Search

The five somatostatin receptor subtypes, named sst1 to sst5, activate both distinct and common signaling pathways and exhibit different patterns of receptor regulation. Until recently it was believed that once a particular somatostatin receptor was activated by an agonist, all the downstream signaling and regulatory effects characteristic of that receptor subtype in that cellular environment would be triggered. Thus, differences in the actions of somatostatin analogs between tissues were attributed to variability in the nature and concentration of the sst receptor subtypes and effectors expressed in different targets. However, agonists have recently been shown to exhibit functional selectivity at individual sst receptors such that they can elicit a subset of that receptor’s potential effects, a property known as biased agonism. This review will summarize the evidence for functionally selective somatostatin receptor agonists and discuss the implications and promise of these new findings.

The 1970s and 1980s were a transformative period for neuroendocrine research. During these 2 decades, many of the hypothalamic peptides regulating pituitary hormone secretion were identified and the field exploded with studies characterizing the spectrum of their biological activities. In the race to these exciting discoveries, discordant results were published regarding the central actions of the newly discovered GH-releasing factor (GRF). Two groups reported a biphasic effect of central administration of human GRF with low doses suppressing and high doses stimulating GH release in rats (1, 2). In contrast, a third group reported that administration of both low and high doses of human GRF inhibited GH secretion (3). Through meticulous scientific detective work, the source of the discrepancy was uncovered and, in the best scientific tradition, promptly published (4). Chemical characterization of the peptide that produced GH inhibition at all doses demonstrated that the putative GRF peptide consisted predominantly of corticotropin-releasing factor. Furthermore, use of new GRF samples reproduced the previously reported stimulatory effect on GH. Although how the original sample became contaminated is not known (4, 5), the source of this error is irrelevant for the purpose of scientific progress: the truth was discovered and revealed.

Background and aim: Many neuroendocrine gastrointestinal tumours express receptors for the regulatory peptide somatostatin. Among the five existing somatostatin receptor (sst) subtypes, sst2A is the most frequently expressed in these tumours. However, little information is available about the cellular location of sst2A in corresponding non-neoplastic epithelial tissues. Methods: We searched for sst2A immunoreactive cells in non-neoplastic gastrointestinal tissues, and evaluated their number and immunohistochemical characteristics with neuroendocrine markers. Results: The gastric antrum showed numerous sst2A cells, situated in the epithelium, corresponding to gastrin containing neuroendocrine cells, while the gastric corpus was largely devoid of sst2A cells, including enterochromaffin-like cells. The remaining foregut, namely the duodenum and proximal jejunum, also contained a large number of sst2A cells, all being neuroendocrine cells and many of them characterised as gastrin cells. Sst2A cells were also detected in the midgut, in low numbers in the epithelium of the distal jejunum and ileum, but not in the appendix vermiformis, the caecum, or the hindgut, despite the large number of neuroendocrine cells present in this area. In addition, sst2A cells were found in the whole gastrointestinal tract in the myenteric and submucosal plexus. Conclusions: While sst2A receptors on antral gastrin cells presumably mediate somatostatin inhibition of gastrin secretion, the effects of somatostatin on motility and ion transport in the lower gastrointestinal tract may be mediated by sst2A receptors in the neural plexus. These data provide a molecular basis for the physiological actions of somatostatin in human gastrointestinal tissue.

Many neuroendocrine gastrointestinal and lung tumors express sst2A somatostatin receptors. Because the cellular location of sst2A in the corresponding non-neoplastic tissue is unknown, we searched for sst2A immuno-reactive cells and characterized their type in these tissues using a highly specific sst2A antibody (R2–88). Epithelial sst2A cells, identified as neuroendocrine, gastrin-producing cells, were found in large numbers in the antrum and the duodenum, but not in the gastric corpus. They were also present in the proximal jejunum, rarely noted in the distal jejunum and ileum, and absent in the large intestine and the appendix vermiformis. Moreover, sst2A cells were found abundantly in the neural plexus. sst2A receptors on antral gastrin cells could mediate somatostatin inhibition on gastrin secretion, whereas those in the neural plexus could mediate somatostatin effects on motility and ion transport in the lower gastrointestinal tract. Rare sst2A cells in bronchi and bronchioles located basally and parabasally in the gastrointestinal epithelium were detected that could represent stem/progenitor cells. It is currently not clear whether and which of the identified sst2A cells are at the origin of sst2A-positive neuroendocrine gut or lung tumors.

We previously demonstrated that phosphorylation of somatostatin receptor 2A (sst2A) is rapidly increased in transfected cells both by agonist and by the protein kinase C (PKC) activator phorbol myristate acetate (PMA). Here, we investigate whether PKC-mediated receptor phosphorylation is involved in the homologous or heterologous regulation of endogenous sst2 receptors in AR42J pancreatic acinar cells upon stimulation by agonist or by cholecystokinin (CCK) or bombesin (BBS). Somatostatin, PMA, CCK, and BBS all increased sst2A receptor phosphorylation 5- to 10-fold within minutes. Somatostatin binding also caused rapid internalization of the ligand-receptor complex, and PMA, CCK, and BBS all stimulated this internalization further. Additionally, sst2 receptor-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase was desensitized by all treatments. Somatostatin, as well as peptidic (SMS201–995) and nonpeptidic (L-779,976) sst2 receptor agonists increased the EC50 for somatostatin inhibition 20-fold. In contrast, pretreatment with BBS, CCK, or PMA caused a modest 2-fold increase in the EC50 for cyclase inhibition. Whereas the PKC inhibitor GF109203X abolished sst2A receptor phosphorylation by CCK, BBS, and PMA, it did not alter the effect of somatostatin, demonstrating that these reactions were catalyzed by different kinases. Consistent with a functional role for PKC-mediated receptor phosphorylation, GF109203X prevented PMA stimulation of sst2 receptor internalization. Surprisingly, however, GF109203X did not inhibit BBS and CCK stimulation of sst2A receptor endocytosis. These results demonstrate that homologous and heterologous hormones induce sst2A receptor phosphorylation by PKC-independent and -dependent mechanisms, respectively, and produce distinct effects on receptor signaling and internalization. In addition, the heterologous hormones also modulate sst2 receptor internalization by a novel mechanism that is independent of receptor phosphorylation.

Antibodies are indispensable research reagents. Their use in endocrinology has exploded since the original radioimmunoassays were developed to measure hormone levels. They are now routinely used in molecular endocrinology research to detect and quantitate cellular proteins and determine their distribution in tissues, in cells, and in subcellular compartments. They detect changes in protein structure produced by covalent modification during cell signaling (eg, phosphorylation), transcriptional regulation (acetylation and methylation), or protein degradation (ubiquitination). They identify and detect protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions by coimmunoprecipitation. Antibodies are used as tools to sort cells, to identify drug targets in normal and diseased tissue, and to monitor disease status and progression. And that is just the tip of the iceberg. Unfortunately, the widespread use of antibodies has also generated enormous controversy: the inability of investigators to replicate published data often results from false-positive or false-negative results produced with antibodies that have not been properly validated (1,–5). The problems are particularly intense in fields that use antibodies to analyze proteins that are expressed at low levels in cells: G protein–coupled receptors, steroid hormone receptors, ion channels, transporters, and signal-transducing enzymes such as adenylyl cyclase (6,–22). In addition, ultrasensitive detection methods have compounded the problem as illustrated by studies aimed at detecting low-abundance protein–DNA interactions (eg, chromatin immunoprecipitation assays) (5, 23). So what can we do as individual scientists and as journal editors to ensure the reliability and reproducibility of the data that we generate, the data that we publish, and the data that we rely upon to formulate new hypotheses and plan future experiments?

The sst1 somatostatin (SRIF) receptor subtype is widely expressed in the endocrine, gastrointestinal, and neuronal systems as well as in hormone-sensitive tumors, yet little is known about its regulation. Here we investigated the desensitization, internalization, and phosphorylation of sst1 expressed in CHO-K1 cells. Treatment of cells with 100 nm SRIF for 30 min reduced maximal SRIF inhibition of adenylyl cyclase from 40 to 10%. This desensitization was rapid (t(12) 180 min). Incubation of cells with SRIF also caused a rapid (t(12) < 2 min) increase in sst1 receptor phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner (EC(50) = 1.3 nm), as determined in a mobility shift phosphorylation assay. Receptor phosphorylation was not affected by pertussis toxin, indicating a requirement for receptor occupancy rather than signaling. The protein kinase C activator, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate also stimulated sst1 receptor phosphorylation whereas forskolin did not. Both agonist- and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-stimulated receptor phosphorylation occurred mainly on serine. These studies are the first to demonstrate phosphorylation of the sst1 receptor and suggest that phosphorylation mediated uncoupling, rather than sequestration, leads to its desensitization.

The distribution of the sst2A receptor was investigated, using immunohistochemistry, with the specific antipeptide antibody R2-88, in a total of 120 tumors of the nervous and the neuroendocrine systems, including small-cell lung carcinomas, medulloblastomas, neuroblastomas, pheochromocytomas, and paragangliomas. The great majority of the tumor samples, frozen or formalin-fixed, showed a positive immunohistochemical staining with R2-88, and an excellent correlation with receptor autoradiography using 125I[Tyr3]-octreotide. Whereas small-cell lung carcinomas and medulloblastomas had a predominantly plasma membrane staining, pheochromocytomas and neuroblastomas had variable ratios of cell surface and intracellular staining. Strikingly, a preferentially cytoplasmic staining was seen in tumors with a high level of somatostatin gene expression, whereas a more plasma membranous staining was seen in tumors lacking somatostatin messenger RNA. Specificity of both the plasma membrane and the cytoplasmic staining pattern was confirmed in immunoblots, which showed the immunoreactive receptor migrating as a characteristic 70-kDa broad band. In both immunohistochemical and immunoblotting experiments, staining was abolished by antibody blockade with 100 nM antigen peptide. These results describe, for the first time, the localization of the sst2A receptor protein in human small-cell lung carcinomas, medulloblastomas, neuroblastomas, and paragangliomas. Moreover, it is the first report investigating possible causes for distinct subcellular localizations of sst2A in human tissues. We show that the subcellular distribution of the receptor may be dependent on the surrounding somatostatin concentration, consistent with both the known effect of somatostatin to cause sst2A receptor internalization and an autocrine regulation of tumors by the peptide they produce. Moreover, our demonstration that the sst2A receptor can be identified in this group of tumors using simple immunohistochemical methods in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material opens numerous diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic opportunities.

To investigate the effects of somatostatin (somatotropin release-inhibiting factor, SRIF) on the regulation of SST(2A) receptors in mammalian brain, we examined how blockade of SRIF release or stimulation by the SRIF analog [d-Trp(8)]-SRIF would affect the expression and cell surface availability of SST(2A) receptors in rat brain slices. First, we measured the intensity of SST(2A) immunoreactivity, using quantitative light microscopic immunocytochemistry, and levels of SST(2A) mRNA, using semiquantitative RT-PCR, under conditions of acute SRIF release blockade. Incubation of slices from the claustrum or basolateral amygdala, two regions previously shown to contain high concentrations of SST(2A) receptors, in Ca(2+)-free Ringer's for 40 min induced a decrease in the intensity of SST(2A) receptor immunoreactivity and concentration of SST(2A) mRNA as compared with control values obtained in Ca(2+)-supplemented Ringer's. These effects were counteracted in a dose-dependent manner by the addition of 10-100 nm [d-Trp(8)]-SRIF to the Ca(2+)-free medium. Furthermore, both of these effects were abolished in the presence of the endocytosis inhibitors phenylarsine oxide or hyperosmolar sucrose, suggesting that they were dependent on receptor internalization. Electron microscopic immunogold labeling confirmed the existence of an agonist-induced internalization of SST(2A) receptors in central neurons. At a high (10 microm), but not at a low (10 nm), concentration of agonist this internalization resulted in a significant decrease in cell surface receptor density, irrespective of the presence of Ca(2+) in the medium. Taken together, these results suggest that ligand-induced endocytosis is responsible for rapid transcriptional (increase in SST(2A) expression) and trafficking (loss of cell surface receptors) events involved in the control of the somatostatinergic signal.

The sst2A receptor is expressed in the endocrine, gastrointestinal, and neuronal systems as well as in many hormone-sensitive tumors. This receptor is rapidly internalized and phosphorylated in growth hormone-R2 pituitary cells following somatostatin binding (Hipkin, R. W., Friedman, J., Clark, R. B., Eppler, C. M., and Schonbrunn, A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 13869–13876). The protein kinase C (PKC) activator, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), also stimulates sst2A phosphorylation. Here we examine the mechanisms and consequences of PMA and agonist-induced sst2A phosphorylation. Like somatostatin, both PMA and bombesin increased sst2A receptor phosphorylation within 2 min. The PKC inhibitor GF109203X blocked PMA- and bombesin- stimulated sst2A phosphorylation, whereas stimulation by the somatostatin analog SMS 201–995 was unaffected. Agonist and PMA each stimulated phosphorylation in two receptor domains, the third intracellular loop and the C-terminal tail. Functionally, PMA dramatically increased the internalization of the sst2A receptor-ligand complex. This PMA stimulation was blocked by GF109203X, whereas basal internalization was unaffected. However, neither basal nor PMA-stimulated internalization was altered by pertussis toxin, whereas both were blocked by hypertonic sucrose. Therefore PKC activation and agonist binding stimulate sst2A phosphorylation by distinct mechanisms, and PKC potentiates internalization of the sst2A receptor via clathrin-coated pits. Thus, hormonal stimulation of PKC-coupled receptors may provide a mechanism for regulating the inhibitory actions of somatostatin in target tissue.

Binding of neuropeptides to their receptors usually results in internalization of receptor-ligand complexes. This process serves a crucial role in receptor downregulation, resensitization, and transmembrane signaling. It has mainly been investigated in cells ectopically expressing recombinant receptors. In the present study, we investigated whether rat central neurons and astrocytes naturally expressing somatostatin (SRIF) receptors internalized this neuropeptide. We demonstrated that 29% of cortical and 45% of hippocampal neurons in culture expressed the SRIF receptor sst2A and that 40–50% of the neurons internalized fluorescent SRIF. Similarly, an important proportion of astrocytes expressed sst2A (up to 60% in cortical cultures) and internalized fluo-SRIF. Competition experiments using the sst2/sst5-preferring agonist SMS 201-995 (octreotide) showed that a subpopulation of neurons internalized fluo-SRIF via sst2 and/or sst5 receptors, but that others also did so via other subtypes. Fluo-SRIF labeling was barely competed for by the sst1-selective agonist CH-275, indicating that sst1 was unlikely to be mediating SRIF internalization in hippocampal and cortical neurons. Given the paucity of sst5 receptors in cerebral cortex and hippocampus and the poor yield of sst4 internalization in transfected cells, we conclude that sst2 and sst3 subtypes are the most likely to be responsible for SRIF internalization in our culture systems. Synapse 38:177–186, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The capacity of the pituitary to suppress hormone secretion in response to somatostatin (SRIF) is markedly age dependent. Immature pituitaries are relatively resistant to SRIF effects, and increasing sensitivity to SRIF with advancing age is believed to cause characteristic developmental changes in pituitary hormone secretion in mammals. However, the cellular mechanism(s) underlying this developmental pattern of response to SRIF are not understood. Because somatostatin receptors (ssts) are critical mediators of SRIF’s actions on target tissues, we investigated the expression of sst1, sst2, sst3, sst4, and sst5 messenger RNA (mRNA) in pituitaries of developing and mature rats. Animals were studied at embryonic day 19.5, and at postnatal days 2, 12, 30, 45, 70, and 1 yr; these ages correspond to major changes in circulating GH levels and pituitary responsiveness to SRIF. Pituitary levels of sst2 mRNA increased strikingly and progressively with advancing age after birth (F = 30.92, P < 0.0001). Compared with...

Although in situ hybridization has been used to examine the distribution of messenger RNA for somatostatin receptor subtypes (sst) in human tumors, the cellular localization of sst1 and sst2A receptors has not been reported. In this study, we describe the cellular localization of human sst1 and sst2A receptor proteins in both cryostat- and paraffin-embedded sections of 25 human tumor tissues using two recently developed polyclonal antibodies. Six somatostatin (SS) receptor (SSR) positive tumors (two gastrinomas, three carcinoids, one pheochromocytoma) and one SSR negative tumor (renal cell carcinoma), selected by positive and negative SSR autoradiography, respectively, were studied by both immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis. The six SSR positive tumors expressed sst2A, while 4 of 5 expressed sst1 as well. The SSR negative tumor did not express either sst1 or sst2A. Western blot analysis of wheat germ agglutinin purified membrane proteins confirmed the presence of the sst1 and sst2A glycosylated receptors. The paraffin-embedded sections gave best information with respect to the subcellular localization. Sst1 immunoreactivity was observed both on the membrane and in the cytoplasm, while sst2A showed predominantly membrane-associated immunoreactivity. This subcellular distribution of sst1 or sst2A receptors was confirmed in paraffin-embedded sections of 8 additional intestinal carcinoids, 5 gastrinomas and 5 pheochromocytomas. Sst1 receptors were detected in 7 out of 8 carcinoids, in all gastrinomas, and in 4 out of 5 pheochromocytomas, while 6 out of 8 carcinoids, all gastrinomas, and 3 out of 5 pheochromocytomas expressed sst2A receptors. In conclusion, sst1 and sst2A receptors show a differential subcellular localization in human SSR positive tumors. The use of SSR subtype selective antibodies to detect the subcellular distribution of SSR subtypes in individual tumor cells is an important step forward to understand more about the pathophysiological role of the different SSR subtypes in human tumors.

Using an antipeptide antibody, we reported previously on the distribution of the somatostatin sst2A receptor subtype in rat brain. Depending on the region, immunolabeled receptors were either confined to neuronal perikarya and dendrites or distributed diffusely in tissue. To investigate the functional significance of these distribution patterns, we examined the regional and cellular relationships between somatostatin axons and sst2A receptors in the rat CNS, using double-labeling immunocytochemistry. Light and confocal microscopy revealed a significant correlation (p< 0.02) between the distribution of somatodendritic sst2A receptor immunoreactivity and that of somatostatin terminal fields, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Furthermore, in regions of somatodendritic labeling, a subpopulation of sst2A-immunoreactive cells was also immunopositive for somatostatin, suggesting that a subset of sst2A receptors consists of autoreceptors. By contrast, in regions displaying diffuse sst2A labeling only moderate to low densities of somatostatin terminals were observed, and no significant relationship was found between terminal density and receptor immunoreactivity. At the electron microscopic level, areas expressing somatodendritic sst2A labeling were found by immunogold cytochemistry to display low proportions of membrane-associated, as compared with intracellular, receptors. Conversely, in regions displaying diffuse sst2A receptor labeling, receptors were predominantly associated with neuronal plasma membranes, a finding consistent with the high density of sst2 binding sites previously visualized in these areas by autoradiography. Double-labeling studies demonstrated that in the former but not in the latter regions, sst2A-immunoreactive somata and dendrites were heavily contacted by somatostatin axon terminals. Taken together, these results suggest that the low incidence of membrane-associated receptors observed in regions of somatodendritic sst2A labeling may be caused by downregulation of cell surface receptors by endogenous somatostatin, possibly through ligand-induced receptor internalization.

Previous studies indicated that partial agonists cause less desensitization of the beta2-adrenergic receptor (betaAR) than full agonists; however, the molecular basis for this in intact cells has not been investigated. In the present work, we have determined the rates of desensitization, internalization, and phosphorylation caused by a series of betaAR agonists displaying a 95-fold range of coupling efficiencies. These studies were performed with HEK-293 cells overexpressing the betaAR with hemagglutinin and 6-histidine epitopes introduced into the N and C termini, respectively. This modified betaAR behaved identically to the wild type receptor with regard to agonist Kd, coupling efficiency, and desensitization. The coupling efficiencies for betaAR agonist activation of adenylyl cyclase relative to epinephrine (100%) were 42% for fenoterol, 4.9% for albuterol, 2.5% for dobutamine, and 1.1% for ephedrine. At concentrations of these agonists yielding90% receptor occupancy, the rate and extent (0-30 min) of agonist-induced desensitization of betaAR activation of adenylyl cyclase followed the same order as coupling efficiency, i.e. epinephrine/= fenoterolalbuteroldobutamineephedrine. The rate of internalization of the betaAR with respect to these agonists also followed the same order as the desensitization and exhibited a slight lag. Like internalization and desensitization, betaAR phosphorylation exhibited a dependence on agonist strength. The two strongest agonists, epinephrine and fenoterol, provoked 11-13-fold increases in the level of betaAR phosphorylation after just 1 min, whereas the weak agonists dobutamine and ephedrine caused only 3-4-fold increases, similar to levels induced by cAMP-dependent protein kinase activation with forskolin. With longer treatment times, the level of betaAR phosphorylation declined with strong agonists, but it progressively increased with the weaker partial agonists, such that after 30 min the -fold elevation with epinephrine (6.2 +/- 0.82) was not appreciably different from ephedrine (5.0 +/- 0.96) and significantly less than that caused by albuterol (10.4 +/- 1.7). In summary, our results demonstrate an excellent proportionality between the agonist strength and agonist-induced desensitization, internalization, and the rapid initial phase of phosphorylation. The data support the hypothesis that increasing agonist-coupling efficiency primarily affects desensitization by increasing the rate of betaARK phosphorylation of the betaAR.

The five cloned somatostatin (SRIF) receptors (ssts) are presumed to subserve unique biological roles by virtue of their tissue-specific expression and particular signal transduction mechanisms. However, the function of any individual sst subtype in its normal physiological milieu is not understood, because tissues and cells often express multiple ssts and, in the absence of receptor-specific SRIF analogs, the actions of individual receptors cannot be identified. To unravel the physiological role and signaling mechanism of the ssts, we have generated receptor subtype-specific antibodies and used these antibodies to determine the distribution of the receptor proteins and to identify the signal-transducing molecules with which particular sst subtypes interact.

The stimulation of large-conductance, calcium-activated (BK) potassium channels by somatostatin through protein dephosphorylation in rat pituitary tumor cells (White et al., Nature, 351, 570-573, 1991) is blocked by drugs that interfere with arachidonic acid release by phospholipase A 2 and metabolism by 5-lipoxygenase. In contrast, higher concentrations of the same drugs had no effect on BK channel gating in cell-free patches, on the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by somatostatin, or on the stimulation of BK channels by protein dephosphorylation through a cGMP-dependent pathway (White et al., Nature 361, 263-266, 1993). Exogenous arachidonic acid (1-20 μM) stimulated BK channel activity through protein dephosphorylation as effectively as somatostatin and was also blocked by inhibitors of lipoxygenases but not by inhibitors of phospholipase A 2 . These results support the hypothesis that lipoxygenase metabolites of arachidonic acid are second messengers linking pertussis toxin sensitive G-proteins to protein phosphatases regulating potassium channel activity (Armstrong and White, Trends Neurosci. 15, 403-408, 1992). Published by Elsevier Science Ltd

Somatostatin analogues, which are used to treat neuroendocrine tumors, target the high levels of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR1; alias sst2) expressed in these cancers. However, some tumors are resistant to somatostatin analogues, and it is unknown whether the defect lies in sst2 activation or downstream signaling events. Because sst2 phosphorylation occurs rapidly after receptor activation, we examined whether sst2 is phosphorylated in neuroendocrine tumors. The sst2 receptor phosphorylation was evaluated by IHC and Western blot analysis with the new Ra-1124 antibody specific for the sst2 receptor phosphorylated at Ser341/343 in receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumors obtained from 10 octreotide-treated and 7 octreotide-naïve patients. The specificity, time course, and subcellular localization of sst2 receptor phosphorylation were examined in human embryo kinase–sst2 cell cultures by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. All seven octreotide-naïve tumors displayed exclusively nonphosphorylated cell surface sst2 expression. In contrast, 9 of the 10 octreotide-treated tumors contained phosphorylated sst2 that was predominantly internalized. Western blot analysis confirmed the IHC data. Octreotide treatment of human embryo kinase–sst2 cells in culture demonstrated that phosphorylated sst2 was localized at the plasma membrane after 10 seconds of stimulation and was subsequently internalized into endocytic vesicles. These data show, for the first time to our knowledge, that phosphorylated sst2 is present in most gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors from patients treated with octreotide but that a striking variability exists in the subcellular distribution of phosphorylated receptors among such tumors.

Somatostatin analogs that activate the somatostatin subtype 2A (sst2A) receptor are used to treat neuroendocrine cancers because they inhibit tumor secretion and growth. Recently, new analogs capable of activating multiple somatostatin receptor subtypes have been developed to increase tumor responsiveness. We tested two such multi-somatostatin analogs for functional selectivity at the sst2A receptor: SOM230, which activates sst1, sst2, sst3, and sst5 receptors, and KE108, which activates all sst receptor subtypes. Both compounds are reported to act as full agonists at their target sst receptors. In sst2A-expressing HEK293 cells, somatostatin inhibited cAMP production, stimulated intracellular calcium accumulation, and increased ERK phosphorylation. SOM230 and KE108 were also potent inhibitors of cAMP accumulation, as expected. However, they antagonized somatostatin stimulation of intracellular calcium and behaved as partial agonists/antagonists for ERK phosphorylation. In pancreatic AR42J cells, which express sst2A receptors endogenously, SOM230 and KE108 were both full agonists for cAMP inhibition. However, although somatostatin increased intracellular calcium and ERK phosphorylation, SOM230 and KE108 again antagonized these effects. Distinct mechanisms were involved in sst2A receptor signaling in AR42J cells; pertussis toxin pretreatment blocked somatostatin inhibition of cAMP accumulation but not the stimulation of intracellular calcium and ERK phosphorylation. Our results demonstrate that SOM230 and KE108 behave as agonists for inhibition of adenylyl cyclase but antagonize somatostatin's actions on intracellular calcium and ERK phosphorylation. Thus, SOM230 and KE108 are not somatostatin mimics, and their functional selectivity at sst2A receptors must be considered in clinical applications where it may have important consequences for therapy.

THE neuropeptide somatostatin inhibits secretion from electrically excitable cells in the pituitary, pancreas, gut and brain1. In mammalian pituitary tumour cells somatostatin inhibits secretion through two distinct pertussis toxin-sensitive mechanisms2–5. One involves inhibition of adenylyl cyclase6, the other an unidentified cyclic AMP-independent mechanism that reduces Ca2+ influx7,8 by increasing membrane conductance to potassium9,10. Here we demonstrate that the predominant electrophysiological effect of somatostatin on metabolically intact pituitary tumour cells is a large, sustained increase in the activity of the large-conductance Ca2+- and voltage-activated K+ channels (BK). This action of somatostatin does not involve direct effects of Ca2+, cAMP or G proteins on the channels. Our results indicate instead that somato-statin stimulates BK channel activity through protein dephosphorylation.

Hormone-stimulated receptor internalization and desensitization occur widely in the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family. A critical first step in both these processes is thought to be receptor phosphorylation, a reaction which has been extensively characterized in cell culture. However, little is known about GPCR phosphorylation in vivo. The somatostatin (SS) receptor subtype (sst)2A is widely distributed in human neuroendocrine tumors, and SS analogs are commonly used to target this receptor for both therapy and diagnosis. In cultured pituitary cells sst2A is rapidly phosphorylated and internalized after hormone binding. The aim of the present study was to go one crucial step further and characterize the phosphorylation state of this receptor in human neuroendocrine tumors using a newly developed gel-shift assay. The receptor from a somatostatinoma was completely phosphorylated. In contrast, only unphosphorylated sst2A was present in human tumors that were not exposed to autocrine stimulation. Both in vivo and in cultured cells, the phosphorylation state of the sst2A receptor was correlated with its subcellular localization: phosphorylated receptor was mostly intracellular, whereas unphosphorylated receptor was localized at the cell surface. These results are the first to demonstrate ligand-stimulated GPCR phosphorylation in human tissue in situ, providing a crucial step toward a better understanding of receptor regulation in vivo. Analysis of sst2A phosphorylation promises to provide a sensitive indicator of the effectiveness of SS analogs in diagnostic and therapeutic situations in tumor patients.

Amphiphysins are SH3 domain-containing proteins thought to function in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. To investigate the potential role of amphiphysin II in cellular trafficking of G protein-coupled somatostatin (SRIF) receptors, we generated an AtT-20 cell line stably overexpressing amphiphysin IIb, a splice variant that does not bind clathrin. Endocytosis of (125)I-[d-Trp(8)]SRIF was not affected by amphiphysin IIb overexpression. However, the maximal binding capacity (B(max)) of the ligand on intact cells was significantly lower in amphiphysin IIb overexpressing than in non-transfected cells. This difference was no longer apparent when the experiments were performed on crude cell homogenates, suggesting that amphiphysin IIb overexpression interferes with SRIF receptor targeting to the cell surface and not with receptor synthesis. Accordingly, immunofluorescence experiments demonstrated that, in amphiphysin overexpressing cells, sst(2A) and sst(5) receptors were segregated in a juxtanuclear compartment identified as the trans-Golgi network. Amphiphysin IIb overexpression had no effect on corticotrophin-releasing factor 41-stimulated adrenocorticotropic hormone secretion, suggesting that it is not involved in the regulated secretory pathway. Taken together, these results suggest that amphiphysin II is not necessary for SRIF receptor endocytosis but is critical for its constitutive targeting to the plasma membrane. Therefore, amphiphysin IIb may be an important component of the constitutive secretory pathway.

Somatostatin, also known as somatotropin release-inhibiting factor (SRIF), is secreted by pancreatic delta-cells and inhibits the secretion of both insulin and glucagon. SRIF initiates its actions by binding to a family of six G protein-coupled receptors (sst1, -2A, -2B, -3, -4, and -5) encoded by five genes. Messenger RNA for both sst2 and sst5 have been reported in the rat pancreas, and the sst2A receptor protein has been localized to rat pancreatic alpha and pancreatic polypeptide-secreting cells in the islets as well as to pancreatic acinar cells. In this study we have used double immunostaining to show that the sst5 protein is expressed exclusively in the beta-cells of rat pancreatic islets and localizes with insulin-secreting alpha-cells. The sst5 receptor is not colocalized with sst2A. Thus, in the rat SRIF inhibits pancreatic insulin and glucagon secretion via different sst receptor subtypes.

Genes for five somatostatin receptor subtypes, designated sst1-5, have been cloned and shown to belong to the seven transmembrane domain receptor family. The sst2 mRNA transcript is alternatively spliced to generate two related receptor products (sst2A and sst2B) which differ in their carboxylterminal sequence whereas each of the other genes is transcribed to give a single unique receptor protein. The six sst receptor subtypes all bind SRIF14, SRIF28 and the cortistatins with high affinity but vary in their affinity for analogs, such as octreotide. Although the tissue distribution of sst mRNAs has been extensively examined, much less is known about the cellular distribution of the individual receptor proteins. Recent studies with sst subtype specific antibodies have localized individual sst receptors to specific cell types within the rat gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, pituitary and brain. Furthermore, sst receptors have recently been identified in human tumors by immunocytochemistry, providing a significantly improved method for sst receptor detection. All six sst receptor subtypes are linked to guanine nucleotide binding proteins (G proteins) and lead to inhibition of adenylyl cyclase following hormone binding. The sst receptors also regulate a variety of different effectors via G proteins, including calcium and potassium channels and serine and tyrosine phosphatases. In addition to signalling, two other processes are activated by hormone binding: receptor desensitization and receptor internalization. The extent to which these occur seems to vary for the different receptor subtypes. Recent studies have shown that the sst2A receptor is rapidly phosphorylated upon hormone binding, suggesting that this phosphorylation may be responsible for the desensitization and/or internalization of this receptor. The importance of receptor regulation in cellular responsiveness to somatostatin and for receptor detection as well as the molecular mechanisms by which these processes occur provide important areas for future investigations.

Somatostatin and octreotide inhibit endocrine pancreatic functions in man, via specific somatostatin receptors. However, the cellular distribution of the different somatostatin receptor subtype proteins has not been determined in the human pancreas. Here, the immunohistochemical distribution of the sst2A receptor was investigated using the sst2A receptor specific anti-peptide antibody R2-88 in cryostat as well as in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of human pancreatic tissue, and compared with insulin, glucagon and somatostatin immunostaining of adjacent sections. All pancreatic islets were immunostained with R2-88. Most islet cells were labeled: the sst2A receptors were present in insulin as well as glucagon producing cells, but were not detected in intra-islet vessels nor in adjacent acinar tissue. Absorption of the sst2A antibody with 100 nM of the antigen peptide abolished specific staining in tissue sections. Immunohistochemical staining with R2-88 correlated with the labeling observed after receptor autoradiography using the sst2-preferring radioligand, 125I-Tyr3-octreotide. Therefore, the clinical efficacy of octreotide on glucagon and insulin release can be explained by the presence of sst2A receptors in human A and B pancreatic islet cells. Moreover, absence of sst2A receptors in human acinar tissue suggests that the action of somatostatin on pancreatic exocrine secretion is mediated either indirectly or through a different somatostatin receptor subtype on acinar cells.

Somatostatin (SRIF), originally described as a hypothalamic hormone that inhibits the release of growth hormone was subsequently shown to inhibit the secretion of multiple pituitary hormones. Five genes encoding six different SRIF receptors (sst1, 2A, 2B, 3, 4 and 5) have been cloned and mRNAs for all five are expressed in the anterior pituitary. We used double immunostaining to determine which cells in the anterior pituitary bear sst2A and sst5 receptors. Our results show that these two receptors are widely distributed in the pituitary gland and are both present in a large percentage of GH cells. In addition, sst5 occurs in a small population of corticotrophs and a large percentage of lactotrophs whereas sst2A is found in only a few lactotrophs but a large number of corticotrophs. The sst2A receptor is also expressed in about a third of the gonadotrophs and thyrotrophs. Interestingly, sst2A and sst5 receptors colocalize in a small percentage of cells, most likely somatotrophs demonstrating that the same cells can contain multiple sst receptor subtypes. These results indicate that sst subtype specific analogs are likely to be useful for the selective regulation of individual pituitary hormones.

Cellular responsiveness to the inhibitory peptide somatostatin (SRIF) or its clinically used analogs can desensitize with agonist exposure. While desensitization of other seven-transmembrane domain receptors is mediated by receptor phosphorylation and/or internalization, the mechanisms mediating SRIF receptor (sst) desensitization are unknown. Therefore, we investigated the susceptibility of the sst2A receptor isotype to ligand-induced desensitization, internalization, and phosphorylation in GH-R2 cells, a clone of pituitary tumor cells overexpressing this receptor. A 30-min exposure of cells to either SRIF or the analog SMS 201-995 (SMS) reduced both the potency and efficacy of agonist inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. Internalization of receptor-bound ligand was rapid (t1/2 = 4 min) and temperature-dependent. SRIF and SMS increased the phosphorylation of the 71-kDa sst2A protein 25-fold within 15 min. Receptor phosphorylation was dependent on both the concentration and time of agonist exposure and was not affected by pertussis toxin pretreatment, indicating that receptor occupancy rather than second messenger formation was required. Receptor phosphorylation was also stimulated by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate activation of protein kinase C. Both ligand-stimulated and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-stimulated receptor phosphorylation occurred primarily on serine. These studies are the first demonstration of agonist-dependent desensitization, internalization, and phosphorylation of the sst2A receptor and suggest that phosphorylation may mediate the homologous and heterologous regulation of this receptor.

Somatostatin initiates its actions via a family of seven-transmembrane domain receptors. Of the five somatostatin receptor genes cloned, sst2 exists as two splice variants with the sst2A isoform being predominantly expressed. This receptor is widely distributed in endocrine, exocrine, and neuronal cells, as well as in hormonally responsive tumors, and leads to inhibition of secretion, electrical excitability, and cell proliferation. To investigate the specificity of signal transduction by the sst2A receptor, we developed antibodies against two overlapping peptides located within the C terminus of the receptor protein: peptide 2C(SG), containing amino acids 334-348, and peptide 2C(ER), containing amino acids 339-359. Although antibodies to both peptides bound the inducing antigen with high affinity, only the antibodies against peptide 2C(ER) precipitated the receptor. The best antibody, R2-88, precipitated about 80% of the sst2A receptor-ligand complex solubilized from transfected CHO cells and was specific for the sst2A receptor isotype. Addition of GTPgammaS (10 microM) to the immunoprecipitated ligand-sst2A receptor complex markedly accelerated ligand dissociation, indicating that G proteins remained functionally associated with the receptor in the immunoprecipitate. Analysis of the G proteins coprecipitated with the sst2A receptor by immunoblotting with G protein antibodies showed that both G(alpha) and G(beta) subunits were bound to the hormone-receptor complex. Immunoprecipitation of the receptor was not affected by the presence of bound ligand. However, G protein subunits were coprecipitated only with the hormone-occupied receptor. Thus, the unoccupied receptor has low affinity for G proteins, and hormone binding stabilizes the receptor-G protein complex. Use of subtype-specific G protein antisera further showed that G alpha(i1), G alpha(i2), and G alpha(i3) were complexed with the sst2A receptor whereas Galpha(o), G alpha(z), and G alpha(q) were not. Together, these studies demonstrate that the sst2A receptor interacts selectively with G alpha(i) proteins in a hormone-dependent manner. The finding that this receptor couples to all three G alpha(i) subunits may help explain how somatostatin can regulate multiple signaling pathways.

The neuropeptide somatostatin (SRIF) triggers its biological effects by binding to high affinity membrane receptors. To develop a ligand useful for receptor affinity purification and localization, we have examined the ability of a novel monobiotinylated SRIF derivative to bind to receptors and streptavidin. Unlabeled [N-Biotinyl, Leu8, D-Trp22, Tyr25]SRIF28 (Bio-SRIF28) competed for [125I-Tyr11]SRIF binding to GH4C1 pituitary cell membranes with a Ki of 337 +/- 95 pM, comparable to that of native SRIF (193 +/- 16 pM). Studies using HPLC purified [125I]Bio-SRIF28 showed that equilibrium binding to membranes occurred within 120 min at 30 C and that the peptide-receptor complex dissociated slowly (t1/2 = 4.7 h). Analysis of saturation binding data gave an equilibrium dissociation constant for [125I]Bio-SRIF28 of 66 +/- 20 pM. Photoaffinity cross-linking of [125I]Bio-SRIF28 to membranes covalently labeled a broad 85 kDa band, as previously reported with the photolabile SRIF analog, [125I-Tyr11, Azidonitrobenzoyl-Lys4]SRIF. The binding of [125I]Bio-SRIF28 was potently inhibited by SRIF (Ki = 171 +/- 36 pM) and SRIF28 (299 +/- 102 pM) but not by structurally unrelated peptides. Furthermore, [125I]Bio-SRIF28 did not bind to membranes from GH(1)2C1 pituitary cells, which do not respond to SRIF and which lack [125I-Tyr11]SRIF binding sites. Finally, GppNHp and GTP gamma S both decreased [125I]Bio-SRIF28 binding whereas AppNHp did not. These studies showed that [125I]Bio-SRIF28 bound with high affinity to specific, G-protein coupled SRIF receptors. [125I]Bio-SRIF28 also bound with high affinity to streptavidin and this binding was very stable (t1/2 for dissociation = 19 h). Therefore, the affinity of the receptor for the Bio-SRIF28-streptavidin complex was determined by measuring the potency with which this preformed complex competed for [125I-Tyr11]SRIF binding. The Ki of the Bio-SRIF28-streptavidin complex (1110 +/- 47 pM) was only 3 times higher than that of uncomplexed Bio-SRIF28 (Ki = 337 +/- 95 pM). Dissociation of the [125I]Bio-SRIF28-streptavidin complex from receptors was slow (t1/2 = 3.9 h) but was increased over 200-fold by 1 microM GTP gamma S (t1/21 min). These data show that Bio-SRIF28 was able to bind simultaneously and with high affinity both to SRIF receptors and to streptavidin to form a stable ternary complex. Further, receptor binding of the Bio-SRIF28-streptavidin complex could be regulated by the addition of guanine nucleotides. Thus, Bio-SRIF28 should be useful for the affinity purification and in situ localization of SRIF receptors.

S OMATOSTATIN is a physiologically important inhibitor of growth hormone (GH) release and also reduces the secretion of prolactin and thyrotropin in specific circumstances.‘.’ Early studies of somatostatin action in primary cultures of pituitary cells indicated that the mechanisms by which this peptide inhibited hormone secretion were complex and probably involved multiple intracellular messengers.‘-‘-’ However, these mechanisms proved difficult to identify in primary pituitary cell cultures because the presence of multiple target cells precluded the measurement of intracellular messengers in any one cell type. Thus, we turned to the clonal GHJZ, rat pituitary cell line to examine the biochemical events involved in somatostatin inhibition of pituitary hormone release.4,5 The effects of somatostatin on GH and prolactin secretion in GH4C’ cells parallel its actions in estrogen primed rat pituitary cells both in primary culture and in viv~.~-* In addition, this cell line provides an experimental system with several major advantages for the study of somatostatin action. First, because GH.+C’ cells are clonal in origin, both hormonal and biochemical responses are produced by the same population of target cells and can be quantitatively correlated. Second, changes in intracellular messenger concentration can be detected with greater sensitivity in such a homogeneous population because they are not obscured by basal levels present in nonresponsive cell types. Finally, GH4C’ cell cultures are easier to prepare and maintain than primary pituitary cell cultures. The aim of our studies has been to identify the transduction mechanisms activated by occupancy of somatostatin receptors and to determine how these m~hanisms produce the biological response.

The neuropeptide somatostatin inhibits prolactin release from GH4C1 pituitary cells via two mechanisms, inhibition of stimulated adenylate cyclase activity and an undefined cAMP-independent process. Somatostatin also hyperpolarizes GH4C1 cells and reduces their intracellular free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) in a cAMP-independent manner. To determine whether these ionic changes were involved in the cAMP-independent mechanism by which somatostatin inhibited secretion, changes in cAMP levels were prevented from having any biological consequences by performing experiments in the presence of a maximal concentration of a cAMP analog. Under these conditions, inhibition of prolactin release by somatostatin required a transmembrane concentration gradient for K+ but not one for either Na+ or Cl-. However, elimination of the outward K+ gradient did not prevent somatostatin inhibition of vasoactive intestinal peptide-stimulated hormone release. Therefore, somatostatin's cAMP-mediated mechanism does not require a K+ gradient, whereas its cAMP-independent inhibition of secretion appears to result from a change in K+ conductance. Consistent with this conclusion, membrane hyperpolarization with gramicidin (1 microgram/ml) mimicked somatostatin inhibition of prolactin release. In addition, the K+ channel blocker tetrabutylammonium prevented the effects of somatostatin on the membrane potential, the [Ca2+]i and hormone secretion. Nonetheless, a K+ gradient was not sufficient for somatostatin action. Even in the presence of a normal K+ gradient, somatostatin was only able to inhibit prolactin release when the extracellular Ca2+ concentration was at least twice the [Ca2+]i. Furthermore, the calcium channel blocker, nifedipine (10 microM), which prevents the action of somatostatin to reduce the [Ca2+]i, specifically blocked inhibition of prolactin release via somatostatin's cAMP-independent mechanisms. Therefore, a decrease in Ca2+ influx through voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels produces both the fall in [Ca2+]i and inhibition of hormone secretion in response to somatostatin.

Functional receptors for the neuropeptide somatostatin have previously been characterized in a clonal line (GH4C1) of rat pituitary tumour cells. We have utilized GH4C1 cell receptors to develop a radioreceptor assay for the measurement of somatostatinlike activity in biological samples. The concentration of somatostatinlike activity was determined in various regions of the rat central nervous system by both radioreceptor assay and two radioimmunoassays. For all tissue samples tested, less somatostatinlike activity was measured by radioreceptor assay than by radioimmunoassay. Furthermore, the ratio of the measured activity in the two assays varied from 0.31 to 0.76. It is likely that these differences are at least partially due to the different affinities of GH4C1 cell receptors and the two antibodies for somatostatin-14 and somatostatin-28 which are both present in the rat central nervous system.

GH4C1 cells, a clonal strain of rat pituitary tumor cells which synthesize and secrete PRL and GH, have specific functional receptors for the two hypothalamic peptides TRH and somatostatin (SRIF). Chronic treatment of GH4C1 cells with cortisol has previously been shown to increase the number of TRH receptors per GH4C1 cell. The results reported here demonstrate that cortisol also causes a 20–40% decrease in the specific binding of [125I-Tyr1]SRIF. Treatment of GH4C1 cells with 5 × 10-6 M cortisol caused a time-dependent decrease in [125I-Tyr1]SRIF-specific binding. A maximal effect was achieved after 8 h of treatment, and the effect persisted for at least 48 h. Receptor affinity was the same in control and cortisol-pretreated cells (Kd = 7.8 × 10-10 M), but the number of SRIF-binding sites decreased from 21,900 to 15,20 receptors/cell. The half-maximal decrease in [125I-Tyr1]SRIF-specific binding occurred with 3 × 10-8 M cortisol. Pretreatment of cells with 5 × 10-7 M dexamethasone(1,4-pregnadien-9-fluoro...

The hypothalamic peptide vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) has been shown to stimulate the secretion of several pituitary hormones in vivo and PRL in vitro. We have examined the effects of VIP on ACTH and endorphin secretion by AtT20/D 16 v (D16) cells, a clonal strain of mouse pituitary tumor cells, and by primary cultures of rat pituitary cells. The addition of 100 nM VIP to D16 cells stimulated ACTH and endorphin secretion within 10 min, and stimulation continued for at least 24 h. However, treatment of cultures with VIP for18 h had no effect on the amount of [35S]methionine incorporated into immunoprecipitable ACTH precursors during a 15- min pulse. Therefore, VIP acts primarily to stimulate the release of presynthesized intracellular hormones and not to alter proopiocortin synthesis. VIP stimulation of ACTH and endorphin release was dose dependent and biphasic. In the first phase, halfmaximal stimulation occurred with 1.6 ± 0.9 nM VIP and remained constant at 5.6-fold above control values with 10–1...

The GH4C1 pituitary cell line contains specific plasma membrane receptors for the inhibitory neuropeptide somatostatin (SRIF). Unlike other peptides which bind to cell surface receptors on these cells, SRIF is not rapidly internalized via receptor-mediated endocytosis. Here we examined the effects of chronic SRIF pretreatment on the subsequent ability of GH4C1 cells to bind and respond to this hormone. Treatment of cells with 100 nM SRIF increased [125I-Tyr1]SRIF binding to a maximum value of 220% of control after 20 h. Scatchard analysis demonstrated that the number, but not the affinity, of the receptors was altered. The effect of SRIF was dose-dependent (ED50 = 2.3 +/- 0.4 nM), was not mimicked by an inactive analog, and was specific for the SRIF receptor. Furthermore, pretreatment of cells with other agents, which mimic SRIF's action to decrease intracellular cAMP and free Ca2+ concentrations, did not mimic the SRIF-induced increase in receptor number. Thus, occupancy of the SRIF receptor was required for SRIF receptor up-regulation. Inhibition of protein synthesis with cycloheximide did not prevent the SRIF-induced increase in receptors, consistent with an effect of SRIF to either reduce receptor degradation or cause slow redistribution of preexisting receptors to the plasma membrane. In contrast to the effects on receptor binding, pretreating cells with SRIF did not alter either basal cAMP levels or the potency of SRIF to inhibit cAMP accumulation (ED50 = 0.5 +/- 0.2 nM). However, the maximum cAMP produced by stimulators of adenylyl cyclase was increased. The observation that chronic SRIF exposure did not cause homologous desensitization in GH4C1 cells and increased rather than decreased SRIF receptor number is consistent with the fact that this neuropeptide is not rapidly internalized by receptor-mediated endocytosis.

The neuropeptide somatostatin causes membrane hyperpolarization and reduces the intracellular free calcium ion concentration ([Ca2+]i) in GH pituitary cells. In this study, we have used the fluorescent dyes bisoxonol (bis,-(1,3-diethylthiobarbiturate)-trimethineoxonol) and quin2 to elucidate the mechanisms by which these ionic effects are triggered. Addition of 100 nM somatostatin to GH4C1 cells caused a 3.4 mV hyperpolarization and a 26% decrease in [Ca2+]i within 30 s. These effects were not accompanied by changes in intracellular cAMP concentrations and occurred in cells containing either basal or maximally elevated cAMP levels. To determine which of the major permeant ions were involved in these actions of somatostatin, we examined its ability to elicit changes in the membrane potential and the [Ca2+]i when the transmembrane concentration gradients for Na+, Cl-, Ca2+, and K+ were individually altered. Substitution of impermeant organic ions for Na+ or Cl- did not block either the hyperpolarization or the decrease in [Ca2+]i induced by somatostatin. Decreasing extracellular Ca2+ from 1 mM to 250 nM abolished the reduction in [Ca2+]i but did not prevent the hyperpolarization response. These results show that hyperpolarization was not primarily due to changes in the conductances of Na+, Cl-, or Ca2+. Although the somatostatin-induced decrease in [Ca2+]i did require Ca2+ influx, it was independent of changes in Na+ or Cl- conductance. In contrast, elevating the extracellular [K+] from 4.6 to 50 mM completely blocked both the somatostatin-induced hyperpolarization and the reduction in [Ca2+]i. Furthermore, hyperpolarization of the cells with gramicidin mimicked the effect of somatostatin to decrease the [Ca2+]i and prevented any additional effect by the hormone. These results indicate that somatostatin increases a K+ conductance, which hyperpolarizes GH4C1 cells, and thereby secondarily decreases Ca2+ influx. Since the somatostatin-induced decrease in [Ca2+]i is independent of changes in intracellular cAMP levels, it may be responsible for somatostatin inhibition of hormone secretion by its cAMP-independent mechanism.

GH4C1 cells, a clonal strain of rat pituitary tumor cells, have high-affinity, functional receptors for the inhibitory hypothalamic peptide somatostatin (SRIF) and for epidermal growth factor (EGF). In this study we have examined the events that follow the initial binding of SRIF to its specific plasma membrane receptors in GH4C1 cells and have compared the processing of receptor-bound SRIF with that of EGF. When cells were incubated with [125I-Tyr1]SRIF at temperatures ranging from 4 to 37 degrees C, greater than 80% of the specifically bound peptide was removed by extraction with 0.2 M acetic acid, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 2.5. In contrast, the subcellular distribution of receptor-bound 125I-EGF was temperature dependent. Whereas greater than 95% of specifically bound 125I-EGF was removed by acid treatment after a 4 degrees C binding incubation, less than 10% was removed when the binding reaction was performed at 22 or 37 degrees C. In pulse-chase experiments, receptor-bound 125I-EGF was transferred from an acid-sensitive to an acid-resistant compartment with a half-time of 2 min at 37 degrees C. In contrast, the small amount of [125I-Tyr1]SRIF that was resistant to acid treatment did not increase during a 2-h chase incubation at 37 degrees C. Chromatographic analysis of the radioactivity released from cells during dissociation incubations at 37 degrees C showed that greater than 90% of prebound 125I-EGF was released as 125I-tyrosine, whereas prebound [125I-Tyr1]SRIF was released as a mixture of intact peptide (55%) and 125I-tyrosine (45%). Neither chloroquine (0.1 mM), ammonium chloride (20 mM), nor leupeptin (0.1 mg/ml) increased the amount of [125I-Tyr1]SRIF bound to cells at 37 degrees C. Furthermore, chloroquine and leupeptin did not alter the rate of dissociation or degradation of prebound [125I-Tyr1]SRIF. In contrast, these inhibitors increased the amount of cell-associated 125I-EGF during 37 degrees C binding incubations and decreased the subsequent rate of release of 125I-tyrosine. The results presented indicate that, as in other cell types, EGF underwent rapid receptor-mediated endocytosis in GH4C1 cells and was subsequently degraded in lysosomes. In contrast, SRIF remained at the cell surface for several hours although it elicits its biological effects within minutes. Furthermore, a constant fraction of the receptor-bound [125I-Tyr1]SRIF was degraded at the cell surface before dissociation. Therefore, after initial binding of [125I-Tyr1]SRIF and 125I-EGF to their specific membrane receptors, these peptides are processed very differently in GH4C1 cells.

Bombesin (BBS) has been previously shown to stimulate the secretion of PRL and GH in steroid-primed rats. To determine whether these effects were mediated by the central nervous system or were due to direct action on the pituitary gland, we studied the interaction of BBS with GH4C1 cells, a clonal strain of rat pituitary cells which synthesizes and secretes PRL and GH. The addition of 100 nM BBS to GH4C1 cells for 60 min increased PRL release to 140 +/- 3% of the control value (mean +/- SE) and GH release to 133 +/- 5% of the control value. Stimulation of hormone secretion was observed within 15 min of treatment with 100 nM BBS and continued for at least 2 h. Half-maximal stimulation of PRL release occurred with 0.5 nM BBS, and a maximal effect was observed with 10 nM peptide. The BBS analogs ranatensin, litorin, and [Tyr4]BBS, each at a concentration of 100 nM, caused the same stimulation of PRL release as maximal concentrations of BBS itself. BBS stimulated hormone release selectively in two of five different clonal pituitary cell strains examined. Pretreatment of GH4C1 cells with 1 nM estradiol and/or 100 nM insulin resulted in more powerful stimulation of PRL release by both TRH and BBS. When epidermal growth factor and vasoactive intestinal peptide were added simultaneously with BBS, PRL release was greater than in the presence of either peptide alone. In contrast, the stimulatory effects of TRH and BBS were not additive. Somatostatin inhibited both basal and stimulated PRL release. Thus, low concentrations of BBS can directly stimulate PRL and GH release by a clonal pituitary cell strain in culture. These results suggest that BBS may stimulate PRL and GH secretion in vivo by direct action on the pituitary gland.

Somatostatin (SRIF) is a hypothalamic tetradecapeptide which acts on several different types of pituitary cells to inhibit hormone release both in vivo and in vitro. We have previously shown that the GH4C1 clonal strain of rat pituitary tumor cells contains a single class of specific high-affinity SRIF receptors and that SRIF is a potent inhibitor of GH and PRL release by these cells. In this study, we have determined the relationship between the apparent binding affinity and biological potency of 19 SRIF analogs in GH4C1 cells. Receptor binding and biological activity were assayed under identical conditions. A good correlation (r = 0.96) was observed over a 10,000-fold range between the receptor binding affinities and biological potencies of SRIF analogs. Modifications at the C- and N-terminal regions of the SRIF molecule had minimal effects on binding to the receptor or potency to inhibit PRL release. However, substitution of residues 6 through 10 or reduction of the disulfide bond resulted in a 100-fold or greater decrease in both activities. The N-terminal extended SRIF analogs, SRIF-28, [D-Trp22]SRIF-28, and SRIF-25, were all somewhat less potent than SRIF. These results strongly support the involvement of the characterized SRIF receptor in initiating the biological actions of SRIF in GH4C1 cells and define the structural features of the SRIF molecule required for both receptor binding and activation.

GH4C1 cells are a clonal strain of rat pituitary tumor cells which synthesize and secrete prolactin and growth hormone. Somatostatin, a hypothalamic tetradecapeptide, inhibits the release of growth hormone and, under certain circumstances, also prolactin from normal pituitary cells. We have prepared [125I-Tyr1]somatostatin (approximately 2200 C1/mmol) and have shown that this ligand binds to a limited number of high affinity sites on GH4C1 cells. Half-maximal binding of somatostatin occurred at a concentration of 6 x 10(-10) M. A maximum of 0.11 pmol of [125I-Tyr1]somatostatin was bound per mg of cell protein, equivalent to 13,000 receptor sites per cell. The rate constant for binding (kon) was 8 x 10(7) M(-1) min(-1). The rate constant for dissociation (koff) was determined by direct measurement to be 0.02 min(-1) both in the presence and absence of excess nonradioactive somatostatin. Binding of [125I-Tyr1]somatostatin was not inhibited by 10(-7) M thyrotropin-releasing hormones. Substance P, neurotensin, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, calcitonin, adrenocorticotropin, or insulin. Of seven nonpituitary cell lines tested, none had specific receptors for somatostatin. Somatostatin was shown to inhibit prolactin and growth hormone production by CH4C1 cells. The dose-response characteristics for binding and the biological actions of somatostatin were essentially coincident. Furthermore, among several clonal pituitary cell strains tested, only those which had receptors for somatostatin showed a biological response to the hormone. We conclude that the characterized somatostatin receptor is necessary for the biological actions of somatostatin on GH4C1 cells.

GH(4)C(1) cells are a clonal strain of rat pituitary cells that synthesize and secrete prolactin and growth hormone. Chronic treatment (longer than 24 h) of GH(4)C(1) cells with epidermal growth factor (EGF) (10(-8) M) decreased by 30-40 percent both the rate of cell proliferation and the plateau density reached by cultures. Inhibition of cell proliferation was accompanied by a change in cellular morphology from a spherical appearance to an elongated flattened shape and by a 40-60 percent increase in cell volume. These actions of EGF were qualitatively similar to those of the hypothalamic tripeptide thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) (10(-7) M) which decreased the rate of cell proliferation by 10-20 percent and caused a 15 percent increase in cell volume. The presence of supramaximal concentrations of both EGF (10(-8)M) and TRH (10(-7)M) resulted in greater effects on cell volume and cell multiplication than either peptide alone. EGF also altered hormone production by GH(4)C(1) cells in the same manner as TRH. Treatment of cultures with 10(-8) M EGF for 2-6 d increased prolactin synthesis five- to ninefold compared to a two- to threefold stimulation by 10(-7) M TRH. Growth hormone production by the same cultures was inhibited 40 percent by EGF and 15 percent by TRH. The half- maximal effect of EGF to increase prolactin synthesis, decrease growth hormone production, and inhibit cell proliferation occurred at a concentration of 5 x 10 (-11) M. Insulin and multiplication stimulating activity, two other growth factors tested, did not alter cell proliferation, cell morphology, or hormone production by GH(4)C(1) cells, indicating the specificity of the EGF effect. Fibroblast growth factor, however, had effects similar to those of EGF and TRH. Of five pituitary cell strains tested, all but one responded to chronic EGF treatment with specifically altered hormone production. Acute chronic EGF treatment with specifically altered hormone production. Acute treatment (30 min) of GH(4)C(1) cells with 10(-8) M EGF caused a 30 percent enhancement of prolactin release compared to a greater than twofold increase caused by 10(-7) M TRH. Therefore, although EGF and TRH have qualitatively similar effects on GH(4)C(1) cells, their powers to affect hormone release acutely or hormone synthesis and cell proliferation chronically are distinct.

The neuropeptide somatostatin inhibits hormone release from GH4C1 pituitary cells via two mechanisms: inhibition of stimulated adenylate cyclase and a cAMP-independent process. To determine whether both mechanisms involve the guanyl nucleotide-binding protein Ni, we used pertussis toxin, which ADP-ribosylates Ni and thereby blocks its function. Pertussis toxin treatment of GH4C1 cells blocked somatostatin inhibition of both vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-stimulated cAMP accumulation and prolactin secretion. In membranes prepared from toxin-treated cells, somatostatin inhibition of VIP-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity was reduced and 125I-Tyr1-somatostatin binding was decreased more than 95%. In contrast, pertussis toxin did not affect the biological actions or the membrane binding of thyrotropin-releasing hormone. These results indicate that ADP-ribosylated Ni cannot interact with occupied somatostatin receptors and that somatostatin inhibits VIP-stimulated adenylate cyclase via Ni. To investigate somatostatin's cAMP-independent mechanism, we used depolarizing concentrations of K+ to stimulate prolactin release without altering intracellular cAMP levels. Measurement of Quin-2 fluorescence showed that 11 mM K+ increased intracellular [Ca2+] within 5 s. Somatostatin caused an immediate, but transient, decrease in both basal and K+-elevated [Ca2+]. Consistent with these findings, somatostatin inhibited K+-stimulated prolactin release, also without affecting intracellular cAMP concentrations. Pertussis toxin blocked the somatostatin-induced reduction of [Ca2+]. Furthermore, the toxin antagonized somatostatin inhibition of K+-stimulated and VIP-stimulated secretion with the same potency (ED50 = 0.3 ng/ml). These results indicate that pertussis toxin acts at a common site to prevent somatostatin inhibition of both Ca2+- and cAMP-stimulated hormone release. Thus, Ni appears to be required for somatostatin to decrease both cAMP production and [Ca2+] and to inhibit the actions of secretagogues using either of these intracellular messengers.

Bombesin is a tetradecapeptide which stimulates prolactin secretion in rats and man and in cultures of GH4C1 cells, a clonal strain of rat pituitary tumor cells. We have utilized [125I-Tyr4]bombesin to identify and characterize specific high affinity receptors in GH4C1 cells. Scatchard analysis of equilibrium binding data at 4 degrees C indicated the presence of a single class of non-interacting binding sites for bombesin (RT = 3600 +/- 500 sites/cell). The value for the equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd = 1.2 +/- 0.4 nM) agreed closely with the ED50 (0.5 nM) for bombesin stimulation of prolactin release. [125I-Tyr4]Bombesin binding at steady state at 37 degrees C was inhibited by increasing concentrations of unlabeled bombesin in a dose-dependent manner, with an ID50 = 1.4 +/- 0.2 nM. However, binding of [125I-Tyr4] bombesin was not inhibited by 100 nM thyrotropin-releasing hormone, vasoactive intestinal peptide, epidermal growth factor, or somatostatin. Therefore, [125I-Tyr4]bombesin binds to a receptor distinct from the receptors for other peptides which regulate hormone secretion by GH4C1 cells. The analog specificity for high affinity binding showed that the receptors for bombesin recognize the COOH-terminal octapeptide sequence in the molecule. Among five pituitary cell strains tested, two which contained saturable binding sites for [125I-Tyr4]bombesin (GH4C1 and GH3) had previously been shown to respond to bombesin with increased hormone secretion, whereas three which lacked receptors (GC, F4C1, and AtT20/D16v) were unresponsive. Therefore, the [125I-Tyr4]bombesin binding sites appear to be necessary for the biological actions of bombesin. Examination of the processing and metabolism of receptor-bound peptide demonstrated that at 4 degrees C [125I-Tyr4]bombesin binds to receptors on the surface of GH4C1 cells. At 37 degrees C, receptor-bound peptide is rapidly internalized and subsequently degraded in lysosomes. In summary, we have characterized for the first time specific, high affinity pituitary bombesin receptors which are necessary for the biological action of bombesin.

Somatostatin (SRIF) inhibits vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-stimulated cAMP accumulation in the GH4C1 strain of rat pituitary tumor cells, and this effect is responsible for SRIF inhibition of VIP-stimulated hormone release. In this study we examined the interaction between the SRIF receptor and adenylate cyclase in GH4C1 cell membranes. Maximal concentrations of VIP (50 nM) increased membrane adenylate cyclase activity 4.2-fold; half-maximal stimulation was observed with 0.75 nM VIP. SRIF noncompetitively inhibited the stimulatory effect of VIP, but it did not alter basal adenylate cyclase activity. The relative potencies of SRIF and two SRIF analogs as inhibitors of VIP-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in membranes and of VIP-stimulated cAMP accumulation in intact cells were similar. Furthermore, the concentration of SRIF that caused half-maximal inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity (ED50 = 2.3 nM) was close to the equilibrium dissociation constant for SRIF (Kd = 0.40 nM) measured in membrane preparations in the presence of GTP. Therefore, SRIF inhibition of adenylate cyclase appears to be receptor mediated. As with receptors known to regulate adenylate cyclase by interaction with a guanine nucleotide regulatory subunit, SRIF receptor binding was decreased in the presence of guanine nucleotides. Addition of GTP (150 microM) or the nonhydrolyzable GTP analog guanyl-5'-yl-imidodiphosphate (100 microM) decreased the specific binding of [125I-Tyr1]SRIF to 31% and 13% of the control value, respectively. This decrease in specific binding was due entirely to decreased receptor affinity for SRIF. GTP (150 microM) increased the equilibrium dissociation constant for SRIF from 0.11 to 0.40 nM, whereas the number of binding sites was unaffected by the nucleotide (Bmax = 0.2 pmol/mg protein). Analysis of dissociation kinetics demonstrated that in the absence of guanyl nucleotides, the rate of [125I-Tyr1]SRIF dissociation was first order (t 1/2 = 180 min). However, in the presence of a half-maximal concentration of guanyl-5'-yl-imidodiphosphate (0.3 microM), [125I-Tyr1]SRIF dissociation occurred with biphasic kinetics. Fifty percent of the specifically bound peptide dissociated at the same rate as that observed in the absence of nucleotide, whereas the remainder dissociated 15 times more rapidly (t 1/2 = 9.6 min).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Previous studies with heterogeneous populations of pancreatic cells have provided evidence for the presence of somatostatin (SRIF) receptors in cytosol and secretion vesicles, as well as the plasma membrane. To examine the distribution of SRIF receptors between soluble and membrane fractions in a homogeneous pancreatic islet cell population, we have used the clonal RINm5F insulinoma cell line. These cells contain specific, high affinity binding sites for [125I-Try11]SRIF on the cell surface, and occupancy of these sites by SRIF and SRIF analogs correlates with inhibition of insulin secretion. Stable, steady state binding was achieved using both intact cells and membranes by performing binding incubations with [25I-Tyr11]SRIF at 22 C. Half-maximal inhibition of [125I-Tyr11]SRIF binding occurred with 0.21 +/- 0.11 nM SRIF in membranes and 0.35 +/- 0.30 nM SRIF in cells. In contrast, the binding of [125I-Tyr11]SRIF to cytosolic macromolecules was not reduced by concentrations of SRIF as high as 100 nM, demonstrating that this binding was of much lower affinity. RINm5F membranes were further purified using a Percoll gradient to prepare a microsomal fraction, which was enriched in adenylate cyclase activity, and a secretory granule fraction, which was enriched in insulin. [125I-Tyr11]SRIF binding to the microsomal fraction (3.8 +/- 0.3 fmol/mg) was 3 times higher than to secretion granules (1.2 +/- 0.2 fmol/mg). Thus, high affinity SRIF binding sites were most abundant in microsomal membranes and were low or undetectable in secretory granules and cytosol. To determine whether translocation of SRIF receptors to the plasma membrane accompanied insulin secretion, we examined the effects of various insulin secretagogues on [125I-Tyr11]SRIF binding to intact cells. Leucine (20 mM), glyceraldehyde (15 mM), forskolin (1 microM), and glucagon (1 microM) stimulated insulin release 1.5- to 4.0-fold in different experiments. However, these secretagogues did not increase [125I-Tyr11]SRIF binding. In summary, our results indicate that high affinity SRIF receptors in RINm5F cells are located primarily on the plasma membrane and that the concentration of SRIF receptors at the cell surface is independent of the secretory activity of the cells.

Somatostatin (SRIF) inhibits both basal and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-stimulated hormone secretion by the GH4C1 clonal strain of rat pituitary tumor cells. We have previously shown that SRIF inhibits cAMP accumulation stimulated by VIP but does not alter basal cAMP levels in this cell line. To determine the importance of changes in cAMP accumulation in the mechanism of SRIF action, we have compared the effect of SRIF on hormone release stimulated by VIP and two other secretagogues which increase effective intracellular cAMP concentrations: forskolin and 8-Bromo-cAMP (8-Br-cAMP). VIP stimulated GH and PRL secretion to the same maximal extent (220% of control) with similar ED50 values (0.37 +/- 0.03 and 0.43 +/- 0.08 nM, mean +/- SE, respectively). SRIF (100 nM) reduced maximal VIP-stimulation of both GH and PRL release from 220 to 140% of control; however, it did not significantly change the ED50 values for VIP. The effect of SRIF on VIP-stimulated hormone release parallels its action on VIP-stimulated cAMP accumulation. Furthermore, the concentrations of SRIF required to produce half-maximal inhibition of VIP-stimulated GH and PRL release (0.8 +/- 0.2 nM and 0.7 +/- 0.1 nM, respectively) were similar to its potency to inhibit VIP-stimulated cAMP accumulation (1.2 +/- 0.1 nM). These data indicate that changes in cAMP levels mediate inhibition of VIP-stimulated hormone secretion by SRIF. Forskolin increased cAMP accumulation with an ED50 value of 2.4 +/- 0.5 microM. A maximal concentration of forskolin (100 microM) stimulated cAMP accumulation to a greater extent than 100 nM VIP (34 +/- 4-fold vs. 9 +/- 1-fold). Together, forskolin (100 microM) and VIP (100 nM) stimulated cAMP accumulation by more than 50-fold. However, PRL secretion in response to maximal concentrations of VIP or forskolin individually or together were the same (approximately 200% of control). These results support the conclusion that both compounds stimulate PRL secretion by a cAMP-mediated mechanism which can be fully activated by either one alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Although purine nucleosides have been shown to regulate the secretion of several peptide and steroid hormones, effects on pituitary hormone release have not been reported. We show here that in the clonal GH4C1 pituitary cell line maximal concentrations of adenosine (greater than or equal to 50 microM) inhibited PRL and GH secretion by 40%. Adenosine deaminase abolished the inhibitory effect of adenosine but not that of SRIF or (-)N6(R-2-phenylisopropyl)adenosine (PIA), a nonhydrolyzable adenosine analog. Furthermore, this enzyme increased basal secretion by 50%, and analysis of the incubation medium by HPLC demonstrated that the cells secreted biologically effective concentrations of adenosine. These results indicate that adenosine produced in culture tonically inhibits hormone release. In other target cells, adenosine inhibition is mediated by two types of binding sites: an extracellular Ri-site requiring an intact ribose moiety or an intracellular P-site requiring an intact purine ring. Four lines of evidence indicate that in GH4C1 cells, adenosine acts at an Ri-site. PIA, an Ri-site-specific agonist, was a potent inhibitor of hormone release (ED50 = 30 nM). Theophylline, an Ri-site antagonist, competitively inhibited the action of PIA (Ki = 2.4 microM). 3) 2'5'-Dideoxyadenosine, a P-site-specific agonist, did not inhibit PRL release even at a concentration of 1 mM. 4) Dipyridamole, an adenosine uptake inhibitor, did not reduce adenosine inhibition. In addition to its effect on basal secretion, PIA inhibited stimulation of hormone release by vasoactive intestinal peptide and TRH. PIA also reduced vasoactive intestinal peptide-stimulated cAMP accumulation by 75%, consistent with its action to inhibit adenylate cyclase via Ri receptors in other targets. Since PIA inhibition of PRL release and cAMP accumulation was not additive with the effects of SRIF and carbamyl choline, these inhibitors may act via a common rate-limiting step. Our results demonstrate that adenosine activates an Ri-type of adenosine receptor in GH4C1 cells and that the production of adenosine under normal culture conditions causes autocrine inhibition of secretion.

Somatostatin (SRIF) has previously been shown to inhibit both basal and hormone-stimulated PRL secretion from GH4C1 cells, a clonal strain of rat pituitary tumor cells. In this study we examined the ability of SRIF to modulate cAMP accumulation in GH4C1 cells to determine whether such alterations mediate its biological effects. SRIF did not cause statistically significant changes in basal cAMP accumulation. Of six PRL secretagogues examined, only vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) increased cAMP accumulation significantly: TRH, bombesin, epidermal growth factor, insulin, and the tumor promoter, phorbol-12,13-dibutyrate were without effect. When SRIF was added simultaneously with VIP, it inhibited maximal VIP-stimulated cAMP accumulation (55 +/- 3%, mean +/- SE) without changing the ED50 for VIP (3.0 +/- 0.2 nM). Inhibition by SRIF was not due to altered kinetics of VIP stimulation, since the half-time for VIP-stimulated cAMP accumulation was 2 min both in the absence and presence of 100 nM SRIF. SRIF did not inhibit isobutylmethylxanthine-stimulated cAMP accumulation, and the presence of 0-10 mM isobutylmethylxanthine did not alter the inhibitory effect of SRIF on VIP-stimulated cAMP accumulation. Therefore, SRIF must act primarily to modulate VIP activation of adenylate cyclase activity. Inhibition of VIP-stimulated cAMP accumulation occurred at concentrations of SRIF (ID50 = 1.2 +/- 0.1 nM) close to the equilibrium dissociation constant for receptor binding (Kd = 0.6 +/- 0.2 nM). Furthermore, the potencies of a series of SRIF analogs to inhibit VIP-stimulated cAMP accumulation correlated with the apparent Kd of each peptide for binding to the SRIF receptor. In addition, SRIF did not reduce VIP-stimulated cAMP accumulation in GH(1)2C1 cells, which lack SRIF receptors. We conclude that SRIF inhibits VIP-stimulated cAMP accumulation by a receptor-mediated process that may be causally related to the ability of SRIF to inhibit VIP-dependent PRL secretion.