Search

Background: Variation in the care management of repairs for ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms between centers and physicians, such as procedural volumes, may explain differences in mortality outcomes. First, we quantified the center and physician variability associated with 30- and 90-day mortality risk after ruptured open surgical repair (rOSR) and ruptured endovascular aneurysm repair (rEVAR). Second, we explored wheter part of this variability was attributable to procedural volume at the center and physician levels., Methods: Two cohorts including rOSR and rEVAR procedures between 2013 and 2019 were analyzed from the Vascular Quality Initiative database. Thirty- and 90-day all-cause mortality rates were derived from linked Medicare claims data. The median odds ratio (MOR) (median mortality risk from low- to high-risk cluster) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (variability attributable to each cluster) for 30- and 90-day mortality risks associated with center and physician variability were derived using patient-level adjusted multilevel logistic regression models. Procedural volume was calculated at the center and physician levels and stratified by quartiles. The models were sequentially adjusted for volumes, and the difference in ICCs (without vs with accounting for volume) was calculated to describe the center and physician variability in mortality risk attributable to volumes., Results: We included 450 rOSRs (mean age, 74.5 ± 7.6 years; 23.5% female) and 752 rEVARs (76.4 ± 8.4 years; 26.1% female). After rOSRs, the 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 32.9% and 38.7%, respectively. No variability across centers and physicians was noted (30- and 90-day MORs ≈1 and ICCs ≈0%). Neither center nor physician volume was associated with 30-day (P = .477 and P = .796) or 90-day mortality (P = .098 and P = .559). After rEVAR, the 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 21.3% and 25.5%, respectively. Significant center variability (30-day MOR, 1.82 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.33-2.22]; ICC, 11% [95% CI, 2%-36%]; and 90-day MOR, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.37-2.09]; ICC, 10% [95% CI, 3%-30%]), but negligeable variability across physicians (30- and 90-day MORs ≈1 and ICCs ≈0%) were noted. Neither center nor physician volume were associated with 30-day (P = .076 and P = .336) or 90-day mortality risk (P = .066 and P = .584). The center variability attributable to procedural volumes was negligeable (difference in ICCs, 1% for 30-day mortality; 0% for 90-day mortality)., Conclusions: Variability in practice from center to center was associated with short-term mortality outcomes in rEVAR, but not for rOSR. Physician variability was not associated with short-term mortality for rOSR or rEVAR. Annualized center and physician volumes did not significantly explain these associations. Further work is needed to identify center-level factors affecting the quality of care and outcomes for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms., Competing Interests: Disclosures C.M.-H. reports unrestricted research grants from Philips, Shockwave, Abbott, and Merck; he is a consultant for Abbott, Terumo, and Cook. K.G.S. reports unrestricted research grants Philips, Shockwave, Abbott, J&J, and Merck; she is a consultant for Cook and Happify., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) have high mortality rates after revascularization. Risk stratification for short-term outcomes is challenging. We aimed to develop machine-learning models to rank predictive variables for 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality after peripheral vascular intervention (PVI)., Methods: Patients undergoing PVI for CLTI in the Medicare-linked Vascular Quality Initiative were included. Sixty-six preprocedural variables were included. Random survival forest (RSF) models were constructed for 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality in the training sample and evaluated in the testing sample. Predictive variables were ranked based on the frequency that they caused branch splitting nearest the root node by importance-weighted relative importance plots. Model performance was assessed by the Brier score, continuous ranked probability score, out-of-bag error rate, and Harrell's C-index., Results: A total of 10,114 patients were included. The crude mortality rate was 4.4% at 30 days and 10.6% at 90 days. RSF models commonly identified stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD), dementia, congestive heart failure (CHF), age, urgent procedures, and need for assisted care as the most predictive variables. For both models, eight of the top 10 variables were either medical comorbidities or functional status variables. Models showed good discrimination (C-statistic 0.72 and 0.73) and calibration (Brier score 0.03 and 0.10)., Conclusion: RSF models for 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality commonly identified CKD, dementia, CHF, need for assisted care at home, urgent procedures, and age as the most predictive variables as critical factors in CLTI. Results may help guide individualized risk-benefit treatment conversations regarding PVI., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr Mena-Hurtado reports unrestricted research grants from Philips and Shockwave, and is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Cook, Medtronic, and Optum Labs; Dr Smolderen reports unrestricted research grants from Philips, Merck, Shockwave, and Johnson & Johnson; she is a consultant for Optum Labs, Cook, Tegus, Twill Inc., and Abbott Vascular. The other authors report no competing interests.

Background: National quality reporting efforts after revascularization for peripheral artery disease (PAD) are ongoing. Validation of endpoints are necessary in national quality registries., Objectives: This study sought to examine the interrater reliability for the endpoint of major amputation at 1 year in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry and the Medicare-linked Vascular Quality Initiative registry (VQI-VISION) against electronic health record (EHR) review., Methods: Surgical or endovascular revascularization procedures between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, in the VQI registry and VQI-VISION for 2 academic health systems were queried. Major amputation data were abstracted by trained data collectors for the VQI and derived from Current Procedural Terminology codes for VQI-VISION. Cases underwent protocolized adjudication for the endpoint of major amputation by EHR review. Paired tests were used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity. Spearman's ρ and Cohen's κ were used to evaluate interrater reliability., Results: Amputation endpoints for 1,936 revascularizations were examined. Compared with major amputation data in EHR review, the sensitivity for the VQI registry was 35.9% and the specificity was 99.4% (ρ = 0.53; κ = 0.48). For VQI-VISION, sensitivity was 67.7% and specificity was 98.9% (ρ = 0.75; κ = 0.74). For any amputation in VQI data, sensitivity was 35.3% and specificity was 99.3% (ρ = 0.53; κ = 0.46), and for VQI-VISION, they were 71.6% and 97.7%, respectively (ρ = 0.75; κ = 0.74)., Conclusions: Almost two-thirds of the amputations in the VQI registry and one-third of amputations in VQI-VISION were missing at 1 year compared against adjudicated EHR review. In preparing for national reporting systems for major amputation tracking, data collection system reform is needed., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The VISION registry was supported by a Food and Drug Administration grant (U01FD006936 [to Dr Goodney]). Drs Smolderen and Mena are supported by National Institutes of Health grants 1R21AT012430-01 and 1R01HL163640-01A1. Dr Goodney is supported by a research grant from the American Heart Association (SRFN #18SFRN33900147). Dr Smolderen has received unrestricted research grants from Philips, Abbott, Merck, and Johnson & Johnson; and has served as a consultant for Optum Labs and Abbott, Happify, and Haemonetics. Dr Mena-Hurtado has served as a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Cook, Medtronic, Cardinal Health, and Optum Labs. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: There is a relative lack of comparative effectiveness research on revascularization for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). We examined the association between lower extremity bypass (LEB) vs peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for CLTI and 30-day and 5-year all-cause mortality and 30-day and 5-year amputation., Methods: Patients undergoing LEB and PVI of the below-the-knee popliteal and infrapopliteal arteries between 2014 and 2019 were queried from the Vascular Quality Initiative, and outcomes data were obtained from the Medicare claims-linked Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network database. Propensity scores were calculated on 15 variables using a logistic regression model to control for imbalances between treatment groups. A 1:1 matching method was used. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and hierarchical Cox proportional hazards regression with a random intercept for site and operator nested in site to account for clustered data compared 30-day and 5-year all-cause mortality between groups. Thirty-day and 5-year amputation were subsequently compared using competing risk analysis to account for the competing risk of death., Results: There was a total of 2075 patients in each group. The overall mean age was 71 ± 11 years, 69% were male, and 76% were white, 18% were black, and 6% were of Hispanic ethnicity. Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics in the matched cohort were balanced between groups. There was no association between all-cause mortality over 30 days and LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence, 2.3% vs 2.3% by Kaplan Meier; log-rank P-value = .906; hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-1.44; P-value = .80). All-cause mortality over 5 years was lower for LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence, 55.9% vs 60.1% by Kaplan Meier; log-rank P-value < .001; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.70-0.86; P-value < .001). Accounting for competing risk of death, amputation over 30 days was also lower in LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence function, 1.9% vs 3.0%; Fine and Gray P-value = .025; subHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.95; P-value = .025). There was no association between amputation over 5 years and LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence function, 22.6% vs 23.4%; Fine and Gray P-value = .184; subHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79-1.05; P-value = .184)., Conclusions: In the Vascular Quality Initiative-linked Medicare registry, LEB vs PVI for CLTI was associated with a lower risk of 30-day amputation and 5-year all-cause mortality. These results will serve as a foundation to validate recently published randomized controlled trial data, and to broaden the comparative effectiveness evidence base for CLTI., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)