Search

The secreted cochaperone STI1 triggers activation of protein kinase A (PKA) and ERK1/2 signaling by interacting with the cellular prion (PrP(C)) at the cell surface, resulting in neuroprotection and increased neuritogenesis. Here, we investigated whether STI1 triggers PrP(C) trafficking and tested whether this process controls PrP(C)-dependent signaling. We found that STI1, but not a STI1 mutant unable to bind PrP(C), induced PrP(C) endocytosis. STI1-induced signaling did not occur in cells devoid of endogenous PrP(C); however, heterologous expression of PrP(C) reconstituted both PKA and ERK1/2 activation. In contrast, a PrP(C) mutant lacking endocytic activity was unable to promote ERK1/2 activation induced by STI1, whereas it reconstituted PKA activity in the same condition, suggesting a key role of endocytosis in the former process. The activation of ERK1/2 by STI1 was transient and appeared to depend on the interaction of the two proteins at the cell surface or shortly after internalization. Moreover, inhibition of dynamin activity by expression of a dominant-negative mutant caused the accumulation and colocalization of these proteins at the plasma membrane, suggesting that both proteins use a dynamin-dependent internalization pathway. These results show that PrP(C) endocytosis is a necessary step to modulate STI1-dependent ERK1/2 signaling involved in neuritogenesis.

We have investigated the intracellular traffic of PrP(c), a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein implicated in spongiform encephalopathies. A fluorescent functional green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged version of PrP(c) is found at the cell surface and in intracellular compartments in SN56 cells. Confocal microscopy and organelle-specific markers suggest that the protein is found in both the Golgi and the recycling endosomal compartment. Perturbation of endocytosis with a dynamin I-K44A dominant-negative mutant altered the steady-state distribution of the GFP-PrP(c), leading to the accumulation of fluorescence in unfissioned endocytic intermediates. These pre-endocytic intermediates did not seem to accumulate GFP-GPI, a minimum GPI-anchored protein, suggesting that PrP(c) trafficking does not depend solely on the GPI anchor. We found that internalized GFP-PrP(c) accumulates in Rab5-positive endosomes and that a Rab5 mutant alters the steady-state distribution of GFP-PrP(c) but not that of GFP-GPI between the plasma membrane and early endosomes. Therefore, we conclude that PrP(c) internalizes via a dynamin-dependent endocytic pathway and that the protein is targeted to the recycling endosomal compartment via Rab5-positive early endosomes. These observations indicate that traffic of GFP-PrP(c) is not determined predominantly by the GPI anchor and that, different from other GPI-anchored proteins, PrP(c) is delivered to classic endosomes after internalization.

The glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored cellular prion protein (PrPc) has a fundamental role in prion diseases. Intracellular trafficking of PrPc is important in the generation of protease resistant PrP species but little is known of how endocytosis affects PrPc function. Here, we discuss recent experiments that have illuminated how PrPc is internalized and what are the possible destinations taken by the protein. Contrary to what would be expected for a GPI-anchored protein there is increasing evidence that clathrin-mediated endocytosis and classical endocytic organelles participate in PrPc trafficking. Moreover, the N-terminal domain of PrPc may be involved in sorting events that can direct the protein during its intracellular journey. Indeed, the concept that the GPI-anchor determines PrPc trafficking has been challenged. Cellular signaling can be triggered or be regulated by PrPc and we suggest that endocytosis of PrPc may influence signaling in several ways. Definition of the processes that participate in PrPc endocytosis and intracellular trafficking can have a major impact on our understanding of the mechanisms involved in PrPc function and conversion to protease resistant conformations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]