors of new ischemic brain lesions. Materials and Methods Patients with symptomatic ICAS in whom maximum medical therapy failed were prospectively enrolled between April 2020 and July 2021 from a national stroke center and underwent endovascular treatment. All study participants underwent thin-section diffusion-weighted MRI (voxel size, 1.4 × 1.4 × 2 mm 3 with no section gap) before and after treatment. The characteristics of new ischemic brain lesions were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine potential predictors of new ischemic brain lesions. Results A total of 119 study participants (mean age, 59 years ± 11 [SD]; 81 men; 70 treated with balloon angioplasty and 49 with stent placement) were enrolled. Of the 119 participants, 77 (65%) had new ischemic brain lesions. Five of the 119 participants (4%) had symptomatic ischemic stroke. New ischemic brain lesions were located in (61%, 72 of 119) and/or beyond (35%, 41 of 119) the territory of the treated artery. Of the 77 participants with new ischemic brain lesions, 58 (75%) had lesions located in peripheral brain areas. There was no evidence of a difference in the frequency of new ischemic brain lesions between the balloon angioplasty and stent groups (60% vs 71%, P = .20). In adjusted models, cigarette smoking (odds ratio [OR], 3.6; 95% CI: 1.3, 9.7) and more than one operative attempt (OR, 2.9; 95% CI: 1.2, 7.0) were independent predictors of new ischemic brain lesions. Conclusion New ischemic brain lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI scans were common after endovascular treatment for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, and occurrence may be associated with cigarette smoking and the number of operative attempts. Clinical trial registration no. ChiCTR2100052925 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Russell in this issue.

Background: The role of endovascular therapy for acute stroke with a large infarction has not been extensively studied in differing populations., Methods: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized trial in China involving patients with acute large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation and an Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score of 3 to 5 (range, 0 to 10, with lower values indicating larger infarction) or an infarct-core volume of 70 to 100 ml. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio within 24 hours from the time they were last known to be well to undergo endovascular therapy and receive medical management or to receive medical management alone. The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days (scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability), and the primary objective was to determine whether a shift in the distribution of the scores on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days had occurred between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included scores of 0 to 2 and 0 to 3 on the modified Rankin scale. The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours after randomization., Results: A total of 456 patients were enrolled; 231 were assigned to the endovascular-therapy group and 225 to the medical-management group. Approximately 28% of the patients in both groups received intravenous thrombolysis. The trial was stopped early owing to the efficacy of endovascular therapy after the second interim analysis. At 90 days, a shift in the distribution of scores on the modified Rankin scale toward better outcomes was observed in favor of endovascular therapy over medical management alone (generalized odds ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 1.69; P = 0.004). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 14 of 230 patients (6.1%) in the endovascular-therapy group and in 6 of 225 patients (2.7%) in the medical-management group; any intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 113 (49.1%) and 39 (17.3%), respectively. Results for the secondary outcomes generally supported those of the primary analysis., Conclusions: In a trial conducted in China, patients with large cerebral infarctions had better outcomes with endovascular therapy administered within 24 hours than with medical management alone but had more intracranial hemorrhages. (Funded by Covidien Healthcare International Trading [Shanghai] and others; ANGEL-ASPECT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04551664.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: The benefit of stroke thrombectomy for large infarct core still lacks robust randomised controlled studies., Aim: To demonstrate the design of a clinical trial on endovascular therapy for acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) patients with large infarct core volume., Design: ANGEL-ASPECT is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded End-point trial to evaluate whether best medical management (BMM) combined with endovascular therapy improves neurological functional outcomes as compared with BMM alone in acute LVO patients with Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 3-5 on non-contrast CT or infarct core volume range of 70-100 mL (defined as rCBF <30% on CT perfusion or ADC <620 on MRI) up to 24 hours from symptom onset or last seen well., Study Outcomes: The primary efficacy outcome is 90 (±7) days modified Rankin Scale. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 48 hours from randomisation is the primary safety outcome., Discussion: The ANGEL-ASPECT trial will screen patients with large infarct core (ASPECTS 3-5 or 70-100 mL) through image evaluation criteria within 24 hours and explore the efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy compared with BMM., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: The aim of this study is to test the prognostic value of a diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) score in acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) with successful recanalization., Methods: The DWI-based pons-midbrain and thalamus (PMT) score was developed to assess posterior circulation infarcts. We test its prognostic value and compare it with other two established scales, the DWI-based posterior circulation acute stroke prognosis Early CT score (PC-ASPECTS) and brain stem score (BSS). A retrospective cohort of consecutive ABAO patients with pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging and successful recanalization (defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b-3) were analyzed. A favorable outcome was defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 2 or less. The prognostic performance of three scales was estimated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses., Results: One hundred and sixteen eligible patients (mean age, 59.1 ± 11.7 [standard deviation]; 96 [82.8%] man) were included and evaluated. Between favorable (mRS ≤ 2) and unfavorable groups, the baseline PMT score (median [interquartile range], 3 [1-4] versus 6 [5-8]; P < 0.001) differs significantly. ROC curve analyses showed the PMT score had the best prognostic value for favorable outcome (area under the curve, PMT versus BSS versus PC-ASPECTS = 0.80 versus 0.72 versus 0.68, P = 0.010). Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed baseline National Institute of Health stroke scale (OR, 0.90 [95%CI, 0.86-0.95], P = 0.004) and PMT score < 5 (OR, 17.83 [95%CI, 3.91-81.19], P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of favorable outcome., Conclusions: The PMT score seems to predict clinical outcome of ABAO patients with successful recanalization., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Endovascular treatment is a highly effective therapy for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. However, in clinical practice, nearly half of the patients do not have favorable outcomes despite successful recanalization of the occluded artery. This unfavorable outcome can be defined as having clinically ineffective reperfusion. The objective of the review is to describe clinically ineffective reperfusion after endovascular therapy and its underlying risk factors and mechanisms, including initial tissue damage, cerebral edema, the no-reflow phenomenon, reperfusion injury, procedural features, and variations in postprocedural management. Further research is needed to more accurately identify patients at a high risk of clinically ineffective reperfusion after endovascular therapy and to improve individualized periprocedural management strategies, to increase the chance of achieving favorable clinical outcomes.

Background: Most trials comparing endovascular treatment (EVT) alone versus intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase (IVT) + EVT in directly admitted patients with a stroke are non-inferiority trials. However, the margin based on the level of uncertainty regarding non-inferiority of the experimental treatment that clinicians are willing to accept to incorporate EVT alone into clinical practice remains unknown., Objective: To characterize what experienced stroke clinicians would consider an acceptable level of uncertainty for hypothetical decisions on whether to administer IVT or not before EVT in patients admitted directly to EVT-capable centers., Methods: A web-based, structured survey was distributed to a cross-section of 600 academic neurologists/neurointerventionalists. For this purpose, a response framework for a hypothetical trial comparing IVT+EVT (standard of care) with EVT alone (experimental arm) was designed. In this trial, a similar proportion of patients in each arm achieved functional independence at 90 days. Invited physicians were asked at what level of certainty they would feel comfortable skipping IVT in clinical practice, considering these hypothetical trial results., Results: There were 180 respondents (response rate: 30%) and 165 with complete answers. The median chosen acceptable uncertainty suggesting reasonable comparability between both treatments was an absolute difference in the rate of day 90 functional independence of 3% (mode 5%, IQR 1-5%), with higher chosen margins observed in interventionalists (aOR 2.20, 95% CI 1.06 to 4.67)., Conclusion: Physicians would generally feel comfortable skipping IVT before EVT at different certainty thresholds. Most physicians would treat with EVT alone if randomized trial data suggested that the number of patients achieving functional independence at 90 days was similar between the two groups, and one could be sufficiently sure that no more than 3 out of 100 patients would not achieve functional independence at 90 days due to skipping IVT., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CBLMM reports grants from CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, TWIN Foundation, European Commission, Health Evaluation Netherlands, and Stryker outside the submitted work (all paid to institution); and is shareholder of Nico-lab. YBWEMR is a shareholder of Nico-lab. UF reports grants during the conduct of the study from Medtronic, Stryker, and CSL Behring, unrelated to the submitted work, and his board membership at the Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery. JG is a global principal investigator of STAR (Solitaire FR Thrombectomy for Acute Revascularisation), Clinical Event Committee member of the PROMISE study (Prospective, Multicenter, Observational, Single-Arm European Registry on the ACE Reperfusion Catheters and the Penumbra System in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke; Penumbra), and a principal investigator and consultant for the SWIFT DIRECT study (Solitaire With the Intention for Thrombectomy Plus Intravenous tPA Versus DIRECT Solitaire Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy in Acute Anterior Circulation Stroke; Medtronic) and receives Swiss National Science Foundation grants for magnetic resonance imaging in stroke. JK reports grants from the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences/Bangerter Foundation, Swiss Stroke Society, Swiss National Science Foundation, and the Clinical Trials Unit Bern during the conduct of this study., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence and predictors of first-pass effect (FPE) and to compare the clinical outcomes among FPE, multiple-pass effect, and incomplete reperfusion (ICR) in acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion., Methods: Patients from the ANGEL-ACT (Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Workflow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke) registry were included. FPE was defined as complete reperfusion after a single pass of the thrombectomy device without rescue treatment. MPE was defined as complete reperfusion after ≥ 2 passes of the thrombectomy device. ICR was defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b independent of the number of passes. Multivariable analyses were used to determine predictors of FPE and to compare the following outcomes: functional independence, mortality within 90 days, intraprocedural complications, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) among FPE, MPE, and ICR., Results: There were 1139 patients, of whom 307 (27.0%) achieved FPE. FPE was related to occlusion location (M1 vs internal carotid artery [ICA], adjusted OR [aOR] 1.57, 95% CI 1.15-2.15, p = 0.004; M2/anterior cerebral artery vs ICA, aOR 2.06, 95% CI 1.32-3.22, p = 0.002) and negatively associated with underlying intracranial atherosclerosis disease (ICAD) (aOR 0.33, 95% CI 0.23-0.49, p < 0.001). Patients with FPE had a higher rate of functional independence (52.7% of FPE patients vs 45.6% of MPE patients and 37.1% of ICR patients, p = 0.002; MPE vs FPE, aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.95, p = 0.023; ICR vs FPE, aOR 0.45, 95% CI 0.31-0.66, p < 0.001), lower rate of intraprocedural complications (4.2% vs 18.1% and 21.2%, p < 0.001; MPE vs FPE, aOR 6.23, 95% CI 3.36-11.54, p < 0.001; ICR vs FPE, aOR 7.70, 95% CI 3.97-14.94, p < 0.001), and lower rate of ICH within 24 hours (18.3% vs 27.9% and 26.9%, p = 0.009; MPE vs FPE, aOR 1.97, 95% CI 1.35-2.86, p < 0.001; ICR vs FPE, aOR 2.03, 95% CI 1.30-3.16, p = 0.002) than those with MPE and ICR., Conclusions: FPE was achieved at a rate of 27.0% and associated with functional independence, decreased intraprocedural complications, and ICH. Non-ICA occlusion and underlying ICAD were predictors of FPE.

Objective: Acute ischemic stroke caused by basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is devastating, but the optimal treatment for patients with BAO remains controversial. In this study, the authors aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment (ET) versus standard medical treatment (SMT) in patients with BAO., Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was good functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-3 at 90 days. The secondary efficacy outcome was excellent functional outcome defined as an mRS score of 0-2 at 90 days. The safety outcomes included mortality at 90 days and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Subgroup analyses were carried out based on race (Asian or non-Asian)., Results: Four RCTs of 988 patients (556 in the ET group and 432 in the SMT group) were included in this meta-analysis. The proportion of good functional outcome in the ET group was significantly higher than that in the SMT group (45.1% vs 29.6%; number needed to treat 6.45; RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.16-2.06; p = 0.003, I2 = 60%). The subgroup analysis based on race showed a significant difference between Asian and non-Asian race in the primary outcome (p = 0.03, I2 = 78.5%). Patients in the ET group had a higher rate of excellent functional outcome at 90 days than those in the SMT group (34.9% vs 20.6%; RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.07-3.12; p = 0.03, I2 = 80%). Patients in the ET group had a lower mortality at 90 days (35.6% vs 45.4%; RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.89; p = 0.0007, I2 = 0%) but a higher rate of sICH (5.4% vs 0.5%; RR 8.29, 95% CI 2.49-27.66; p = 0.0006, I2 = 0%) than those in the SMT group., Conclusions: ET may improve the functional outcome and reduce mortality at 90 days but increase the risk of sICH compared with SMT in patients with BAO. This conclusion needs to be confirmed in non-Asian populations in future studies. Systematic review registration no.: CRD42022357718 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).

Background: Sex disparities in acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) following endovascular treatment (EVT) have been recently reported. However, there is uncertainty about the effect of sex differences on functional outcomes after EVT, particularly in an Asian population. The present study aimed to compare the clinical and safety outcomes between men and women with anterior circulation LVO treated with EVT., Methods: We analyzed data from the ANGEL-ACT (Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Work Flow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Prospective Multicenter Registry Study) Registry, which was conducted at 111 hospitals from 26 provinces in China between November 2017 and March 2019. Men and women with anterior circulation LVO treated with EVT were matched using propensity scores. After a 1:1 propensity score matching, we compared the clinical outcomes including 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale distribution (primary outcome), procedure duration, successful reperfusion, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality. Furthermore, we explored sex modification on the primary outcome in subgroup analysis., Results: Of 1321 patients, 483 (36.6%) were women and 838 (63.4%) were men. The mean age for women and men were 68 and 62 years old, respectively. Among 578 patients identified after matching, there were no sex differences (men versus women) in 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale distribution (median [interquartile range], 4 [1-5] versus 3 [1-5], P =0.464), successful reperfusion (86.5% versus 91.0%, P =0.089), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (6.5% versus 7.9%, P =0.512), and mortality within 90 days (17.7% versus 17.0%, P =0.826). However, men had a longer median procedure duration than women (86 [52-128] versus 72 [48-110] minutes, β=14.51, [95% CI, 4.19-24.84]; P =0.006). Subgroup analysis showed that in patients with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score <15, women tended to have a better outcome than men, whereas there was no gender effect in those with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥15 ( P for interaction=0.032)., Conclusions: Overall, this matched-control study from the ANGEL-ACT study showed similar clinical outcomes between men and women with anterior circulation LVO treated with EVT. However, in the subgroup of patients presenting with lower stroke severity (ie, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score <15), women tended to have a better outcome than men highlighting a potential sex disparity for further investigation., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03370939.

Background: Parenchymal hemorrhage (PH) is a troublesome complication after endovascular treatment (EVT)., Objective: To investigate the incidence, independent predictors, and clinical impact of PH after EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO)., Methods: Subjects were selected from the ANGEL-ACT Registry. PH was diagnosed according to the European Collaborative Acute Stroke Study classification. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the independent predictors of PH, as well as the association between PH and 90-day functional outcome assessed by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score., Results: Of the 1227 enrolled patients, 147 (12.0%) were diagnosed with PH within 12-36 hours after EVT. On multivariable analysis, low admission Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS)(adjusted OR (aOR)=1.13, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.26, p=0.020), serum glucose >7 mmol/L (aOR=1.82, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.84, p=0.009), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; aOR=1.05, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.09, p=0.005) were associated with a high risk of PH, while underlying intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS; aOR=0.42, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.81, p=0.009) and intracranial angioplasty/stenting (aOR=0.37, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.93, p=0.035) were associated with a low risk of PH. Furthermore, patients with PH were associated with a shift towards to worse functional outcome (mRS score 4 vs 3, adjusted common OR (acOR)=2.27, 95% CI 1.53 to 3.38, p<0.001)., Conclusions: In Chinese patients with AIS caused by anterior circulation LVO, the risk of PH was positively associated with low admission ASPECTS, serum glucose >7 mmol/L, and NLR, but negatively related to underlying ICAS and intracranial angioplasty/stenting., Trial Registration Number: NCT03370939., Competing Interests: Competing interests: ZR: consultant to Penumbra Company, USA., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: Acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO) is a catastrophic disease for patients. There is evidence that the eventual patient outcome depends on patient-specific and procedural factors. This study aimed to identify the incidence and independent predictors of the 90-day poor outcome in VBAO after endovascular treatment (EVT)., Methods: Subjects were selected from the ANGEL-ACT registry. The 90-day poor outcome was defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 4 to 6. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the independent predictors of the 90-day poor outcome., Results: Of the 347 enrolled patients with acute VBAO undergoing EVT, 176 (50.7%) experienced the 90-day poor outcome. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that only the use of general anesthesia (GA) (odds ratio [OR] = 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-3.37; P = 0.006) and heparin during the procedure (OR =1.74; 95% CI, 1.06-2.86; P = 0.028), admission National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 26 (OR=3.96; 95% CI, 2.37-6.61; P < 0.001), and time from onset to puncture (OTP) ≥ 395 min (OR=1.91; 95% CI, 1.14-3.20; P = 0.014) and procedure duration ≥ 102 min (OR = 1.70; 95% CI, 1.04-2.79; P = 0.036) were independent predictors of the 90-day poor outcome after EVT. Furthermore, admission NIHSS (OR > 36 vs. ≤ 11 = 9.01, P for trend < 0.001), OTP (OR > 441min vs. ≤ 210 min = 2.71, P for trend = 0.023), and procedure duration (OR > 145 min vs. ≤ 59 min = 2.77, P for trend = 0.031) were significantly associated with increasing risk of the 90-day poor outcome., Conclusions: Poor outcome after EVT at 90 days occurred in 50.7% of acute VBAO patients from the ANGEL-ACT registry. Our study found several predictors of the 90-day poor outcome which should be highly considered in daily practice to improve acute VBAO management. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION : http://www., Clinicaltrials: gov . Unique identifier: NCT03370939., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: A subgroup of patients with acute large vessel occlusion (ALVO) may experience delayed neurological improvement (DNI) after endovascular treatment (EVT). Our study aimed to investigate the incidence and independent predictors of DNI in patients with ALVO after EVT., Methods: We selected subjects from ANGEL-ACT Registry. The definition of DNI is patients with ALVO who did not experience early neurological improvement (ENI) despite complete recanalization after EVT. These patients achieved a 90-day favorable outcome assessed by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. We defined ENI as a ≥ 4-point decrease in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) between baseline and 24 h or NIHSS of 0 or 1 at 24 h, with complete recanalization after EVT. We performed logistic regression analyses to determine the independent predictors of DNI., Results: Among the 1056 enrolled patients, 406 (38.4%) did not experience ENI. 106 (26.1%) patients without ENI achieved DNI. On Multivariate analysis, lower admission NIHSS score (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17,95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.23, P < 0.001), underlying ICAD (OR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.07-3.85, P = 0.029) and absence of general anesthesia (OR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.24-3.64, P = 0.006) were independent predictors of DNI., Conclusion: DNI occurred in 26.1% of patients with ALVO who did not experience ENI after EVT. Our study identified several independent predictors of DNI that should be highly considered in daily clinical practice to improve ALVO management., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: The benefit of endovascular reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke is highly time-dependent but the relation of delays in workflow with outcomes and the key determinants of delays remain uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the association between faster endovascular therapy and outcomes in a Chinese population with acute ischemic stroke., Methods: Patients treated with endovascular therapy within 7 h due to anterior large vessel occlusion were enrolled in the ANGEL-ACT registry. Time intervals from hospital arrival to arterial puncture (door-to-puncture), hospital arrival to reperfusion (door-to-reperfusion) and puncture-to-reperfusion were recorded. The outcomes included modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores 0-1, 0-2, mortality at 3 months, substantial reperfusion, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH)., Results: Of 932 patients receiving endovascular therapy (mean age 65.1 years, 60.1% male), the median door-to-puncture, door-to-reperfusion, and puncture-to-perfusion times were 110min (interquartile range, IQR 72-155min), 200min (IQR, 149-260min), and 76min (IQR, 50-118min). Of the patients 87.4% achieved substantial reperfusion and 9.6% had sICH. The mRS 0-1, 0-2, and mortality at 3 months were 39.8%, 43.2%, and 16.4%. Faster door-to-reperfusion and puncture-to-reperfusion were associated with higher likelihood of mRS 0-1, mRS 0-2, and lower rate of sICH. There was a trend of improved mRS, lower mortality, and fewer ICH with shorter door-to-puncture time; however, most differences were not statistically significant., Conclusion: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke in routine clinical practice, shorter time to reperfusion was associated with better outcome after endovascular therapy. Standardized workflows and training in endovascular treatment techniques should be promoted nationally to reduce in-hospital delays., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Introduction: Uncertainty remains on the optimal management of basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Two large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in 2019 and 2021 demonstrated neutral results with respect to the use of endovascular therapy (EVT) for BAO. This study aimed to understand regional variation in physicians' perceptions towards the treatment of BAO as stratified by physician respondents from China versus outside China, prior to the publication of studies demonstrating a benefit of EVT for BAO., Methods: An international online survey was conducted of stroke neurologists and neurointerventionalists from January to March 2022. Survey questions evaluated physician opinions toward the use of EVT in BAO, as well as the clinical and imaging features underlying treatment decisions. Respondents were dichotomized as either from China or from other countries and differences between groups were analyzed., Results: There were 1245 physician respondents across 73 countries of which 295 (23.7%) were from China. Compared to respondents from the rest of the world, respondents from China were more likely to be interventionalists (71.5% vs 35.0%; p < 0.0001). Overall, more than 95% of respondents believed that EVT was superior to medical therapy under certain circumstances. Chinese respondents were more likely to believe that further RCTs were necessary than respondents from other countries (93.6% vs 76.2%; p < 0.0001). Chinese respondents were more likely to use advanced imaging in later time windows and use a premorbid mRS threshold of ≤2 for BAO selection to EVT., Conclusion: Most stroke physicians believe EVT is beneficial in selected patients with BAO. Clinical and imaging modality differences were observed in the selection criteria used for EVT. There was greater inclination to enroll all trial eligible patients in a BAO RCT by respondents from China as compared to other parts of the world., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) is a catastrophic complication of endovascular treatment (EVT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO). We aimed to investigate the incidence and predictors of SICH after EVT. Patients were selected from the ANGEL-ACT registry. We diagnosed SICH according to the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the independent predictors of SICH. Of the 1283 patients, SICH was observed in 116 patients (9.0%). On multivariable analysis, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) > 12 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-3.11, P = 0.018), admission Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) < 6 (OR = 2.98, 95%CI: 1.68-5.29, P < 0.001), general anesthesia (OR = 1.81, 95%CI: 1.20-2.71, P = 0.004), prior intravenous thrombolysis (OR = 1.58, 95%CI: 1.04-2.40, P = 0.031), number of mechanical thrombectomy passes > 2 (OR = 1.68, 95%CI: 1.10-2.57, P = 0.016), and procedure duration > 96 min (OR = 1.82, 95%CI: 1.20-2.77, P = 0.005) were associated with high risk of SICH, whereas SICH was negatively associated with underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease (OR = 0.45, 95%CI: 0.26-0.79, P = 0.021). The incidence of SICH after EVT for anterior LVO was 9.0% in ANGEL-ACT registry. Our study identified some predictors, which may assist doctors in identifying LVO patients with a high risk of SICH and making the optimal peri-procedural management strategies for such patients., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Early neurological deterioration (END) may occur in some patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT). Despite several clear causes of END, such as symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, failure of recanalization, and intraprocedure complications, a particular END, termed unexplained END (END unexplained ), exists. We aimed to investigate the incidence, independent predictors, and clinical impact of END unexplained after EVT in patients with acute LVO., Methods: Subjects were selected from the ANGEL-ACT registry. END unexplained was defined as ≥4-point increase in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score between baseline and 24 hours after EVT, without the causes listed above. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the independent predictors of END unexplained , as well as the association between END unexplained and 90-day outcomes assessed by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score., Results: Among the 1557 enrolled patients, the incidence of END unexplained was 4.3% (67/1557). Admission NIHSS ≤8 (OR=6.88, 95% CI 3.86 to 12.26, p<0.001), general anesthesia (OR=3.15, 95% CI 1.81 to 5.48, p<0.001), admission neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >5 (OR=2.82, 95% CI 1.61 to 4.94, p<0.001), and number of EVT attempts >3 (OR=2.11, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.89, p=0.018) were associated independently with a high risk of END unexplained . Furthermore, patients with END unexplained were associated with a shift toward worse 90-day outcomes (mRS 5 vs 3, common OR=5.24, 95% CI 3.22 to 8.52, p<0.001)., Conclusions: END unexplained associated with poor 90day outcomes occurred in 4.3% of patients with acute LVO undergoing EVT. Several independent predictors of END unexplained were identified in this study, which should be considered in daily practice to improve acute LVO management., Clinical Trial Registration: http://wwwclinicaltrialsgov NCT03370939., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Purpose: Endovascular treatment (EVT) has shown an overwhelming benefit for acute anterior circulation artery occlusion (ACO). Whether it can achieve the same outcomes in posterior circulation artery occlusion (PCO) has not been well explained. We aimed to evaluate the characteristics and prognosis of ACO and PCO after EVT in a nationwide registry., Method: The present analysis was based on the prospective ANGEL-ACT Registry in China between November 2017 and March 2019. Demographic data, periprocedural times, recanalisation rate, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and 90-day functional outcomes were compared between the ACO and PCO groups., Results: A total of 1793 patients were analysed including 397 (22.1%) consecutive patients with PCO and 1396 (77.9%) patients with ACO treated with EVT. A larger proportion of patients with PCO had intracranial atherosclerotic disease and received extra angioplasty during EVT. Successful recanalisation and 90-day favourable functional outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. Patients with PCO showed lower 24-hour ICH and symptomatic ICH rates. There was a trend towards higher mortality rate in the PCO group (22.09% vs 14.44%; adjusted OR 1.286 (95% CI 0.820 to 2.017), p=0.2731), especially when the onset to puncture time was over 6 hours (30.77% vs 11.13%; adjusted OR 2.673 (95% CI 1.280 to 5.583), p=0.0089, interactive p=0.0002)., Conclusions: In this large prospective multicentre registry, there was a significant difference in the characteristics and periprocedural features between patients with PCO and ACO. However, successful recanalisation and 90-day favourable functional outcomes in PCO were equivalent to those in ACO., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: The aim of our study is to compare the characteristics and clinical outcomes among the different endovascular treatment (EVT) strategies for large vessel occlusion underlying intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS-LVO) in a recent nationwide registry., Methods: Patients with isolated ICAS-LVO were enrolled in our analysis and were categorized into three groups: first-line mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with rescue angioplasty and/or stenting (MT + RS), direct angioplasty and/or stenting without thrombectomy (DA), and MT alone. Baseline and periprocedural characteristics, successful recanalization, and 90-day functional outcomes were compared., Results: Of 396 patients with isolated ICAS-LVO in our study, successful recanalization was achieved in 94.5%, 100%, and 90.9% of patients in the MT + RS, DA, and MT groups, respectively. The 90-day functional independence in the three groups was 50.8%, 59.0%, and 45.1%. The main efficacy and safety outcomes showed no significant differences among the groups. First-pass recanalization (FPR) was more observed in the MT group (43.4%), the recanalization rate per attempt in the MT group gradually decreased until the fourth attempt, and further maneuvers showed recanalization rates of ≈0% per attempt. MT + RS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.10, p < 0.0001) and DA (aOR 0.18, p = 0.0013) were associated with lower FPR rate than MT alone in the multivariable logistic regression., Conclusions: The technical feasibility and favorable outcomes of several EVT strategies for ICAS-LVO were established in our study. First-line MT with a bailout angioplasty is a reasonable option for ICAS-LVO, and DA is an effective option for the cases when ICAS-LVO is strongly suspected before EVT procedure., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The role of stroke etiology subtype in patients with acute large vessel occlusion on the occurrence of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) after endovascular treatment is poorly studied, and which factors mediate their relationship remains largely unknown. We utilized nationwide registry data to explore the association of stroke subtype (cardioembolism versus large artery atherosclerosis) with HT and to identify the possible mediators., Methods: A total of 1015 subjects were selected from the ANGEL-ACT registry (Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Work Flow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke)-a prospective consecutive cohort of acute large vessel occlusion patients undergoing endovascular treatment at 111 hospitals in China between November 2017 and March 2019-and divided into large artery atherosclerosis (n=538) and cardioembolism (n=477) according to the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment criteria. The types of HT included any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), parenchymal hematoma, and symptomatic ICH within 24 hours after endovascular treatment. The association between stroke subtype and HT was analyzed using a logistic regression model. Mediation analysis was done to assess how much of the effect of stroke subtype on HT was mediated through the identified mediators., Results: Stroke subtype (cardioembolism versus large artery atherosclerosis) was associated with increased risk of any ICH (29.8% versus 16.5%; odds ratio, 2.03 [95% CI, 1.22-3.36]), parenchymal hematoma (14.3% versus 5.4%; odds ratio, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.38-6.13]), and symptomatic ICH (9.9% versus 4.7%; odds ratio, 2.59 [95% CI, 1.09-6.16]) after adjustment for potential confounders. The more thrombectomy passes in cardioembolism patients had a significant mediation effect on the association of stroke subtype with increased risk of HT (any ICH, 15.9%; parenchymal hematoma, 13.4%; symptomatic ICH, 14.2%, respectively)., Conclusions: Stroke subtype is an independent risk factor for HT within 24 hours following endovascular treatment among acute large vessel occlusion patients. Mediation analyses propose that stroke subtype contributes to HT partly through thrombectomy pass, suggesting a possible pathomechanistic link., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03370939.

Background: There remains major uncertainty regarding the optimal therapy for symptomatic nonacute extracranial vertebral artery occlusion (EVAO). Endovascular recanalization for EVAO is technically challenging, and limited data are available. This research aimed to report a multicenter clinical experience of endovascular recanalization for symptomatic nonacute EVAO and establish a novel angiographic classification., Methods: From June 2011 to December 2019, 50 symptomatic nonacute EVAO patients treated with endovascular recanalization in three regional referral stroke centers were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were categorized into four groups based on the angiographic classification. The rates of technical success, periprocedural complications, any stroke or death within 1 month, and follow-up data were assessed., Results: The rates of technical success, periprocedural complications, and any stroke or death within 1 month were 86.0% (43/50), 12.0% (6/50), and 4.0% (2/50), respectively. The recanalization rates gradually decreased from Type A to Type D (100%, 94.7%, 80%, and 63.6%, respectively; P=0.007). The EVAO patients in the Type A group with tapered stump and short-segment occlusions showed excellent recanalization effects, with 100% technical success rates and no complications. Conversely, the lowest recanalization rate of 63.6% (7/11) and the highest periprocedural complication rate of 27.3% (3/11) were observed for the Type D group., Conclusions: Endovascular recanalization for symptomatic nonacute EVAO is technically feasible, especially Type A EVAO patients, which can provide an alternative treatment option for recurrent vertebrobasilar ischemia despite optimal medical therapy. The angiographic categorization established in this study is conducive to the selection of suitable patients prior to treatment decision., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients caused by large-vessel occlusion (LVO) with different etiologies of stroke. A total of 928 AIS patients were assigned into intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS)-LVO, cardioembolic (CE)-LVO, and artery to artery embolism (ATA)-LVO groups. The safety and efficacy endpoints were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) at 24 h after EVT, 90-day favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-2), successful recanalization (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarct (mTICI) 2b/3), and complete recanalization (mTICI 3). The logistic regression analysis was used to determine the associations between the safety and efficacy endpoints. There were 305 (32.9%), 535 (57.6%), and 88 (9.5%) patients in ICAS-LVO, CE-LVO, and ATA-LVO groups, respectively. No significant difference was found in the 90-day mRS and successful recanalization among the three groups. However, compared with the ICAS-LVO group, complete recanalization rate was higher in the CE-LVO (adjusted odds ratio, 4.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.37-8.56) and ATA-LVO groups (aOR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.16-5.10). The results of subgroup analysis showed a significant association between CE-LVO stroke etiology and complete recanalization in the age population < 65 years old (aOR, 14.33; 95% CI, 4.39-46.79, P = 0.019). Functional outcomes were similar among different etiologies of stroke. CE-LVO and ATA-LVO could be related to a higher rate of complete recanalization, and there was a trend of the increased risk of parenchymal hemorrhage in the CE-LVO group., (© 2022. The American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, Inc.)

Aim: The epidemic of COVID-19 has greatly affect the world health care system, particular measures have been taken not only to provide safety for health care providers but also to maintain the treatment quality. We evaluate the effect of COVID-19 epidemic to acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) received endovascular treatment (EVT) in our institution., Methods: AIS patients with LVO who underwent EVT in the period of January 1st to April 30th between 2015 and 2020 from our stroke center. The baseline characteristics, working flow time, safety and efficacy outcome and the hospitalization status were retrospectively reviewed, compared and analyzed., Results: There is significant decline in the number of AIS patients with LVO treated compared with the previous year (36 Vs 72 patients) during the epidemic period. The door to puncture time was significantly prolong (225 minutes versus 115 minutes) as well as the length of hospital stay with increase of the hospitalization costs ( P  < 0.05 for all). There is no significant difference on the safety and efficacy outcome, such recanalization rate, incidence of intracranial hemorrhage, functional independence and mortality during the epidemic ( P  > 0.05 for all)., Conclusions: Prolongation of the working time flow during the COVID-19 epidemic did not influence the safety and efficacy of EVT in AIS patients with LVO. However, special policy and particular measures in this circumstances is still need to evolve to improve the treatment quality.

Background: There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of non-acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO), and endovascular recanalization still poses a therapeutic challenge for these patients. We report a multicenter clinical experience of endovascular recanalization for symptomatic non-acute BAO and propose an angiographic grouping to determine which patient subgroup most benefits from this treatment., Methods: Forty-two patients with non-acute BAO with progressive or recurrent vertebrobasilar ischemic symptoms who underwent endovascular recanalization were retrospectively analyzed from January 2015 to December 2019. These patients were classified into three subtypes based on their occlusion length and distal collateral reconstruction on angiograms. The rates of technical success, periprocedural complications and outcome, any stroke or death within 1 month, and follow-up data were examined., Results: The success rate of endovascular recanalization was 76.2% (32/42). The rate of periprocedural complications was 14.3% (6/42). In the three subgroups (types I-III) the success rates of endovascular recanalization were reduced (90.0%, 71.4% and 50%, respectively, p=0.023), while the overall rates of periprocedural complications were increased (5.0%, 14.3% and 37.5%, respectively, p=0.034). Type I lesions, with short-segment occlusions and good distal BA collateral reconstruction, showed favorable responses to endovascular recanalization. The median follow-up time was 1 year (IQR 11.0-19.5 months), with any stroke or death during follow-up at a rate of 7.9%., Conclusion: Endovascular recanalization can be safe and feasible for reasonably selected patients with non-acute BAO, especially type I lesions, and offers an alternative choice for those with progressive or recurrent vertebrobasilar ischemic symptoms despite aggressive medical therapy., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Advances in endovascular treatment of acute ischaemic stroke from intracranial large vessel occlusions have continued in the past decade. Here, we performed a detailed review of all the new trials and studies that had the highest evidence, the guidelines for mechanical thrombectomy, the selection of the particular population outside the guidelines and endovascular therapeutic strategies for acute ischemic stroke from occluded intracranial arteries., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The outcome of deploying balloon-mounted stents for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) has not been fully investigated. In this study we evaluate the safety and long-term outcome of using balloon-mounted stents to treat symptomatic ICAS in comparison with the WEAVE/WOVEN study., Methods: In a multicenter registry study of stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis in China, 159 patients treated with an intracranial balloon-mounted stent approved by the China Food and Drug Administration were evaluated. The morphological features of the lesions were categorized by Mori classification. The endpoints, including periprocedural and long-term clinical and radiological outcomes, were the same as those in the WEAVE/WOVEN study., Results: In the present study the mean percent stenosis before and after stenting was 84.0% and 6.1%, respectively. The proportions of Mori A, Mori B, and Mori C lesions were 33.3%, 52.2%, and 14.5%, respectively. The 72-hour rates of stroke and mortality after the procedure were 0%. The 1-year rates of any stroke, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and death were 6.3% (10/159), 5.7% (9/159), 0.6% (1/159), and 0.6% (1/159), respectively. The 1-year rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR) was 23.4% (15/64). The rate of ISR in Mori C lesions (53.8%, 7/13) was significantly higher than that in Mori A (15.8%, 3/19) or Mori B lesions (15.6%, 5/32) (p=0.024)., Conclusions: The short-term and long-term outcomes of using a balloon-mounted stent for symptomatic ICAS with focal and non-angular lesions (Mori A and B type) and smooth arterial access were comparable to the results of the WEAVE/WOVEN trial., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The optimal treatment for medically refractory non-acute intracranial artery occlusion is uncertain, and endovascular recanalization remains a technical challenge. Here, a multicenter clinical experience of dual-roadmap guidance for endovascular recanalization of non-acute intracranial artery occlusion is reported, focusing on the technical feasibility and safety., Methods: From January 2014 to December 2019, 52 consecutive patients with medically refractory atherosclerotic non-acute intracranial artery occlusion who underwent endovascular recanalization under dual-roadmap guidance in three large regional referral stroke centers were analyzed retrospectively. Four types of dual-roadmap technical schemes were applied during endovascular recanalization. The rates of technical success, periprocedural complications, any stroke or death within 30 days, and follow-up results were evaluated., Results: The technical success rate was 92.3% (48/52). The perioperative complication rate was 7.7% (4/52), and the rate of any stroke or death within 30 days was 3.8% (2/52). Asymptomatic dissection occurred in two patients, acute in-stent thrombosis followed by postoperative mild stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) 3) in one patient, and death due to reperfusion hemorrhage after successful recanalization in one patient. The rate of stroke or death beyond 30 days was 6.5% (3/46). The median clinical follow-up period was 19 months, and the median imaging follow-up period was 12 months. The restenosis rate was 13.2% (5/38)., Conclusions: Endovascular recanalization of non-acute intracranial occlusions can be performed with a high rate of technical success and few complications with assistance of the dual-roadmap technique for navigation. Four types of dual-roadmap schemes provide technical references., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives : The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke in China is unknown. This study was aimed to verify the volume change of EVT for acute ischemic stroke affected by COVID-19 and its potential factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted via an online questionnaire survey in China. The questionnaire was mainly composed of descriptive information, volume change of EVT for acute ischemic stroke, and the protection status of medical staff. Results: A total of 103 stroke physicians in 28 provinces across China completed the survey questionnaire. A volume decline in EVT for acute stroke occurred in 93 (90.3%) hospitals after lockdown (23 January 2020). Nearly half of the hospitals (51/103, 49.5%) experienced a volume decline of EVT case more than 50% and 14 (13.6%) hospitals completely ceased offering EVT. Hospitals with decline >50% of EVT case had higher proportion of hospitals with a designated area for COVID-19 screening in the emergency room (44/51, 86.3% vs 34/52, 65.4%, p = 0.01) and medical staff in quarantine (19/51, 37.3% vs 7/52, 13.5%, p < 0.01), with lower proportion of hospitals with personal protective equipment protocol (41/51, 80.4% vs 49/52, 94.2%, p = 0.03) than hospitals with decline ≤50%. Conclusions: The volume of EVT for acute ischemic stroke severely declined after lockdown in China. Designating a specific area for COVID-19 screening, insufficient personal protection and understaffing may exacerbate the volume decline of EVT.