Search

Background: Mismatch‐repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) status has therapeutic implications in endometrial cancer (EC). The authors evaluated the concordance of testing and factors contributing to MMR expression heterogeneity. Methods: Six hundred sixty‐six ECs were characterized using immunohistochemistry (IHC), MSI testing, and mut‐L homolog 1 (MLH1) methylation. Select samples underwent whole‐transcriptome analysis and next‐generation sequencing. MMR expression of metastatic/recurrent sites was evaluated. Results: MSI testing identified 27.3% of cases as MSI‐high (n = 182), MMR IHC identified 25.1% cases as MMR‐deficient (n = 167), and 3.8% of cases (n = 25) demonstrated discordant results. A review of IHC staining explained discordant results in 18 cases, revealing subclonal loss of MLH1/Pms 1 homolog 2 (PMS2) (n = 10) and heterogeneous MMR IHC (mut‐S homolog 6 [MSH6], n = 7; MLH1/PMS2, n = 1). MSH6‐associated Lynch syndrome was diagnosed in three of six cases with heterogeneous expression. Subclonal or heterogeneous cases had a 38.9% recurrence rate (compared with 16.7% in complete MMR‐deficient cases and 9% in MMR‐proficient cases) and had abnormal MMR IHC results in all metastatic recurrent sites (n = 7). Tumors with subclonal MLH1/PMS2 demonstrated 74 differentially expressed genes (determined using digital spatial transcriptomics) when stratified by MLH1 expression, including many associated with epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Conclusions: Subclonal/heterogeneous MMR IHC cases showed epigenetic loss in 66.7%, germline mutations in 16.7%, and somatic mutations in 16.7%. MMR IHC reported as intact/deficient missed 21% of cases of Lynch syndrome. EC with subclonal/heterogeneous MMR expression demonstrated a high recurrence rate, and metastatic/recurrent sites were MMR‐deficient. Transcriptional analysis indicated an increased risk for migration/metastasis, suggesting that clonal MMR deficiency may be a driver for tumor aggressiveness. Reporting MMR IHC only as intact/deficient, without reporting subclonal and heterogeneous staining, misses opportunities for biomarker‐directed therapy. Plain Language Summary: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer, and 20%–40% of tumors have a defect in DNA proofreading known as mismatch‐repair (MMR) deficiency.These results can be used to guide therapy.Tests for this defect can yield differing results, revealing heterogeneous (mixed) proofreading capabilities.Tumors with discordant testing results and mixed MMR findings can have germline or somatic defects in MMR genes.Cells with deficient DNA proofreading in tumors with mixed MMR findings have DNA expression profiles linked to more aggressive characteristics and cancer spread.These MMR‐deficient cells may drive tumor behavior and the risk of spreading cancer. Intratumoral heterogeneity, including subclonal and heterogeneous mismatch‐repair (MMR) expression, can yield discordant results from diagnostic assays, such as immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction‐based microsatellite instability testing. Within endometrial cancers, subclonal or heterogeneous MMR expression may be attributed to germline or somatic mutations in MMR proteins, and the authors demonstrate that these tumors are characterized by clonal selection favoring the propagation of MMR deficiency at sites of metastasis or recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Genomic studies have revealed that multiple genes are mutated at varying frequency in endometrial cancer (EC); however, the relevance of many of these mutations is poorly understood. An EC-specific recurrent mutation in the MAX transcription factor p.His28Arg was recently discovered. We sought to assess the functional consequences of this hotspot mutation and determine its association with cancer-relevant phenotypes.Methods: MAX was sequenced in 509 endometrioid ECs, and associations between mutation status and clinicopathologic features were assessed. EC cell lines stably expressing MAXH28R were established and used for functional experiments. DNA binding was examined using electrophoretic mobility shift assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation. Transcriptional profiling was performed with microarrays. Murine flank (six to 11 mice per group) and intraperitoneal tumor models were used for in vivo studies. Vascularity of xenografts was assessed by MECA-32 immunohistochemistry. The paracrine pro-angiogenic nature of MAXH28R-expressing EC cells was tested using microfluidic HUVEC sprouting assays and VEGFA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. All statistical tests were two-sided.Results: Twenty-two of 509 tumors harbored mutations in MAX, including 12 tumors with the p.His28Arg mutation. Patients with a MAX mutation had statistically significantly reduced recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio = 4.00, 95% confidence interval = 1.15 to 13.91, P = .03). MAXH28R increased affinity for canonical E-box sequences, and MAXH28R-expressing EC cells dramatically altered transcriptional profiles. MAXH28R-derived xenografts statistically significantly increased vascular area compared with MAXWT and empty vector tumors (P = .003 and P = .008, respectively). MAXH28R-expressing EC cells secreted nearly double the levels of VEGFA compared with MAXWT cells (P = .03, .005, and .005 at 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively), and conditioned media from MAXH28R cells increased sprouting when applied to HUVECs.Conclusion: These data highlight the importance of MAX mutations in EC and point to increased vascularity as one mechanism contributing to clinical aggressiveness of EC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]