Search

This is a critical review of the data supporting current endoscopic surgical techniques for the spine, limitations, economic barriers to adoption, and the future of the field. Endoscopic spine approaches can be applied to all levels of the spine, with many robust trials supporting its clinical outcomes. Although financial limitations with starting an endoscopic program can be justified by its cost effectiveness and positive societal impact, challenges facing its widespread adoption are present and more endoscopic spine programs are needed. Technological advancements will further enhance endoscopic techniques as they become an integral part of a spine surgeon's repertoire., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) in the management of high-grade migrated Lumbar disc herniation (LDH)., Methods: A total of 328 patients who underwent PEID for high-grade migrated LDH between May 2020 and January 2023 in our hospital were selected. Patients were categorized into high-grade migrated group and low-grade migrated group according to preoperative MRI findings. The preoperative and postoperative evaluations of clinical outcomes, such as Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for lower backs and legs, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria for surgical success, were compared between groups., Results: No statistically significant differences were found in hospitalization time, surgery time, intraoperative hemorrhage, number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, or incision length between the two groups. The lower back and leg VAS scores and ODI exhibited a statistically significant decrease in both groups across all postoperative time intervals. However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Postoperative nerve root stimulation symptoms were reported in two and three cases in the high-grade migrated group and low-grade migrated group, respectively. One patient in the high-grade migrated group underwent reoperation due to re-herniation at the same segment. There was no significant difference in the rate of excellent-good cases between the two groups, with an overall rate of 94.7%., Conclusion: In treating high-grade migrated disc herniation, PEID offers advantages such as reduced trauma, small incision, quicker recovery and satisfactory clinical safety and efficacy., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.)

Background: Endoscopic spine surgery has recently grown in popularity due to the potential benefits of reduced pain and faster recovery time as compared to open surgery. Biportal spinal endoscopy has been successfully applied to lumbar disc herniations and lumbar spinal stenosis. Obesity is associated with increased risk of complications in spine surgery. Few prior studies have investigated the impact of obesity and associated medical comorbidities with biportal spinal endoscopy., Methods: This study was a prospectively collected, retrospectively analyzed comparative cohort design. Patients were divided into cohorts of normal body weight (Bone Mass Index (BMI)18.0-24.9), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9) and obese (BMI > 30.0) as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO). Patients underwent biportal spinal endoscopy by a single surgeon at a single institution for treatment of lumbar disc herniations and lumbar spinal stenosis. Demographic data, surgical complications, and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. Statistics were calculated amongst treatment groups using analysis of variance and chi square where appropriate. Statistical significance was determined as p < 0.05., Results: Eighty-four patients were followed. 26 (30.1%) were normal BMI, 35 (41.7%) were overweight and 23 (27.4%) were obese. Patients with increasing BMI had correspondingly greater American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) scores. There were no significant differences in VAS Back, VAS Leg, and ODI scores, or postoperative complications among the cohorts. There were no cases of surgical site infections in the cohort. All cohorts demonstrated significant improvement up to 1 year postoperatively., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that obesity is not a risk factor for increased perioperative complications with biportal spinal endoscopy and has similar clinical outcomes and safety profile as compared to patients with normal BMI. Biportal spinal endoscopy is a promising alternative to traditional techniques to treat common lumbar pathology., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: Thoracic spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare but dangerous condition, and traditional surgical methods are accompanied by extensive trauma and approach-related complications. Here we introduce the technique of full-endoscopic transforaminal debridement and decompression and evaluate its feasibility for treating brucellar thoracic SEA., Methods: We performed thoracic full-endoscopic transforaminal decompression and debridement on two patients with neurological deficits caused by brucellar SEA, which is mainly composed of granulation tissue rather than pus. Postoperative MRI was conducted to confirm the presence of any residual abscess compressing the nerves. Frankel grading was employed to assess the recovery of neurological function, and complications were documented., Results: There were no occurrences of dural tear, postoperative hematoma, or pulmonary complications. Their neurological function had significantly improved after surgery, and postoperative MRI confirmed no residual abscess compressing the spinal cord. During the 2-year follow-up, one patient achieved complete recovery (from Frankel-C to Frankel-E), while another patient improved from Frankel-A to Frankel-D. Neither patient experienced infection recurrence, instability, nor kyphotic deformity., Conclusion: We described the novel application of transforaminal endoscopic surgery in brucellar thoracic granulomatous SEA and preliminarily indicated the feasibility of this technique as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery., (© 2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: The reported date in the repeat surgical intervention for adolescent lumbar disc herniation (ALDH) after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) was quite scarce. This study aims to introduce cases of repeat surgeries after PELD for ALDH and assess the incidence, chief causes, repeat surgery methods, and surgical outcomes of repeat surgeries after PELD for ALDH., Methods: A retrospective multicenter observational study was conducted on patients undergoing repeat surgeries after PELD for ALDH at four tertiary referral hospitals from January 2014 through August 2022. The incidence of repeat surgeries, chief causes, strategies for repeat surgeries, and timing of repeat surgeries were recorded and analyzed. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) scores and the modified MacNab criteria. Statistical analyses were performed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test., Results: A total of 23 patients who underwent repeat surgeries after PELD for ALDH were included. The chief causes were re-herniation (homo-lateral re-herniation at the same level, new disc herniation of adjacent level). The repeat surgery methods were revision PELD, micro-endoscopic discectomy (MED), open discectomy and instrumented lumbar inter-body fusion. The NRS scores decreased significantly in follow-up evaluations and these scores demonstrated significant improvement at the last follow-up (p < 0.002). For the modified MacNab criteria, at the last follow-up, 18 patients (78.26%) had an excellent outcome, and the overall success rate was 86.95%., Conclusion: This study's data suggest that young patients who underwent repeat surgery improved significantly compared to baseline. The chief cause was re-herniation. Revision PELD was the main surgical procedure, which provides satisfactory clinical results in young patients who underwent repeat surgeries., (© 2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: Questions regarding anticipated pain improvement and functional recovery postsurgery are frequently posed in preoperative consultations. However, a lack of data characterizing outcomes for the first postoperative days only allows for anecdotal answers. Hence, the assessment of ultra-early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is essential for patient-provider communication and patient satisfaction. The aim of this study was to elucidate this research gap by assessing and characterizing PROMs for the first days after full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS)., Methods: This multicenter study included patients undergoing lumbar FESS from March 2021 to July 2023. After informed consent was provided, data were collected prospectively through a smartphone application. Patients underwent either discectomy or decompression. Analyzed parameters included demographics, surgical details, visual analog scale scores for both back and leg pain, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. Data were acquired daily for the 1st postoperative week, as well as after 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months., Results: A total of 182 patients were included, of whom 102 underwent FESS discectomy and 80 underwent FESS decompression. Significant differences between the discectomy and decompression groups were found for age (mean 50.45 ± 15.28 years and 63.85 ± 13.25 years, p < 0.001; respectively), sex (p = 0.007), and surgery duration (73.45 ± 45.23 minutes vs 98.05 ± 46.47 minutes, p < 0.001; respectively). Patients in both groups reported a significant amelioration of leg pain on the 1st postoperative day (discectomy group VAS score: 6.2 ± 2.6 vs 2.4 ± 2.9, p < 0.001; decompression group: 5.3 ± 2.8 vs 1.9 ± 2.2, p < 0.001) and of back pain within the 1st postoperative week (discectomy group VAS score: 5.5 ± 2.8 vs 2.8 ± 2.2, p < 0.001; decompression group: 5.2 ± 2.7 vs 3.1 ± 2.4, p < 0.001). ODI score improvement was most pronounced at the 3-month time point (discectomy group: 21.7 ± 9.1 vs 9.3 ± 9.1, p < 0.001; decompression group: 19.3 ± 7.8 vs 9.9 ± 8.3, p < 0.001). For both groups, pain improvement within the 1st week after surgery was highly predictive of later benefits., Conclusions: Ultra-early PROMs reveal an immediate pain improvement after FESS. While the benefits in pain reduction plateaued within the 1st postoperative week for both groups, functional improvements developed over a more extended period. These results illustrate a biphasic rehabilitation process wherein initial pain alleviation transitions into functional improvement over time.

Objective: To describe the perioperative clinical features, management, and outcomes of patients with seizure after percutaneous endoscopic spine surgery (PESS)., Methods: Patients who experienced seizure after PESS in a tertiary orthopedic hospital between January 2016 and June 2022 were retrospectively recruited, and patient charts were reviewed., Results: Twenty-nine patients were recruited, and the incidence of seizure after PESS was 0.52%. The operation time was 110.0 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 82.5-235.0 minutes) and the irrigation speed was 109.0 mL/minute (IQR, 86.5-145.5 mL/minute). Definitive dural tears were reported in 15 patients (51.7%). In addition to agitation and myotonia, significant increased respiratory rate (29.9 ± 6.5 breaths/minute), tachycardia (112.1 ± 20.6 beats/minute), and hypertension (systolic, 189.5 ± 21.9 mm Hg; diastolic, 98.3 ± 10.6 mm Hg) were observed. Arterial blood gas analysis showed hypocapnia, metabolic acidosis, and hyperlactatemia. All patients received analgesia and sedation as well as hyperosmolar therapy. The estimated duration of seizure was 3.0 hours (IQR, 2.5-4.0 hours) and the postoperative length of hospital stay was 3.0 (IQR, 3.0-5.5) days. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and visual analog scale score improved markedly within 6 months after surgery., Conclusions: Despite the low incidence and short duration, seizure after PESS should be considered a critical and urgent syndrome. Management strategies for seizure mainly involve intensive care, securing the airway, analgesia and sedation, hyperosmolar therapy, and negative fluid balance. No significant adverse effects of seizure on clinical outcomes were observed during 6 months of follow-up., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The utilization of indirect visualization during procedures has been increasingly replacing traditional forms of direct visualization across many different surgical specialties. The adoption of arthroscopy, using small cameras placed inside joints, has transformed musculoskeletal care over the last several decades, allowing surgeons to provide the same anatomic solutions with less tissue dissection, resulting in lower requirements for inpatient care, reduced costs, and expedited recovery.  For a variety of reasons, spine surgery has lagged behind other specialties in the adoption of indirect visualization.  Nonetheless, patient demand for less invasive spine procedures and surgeon drive to provide these solutions and improve care quality has driven global adoption of spinal endoscopy.  There are numerous endoscopic platforms and techniques currently utilized, and these systems are rapidly evolving.  Additionally, the variance in technology and health system incentives across the globe has generated tremendous regional heterogeneity in the utilization of spinal endoscopic procedures.  We present a consolidated review, including the background, evidence, techniques, and trends in spinal endoscopy, so that clinicians can gain a deeper understanding of this rapidly evolving domain of spinal healthcare., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This report describes a minimally invasive lumbar foraminotomy technique that can be applied in patients who underwent complex spine decompression procedures or in patients with severe foraminal stenosis., Methods: Awake, endoscopic decompression surgery was performed in 538 patients over a 5-year period between 2014 and 2019. Transforaminal endoscopic foraminal decompression surgery using a high-speed endoscopic drill was performed in 34 patients who had previously undergone fusions at the treated level., Results: At 2-year follow-up, the mean (± SD) preoperative visual analog scale score for leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index improved from 7.1 (± 1.5) and 40.1% (± 12.1%) to 2.1 (± 1.9) and 13.6% (± 11.1%)., Conclusions: A minimally invasive, awake procedure is presented for the treatment of severe lumbar foraminal stenosis in patients with lumbar radiculopathy after lumbar fusion.

Background: Stable water dynamics during endoscopic spine surgery improves the surgeon's comfort and patient's outcomes. We aimed to measure the water dynamics during spinal surgery and identify the factors that facilitate stable water dynamics., Methods: This open-label, prospective, proficiency-matched, in vivo study included patients with single-level degenerative spinal disease. After assessing their heights and balancing the matched instrument, we measured the irrigation fluid pressure in various situations. We performed multiple regression analysis based on odds ratio (OR), confidence interval (CI), and relationships (proficiency-matched) with possible instrumental and physical characteristics. The instrumental factors were the presence and length of a rigid cannulation, and the physical characteristics were body mass index (body mass index [BMI]), skin-to-dura depth, height (interaction with BMI), and body weight (interaction with BMI)., Results: Of the 36 patients, 29 were included. The mean pressure of the operation cavity was 16.66 ± 9.12 cm H 2 O (12.25 ± 6.71 mm Hg). Water pressure with the rigid cannulation (9.41 ± 2.94 cm H 2 O [6.92 ± 2.16 mm Hg]) was significantly lower than that without cannulation (23.43 ± 7.57 cm H 2 O [17.26 ± 5.57 mm Hg], P < 0.01). Water pressure correlated with cannular length (OR = -1.08, CI = -1.79, -0.37, P < 0.01) and BMI (OR = 0.56, CI = 0.12, 0.99, P < 0.01). BMI showed a proportional relationship (r = 0.84, P < 0.01)., Conclusions: During biportal endoscopy, we suggest maintaining water pressure between 4.41 cm H 2 O (2.41 mm Hg) and 31.00 cm H 2 O (22.83 mm Hg). Compared to physical characteristics, placement of the cannula and appropriate cannula length are important factors that affect water dynamics., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recently, spine surgery has gradually evolved from conventional open surgery to minimally invasive surgery, and endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) has become an important procedure in minimally invasive spine surgery. With improvements in the optics, spine endoscope, endoscopic burr, and irrigation pump, the indications of ESS are gradually widening from lumbar to cervical and thoracic spine. ESS was not only used previously for disc herniations that were contained without migration but is also used currently for highly migrated disc herniations and spinal stenosis; thus, the indications of ESS will be further expanded. Although ESS has certain advantages such as less soft tissue dissection and muscle trauma, reduced blood loss, less damage to the epidural blood supply and consequent less epidural fibrosis and scarring, reduced hospital stay, early functional recovery, and improvement of quality of life as well as better cosmesis, several obstacles remain for ESS to be widespread because it has a steep learning curve and surgical outcome is strongly dependent on the surgeon's skillfulness. A solid surgical technique requires reproducibility and ensured safety in addition to surgical outcomes. In this review article, how to improve ESS was investigated by grafting novel technologies such as navigation, robotics, and 3-dimensional and ultraresolution visualization., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

After the completion of an endoscopic spinal surgery fellowship, the next challenge for the newly minted consultant is to set up a viable and sustainable endoscopic practice. A successful practice of endoscopic spine surgery is dependent on several factors, such as anesthetic support; surgical expertise; support for provision and maintenance of endoscopic equipment; cost of equipment; administrative and nursing support; postoperative care services to optimize patients' outcome and satisfaction; patients' ideas, concerns, and expectations, as well as continuing medical education. In this article, a perspective is given on the early career challenges that a fellowship-trained endoscopic surgeon may encounter in the period leading to first successful endoscopic spinal surgery., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A severe grade I and grade II spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 creates an anatomic distortion that can compress the traversing S1 nerve with a retropulsed S1 vertebral body endplate and (sometimes) herniated disc., Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility for awake, endoscopic treatment of symptomatic radiculopathy secondary to the deformity that results from the retropulsed superior endplate of S1 in grade I/II L5-S1 spondylolisthesis in patients with and without previous fusion surgery., Study Design: Retrospective chart review., Setting: This study took place in a single-center, academic hospital., Methods: In 325 patients over 4 years there were 19 patients (8 with previous L5-S1 fusions and 11 without) treated with transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery for decompression of the neural foramen at L5-S1 in the setting of spondylolisthesis (at least 5 mm) and a retropulsed superior vertebral endplate of S1., Results: The average preoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back and leg scores were 6.1 and 6.7, and the average preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score was 50.4. The average 1-year VAS back and leg scores were 2.2 and 2.2, and the average 1-year postoperative ODI score was 20.5. There was no statistically significant difference between the fusion and nonfusion groups. Patients treated were patients who presented with an S1 or L5 and S1 radiculopathy as their primary complaint and a L5-S1 spondylolisthesis of 5 mm or greater. Patients treated had no instability on flexion-extension x-rays. Eleven patients had not had fusions at L5-S1, and 8 patients had previous fusions at L5-S1 but still had a spondylolisthesis of at least 5 mm. The average slip for nonfusion patients was 8.4 mm, and the average slip for fusion patients was 8.8 mm. At 1-year follow-up the improvement in VAS back scores was 44% in the nonfusion group and 49% in the fusion group, and the improvement in VAS leg scores was 84% in the nonfusion group and 58% in the fusion group. At 1-year follow-up the improvement in ODI scores was 63% in the nonfusion group and 54% in the fusion group., Limitations: Retrospective case series., Conclusions: Awake, endoscopic surgery for the treatment of radiculopathy in the setting of a grade I/II L5-S1 spondylolisthesis is a viable minimally invasive treatment option for patients with radiculopathy in the setting of a stable L5-S1 spondylolisthesis with foraminal narrowing caused by a retropulsed superior endplate of the S1 vertebral body.

Background: The lateral fusion procedure is a newer minimally invasive approach to indirectly decompressing and fusing a lumbar motion segment. As with many new procedures, new thoughtful approaches to recognizing and treating the complications of these procedures need to be developed., Objectives: Here we describe our experience with transforaminal endoscopic decompression for complications of lateral and oblique lumbar fusion., Study Design: Retrospective case review., Setting: This was a multicenter study that took place in an academic hospital, community hospital, and ambulatory surgery center., Methods: An endoscopic treatment technique for 4 types of complications associated with lateral and oblique fusion is presented. We retrospectively reviewed cases at 3 centers in 2 countries of patients who underwent transforaminal endoscopic surgery for the treatment of lateral fusion complications in a 4-year period with a minimum follow-up of 1 year., Results: A preliminary series of 4 patients with an average age of 74.8 years (range, 69-82 years) who underwent transforaminal endoscopic procedures at the level of their lateral and oblique lumbar fusions between 2014 and 2018 is presented. Disc herniations, heterotopic bone formation, endplate fracture, and nerve root impingement by the interbody device were all treated endoscopically., Limitations: Small case series evaluated retrospectively with 1-year follow-up., Conclusions: Transforaminal endoscopic surgery is a useful minimally invasive surgical technique to treat several complications associated with lateral and oblique lumbar interbody fusion procedures.

Background: Identifying the histopathological diagnosis of a spinal tumor is the necessary step prior to pursuing subsequent treatment. Both minimally invasive and open spinal procedures have been described as useful methods of obtaining tumor tissue for diagnosis but differ by their limitations. Minimally invasive techniques, such as computed tomography-guided biopsies, can expose the patient to radiation, and the tissue obtained may be nondiagnostic. Tubular and open procedures require collateral soft-tissue damage and may require bony removal leading to iatrogenic injury. Endoscopic approaches to the spine can be employed to avoid treatment delay in diagnosis, decrease length of stay, and provide adequate tissue for diagnosis., Methods: We describe the surgical planning, tumor localization, and transforaminal endoscopic approach for tissue diagnosis of a lumbar spinal mass in a patient with a known history of Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma after a nondiagnostic computed tomography- guided biopsy. Final histopathological diagnosis of the lumbar spinal mass was consistent with large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma., Conclusions: We demonstrate the application of an endoscopic transforaminal approach in spine oncology. We also describe our technique on how we use a beveled working channel to obtain a large tissue core sample for definitive diagnosis., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lumbar disk herniation can be successfully treated by lumbar endoscopic spinal procedures. However, one of the most important disadvantages of the endoscopic methods used is radiation exposure. There are multiple endoscopic spinal procedures and this study aims to compare unilateral biportal endoscopic diskectomy (UBED), percutaneous endoscopic lumbar diskectomy (PELD), and microendoscopic diskectomy (MED) methods in terms of radiation exposure., Methods: A total of 75 people were included in this prospective and multicenter study. The demographic characteristics, operating times (minutes), levels of surgery, lumbar disk herniation types, radiation exposures (dose area product [DAP]), and fluoroscopy times (seconds) of the groups were compared., Results: Mean DAP values were 1.39 Gy·cm 2 in the UBED group, 2.46 Gy·cm 2 in the PELD group, and 1.01 Gy·cm 2 in the MED group. The UBED group had no statistically significant difference with the MED and PELD groups in terms of DAP (P = 0.281 and P = 0.058, respectively), whereas the PELD group had statistically significantly higher DAP values than the MED group (P = 0.016). The maximum mean duration of fluoroscopy usage time was 34.9 seconds in the PELD group, 19.3 seconds in the UBED group, and 4.6 seconds in the MED group. The differences between the groups were significant (P ≤ 0.001)., Conclusions: The more the level of invasiveness is reduced in spinal surgery, the greater the exposure to radiation. In this study, the groups are listed as PELD > UBED > MED according to the duration and level of radiation exposure., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate the quantity and quality of articles in the field of full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) from different countries and assess characteristics of worldwide research productivity., Methods: Articles published from 1997 to July 23, 2018, were screened using the Web of Science database. All studies were assessed for the following parameters: the number of total publications, h-index, contribution of countries, authors, journals, and institutions., Results: A total of 408 articles were identified between 1997 and 2018. Between 1997 and 2017, the number of published articles tended to increase by 41 times. The largest number of articles was from China (30.15%), followed by South Korea (28.68%), the USA (13.97%), Germany (9.31%), and Japan (4.90%). The highest h-index was found for articles from South Korea (23), followed by the USA (18), Germany (16), China (11), and Japan (7). The highest number of articles was published in World Neurosurgery (12.50%), followed by Pain Physician (10.29%), Spine (6.62%), European Spine Journal (4.66%), and Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine (4.17%). Wooridul Spine Hospital published the largest number of articles (10.29%), followed by Tongji University (5.88%), University of Witten/Herdecke (5.39%), Brown University (5.15%), and Third Military Medical University (3.43%)., Conclusions: The number of articles published in the field of FESS has increased rapidly in the past 20 years. In terms of quantity, China is the most contributive country based on the number of publications. High-quality papers as measured by h-index and the large quantity is from South Korea (second only to China). These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Context/Objective: Trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression (SELD) is an alternative to microscopic open lumbar discectomy (OLD). SELD and OLD for L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation (LDH) have not been compared. We compared clinical results, including pain control, between SELD and OLD. Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: Korean hospital. Participants: Eighty patients treated with SELD (n = 40) or microscopic OLD (n = 40) for L5-S1 LDH. Interventions: N/A. Outcome Measures: Clinical data were compared over 6 months. Functional status was evaluated using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, 0-100%) and time to return to work. Preoperative and postoperative pain was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-10). Radiological assessment was performed preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: The ODI and VAS scores for leg and back pain significantly improved in both groups. At 6-months after the procedure, the average ODI decreased to 13.2 ± 11.2 from 54.5 ± 14.5 for SELD and 9.5 ± 10.4 from 57.5 ± 16.0 for OLD. The average leg VAS decreased to 1.9 ± 1.2 from 6.0 ± 1.4 for SELD and 2.3 ± 1.3 from 6.7 ± 1.6 for OLD. Back VAS reduced to 2.6 ± 1.3 from 7.2 ± 1.5 for OLD. Time to return to work was 1.1 ± 1.1 weeks for SELD and 5.4 ± 2.1 weeks for OLD. Clinical outcomes of SELD were non-inferior to those of OLD in terms of pain control. Conclusion: A scar-free procedure and early return to normal life are advantages of SELD.

Background: Cysts of the ligamentum flavum (LF) are rare occurrences, with only a few cases reported in literature. They are a result of age-related degenerative changes in the LF. The cyst compresses the neural elements and causes neurogenic symptoms. Endoscopic resection of the LF cyst has not been described in literature. In this report, we describe our experience with endoscopic resection of an LF cyst in the L3-L4 region., Case Description: A 54-year-old female patient presented with claudication in both lower limbs and evidence on magnetic resonance imaging of a LF cyst in the L3-L4 region compressing the neural elements. The patient underwent full endoscopic resection of the LF cyst through the interlaminar approach from the left side with preservation of facet joints. The postoperative clinical outcomes improved significantly, and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging revealed a complete removal of the cyst., Conclusions: Full-endoscopic resection may be considered as a viable option for treatment of LF cyst in the lumbar region., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Perineural cysts are a benign spine pathology but, when they become symptomatic and require surgical treatment, represent a significant challenge to the spine surgeon. Here we describe our experience with a novel endoscopic approach to the biopsy, drainage, resection of the cyst wall, and direct cyst fenestration to the subarachnoid space., Methods: A transforaminal endoscopic approach to a large lumbar 2-3 perineural cyst is presented here in a 25-year-old patient. A step-by-step technique for the biopsy, drainage, and resection of the cyst wall is presented., Results: The patient underwent cyst resection and fenestration into the subarachnoid space without complication, with immediate relief of his preoperative symptoms and after 1 year remains symptom-free., Conclusions: Surgical treatment of perineural cysts in the spine represent a significant challenge to the surgeon, principally due to the risk of spinal fluid leak in the postoperative period. Transforaminal endoscopic surgical access to this disease pathology is a novel minimally invasive surgical approach presented here that allows diagnosis and treatment of a perineural cyst and can be performed in an awake patient., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

OBJECTIVEThe management of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with concurrent scoliosis and/or spondylolisthesis remains controversial. Full-endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) facilitates neural decompression while preserving stabilizing osseoligamentous structures and may be uniquely suited for the treatment of LSS with concurrent mild to moderate degenerative deformity. The safety and efficacy of full-endoscopic versus minimally invasive surgery (MIS) ULBD in this patient population is studied here for the first time.METHODSA retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted on 45 consecutive LSS patients with concurrent scoliosis (≥ 10° coronal Cobb angle) and/or spondylolisthesis (≥ 3 mm). Patient demographics, operative details, complications, and imaging characteristics were reviewed. Outcomes were quantified using back and leg visual analog scale (VAS) scores and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year.RESULTSA total of 26 patients underwent full-endoscopic and 19 underwent MIS-ULBD with an average follow-up period of 12 months. The endoscopic cohort experienced a significantly shorter hospital length of stay (p = 0.014) and fewer adverse events (p = 0.010). Both cohorts experienced significant improvements in VAS and ODI scores at all time points (p < 0.001), but the endoscopic cohort demonstrated significantly better early ODI scores (p = 0.024).CONCLUSIONSEndoscopic and MIS-ULBD result in similar functional outcomes for LSS with mild to moderate deformity, while the endoscopic approach demonstrates a favorable rate of complications. Further studies are required to better delineate the characteristics of spinal deformities amenable to this approach and the durability of functional results.

Objective: The incidental dural tear is a common complication in lumbar spine surgery. It has been reported that the incidence of dural tears is much greater in endoscopic procedures. Primary closure via suturing remains challenging in endoscopic procedures. The objective of this study was to conduct a literature review on the surgical technique for dural closure and repair in endoscopic spine surgery., Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the database PubMed. In total, 12 studies reported specifically about the surgical treatment for dural tear in percutaneous and tubular assisted endoscopic technique. The dural tear rate, the technique of dural closure, postoperative time of bed rest, postoperative symptoms related to cerebrospinal fluid fistula, and revision surgery were assessed., Results: The overall rate of dural tears in endoscopic spinal surgery was 2.7%, with a range from 0% to 8.6%. The incidence of a dural tear was much greater in cases with lumbar stenosis (3.7%) than in lumbar disc herniation (2.1%). The greatest rate was accompanied by resecting synovial cysts. In addition, the risk of dural tear is greater in bilateral decompression procedures via a unilateral approach. There is no consensus about the ideal technique for dural closure in endoscopic procedures. Furthermore, there is a debate whether dural tear requires surgical treatment or not., Conclusions: An autologous muscle or fat graft in combination with fibrin glue or a fibrin-sealed collagen sponge seems to be a good and safe method for the management of dural tear in lumbar endoscopic spine surgery., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion is considered for the treatment of degenerative sacroiliitis. The procedure has increased in popularity for patients who have exhausted less invasive treatment options since the development of percutaneous SI joint fusion systems. One possible complication of the procedure is a sacral radiculopathy that can result from compression of the S1 nerve by the SI joint fusion implant. Others have described revising the implant by removing it and replacing it with a shorter implant., Methods: Here we describe a minimally invasive endoscopic S1 nerve root decompression that does not require removing or revising the SI fusion implant., Results: The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient's radicular pain improved immediately after surgery. Six months after his endoscopic procedure, the patient had no clinical symptoms related to the S1 nerve root compression and was symptomatically improved from her sacroiliac pain., Conclusions: This technical note is for others to consider as a possible minimally invasive solution for the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy after a minimally invasive SI joint fusion procedure., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Intradural disk herniation is a rare entity with <0.3%-1% of all disk herniations and at an L2-L3 level even rarer. The dural defects repairs on ventral aspect are technically challenging and may not be possible after durotomy, so many authors have placed fascia, muscle, or plugging by the hemostatic material. The surgical treatment of intradural disk herniation is usually posterior open surgery with formal durotomy to remove the disk fragments with good to fair results. Poorer outcome occurs in late-presenting cases., Case Report: We report on a 78-year-old man who presented with spontaneous low back pain and bilateral buttock pain aggravated for 1 month with severe walking difficulty without bowel and bladder symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed disk herniation at the L2-L3 level. He underwent a transforaminal endoscopic removal of intradural disk fragments via the original rent in the anterolateral aspect of the dura, and sealing was performed with dural patch and Gelfoam without any lumbar drain. The patient's symptom significantly improved postoperatively with muscle power improved to grade 5 on day 1 with no cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and he was mobilized with a lumbar orthosis on the first postoperative day. Postoperative and at 6-month follow-up, magnetic resonance imaging revealed adequate decompression and successful sealing of the ventral dural defect., Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first case of transforaminal endoscopic treatment of intradural disk herniation at an L2-L3 level in which good clinical outcomes were obtained and maintained until recent follow-up of 8 months., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lateral subluxation of the vertebra is commonly seen in degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery is an emerging technique in spine surgery but has never been described as a treatment option for lumbar radiculopathy in the setting of lateral lumbar spondylolisthesis., Methods: A technique for endoscopic treatment of lumbar disc herniation in the setting of lateral spondylolisthesis is presented. We retrospectively reviewed 199 cases of patients who underwent transforaminal endoscopic surgery in a 3-year period with a minimum follow-up of 1 year., Results: Between 2014 and 2017, 4 patients (average age, 74.8 years; range, 69-82 years) underwent transforaminal endoscopic discectomy procedures for disc herniations at the level of lateral subluxation. One patient whose lateral subluxation was above an instrumented fusion required an extension of fusion to the operated level 5 months after endoscopic surgery for a reherniation. For the other 3 patients, mean visual analog scale score for radicular pain improved from an average pain score of 8.3 before surgery to 3.0 1 year after surgery, and Oswestry Disability Index improved from 26.7 to 4.7., Conclusions: Transforaminal endoscopic surgery for lumbar disc herniation in the setting of lateral subluxation of vertebral bodies is a unique minimally invasive approach for treatment of lumbar radiculopathy that might be considered as an alternative treatment to deformity correction surgery in older patients., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Surgical options for removing high-grade down-migrated lumbar disc herniations located medial to the pedicle include an extensive laminectomy and facetectomy. A direct percutaneous endoscopic approach through the pedicle for reaching the herniated disc without risk of iatrogenic instability is feasible., Method: The transpedicular approach consists of creating a tunnel through the pedicle. Subsequently, access to the parapedicular epidural space is obtained, and downward migrated disc can be removed., Conclusion: This technique allows to reach migrated herniations medially to the pedicle safely and effectively.

Background: Acute bilateral isolated foot drop due to lumbar disk prolapse with canal stenosis is rare with only 3 cases reported in literature. Our patient was managed using the percutaneous full endoscopic technique. This is mainly to highlight the ease of access and patient outcome with preoperative and postoperative images to support our minimally invasive treatment for this rare condition., Case Description: A 46-year-old male presented with sudden-onset severe back pain with bilateral foot drop. Clinical examination showed a bilateral L5 radiculopathy with normal perianal sensation. Investigations excluded other causes of bilateral foot drop. A magnetic resonance imaging scan showed disk herniation at the right L4-L5 (inferior migrated) and L5-S1 level (paracentral and extraforaminal) with spinal canal stenosis at the L2-L3 and L5-S1 levels due to ligamentum flavum hypertrophy. The patient underwent percutaneous endoscopic stenosis lumbar decompression at the L2-L3 and L5-S1 level. At the right L4-L5, L5-S1 level, transforaminal endoscopic diskectomy was done using the conventional percutaneous approach. The inferior migrated disk of the L4-L5 level was removed using a left L5-S1 contralateral approach. The patient recovered with favorable outcome and added benefits of minimally invasive surgery., Conclusion: Lumbar disk prolapse with canal stenosis should be considered in patients presenting with bilateral isolated foot drop. To our best knowledge, this is the first report of percutaneous endoscopic treatment to address multiple-lumbar-level pathology for this rare condition of acute bilateral isolated foot drop., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Trans-sacral epiduroscopic lumbar decompression (SELD) is an emerging procedure for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH), with favorable outcomes having been reported. However, the complications associated with SELD have not been comprehensively evaluated to date. Therefore, the aim of our study was to describe the incidence rate, types, and characteristics of complications following SELD and management outcomes., Methods: Retrospective analysis of the surgical and clinical outcomes for 127 patients (average age, 42.2 ± 15.2 years) who underwent SELD for LDH at L2-3, L3-4, L4-5, and/or L5-S1, performed by a single experienced spine surgeon at a single center, between January 2015 and April 2017, was conducted., Results: All procedures were successful, with a mean follow-up of 12.3 ± 2.3 months. Complications were identified in 8 patients (6.3%), including 3 cases of incomplete decompression (2.4%), 2 cases of recurrent disc herniation (1.6%), and one case each of hematoma, dural tearing, and subchondral osteonecrosis (0.8%). Among these cases with complications, only 2 cases with incomplete decompression and one case with recurrent LDH did not improve with conservative treatment and required re-operation using an open approach. The rate of complications decreased from 12.6% when considering only the first 50 cases to 2.6% for cases 51-127., Conclusions: Incomplete decompression, recurrent herniation, epidural hematoma, dural tear, and subchondral osteonecrosis were identified as complications of SELD, although the overall rate of complications was low. Practice with the procedure and careful patient selection can lower the risk of complications.

Objective: Endoscopic surgery for highly migrated lumbar disk extrusions is a challenge even for spine surgeons who are familiar with using endoscopic techniques. Because of the anatomic constraints involved in transforaminal access in endoscopic surgery, an incomplete removal of a highly migrated disk extrusion can result in some cases. Here the authors describe a new technique for accessing extruded lumbar disks that have migrated into the canal directly through a transpedicular approach., Methods: A technique for the endoscopic treatment of highly migrated lumbar disk extrusions is presented. Retrospectively, we reviewed a series of 21 consecutive patients operated on with lumbar 3-4, lumbar 4-5, and lumbar 5-sacral 1 highly migrated disk extrusions: preoperative and postoperative clinical data with 1-year follow-up., Results: A preliminary series of 11 male and 10 female patients with an average age of 56.9 years (from 33-78 years old) who underwent transpedicular endoscopic retrieval of an extruded lumbar disk between 2012 and 2015 is presented. Two patients required revision to transforaminal access, 1 at the same sitting and the other 4 weeks later. The mean visual analog scale score for radicular pain improved from an average pain score before surgery of 8.1-1.7 one year after surgery. No pedicle fractures were encountered., Conclusions: Transpedicular endoscopic access to highly migrated lumbar herniated disk extrusions is presented as a unique minimally invasive approach to extruded lumbar herniated disks, especially at L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Kyphoplasty is a minimally invasive spine surgical procedure performed to stabilize and treat the pain caused by a spine compression fracture. Complications are rare with kyphoplasty and include cement extrusion into the vertebral canal leading to spinal cord or nerve root compression. Herein, the authors present a case of a 72-year-old woman who presented with symptoms of a right L2 radiculopathy after a kyphoplasty procedure. Computed tomography imaging showed leakage of the kyphoplasty cement into the neural foramen above and medial to the right L2 pedicle. A transforaminal endoscopic surgical approach was used to remove the cement and decompress the L2 nerve. The patient's postoperative clinical course was uneventful. Clinicians should be aware that for the treatment of complications to vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty procedures, minimally invasive transforaminal endoscopic surgery is one option to avoid the destabilizing effects of laminectomy and facetectomy., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Isthmic spondylolisthesis due to pars defects resulting from trauma or spondylolysis is not uncommon. Symptomatic patients with such pars defects are traditionally treated with a variety of fusion surgeries. The authors present a unique case in which such a patient was successfully treated with endoscopic discectomy without iatrogenic destabilization. A 31-year-old man presented with a history of left radicular leg pain along the distribution of the sciatic nerve. He had a disc herniation at L5/S1 and bilateral pars defects with a Grade I spondylolisthesis. Dynamic radiographic studies did not show significant movement of L-5 over S-1. The patient did not desire to have a fusion. After induction of local anesthesia, the patient underwent an awake transforaminal endoscopic discectomy via the extraforaminal approach, with decompression of the L-5 and S-1 nerve roots. His preoperative pain resolved immediately, and he was discharged home the same day. His preoperative Oswestry Disability Index score was 74, and postoperatively it was noted to be 8. At 2-year follow-up he continued to be symptom free, and no radiographic progression of the listhesis was noted. In this case preservation of stabilizing structures, including the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments and the facet capsule, may have reduced the likelihood of iatrogenic instability while at the same time achieving symptom control. This may be a reasonable option for select patient symptoms confined to lumbosacral radiculopathy.

Approximately half a million spinal fusion procedures are performed annually in the US. It is estimated that up to one-third of arthrodesis constructs require revision surgeries. In this study the authors present endoscopic treatment strategies targeting 3 types of complications following arthrodesis surgery: 1) adjacent-level foraminal stenosis; 2) foraminal stenosis at an arthrodesis segment; and 3) stenosis caused by a displaced interbody cage. A retrospective chart review of 11 patients with a mean age of 68 ± 15 years was performed (continuous variables are shown as the mean ± SEM). All patients had a history of lumbar arthrodesis surgery and suffered from unilateral radiculopathy. Endoscopic revision surgeries were done as outpatient procedures, and there were no intraoperative or perioperative complications. The cohort included 3 patients with foraminal stenosis at the level of previous arthrodesis. They presented with unilateral radicular leg pain (visual analog scale [VAS] score: 7.3 ± 2.1) and were severely disabled, as evidenced by an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) of 46 ± 4.9. Transforaminal endoscopic foraminotomies were performed, and at a mean follow-up time of 9.0 ± 2.5 months VAS was reduced by an average of 6.3. The cohort also includes 7 patients suffering unilateral radiculopathy due to adjacent-level foraminal stenosis. Preoperative VAS for leg pain of the symptomatic side was 6.0 ± 1.6, VAS for back pain was 5.2 ± 1.7, and ODI was 40 ± 6.33. Endoscopic decompression led to reduction of the ipsilateral leg VAS score by an average of 5, resulting in leg pain of 1 ± 0.5 at an average of 8 months of follow-up. The severity of back pain remained stable (VAS 4.2 ± 1.4). Two of these patients required revision surgery for recurrent symptoms. Finally, this study includes 1 patient who presented with weakness and pain due to retropulsion of an L5/S1 interbody spacer. The patient underwent an endoscopic interlaminar approach with partial resection of the interbody cage, which resulted in complete resolution of her radicular symptoms. Endoscopic surgery may be a useful adjunct for management of certain arthrodesis-related complications. Endoscopic foraminal decompression of previously fused segments and resection of displaced interbody cages appears to have excellent outcomes, whereas decompression of adjacent segments remains challenging and requires further investigation.

OBJECTIVE Asymmetrical degeneration of the disc is one of the most common causes of primary degenerative scoliosis in adults. Coronal deformity is usually less symptomatic than a sagittal deformity because there is less expenditure of energy and hence less effort to maintain upright posture. However, nerve root compression at the fractional curve or at the concave side of the main curve can give rise to debilitating radiculopathy. METHODS This study was a retrospective analysis of 16 patients with coronal deformity of between 10° and 20°. All patients underwent endoscopic foraminal decompression surgery. The pre- and postoperative Cobb angle, visual analog scale (VAS), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Oswestry Disability Index scores were measured. RESULTS The average age of the patients was 70.0 ± 15.5 years (mean ± SD, range 61-86 years), with a mean followup of 7.5 ± 5.3 months (range 2-14 months). The average coronal deformity was 16.8° ± 4.7° (range 10°-41°). In 8 patients the symptomatic foraminal stenosis was at the level of the fractional curve, and in the remaining patients it was at the concave side of the main curve. One of the patients included in the current cohort had to undergo a repeat operation within 1 week for another disc herniation at the adjacent level. One patient had CSF leakage, which was repaired intraoperatively, and no further complications were noted. On average, preoperative VAS and SF-36 scores showed a tendency for improvement, whereas a dramatic reduction of VAS, by 65% (p = 0.003), was observed in radicular leg pain. CONCLUSIONS Patients with mild to moderate spinal deformity are often compensated and have tolerable levels of back pain. However, unilateral radicular pain resulting from foraminal stenosis can be debilitating. In select cases, an endoscopic discectomy or foraminotomy enables the surgeon to decompress the symptomatic foramen with preservation of essential biomechanical structures, delaying the need for a major deformity correction surgery.

Background Context: The classic surgical treatment of spinal stenosis involves bilateral dissection of paraspinal muscles to expose all the involved levels, wide laminectomy, and medial facetectomy and foraminotomy. The surgical morbidity of the procedure is further magnified by being more common in elderly with associated medical comorbidities and being usually global involving multiple levels. To address this problem, several less invasive techniques have been introduced over the past decade including the microendoscopic decompression., Purpose: The aim was to describe and evaluate a new endoscopic technique for lumbar spinal canal decompression named irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy., Study Design: This was a technical report., Patient Sample: One hundred four consecutive patients suffering from neurogenic claudication and resistant to 3 months of conservative management were included in the study. Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis and degenerative scoliosis were not considered a contraindication. Patients with segmental instability and predominant low back pain were excluded., Outcome Measures: Primary outcome measures included the final functional outcome using modified Macnab criteria and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). In addition, the operative time and complication rate have been evaluated. Secondary outcome measures included the evaluation of the early postoperative course using visual analog scale for postoperative incisional pain, time for ambulation, and length of hospital stay., Methods: Two 0.5-cm portals were used, one for the endoscope and the other for instruments. For every additional level, one portal is added. The endoscope and instruments are directly placed over the surface of lamina without any dissection, and saline under pump pressure is used to open a potential working space. Unilateral laminotomy/laminectomy is performed according to the severity of stenosis, followed by bilateral decompression beneath the midline structures., Results: Mean follow-up period was 28 months. The final outcome was excellent in 63%, good in 24%, fair in 9%, and poor in 4%. The preoperative ODI dropped from a mean of 64.2±10.0 to 23.1±20.8 postoperatively. Complications were limited to six cases of dural tear, which required no open conversion., Conclusions: Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy allows the surgeon to safely perform effective central and foraminal decompression resulting in satisfactory midterm clinical results. Substituting long surgical incisions with 0.5-cm stabs and direct placement of instruments without dissection or dilatation could result in an improved postoperative course, shortened time for hospitalization, and reduced infection rate. However, still multicenter studies and randomized trials are needed before making final conclusions., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives were pathological confirmation, spinal cord decompression, and complete tumor removal; all were met. The patient was satisfied with her dramatically improved clinical symptoms. UBE may be an alternative surgical treatment option for benign IDEM tumors presenting with symptomatic, especially the non-giant lateral and posterior tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endoscopic spine surgery represents a significant advancement in the minimally invasive treatment of spinal disorders, promising reduced surgical invasiveness while aiming to maintain or improve clinical outcomes. This study undertakes a comprehensive review of the literature on endoscopic spine surgery, with a particular focus on cataloging and analyzing the range of complications, from common postoperative issues to more severe, casuistic outcomes like dural tears and nerve damage. Methods: Our methodology encompassed a detailed review of meta-analyses, prospective randomized trials, cohort studies, and case reports to capture a broad spectrum of complications associated with endoscopic spine techniques. The emphasis was on identifying both the frequency and severity of these complications to understand better the procedural risks. Results: The findings suggest that endoscopic spine surgery generally exhibits a lower complication rate compared to traditional surgical approaches. Nonetheless, the identification of specific, rare complications peculiar to endoscopic methods underscores the critical need for surgeons' advanced skills, continuous learning, and awareness of potential risks. Conclusions: Recognizing and preparing for the potential complications associated with the rapid adoption of endoscopic techniques is paramount to ensuring patient safety and improving surgical outcomes in minimally invasive spine surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this paper is to review the data supporting current endoscopic surgical techniques for the spine and the potential challenges and future of the field. The origins of endoscopic spine surgery can be traced back many decades, with many important innovations throughout its development. It can be applied to all levels of the spine, with many robust trials supporting its clinical outcomes. Continued clinical research is needed to explore its expanding indications. Although the limitations of starting an endoscopic program can be justified by its cost effectiveness and positive societal impact, challenges facing its widespread adoption are still present. As more residency and fellowship programs include endoscopy as part of their spine training, it will become more prevalent in hospitals in the United States. Technological advancements in spine surgery will further propel and enhance endoscopic techniques as they become an integral part of a spine surgeon's repertoire. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Biportal spinal endoscopy is increasingly utilized for lumbar disc herniations and lumbar stenosis. The objective was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the technique in the outpatient vs inpatient setting. Methods: This is a comparative study of consecutive patients who underwent biportal spinal endoscopy by a single surgeon at a single institution. Demographics, surgical complications, and patient-reported outcomes were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Statistics were calculated among treatment groups using unpaired t test and χ² analysis where appropriate. Statistical significance was determined as P < 0.05. Results: Eighty-four patients were included, 58 (69.0%) as outpatient, 26 (31.0%) as inpatient. Mean follow-up was 7.5 months. Statistically significant differences in age, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and Charleston Comorbidity Index scores were reported between cohorts, with younger and healthier patients undergoing outpatient surgery (P < 0.0001). Outpatients were more likely to have discectomies while inpatients were more likely to have decompressions for stenosis. No significant differences in postoperative complications were found between groups. Both cohorts demonstrated significant improvement in visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg pain scores and Oswestry Disability Index scores (P < 0.001). Outpatients had significantly lower postoperative VAS back pain (P = 0.001) and Oswestry Disability Index scores (P = 0.004) at 5-8 weeks compared with inpatients, but there was no significant difference for VAS leg pain scores at all time points between the cohorts. Conclusions: Early results demonstrate that biportal spinal endoscopy can safely and effectively be performed in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Clinical Relevance: Outpatient biportal spinal endoscopy can be performed successfully in well selected patients, which may reduce the financial burden of spine surgery to the U.S. healthcare system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous studies on thoracolumbar fractures with neurological symptoms have focused on how to achieve satisfactory fracture reduction, adequate nerve decompression, and stable spinal alignment. With the development of the minimally invasive spine surgery technique, achieving satisfactory treatment results and reducing iatrogenic trauma at the same time has become a new goal of spinal surgery. This research used percutaneous transpedicular screw distraction to partially reduce the fractured vertebrae, followed by completing nerve decompression and reducing residual displacement bone fragments with the assistance of the unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique to achieve full protection of bone-ligament tissue and obtain good clinical efficacy. Methods: Guide wires were safely inserted into the fractured vertebra and adjacent upper and lower vertebra under the surveillance of anteroposterior and lateral X-ray fluoroscopy. Transpedicular screws were implanted via guide wires on the side with mild neurological deficits or bone fragment compression (the opposite side of the endoscopic operation). A titanium rod was installed and moderately distracted to reduce the fractured vertebra. Then, under the guidance of the endoscopic view, the laminectomy and ligamentum flavum resection were completed according to the position of the protruding bone fragment into the spinal canal, and the compressed dural sac or nerve root was fully exposed and decompressed. An L-shaped replacer was used to reduce residual bone fragments. The ipsilateral transpedicular screws and rod were installed and adjusted to match the contralateral side. The drainage tube was indwelled, and the incision was closed. The preoperative and postoperative images of the patients were evaluated, and the recovery of neurological symptoms was observed. Results: Surgery was successfully completed on all six patients, and no intraoperative conversion to open surgery was performed. Postoperative images showed good reduction of the protruding bone fragment and good placement of all screws. At the last follow-up, the neurological symptoms of all patients returned to normal. Conclusion: The UBE technique combined with percutaneous transpedicular screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with neurological symptoms can effectively achieve the reduction of displaced bone fragments, improve damaged nerve function, stabilize spinal alignment, and protect the integrity of bone-ligament tissue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purposes: To analyze the clinical and radiographic risk factors that might predict incomplete clinical improvement after transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted from 194 consecutive patients who underwent TELD due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Patients with incomplete clinical improvement were defined from patient-reported outcomes of poor improvement in pain or disability after surgery and patient dissatisfaction. Clinical and radiographic characteristics were evaluated to identify predicting factors of poor outcomes. Results: Of 194 patients who underwent TELD procedures, 32 patients (16.5%) had incomplete clinical improvement and 12 patients (6.1%) required revision surgery. The mean ages were 46.4 years and most of the patients suffered from predominant leg pain (48.9%). The most common surgical level was L4–5 (63.9%). Overall, the Oswestry Disability Index (44.3–15), visual analog scores of back pain (4.9–1.8) and leg pain (7.3–1.6) were significantly improved after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that high body mass index, history of previous surgery, preoperative disability, weakness, and disc degeneration were related to incomplete clinical improvement. There were 15 recurrent LDH (7.7%) with a total of 12 revision surgeries (6.2%). Conclusions: We identified independent risk factors associated with incomplete clinical improvement following TELD, including overweight, significant preoperative disability or weakness and history of previous surgery. Advanced age, disc degeneration, vacuum phenomenon, and spondylolisthesis were also possible risk factors. Recognizing these risk factors would help decide whether patients are good candidates for TELD, and optimize the surgical planning preoperatively to achieve good surgical results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) is a minimally invasive surgical technique that offers comparable efficacy and safety with less collateral damage compared to conventional surgery. To achieve clinical success, it is imperative to stay abreast of technological advancements, modern surgical instruments and technique, and updated evidence. Purposes: To provide a comprehensive review and updates of ESS including the nomenclature, technical evolution, bibliometric analysis of evidence, recent changes in the spine communities, the prevailing of biportal endoscopy, and the future of endoscopic spine surgery. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on ESS for the mentioned topics from January 1989 to November 2022. Three major electronic databases were searched, including MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase. Covidence Systematic Review was used to organize the eligible records. Two independent reviewers screened the articles for relevance. Results: In total, 312 articles were finally included for review. We found various use of nomenclatures in the field of ESS publication. To address this issue, we proposed the use of distinct terms to describe the biportal and uniportal techniques, as well as their specific approaches. In the realm of technical advancement, ESS has rapidly evolved from addressing disc herniation and spinal stenosis to encompassing endoscopic fusion, along with technological innovations such as navigation, robotics, and augmented reality. According to bibliometric analysis, China, South Korea, and the USA have accounted for almost three-quarters of total publications. The studies of the biportal endoscopy are becoming increasingly popular in South Korea where the top ten most-cited articles have been published. The biportal endoscopy technique is relatively simple to adopt, as it relies on a more familiar approach, requires less expensive instruments, has a shorter learning curve, and is also well-suited for interbody fusion. The uniportal approach provided the smallest area of soft tissue dissection. While robotics and augmented reality in ESS are not widely embraced, the use of navigation in ESS is expected to become more streamlined, particularly with the emergence of recent electromagnetic-based navigation technologies. Conclusions: In this paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of ESS, as well as an updated summary of current trends in the field, including the biportal and uniportal approaches. Additionally, we summarize the nomenclature used in ESS, present a bibliometric analysis of the field, and discuss future directions for the advancement of the field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective comparative study. Objective: Assessment of difference in clinical and computer tomographic outcomes between the 2 cohorts. Methods: Computer tomographic evaluation by Bridwell's grade, Kim's stage, Kim's subsidence grade and clinical evaluation by VAS, ODI and McNab's criteria on both cohorts. Results: 33 levels of Endo-TLIF and 22 levels of TLIF were included, with a mean follow up of 14.3 (10-24) and 22.9 (13-30) months respectively. Both Endo-TLIF and TLIF achieved significant improvement of pain and ODI at post-operative 4 week, 3 months and at final follow up with VAS 4.39 ± 0.92, 5.27 ± 1.16 and 5.73 ± 1.21in Endo-TLIF and 4.55 ± 1.16, 5.05 ± 1.11 and 5.50 ± 1.20 in TLIF respectively and ODI at post-operative 1 week, 3 months and final follow up were 43.15 ± 6.57, 49.27 ± 8.24 and 51.73 ± 9.09 in Endo-TLIF and 41.73 ± 7.98, 46.18± 8.46 and 49.09 ± 8.98 in TLIF respectively, P < 0.05. Compared to TLIF, Endo-TLIF achieved better VAS with 0.727 ± 0.235 at 3 months and 0.727 ± 0.252 at final follow up and better ODI with 3.88 ± 1.50 at 3months and 3.42 ± 1.63 at final follow up, P < 0.05. At 6 months radiological evaluation comparison of the Endo-TLIF and TLIF showed significant with more favorable fusion rate in Endo-TLIF of −0.61 ± 0.12 at 6 months and −0.49 ± 0.12 at 1 year in Bridwell's grading and 0.70 ± 0.15 at 6 months and 0.56 ± 0.14 at 1 year in Kim's stage.There is less subsidence of 0.606 ± 0.18 at 6 months and −0.561 ± 0.20 at 1 year of Kim's subsidence grade, P < 0.05. Conclusion: Application of single level uniportal endoscopic posterolateral lumbar interbody fusion achieved better clinical outcomes and fusion rate with less subsidence than microscopic minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in mid-term evaluation for our cohorts of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Biomechanical cadaveric study.Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of transforaminal endoscopic approaches with open decompression procedures.Summary Of Background Data: Clinical studies have repeatedly highlighted the benefits of endoscopic decompression, however, the biomechanical effects of endoscopic approaches (with and without injury to the disk) have not been studied up to now.Materials and Methods: Twelve spinal segments originating from four fresh-frozen cadavers were biomechanically tested in a load-controlled endoscopic transforaminal approach study. Segmental range of motion (ROM) after endoscopic approach was compared with segmental ROM after (1) microsurgical decompression with unilateral laminotomy and (2) midline decompression with bilateral laminotomy. In the intact state and after decompression, the segments were loaded in flexion-extension (FE), lateral shear (LS), lateral bending (LB), anterior shear (AS), and axial rotation (AR).Results: Vertebral segment ROM was comparable between the two endoscopic transforaminal approaches. However, there was a-statistically nonsignificant-trend for a larger ROM after accessing via the inside-out technique: FE: +3% versus +7%, P =0.484; LS: +1% versus +12%, P =0.18; LB: +0.6% versus +9%, P =0.18; AS: +2% versus +11%, P =0.31; AR: -4% versus +5%, P =0.18. No significant difference in vertebral segment ROM was seen between the transforaminal endoscopic approaches and open unilateral decompression. Vertebral segment ROM was significantly smaller with the transforaminal endoscopic approaches compared with midline decompression for almost all loading scenarios: FE: +4% versus +17%, P =0.005; AS: +6% versus 21%, P =0.007; AR: 0% versus +24%, P =0.002.Conclusion: The transforaminal endoscopic intracanal technique preserves the native ROM of lumbar vertebral segments and shows a trend toward relative biomechanical superiority over the inside-out technique and open decompression procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Interlaminar endoscopic spine surgery has been introduced and utilized for lumbar lateral recess decompression. We modified this technique and utilized it for bilateral lateral recess stenoses without significant central stenosis. Here we present the surgical details and clinical outcome of ligamentum flavum sparing unilateral laminotomy for bilateral recess decompression (ULBRD). Methods: Prospectively collected registry for full-endoscopic surgeries was reviewed retrospectively. One hundred eighty-two consecutive cases from a single center between September 2015 and March 2021 were reviewed and 57 of them whom underwent ULBRD were enrolled for analysis. Basic patient demographic data, perioperative details, surgeryrelated complications, and clinical outcome were reviewed. The detailed surgical technique is presented as well. Results: Among the 57 patients enrolled, 37 were males while the other 20 were females. The mean age was 58.53 ± 14.51 years, and a bimodal age distribution at the age of mid-fifties and mid-sixties or older was noted. The later age-peak was related to coexistence of degenerative scoliosis. The average operative time per lamina was 70.34 ± 20.51 minutes and mean length of stay was 0.56 ± 0.85 days. Four perioperative complications were reported (7.0%) and the overall reoperation rate at the index level within 1 year was 8.8%. The preoperative back/leg visual analogue scale scores and functional outcome scales including EuroQol-5 dimension questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index presented significant improvement immediately after surgery and were maintained until final follow-up. Conclusion: ULBRD for bilateral lateral recess stenoses without significant central stenosis resulted in good clinical outcomes with acceptably low perioperative complications rates. Sufficient decompression was achieved with the central ligamentum flavum being preserved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study design: Prospective cohort study Purpose: The objective is to compare post-operative wound pain in patients treated by endoscopic surgery between interlaminar and transforaminal approach at lumbar region. Overview of literature: There are two common approaches for endoscopic lumbar spine surgery, interlaminar and transforaminal approach. The wound size of these two approaches is about the same. However, post-operative wound pain may differ according to the entrance area. Methods: We conducted a prospectively cohort study including all patients underwent full endoscopic lumbar spine surgery by single surgeon between January 2016 to October 2019. Wound pain using visual analog scale (VAS) at post-operative day 1 and day 14 were collected. VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), modified McNab criteria and complications were also collected. Results: There were 313 patients included in the study. There was no significant difference in VAS wound pain between interlaminar and transforaminal group. Interestingly, subgroup analysis in interlaminar group found statistically significant higher VAS for wound pain at post-operative day 1 when significant bone resection was done by power burr. VAS back-leg pain and ODI have improved significantly between pre-operative and last follow up in both approaches. Conclusions: Wound pain from endoscopic spine surgery is minimal. This study found no difference in wound pain between endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal approach. Both approaches show favorable clinical outcomes with few serious complications rate. Further study with long term follow up is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Post lumbar laminotomy anatomical changes can be disorienting to uniportal spinal endoscopist. This which led to many open conversionconversion to open surgery to verify landmarks. Isthmus tends not to be violated inis usually preserved in laminotomy and it can be used as a useful landmark for endoscopic fusion surgery. Unlike tubular microscopic surgery, endoscope possess more mobility; conveniently navigating through the identifiable anatomical landmarks in revision surgery with minimal fluroscopy. Uniportal Endoscopic Lateral to Medial Direction Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion, is a useful revision surgery technique with isthmus as reference point, it had not been described in literature. Case Presentation A 66 years old lady with two previous lumbar decompressive surgery to left L4/5 presented with neurogenic claudication and instability. She was diagnosis was to have L4/5 post-surgical spondylolisthesis with stenosis. She Informed consent was obtained consented for left L4/5 revision uniportal endoscopic lateral to medial direction transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, Endo (LM)-TLIF. Procedure started with drilling isthmus with from lateral to medial direction using exploratory bone drilling dissection technique to decompress and explore residual bony anatomical landmark. With proper definition of anatomical margins of intervertebral disc space, endoscopic guided discectomy, end plate preparation, cage and percutaneous pedicle screws insertion were done with aid of fluoroscopy and endoscopy to perform spinal fusion. Patient did well post operatively without any intraoperative complication.Conclusion Endo (LM)-TLIF is a viable, safe and efficacious method to explore a potentially challenging post-surgical anatomy around spinal canal in revision lumbar fusion

Spinal endoscopy has revolutionized the way spine surgeons deliver minimally invasive care for appropriately selected patients. The evolution of endoscopy has been tumultuous since its beginnings as a "blind" percutaneous procedure to access the disk until the present state, in which complex decompressions and even fusions can be accomplished through subcentimeter incisions. Engineering has played a crucial role in this evolution with advances in optics, illumination, and instrumentation that have allowed surgeons to work safely and efficiently in smaller and smaller corridors. Finally, the adaptation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols have complemented the benefits offered by spinal endoscopy to help patients return to the quality of life they seek through surgical intervention. In this article, we explore foundational elements of spinal endoscopy and look ahead to the future of this maturing field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The advent of any new technology or technique is fraught with challenges in the early stages of development and adoption. This situation is no different for spinal endoscopy, which has been continuously developing for decades and has only recently gained significant traction in North America. Patient selection can be challenging for even expert endoscopic surgeons, given the limited abilities of current technology for patients with multilevel disease. Anatomic limitations, such as iliac crest location and small foraminal dimensions, can restrict application of the transforaminal approach, considered the "workhorse" of endoscopic techniques. A paucity of dedicated training opportunities has led many to become late adopters or preclude exposure entirely, limiting the next generation of surgeons and expansion of the field. Finally, economic constraints, including capital expenses and issues with insurance reimbursement, have generated difficulties to widespread acquisition. Nonetheless, the future is bright for spinal endoscopy, with potential solutions to these issues already generating progress. In the present report, we have summarized these challenges and discussed some of the current steps underway to help alleviate their impact. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]