Search

Background: The diagnostic yield of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) through endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-GS TBB) under virtual bronchoscopic navigation is unsatisfactory because radial EBUS probe is not always located within the lesion. Transbronchial needle aspiration with a guide sheath (GS-TBNA) has the potential to overcome the lower diagnostic yield by improving the relationship between the probe and the lesion and enabling repeated sampling while maintaining the location of a GS near the lesion. However, there are few data regarding the diagnostic yield and safety for diagnosing PPLs in this procedure., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive 363 lesions (83 lesions underwent GS-TBNA/EBUS-GS TBB and 280 lesions underwent EBUS-GS TBB) at our institution between April 1, 2019 and March 31, 2022. We investigated the diagnostic efficacy and complications of GS-TBNA/EBUS-GS TBB and compared them with those of EBUS-GS TBB., Results: The lesion size, distance from the hilum, presence of bronchus leading to the lesion, and EBUS images during the examination differed significantly between the two procedures. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for these 4 covariates revealed that GS-TBNA/EBUS-GS TBB was a significant factor affecting the diagnostic success of PPLs compared with EBUS-GS TBB (odds ratio=2.43, 95% CI=1.16-5.07, P=0.018). Neither procedure differed significantly in terms of complications (6.0% vs. 5.7%, P>0.999)., Conclusion: GS-TBNA performed in addition to EBUS-GS TBB might be a promising sampling method for improving the diagnostic yield for PPLs without increasing the incidence of complications., Competing Interests: Disclosure: There is no conflict of interest or other disclosures., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective Endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) and virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) improves the diagnostic yield in patients with peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). Most previous reports on EBUS-GS-guided transbronchial biopsy (TBB) have included patients with benign and malignant diseases. We aimed to determine the factors that predicted a successful diagnosis by EBUS-GS-guided TBB diagnostic in patients with small peripheral lung cancer, with a focus on the high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings before bronchoscopy. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 173 consecutive patients with 175 small (≤30 mm) PPLs who were diagnosed with primary lung cancer between June 2010 and October 2013 at Nagoya University Hospital. All patients underwent EBUS-GS-guided TBB with VBN using a ZioStation computer workstation (Ziosoft, Osaka, Japan). We analyzed the patient characteristics, HRCT findings, diagnostic yield, and the diagnostic factors in small peripheral lung carcinoma. Results The EBUS probe position was within the PPL in 83 of the 175 lesions (47%) and 112 (64.0%) cases were successfully diagnosed by EBUS-GS-guided TBB. A univariate analysis revealed that the following factors were associated with a significantly higher diagnostic yield: CT bronchus sign positivity, a lesion of >20 mm in diameter, a solid nodule, and a probe position that was within the lesion. The following factors were not significant: the lesion location, the number of biopsies, and the lung cancer histology. A multivariate analysis revealed that the following factors significantly affected the diagnostic yield: CT bronchus sign positivity [odds ratio (OR) =2.479]; a probe position that was within the lesion (OR=2.542); and a solid nodule (OR=2.304). Conclusion The significant factors that were significantly associated with a successful diagnosis using EBUS-GS-guided TBB in small peripheral lung carcinoma were as follows: CT bronchus sign positivity, a solid nodule, and a probe position that was within the lesion.

Aim: The usefulness and safety of endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) have been established recently, but no study has evaluated whether or not aging increases the risk of the procedure. In the present study, we aimed to assess the usefulness and safety of EBUS-TBNA in older patients., Methods: The medical records and database of 109 patients who received EBUS-TBNA between 2008 and 2011 at Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan were reviewed retrospectively. All patients underwent bronchoscopy under light sedation with midazolam. A total of 34 patients were aged 70 years or older (the older group) and 75 were aged 69 years or younger (the younger group). We analyzed patients' characteristics, changes of clinical parameters, usage doses of midazolam and lidocaine, procedure duration, geographic data of biopsied lymph nodes, diagnostic yield, and complications in both groups., Results: There were more comorbidities in the older group. Four patients (11.8%) in the older group had poor performance status (2-3). Systolic blood pressure at baseline was significantly higher in the older group. There were no statistical differences between the two groups in some clinical parameters (minimum oxygen saturation [SpO2 ], reduction in SpO2 , maximum oxygen supplementation, elevation of systolic blood pressure, increase of heart rate) during the procedure. Diagnostic performance in older patients was similar to that found in younger patients. There was no difference in the frequency of complications between both groups., Conclusion: Safety and usefulness of EBUS-TBNA in older people were comparable with those in younger people., (© 2013 Japan Geriatrics Society.)