Search

Introduction: Dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma is an uncommon highly aggressive uterine tumor. It comprises 2 components: a well-differentiated, low-grade epithelial carcinoma and an undifferentiated carcinoma. The undifferentiated carcinoma frequently exhibits rhabdoid cytologic features. Many of these tumors are characterized by an aberrant switch/sucrose non-fermenting (SWI/SNF) complex. They may also exhibit aberrant expression of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins. Together, these play an important role in the pathogenesis and aggressive nature of the tumor., Material and Methods: We present a case of dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma in a 63-year-old female showing loss of expression of SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A, member 4 (SMARCA4/BRG1), and aberrant expression of MMR proteins. We also review the literature starting from the earliest recognition of this entity and the various studies done to explain its molecular pathogenesis and prognostic importance., Results and Conclusions: Recognition of SWI/SNF complex-deficient dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma is important as these tumors do not respond to platinum-based chemotherapy, and consideration of alternative therapies is often necessary. We also want to emphasize that though most of the studies have found MMR deficiency in the undifferentiated carcinoma component, it may be seen only in the low-grade, well-differentiated component, as observed in this case.

Mixed endometrial carcinoma (MEC) is defined as a tumor composed of two or more spatially distinct subtypes, at least one of which is serous or clear cell carcinoma. In this study, the clinicopathological features of 15 MEC cases containing a clear cell component (MEC-C) were investigated. The ages of patients ranged from 32 to 83 years (median, 61 years). The combinations of carcinoma components observed were endometrioid and clear cell in ten patients; endometrioid, clear cell and serous in three; and clear cell and serous in two. Immunohistochemically, nine had DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein deficiency (MMR-d), nine had loss of ARID1A and three cases had aberrant p53 expression. MMR-d and loss of ARID1A showed a strong correlation. Only one case showed both MMR-d and aberrant p53 expression. The patients with MMR-d were younger than those without MMR-d (median; 58 years vs. 71 years). Loss of ARID1A also showed significant predilection for younger women than ARID1A intact cases. In conclusion, MMR-d was observed in 60 % of MEC-C, showed predilection for young women, and was associated with ARID1A loss. In contrast, non- MMR-d MEC-C occurred in elder women and some tumors may associate with TP53 mutation. These findings suggest that MEC-C develop via two different molecular mechanisms and they are age-related events., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)

Mixed endometrial carcinomas are defined as a combination of 2 or more distinct histologic subtypes, one of which must be a type II tumor comprising at least 5% of the tumor volume. The oncogenesis of these tumors remains unclear, particularly in light of the increasingly appreciated morphologic overlap among subtypes, as well as evolving molecular data. We evaluated 8 cases of mixed endometrial carcinoma, including 4 endometrioid (EC)/serous (SC), 1 SC/clear cell (CC), and 3 EC/CC cases, to study the underlying molecular features and oncogenic mechanisms at play. Each component was analyzed by a targeted next-generation sequencing assay. All tumors shared mutations in both components. In 6 cases, one component showed additional mutations. Two EC/SC cases showed shared mutations and mutations unique to each component. When present, unique mutations were typically seen in the SC component, including variants in POLE and TP53, as well as potentially targetable genes DDR2, MAP2K1, and CCNE1. In EC/SC tumors, ERBB2 abnormalities were seen in 2 cases. EC/CC cases showed FGFR2 activating mutations in the EC component only. No fusion drivers were identified. Our data suggest that the majority of these tumors begin as a single clone and diverge along 2 pathways: (1) tumor progression, with one component showing additional mutations, and (2) tumor divergence, in which tumor components have both shared mutations and mutations unique to each component. In addition, the findings suggest a component of morphologic mimicry in these tumors. Our findings are clinically relevant since targetable mutations may be present in only one component of mixed tumors.

Endometrial carcinoma (EC), as described by Bokhman, has historically been classified as Type I (low-grade, hormone-dependant, young patients, good prognosis) or Type II (high-grade, hormone-independent, older patients, poor prognosis). This classification is no longer pragmatic, however, as EC is a much more heterogeneous disease. Four molecular subtypes of EC were identified by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and subsequent studies have demonstrated its utility in predicting prognosis. While endometrial serous carcinoma (ESC), the prototypical Type II EC, largely occurs in older women, younger women with ESC were not accounted for in the Bokhman model and were underrepresented in the TCGA study. We hypothesized that a subset of ESCs in young patients do not represent bona fide serous carcinomas but rather high-grade endometrioid carcinomas mimicking a serous phenotype. We identified ESCs and mixed endometrioid/serous carcinomas in women <60 years (n=37), and analyzed their clinical, morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics. Sixteen percent showed mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D) and 11% were diagnosed with Lynch syndrome. Additionally, 16% of cases tested harbored a hotspot POLE exonuclease domain mutation (POLE-EDM). Morphologically, 47% of tumors showed confirmatory endometrioid features, including atypical hyperplasia, a low-grade endometrioid carcinoma component, or squamous differentiation. Clinically, the overall survival in patients with MMR-D and POLE-EDM was significantly better than that of patients without these features (P=0.0329). In conclusion, ESCs in young patients comprise a heterogeneous group of tumors, demonstrating diverse clinical, immunohistochemical, morphologic, and molecular features which have implications for prognosis and adjuvant therapy.

Objective: KRAS mutations are frequently seen in malignancies with mucinous morphology. In our previous study, mucinous endometrial carcinomas were associated with a significantly higher frequency of KRAS mutations as compared with matched conventional endometrioid carcinomas. This study expands our previous report by exploring possible intratumoral heterogeneity for KRAS gene mutations in the mucinous components of mucinous carcinomas (MCs) and endometrioid carcinomas with significant mucinous differentiation (ECSMD) versus their associated "usual" endometrioid components., Materials and Methods: KRAS-positive cases from our previous report were studied, including 10 MCs and 10 ECSMDs. The specimens were microscopically dissected to separately isolate morphologically mucinous and endometrioid components. Direct DNA sequencing for KRAS mutations at codons 12 and 13 using capillary electrophoresis were performed., Results: KRAS mutations were detected in the endometrioid components of 8 (80%) of 10 MCs and 3 (30%) of 10 ECSMDs. The endometrioid component of the ECSMD group was less frequently associated with KRAS mutation than the endometrioid component of the MC group, even when the mucinous component of the same tumor contained a mutation; the difference is statistically significant (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: Our current study shows that intratumoral heterogeneity for KRAS gene mutation was associated with ECSMD, but less frequently with MC. It is possible that when the mucinous component predominates, qualifying for an MC, KRAS mutations appear to be widespread, irrespective of the mucinous or nonmucinous differentiation of the tumor cells. The findings suggest that multiple samples for KRAS tests may be useful, especially in endometrioid carcinoma with significant mucinous differentiation.

Recently, we reported 2 mixed endometrioid endometrial carcinomas with a "low-grade serous"-like component, which does not fit into any of the 4 molecular groups described by The Cancer Genome Atlas. To understand the nature of these tumors, we have done an immunohistochemical and molecular genetic study of these 2 cases and added a third case. Immunoreactivity for p53, ER, Ki67, WT1, MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6 was assessed. Targeted next-generation sequencing for somatic mutations, including genes commonly implicated in carcinogenesis including TP53, KRAS, and PIK3CA, and Sanger sequencing for PTEN and POLE were also performed. All patients were nulliparous and had morbid obesity. Their tumors showed a micropapillary component that resembled that of ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma and merged with villoglandular endometrioid carcinoma. The invasive tumor glands exhibited a microcystic, elongated, or fragmented pattern and contained psammoma bodies. Two tumors showed aberrant p53 expression, and all 3 were positive for ER. All showed KRAS mutations, and TP53 mutations were found in 2 cases. One patient developed peritoneal carcinomatosis, one patient is alive with disease, and another died of a brain tumor. The third patient, whose tumor was confined to the uterus (stage IA), is alive without evidence of disease, but she has been followed for only 6 months. Mixed endometrial carcinomas with a "low-grade" serous-like component exhibit a morphologic spectrum of endometrioid and serous differentiation with microcystic, elongated, or fragmented features; ER expression; KRAS and TP53 mutations; and aggressive behavior., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Mixed endometrial carcinoma refers to a tumor that comprises 2 or more distinct histotypes. We studied 18 mixed-type endometrial carcinomas-11 mixed serous and low-grade endometrioid carcinomas (SC/EC), 5 mixed clear cell and low-grade ECs (CCC/EC), and 2 mixed CCC and SCs (CCC/SC), using targeted next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry to compare the molecular profiles of the different histotypes present in each case. In 16 of 18 cases there was molecular evidence that both components shared a clonal origin. Eight cases (6 EC/SC, 1 EC/CCC, and 1 SC/CCC) showed an SC molecular profile that was the same in both components. Five cases (3 CCC/EC and 2 SC/EC) showed a shared endometrioid molecular profile and identical mismatch-repair protein deficiency in both components. A single SC/EC case harbored the same POLE exonuclease domain mutation in both components. One SC/CCC and 1 EC/CCC case showed both shared and unique molecular features in the 2 histotype components, suggesting early molecular divergence from a common clonal origin. In 2 cases, there were no shared molecular features, and these appear to be biologically unrelated synchronous tumors. Overall, these results show that the different histologic components in mixed endometrial carcinomas typically share the same molecular aberrations. Mixed endometrial carcinomas most commonly occur through morphologic mimicry, whereby tumors with serous-type molecular profile show morphologic features of EC or CCC, or through underlying deficiency in DNA nucleotide repair, with resulting rapid accrual of mutations and intratumoral phenotypic heterogeneity. Less commonly, mixed endometrial carcinomas are the result of early molecular divergence from a common progenitor clone or are synchronous biologically unrelated tumors (collision tumors).

Clinical outcome of 23 patients with mixed endometrioid and serous endometrial carcinomas (mixed EEC-SC) was compared to that of pure endometrioid (EEC) and pure serous (SC) carcinomas. Hotspot mutation frequencies in KRAS, PIK3CA, PTEN, and TP53 and microsatellite instability (MSI) status were determined in mixed EEC-SC, as well as in their EEC and SC microdissected components separately, and alterations were compared to frequencies in pure EEC and SC. Relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) differed significantly between mixed EEC-SC and pure EEC and SC, revealing that outcome of mixed EEC-SCs was intermediate to that of pure EEC and pure SC. PTEN mutations were absent in pure SC, but occurred in 20 % of pure EEC, and 13 % of mixed EEC-SC. In contrast, TP53 mutations were more frequent in pure SC (17 %) and mixed EEC-SC (22 %) than in pure EEC (2 %). Mutations in mixed EEC-SC were shared by the two microdissected components in 30 %, whereas in 35 %, some mutations were component-specific. Mutation analysis confirms similarities between the EEC and SC components of mixed EEC-SC with pure EEC and pure SC, respectively. However, PTEN and KRAS mutations were more frequent in the SC component of mixed EEC-SC than in pure SC, while TP53 mutations were more frequent in the EEC component of mixed EEC-SC than in pure EEC. Presence of different clonal mutation pattern between EEC and SC components of mixed EEC-SC raises the possibility of divergent tumor heterogeneity or biclonal origin in some cases.