Search

Objective Pelvic floor pain, abdominal wall pain, and central nervous system pain amplification can be contributing factors in chronic pelvic pain (CPP), however; limited research has investigated the association of pelvic floor, abdominal, and uterine tenderness with central nervous system pain amplification. We assessed whether pressure pain thresholds on the non-dominant thumbnail, a marker of central nervous system pain amplification, were associated with pelvic floor, abdominal, and uterine tenderness among women with endometriosis or CPP. Study design We conducted a cross-sectional study among 88 females with endometriosis and/or CPP. Abdominal (6 locations), pelvic floor (6 locations) and uterine (1 location) tenderness were assessed via a standardized physical exam. Participants reported their pain levels (0–10 scale) with application of 2 kg of pressure at each area, with a pain rating of ≥4 on the 0–10 scale considered moderate to severe pain. Pain sensitivity was measured on the non-dominant thumbnail by applying discrete pressure stimuli using a previously validated protocol. Results Overall, 50% (44/88), 42% (37/88), and 58% (51/88) of participants reported high pelvic floor, abdominal, and uterine tenderness, respectively. Pressure intensities needed to elicit ‘faint’ and ‘mild’ pain were lower for participants with high vs. low pelvic floor tenderness (median intensity for ‘faint’ pain = 0.50 kgf/cm2(min–max:0.25–3.25) vs. 1.06(0.25–3.00), p-value = 0.006; median intensity for ‘mild’ pain = 2.00(0.63–4.88) vs. 2.63(0.75–6.00), p-value = 0.03). No association was observed between pressure pain sensitivity and abdominal or uterine tenderness (p > 0.11). Participants with endometriosis without pain were less likely to have high pelvic floor (22.2%), abdominal (11.1%), and uterine (25.9%) tenderness compared to participants with endometriosis with pain (63.0%, 50%, 65.2%, respectively) and participants with chronic pelvic pain (60%, 73.3%, 93.3%, respectively). Conclusions These results suggest that high pelvic floor tenderness among women with endometriosis/CPP may be a marker of heightened pain sensitivity suggestive of central nervous system pain amplification and may impact treatment response. Future research should examine whether this clinical phenotype predicts response to medical and behavioral treatments (e.g, anti-convulsants, behavioral therapy, Physical Therapy).

STUDY QUESTION How accurately do women report a diagnosis of endometriosis on self-administered questionnaires? SUMMARY ANSWER Based on the analysis of four international cohorts, women self-report endometriosis fairly accurately with a > 70% confirmation for clinical and surgical records. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The study of complex diseases requires large, diverse population-based samples, and endometriosis is no exception. Due to the difficulty of obtaining medical records for a condition that may have been diagnosed years earlier and for which there is no standardized documentation, reliance on self-report is necessary. Only a few studies have assessed the validity of self-reported endometriosis compared with medical records, with the observed confirmation ranging from 32% to 89%. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We compared questionnaire-reported endometriosis with medical record notation among participants from the Black Women’s Health Study (BWHS; 1995-2013), Etude Epidémiologique auprès de femmes de la Mutuelle Générale de l’Education Nationale (E3N; 1990-2006), Growing Up Today Study (GUTS; 2005–2016), and Nurses’ Health Study II (NHSII; 1989–1993 first wave, 1995–2007 second wave). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Participants who had reported endometriosis on self-administered questionnaires gave permission to procure and review their clinical, surgical, and pathology medical records, yielding records for 827 women: 225 (BWHS), 168 (E3N), 85 (GUTS), 132 (NHSII first wave), and 217 (NHSII second wave). We abstracted diagnosis confirmation as well as American Fertility Society (AFS) or revised American Society of Reproductive Medicine (rASRM) stage and visualized macro-presentation (e.g. superficial peritoneal, deep endometriosis, endometrioma). For each cohort, we calculated clinical reference to endometriosis, and surgical- and pathologic-confirmation proportions. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Confirmation was high—84% overall when combining clinical, surgical, and pathology records (ranging from 72% for BWHS to 95% for GUTS), suggesting that women accurately report if they are told by a physician that they have endometriosis. Among women with self-reported laparoscopic confirmation of their endometriosis diagnosis, confirmation of medical records was extremely high (97% overall, ranging from 95% for NHSII second wave to 100% for NHSII first wave). Importantly, only 42% of medical records included pathology reports, among which histologic confirmation ranged from 76% (GUTS) to 100% (NHSII first wave). Documentation of visualized endometriosis presentation was often absent, and details recorded were inconsistent. AFS or rASRM stage was documented in 44% of NHSII first wave, 13% of NHSII second wave, and 24% of GUTS surgical records. The presence/absence of deep endometriosis was rarely noted in the medical records. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Medical record abstraction was conducted separately by cohort-specific investigators, potentially introducing misclassification due to variation in abstraction protocols and interpretation. Additionally, information on the presence/absence of AFS/rASRM stage, deep endometriosis, and histologic findings were not available for all four cohort studies. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Variation in access to care and differences in disease phenotypes and risk factor distributions among patients with endometriosis necessitates the use of large, diverse population samples to subdivide patients for risk factor, treatment response and discovery of long-term outcomes. Women self-report endometriosis with reasonable accuracy (>70%) and with exceptional accuracy when women are restricted to those who report that their endometriosis had been confirmed by laparoscopic surgery (>94%). Thus, relying on self-reported endometriosis in order to use larger sample sizes of patients with endometriosis appears to be valid, particularly when self-report of laparoscopic confirmation is used as the case definition. However, the paucity of data on histologic findings, AFS/rASRM stage, and endometriosis phenotypic characteristics suggests that a universal requirement for harmonized clinical and surgical data documentation is needed if we hope to obtain the relevant details for subgrouping patients with endometriosis. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This project was supported by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development grants HD48544, HD52473, HD57210, and HD94842, National Cancer Institute grants CA50385, R01CA058420, UM1CA164974, and U01CA176726, and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant U01HL154386. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. AS, SM, and KT were additionally supported by the J. Willard and Alice S. Marriott Foundation. MK was supported by a Marie Curie International Outgoing Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme (#PIOF-GA-2011-302078) and is grateful to the Philippe Foundation and the Bettencourt-Schueller Foundation for their financial support. Funders had no role in the study design, conduct of the study or data analysis, writing of the report, or decision to submit the article for publication. LA Wise has served as a fibroid consultant for AbbVie, Inc for the last three years and has received in-kind donations (e.g. home pregnancy tests) from Swiss Precision Diagnostics, Sandstone Diagnostics, Kindara.com, and FertilityFriend.com for the PRESTO cohort. SA Missmer serves as an advisory board member for AbbVie and a single working group service for Roche; neither are related to this study. No other authors have a conflict of interest to report. Funders had no role in the study design, conduct of the study or data analysis, writing of the report, or decision to submit the article for publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Endometriosis affects reproductive-aged females and varies considerably in terms of symptom presentation, morphologic features, and treatment response. Most studies investigating symptom recurrence after an endometriosis-related surgery have been conducted among adults. The Endometriosis pain QUality aftEr Surgical Treatment (EndoQUEST) Study was established to assess characteristics and biomarkers that are associated with pain remediation and improved quality of life after an endometriosis-related surgery among adolescents and young adults. This paper describes the EndoQUEST methodology, summarizes baseline descriptive factors, and compares characteristics by participant retention status. We enrolled 100 surgically-confirmed endometriosis participants aged 12–23 years who provided questionnaire data on reproductive and behavioral factors, pain characteristics and quality of life at three time points; before surgery, 6 weeks to 26 weeks after surgery, and 1 year after surgery. Among these 100 participants, 88 provided blood and/or saliva at all three time points, while 12 provided blood and/or saliva samples only before surgery and 6 to 26 weeks after surgery. There was little evidence of lost to follow-up at 1 year after surgery due to pain symptoms, as pain and quality of life characteristics were similar between participants who completed the questionnaire 1 year after surgery and those who did not. Analyses utilizing these longitudinal data will advance personalized treatment decision making for adolescents and young adults with endometriosis.

PROBLEM Associations between immune dysfunction conditions (eg, systemic lupus erythematous, rheumatoid arthritis) and endometriosis have been observed in adult women, but not assessed among a younger population. We investigated the association between immune-mediated conditions and endometriosis among young women. METHOD OF STUDY This cross-sectional analysis in the Women's Health Study: From Adolescence to Adulthood included 551 participants with surgically diagnosed endometriosis (median age=19) and 652 controls without endometriosis (median age=24). Participants completed an expanded Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonization Project questionnaire. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to investigate the associations between autoimmune/inflammatory, atopic, chronic pain/fatigue, and endocrine disorders with endometriosis, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS Participants with any autoimmune and/or inflammatory condition had an increased odds of co-occurring endometriosis (OR: 1.87; CI: 0.92-3.80), as did participants with allergies (OR: 1.76; CI: 1.32-2.36), asthma (OR: 1.35; CI: 0.97-1.88), chronic fatigue syndrome and/or fibromyalgia (OR: 5.81; CI: 1.89-17.9), or previous mononucleosis (OR: 1.75; CI: 1.14-2.68). Odds of endometriosis were lower among participants with eczema (OR: 0.68; CI: 0.44-1.04). We observed a positive trend between the number of immune-mediated conditions and the odds of endometriosis (p-trend=0.0002). Endocrine disorders were not associated with endometriosis. CONCLUSIONS Among this population of adolescents and adult women, endometriosis was more likely among participants with autoimmune and/or inflammatory diseases, allergies, asthma, previous mononucleosis infection, and chronic fatigue and/or fibromyalgia. We observed that an increasing number of immune-mediated conditions were positively associated with endometriosis risk. It is important for clinicians who care for adolescents and women with these conditions to consider endometriosis as a comorbidity.

Endometriosis is a painful gynecologic disease affecting one in ten reproductive aged women worldwide. Few studies have correlated this symptomatology with biomarker levels among women with and without endometriosis, and no studies correlating pain with biomarker levels have been performed in young patient populations. The purpose of this study was to examine whether CA125 correlates with different types and severity of pain among adolescents and young women with and without endometriosis and assess its performance as an endometriosis biomarker among those presenting with dysmenorrhea in this young population. Reproductive-aged women with laparoscopically-confirmed endometriosis (n = 282) and controls (n = 293) who participated in The Women's Health Study: From Adolescence to Adulthood (A2A), a cohort of adolescents and young women enrolled from 2012-2018, were included in this cross-sectional analysis. Plasma CA125 values were measured using WERF EPHect compliant blood samples collected at enrollment. Average CA125 were calculated by self-reported pain type (i.e. dysmenorrhea, non-cyclic/general pelvic pain, dyspareunia), severity, and frequency in endometriosis cases and controls. Median age at blood draw was 24 years in controls and 17 years in cases, with 68% and 89% non-Hispanic white, respectively. Most endometriosis cases (95%) were rASRM stage I/II. Average CA125 values were 12.5 U/mL in controls and 12.1 U/mL in cases adjusted for age. CA125 did not differ by pain type, its severity, or frequency in endometriosis cases or controls. Among participants who reported dysmenorrhea, CA125 did not discriminate endometriosis cases from controls using cutoff of 35 U/mL (AUC = 0.51, 95%CI = 0.50-0.53). Among adolescents and young adult women, CA125 did not correlate with pain type. CA125 did not efficiently discriminate endometriosis cases from controls even when accounting for pain symptomatology. Average CA125 values were low in adolescents and young women in both endometriosis cases and controls, suggesting cautious interpretation may be needed when measuring CA125 in this population.

Endometriosis affects approximately 10% of women of reproductive age. Characteristics robustly associated with a greater risk for endometriosis include early age at menarche, short menstrual cycle length, and lean body size, whereas greater parity has been associated with a lower risk. Relationships with other potential characteristics including physical activity, dietary factors, and lactation have been less consistent, partially because of the need for rigorous data collection and a longitudinal study design. Critical methodologic complexities include the need for a clear case definition; valid selection of comparison/control groups; and consideration of diagnostic bias and reverse causation when exploring demographic characteristics, medical history, and lifestyle factors. Reviewers and editors must demand a detailed description of rigorous methods to facilitate comparison and replication to advance our understanding of endometriosis.

Most research treats endometriosis as a single entity, potentially obscuring informative subtype-specific associations with risk factors, biomarkers and treatment responses. A 2020 study raises the hypothesis that deep endometriosis oestrogen receptor-α expression might be associated with progestin treatment and the degree of post-surgical excision pain.

Background: Ovarian cancer survival is poor, particularly for platinum-resistant cases. The previous literature on pre-diagnostic reproductive factors and ovarian cancer survival has been mixed. Therefore, we evaluated pre-diagnostic reproductive and hormonal factors with overall survival and, additionally, platinum-chemotherapy resistance. Methods: We followed 1649 invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases who were enrolled between 1992 and 2008 for overall mortality within the New England Case-Control Study and abstracted chemotherapy data on a subset (n=449). We assessed pre-diagnostic reproductive and hormonal factors during in-person interviews. We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox-proportional hazards models. Results: We observed 911 all-cause deaths among 1649 ovarian cancer cases. Self-reported endometriosis and longer duration of hormone therapy use were associated with improved survival (HR: 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54–0.94 and HR, ⩾5 years vs never: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.55–0.90, respectively). Older age at menopause and menarche were associated with worse survival (HR, ⩽50 vs >50 years: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.03–1.46 and HR, 13 vs

Introduction: Ovarian cancer survival is poor particularly for women with platinum-resistant disease. Therefore evaluating pre-diagnostic risk factors that are associated with ovarian cancer survival and platinum resistance in particular may help identify women who will not benefit from standard therapy. However, limited research has assessed pre-diagnostic reproductive and hormonal factors in relation to ovarian cancer survival and no studies have assessed these factors with platinum resistance. Objective: To evaluate the association of pre-diagnostic reproductive and hormonal factors with both ovarian cancer survival and platinum resistance among ovarian cancer patients. Methods: We included 1,648 cases of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer from a population-based case-control study with cases and controls recruited in Eastern Massachusetts and New Hampshire from 1992-2008. Reproductive and hormonal factors, including oral contraceptive use, parity, tubal ligation and endometriosis, were assessed during in-person interviews. Invasive ovarian cancer cases who received platinum chemotherapy and had medical record follow-up data (n=610) were included in the analyses on platinum resistance, which was defined as a recurrence within the first six months after the end of platinum-based chemotherapy. We used Cox proportional hazards models to calculate overall ovarian cancer survival and platinum resistance controlling for age, enrollment wave, reproductive factors, and tumor histology and stage. The same reproductive and hormonal factors were assessed for ovarian cancer survival and platinum resistance. As the cause of death was not known for all cases, we also restricted follow-up to the first five years when the vast majority of deaths should be from ovarian cancer in a secondary analysis. Results: We observed 906 deaths during 13,920 person-years of follow-up. Self-report of a physician diagnosis of endometriosis was associated with a 28% (95% CI: 0.55-0.95; p=0.02) decreased risk of death from ovarian cancer. We observed no association between oral contraceptive use, parity, age at first birth, and ovulatory years and ovarian cancer survival (p>0.17). Restricting analyses to the first five years did not substantially change the results. In preliminary analyses, 162 of the 610 women with platinum-based therapy had a disease recurrence within six months of ending treatment over 3,216 person-months of follow-up. Ever having a spontaneous or induced abortion was associated with a 44% (95% CI: 1.00-2.07; p=0.05) increased risk of platinum resistance but was not associated with overall ovarian cancer survival (p=0.18). Additionally, there was a suggestion that increasing age at menarche (Hazard ratio (HR): 1.13; 95% CI: 0.99-1.29 per year; p=0.07) and physician-diagnosed endometriosis (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.19-1.05; p=0.06) were associated with platinum resistance. No association was observed for oral contraceptive use, parity, age at first birth, and ovulatory years (p>0.53), although the results were based on a small sample size. Conclusion: Increasing age at menarche and ever having a spontaneous or induced abortion were associated with an increased risk of platinum chemotherapy resistance. Additionally, physician-diagnosed endometriosis was associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer death and a suggestion of a reduced risk of platinum-resistance after adjusting for various factors including tumor histology. Although endometriosis increases the risk of endometrioid and clear cell tumors, which tend to have a more favorable prognosis, our data suggest endometriosis may improve survival through pathways other than tumor histology. Citation Format: Amy L. Shafrir, Ana Babic, Rulla M. Tamimi, Bernard A. Rosner, Shelley S. Tworoger, Kathryn L. Terry. Reproductive and hormonal risk factors in relation to ovarian cancer survival and platinum resistance. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research: Exploiting Vulnerabilities; Oct 17-20, 2015; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B33.