Search

Purpose: Radiation exposure is affected by C-arm fluoroscopy device positioning during percutaneous renal puncture. Our aim was to compare the exposure of surgeon's lens, hand and chest with a fluoroscopy protocol replicated in different C-arm positions. Materials and Methods: A standardized fluoroscopy protocol was created using water-equivalent solid phantoms to replicate a surgeon and patient. 111 mGy radiation (360 s) was applied in standard fluoroscopy mode (91 kVp, 2.7 mA/mAs). Dosimeters were placed on lens, chest and hand of surgeon and patient phantom models. 7 different C-arm positions were created: 0°, mediolateral (ML) +90°, ML -90°, ML +30°, ML -15°, craniocaudal (CC) +30°, CC +15°. Measurements were evaluated separately for different positions. Results: The highest radiation exposure was measured on patient dosimeter (2.97 mSv). The highest exposure on surgeon was recorded on finger dosimeter in all C-arm positions; highest dose was recorded in ML +90° position (2.88 mSv). In finger dosimeters, lowest exposure was recorded in 0° position (0.51 mSv). The lowest exposure of all positions was measured in chest dosimeter in ML -90° position (0.24 mSv). Conclusions: In positions where X-ray generator of the C-arm was facing towards the surgeon, radiation exposure measured in all dosimeters was higher compared to positions where the generator was facing away. The hand radiation exposure in all positions was higher than chest and lens. Special care must be taken to avoid facing the X-ray generator tube and hands should be as wellprotected as chest and eyes with special protective gear. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: On February 6, 2018, the European Atomic Energy Community reduced the annual equivalent dose limit for the lens from 150 to 20 mSv/year, because of its association with cataracts at low radiation doses. Our aim was to estimate the radiation doses received by the lens during endourologic procedures that require fluoroscopy. Materials and Methods: Multicenter study including prospective data of annual eye dosimeters between 2017 and 2020. Four endourologists used an eye dosimeter in endourologic procedures that require fluoroscopy (ureteroscopy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy). Surgeons 1 and 2 wore leaded glasses; surgeon 1 also used the as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) protocol. Descriptive statistical analysis using SPSS 25.0 was conducted. Results: Surgeons 1, 2, 3, and 4 performed a median of 159, 586, 102, and 129 endourologic procedures per year, respectively, for a total of 641, 2340, 413, and 350 procedures between 2017 and 2020. The median annual dose of lens radiation exposure was 0.16, 1.18, 3.79, and 1.42 mSv per year, respectively, which corresponds to 0.001, 0.009, 0.024, and 0.012 mSv per procedure. The two surgeons who used leaded glasses registered a lower radiation dose per procedure (0.001 vs 0.027). Similarly, the urologist who used the ALARA protocol registered the lowest lens radiation dose compared with the three surgeons who did not use it (0.001 vs 0.023). Conclusions: The endourologists who participated in this study effectively comply with current guidelines on radiation exposure to the lens. Registered eye lens radiation does not seem to be related to the number of procedures but rather to the use of leaded glasses and the ALARA protocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Kidney stone disease (KSD) has a lifetime prevalence of up to 14% in the United Kingdom. Primary and secondary prevention of KSD via dietary intervention is a low-cost public health intervention and remains the best preventative strategy against urolithiasis. Material and methods This prospective study was conducted on kidney stone patients attending a stone clinic at our tertiary endourology centre. Patients were taken through a questionnaire, which was completed in the clinic by a trained specialist endourology nurse. Results A total of 259 patients completed the questionnaire. 141 (54.4%) had an active stone during the clinic visit with the remaining 118 (45.6%) with a history of stone treatment. Regarding barriers to fluid intake, 43 (16.6%) patients did not have a habit of drinking water or felt too bloated, 36 (13.9%) did not like the taste, 17 (6.6%) were not thirsty, 10 (3.9%) of patients were too busy. Of those who answered, 108 (46.8%) patients did not believe there was a link between fluid intake and stone formation. A belief of a link between fluid intake and stone formation significantly predicted fluid intake (p = 0.024) with people who did believe in this drinking less water. Conclusions There are numerous perceived barriers to adequate fluid intake, with almost half of all patients not believing that there is a link between fluid intake and stone formation. This misunderstanding may predict a lower fluid intake. More attention should therefore be focussed on patient education and primary prevention aspects to avoid kidney stone recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of lasers in endourology has grown exponentially, leading to technological advancement and to miniaturization of the procedures. We aim to provide an overview of the lasers used in endourology and the associated future perspectives. Using MEDLINE, a non-systematic review was performed including articles between 2006 and 2023. English language original articles, reviews and editorials were selected based on their clinical relevance. Guidelines recommend ureteroscopy in case of stones <2 cm and a percutaneous approach for renal stones ≥2 cm. High-power holmium (Ho:YAG) lasers and the new thulium fibre laser (TFL) may change the future, offering shorter procedures for complex stones, with good outcomes. Increased intrarenal temperature associated with these new technologies may be overcome with adaptive strategies and optimal settings. For upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), the combination of laser techniques and these new lasers may reduce the risk of stenosis and allow for a more accurate tumour ablation, potentially reducing the recurrence rates. Laser enucleation procedures are gaining a major role in benign prostate enlargement (BPE), especially in patients with larger prostates or under anticoagulant therapy. However, the superiority of one laser over the other has not been established yet, and the choice of technique is mainly deferred to the surgeon's expertise. In conclusion, lasers will further expand their horizon in endourology, allowing for instrument adaptation to challenging anatomy. Prospective, randomized clinical trials are however needed to confirm available results and to provide the optimal settings for each pathology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

33677987 5 Shrestha A., Corrales M., Adhikari B., Chapagain A., Traxer O. Comparison of low power and high power holmium YAG laser settings in flexible ureteroscopy. While LP Ho:YAG laser generators have demonstrated acceptable intraoperative and postoperative complication rates and stone-free rates (SFR), this technology still has certain limitations, especially regarding lithotripsy efficiency (measured in J/mm SP 3 sp ) and lithotripsy speed (mm SP 3 sp /s). This laser technology largely differs from Ho:YAG laser in several physical and technical aspects [[12]]. 34362169 14 Sierra A., Corrales M., Somani B., Traxer O. Laser Efficiency and Laser Safety: Holmium YAG vs. [Extracted from the article]

Purpose: To evaluate the current practice of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), conducting a worldwide survey among urologists with a special interest in endo-urology. Methods: A 22-question survey was specifically developed by the European Association of Urology (EAU) young academic urologists (YAU) and uro-technology (ESUT) groups and globally distributed via SurveyMonkey to almost 2000 members of Endourology Society. The questionnaire included questions dedicated to the demographics and general practice of the participating urologists. Results: In total, 441 responses (male/female ratio – 418/23) were received. A comparatively higher percentage of specialists (56.2%) practiced in academic institutions and had specific endo-urological fellowship training (56.7%). The classical prone PCNL remained the most practiced approach among the surveyed specialists, 47.7% stated to always do prone PCNLs, while 51.8% of respondents used multiple positioning options as required. The PCNL tract was mostly performed by urologists (84.3%) and fluoroscopic guidance was still predominantly used by 74.5% of respondents. The most practiced tract dilation method was balloon dilator used by 42% of respondents. Most of the surveyed urologists had ultrasonic, pneumatic or laser lithotripsy devices in their armamentarium. The use of some form of post-procedural drainage was reported in 85.1% of respondents, whereas tubeless PCNL remained a fairly uncommon practice. Conclusion: The majority of urologists still use prone positioning, get their own access under fluoroscopy guidance and use a balloon for tract dilation. However, we also identified that when necessary, urologists will deviate from routine practice and change strategy, adopting other approaches for PCNL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction The aim of this article was to evaluate the current perception of urologists as to what size is considered as a clinically insignificant residual fragment (CIRF). Material and methods A survey was globally distributed to the members of the Endourological Society via SurveyMonkey. Results A total of 385 participants responded to the survey on CIRF. Most participants considered 2 mm (29%) as CIRF threshold, followed by 3 mm (24%), 4 mm (22%), 0 mm (14%), 5 mm (8%) and 1 mm (3%). North American urologists considered CIRF to be smaller than urologists from Asia, Eurasia and South America, (p-values =0.001, 0.037 and 0.015 respectively). European urologists identified smaller CIRF in comparison to Asian urologists (p-value = 0.001). Urologists mainly using a pneumatic lithotripter accepted larger fragments as CIRF, compared to urologists mainly using ultrasonic devices or a combination of ultrasonic and pneumatic devices (p-value = 0.026 and 0.005 respectively). Similarly, urologists mainly performing X-Ray and ultrasound as post-operative imaging accepted larger fragments as CIRF in comparison to urologists mainly performing non-contrast computed tomography (p-value = 0.001). Conclusions What is considered as CIRF varies between urologist from different continents and seems to be associated with the lithotripter used and the post-operative imaging modality of preference to assess treatment success. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: With an increase in the prevalence of kidney stone disease (KSD), there has been a universal drive to develop reliable and user-friendly tools such as grading systems and predictive nomograms. An atlas of scoring systems (SS), grading tools, and nomograms in Endourology is provided in this article. Methods: A comprehensive search of world literature was performed to identify nomograms, grading systems, and classification tools in endourology related to KSD. Each of these was reviewed by the authors and has been evaluated in a narrative format with details on those that are externally validated and their respective citation count on google scholar. Results: A total of 54 endourological tools have been described in our atlas of endourological SS, grading tools, and nomograms. Of the tools, 23 (43%) have been published in the past 3 years showing an increasing interest in this area. This includes five for percutaneous nephrolithotomy, six for flexible ureteroscopy, three for semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS), nine for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, two for stent encrustations, three for intraoperative appearance at the time of URS, and three to classify intraoperative ureteric injury. There were three tools for renal colic assessment, one each for prediction of future stone event, stone classification, and stone impaction and two for need of emergency intervention in ureteral stone. Two tools are related to stone recurrence, whereas six are related to postprocedural complications. There are now two tools for simulation in endourology and five for patient-reported outcome measures. Conclusions: A number of reliable and established tools currently exist in endourology. Each of these offers their own respective advantages and disadvantages. Although nomograms and SS can help in the decision making, these must be tailored to individual patients based on their specific clinical scenarios, expectations, and informed consent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Although pediatric ureteroscopy has been increasingly performed, the evidence for its use in pediatric lower pole stones (LPS) is sparce. In this study we look at the effectiveness and outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy (FURSL) in the management of LPS for a pediatric population. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from two large European tertiary endourology centers that specialize in pediatric kidney stone management. The study was registered as an audit at the respective hospitals. All data were cross-checked and analyzed using electronic operative notes, discharge records, laboratory systems, and patient correspondence. The inclusion criteria were patients ≤16 years with LPS having an FURSL procedure. Results: A total of 57 pediatric patients underwent FURSL for LPS. The mean age was 10.1 ± 4.7 years (range: 1–16.9 years) with a male–female ratio of 2:3. The mean single stone size was 9.45 ± 3.9 mm (range: 3–20 mm) and 31 (54.4%) had multiple stones. A preoperative stent was present in 18 (31.6%) patients and a postoperative stent or ureteral catheter was left behind in 32 (56.1%) patients. The initial and final stone-free rates were 82.4% and 98.2%, respectively, with 1.19 procedures per patient performed to be stone free. Although there were no intraoperative complications, there were only four (7%) minor complications (Clavien I) noted that were all simple urinary infections. No long-term complications were noted. Conclusion: Flexible ureteroscopy and lasertripsy achieve excellent outcomes for treatment of pediatric LPS. Although some patients might need a second procedure for complete stone clearance, FURSL may be considered as the first-line treatment of LPS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoscopic technology is the cream of the crop for the urinary tract endoscopic procedures in our modern era of surgery. The idea of this review was to evaluate different characteristics of fiberoptic (FO), reusable digital (D) and disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes (FUs) and have an understanding of different comparisons in-between. The topics covered in this review comprise the visual characteristics, weight, costs, durability, and maneuverability aspects and size characteristics of different endoscopes. Digital FUs provide various advantages especially in terms of visual quality and durability. The new generation D-FUs also have excellent maneuverability, similar to FO ureteroscopes, but they are larger in size, which in turn can affect morbidity due to increased post-operative stenting and increased complication risk with larger ureteral access sheat and they come with higher costs. Many endourologists may prefer to use these high-tech, sophisticated devices as first line for their flexible ureteroscopy procedures as they provide excellent surgical outcomes. However, due to excellent maneuverability advantages in complicated anatomies, smaller sizes and lower costs, endourologists should always try to keep a FO FU ready for action in their operating rooms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate outcomes of pre-operative stent dwell time on infectious complications following ureteroscopy and stone treatment to identify a time cut-off. Material and Methods: Three tertiary referral centres in Europe retrospectively collected outcomes of ureteroscopy and laser fragmentation (URSL) for all patients with pre-operative indwelling ureteric stents over a period of up to 5 years. Data was collected on patient details, stone demographics, stent dwell time, complications and stone free rate (SFR). Matching for age, sex, operative time, stone size and post-operative stent insertion. To examine for a threshold effect, monthly cut-offs were used to compare post-ureteroscopic febrile UTIs. Binomial logistic regression was used (SPSS v.24) with a significance level set at 0.0036. The risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and the number needed to harm (NNH) are reported. Results: There were 467 patients with a pre-operative stent for analysis. These patients (n = 315) were matched to non-stented controls after excluding 152 patients to achieve adequate matching. There was a significant difference in rates of post-ureteroscopic febrile UTI between stented vs non-stented patients (RR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.10–6.48, p = 0.03). On adjustment, a dwell time of more than two months was associated with an increased risk of post-ureteroscopic febrile UTI (RR = 3.94, 95% CI: 1.30–12.01, p = 0.02), this increased risk rose with longer dwell time. At stent time longer than four months was associated with a significantly increased risk of post-ureteroscopic febrile UTI (5% vs. 15%, RR = 3.09, 95% CI: 1.56–6.10, p = 0.001), with the number needed to harm at 10. Conclusions: Overall infectious complication rates from URSL are low. The risk of post-operative UTI after four months of dwell time is nearly tripled compared to less than four months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: With the rise in the use of ureteroscopy and laser stone lithotripsy (URSL), a proportionate increase in the risk of post-procedural urosepsis has also been observed. The aims of our paper were to analyse the predictors for severe urosepsis using a machine learning model (ML) in patients that needed intensive care unit (ICU) admission and to make comparisons with a matched cohort. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted across nine high-volume endourology European centres for all patients who underwent URSL and subsequently needed ICU admission for urosepsis (Group A). This was matched by patients with URSL without urosepsis (Group B). Statistical analysis was performed with 'R statistical software' using the 'randomforests' package. The data were segregated at random into a 70% training set and a 30% test set using the 'sample' command. A random forests ML model was then built with n = 300 trees, with the test set used for internal validation. Diagnostic accuracy statistics were generated using the 'caret' package. Results: A total of 114 patients were included (57 in each group) with a mean age of 60 ± 16 years and a male:female ratio of 1:1.19. The ML model correctly predicted risk of sepsis in 14/17 (82%) cases (Group A) and predicted those without urosepsis for 12/15 (80%) controls (Group B), whilst overall it also discriminated between the two groups predicting both those with and without sepsis. Our model accuracy was 81.3% (95%, CI: 63.7–92.8%), sensitivity = 0.80, specificity = 0.82 and area under the curve = 0.89. Predictive values most commonly accounting for nodal points in the trees were a large proximal stone location, long stent time, large stone size and long operative time. Conclusion: Urosepsis after endourological procedures remains one of the main reasons for ICU admission. Risk factors for urosepsis are reasonably accurately predicted by our innovative ML model. Focusing on these risk factors can allow one to create predictive strategies to minimise post-operative morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]