Search

Aims/Introduction This study aimed to investigate whether insulin resistance (IR) in individuals with type 2 diabetes undergoing intensive glycemic control determines the extent of improvement in neuropathy. Materials and Methods This was an exploratory substudy of an open‐label, randomized controlled trial of individuals with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes treated with exenatide and pioglitazone or insulin to achieve a glycated hemoglobin, This study shows that patients with type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance undergoing intensive glycemic control with pioglitazone plus exenatide or basal–bolus insulin show blunted small nerve fiber regeneration. Therefore, interventions, such as physical activity and weight reduction, to improve insulin resistance might benefit diabetic neuropathy, and insulin resistance should be considered when assessing the benefits of disease‐modifying therapies for diabetic neuropathy.

Aims/Introduction Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN) is associated with small nerve fiber degeneration and regeneration. This study investigated whether the presence of pDPN might influence nerve regeneration in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing intensive glycemic control. Materials and Methods This exploratory substudy of an open‐label randomized controlled trial undertook the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 questionnaire and assessment of electrochemical skin conductance, vibration perception threshold and corneal nerve morphology using corneal confocal microscopy in participants with and without pDPN treated with exenatide and pioglitazone or basal–bolus insulin at baseline and 1‐year follow up, and 18 controls at baseline only. Results Participants with type 2 diabetes, with (n = 13) and without (n = 28) pDPN had comparable corneal nerve fiber measures, electrochemical skin conductance and vibration perception threshold at baseline, and pDPN was not associated with the severity of DPN. There was a significant glycated hemoglobin reduction (P, There has been a resurgence of interest in identifying new drug targets or, predictive biomarkers of disease‐modifying therapies in diabetic neuropathy. We show that the presence of painful diabetic neuropathy was associated with greater corneal nerve regeneration and an improvement in painful neuropathic symptoms in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing intensive glycemic control.

AIM To examine the long-term efficacy of thiazolidinedione plus a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist versus basal-bolus insulin on glycaemic control and beta-cell function in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) on metformin plus sulphonylurea. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three hundred and thirty-one patients with poorly controlled T2D were recruited over 3 years and were followed for an additional year. Subjects received a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at baseline and at study end. After completing the baseline OGTT, subjects were randomized to receive either pioglitazone plus weekly exenatide (combination therapy) or basal/bolus insulin (insulin therapy) to maintain an HbA1c of less than 7.0%. The primary outcome of the study was the difference in HbA1c at study end between the two treatment groups. RESULTS Both therapies caused a robust decrease in HbA1c. However, combination therapy caused a greater decrement (-1.1%, P

IntroductionTo assess the effect of exenatide and pioglitazone or basal-bolus insulin on diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D).Research design and methodsThis is a substudy of the Qatar Study, an open-label, randomized controlled trial. 38 subjects with poorly controlled T2D were studied at baseline and 1-year follow-up and 18 control subjects were assessed at baseline only. A combination of exenatide (2 mg/week) and pioglitazone (30 mg/day) or glargine with aspart insulin were randomly assigned to patients to achieve an HbA1c ResultsSubjects with T2D had reduced corneal nerves, but other DPN measures were comparable with the control group. In the combination treatment arm (n=21), HbA1c decreased by 35.2 mmol/mol (3.8 %) (pConclusionsTreatment with exenatide and pioglitazone or basal-bolus insulin results in corneal nerve regeneration, but no change in neuropathic symptoms or sudomotor function over 1 year.

Because of the unique mechanism of action of sodium-glucose co-transport inhibitors (SGLT2i), which is independent of insulin secretion and insulin action, members of this class of drugs effectively lower plasma glucose concentration when used in combination with all other antidiabetic agents, including insulin. Increased plasma ketone concentration has been reported in association with SGLT2i initiation, which, under certain clinical conditions, has developed into diabetic ketoacidosis. The daily insulin dose often is reduced at the time of initiating SGLT2i therapy in insulin-treated patients to avoid hypoglycaemia. However, reduction of insulin dose can increase the risk of ketoacidosis. In the present study, we examined the effect of the addition of dapagliflozin plus pioglitazone on plasma ketone concentration in insulin-treated T2DM patients and compared the results to the effect of dapagliflozin alone. A total of 18 poorly controlled, insulin-treated T2DM participants in the Qatar Study received dapagliflozin (10 mg) plus pioglitazone (30 mg), and 10 poorly controlled non-insulin-treated T2DM patients received dapagliflozin (10 mg) alone for 4 months. Dapagliflozin plus pioglitazone produced a robust decrease in HbA1c (-1.4%) and resulted in a 50% reduction in daily insulin dose, from 133 to 66 units, while dapagliflozin alone caused a 0.8% reduction in HbA1c. Dapagliflozin caused a four-fold increase in fasting plasma ketone concentration, while the combination of pioglitazone plus dapagliflozin was not associated with a significant increase (0.13 vs 0.15 mM) in plasma ketone concentration or in risk of hypoglycaemia. These results demonstrate that the addition of pioglitazone to dapagliflozin prevents the increase in plasma ketone concentration associated with SGLT2i therapy.

Objective To examine the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with exenatide plus pioglitazone vs basal/bolus insulin in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with very high hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (>10%) receiving sulfonylurea plus metformin and with a long duration of disease. Design and participants Participants (n = 101) in the Qatar Study with very poor glycemic control (HbA1c >10%) and a long duration of diabetes (10.9 years) receiving maximum/near-maximum doses of sulfonylurea plus metformin were randomly assigned to receive pioglitazone plus weekly exenatide (combination therapy), or basal plus prandial insulin (insulin therapy), to maintain HbA1c Results Baseline HbA1c was 11.5% ± 0.2% and 11.2% ± 0.2% (P = not significant) in combination therapy and insulin therapy groups, respectively. At 6 months, combination therapy caused a robust decrease in HbA1c to 6.7% ± 0.1% (∆ = -4.8%) compared with 7.4% ± 0.1% (∆ = -3.8%) in subjects receiving insulin therapy. Combination therapy was effective in lowering the HbA1c independent of sex, ethnicity, or body mass index. Subjects in the insulin therapy group experienced significantly greater weight gain and a 2.5-fold higher rate of hypoglycemia compared with patients receiving combination therapy. Conclusion Exenatide/pioglitazone combination therapy is an effective and safe therapeutic option in patients with poorly controlled T2DM receiving metformin plus sulfonylurea with very high HbA1c (>10%).

Background: We previously demonstrated that addition of exenatide (EXEN) plus pioglitazone (PIO) in poorly controlled T2DM patients on maximal dose of metformin plus sulfonylurea produced a greater A1c reduction at 1 year than basal-bolus insulin. Here we report the 3-year follow-up data. Methods: 274 poorly controlled T2DM patients (age=56 y; BMI=31; Diabetes duration=11 y, HbA1c=10.1%) on maximal doses of metformin plus SU were randomized to receive: (1) Exenatide once weekly (2 mg) plus pioglitazone (n=142) or (2) basal (glargine)-bolus (aspart) insulin (n=132) to maintain HbA1c below 7%. Results: In subjects receiving EXEN + PIO, A1c decreased to 6.5% at 6 months, and remained at 6.6% after 36 months. With Insulin Therapy, A1c declined to 7.5% at 6 months and remained 7.3 at 36 months (P Conclusion: Addition of EXEN + PIO in poorly controlled T2DM patients on MET/SU produces greater and more durable HbA1c reduction with lower rate of hypoglycemia compared to Insulin Therapy. Disclosure M. Abdul-Ghani: None. O. Migahid: None. A. Megahed: None. M.F. Mohammad: None. R.A. DeFronzo: Speaker's Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Elcelyx Therapeutics, Inc., Intarcia Therapeutics, Inc.. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.. A. Jayyousi: None.

The present study aims to identify predictors for response to combination therapy with pioglitazone plus exenatide vs basal/bolus insulin therapy in T2DM patients who are poorly controlled with maximum/near-maximum doses of metformin plus a sulfonylurea. Participants in the Qatar study received a 75-g OGTT with measurement of plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide concentration at baseline and were then randomized to receive either treatment with pioglitazone plus exenatide or basal/bolus insulin therapy for one year. Insulin secretion measured with plasma C-peptide concentration during the OGTT was the strongest predictor of response to combination therapy (HbA1c ≤ 7.0%) with pioglitazone plus exenatide. A 54% increase in 2-hour plasma C-peptide concentration above the fasting level identified subjects who achieved the glycaemic goal (HbA1c < 7.0%) with 82% sensitivity and 79% specificity. Only baseline HbA1c was a predictor of response to basal/bolus insulin therapy. Thus, the increment in 2-hour plasma C-peptide concentration above the fasting level provides a useful tool to identify poorly controlled T2DM patients who can achieve glycaemic control without insulin therapy, and thereby, can be used to individualize antihyperglycaemic therapy in poorly controlled T2DM patients.

OBJECTIVE The Qatar Study was designed to examine the efficacy of combination therapy with exenatide plus pioglitazone versus basal/bolus insulin in patients with long-standing poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on metformin plus a sulfonylurea. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The study randomized 231 patients with poorly controlled (HbA1c >7.5%, 58 mmol/mol) T2DM on a sulfonylurea plus metformin to receive 1) pioglitazone plus weekly exenatide (combination therapy) or 2) basal plus prandial insulin (insulin therapy) to maintain HbA1c RESULTS After a mean follow-up of 12 months, combination therapy caused a robust decrease in HbA1c from 10.0 ± 0.6% (86 ± 5.2 mmol/mol) at baseline to 6.1 ± 0.1% (43 ± 0.7 mmol/mol) compared with 7.1 ± 0.1% (54 ± 0.8 mmol/mol) in subjects receiving insulin therapy. Combination therapy was effective in lowering the HbA1c independent of sex, ethnicity, BMI, or baseline HbA1c. Subjects in the insulin therapy group experienced significantly greater weight gain and a threefold higher rate of hypoglycemia than patients in the combination therapy group. CONCLUSIONS Combination exenatide/pioglitazone therapy is a very effective and safe therapeutic option in patients with long-standing poorly controlled T2DM on metformin plus a sulfonylurea.

In the above-mentioned article, Fig. 1 A was corrected (the colors in the panel were switched) to …