Search

Purpose: Patients with advanced endometrial cancer (EC) who progress on or after platinum-based therapy and immunotherapy have poor prognosis. We report efficacy and safety of sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2)-directed antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with advanced EC., Methods: TROPiCS-03 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03964727) is a multicohort, open-label, phase II basket study in patients with metastatic solid tumors. Eligible patients in the EC cohort received SG 10 mg/kg once on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by investigator's assessment per RECIST v1.1. Secondary end points included clinical benefit rate (CBR; complete and partial response, and stable disease ≥6 months), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator assessment, overall survival, and safety. Trop-2 expression of archival or baseline tumor specimens was analyzed by immunohistochemistry., Results: At data extraction date, 41 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 5.8 months (range, 0.7-19.3); median previous therapies was three (range, 1-6); and 85% of patients received previous chemotherapy and immunotherapy. ORR was 22% (95% CI, 11 to 38); CBR was 32% (95% CI, 18 to 48). Median DOR was 8.8 months (95% CI, 2.8 to not estimable); median PFS was 4.8 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 9.8). Trop-2 exploratory analysis was conducted retrospectively for 39 patients. Tumor Trop-2 protein was highly expressed in EC, showing limited correlation with efficacy. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 73% of patients. Study drug discontinuation due to TRAEs was 5%. Two deaths occurred, deemed unrelated to SG., Conclusion: Findings from TROPiCS-03 showed encouraging efficacy of SG with a manageable toxicity profile in a heavily pretreated population with advanced EC. Safety findings were consistent with the known SG safety profile.

Background: High-grade endometrial cancers (EAC) are aggressive tumors with a high risk of progression after treatment. As EAC may harbor mutations in the RAS/MAPK pathways, we evaluated the preclinical in vitro and in vivo efficacy of avutometinib, a RAF/MEK clamp, in combination with the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) inhibitors defactinib or VS-4718, against multiple primary EAC cell lines and xenografts., Methods: Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was used to evaluate the genetic landscape of five primary EAC cell lines. The in vitro activity of avutometinib and defactinib as single agents and in combination was evaluated using cell viability, cell cycle, and cytotoxicity assays. Mechanistic studies were performed using Western blot assays while in vivo experiments were completed in UTE10 engrafted mice treated with either vehicle, avutometinib, VS-4718, or their combination through oral gavage., Results: WES results demonstrated multiple EAC cell lines to harbor genetic derangements in the RAS/MAPK pathway including KRAS/PTEN/PIK3CA/BRAF/ARID1A, potentially sensitizing to FAK and RAF/MEK inhibition. Five out of five of the EAC cell lines demonstrated in vitro sensitivity to FAK and/or RAF/MEK inhibition. By Western blot assays, exposure of EAC cell lines to defactinib, avutometinib, and their combination demonstrated decreased phosphorylated FAK (p-FAK) as well as decreased p-MEK and p-ERK. In vivo the combination of avutometinib/VS-4718 demonstrated superior tumor growth inhibition compared to single-agent treatment and controls starting at Day 9 (p < 0.02 and p < 0.04) in UTE10 xenografts., Conclusions: Avutometinib, defactinib, and to a larger extent their combinations, demonstrated promising in vitro and in vivo activity against EAC cell lines and xenografts. These preclinical data support the potential clinical evaluation of this combination in high-grade EAC patients., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. We report the final prespecified analysis for overall survival (OS), along with updated progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR), and safety from the open-label, randomized, phase III Study 309/KEYNOTE-775. In total, 827 patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic endometrial cancer (EC) were randomly assigned to receive lenvatinib 20 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks (n = 411) or chemotherapy of the treating physician's choice (doxorubicin 60 mg/m 2 intravenously once every 3 weeks or paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 intravenously once weekly [3 weeks on; 1 week off] [n = 416]). Efficacy was reported for patients with mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) tumors and all-comers, and by subgroups (histology, prior therapy, MMR status). Updated safety was also reported.Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab showed benefits in OS (pMMR HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.83; all-comer HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.77), PFS (pMMR HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.72; all-comer HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.66), and ORR (pMMR patients, 32.4% v 15.1%; all-comers, 33.8% v 14.7%) versus chemotherapy. OS, PFS, and ORR favored lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in all subgroups of interest. No new safety signals were observed. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab continued to show improved efficacy versus chemotherapy and manageable safety in patients with previously treated advanced EC.

Purpose: Lenvatinib and pembrolizumab (LEN+PEMBRO) demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in efficacy versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with advanced endometrial cancer (aEC) in the phase 3 Study 309/KEYNOTE-775. Health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) is reported., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive LEN+PEMBRO (n = 411; LEN 20 mg/day; PEMBRO 200 mg Q3W) or TPC (n = 416; doxorubicin 60 mg/m 2 Q3W or paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 [weekly, 3 weeks on/1 week off]). Impact of treatment on HRQoL assessed by the global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) score of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was a secondary objective; other scales of the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), EORTC QLQ-Endometrial, 24 questions (EORTC QLQ-EN24), and EuroQoL 5 dimensions, 5 levels (EQ-5D-5L) were exploratory objectives. HRQoL was assessed on day 1 of each cycle. Completion/compliance, change from baseline, time to first and definitive deterioration were assessed. No multiplicity adjustments were applied for HRQoL endpoints., Results: The latest timepoint at which the predefined rates of completion (≥60%) and compliance (≥80%) were met was week 12. HRQoL at week 12 between treatment groups was generally similar. Time to first deterioration symptom scales favoured LEN+PEMBRO for QLQ-C30 dyspnoea, and QLQ-EN24 for poor body image, tingling/numbness, and hair loss; and TPC was favoured for QLQ-C30 pain, appetite loss, and diarrhoea, and QLQ-EN24 muscular pain. While the QLQ-C30 physical functional scale favoured TPC, other functional scales were generally similar between arms. Time to definitive deterioration favoured LEN+PEMBRO on most scales., Conclusion: HRQoL data from Study 309/KEYNOTE-775, with previously published efficacy and safety results, indicate that LEN+PEMBRO has an overall favourable benefit/risk profile versus TPC for the treatment of patients with aEC., Clinicaltrials: GOV: NCT03517449., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Domenica Lorusso: Advisory Board: GSK, AstraZeneca, MSD, Clovis Oncology, PharmaMar, Merck Serono, Seagen, Immunogen, Genmab, Oncoinvest, Corcept, Sutro; Consultancy: PharmaMar, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, GSK, MSD, Immunogen, Genmab, Seagen; Funding (inst.): MSD, Clovis Oncology, GSK, PharmaMar, AstraZeneca, Seagen, Genmab, Immogen, Incyte, Novartis, Roche; Invited Speaker: Genmab, PharmaMar, MSD; Principal Investigator: AstraZeneca, MSD, Genmab, Immunogen, Clovis, Roche, Incyte; Board of Directors: GCIG Nicoletta Colombo: Honoraria: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunogen, mersana, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche/Genentech, Tesaro; Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, BioCad, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunogen, Mersana, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche/Genentech, Tesaro Antonio Casado Herraez: advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, Merck, PharmaMar; some support for attending major international oncological conferences (virtually or face to face meetings) from PharmaMar, Lilly, Roche, AstraZeneca-Merck and GSK; Research support (institution): PharmaMar Alessandro Santin: grants from Puma, Immunomedics, Gilead, Synthon, Merck, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Genentech, Tesaro, Eisai; personal fees from Merck, Tesaro, Eisai Emeline Colomba: Honoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Merck; Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Pfizer David Scott Miller: Advisory Board: Eisai, Karyopharm, Tesaro, Tarveda, Myriad, GlaxoSmithKline, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, EMD Serono, Seagen; Board of Directors/Leadership Role: NRG Oncology; Research Grant: NRG Oncology, Karyopharm, Advaxis, Immunogen, Advenchen, Regeneron, Merck, Agenus, Akesobio, EMD Serono Keiichi Fujiwara: Honoraria: Chugai Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Nippon Kayaku, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda, Zeria Pharmaceutical; Consulting or Advisory Role: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Genmab, MSD, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda; Research Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Genmab, Immunogen, Kaken Pharmaceutical, Lilly, MSD, Oncotherapeutics, Ono Pharmaceutical, Regeneron, Shionogi, Zeria Pharmaceutical; Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Abbvie, MSD, Pfizer; Consulting or Advisory Role - Abbvie; AstraZeneca; Eisai; Genmab; MSD; Pfizer; Taiho Pharmaceutical; Takeda; Research Funding - AstraZeneca (Inst); Chugai Pharma (Inst); Eisai (Inst); Genmab (Inst); Immunogen (Inst); Kaken Pharmaceutical (Inst); Lilly (Inst); MSD (Inst); Oncotherapeutics (Inst); Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst); Regeneron (Inst); Shionogi (Inst); Zeria Pharmaceutical (Inst); Travel, Accommodations, Expenses - Abbvie; MSD; Pfizer Sandro Pignata: Honoraria: AstraZeneca, MSD, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche, Tesaro; Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche, Tesaro; Research Funding (institution) AstraZeneca, MSD, Pfizer, Roche Sally E. Baron-Hay: Consultancy fees: Eisai, Merck Sharp and Dohme (Australia Pty Ltd), Pfizer, AstraZeneca Australia; Honoraria: Amgen, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Australia Pty Ptd, Eli Lilly Australia, Roche, Merck Sharp and Dohme (Australia Pty Ltd) Isabelle Laure Ray-Coquard: Honoraria: Abbvie, Advaxis, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Clovis Oncology, DECIPHERA, Genmab, GlaxoSmithKline, MERSANA, MSD Oncology, OxOnc, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche, Tesaro; Consulting or Advisory Role: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Clovis Oncology, Deciphera, Genmab, GlaxoSmithKline, Mersana, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche, Tesaro; Research Funding: BMS, MSD Oncology; Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Advaxis, AstraZeneca, BMS, Clovis Oncology, GlaxoSmithKline, PharmaMar, Roche, Tesaro Ronnie Shapira-Frommer: Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Medison, MSD, NeoPharm, Novartis, Roche; Consulting or Advisory Role: MSD, VBL Therapeutics; Research Funding: MSD Yong Man Kim: Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Genolution, Johnson & Johnson; Research Funding: Regeneron, Roche Mary McCormack: Research Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche; honoraria from GSK, AZ, and Eisai. Rachid Massaad: Full-time employee of MSD Europe Allison Martin Nguyen: Full-time employee/stock ownership: Merck & Co., Inc. Qi Zhao: Full time employee of Eisai Inc. Jodi McKenzie: Full time employee of Eisai Inc. Vimalanand S. Prabhu: Full-time employee/stock ownership: Merck & Co., Inc.; Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck & Co., Inc Vicky Makker: study support (all funding to institution) / consultancy / advisory board membership from AstraZeneca, Clovis, Eisai, Faeth, Genentech, GSK, iTEOS, Karyopharm, Moreo, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Takeda, Zymeworks; Dr Makker is supported in part by the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Molecular profiling is developing to inform treatment in endometrial cancer. Using real world evidence, we sought to evaluate frontline immune checkpoint inhibitor vs chemotherapy effectiveness in advanced endometrial cancer, stratified by Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) ≥10 mut/MB and microsatellite instability (MSI)., Methods: Patients with advanced endometrial cancer in the US-based de-identified Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine Clinico-Genomic Database were included. Data originated from patients treated between January 2011- March 2022 at 280 US clinics. Next-generation sequencing assays were performed via FoundationOne or FoundationOneCDx. Longitudinal clinical data were derived from electronic health records. Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment included pembrolizumab, dostarlimab, and nivolumab monotherapies. Time to next treatment, time to treatment discontinuation, and overall survival were assessed with the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for known prognostic factors. We used the Likelihood ratio test to compare biomarker performance., Results: A total of 343 patients received chemotherapy and 28 received immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy as frontline treatment. Patients who received monotherapy were more likely to be stage III at diagnosis (immune checkpoint inhibitor: 54.6% vs chemotherapy: 15.0%; p<0.001) and more likely to test MSI-high via next-generation sequencing (immune checkpoint inhibitor: 53.6% vs chemotherapy: 19.2%; p<0.001). In MSI-high cancers, single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor had a more favorable time to next treatment (aHR: 0.18, p=0.001) and overall survival (aHR 0.29, p=0.045). Additional analyses on 70 unique tumor specimens revealed mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) via immunohistochemistry and MSI-high via next-generation sequencing concordance (91%), with nominal improvement of MSI over dMMR to predict time to treatment discontinuation (p=0.030), time to next treatment (p=0.032), and overall survival (p=0.22). MSI status was concordant with tumor mutational burden ≥10 in 94.3% of cases., Conclusion: Immune checkpoint inhibitors may have improved efficacy over chemotherapy in frontline treatment for advanced endometrial cancer defined by MSI-high using next-generation sequencing as a nominally better predictor of outcomes than dMMR with immunohistochemistry. This provides the biologic rationale of active phase III trials., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Ryon P. Graf, PhD; Kunal Shah, BS; Natalie Danziger, BS; Douglas I. Lin, MD, PhD, Julia Quintanilha, PhD; Gerald Li, PhD; Julia Elvin, MD, PhD are employees of Foundation Medicine, a wholly owned subsidiary of Roche, and have equity interest in Roche. Roche produces atezolizumab, an ICI. Alessandro D. Santin receives grants from Puma, Immunomedics, Gilead, Synthon, Merck, Boehinger-Ingelheim, Genentech, Eisai, and Tesaro; and also personal fees from Merck, Tesaro, and Eisai. Brian Slomovitz has consultant roles with AstraZeneca, Clovis, GSK, Genentech, Lilly, Merck, Eisai, Genmab, Novartis, Addy, Immunogen. Ramez Eskander reports the following: consulting, advisory, and grant funding from AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Genentech, Merck, Eisai, Genmab, Seagen, Immunogen, Mersana, Myriad. No other authors have conflicts of interest to report., (© IGCS and ESGO 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.)

Mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) cancers have varied responses to immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB). We conducted a phase II clinical trial of the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in 24 patients with MMRd endometrial cancer (NCT02899793). Patients with mutational MMRd tumors (6 patients) had higher response rates and longer survival than those with epigenetic MMRd tumors (18 patients). Mutation burden was higher in tumors with mutational MMRd compared with epigenetic MMRd; however, within each category of MMRd, mutation burden was not correlated with ICB response. Pretreatment JAK1 mutations were not associated with primary resistance to pembrolizumab. Longitudinal single-cell RNA-seq of circulating immune cells revealed contrasting modes of antitumor immunity for mutational versus epigenetic MMRd cancers. Whereas effector CD8+ T cells correlated with regression of mutational MMRd tumors, activated CD16+ NK cells were associated with ICB-responsive epigenetic MMRd tumors. These data highlight the interplay between tumor-intrinsic and tumor-extrinsic factors that influence ICB response., Significance: The molecular mechanism of MMRd is associated with response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in endometrial carcinoma. Tumors with epigenetic MMRd or mutational MMRd are correlated with NK cell or CD8+ T cell-driven immunity, respectively. Classifying tumors by the mechanism of MMRd may inform clinical decision-making regarding cancer immunotherapy. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 247., (©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a biomarker for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Whether mechanisms underlying microsatellite instability alter responses to ICIs is unclear. This article reports data from a prospective phase 2 pilot study of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent MSI-H endometrial cancer (EC) analyzed by whole exome sequencing (WES) and potential mechanisms of primary/secondary ICI resistance (NCT02899793)., Methods: Patients with measurable MSI-H/dMMR EC confirmed by polymerase chain reaction/immunohistochemistry were evaluated by WES and received 200 mg of pembrolizumab every 3 weeks for ≤2 years. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: Twenty-five patients (24 evaluable) were treated. Six patients (25%) harbored Lynch/Lynch-like tumors, whereas 18 (75%) had sporadic EC. The tumor mutation burden was higher in Lynch-like tumors (median, 2939 mutations/megabase [Mut/Mb]; interquartile range [IQR], 867-5108 Mut/Mb) than sporadic tumors (median, 604 Mut/Mb; IQR, 411-798 Mut/Mb; P = .0076). The ORR was 100% in Lynch/Lynch-like patients but only 44% in sporadic patients (P = .024). The 3-year PFS and OS proportions were 100% versus 30% (P = .017) and 100% versus 43% (P = .043), respectively., Conclusions: This study suggests prognostic significance of Lynch-like cancers versus sporadic MSI-H/dMMR ECs for ORR, PFS, and OS when patients are treated with pembrolizumab. Larger confirmatory studies in ECs and other MSI-H/dMMR tumors are necessary. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses serve as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI-H ECs. Oligoprogression in MSI-H/dMMR patients appears salvageable with surgical resection and/or local treatment and the continuation of pembrolizumab off study. Clinical studies evaluating separate MSI-H/dMMR EC subtypes treated with ICIs are warranted., (© 2021 American Cancer Society.)

Introduction: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy. Outcomes for patients with advanced and/or recurrent disease have been modest with the use of chemotherapy. The approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1 has recently revolutionized human cancer treatment. Recent trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors used alone or in combination with other agents, have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in the treatment of the all-comers EC patient population., Areas Covered: In this article, we review major clinical trials on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced and recurrent EC and discuss the response rates of these agents in the context of their genomic background., Expert Opinion: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly changed our approach to the treatment of advanced/recurrent EC. Single agent anti-PD-1 regimens are highly effective in MMRd/MSI-H patients, but their clinical efficacy remains modest in MMR proficient/TMB low EC patients. Combination regimens that can decrease the tumor microenvironments immunosuppression and increase tumor immunogenicity represent a viable treatment option to broaden the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced/recurrent EC patients. An increased understanding of the biomarkers of response and the molecular mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors remains key for the next advancement of the field.

Background: Standard therapy for advanced endometrial cancer after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy remains unclear., Methods: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with advanced endometrial cancer who had previously received at least one platinum-based chemotherapy regimen to receive either lenvatinib (20 mg, administered orally once daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg, administered intravenously every 3 weeks) or chemotherapy of the treating physician's choice (doxorubicin at 60 mg per square meter of body-surface area, administered intravenously every 3 weeks, or paclitaxel at 80 mg per square meter, administered intravenously weekly [with a cycle of 3 weeks on and 1 week off]). The two primary end points were progression-free survival as assessed on blinded independent central review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, and overall survival. The end points were evaluated in patients with mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) disease and in all patients. Safety was also assessed., Results: A total of 827 patients (697 with pMMR disease and 130 with mismatch repair-deficient disease) were randomly assigned to receive lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (411 patients) or chemotherapy (416 patients). The median progression-free survival was longer with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab than with chemotherapy (pMMR population: 6.6 vs. 3.8 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50 to 0.72; P<0.001; overall: 7.2 vs. 3.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.66; P<0.001). The median overall survival was longer with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab than with chemotherapy (pMMR population: 17.4 vs. 12.0 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.84; P<0.001; overall: 18.3 vs. 11.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.75; P<0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 88.9% of the patients who received lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and in 72.7% of those who received chemotherapy., Conclusions: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab led to significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival than chemotherapy among patients with advanced endometrial cancer. (Funded by Eisai and Merck Sharp and Dohme [a subsidiary of Merck]; Study 309-KEYNOTE-775 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03517449.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Frequently involving an endometrial polyp, minimal uterine serous carcinoma (MUSC) represents the earliest recognizable forms of endometrial serous carcinoma. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive morphological and clinical outcome assessment of MUSC involving endometrial polyp. A total of 77 fully staged MUSCs involving endometrial polyp were identified, including 53 MUSCs confined to polyp and 24 nonpolyp confined tumors. Extrauterine disease was found in 17% (9/53) of polyp-confined MUSCs compared to 41.7% (10/24) of nonpolyp confined tumors (p = 0.02). Lymphovascular invasion was observed in 3.8% (2/53) of polyp-confined cases compared to 25% (6/24) of nonpolyp confined cases (p = 0.047). Lymph node metastasis was observed in 11.3% (6/53) of polyp-confined cases, compared to 29.2% (7/24) of nonpolyp confined cases (p = 0.058). Positive pelvic washing cytology was seen in 18.9% (10/53) of polyp-confined versus 37.5% (9/24) of nonpolyp confined tumors (p = 0.078). Overall, 58 of 77 (75.3%) patients had low tumor stage (57 stage I cases and 1 stage II case) and only two patients (3.5%) had a recurrence. In contrast, 19 of 77 (24.7%) patients had advanced stage (stage III or IV) disease and 17 (89.5%) patients had recurrence (p < 0.0001). Only one of 57 low-stage patient (1.7%) versus 11 of 19 high-stage patients (57.8%) died of the tumor (p < 0.0001). Five of 53 (9.4%) patients with polyp-confined MUSC and 7 of 24 (29.2%) patients with nonpolyp confined MUSC died of the disease (p = 0.03). In conclusion, while a small percentage of MUSCs exist without the involvement of an endometrial polyp, a close topographic relationship between MUSC and the endometrial polyp is confirmed in this largest series, supporting the theory that most if not all MUSCs arise in an EMP. Patients with MUSC without extrauterine spread have an excellent prognosis. Compared to patients with MUSC confined to an endometrial polyp, patients with MUSC extending to the background endometrium have a significantly higher risk for high-stage disease at presentation., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Endometrial cancers (ECs) with somatic mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) are characterized by unfavorable pathological features, which prompt adjuvant treatment. Paradoxically, women with POLE-mutated EC have outstanding clinical outcomes, and this raises concerns of overtreatment. The authors investigated whether favorable outcomes were independent of treatment., Methods: A PubMed search for POLE and endometrial was restricted to articles published between March 1, 2012, and March 1, 2018, that provided individual patient data (IPD), adjuvant treatment, and survival. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for IPD, the authors used univariate and multivariate one-stage meta-analyses with mixed effects Cox models (random effects for study cohorts) to infer the associations of treatment, traditional prognostic factors, and outcome, which was defined as the time from first diagnosis to any adverse event (progression/recurrence or death from EC)., Results: Three hundred fifty-nine women with POLE-mutated EC were identified; 294 (82%) had pathogenic mutations. Worse outcomes were demonstrated in patients with nonpathogenic POLE mutations (hazard ratio, 3.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-7.58; log-rank P < .01). Except for stage (P < .01), traditional prognosticators were not associated with progression/recurrence or death from disease. Adverse events were rare (11 progressions/recurrences and 3 disease-specific deaths). Salvage rates in patients who experienced recurrence were high and sustained, with 8 of 11 alive without evidence of disease (range, 5.5-14.2 years). Adjuvant treatment was not associated with outcome., Conclusions: Clinical outcomes for ECs with pathogenic POLE mutations are not associated with most traditional risk parameters, and patients do not appear to benefit from adjuvant therapy. The observed low rates of recurrence/progression and the high and sustained salvage rates raise the possibility of safely de-escalating treatment for these patients., Lay Summary: Ten percent of all endometrial cancers have mutations in the DNA repair gene DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE). Women who have endometrial cancers with true POLE mutations experience almost no recurrences or deaths from their cancer even when their tumors appear to have very unfavorable characteristics. Additional therapy (radiation and chemotherapy) does not appear to improve outcomes for women with POLE-mutated endometrial cancer, and this supports the move to less therapy and less associated toxicity. Diligent classification of endometrial cancers by molecular features provides valuable information to inform prognosis and to direct treatment/no treatment., (© 2021 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: Uterine-serous-carcinoma (USC) is an aggressive variant of endometrial cancer. On the basis of preliminary results of a multicenter, randomized phase II trial, trastuzumab (T), a humanized-mAb targeting Her2/Neu, in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/P), is recognized as an alternative in treating advanced/recurrent HER2/Neu-positive USC. We report the updated survival analysis of NCT01367002., Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had stage III to IV or recurrent disease. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive C/P for six cycles ± T followed by maintenance T until progression or toxicity. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint; overall survival (OS) and toxicity were secondary endpoints., Results: Sixty-one patients were randomized. After a median-follow-up of 25.9 months, 43 progressions and 38 deaths occurred among 58 evaluable patients. Updated median-PFS continued to favor the T-arm, with medians of 8.0 months versus 12.9 months in the control and T-arms (HR = 0.46; 90% CI, 0.28-0.76; P = 0.005). Median-PFS was 9.3 months versus 17.7 months among 41 patients with stage III to IV disease undergoing primary treatment (HR = 0.44; 90% CI, 0.23-0.83; P = 0.015), and 7.0 months versus 9.2 months among 17 patients with recurrent disease (HR = 0.12; 90% CI, 0.03-0.48; P = 0.004). OS was higher in the T compared with the control arm, with medians of 29.6 months versus 24.4 months (HR = 0.58; 90% CI, 0.34-0.99; P = 0.046). The benefit was most notable in those with stage III to IV disease, with survival median not reached in the T-arm versus 24.4 months in the control arm (HR = 0.49; 90% CI, 0.25-0.97; P = 0.041). Toxicity was not different between arms., Conclusions: Addition of T to C/P increased PFS and OS in women with advanced/recurrent HER2/Neu-positive USC, with the greatest benefit seen for the treatment of stage III to IV disease., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries. The antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) sacituzumab govitecan (SG) targets trophoblast cell-surface antigen-2 (Trop-2) - a cell-surface glycoprotein highly expressed in many epithelial tumors - and delivers the active metabolite of irinotecan SN-38 to Trop-2-positive tumor cells. We evaluated Trop-2 expression in endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EC) tissues and the activity of SG against primary poorly differentiated EC cell lines and xenografts. Trop-2 expression was assessed in 143 formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded tumors and seven primary tumor cell lines by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry, respectively. Cell viability of primary tumor cell lines was assessed following exposure to SG, or control antibodies. Antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC) against Trop-2-positive and Trop-2-negative EC cell lines was measured in vitro using 4-h chromium release assays. A Trop-2-positive EC xenograft model was used to determine the in vivo activity of SG. Moderate-to-strong staining was detected in 84% (120/143) of EC samples, whereas 43% (3/7) of the primary EC cell lines tested overexpressed Trop-2. EC cell lines overexpressing Trop-2 were significantly more sensitive to SG compared to control ADC (P = 0.014 and P = 0.005). Both SG and the unconjugated parental antibody hRS7 mediated high ADCC against Trop-2-positive cell lines. Moreover, SG induced significant bystander killing of Trop-2-negative tumors cocultured with Trop-2-positive tumors. In the xenograft model, intravenous administration of SG twice weekly for three weeks was well tolerated and demonstrated impressive tumor growth inhibition against poorly differentiated, chemotherapy-resistant EC xenografts (P = 0.011). In summary, SG is a novel ADC with remarkable preclinical activity against poorly differentiated EC cell lines overexpressing Trop-2. These findings warrant future clinical trials., (© 2020 The Authors. Published by FEBS Press and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To compare aromatase inhibitors (AIs) with progestins as adjuvant hormonal therapy(AHT) for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (LGESSs)., Methods: We reviewed cases with LGESS at our institution from 1984 to 2017. Disease recurrence and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed among patients who received AI, progestins, or no AHT., Results: Among 39 patients with LGESS, 18 received progestins, 13 received AI, and 8 received no AHT. Thirty patients had stage I disease, and 9 had stage II to IV disease. All underwent hysterectomies. Disease recurred in 70% (7/10) of stage I patients who received no AHT, compared to 14.3% (1/7) receiving AI, and 7.7% (1/13) receiving progestins ( P = .003). Among stage I patients taking AI, mean RFS was 153.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 110-195.6) versus 306.2 months (95% CI: 259.7-352.6) for progestin patients and 90.8 months (95% CI: 56.8-124.9) for those who received no AHT. In stage II to IV patients, mean RFS was 148.5 months (95% CI: 148.5-148.5) and 120.8 months (95% CI: 55.8-185.9) for the AI and progestin groups, respectively. All stage II to IV patients received AHT. Among stage I patients, median follow-up time for RFS was 159.1 months for progestin patients, 52.6 months for AI, and 53.1 months for those who received no AHT. Of this, 69% of stage I patients taking progestins reduced/stopped treatment prematurely due to side effects. None of the patients taking AI discontinued treatment early., Conclusion: Aromatase inhibitor is associated with longer RFS in patients with advanced LGESS, is better tolerated than progestins, and can be primary AHT for LGESS.

Aims: To compare baseline risk factors for type 1 vs. 2 endometrial cancers and analyze these risk factors for association with overall survival and time to recurrence., Methods: Retrospective review of 816 consecutive endometrial cancer cases was conducted with diagnosis from January 2005 to December 2010 and clinical course until 2016. Risk factors, treatment, recurrence, and death were compared using 2 sample t tests, χ2 test and Cox Regression models., Results: There were 550 cases of type 1 and 266 cases of type 2 cancer. Patients with type 2 disease were older (p < 0.001), less obese (p = 0.03), non-white (p < 0.001), and menopausal (p = 0.02). There was no difference in use of oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), smoking, or major cardiovascular disease. Cox Regression models showed that type 2 disease (p < 0.001) and advanced stage (p = 0.001) were associated with recurrence., Conclusions: Consistent with previous literature, our analysis found that type 2 cancer is more common in non-white, older, and less obese patients and associated with higher mortality and recurrence. However, inconsistent with previous literature, we found no association between type 2 cancer and diabetes mellitus or use of HRT. These factors should be considered when approaching patients with endometrial cancer., (© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Purpose: Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is a rare and aggressive variant of endometrial cancer. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) studies have recently reported c-Myc gene amplification in a large number of USCs, suggesting c-Myc as a potential therapeutic target. We investigated the activity of novel BET bromodomain inhibitors (GS-5829 and GS-626510, Gilead Sciences Inc.) and JQ1 against primary USC cultures and USC xenografts. Experimental Design: We evaluated c-Myc expression by qRT-PCR in a total of 45 USCs including fresh-frozen tumor tissues and primary USC cell lines. We also performed IHC and Western blot experiments in 8 USC tumors. USC cultures were evaluated for sensitivity to GS-5829, GS-626510, and JQ1 in vitro using proliferation, viability, and apoptosis assays. Finally, the in vivo activity of GS-5829, GS-626510, and JQ1 was studied in USC-ARK1 and USC-ARK2 mouse xenografts. Results: Fresh-frozen USC and primary USC cell lines overexpressed c-Myc when compared with normal tissues ( P = 0.0009 and 0.0083, respectively). High c-Myc expression was found in 7 of 8 of primary USC cell lines tested by qRT-PCR and 5 of 8 tested by IHC. In vitro experiments demonstrated high sensitivity of USC cell lines to the exposure to GS-5829, GS-626510, and JQ1 with BET inhibitors causing a dose-dependent decrease in the phosphorylated levels of c-Myc and a dose-dependent increase in caspase activation (apoptosis). In comparative in vivo experiments, GS-5829 and/or GS-626510 were found more effective than JQ1 at the concentrations/doses used in decreasing tumor growth in both USC-ARK1 and USC-ARK2 mouse xenograft models. Conclusions: GS-5829 and GS-626510 may represent novel, highly effective therapeutics agents against recurrent/chemotherapy-resistant USC-overexpressing c-Myc. Clinical studies with GS-5829 in patients with USC harboring chemotherapy-resistant disease are warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 24(19); 4845-53. ©2018 AACR ., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Grade 3 endometrioid and uterine serous carcinomas (USC) account for the vast majority of endometrial cancer deaths. The purpose of this study was to determine folic acid receptor alpha (FRα) expression in these biologically aggressive (type II) endometrial cancers and evaluate FRα as a targetable receptor for IMGN853 (mirvetuximab soravtansine). The expression of FRα was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and flow cytometry in 90 endometrioid and USC samples. The in vitro cytotoxic activity and bystander effect were studied in primary uterine cancer cell lines expressing differential levels of FRα. In vivo antitumor efficacy of IMGN853 was evaluated in xenograft/patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Semiquantitative IHC analysis indicated that 41% of the USC patients overexpress FRα. Further, overexpression of FRα (i.e., 2+) was detected via flow cytometry in 22% (2/9) of primary endometrioid and in 27% (3/11) of primary USC cell lines. Increased cytotoxicity was seen with IMGN853 treatment compared with control in 2+ expressing uterine tumor cell lines. In contrast, tumor cell lines with low FRα showed no difference when exposed to IMGN853 versus control. IMGN853 induced bystander killing of FRα = 0 tumor cells. In an endometrioid xenograft model (END(K)265), harboring 2+ FRα, IMGN853 treatment showed complete resolution of tumors ( P < 0.001). Treatment with IMGN853 in the USC PDX model (BIO(K)1), expressing 2+ FRα, induced twofold increase in median survival ( P < 0.001). IMGN853 shows impressive antitumor activity in biologically aggressive FRα 2+ uterine cancers. These preclinical data suggest that patients with chemotherapy resistant/recurrent endometrial cancer overexpressing FRα may benefit from this treatment. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(5); 1003-11. ©2018 AACR ., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Objective: Up to 12% of all endometrial-carcinomas (EC) harbor DNA-polymerase-ε-(POLE) mutations. It is currently unknown whether the favorable prognosis of POLE-mutated EC is derived from their low metastatic capability, extraordinary number of somatic mutations thus imparting immunogenicity, or a high sensitivity to chemotherapy., Methods: Polymerase-chain-reaction-amplification and Sanger-sequencing were used to test for POLE exonuclease-domain-mutations (exons 9-14) 131 EC. Infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes (TIL) and PD-1-expression in POLE-mutated vs POLE wild-type EC was studied by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the correlations between survival and molecular features were investigated. Finally, primary POLE-mutated and POLE-wild-type EC cell lines were established and compared in-vitro for their sensitivity to chemotherapy., Results: Eleven POLE-mutated EC (8.5%) were identified. POLE-mutated tumors were associated with improved progression-free-survival (P<0.05) and displayed increased numbers of CD4+ (44.5 vs 21.8; P=0.001) and CD8+ (32.8 vs 13.5; P<0.001) TILs when compared to wild-type POLE EC. PD-1 receptor was overexpressed in TILs from POLE-mutated vs wild-type-tumors (81% vs 28%; P<0.001). Primary POLE tumor cell lines were significantly more resistant to platinum-chemotherapy in-vitro when compared to POLE-wild-type tumors (P<0.004)., Conclusions: POLE ultra-mutated EC are heavily infiltrated with CD4+/CD8+ TIL, overexpress PD-1 immune-check-point (i.e., features consistent with chronic antigen-exposure), and have a better prognosis when compared to other molecular subtypes of EC patients. POLE-mutated tumor-cell lines are resistant to platinum-chemotherapy in-vitro suggesting that the better prognosis of POLE-patients is not secondary to a higher sensitivity to chemotherapy but likely linked to enhanced immunogenicity., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The management of endometrial carcinoma no longer amenable to treatment with surgery or radiotherapy has not improved significantly with modern chemotherapy. Alternative therapeutic options are desperately needed., Experimental Design: We describe 2 heavily pretreated patients with recurrent disease refractory to surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy who were treated with the anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab., Results: Patient #1 harbored an ultra-mutated tumor (mutation load/MB = 117.3, total mutations = 4,660) driven by mutation in the exonuclease domain of the DNA polymerase ε gene. Patient #2 harbored a hyper-mutated tumor (mutation load/MB = 33.5, total mutations = 1,037) due to a germinal MSH6 gene mutation. Both patients demonstrated a remarkable clinical response to the anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab. Patients' clinical responses remain unchanged at the time of the writing of this report, with no grade 3 or higher side effects reported to date., Conclusions: Anti-PD-1 inhibitors represent a novel treatment option for recurrent/metastatic, ultra/hyper-mutated human tumors refractory to salvage treatment. Clin Cancer Res; 22(23); 5682-7. ©2016 AACRSee related commentary by Piulats and Matias-Guiu, p. 5623., (©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is a rare but aggressive subtype of endometrial cancer. Although it represents only 10% of all endometrial cancer cases, USC accounts for up to 40% of all endometrial cancer-related recurrences and subsequent deaths. With such a dismal prognosis, there is an expanding role for novel targeted approaches in the treatment of USC. Recent whole-exome sequencing studies have demonstrated gain of function of the HER2/NEU gene, as well as driver mutations in the PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR and cyclin E/FBXW7 oncogenic pathways in a large number of USCs. The results emphasize the relevance of these novel therapeutic targets for biologic therapy of USC, which will be reviewed in this article.

Introduction: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the developed world and is increasing in incidence. While the mainstay of treatment for EC is surgery followed by chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, the available pharmacotherapies are rapidly and constantly evolving. Understanding these new therapies is an important part of the research and clinical care of women with EC. A review of available literature from MEDLINE (1879-2015) was conducted for the historic treatments and current therapies available for endometrial tumors., Areas Covered: This article reviews the current conventional therapies and discusses novel therapeutic agents, some of which are available to clinicians while others are currently being investigated in the preclinical setting., Expert Opinion: Genomic and immunohistochemical characterization of endometrial cancer may soon be the best approach for the identification of aggressive forms of tumor. Targeted therapies will soon be standard in the management of endometrial cancer.

Objective: Around 7-10% of endometrial carcinomas are characterized by polymerase-ε-(POLE) exonuclease-domain-mutations, an ultra-mutated-phenotype and a favorable prognosis. It is currently unknown whether POLE ultra-mutated-tumors are more immunogenic when compared to the other groups of endometrial cancers., Methods: We used autologous-dendritic-cells (DC) pulsed with whole-tumor-extracts to assess the level of CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell-activation induced by POLE-ultramutated (+) and POLE wild-type (-) endometrial cancer cells in vitro. T-lymphocyte-proliferations were evaluated using CFSE and/or ([3H])thymidine-incorporation-assays while the ability to specifically kill autologous-tumor-cells by cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte (CTL) was tested in standard 4-h-(51)Cr-cytotoxicity-assays. In order to correlate cytotoxic activity and proliferation by CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes, respectively, with a particular lymphoid subset, two-color-flow-cytometric analysis of intracellular-cytokine-expression (IFN-γ vs IL-4) at the single cell level was also performed., Results: DC-pulsed with tumor extracts were able to induce CTL-responses against autologous-tumor-cells in both POLE (+) and POLE (-) cancer patients (P=0.305). These CD8+ T-cell-populations were cytotoxic against tumor-cells but they did not lyse PHA-stimulated-autologous-lymphocytes or autologous-EBV-transformed-lymphoblastoid-control-cell-lines. In contrast, only POLE (+) tumor-lysate-pulsed-DC were able to induce significant proliferation and high IFN-γ expression (i.e., Th1-cytokine-bias) in autologous in vitro DC-stimulated CD4+ T-cells as well as naïve CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells from patients-peripheral-blood (P<0.05)., Conclusions: POLE ultra-mutated-tumors are significantly more immunogenic when compared to POLE (-) tumors, in particular to the helper arm of the immune system. These data lend support to the hypothesis that the better prognosis of patients with POLE (+) tumors may at least in part be linked to their enhanced immunogenicity., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the short- and long-term outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent robotic-assisted staging and to analyze disease recurrence and recurrence-free survival (RFS)., Materials and Methods: The charts of all consecutive patients with endometrial cancer who underwent robotic surgery from March 2007 to October 2012 were analyzed. Patients with follow-up less than 12 months after surgery were censored from the RFS analysis., Results: Mean (SD) age for the 364 patients was 63.6 (10) years, and mean (SD) BMI was 34.8 (10.1) kg/m. Conversions were in 3 (0.8%) of 364 cases. The mean (SD) operative time was 162.3 (54.6) minutes. Mean (SD) postoperative hospitalization was 1.6 (1.9) days. Histology included 80.5% endometrioid and 19.5% clear cell, serous, and carcinosarcomas. Mean (SD) pelvic and paraaortic lymph node counts were 15.9 (8.2) and 3.6 (4.3), respectively. Metastatic disease was diagnosed in 58 (16%) of 364 patients. The median follow-up was 29.3 months. The recurrence rates were 4.1% for the patients with endometrioid carcinoma and 14.1% for nonendometrioid histologies. Recurrences in patients with BMI less than 30 kg/m accounted for 68.2% of all recurrences (15/22 patients). The rest of recurrences (7/22 patients, 31.8%) were in obese patients. Moreover, when analyzed for each histologic subtype, recurrence rates were consistently higher for patients with BMI less than 30 kg/m when compared with patients with BMI greater than 30 kg/m. The 3-year overall survival was 98.2%, and the 3-year RFS was 92%., Conclusions: Obesity and morbid obesity did not affect adversely the operative outcomes for patients with endometrial cancer who were operated on using the robotic system. The recurrence rates were lower for patients with BMI greater than 30 kg/m compared with patients with BMI less than 30 kg/m for both endometrioid and nonendometrioid cancers.

Context: In the era of targeted cancer therapy, there is growing interest in developing novel therapeutic strategies against endometrial carcinoma, especially its most biologically aggressive variant, serous adenocarcinoma. Several publications have demonstrated that a significant proportion of uterine serous carcinomas show HER2 overexpression and/or amplification, suggesting that HER2 may be a promising therapeutic target. Case reports have already shown clinical response to trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 antibody against HER2, and patients are currently being enrolled in a multi-institutional prospective randomized trial to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of trastuzumab., Objective: To review current data on HER2 testing and targeted therapy against HER2/neu in endometrial carcinoma., Data Sources: Review of the literature and personal experience of the authors., Conclusions: Parallel to the clinical studies, there is a need to develop standardized criteria for HER2 testing in endometrial carcinoma that reflect the unique biological and pathogenetic features of these tumors and correlate with clinical response to therapy. This article presents a comprehensive review of the current state of HER2-based therapy and HER2 testing in endometrial carcinoma.

Objectives: Preclinical data suggest that mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors may potentiate the efficacy of topotecan. We evaluated the optimal schedule of oral topotecan in combination with everolimus in patients with endometrial cancer., Methods: Women with a history of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer were enrolled. Escalating dose of oral topotecan (1.5 mg/m, 1.9 mg/m, and 2.3 mg/m) daily on days 1 to 5 and everolimus (5 mg every other day, 5 mg daily, and 10 mg daily) were administered in a 21-day cycle. A "run-in" treatment of topotecan daily for 5 days followed by everolimus for 7 days (4-7 doses depending on dose level) was administered for the purpose of pharmacokinetic assessments., Results: Ten patients were enrolled on the study, and 9 were evaluable for safety analysis. A total of 28 cycles were administered (range, 1-10 cycles per patient). The patients had a median age of 73 years (range, 42-79 years). Previous lines of chemotherapy were 1 (n = 2), 2 (n = 5), 3 (n = 2), and 4 (n = 1). Seven patients had previous vaginal brachytherapy, and 2 had pelvic external beam radiation therapy. The median number of cycles (including cycle 1) is 2 (range, 1-10). Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in 3 patients (1 patient treated with 1.9-mg/m topotecan and 5-mg everolimus given every other day as well as 2 patients treated with 1.9-mg/m topotecan and 5-mg of everolimus daily) and included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Seven patients were evaluable for response. Stable disease was the best response in 3 patients who completed the 3, 4, and 10 cycles each., Conclusions: The dose-limiting toxicity for the combination of oral topotecan and everolimus was myelosuppression. The maximum tolerated dose was topotecan 1.9 mg/m on days 1 to 5 in combination with oral everolimus 5 mg every other day. Administration of higher dose of each agent in combination was limited because of overlapping myelosuppression.

HER2 overexpression and/or amplification have been reported in endometrial serous carcinoma, suggesting that HER2 may be a promising therapeutic target. However, there is considerable variation in the reported rates of HER2 overexpression and amplification, likely--at least in part--resulting from variability in the testing methods, interpretation, and scoring criteria used. Unlike in breast and gastric cancer, currently there are no established guidelines for HER2 testing in endometrial carcinoma. A total of 108 endometrial carcinoma cases--85 pure serous carcinomas and 23 mixed endometrial carcinomas with serous component--were identified over a 4-year period. All H&E and HER2 immunohistochemical slides were reviewed and HER2 FISH results (available on 52 cases) were retrieved from pathology reports. HER2 immunohistochemical scores were assigned according to the FDA criteria and the current breast ASCO/CAP scoring criteria. Clinical information was retrieved from the patients' medical records. Thirty-eight cases (35%) showed HER2 overexpression and/or gene amplification, 20 of which (53%) had significant heterogeneity of protein expression by immunohistochemistry. Lack of apical membrane staining resulting in a lateral/basolateral staining pattern was observed in the majority of HER2-positive tumors. Five of the HER2-positive cases (13%) demonstrated discrepant immunohistochemical scores when using the FDA versus ASCO/CAP scoring system. The overall concordance rate between HER2 immunohistochemistry and FISH was 75% (39/52) when using the FDA criteria, compared with 81% (42/52) by the ASCO/CAP scoring system. In conclusion, in this largest comprehensive study, 35% of endometrial serous carcinoma harbors HER2 protein overexpression and/or gene amplification, over half of which demonstrate significant heterogeneity of protein expression. The current breast ASCO/CAP scoring criteria provide the highest concordance between immunohistochemistry and FISH. Assessment of HER2 immunohistochemistry on multiple tumor sections or sections with large tumor areas is recommended, due to the significant heterogeneity of HER2 protein expression.

Objective: To evaluate PIK3CA mutational status and c-erbB2 gene amplification in a series of primary uterine serous carcinomas (USC) cell lines. To assess the efficacy of GDC-0980, a potent inhibitor of Class I PI3 kinase and mTOR kinase (TORC1/2), against primary USC harboring HER2/neu gene amplification and/or PIK3CA mutations., Study Design: Twenty-two primary USC cell lines were evaluated for c-erbB2 oncogene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays and for PIK3CA gene mutations by direct DNA sequencing of exons 9 and 20. In vitro sensitivity to GDC-0980 was evaluated by flow-cytometry-based viability and proliferation assays. Downstream cellular responses to GDC-0980 were assessed by measuring phosphorylation of the 4-EBP1 protein by flow-cytometry., Results: Five of 22 (22.7%) USC cell lines contained oncogenic PIK3CA mutations although 9 (40.9%) harbored c-erbB2 gene amplification by FISH. GDC-0980 caused a strong differential growth inhibition in FISH+ USC when compared with FISH- (GDC-0980 IC50 mean ± SEM = 0.29 ± 0.05 μM in FISH+ vs 1.09 ± 0.20 μM in FISH- tumors, P = .02). FISH+ USC harboring PIK3CA mutations were significantly more sensitive to GDC-0980 exposure when compared with USC cell lines harboring wild-type PIK3CA (P = .03). GDC-0980 growth-inhibition was associated with a significant and dose-dependent decline in phosphorylated 4-EBP1 levels., Conclusion: Oncogenic PIK3CA mutations and c-erbB2 gene amplification may represent biomarkers to identify patients harboring USC who may benefit most from the use of GDC-0980., (Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is a highly aggressive variant of endometrial cancer with distinct molecular pathogenesis. This review summarizes the rationale behind current clinical approaches, as well as advances made in 2012 toward the elucidation of underlying pathway aberrations and development of targeted therapies that exploit these unique characteristics., Recent Findings: Within the last year, exome-wide analyses have highlighted key mutations to guide rational drug design. The PI3/AKT/mTOR pathway and regulators of cell cycle such as cyclin E/F-box proteins appear to be particularly important. Understanding the epithelial to mesenchymal transition may explain the aggressive pattern of spread frequently observed in this disease. There is heightened evidence for heritable syndromes in association with USC. Conflicting retrospective data continue to emerge regarding optimal therapy, especially for early-stage disease, although prospective studies are underway. Immunotherapies targeting Her2/Neu and vascular endothelial growth factor remain an area of active research. Upregulation of class III β-tubulin observed in paclitaxel-resistant disease may identify candidates for therapy with novel microtubule-stabilizing agents such as epothilones., Summary: There is an expanding role for contemporary novel approaches in the treatment of USC. The results of clinical investigations using new target antigens, epothilones, and small molecule inhibitors are eagerly awaited.

Objective: To compare the outcomes of 155 cases of endometrial cancer who had robot-assisted surgical staging to 150 open cases., Methods: Retrospective chart review of cases of endometrial cancer that underwent staging two different ways by two surgeons at an academic institution., Results: Mean age was 62.4 years in the robotic arm and 65 (P=0.04) in the open arm. Mean body mass index was 34.5 Kg/m(2) in the robotic arm and 33 Kg/m(2) in the open arm (P=0.2). Pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection were performed in 94.8% and 67.7% of the robotic cases versus 95.3% and 74% of the open cases, respectively. Mean operative time was 127 min in the robotic arm, and 141 min in the open arm (P=0.0001). Mean lymph node count was 20.3 in the robotic arm, and 20 in the open arm (P=0.567). Mean estimated blood loss was 119 ml in the robotic arm and 185 in the open arm (P=0.015). Mean hospital stay was 1.5 days in the robotic arm, and 4 days in the open arm (P=0.0001). The incidence of postoperative ileus (0.6% vs. 10.7%, P=0.0001), infections (5.2% vs. 24%, P=0.0001), anemia/transfusion (1.3% vs. 7.7%, P=0.005), and cardiopulmonary complications (3.2% vs.14.7%, P=0.003) was significantly lower in the robotic arm vs. the open arm. There was one death in the robotic arm attributed to pre-existing cardiac condition., Conclusion: Robotic-assisted staging reaps the benefits of minimally invasive surgery without compromising the adequacy of the procedure. Dedication to the technique shortens the operative time., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common female genital malignancy in the USA. Most carcinomas arising from the uterus are estrogen dependent and are associated with obesity and hypertension. They are designated type I ECs and typically, due to their early diagnosis secondary to postmenopausal bleeding, have a good prognosis. By contrast, type II ECs develop in older patients, are not hormone dependent and are responsible for most recurrences and deaths from EC. Uterine serous cancer constitutes up to 10% of all endometrial tumors, and represents the most biologically aggressive variant of type II EC. This article will describe the most salient molecular markers that have been identified in uterine serous cancer, thus far with emphasis on the use of erbB2 (HER2/neu) as the first of a series of therapeutic markers for the treatment of this highly-aggressive subset of ECs.

Objective: We evaluated the expression of human trophoblast cell surface marker (Trop-2) in endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) and the potential application of hRS7, a humanized monoclonal anti-Trop-2 antibody, as a therapeutic agent against poorly differentiated EEC., Methods: Trop-2 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 131 EEC with different degrees of differentiation and 32 normal endometrial controls (NEC). Trop-2 expression was also evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry in 3 primary EEC cell lines derived from patients harboring poorly differentiated EEC. Finally, the sensitivity of grade 3 EEC cell lines to hRS7 antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity was tested in standard 5-hour Cr release assays., Results: Trop-2 expression was detected in 126 (96.2%) of 131 EEC samples. Tumor tissues showed markedly increased Trop-2 positivity compared with NEC (P = 0.001). Trop-2 expression was significantly higher in all grades of EEC versus NEC. Grade 3 tumors displayed significantly stronger Trop-2 immunostaining compared with grade 1 EEC (P = 0.01). High Trop-2 expression by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry was found in 1 grade 3 EEC primary cell line (EEC-ARK-1). Unlike Trop-2-negative EEC cell lines, EEC-ARK-1 was found highly sensitive to hRS7-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in vitro (range of killing, 33.9%-50.6%; P = 0.004). Human serum did not significantly inhibit hRS7-mediated cytotoxicity against EEC-ARK-1 (P = 0.773)., Conclusions: Trop-2 is highly expressed in EEC, and its expression is significantly higher in poorly differentiated EEC when compared with well-differentiated EEC. Primary grade 3 EECs overexpressing Trop-2 are highly sensitive to hRS7-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro. hRS7 may represent a novel therapeutic agent for the treatment of high-grade EEC refractory to standard treatment modalities.

Background: The authors investigated the expression of serum amyloid A (SAA) in endometrial endometrioid carcinoma and evaluated its potential as a serum biomarker., Methods: SAA gene and protein expression levels were evaluated in endometrial endometrioid carcinoma and normal endometrial tissues, by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and flow cytometry. SAA concentration in 194 serum samples from 50 healthy women, 42 women with benign diseases, and 102 patients including 49 grade 1, 38 grade 2, and 15 grade 3 endometrial endometrioid carcinoma was also studied by a sensitive bead-based immunoassay., Results: SAA gene expression levels were significantly higher in endometrial endometrioid carcinoma when compared with normal endometrial tissues (mean copy number by real-time PCR = 182 vs 1.9; P = .001). IHC revealed diffuse cytoplasmic SAA protein staining in poorly differentiated endometrial endometrioid carcinoma tissues. High intracellular levels of SAA were identified in primary endometrial endometrioid carcinoma cell lines evaluated by flow cytometry, and SAA was found to be actively secreted in vitro. SAA concentrations (microg/mL) had medians of 6.0 in normal healthy women and 6.0 in patients with benign disease (P = .92). In contrast, SAA values in the serum of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma patients had a median of 23.7, significantly higher than those of the healthy group (P = .001) and benign group (P = .001). Patients harboring G3 endometrial endometrioid carcinoma were found to have SAA concentrations significantly higher than those of G1/G2 patients., Conclusions: SAA is not only a liver-secreted protein, but is also an endometrial endometrioid carcinoma cell product. SAA is expressed and actively secreted by G3 endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, and it is present in high concentration in the serum of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma patients. SAA may represent a novel biomarker for endometrial endometrioid carcinoma to monitor disease recurrence and response to therapy.

Recurrent/metastatic endometrial adenocarcinoma that is not amenable to cure with local or regional therapy and/or chemotherapy represents a discouraging clinical entity for the clinician. We report the case of 58-year-old woman with recurrent endometrial carcinoma that was resistant to chemotherapy that was treated successfully with the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole.

Objective: To study the effect of trastuzumab in patients with progressive or recurrent metastatic endometrial carcinoma shown by immunohistochemistry to overexpress the HER2/neu receptor., Methods: Disease progression was examined in 2 patients who met the study criteria, had c-erbB2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and were treated with trastuzumab following radiation treatment and/or salvage chemotherapy., Results: The clinical responses to trastuzumab as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy were confirmed in both patients by serial CT scans and serum CA-125 evaluations. These patients with progressive or recurrent metastatic disease experienced relief from their symptoms and prolonged survival with no significant toxicity observed., Conclusion: Trastuzumab may be a viable therapeutic option as single agent or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic endometrial carcinomas overexpressing HER2/neu.

Purpose: To evaluate and compare autocrine expression and production of interleukin-6 (IL-6), a pleiotropic cytokine involved in the resistance to cytotoxic agents and inhibition of anti-tumor immune function in endometrial carcinoma in vitro as well as in vivo., Patients and Methods: IL-6 gene expression levels were evaluated in twenty-four primary endometrial tumors including 14 endometrioid carcinomas (EC) and 10 uterine serous papillary carcinoma (USPC) as well as in normal control endometrial cells (NEC) by real-time PCR. Secretion of IL-6 protein by 6 primary endometrial tumor cultures including USPC and EC was measured using a sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in vitro. Finally, IL-6 concentration in 71 serum samples including 20 apparently healthy women, 19 women with benign abdominal diseases, 19 women with primary EC, and 13 USPC patients was studied., Results: IL-6 gene expression levels were significantly higher in USPC when compared to EC (mean copy number by RT-PCR = 313 +/- 55 vs. 53 +/- 11, USPC vs. EC, respectively: P < 0.01). IL-6 serum concentrations between normal healthy females (range 0.01-21.23 pg/ml; mean 3.1 pg/ml) and benign disease patients (range 0.01-95.77 pg/ml; mean 13.07 pg/ml) were not statistically different. In contrast, significantly higher levels of IL-6 were detected in both patients with EC (range 2.86-82.13 pg/ml; mean 20.43 pg/ml) and patients with UPSC (range 16.3-500.1 pg/ml; mean 125.7 pg/ml) when compared to the healthy females (P < 0.01), with a mean serum IL-6 level in USPC patients 6.1-fold higher when compared to EC patients (P < 0.03). Accordingly, higher levels of IL-6 secretion were noted in primary USPC cell lines (mean 3121 pg/ml, range between 1099 and 5017 pg/ml/10(5) cells/48 h) when compared to primary EC (mean 88, range between 19 and 112 pg/ml/10(5) cells/48 h) (P < 0.01) in vitro., Conclusions: IL-6 is highly expressed in USPC, and it is released in high concentration in the serum of USPC patients. IL-6 may be a novel biomarker for USPC. Drugs used to inhibit the expression of IL-6 or the IL-6 signal transduction pathway may potentially be highly beneficial in USPC.

In North America, endometrial cancer is the most prevalent cancer of the female genital tract. On the basis of clinical and histologic variables, two main types of endometrial cancer have been described: Type I tumors, which are usually well differentiated and endometrioid in histology and account for the majority of cases; and Type II, which are poorly differentiated tumors, often with serous papillary or clear cell histology. Due to the early declaration of the disease by vaginal bleeding, approximately 80% of endometrial cancers are diagnosed at an early stage. Total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without lymph node dissection remains the cornerstone of treatment. Tumor stage, histologic grade and depth of myometrial invasion are the most important prognostic factors. If myometrial invasion to 50% or more of the myometrial width and/or grade 2 or 3 histology is present, pelvic radiotherapy is indicated to reduce the risk of pelvic recurrence. Postoperative radiation therapy may improve local control but does not affect survival for Stage I endometrial cancer patients. Systemic chemotherapy is typically reserved for women with disseminated primary disease or extrapelvic recurrence. Although the combination of cisplatin plus doxorubicin is commonly used, carboplatin plus paclitaxel represents an efficacious, low-toxicity regimen for managing advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. Recently, a significant percentage of Type II uterine tumors have been found to overexpress the epidermal growth factor Type II receptor. Anti-HER-2/neu-targeted therapy might be a novel and attractive therapeutic strategy in patients harboring this biologically aggressive variant of endometrial cancer.

Objective: We sought to identify effective chemotherapy regimens against uterine serous papillary adenocarcinoma (USPC). Study Design: Six USPC, half of which overexpress HER-2/neu at 3+ level, were evaluated for growth rate and in vitro sensitivity to 14 single-agent chemotherapies and 5 combinations by ChemoFx (Precision Therapeutics Inc, Pittsburgh, PA). Results: Cell lines overexpressing HER-2/neu showed higher proliferation when compared to low HER-2/neu-expressing cell lines and a lower half maximum inhibitory concentration (IC50) when exposed to the majority of single-agent chemotherapies. High HER-2/neu expressors were more sensitive to platinum compounds, manifesting a 5.22-fold decrease in carboplatin-IC50 (P = .005) and a 5.37-fold decrease in cisplatin-IC50 (P = .02). When all cell lines were analyzed as a group, chemotherapy agents tested demonstrated lower IC50 when used in combination than as individual agents. Conclusion: USPC overexpressing HER-2/neu display greater in vitro sensitivity to platinum compounds when compared to low HER-2/neu expressors. Higher proliferative capability rather than increased drug resistance may be responsible for the adverse prognosis associated with HER-2/neu overexpression in USPC. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: To evaluate c-erbB2 gene amplification in a series of primary uterine serous carcinoma (USC) cell lines. To assess the efficacy of AZD8055, a novel dual mTORC1/2 inhibitor against primary HER2/neu amplified vs HER2/neu not amplified USC cell lines. Methods: Twenty-two primary USC cell lines were evaluated for c-erbB2 oncogene amplification by FISH assays. In vitro sensitivity to AZD8055 was evaluated by flow-cytometry-based viability and proliferation assays. Cell cycle profile and downstream cellular responses to AZD8055 were assessed by measuring the DNA content of cells and by phosphorylation of the S6 protein by flow-cytometry. Results: Nine of 22 (40.9%) USC cell lines demonstrated c-erbB2 gene amplification by FISH. AZD8055 caused a strong differential growth inhibition in USC cell lines, with high HER-2/neu-expressors demonstrating significantly higher sensitivity when compared to low HER-2/neu-expressors (AZD-8055 IC50 mean±SEM=0.27±0.05μM in c-erbB2 amplified versus 1.67±0.68μM in c-erbB2 not amplified tumors, P=0.03). AZD8055 growth-inhibition was associated with a significant and dose-dependent increase in the percentage of cells blocked in the G0/G1 cell cycle phase and a dose-dependent decline in pS6 levels in both c-erbB2 amplified vs c-erbB2 not amplified USC cell lines. Conclusions: AZD8055 may represent a novel targeted therapeutic agent in patients harboring advanced/recurrent/refractory USC. c-erbB2 gene amplification may represent a biomarker to identify USC patients who may benefit most from the use of AZD8055. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: To compare the in vitro sensitivity/resistance to patupilone versus paclitaxel in uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas (CS). Methods: Five primary carcinosarcoma cell lines, two from uterine and three of ovarian origin, were evaluated for growth rate and tested for their in vitro sensitivity/resistance to patupilone versus paclitaxel by MTS assays. To identify potential mechanisms underlying the differential sensitivity/resistance to patupilone, expression levels of β-tubulin III (TUBB3) were determined with quantitative-real-time-polymerase-chain-reaction (q-RT-PCR) in primary uterine and ovarian CS cell lines and in 26 uterine and 9 ovarian CS fresh-frozen-tissues. Results: No appreciable difference in sensitivity to patupilone versus paclitaxel was noted in ovarian CS cell lines, or when uterine and ovarian CS cell lines were compared in their response to paclitaxel. In contrast, uterine CS cell lines were found to be significantly more sensitive to patupilone than to paclitaxel (P<0.002) and demostrated lower IC50s to patupilone (range 0.76–0.93nM) when compared to ovarian CS (range 1.9–3.4 nM, p<0.05). Higher levels of TUBB3 were detected in uterine CS cell lines and fresh frozen tissues when compared to ovarian CS (P<0.05). Conclusions: Uterine CS cell lines are significantly more sensitive than ovarian CS cell lines to patupilone versus paclitaxel. High expression of TUBB3 is associated with sensitivity to patupilone in primary CS cell lines and may act as a genetic marker to predict chemotherapy efficacy. Patupilone may represent a promising drug in the treatment of this subset of rare but highly aggressive gynecological tumors. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: To compare the in vitro sensitivity/resistance to patupilone versus paclitaxel in uterine serous papillary carcinoma (USPC) with high versus low HER-2/neu expression. Methods: Six primary USPC cell lines, half of which overexpress HER-2/neu at a 3+ level, were evaluated for growth rate and tested for their in vitro sensitivity/resistance to patupilone versus paclitaxel by MTS assays. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to identify potential mechanisms underlying the differential sensitivity/resistance to patupilone versus paclitaxel in primary USPC cell lines. Results: Cell lines overexpressing HER-2/neu showed higher proliferation when compared to low HER-2/neu-expressing cell lines. Compared to low-expressing cell lines, high HER-2/neu expressors were significantly more sensitive to patupilone than to paclitaxel (P <0.0002). In contrast, there was no appreciable difference in sensitivity to patupilone versus paclitaxel in primary USPC cell lines with low HER-2/neu expression. Higher levels of β-tubulin III (TUBB3) and P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) were detected in USPC cell lines with high versus low HER-2/neu expression (P <0.05). Conclusions: USPC overexpressing HER-2/neu display greater in vitro sensitivity to patupilone and higher levels of the patupilone molecular target TUBB3 when compared to low HER-2/neu expressors. Due to the adverse prognosis associated with HER-2/neu overexpression in USPC patients, patupilone may represent a promising novel drug to combine to platinum compounds in this subset of aggressive endometrial tumors. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]