Search

Background: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) reduce the risk of stroke in patients with severe carotid stenosis. The aim was to compare contemporary treatment trends and outcomes after CEA and CAS between states of Australia., Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from the Australasian Vascular Audit between 2010 and 2017. The primary endpoint was perioperative stroke or death (S/D). We also analysed stroke and death independently and revascularization rates per 100 000 population., Results: A total of 15 413 patients underwent carotid revascularization (CEA 14 070; CAS 1343). S/D rates were similar for CEA and CAS (1.9% versus 1.8%; P = 0.37; symptomatic 2.1% versus 2.3%; P = 0.12; asymptomatic 1.5% versus 1.1%; P = 0.67). Patients ≥80 years (2.7% versus 1.7%; P = 0.01), those who had shunts (2.2% versus 1.7%; P = 0.03) or surgery in teaching hospitals (2.6% versus 1.4%; P = 0.02) had higher rates of S/D after CEA. Patients whose proceduralist used a cerebral protection device had lower S/D rates after CAS for symptomatic disease (4.8% versus 2.2%; P = 0.03). There was a wide variation in practice between states, where CAS as a proportion of total carotid procedures ranged from 0% to 17%, and a wide variation in outcomes, with rates of S/D varying between 1.4-6.6% for CEA and 0-6.7% after CAS., Conclusion: Outcomes after CAS are equivalent to CEA when performed by vascular surgeons, however significant variation exists for both choice of revascularization procedure and perioperative outcomes between states. Further investigation is needed to determine whether clinical care pathways should be revised to achieve consistency and quality of outcomes., (© 2021 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.)

Objectives: The aim was to analyse a prospective, consecutive series of awake carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patients undergoing, when possible, pre- and postoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging brain scans (DWI)., Methods: All CEA patients from June 23, 2006, to January 13, 2012, were prospectively entered in the study. CEA was performed under regional cervical block. Only patients demonstrating shunt dependence were shunted. Before August 7, 2008, all longitudinal endarterectomy had been performed with a vein patch. From that date all CEA were eversions without a patch, except shunted patients who were vein patched. DWI was performed 2 days before and 5 days after (3 Tesla). Scans were reported by MRI-trained radiologists. Logistic regression analysis (LRA) identified predictive variables for MRI changes using backward stepwise elimination of variables with p > .05., Results: There was a total of 295 consecutive CEA. There were no deaths but four clinical strokes (1.4 %); 89 excluded from DWI leaving 206; of these 27 (13%) developed new DWI lesions including four of 57 (7%) in the asymptomatic group and 23 of 149 (15%) symptomatic patients. Nineteen of the 206 (9.2%) were shunted. LRA showed that shunt dependence was highly associated with new DWI lesions: odds ratio (OR) 6.43; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-17.9; p < .001. Both the vein patched, non-shunted group (OR .25; CI 0.09-0.72; p = .010) and the eversion (all non-shunted and all non-patched) group (OR 0.05; CI 0.01-0.22; p < .001) were associated with a low risk of new lesions, with the eversion group a lower risk than the patched group., Conclusions: One in every eight CEA patients developed new DWI lesions (rate doubled in symptomatic patients). Shunt dependence in conscious CEA patients is highly associated with the development of new DWI lesions compared with non-shunted patients. For non-shunted patients the new lesion risk is low, and in those patients the risk in the eversion group is lower than in the patched group., (Copyright © 2015 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Melbourne Vascular Surgical Association (Melbourne, Australia) undertakes surveillance of mortality following aortic aneurysm surgery, patency at discharge following infrainguinal bypass and stroke and death following carotid endarterectomy. Quality improvement protocol employing the Deming cycle requires that the system for performing surgery first be analysed and optimized. Then process and outcome data are collected and these data require careful analysis. There must be a mechanism so that the causes of unsatisfactory outcomes can be determined and a good feedback mechanism must exist so that good performance is acknowledged and unsatisfactory performance corrected. A simple method for analysing these data that detects changes in average outcome rates is available using cumulative sum statistical control charts., Methods: Data have been analysed both retrospectively from 1999 to 2001, and prospectively during 2002 using cumulative sum control methods. A pathway to deal with control chart signals has been developed., Results: The standard of arterial surgery in Victoria, Australia, is high. In one case a safe and satisfactory outcome was achieved by following the pathway developed by the audit committee., Conclusion: Cumulative sum control charts are a simple and effective tool for the identification of variations in performance standards in arterial surgery. The establishment of a pathway to manage problem performance is a vital part of audit activity.