Search

Serous carcinoma of the uterus (USC) is a pathological subtype of high-grade endometrial cancers, with no effective treatment for advanced cases. Since such refractory tumors frequently harbor antitumor immune tolerance, many immunotherapies have been investigated for various malignant tumors using immuno-competent animal models mimicking their local immunities. In this study, we established an orthotopic mouse model of high-grade endometrial cancer and evaluated the local tumor immunity to explore the efficacy of immunotherapies against USC. A multivariate analysis of 62 human USC cases revealed that the tumor-infiltrating cell status, few CD8+ cells and abundant myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), was an independent prognostic factor (P < 0.005). A murine endometrial cancer cell (mECC) was obtained from C57BL/6 mice via endometrium-specific deletion of Pten and Tp53 , and another high-grade cell (HPmECC) was established by further overexpressing Myc in mECCs. HPmECCs exhibited higher capacities of migration and anchorage-independent proliferation than mECCs (P < 0.01, P < 0.0001), and when both types of cells were inoculated into the uterus of C57BL/6 mice, the prognosis of mice bearing HPmECC-derived tumors was significantly poorer (P < 0.001). Histopathological analysis of HPmECC orthotopic tumors showed serous carcinoma-like features with prominent tumor infiltration of MDSCs (P < 0.05), and anti-Gr-1 antibody treatment significantly prolonged the prognosis of HPmECC-derived tumor-bearing mice (P < 0.05). High CCL7 expression was observed in human USC and HPmECC, and MDSCs migration was promoted in a CCL7 concentration-dependent manner. These results indicate that antitumor immunity is suppressed in USC due to increased number of tumor-infiltrating MDSCs via CCL signal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESSs) are rare tumors and are divided into two groups: low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS-LG) and undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma (UES). The purpose of this study was to compare the clinicopathological features and immunophenotypes of ESS-LG and UES. Methods: The authors evaluated 16 patients diagnosed with ESS at the Hyogo Cancer Center, reviewed their files and data, and performed an immunohistochemical study for oncogenic proteins (EGFR, PDGFR-α, and PDGFR-β) and cell cycle regulators (cyclin D1, cyclin E, p16, p21, p27, and p53) to compare ESS-LG and UES using the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Results: Four cases (25 %) were classified as ESS-LGs and 12 (75 %) as UES. Patients with UES had a significantly worse overall survival than did those with ESS-LG ( p = 0.0445). Although no ESS-LGs showed expression of p16, 10 of 12 (83 %) UESs showed expression of p16. UESs showed a trend toward higher expression of cyclin D1, p21, and p53 compared with ESS-LGs. Conclusions: Our data emphasize the clinical importance of the WHO classification of ESS. It is of utmost importance to establish a proper classification to increase the consistency of data that may be useful for improving clinical and therapeutic management of patients with ESS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]