Search

Background: Assessing the extent of disease in newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PC) patients is crucial for tailoring an appropriate treatment approach. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–targeted positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) reportedly has greater accuracy than conventional imaging for staging PC. As with any imaging modality, pitfalls and nonspecific findings do occur. The PSMA reporting and data system (PSMA-RADS) version 1.0 offers structured interpretation of PSMA-targeted studies and classifies lesions by likelihood of clinical significance. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical significance of equivocal bone findings on staging PSMA-targeted imaging, as defined by PSMA-RADS version 1.0, in the preoperative setting. Fifteen of 406 consecutive patients staged by PET/CT prior to radical prostatectomy had equivocal bone lesions. The scans were retrospectively scored with the PSMA-RADS version 1.0 system, blinded to disease course and follow-up data. Postoperative persistence of prostate-specific antigen levels supported by imaging and histological findings was used as the reference standard for the true significance of equivocal imaging findings. Results: Thirteen of the 15 patients had an overall PSMA-RADS score of 3B, of whom only two had true metastatic disease. The remaining patients had scores of 4 (n = 1) or 5 (n = 1), all confirmed as true positive prostate-related malignant lesions. A per-lesion analysis identified 29 bone lesions, of which 27 were scored PSMA-RADS 3B, and only three of them were true metastases. Thus, debatable lesions proved to have no clinical significance in 84.6% of cases, and only 11% of equivocal PSMA-RADS 3B bone lesions were true positive. Conclusions: In intermediate and high-risk patients staged prior to radical prostatectomy, the majority of PSMA-RADS 3B lesions are of no clinical relevance. Bone lesions judged as being highly suspicious for metastases (PSMA-RADS 4/5) were all validated as true positives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Concurrent systematic biopsies during image-guided targeted biopsies of the prostate were found to improve the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC). However, these biopsies do not routinely include anterior or apical sampling. We aimed to evaluate the significance of anterior and apical samplings during combined biopsies.Methods: After obtaining institutional review board approval we identified 303 consecutive patients who underwent transperineal combined biopsies of the prostate between 2017-2020. Systematic biopsies were obtained from the peripheral zone, anterior zone, and apex. Study outcomes included CSPC and any cancer on anterior or apical biopsies. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between pre-biopsy characteristics and study outcomes.Results: Median prostatic-specific-antigen value was 6.8 ng/dL. Most patients had stage T1c disease (77%). Overall, combined biopsies detected CSPC in 87 patients (29%). Any cancer and CSPC in the anterior zone were found in 54 (18%) and 19 (6%) patients, respectively. Any cancer and CSPC in the apex were found in 54 (18%) and 16 (5%) patients, respectively. Anterior/apical samplings upgraded the pathological result in 19 patients (6%). Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that PI-RADS 5 lesions predicted the presence of CSPC in both the anterior zone (OR = 8, 95%CI = 3-22, P <0.001) and apex (OR = 4, 95%CI = 1-10, P = 0.01).Conclusions: Avoiding anterior and apical samplings during prostate biopsy does not result in substantial under-diagnosis of significant cancer. However, these areas are easily accessible using the transperineal approach and should be sampled in selected patients, particularly those with PI-RADS 5 lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Image guided biopsies are an integral part of prostate cancer evaluation. The effect of delaying biopsies of suspicious prostate mpMRI lesions is uncertain and clinically relevant during the COVID-19 crisis. We evaluated the association between biopsy delay time and pathologic findings on subsequent prostate biopsy.Materials and Methods: After obtaining IRB approval we reviewed the medical records of 214 patients who underwent image-guided transperineal fusion biopsy of the prostate biopsy between 2017 and 2019. Study outcomes included clinically significant (ISUP grade group ≥2) and any prostate cancer on biopsy. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between biopsy delay time and outcomes while adjusting for known predictors of cancer on biopsy.Results: The study cohort included 195 men with a median age of 68. Median delay between mpMRI and biopsy was 5 months, and 90% of patients had a ≤8 months delay. A significant association was found between PI-RADS 5 lesions and no previous biopsies and shorter delay time. Delay time was not associated with clinically significant or any cancer on biopsy. A higher risk of significant cancer was associated with older age (P = 0.008), higher PSA (0.003), smaller prostate volume (<0.001), no previous biopsy (0.012) and PI-RADS 5 lesions (0.015).Conclusions: Our findings suggest that under current practice, where men with PI-RADS 5 lesions and no previous biopsies undergo earlier evaluation, a delay of up to 8 months between imaging and biopsy does not affect biopsy findings. In the current COVID-19 crisis, selectively delaying image-guided prostate biopsies is unlikely to result in a higher rate of significant cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]