Search

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was first conceptually described almost 30 years ago in Japan and is now widely practiced throughout East Asia. ESD expands the boundaries of endoscopic resection (ER) by allowing en bloc resection of large early neoplastic lesions within the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). This offers advantages over other ER techniques by facilitating definitive histological staging and curative treatment of early cancer in selected cases. Indeed, the experience of ESD in Eastern countries is significant, and excellent outcomes from high‐volume centers are reported. The potential benefits of ESD are recognized by Western endoscopists, but its adoption has been limited. A number of factors contribute to this, including epidemiological differences in GIT neoplasia between Western and Eastern populations and limitations in training opportunities. In this review, we discuss the role of ESD, its current status and the future in Western endoscopic practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced endoscopic procedure to resect early gastrointestinal neoplasm. It is technically more difficult and risky when used to treat early esophageal tumors. We report our experiences related to performing ESD for early esophageal neoplasia. The efficacy, complications, and outcome were also analyzed. Methods: From December 2007 to April 2010, 22 patients with documented early esophageal neoplasm underwent ESD. All patients completed a meticulous endoscopic examination using conventional endoscopy followed by narrow-band imaging. Lugol’s staining was performed to identify the margin of the suspicious lesion. Insulation-tipped diathermic knife 2 was used for ESD. Results: A total of 26 neoplastic lesions (including 13 tumors with high-grade dysplasia, 12 tumors with squamous cell carcinoma, and one tumor with adenocarcinoma) in 22 patients were enrolled. All patients were men. The mean age was 47.6 ± 8.6 years (range, 30–68 years). The mean size of tumors was 33.7 ± 21.7 mm (range, 8–80 mm). ESD was performed for 24 lesions in 20 patients. The mean size of resected specimens was 43.1 ± 19.2 mm (range, 15–90 mm). The mean operation time was 92.7 ± 69 minutes (range, 30–310 minutes). There were three ESD-related complications, including one with delayed bleeding, one with subcutaneous emphysema, and one with perforation. Two patients received additional operations after ESD due to deep submucosal invasion by cancer. Three lesions in two patients (12.5%) developed post-ESD esophageal stricture that needed repeated endoscopic bougination. There was no procedure-related mortality. No local recurrence was found during the follow-up period. Conclusion: ESD is a promising local curative treatment option for early esophageal neoplasia in Taiwan. However, this procedure may result in complications that are worth noting, especially post-ESD esophageal stricture. Education regarding this procedure and more hands-on training will facilitate endoscopists to improve the outcomes of patients undergoing this procedure.

Background and Aims: Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has grown popular in resecting lesions in the stomach, the application of ESD to the esophagus has been limited by greater technical difficulty. An increasing number of series have recently reported the application of ESD to esophageal lesions. The aim of the present systemic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESD for esophageal lesions. Methods: Comprehensive literature searches (1999-2012) were performed on studies that reported ESD for the removal of esophageal neoplasia. Primary outcome measures were pooled estimates of complete resection rate and en bloc resection rate. Secondary outcome measures were pooled estimates of complication rates. Results: A total of 15 studies provided data on 776 ESD-treated lesions. The pooled estimate of complete resection rate was 89.4 % (95 % CI 86.2-91.9 %). The pooled estimate of en bloc resection was 95.1 % (95 % CI 92.6-96.8 %). The pooled estimates of complications of ESD such as bleeding, perforation, and stenosis were 2.1, 5.0, and 11.6 %, respectively. Conclusions: ESD appeared to be an extremely effective technique to achieve complete resection of esophageal neoplasia. The very low rate of complications also shows the potential safety of this approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Purpose: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced endoscopic procedure to resect early gastrointestinal neoplasm. It is technically more difficult and risky when used to treat early esophageal tumors. We report our experiences related to performing ESD for early esophageal neoplasia. The efficacy, complications, and outcome were also analyzed. Methods: From December 2007 to April 2010, 22 patients with documented early esophageal neoplasm underwent ESD. All patients completed a meticulous endoscopic examination using conventional endoscopy followed by narrow-band imaging. Lugol’s staining was performed to identify the margin of the suspicious lesion. Insulation-tipped diathermic knife 2 was used for ESD. Results: A total of 26 neoplastic lesions (including 13 tumors with high-grade dysplasia, 12 tumors with squamous cell carcinoma, and one tumor with adenocarcinoma) in 22 patients were enrolled. All patients were men. The mean age was 47.6 ± 8.6 years (range, 30–68 years). The mean size of tumors was 33.7 ± 21.7 mm (range, 8–80 mm). ESD was performed for 24 lesions in 20 patients. The mean size of resected specimens was 43.1 ± 19.2 mm (range, 15–90 mm). The mean operation time was 92.7 ± 69minutes (range, 30–310 minutes). There were three ESD-related complications, including one with delayed bleeding, one with subcutaneous emphysema, and one with perforation. Two patients received additional operations after ESD due to deep submucosal invasion by cancer. Three lesions in two patients (12.5%) developed post-ESD esophageal stricture that needed repeated endoscopic bougination. There was no procedure-related mortality. No local recurrence was found during the follow-up period. Conclusion: ESD is a promising local curative treatment option for early esophageal neoplasia in Taiwan. However, this procedure may result in complications that are worth noting, especially post-ESD esophageal stricture. Education regarding this procedure and more hands-on training will facilitate endoscopists to improve the outcomes of patients undergoing this procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal neoplasias have not been adequately investigated in elderly patients. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ESD for esophageal neoplasias in elderly patients. Methods: Fifty-three superficial esophageal neoplasias treated with ESD using a combination of small-caliber-tip transparent hood and flex knife from May 2006 to June 2009 were divided into elderly group (aged 70 years or older: 25 lesions in 23 patients) and nonelderly group (younger than aged 70 years: 28 lesions in 25 patients). Therapeutic efficacy, complications, and follow-up results were evaluated retrospectively. Results: The history of cerebral infarction or cardiopulmonary disease and the usage of antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants were significantly higher in elderly group ( p 0.0050 and p 0.0013, respectively). Median procedural times in the elderly group and the nonelderly group were 93 ± 53 (range, 42–235) min and 95 ± 55 (range, 40–230) min ( p 0.73), respectively. Median sizes of the neoplasias and the resected specimens were 14 ± 11 (range, 5–45) mm and 15 ± 17 (range, 5–83) mm ( p 0.56), and 35 ± 12 (range, 18–60) mm and 38 ± 17 (range, 18–90) mm ( p 0.38), respectively. En bloc resection rate was 100% in each group. Body temperature and white blood cell counts of the next day after ESD were significantly higher in the nonelderly group than in the elderly group ( p 0.0087 and p 0.0043, respectively). There were no complications, such as postoperative bleeding or perforation, in each group. The median follow-up period of 23 ± 10 (range, 4–35) months in the elderly group revealed no local or distant metastasis. Conclusions: ESD with a combination of small-caliber-tip transparent hood and flex knife is a safe and effective treatment for superficial esophageal neoplasia in elderly and nonelderly patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Superficial esophageal neoplasias resected in piecemeal manner with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) sometimes recur locally, and additional treatments need to be developed. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal neoplasias are not sufficiently demonstrated, so we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESD for superficial esophageal neoplasias. Thirty-seven superficial esophageal neoplasias consisted of 34 squamous cell neoplasias and 3 columnar neoplasias in 35 patients were treated with ESD from May 2006 to July 2008. Patients were regularly followed up with endoscopy every 6 months, and with echoendoscope and computed tomography every year. Therapeutic efficacy, complications, and follow-up results were evaluated. The mean size of the resected neoplasias and that of the resected specimens were 22 mm (range 10–83 mm) and 41 mm (range 18–90 mm), respectively. The mean duration of the ESD procedures was 117 min (range 40–235 min). The overall rates of en bloc resection and of free margin resection were 100% (37/37) and 95% (35/37), respectively. The mean follow-up period of 19 months (range 7–32 months) revealed no local or distant recurrence. There were no complications such as bleeding or perforation in any case. In all nine cases, the strictures were successfully managed with prophylactic endoscopic balloon dilation. ESD with a combination of small-caliber-tip transparent hood and flex knife is a safe endoscopic treatment for superficial esophageal neoplasias and enables large en bloc resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been established to be more efficacious in the treatment of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasia than the piecemeal resection, its use is still limited due to the concern about serious adverse events particularly in the west. Newer ESD knives have been developed that have been said to be safer than the first-generation devices. We aimed to report a Western single center experience regarding the initial safety and performance of ESD for superficial esophageal neoplasia treated with the Clutch Cutter (DP2618DT; Fujifilm Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Our main outcome was safety in terms of bleeding or perforation. Secondary outcomes included en bloc resection and the R0 resection. Fourteen patients with superficial esophageal neoplasia underwent 15 ESDs using the Clutch Cutter. The mean age was 65 ± 16.7 years and 10 (71.4%) males. Eight (57%) patients had esophageal adenocarcinoma, 3 (21.4%) had high-grade dysplasia, 1 (7%) had nodular low-grade dysplasia, and 2 (14.3%) had squamous cell carcinoma. Mild anticipated intraprocedural bleeding was present with most procedures. However, no significant postoperative bleeding or perforation was encountered. One patient had mild chest pain postprocedure. En bloc resection was achieved in all lesions 100%. Histological R0 was achieved in 5/12 lesions (41.6%). The mean length of the resected area was 24.8 ± 13 mm (IQR: 17–30 mm). All patients were safely discharged home after overnight observation. In conclusion, this is the largest series of esophageal ESD using the multimodal Clutch Cutter in the United States; we found that the device effectively achieved en bloc resection of superficial esophageal neoplasia without significant adverse events. The use of the Clutch Cutter should be considered as one option to minimize adverse events during ESD in the Western population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]