Search

Objectives: Patients with advanced stage endometrial carcinoma constitute a heterogeneous group of patients with different stages, tumor histologic types, and involved sites. Hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-ophorectomy, and surgical staging are the cornerstone of surgical management in these patients. The optimal adjuvant therapy is yet to be established. An expert panel was convened to reach consensus on the most appropriate management options in this group of patients., Methods: The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment., Results: Four clinical variants were developed to address common scenarios in the management of women with advanced-stage endometrial carcinoma. Group members reached consensus on the appropriateness of specific evaluation and treatment approaches with numerical ratings., Conclusions: In combining available medical literature and expert opinions, this manuscript may serve as an aid for other practitioners in the appropriate management of women with advanced-stage endometrial carcinoma.

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic and the fourth most common malignancy in women in the United States. Cross-sectional imaging plays a vital role in pretreatment assessment of endometrial cancers and should be viewed as a complementary tool for surgical evaluation and planning of these patients. Although transvaginal US remains the preferred examination for the screening purposes, MRI has emerged as the modality of choice for the staging of endometrial cancer and imaging assessment of recurrence or treatment response. A combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted MRI provides the highest accuracy for the staging. Both CT and MRI perform equivalently for assessing nodal involvement or distant metastasis. PET-CT is more appropriate for assessing lymphadenopathy in high-grade FDG-avid tumors or for clinically suspected recurrence after treatment. An appropriate use and guidelines of imaging techniques in diagnosis, staging, and detection of endometrial cancer and treatment of recurrent disease are reviewed.The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every two years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of combining low-dose fractionated whole abdominal radiation (LDF-WAR) with weekly full-dose cisplatin (FD-CDDP) for patients with stage III/IV endometrial carcinoma., Methods: Patients with optimally debulked stage III/IV carcinoma of the endometrium (without extra-abdominal disease) were eligible for the study. Postoperatively, patients received the institutional standard systemic chemotherapy and vaginal brachytherapy. Patients then underwent experimental six weekly cycles of FD-CDDP (40 mg/m², maximum 70 mg IV) followed by LDF-WAR 6-8 hours after initiation of chemotherapy. In a conservative design, 6 patients were accrued to two sequential cohorts of LDF-WAR, at 0.5 Gy/fraction [Fx] (total 3 Gy) and 0.75 Gy/Fx (total 4.5 Gy). Toxicities and laboratory studies were evaluated at each visit., Results: Twelve patients were enrolled from January 2005 to June 2009 with median follow-up of 13.5 months (range: 5-27 months). Seventy-five percent of enrolled patients had uterine papillary serous histology. Eleven patients at least partially completed therapy (range: 2-6 cycles of FD-CDDP/LDF-WAR) with one additional patient opting out at the higher dose level. Combination therapy overall was well tolerated. Three patients in each cohort experienced grade 3 acute hematologic events with one recorded grade 4 toxicity in the second cohort. Of patients receiving any of the experimental treatment, five have experienced recurrences. Three of these patients were in cohort one and received 0.5 Gy/Fx LDF-WAR., Conclusion: Combination therapy with LDF-WAR as a novel chemopotentiator to FD-CDDP is a feasible adjuvant regimen in optimally debulked patients with stage III/IV endometrial carcinoma. Further investigation is warranted to determine treatment efficacy., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

High-risk endometrial cancer comprises an uncommon group of tumors, which includes pathological stage III adenocarcinoma and all stages of papillary serous carcinoma. Optimal management of this class of malignant female genital neoplasms is surgical resection, including debulking of any gross abdominopelvic disease. This article analyzes the literature concerning the use of adjunctive radiotherapy. The data presented suggest that postoperative whole abdominal radiotherapy may improve outcome in selected subsets of patients within this high-risk group. Future clinical investigations will greatly benefit from the anticipated published results of two completed prospective cooperative group clinical trials that involve whole abdominal irradiation.

This study is based on a retrospective review of 156 patients with endometrial carcinoma from 1978 through 1984 who underwent primary surgical evaluation. All cases were retrospectively restaged using the newly adopted FIGO surgical staging. The preoperative FIGO clinical stage distribution for this study was as follows: 121 (77.6%) Stage I, 22 (14.1%) Stage II, 5 (3.2%) Stage III, 2 (1.3%) Stage IV, and 6 (3.8%) unstaged patients. Most patients had TAH-BSO with a collection of peritoneal washings and retroperitoneal lymph node sampling. Surgical staging revealed 122 (78.2%) Stage I, 9 (5.8%) Stage II, 12 (7.7%) Stage III, and 13 (8.3%) Stage IV patients. Surgery upstaged 12.4% of clinical Stage I. In clinical stage II, 59.0% were downstaged while 27.3% were upstaged. For clinical Stage III, 60.6% were upstaged, but no downstaging occurred. No change in stage occurred for clinical Stage IV patients. Ninety-seven surgically staged patients received no adjuvant therapy. The remaining 59 patients had adjunctive treatment which consisted of radiotherapy (59.3%), hormonal therapy (25.4%), chemotherapy (5.1%), or combined modality treatment (10.2%). All patients were followed until death or a minimum of 5 years (60-139 months; median, 82 months) with the exception of 13 patients who were lost to follow-up (2-58 months; median, 34 months). Five-year survival by clinical staging was as follows: 86.2% for Stage I, 85.9% for Stage II, and 0% for Stage III and IV. Five-year survival by surgical staging was 90.6% for Stage I, 85.7% for Stage II, 58.3% for Stage III, and 0% for Stage IV. The 13 patients who were lost to follow-up were censored in all survival analyses at the time of last contact. Stepwise regression analysis using a parametric proportional hazards model identified surgical stage as the most significant prognostic factor (P = 0.02). Univariate analysis showed that patients with surgical Stage IC had significantly worse prognosis (75.0%, 5 years) than those in surgical Stage IA (93.8% 5 YS) or IB (95.4% 5 years). In summary, this study demonstrates that surgical staging as recommended by FIGO is indicated to accurately determine the initial extent of disease in endometrial carcinoma. In addition, surgical staging is the strongest predictor of survival. Deep myometrial invasion appears to be a significant independent prognostic factor within surgical Stage I. The role of adjunctive radiotherapy in Stage I disease awaits the results from an ongoing multi-institutional, prospectively randomized trial.