Search

Background: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) versus carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is well issue known, but the purpose of this study is to compare CAS versus CEA in terms of asymptomatic Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) demonstrated microembolic scattering of infarction and neuropsychological assessment impairment., Methods: We performed a prospective, observational, cohort study on 211 consecutive carotid revascularizations at our institution. Patients were divided into 2 different cohorts: CEA was performed in n = 116 patients (Group A); CAS was performed in n = 95 (Group B). Adverse events were collected at 30 days and 6 months postoperative. Differences in terms of DW-MRI demonstrated microembolic scattering of infarction were analyzed and considered significative for P ≤ 0.05. Secondary objectives were: major and minor stroke, neuropsychological assessment impairment, death, myocardial infarction (MI)., Results: CEA was associated with a significative decreased rate of asymptomatic DW-MRI demonstrated microembolic scattering of infarction (13.8% vs. 51%; P = 0.0001) and of 6 months neuropsychological assessments impairment (0.8 vs. 7.4) (P = 0.04) in asymptomatic patients. There was no significant difference between 2 groups in terms of comorbidities. Stroke rates were similar at 30 days (1.7% CEA vs. 4.1% CAS) and 6 months (2.6% CEA vs. 5.3% CAS P = 0.32). There were no differences in terms of central neurological events, death, transient ischemic attack, MI between the groups. The composite end point of stroke/death/MI at 6 months postoperatively was 2.6% vs. 6.3% (P = 0.19)., Conclusions: According to these results, CEA achieved better outcomes compared to patients treated by CAS with distal filter in terms of asymptomatic microembolic event and impairment National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scale and neuropsychological assessments. Limitations of the study lead to limited conclusions only in the specific population and not generalized. Further, comparative randomized studies are warranted., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Data from literature confirmed the non-trivial risk associated with carotid revascularization. The purpose of this study is to evaluate carotid endarterectomy (CEA) via a mini-invasive access (3-6 cm longitudinal) incision as a viable alternative to the traditional access via a cutaneous incision (˃6 cm) in terms of nerve sparing and neck pain/disability for patients., Methods: We performed a prospective, observational, cohort study on 796 consecutive patients who underwent CEAs. A number of 730 patients was included in the final analysis. Patients entered in two different cohorts: CEA with 3-6 cm incision was performed in N.=398 (Group A); CEA with>6 cm incision was performed in N.=398 (Group B). Entire data set is available from 382 in group A and 348 in group B. Adverse events were recorded at 30 days, 3 and 6 months after surgery. The primary purpose of this study was to identify the incidence of cranial nerve injuries and related pain (by Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire [NPq]) in both groups. Differences between groups were exploratory, only, and considered significative for P≤0.05. Secondary objectives were: death, major and minor stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI) and main duration of operation., Results: The cumulative incidence of transient deficit of peripheral nerve in group A was 1.7% at 30 days and 19.4% in group B (RR: 0.10, 95% CI 0.07-0.1, P=0.0001) suggesting a possible benefit from mini-skin incision on nerve injuries reduction. Cranial nerve permanent injuries were identified in 0.17% of mini-incision group and 0.23% of standard group. Exploratory comparison did not demonstrate significative differences between the groups (RR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.19-2.71, P=0.63). The median NPq postoperative score was 40% in GROUP A and 79% in GROUP B (exploratory difference 39%, 95% CI 32.22-45.20%, P=0.0001, χ 2 : 114.007). At 6 months, NPq was 20% and 42%, respectively; exploratory differences were still present. The need to prolong the mini-incision in GROUP A to preserve the surgical outcome was 1.3%, only., Conclusions: According to these results the mini skin incision allows a sufficient vessels exposure for dissection, endarterectomy, reconstruction of carotid artery and shunt positioning, minimizing surgical invasiveness, decreasing the incidence of temporary cervical nerve dysfunction and improving the aesthetic result with significative less pain suffered by the patients. Transverse cervical and great auricular nerves sparing decreased postoperative hypo-paresthesia in the neck, improving patient's satisfaction. These data suggest that this procedure can be considered safe. Exploratory analysis suggested that it could possibly be considered a safety alternative to standard carotid endarterectomy. A randomized controlled trial is ongoing for definitive conclusions.

Aim: Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting (CAS) has emerged as an alternative treatment for extra cranial carotid artery stenosis in stroke prevention. Nevertheless concerns are remaining about the long-term durability as hemodynamic in-stent restenosis (ISR) after CAS are increasing and usually treated again by endovascular approach. This preliminary study, instead, albeit in a limited series, reports our safe and successful experience of the surgical correction of carotid ISR after CAS., Methods: From January 2003 to June 2011 seven patients with severe hemodynamic carotid ISR (three symptomatic, four asymptomatic, mean age 76±2), were submitted to surgical operation to remove the carotid stent. The indications for CAS were primary in five cases, secondary to restenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in two patients. Standard CEA with complete removal of the stent and the entire atherosclerotic plaque was carried out easy and without technical difficulty in the five primary ISR. In the two patients of ISR in post-CEA restenosis, a common carotid to the distal internal carotid artery (ICA) bypass with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft was carried out. Mean operation time was 88±26 min. All interventions were performed under general anesthesia with remifentanil preserved consciousness., Results: No death or major complications occurred. Temporary vocal cord impairment by deficit of recurrent inferior laryngeal nerve in one patient with ISR after CAS performed to treat post-CEA restenosis was observed. Intimal hyperplasia was the predominant mechanism to ISR. The mean follow-up of 18 months (range, 4 to 36 months) showed a normal patency of the surgical correction without recurrent restenosis on color-coded duplex ultrasounds (US) examinations., Conclusion: The surgical management of carotid ISR appears feasible and effective leading to good long-term outcome.

The syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone after carotid endarterectomy is very rare; only two cases have been reported in medical literature. We describe the case of an 82-year-old woman presenting with lethargy and drowsiness due to severe hyponatremia with urine hyperosmolarity and plasma hypo-osmolarity after carotid endarterectomy., (Copyright © 2012 Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: The increasing use of carotid artery stenting (CAS) is justified in patients at high-risk for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that the high-risk patients can be submitted to CEA without increased risk of stroke and death., Methods: A retrospective analysis of 625 consecutive CEA in 545 patients (M/F 386/159, age 75 ± 7) performed from January 2005 to December 2010 was carried out. Definite anatomical and pathophysiological high-risk cohort of patients (N.=173, 31.7%) was evaluated and compared to normal risk patients. Univariate, multivariate and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used as appropriate. Poisson regression (Pr) model was used to study all univariate criteria in combination. A P value <0.05 was statistically significant., Results: The overall 30-day stroke and death rate was 0.96%. No difference between high-risk vs. normal patient cohort regarding physiological and anatomical risk factors was detected. Univariate and multivariate analysis did not show statistical difference for 30-day outcome in any of the variables examined. No increase of risk in cases of presence of more risk factors resulted to the Pr analysis. The 24-month survival rate was worse in high-risk patients, especially when more physiologic risk as chronic renal failure, severe pulmonary and cardiac diseases and age over eighty were present., Conclusion: CEA is a safe procedure in patients at high-risk carotid artery disease. A better classification of high-risk patients may be necessary because trials criteria appear ineffective to define the patients at real high surgical risk. Long-term outcome was affected by the presence of severe comorbidities.

Aim: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is the treatment of choice for recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). However a significative incidence of in-stent restenosis could be occurred. Despite classical CEA leads to good results, in selective cases bypass graft may be the best treatment of in-stent restenosis., Case Reports: We describe two cases of carotid bypass graft performed to treat a recurrent in-stent stenosis after CAS for post-CEA restenosis. No death and cardiac complication occurred and no cranial nerves impairment was detected., Conclusion: Prosthetic bypass graft is safe and effective in treatment of in-stent recurrent restenosis after CEA restenosis.

Objectives: We prospectively evaluated safety and efficacy from our six-year results of general anesthesia (GA) using remifentanil conscious sedation in carotid endarterectomy (CEA)., Methods: From January 2005 to December 2010, 625 consecutive CEAs were performed on 545 patients (male/female 336/209, age 75 ± 7 years). After a superficial plexus block with ropavacaine, GA was induced with an intravenous infusion of propofol, using local lidocaine during tracheal intubation and a high-dose of remifentanil, in all cases reducing and then stopping the remifentanil infusion at the clamping time so that the patient would be awake and collaborating within a few minutes, as in local anesthesia. Data on postoperative morbidity and mortality, neurological complications, shunt insertions and the responses to one-day and three-month questionnaires on satisfaction were collected for all patients., Results: The 30-day mortality was 0.32% (two patients). Only one major stroke (0.16%) and two minor strokes (0.32%) occurred. A shunt was deployed in 83 cases (13.3%). Eight patients (1.28%) reported cranial nerve injuries, and surgical drainage for postoperative hematoma was performed in 11 patients (1.8%). Thirty-one patients (4.6%) suffered postoperative nausea/vomiting. Almost all patients were satisfied at the 24-h (94.6%) and three-month (>98%) follow-up questionnaire., Conclusions: The six-year results for GA using remifentanil conscious sedation were very satisfactory and highlighted the advantages of both GA (hemodynamic stability and excellent control of ventilation) and local anesthesia (ease of evaluation of neurological status) in a calm and relaxed environment for both patient and surgeon.

The internal carotid artery (ICA) usually, lies posterolaterally to the external carotid artery (ECA). Sometimes a complete carotid transposition can occur, with the ECA in a lateral position and the ICA on the medial side can occur. Our study evaluated the significance and impact that this anomaly may have on cranial nerve injuries. From January 2008 to November 2010, 296 patients underwent 360 consecutive primary carotid endarterectomy (CEA) procedures. During carotid isolation, we detected an unexpected lateral position of the ECA in 11 cases (3.6%). χ(2) analysis and the Student's t-test were used to compare the incidence of cranial nerve injuries between the 11 patients with the lateral ECA who underwent CEA (group A) and 11 randomized patients with a normal bifurcation (group B). Statistical significance was inferred at χ(2)>3.84 and P<0.05. A statistical difference in the incidence of superior laryngeal nerve paralysis was detected between groups A and B (18.1%, 2/11 in group A vs. 0%, 0/11 in group B; χ(2)>3.84; P<0.05). No differences in incidence of injury were detected for the other cranial nerves. A very meticulous mobilization of the ECA and ICA is needed to perform CEA, but superior laryngeal nerve injury can occur despite the use of a safe and meticulous surgical technique.

Aim: Nerve injuries, wound complications and especially poor cosmetic results still have an important impact on the carotid endarterectomy (CEA) morbidity. Introduction of the mini skin incision in clinical practice seems to be safe with reduction in postoperative pain and superficial and cranial nerves lesions, and better aesthetics outcomes. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the results between the short longitudinal with the short transverse cervical incision and to evaluate their impact on cranial and cervical nerves and aesthetic outcomes., Methods: From January 2007 to December 2009 266 patients underwent 300 consecutive primary CEA procedures. Two-hundred nineteen patients were submitted to short longitudinal cervical incision (group A), in eighty one a short transverse cervical skin incision (group B) was performed. The average of skin incision was about 4-5.5 cm. In all cases a preoperative CEA duplex ultrasounds (US) assisted skin marking was carried out. All patients were submitted to the general anesthesia with Remifentanyl conserved consciousness. Routinely synthetic patch and selective policy intraluminal shunts were used. Incisions were extended when shunts were required or in case of high carotid bifurcation. Preoperative and postoperative cranial nerves evaluation was always performed and a questionnaire about the satisfaction of the aesthetic outcome was proposed to all patients to the discharge and six months follow-up. Stroke/TIA, death, wound complications, cranial and cervical nerves injuries and restenosis rate were reported and analyzed through statistical analysis (χ2 and Student's t test)., Results: The 30 days mortality was 0.3% (1/300). The TIA rate was 0.91% in group A and 1.2 % in group B (P>0.9). Wound complications were 1.8% and 1.2 % respectively (P>0.1). No statistically differences were reported in the incidence of cranial and cervical nerves injuries between the two groups (P>0.9). No difference in restenosis rate was detected (P>0.9). In case of lengthening of the incision for high internal carotid (ICA) stenosis and especially to the need of shunt deployment, the longitudinal approach showed unequivocally to be easier and safer., Conclusion: No differences were achieved between short longitudinal and transverse incision in term of stroke, wound complications or nerves impairment. A good cosmetic outcome was gained in both groups. The Duplex US skin markings pre-CEA permitted localization and limits of the plaque with appropriate short incision. A longitudinal cervical approach is to prefer as can lead to an easier proximal and distal lengthening in cases of atherosclerotic extension of the plaque and shunt deployment.

Aim: To retrospectively evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of general anesthesia with remifentanyl conscious sedation (RCS) vs local-regional anesthesia (LA) for carotid endarterectomy (CEA)., Methods: From January 2004 to January 2008, 390 CEA performed in 325 patients (M/F 214/111, age 75 +/- 7) were collected in 2 groups: RCS group included 275 consecutive CEA in 230 patients carried out under remifentanyl conscious sedation with stopping of the remifentanyl infusion at the carotid clamping time to evaluate the clinical neurological status; LA group was composed of 115 consecutive CEA in 95 patients, performed under local-regional anesthesia. We evaluated complications, postoperative morbidity and mortality, need for shunt insertion and compared the results by means of Student's t-test and chi2 analysis. P value <0.05 (T=2.28) was considered significant., Results: The 30 days mortality was 0.35% in the RCS group and 0% for LA group (P=NS). The 30 days stroke rates were 0.3% and 0% respectively (P=NS). TIA/RIND rates were 0.3% for RCS group and 1.7% for LA group (P=0.47); shunt usage was 20% for RCS group and 17% for LA group (P=0.26). We found higher postoperative nausea/vomiting in the RCS group (3.9% vs 0.8%, P<0.05)., Conclusions: General anesthesia with remifentanyl conscious sedation seems to be a safe technique, allowing monitoring of the neurological status, cerebral protection during arterial clamping, better control of the airway and a good compliance to both the surgeon and the patient. A randomized control trial is needed to prove RCS to be effective as LA.

The persistence of hypoglossal artery is a rare malformation. Association of carotid stenosis with persistent hypoglossal artery can lead to cerebral posterior symptoms due to ischemia intolerance. The Authors report a case of unexpected intraoperative detection of this anomaly in a patient with high grade stenosis of the right internal carotid artery. Right carotid endarterectomy was performed, and no shunt was used. The postoperative course was normal. The literature was reviewed.